Aqeedah Questions, Evolution And More.. Muhammed Ali

[@TheMuslimLantern]

Timestamps added to make the video easier to watch, don't forget to support the video by liking, sharing and subscribing barakallahu feekom! Support the Channel: www.patreon.com/TheMuslimLantern cash.app/%C2%A3TheMuslimLantern

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Prophet Muhammad peace & blessings on him said I am the best salaf, & asked where is Allah to a Abd bint, who said Above the Heavens - why its important? We are to worship Allah (Quran 51 :56) as Allah is our & of our ancestors Lord (Quran 2 :21), we know Allah by His attributes (Quran 7 : 180 & 65 : 12) & Allah's Siffat of Existance is by Knowing Allah is Above the Throne Honored (Quran 69 :12) & not limited (Quran 4 :126) & to reject this is the way of Firaun, Jahmiyah and ppl of atheism, (Quran 40 :37) and to say Allah is in the creation is the way of pagans like qayraish, christians or hindus (Quran 53 :19), but no, we are the middle path, Allah exists Above the Throne Honored & His Attributes encompass creation (Quran 20 : 4-8 & 46) --- Quran 50 : 16. And indeed We have created man, and We know what his ownself whispers to him. And We are nearer to him than his jugular vein (by Our Knowledge). Quran 7 : 7. Then surely, We shall narrate unto them (their whole story) with knowledge, and indeed We have not been absent. Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah may Allaah have mercy upon him was asked about the words of the Prophet, ... Quran 50:16] that it refers to the angels. --- Islam is the middle path of Tawhid between the pagans and atheism and same with Knowing the Attributes of Allah, they are unique and affirmed, and we are the middle path religion (Quran 2 :143 - Aqida Wasitiya) in general! Q 2 :25 Ibn Kathir, Ibn Abbas - the Similitude of this life and the next is only in the names! Quran 16 : 60. For those who believe not in the Hereafter is an evil description, and for Allah is the highest description. And He is the All-Mighty, the All-Wise. - Allah's description is mentioned as highest above tashbih & with belief in hereafter, we will see Allah - Quran 75 :22.

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Allah is 1 & made us needy pairs - Quran 112 :1 & 36 :36. Re: life tree evolution. 1. how did self-copying become mating if there is no Creator God?? 2. & before how did no 1 cell being become dual cell? (no mechanism!) 3. Why's dna & rna co-op languages if no distinct Creator? this evolution's void! It's spontaneous generation with goal posts.

[@dinbachok6424]

Thank you

[@XDRONIN]

@22:49 Scientists don't have what? 1. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jH2mopKsrN9npbs 2. kzbin.info/www/bejne/ham2eGuaqqeWrqc 3. kzbin.info/www/bejne/rKrbXqWvjK11aNU

[@TheKingofTheUniverse.]

Ya akhi, I wanna ask a question. How can I ask you about Islam?

[@AesthetixPro]

I pray to birth a son just like Muhammed.... knowledgeable, humble, respectful and proud to be a muslim.

[@Milanaçik]

Amin inshaallah🤲🏻

[@elizab..h]

Me too!!! And like Khabib

[@ridhoabdurrachman]

Aameen

[@mennavanessa]

Ameen

[@MR.FlyingMonkey]

If brother Muhammad Ali was a girl , I would have married her. 😅😊😊 But This Brother is my dear Bro now 😎

[@blakmumba375]

'Debates are blameworthy not praiseworthy'. Best piece of knowledge anyone can take away!

[@khadijah3519]

I SOOO need to find this type of space here in the U.S. Just to listen and ask questions! Such a beautiful space to be in! Bless You, Brother🌺

[@SyedRedwon]

You can follow: One Message Foundation. If you even need the link, just let me know, please.

[@Hasif19-z9x]

Shaykh Uthman ibn Farooq is sometimes at balboa park but at the moment he is travelling but yes hes at balboa park sometimes and he’ll usually post videos about where he is for a couple days

[@khadijah3519]

@@Hasif19-z9x I am in Indiana (Midwest). Where is Balboa Park?!

[@Hasif19-z9x]

@@khadijah3519 San Diego

[@shahid8545]

This young brother is very wise beyond his years Allahumma barik. Very sound way of deflecting potential points which could cause fitna and very thorough in his delivery which I really appreciate a lot. Thank you for being balanced akhi.. its refreshing. May Allah protect you from evil.

[@friskyguy00]

I love this guy, Just amazing.

[@sammu]

Wallahi brother, your genuine nature and your wanting to stay away from fitnah or picking on individual personalities is what draws me towards your channel more and more. I don't want to throw dust in your face except this is so you know what the laymen value. I will make du'ah that Allah keep you steadfast like this and you stay away from all existing and upcoming fitan.

[@mansoorsaleem525]

this video was very neccessory for us, the questions our brother made were marvalous and the answers didnt leave a blank spot behind. we should watch this video again if any question arises relative to the addressed topics

[@faiqikhan4704]

This Man is a Blessing to this world... JazakAllah

[@imahmud]

I would love to learn from this brother. Masha Allah. May Allah give you a long life and protect you.❤

[@Lokation404]

MashaAllah tabarakAllah

[@Haybaye]

Excellent dawsh brother mashaAllah tabarakAllah

[@yayaj9442]

May allah protect him and give him long live❤

[@hanamizuki2288]

Assalamu Alaikum brother I'm from japan and I love to watch all your videos. May Allah Bless u ❤

[@abusewrId]

日本人のムスリムスどこですか？I hope that sentence makes sense. I tried my best. I’m going to Japan in about 2 years while learning Japanese, and I want to have a muslim community there. I want to do some da’wah there too. I heard Osaka is the best place to find muslims, but is there any place you think is better? Also, if you reverted, as most Japanese muslims have; what were the things that in particular made you revert? And what was tough in becoming a muslim whether in belief system or being a muslimah in Japan. From what I understand, food and social conventions and ideas about religion (made worse due to Aum cult) are some of the main obstacles as a muslim in Japan. JazaakAllah! ありがとうございます！

[@LamaKasabli]

Very good points, brother Mohamad. Allah bless you.

[@Haybaye]

MashaAllah tabarakAllah brother

[@hazrathariz]

Is that the brother from Belgium that I met at Speakers Corner who is talking borther Ali? Alhamdulillah, love this brother and his team. May Allah bless protect and continue guiding us all. It was a blessing Alhamdulillah to be there with Muhammad Ali and his team.

[@Moerat]

Brother Ali can you make a video about your journey so far in the dawah scene and what motivated you to get into this field Inshallah.

[@raseemriyas2889]

Evolution and Darwinism The first thing that needs to be done is to distinguish between evolution and Darwin’s theory of evolution (also known as Darwinism or neo-Darwinism). On a public level, these terms are thought to be the same, but academically they are not. So what is the difference? Evolution, as a general concept, means biological change over time. On the other hand, Darwinian evolution has two parts: firstly, the history of life being represented by a tree where all the organisms that have ever lived go back to one common origin, and secondly, that natural selection is the primary driving mechanism behind all this biological change. Evolution is a basic observation in nature, and one we can see before our very eyes. This basic type of evolution is true and happens all around us: butterfly populations change biologically over time, bacteria become resistant to medicine, fish lose traits that are detrimental over time, and so on. No one disagrees with this type of biological evolution being ubiquitous, and this was well known before Darwin. Even the most primitive human being who has had no interaction with the civilised world would agree that this evolution is an undeniable observation. Darwinian evolution, on the other hand, claims to be more than this basic observable evolution. According to Darwinian evolution, all of life evolved from a single cell, and all biological change has happened primarily due to natural selection. Although it is absolutely clear that there is a difference between evolution and Darwinism, much of the general public thinks they are one and the same. This confusion is not inconsequential. This is because people conflate this apparent observable evolution with Darwinian evolution. They think that evidence for the former is evidence for the latter. This is simply not true. Darwinian evolution has the twin thesis of the tree of life and natural selection, which both require evidence other than the basic observation of evolution itself. This distinction is important to clarify, so claiming that they are the same and using this to argue for the truth of Darwinian evolution is to commit a fallacy of equivocation. Darwinian evolution is based on a probabilistic framework that has assumptions, and it is important to note that there are ongoing disputes and doubts about its central claims. Probabilistic Framework Working out the history of life on earth is a difficult task for two simple reasons: life first began a very long time ago, and there is a worryingly large set of data that is missing. While life has been around on Earth for about four billion years, 99.999% of all things that ever lived are estimated to be extinct and undiscovered.[4] The picture of the history of life and evolutionary developments that biologists try to create involve probabilities, simplifications, and speculations. To get a feel for this problem, consider an analogy presented in the prestigious scientific journal Science. It compares working out the evolutionary history of human life to working out the plot of Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace using thirteen randomly selected pages from the novel! Tolstoy’s book is one of the largest literary pieces ever published. If you were given a copy of the book with all the pages blank and only thirteen with writing on it, do you really think you would be able to come up with an accurate rendition of the major plot points, let alone any semblance of their details? One can look at the possible evolutionary history of life on Earth and come up with a number of differing interpretations - a single or multiple origins of life; a universal or multiple common ancestors; gradualism or rapid biological changes; the hedge or tree or bush or web of life. Whatever interpretation you make can be challenged by an alternative one. Working out the history and development of life is an arduous task, and it is impossible to give a definitive answer. Whatever answer is given today by biologists is at best still probabilistic, but they cannot say for sure what happened and how it happened. The tree of life is a well-recognised symbol of Darwinism. Darwin assumed that all of life came from one cell sometime in the remote past. This was followed by a gradual branching out of different species in a tree-like pattern. Open up any book on biology and you will see the famous tree of life mentioned. On a popular level, the tree of life is given to be true, yet within academia, it is known as just a model. The tree of life is based on the idea of homology, which is the assumption that similarities between genes, anatomy, and other traits are due to common descent. Once again, in the public perception, homology is thought to be an indisputable conclusion, whereas in fact it is only an assumption. No one was around billions of years ago to watch how one species led to another distant one. Since we only have observed 0.0001% of life on Earth, any ‘tree’ that is made to show genealogical relationships is tentative at best. Homology as an assumption is challenged by homoplasy, which is the observation of similarities in genetic data and anatomy that cannot be due to common descent. In other words, even when one builds a tree of life based on the assumption of homology, some similarities can never be due to common descent. Whether we look at the tree of life as a whole or as two branches of species that have a common ancestor, we are still dealing with probabilities based on assumptions, and not hard facts. In his book Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind The Science, Professor Elliott Sober explains: Both of the following thoughts are therefore naive: humans and chimps must share a common ancestor because they are so similar and humans and mushrooms must have arisen independently because they are so different. There is no must within a probabilistic framework.[5] We will now outline some of the many assumptions that the probabilistic framework of Darwinism holds..... subboorahmad.com/

[@slimanipdr]

May Allah grand you the highest place in jannah, ameen. TabaraAllah akhi.

[@MoroccanARROWS]

*May Allah swt teach us what benefits us and benefit us from what He taught us and increase us in knowledge and we seek refuge in Allah from a knowledge which doesn't benefit its seeker* (not to be of those who learn but who do not put into practise what they have learnt !!)... *Ameen*

[@abusewrId]

امين و كاس العالم كُن خير انشاءالله

[@arafatmunnahossain6988]

SubahanAllah, And do not confound truth with falsehood, and do not hide the truth when you know. (Al-Quran Surah No. 2 - Ayah No. 42)

[@abderrahman_01]

We love you for the sake of Allah May Allah bless you

[@homtanks7259]

JazakAllahu khairan

[@um9532]

Ma sha Allah so beneficial conversation May Allah bless you

[@mohdamjaddehlvi3063]

I love you.......brother Muhammad Ali........❤.....you are Brilliant.......

[@karemahmed698]

Jazakallah Khair!

[@muhammadalifmohdtarmizi4765]

It's ok if we have a doubt or questioning something but don't decide by ourselves find someone who has knowledge on particular topic. Love the conversation. Thank Bro Ali.

[@faizal85z]

Allaah is above the heavens ☝️

[@Yadullah12]

I love this guy for sake of Allah

[@salah__ad_deen]

جزاك اللهُ خيرًا بارك الله فيك أحبك في الله أخي يهديكم الله و يصلح بالكم ‏ ‏تقبل الله منا ومنكم بأمان الله آمين يارب العالمين

[@arakibhosen434]

ALHAMDULILLAH ❤️ ALLAH bless you all ❤️ JAJAKALLA KHIRAN ❤️🙂❤️

[@Issa2860]

Barak Allahu feekum

[@angelosaleh8344]

ALLAH SWT is who HE is. ☝🏼

[@anasbanaggar]

Ma Shaa Allah

[@bazmsc]

In Malaysia is also like that where the religious men have big arguments on maturudi, ashari and salafi. But when they has nothing to respond, they will label salafi as wahabi 🤣… you need to migrate to Malaysia my bro.. to educate muslim Malaysian and do dakwah here.

[@mohdhafizahmadzainuri6144]

Awak wahabi ke? 🫣

[@nugrohomuhtarif2887]

The same goes in Indonesia 😂

[@crongo4284]

vahhaaabi

[@aboshaib61]

وفقك الله شيخ محمد

[@sofianhammachi8248]

بارك الله فيك

[@thejourney6369]

Alhamdulillah

[@hoomanAdnan]

MashaAllah ❤️ ❤️🇧🇩

[@wizeguy77]

لله درك ، جزاك الله خيرا

[@eslamanwar1171]

I love dr eyad quenaby as well if you know arabic you should follow him very beneficial.

[@felreizmeshinca7459]

The Journey of Certainty Dr. Eyad Qunaibi - Global Channel

[@muhammadfajarprimajuniansy3416]

Jazaakumullaahu khayran

[@MB-rt5bx]

Excellent qs by the br. Can you pls share link to Dr who dismantles evolution argument.

[@loftilhan4868]

Dr Eyad Al Qunaibi

[@MoroccanARROWS]

Please search for إياد قنيبي (maybe Iyad Qunaibi). He is EXCELLENT Allahumma barik in every topic he approches. He's got channels in Arabic and English. I rather follow the Arabic contents.

[@MoroccanARROWS]

kzbin.info

[@adityatama2334]

i think he is saying dr eyad qunaibi and the channel indeed has videos on evolution

[@iftekhartuhin]

Here it is- kzbin.info/www/bejne/hIjVmJSvra-oZqc

[@Boss-313]

عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ نَافِعٍ قَالَ سُئِلَ مَالِكٌ رحمه الله عَنْ قَوْلِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ الرَّحْمَنُ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ اسْتَوَى قَالَ كَيْفَ اسْتَوَى فَقَالَ اسْتِوَاؤُهُ مَعْلُومٌ وَكَيْفِيَّتُهُ مَجْهُولَةٌ وَسُؤَالُكُ عَنْ هَذَا بِدْعَةٌ وَأَرَاكَ رَجُلَ سُوءٍ 2/529 الاستذكار قال ابن عبد البر أَهْلُ السُّنَّةِ مُجْمِعُونَ عَلَى الإِقْرَارِ بِالصِّفَاتِ الْوَارِدَةِ كُلِّهَا فِي الْقُرْآنِ وَالسُّنَّةِ وَالإِيمَانِ بِهَا وَحَمْلِهَا عَلَى الْحَقِيقَةِ لَا عَلَى الْمَجَازِ إِلَّا أَنَّهُمْ لَا يُكَيِّفُونَ شَيْئًا مِنْ ذَلِكَ 1/250 العلو للعلي الغفار

[@animalsworld8852]

أحبك في الله اخي علي

[@banandababa]

When people talk about ashari, wahhabi etc and all these creeds my brain locks out. So very confusing for me a born Muslim I can’t imagine how it is for a new Muslim doing research.

[@zaidpansare8579]

Even my brain was locked out at first, but with time I understood that the Athari creed is the correct one. You can watch Shaykh Uthman's interview with Bobby's Perspective on the OMF channel. In the interview, Bobby asks about the attributes of Allah such as His Hand, His Face etc. Shaykh Uthman has explained him nicely and what Shaykh has explained is pretty much (in brief) the Athari belief regarding the characteristics of Allah SWT. Watch part 2 of the interview.

[@jojoahmd123]

Read that’s the key ….nothing is called wahabi by the way 😂😂

[@stylishspaces0]

*About ALLAH ﷻ attributes, characteristics and acts :* Let's start with the Istiwa' (ALLAH ﷻ is above the Throne) and then conclude some points Insha'ALLAH : ALLAH ﷻ said : 20: 5 ٱلرَّحْمَـٰنُ عَلَى ٱلْعَرْشِ ٱسْتَوَىٰ The Most Merciful [who is] above the Throne established. And He ﷻ said : 2: 29 هُوَ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ لَكُم مَّا فِى ٱلْأَرْضِ جَمِيعًا ثُمَّ ٱسْتَوَىٰٓ إِلَى ٱلسَّمَآءِ فَسَوَّىٰهُنَّ سَبْعَ سَمَـٰوَٰتٍ ۚ وَهُوَ بِكُلِّ شَىْءٍ عَلِيمٌ It is He who created for you all of that which is on the earth. Then He directed Himself to the heaven, [His being above all creation], and made them seven heavens, and He is Knowing of all things. And He ﷻ said : 67: 16 ءَأَمِنتُم مَّن فِى ٱلسَّمَآءِ أَن يَخْسِفَ بِكُمُ ٱلْأَرْضَ فَإِذَا هِىَ تَمُورُ Do you feel secure that the One Who is in heaven will not cause the earth to swallow you up as it quakes violently? And He ﷻ also said : 7: 54 إِنَّ رَبَّكُمُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٰتِ وَٱلْأَرْضَ فِى سِتَّةِ أَيَّامٍ ثُمَّ ٱسْتَوَىٰ عَلَى ٱلْعَرْشِ... Indeed, your Lord is Allah, who created the heavens and earth in six days and then established Himself above the Throne... Narrated Mu'awiyah b. al-Hakam al-Sulami: I said: Messenger of Allah, I have a slave girl whom I slapped. This grieved the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). I said to him: Should I not emancipate her? He said: Bring her to me. He said: Then I brought her. He asked: Where is Allah ? She replied: In the heaven. He said: Who am I ? She replied: You are the Messenger of Allah. He said: Emancipate her, she is a believer. [Sunan Abi Dawud 3282, Sahih] - The Istiwa' is known (mentioned in the Qur'an and/or the Sunnah), but the how of it is unknown , and we shouldn't ask about the how because we have no access to that knowledge, and we should start trying imagining how is this Istiwa' with our limited mind, we can't imagine the unimaginable who is beyond everything, and there is none comparable to ALLAH ﷻ in attributes, qualities and acts... ALLAH ﷻ said : 42: 11 فَاطِرُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٰتِ وَٱلْأَرْضِ ۚ جَعَلَ لَكُم مِّنْ أَنفُسِكُمْ أَزْوَٰجًا وَمِنَ ٱلْأَنْعَـٰمِ أَزْوَٰجًا ۖ يَذْرَؤُكُمْ فِيهِ ۚ لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِۦ شَىْءٌ ۖ وَهُوَ ٱلسَّمِيعُ ٱلْبَصِيرُ [He is] Creator of the heavens and the earth. He has made for you from yourselves, mates, and among the cattle, mates; He multiplies you thereby. There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing. And He ﷻ said : 112: 4 وَلَمْ يَكُن لَّهُۥ كُفُوًا أَحَدٌۢ Nor is there to Him any equivalent." - So His Istiwa' is surely not like the Istiwa' of any creation. We only know about ALLAH ﷻ from what He told us and His Messenger ﷺ about Himself, we should not start imagining things about ALLAH ﷻ or using philosophy on ALLAH ﷻ with our limited minds. - Likwise ALLAH ﷻ mentioned in many places that He has hands, face,....but surely His hands are not like the Creations's hands, His face isn't like the Creation's Face,....... He has hands that befits His Majesty, He has a face that befits His Majesty, He is above the Arsh in a manner that befits His Majesty We shouldn't try to interpret His attributes, qualities and acts... We only need to confirm them Because ALLAH ﷻ knows best how they are, we don't ask about the howness , we don't have access to it. We only say about ALLAH ﷻ what He and His Messenger ﷺ said without additions because our mind is limited we can't imagine ALLAH ﷻ attributes, characteristics, ... Imam Malik, May ALLAH ﷻ have mercy on him, said about the issue of Istiwa' on Arsh : ''The Istiwa' is known, the how is unknown, and we shouldn't ask about the howness'' And There is none comparable to ALLAH ﷻ in attributes, qualities, and acts So yes when it comes to the unseen that ALLAH ﷻ didn't tell us about Like the how of his attributes, qualities and acts.... We only say 67: 26 قُلْ إِنَّمَا ٱلْعِلْمُ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ وَإِنَّمَآ أَنَا۠ نَذِيرٌ مُّبِينٌ Say, "The knowledge is only with Allah, and I am only a clear warner." ALLAH ﷻ has face that befits His Majesty.... How is this face ? We don't know, but surely not like the face of the creations

[@MoroccanARROWS]

@@zaidpansare8579 what is athari ? (In Arabic plz if possible?)

[@zaidpansare8579]

@@MoroccanARROWS The creed of the Salaf. (اثري ) Also called as Hanbali creed or nowadays called the Salafi creed.

[@lovemamahouse]

Allah humma barik

[@cikmen9572]

Sapa pandai terjemah, tolong terjemah ni, best

[@mohdhafizahmadzainuri6144]

Polemik antara akidah salafiyah dan Asya'irah. Asya'irah terlalu banyak gunakan akal seperti jahmiyah dan Muktazilah tntg sifat² Allah

[@21nov2003]

I love this channel, helped convert so many but was a little harsh on this guy as he was just wanting to learn I think, just saying out of love! I am no better

[@fxorigins6624]

Mybe cos he is muslim 😅 but yeah agree with you

[@samiulhussain3045]

I agree

[@Marie28899000083]

Yeah 🥲 i thought others would notice that too lol. But may Allah forgive them both

[@aosel-gharably2236]

I didn’t see it Wallah

[@say_aashnaa9302]

I feel like brother Muhammad is tired he is kind of done with his questions while he is just asking simple little questions ! I don't blame him its a work of patience at the end of the day!

[@herrdado3970]

Salaam Alaykum from the USA. Can you tell me what microphone and camera you're using? I'm looking to do a dawah channel in the USA inshaAllah.

[@revertDaWOOD]

Allahumma Barik for your intentions:]

[@herrdado3970]

@@TMNmedia It's easier to start with the right tools.

[@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص]

Study Islam and its sciences as new ones, then respond to suspicions and lies about Islam, then read books against the sects and religions that violate the Muslim faith. Muhammad Ali, Othman bin Al-Farouq, Shamsi, etc.. They studied Islam well before discussing and arguing with non-Muslims.

[@herrdado3970]

@@عبدالله-ن6ه2ص dude. Great advice. But you don't know me. How do you assume that I don't know or that I don't study? Maybe I've been giving dawah for over 10 years just never recorded it. Just maybe 😉

[@Mo9ala7]

👇🏼 Comment where you are watching from for KZbin Algorithm 🔴

[@Mo9ala7]

Kuwait City

[@homtanks7259]

Iam from a country that if a Caliphate would be established it would not be a part of it

[@alepoyvulpes]

🇲🇾🇸🇬🇮🇩

[@loftilhan4868]

Singapore

[@zaidpansare8579]

India.

[@mohdhafizahmadzainuri6144]

Understanding the Quran and sunnah according to the salafussoleh

[@oceanworld1383]

Theory of evolution is unproved theory but many people believe it but by believing it,it not shows that is true...

[@omarzaitoun4270]

It's called a Theory because it's not fact. Theory means, unproven belief based on limited evidence. It's not fact. Law of Gravity is fact. This is why they'll never dare call it the Law of Evolution. They have no evidence to prove it as fact.

[@Mr-Safology]

26:38 Dr Eyad Qunaibi

[@shanelamar8857]

The crazy thing is brothers like Mohammed, dawah and hijab don’t even consider themselves scholars with all this knowledge and wisdom Just imagine the wisdom of scholars.

[@Arafatkhan-g9t]

❤❤❤

[@narotomo]

If he's asking about fossils then fyi it is a very very rare process in which all surrounding conditions has to be met. Would love to see you debate an actual scientist.

[@waqaswani2994]

Brother Ali I have long had this question that how when all the four imams agreed on the issue of talaq , how did ibn taymiyya disgree with them and why do people who claim to follow the salaf follow ibn taymiyyas opinion instead of the four imams . How can all the four imams be wrong in their understanding of the Quran and sunnah in this specific case where as ibn taymiyya is right even though he is not from the salaf

[@mohamudahmed6554]

Ibn Taymiyyah's رحمه الله view isn't something the majority people of Sunnah take and reject the Salaf. This isn't the case. Not to mention people generally have no idea about this except those who study of are in discussions where matters of fiqh are discussed. Also, every Aalim that has reached a certain level can go to the scriptures by himself. If they see convincing evidence for a matter, they must be true to it and stick by it. This is a general rule amongst Ulama. If someone has evidence yet chooses to follow who they want and what they want, that is insincerity. Imam Ahmad disagreed with his teacher Al Shafi'i. Al-Shafi'i with Malik. Imam Malik's different views regarding Abu Hanifa was well known. So the truth isn't restricted to 4 people. These 4 Madhabs habe undergone change and reform which shows these 4 Imam's weren't all knowing and that they made mistakes. Not to mention within the madhabs people disagree with the Imam's and there are internal disagreements and different views within a single madhab. Abu Yusuf was the student of Abu Hanifa and disagreed with him in so many more serious issues yet Abu Yusuf is the greatest scholars of Hanafiyyah. So until you know certain knowledge, this matter will be confusing if you have had a false idea which i believe you have.

[@waqaswani2994]

@@mohamudahmed6554 I know the madhaib have intra as well as inter disagreements but what is the case when all four agree such as on talaq . and can you quote me any scholar of the level of these Imams and their students from the salaf who held the view that ibn tyamiyya (rh) did?

[@Mohammed-jf2sp]

مذهب الجمهور من أهل العلم أن من قال لزوجته (أنت طالق ثلاثا) فهو طلاق بدعي، وفاعله آثم، ويقع الطلاق ثلاثا. ومع ذلك فالمسألة ليست محل إجماع ومن ادعى ذلك فهو كاذب أو جاهل أو صاحب هوى وتلبيس. بيان ذلك أن العلماء من زمن السلف انقسموا إلى فريقين حول هذه المسألة: رأي الفريق الأول: الطلاق الثلاث في لفظ واحد يقع ثلاثا وتبين منه زوجته بينونة كبرى، وهو مذهب كثير من الصحابة وقول الأئمة الأربعة وجماهير أتباعهم. رأي الفريق الثاني: الطلاق الثلاث في لفظ واحد يقع واحدة وهو طلاق رجعي، وبه قال أعلام كبار من الصحابة وغيرهم ومنهم: ابن عباس والزبير بن العوام وعبد الرحمن بن عوف وعلي بن أبي طالب وغيرهم، وكذلك: عكرمة وطاووس ومحمد بن إسحاق وداود الظاهري وغيرهم، وكذلك :بعض المالكية، وحكاه بعضهم رواية عن الإمام مالك. وكذلك: بعض الحنفية، مثل محمد بن مقاتل الرازي. وكذلك: بعض الحنابلة مثل أبي البركات ابن تيمية، وحكاه بعضهم رواية في المذهب. وكذلك: شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية وابن القيم والشوكاني والصنعاني وصديق حسن خان، ونذير حسين الدهلوي، وشمس الحق آبادي صاحب عون المعبود وأحمد شاكر وغيرهم من أهل عصرنا، وبه أخذت كثير من دور الإفتاء في الأمصار الإسلامية كمصر.

[@Mohammed-jf2sp]

للاستزادة انظر المغني لابن قدامة.

[@brace_yourself]

@@waqaswani2994 according to ibn taymiyya Hell will End. So don't follow this man.

[@breakdown7553]

on the thumbnail i thought for a second that Muhammed Ali cloned himself and made Dawah with himself :D

[@mefyro]

Can any one explain to me the Wahabi, why some muslim keep accusing other muslim wahabi? even though the person provide the prove from Quran and Sunnah from Hadith Sahih Bukhari, still wahabi.

[@shahid8545]

There is something wrong with their heart beloved. Leave them.

[@dinbachok6424]

Because wahabi are quite strict on tawassul, tabarruq.

[@mohamudahmed6554]

Slanderers, usual they are grave worshippers that say this. Today it is also used by liberals and anyone who is told something about Islam that contradicts their liberal mind. Those liberal will even call the Sufi's wahabi if they find them too strict.

[@nugrohomuhtarif2887]

Islam is true because its strict monotheism.

[@peace.n.blessings5579]

There are those who look for answers to discredit and look for cherry picked answers. Here is a lesson for all, if you don’t know the answer, do not try to answer with your own aqkal. We are a ummah of daleels. Sign post or find out the answer.

[@sharkyboogie]

What’s the Channel’s name of this dr he was talking about at the end ? I would like to watch the series

[@Rightlyguided97]

Dr eyad qunaibi

[@SherAli-kc3bp]

I love your soft, nonaggressive, approach to these videos and the great content. I just had one point that I did not agree with. Hope someone can shed light on the situation. First of all, adaptation is pretty much the argument evolution uses so he kind of maybe shot himself in the foot when he used that word. When it comes to the theory of evolution there are many things that can be proven; we can tell the age of bones and there have been many cases where almost full (if not full) skeleton remains can be found and if these remains were to be lined up in a periodical order they would show the changes in skeletal structure that reflect habits of the "humans" that lived in the time. These habits and changes include the transfer of using all four limbs to bipedal, creating housing, changing from the hunter gather to the farmer, burials/ceremonies, creating and perfecting pots/cutlery/tools/weaponry and more. My question is, if these species that went from all fours to two feet are considered modern day humans, at what point did they actually become humans according to Islam? Concurrently, if they are not humans according to Islam at all, then what were they and how is it evident that they had human like qualities and indeed could have adapted (as mentioned in the video) to become humans?

[@SherAli-kc3bp]

also wanted to clarify i dont believe in the theory of evolution, I just dont know how to explain it to myself.

[@asiyah8239]

Hey! Interesting statement. Can I see the evidence for your claims? Thanks!

[@sayemahashmi6892]

You know evolution is still a theory right? It's not a proven fact as the skeleton structures that should come before 4 legged human like creatures and homosepian is missing and that the genes of a current human female egg can be trace back to one female only. Now this fact is thrown under the bus by all biologist and justified by a long shot of how only one females ancestry survived and became the current human population of 8 billion, which is mathematically and even with the skeletons found of different species makes it impossible.

[@azeemr8961]

I don't think the above is true. Yes they do find skeletons and overtime find skeletons that are slightly different but we cannot "scientifically" draw a conclusion that it was the same species that evolved. What if they were different species? And there are differences in the same species too, for instance my skull shape might be very different to some of the humans currently. Theory of evolution is more like speculation rather than science.

[@ConstantUNTILisnt]

Can u pls place a mic on the other side of table too, its hard to hear them clearly

[@nashitkhan4867]

Can anyone tell the name of the channel he talked about debunking the theory of evolution. I was not able to find it .

[@ibtihelabdullah1819]

I can read Arabic, would anyone please recommend me books that tell about the life of the prophet peace be upon him? Thank you.

[@KatMeIfYouCan96]

Ar-Raheeq Al-Makhtum (The Sealed Nectar): Biography of the Prophet

[@yj9466]

زاد المعاد لإبن القيم الفصول في سيرة الرسول لإبن كثير

[@uzinine7760]

Thank you will look if I can find it in English or a other language I can read.... Also is this the only book about the holy prophet (pbuh) his life. And are there more books I prefer history books that explain when what happened from a muslim point of vieuw? Because I found out that most (western) sites and sources lie and spread misinformation about the prophets (pbut) and mostly about islam and muslim history.

[@mainulhasan7689]

Br Mohammad mentioned a person's KZbin channel like Dr Riyad Hudami or something like that. 26:40. Could anyone help me provide that KZbin channel

[@al-farooq7192]

kzbin.info/aero/PLPqH38Ki1fy3EB-8xmShVqpbQw99Do2B- Dr Eyad Qunaibi

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

Prophet Muhammad peace & blessings on him said I am the best salaf, & asked where is Allah to a slave girl, who said Above the Heavens - why its important? We are to worship Allah (Quran 51 :56) as Allah is our & of our ancestors Lord (Quran 2 :21), we know Allah by His attributes (Quran 7 : 180 & 65 : 12) & Allah's Siffat of Existance is by Knowing Allah is Above the Throne Honored (Quran 69 :12) & not limited (Quran 4 :126) & to reject this is the way of Firaun, Jahmiyah and ppl of atheism, (Quran 40 :37) and to say Allah is in the creation is the way of pagans like qayraish, christians or hindus (Quran 53 :19), but no, we are the middle path, Allah exists Above the Throne Honored & His Attributes encompass creation (Quran 20 : 4-8 & 46) Islam is the middle path of Tawhid between the pagans and atheism and same with Knowing the Attributes of Allah, they are unique and affirmed, and we are the middle path religion (Quran 2 :143 - Aqida Wasitiya) in general! Q 2 :25 Ibn Kathir, Ibn Abbas - the Similitude of this life and the next is only in the names! Quran 16 : 60. For those who believe not in the Hereafter is an evil description, and for Allah is the highest description. And He is the All-Mighty, the All-Wise. - Allah's description is mentioned as highest above tashbih & with belief in hereafter, we will see Allah - Quran 75 :22.

[@shahid8545]

Link to what the brother mentioned about the scholar that has a series on evolution.

[@sultanalsultan9906]

دكتور اياد قتيبي ، you will find it in English too

[@al-farooq7192]

kzbin.info/aero/PLPqH38Ki1fy3EB-8xmShVqpbQw99Do2B- Dr Eyad Qunaibi

[@fazzadon8944]

@26:40 what channel is he talking about ? It's not clear to understand.

[@jojoahmd123]

The name Wahabi is just funny it is just another word for sunni😂 the man only said worship Allah alone to everyone who worshiped humans instead of Allah and his enemy’s made what he said a new Ageeda like read his books nothing new

[@zaidpansare8579]

It has been coined by the Britishers in order to create disunity among the Muslims so that the layman become hostile towards the one who is upon the correct creed. You just call someone "Wahabi" and the laymen here in India would consider him Kafir and don't pray in their Masajids. Here in India, the Bareilvis use this term for the Deobandis and the Ahle Hadith and make takfeer of them and mislead masses saying that your salah is not valid behind Deobandi and Ahle Hadith Imams, since they are not Muslims.

[@Abu_Idris]

Salafi is a more appropriate term, because it means someone who follows the quran and sunnah upon the understanding of the righteous salaf. Wahabi is used as a derogatory term to mean a follower of sheikh muhammed ibn abdulwahab, when in reality we are not followers of sheikh muhammed ibn abdulwahab, but we are upon the same methodology (salafiyyah), and sheikh muhammed ibn abdulwahab was a great scholar who we take knowledge from.

[@zaidpansare8579]

@@glevt Really? Are you even serious? 😂 He is slandering scholars and you are plugging him in here. Look at his YT Shorts where he insulted Shaykh Bin Uthaymeen. He's just all over the place. No one cares about his opinion. We only care about the Quran, Sunnah and Salaf.

[@jojoahmd123]

@@Abu_Idris Yes I know he is another Sunni

[@jojoahmd123]

@@glevt Honey read his books instead of repeating what others told you about him.. think for yourself don’t be a a sheep

[@lilekoe1]

26:43 can someone tell me what book and KZbin channel he’s referring to it’s not clear? Thanks.

[@asiyah8239]

The channel is Dr. Eyad Qunaibi on youtube. :)

[@asiyah8239]

It’s not a book but rather a series on evolution he has.

[@lilekoe1]

@@asiyah8239 thanks 😊

[@abdouliejallow4452]

What's the name of the doctor he mentioned on 26:44? Can anyone help please?

[@mazensoliman4509]

eyadqunaibi

[@sayhimali6384]

Isn't taking things too literally also an issue, for example when people of a certain aqeedah attribute body parts to allah like hand etc, Allâh said in the Qur’ân, in Surat Ash-Shura, ayah 11: { لَيْسَ كمثلهِ شىءٌ وهوَ السَّميعُ البصيرُ } which means: « There is absolutely nothing like Allâh whatsoever, and He has the attributes of Hearing and Seeing. » This ayah absolutely clears Allâh of resembling the creations. this cannot be negated by just saying " has a hand but not like one we can imagine " the hand itself is a creation of أَللّٰه عَزَّ وَ جَلَّ. May أَللّٰه عَزَّ وَ جَلَّ guide us all.

[@khairiaris]

If you refer to the Literalists or Hanbalis... Their position is that.. When God say, Hand.. They just accept it as it is.. They do not make any attempts to likened God's Hand with Creation's Hands nor try to interpret as metaphor like the Asharites.. Personally, I am not a Hanbalis or a student of knowledge but I don't think that having that position is an issue, because we can agree mutually agree, at the end of the day, God knows best..

[@suryaadi404]

Too literally? Come on brother, the quran advised us to take what is clear verses. It means that we can understand it, even by reading it only ...

[@manuelcardinali1287]

in which book of the modern salafiyyin or the salaf did you find mentioned that we believe Allah having "body parts"? Can you mention one?

[@sayhimali6384]

@@manuelcardinali1287 See Ibn Baz's book Tanbihat p19.Book's name in Arabic: انظر كتاب ابن باز الوهابي: "تنبيهات في الرد على من تأول الصفات" ص 19، الرئاسة العامة للإفتاء، الرياض - They say Allah created mankind looking like Him in resemblance! See their book called “Aqeedat Ahlul-Iman page 40, 90” انظر كتابهم المسمى "عقيدة أهل الإيمان" للتويجري.

[@sayhimali6384]

@@manuelcardinali1287 See Salih al-Fawzan's book "Nadharat" p40. انظر كتابهم "نظرات وتعقيبات على ما في كتاب السلفية" لصالح الفوزان ص/40 دار الوطن الرياض. See their book called or "Halaqat Mamnoo^ah" Banned Sessions. انظر كتابهم "حلقات ممنوعة" لحسام العقاد، ص/26 دار الصحابة، طنطا. They claim that Allah seeks assistance and help from the Angels! See "Majmoo^ al-Fatawa" v5, page 508 (كتابه (مجموع الفتاوى) المجلد الخامس صفحة (508))

[@yamamotogenryusai7270]

and ibn Taymiya is not ahlus sunnah if you guyz dont know

[@MM-mr2gw]

Who took him out of Ahlul Sunnah?

[@yamamotogenryusai7270]

@@MM-mr2gw he sees Allah like a human. he said "Allah comes to earth from arsh just like i am coming down from this hutbah" in a Jumaa praying. after that scholars put him in jail.

[@sahilk8616]

@@yamamotogenryusai7270 Ya jahil this is a lie ibn taymiyyah was in prision when ibn battua reported this and he diead a natural death in prision.

[@FeikalAprieza]

So many asharies and maturidies are triggered 😏 Actually we, the ahlussunnah, have many sources regarding aqeedah salaf as salih as he mentions in the "Aqeedah Books and Wahhabis" video section. There are Sharh As Sunnah by Al Barbahari, Usul Al Sunnah by Ahmad ibn Hanbal, As Sunnah by his son, Kitab At Tawheed by Ibn Khuzaimah, Aqeedah As Salaf wa Ashab Al Hadith by Abu Uthman Ismail ibn Abdirrahman As Sabuni, Sharh As Sunnah Al Muzani. Even Al Ibanah by Abu Al Hasan Al Asharies gives an indication of his aqeedah following the aqeedah of Al Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal. You are going to question the asharies belief after you have educated yourself from these books with the understanding of ahl al-ilmi (ulama) Baarakallaahu fiikum

[@tayfunsaral5024]

yes Allah is above his throne, but the ashari dont claim Allah is here with us on earth physically, litterally, but rather by his attributes. if you read al hadid verse 4 it says "He is the One Who created the heavens and the earth in six Days, then established Himself on the Throne. He knows whatever goes into the earth and whatever comes out of it, and whatever descends from the sky and whatever ascends into it. And He is with you wherever you are. For Allah is All-Seeing of what you do." it clearly says, he is with you wherever you are. this is not to be taken litterally, this is because Allah sees us, and hears us, and has knowledge of everything, we say by his attributes he is everywhere. not litterally. i think the brother was confused.

[@mehammedyassin1027]

👍

[@TheGoldgoat]

Ya Allah, so many sect out there

[@محمودأبوالحجأبوالحج-س2ص]

🦋🌻

[@gamerkutingman7861]

1st

[@Mo9ala7]

🥇

[@herrdado3970]

At least watch the vide before commenting.

[@happyn7817]

We should accept the theory of evolution as a theory and nothing more particularly as there are likely to be more than one theory.

[@lmoelleb]

We do - it is an accepted scientific theory. And a theory in science is the highest level of knowledge (it explains laws and facts). Please just look in a dictionary, you will find multiple meanings for the word "theory", so it clearly does not mean the same in all contexts - like many other words.

[@happyn7817]

@@lmoelleb Please correct me if I’m wrong isn’t there more than one theory of evolution?

[@happyn7817]

@a Too many missing links

[@lmoelleb]

@@happyn7817 it has been refined since Darwins original theory of evolution by natural selection. So in that sense there are more. But in the sense of "competing scientific theories" no. Nothing else explaining diversity of life has reached the level where it can be called a scientific theory.

[@mbasemhassen2947]

Can anyone send the name or link for the channel that the brother refered to check out for seeking more knowledge into why the theory of evolution is false.

[@haseebtahir5130]

What's the name of the channel you talked about evolution?

[@funinfo101]

Dr Eyad Qunaybi

[@halden658]

Please add subtitles.

[@mohamedharris4325]

What KZbin channel does he refers to evolution. Please anyone answer me on that

[@yamamotogenryusai7270]

19:17 what book is that? i didnt understand

[@asiyah8239]

Salaam! The book is by the renown scholar Shaykh Salih ibn Uthaymeen - Sharh Aqeedah Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaa’ah.

[@Catacome]

☝️☝️☝️

[@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543]

us Muslims have to teach the right Aqida. Muslims have to teach correct Usul or principles and approach to understand and unite on Quran and sunna so they stay united and when they differ return to Quran sunnah and ijma to stay that way. They need to learn manhaj or priorities so they gain more than they lose and move forward together. If we are divided in belief we will be divided in acts but Allah preserved the din so why not return to it. This is even in history, the Uthmanis peaked in 1680 under the Taymiyyan turks, and after they left and sufi grave worship bida took over they lost land and divided to secularism while the exiled Taymiyyan turks were teachers to the later gulf Sunni nations. At the same time we have to avoid Kawarij who call Muslims non Muslims for sins and divide and can't even answer if Najashi is Muslim... So history has its examples in salaf's time and even more recently why uniting on Quran and sunnah and sahaba is key. Prophet Muhammad peace & blessings be upon him said I am the best salaf. He also said there will be 73 and all in the nar temporarily except 1 open and victorious on truth, those who follow me & my Ashab or salaf, not later firq like deobunds or bareveli. Though bida penalty in next world is more, it's in this world too. Allah ties Tawhid to safety in Quran 24.55 and we see salafis level graves & safe follow Sahih M. 969 - 972, they have other fitan dunya. While sufis follow sheuh & have tall grave and over run or mawlid bida. By Learning the sunna we avoid bida, even all 4 mathhab imams said verify our views with the Sunna. Also avoid the opposite extreme Karijis who make takfr based on sins and can't even answer is Najashi a Muslim Ruler ruler despite not knowing shariah! So proof is clear. It's easy to critique but truth brings answers. There is clarity in dawa. Islam is Tawhid & balance - Allah is over His Throne & His Attributes encompass creation like Surah 20 says. The ones of atheism like firaun deny Allah is over His Throne like in Quran 40.37 which is what Allah says after finishing creation in Quran 7.54. The idolaters say Allah is in creation. When salafis teach right Aqida, Allah is over His Throne corrects the false belief Allah is everywhere including najas we can't even do salat in, & pagans say if Allah exists in creation why can't He exist in idols and misguides.

[@fraze83]

Its my understanding the Ashari dont believe in "above" in the literal salafi understanding is because they fear Allah and fear comparing Allah to the creation, by ascribing a direction to Him. How does that go against the salaf? The belief is He is where He was when He created everything and He does not move or change, and He is as He describes Himself, and it's our duty to not compare that to the created things or actions. Just like we dont literally interpret the unclear verses. We leave the meaning with Allah, while salafis try to make them clear or simple by saying they are limbs or a created direction. Similarly to His coming to the lowest heaven in the last portion of the night... we know He doesnt literally descend, because that is an action that happens in space and He is unlike His creation and not contained in anyway. It's sad that you talk so fearlessly about something you should have more taqwa with. Such as allowing the comparing of Allah to the creation in the mind of one of your laymen viewers.

[@dontembarassyourself]

If Allah SWT says he is above then we can say he is above. If Allah SWT says it multiple times we must take it as truth. To be afraid to attribute creation-like attributes to him when Allah SWT makes it clear that is the case goes against him. Then what becomes next? you question more of Allah SWTS word in an effort to not offend him? I understand where you're coming from brother and appreciate the concept, but Allah in the Quran and Sunnah is clear.

[@visitor9408]

What is the deal with not believing in evolution? I mean why not just say sure Allah created us that way to evolve to our surroundings. Never mind I wrote before I finished watching to the end but I see often that many Muslim speakers reject all forms of evolution which I think shouldn't be done or at least it comes across as that way.

[@sofianhammachi8248]

نحن نتحدث عن التطور من نوع الي نوع اخرة هو امر مرفوض اما التكيف مع الطبيعة فهو امر مقبول و بالعكس فهو يظهر عظمة خلق الله

[@mohamedshiekh635]

There’s a difference between evolution and adaptation. Evolution is the process from one species to a completely different species. How something that doesn’t have the quality to be something else just change even after billion of years.

[@faizseid3823]

Habibu..but the word "istwa" have morw thann 18 meanings in "fuseha arabic". So does all 18 meaning of istewaa apply for allah?? Am getting confused here

[@raselrox4115]

Only classical Arabic meaning , you should look for

[@stylishspaces0]

*About ALLAH ﷻ attributes, characteristics and acts :* Let's start with the Istiwa' (ALLAH ﷻ is above the Throne) and then conclude some points Insha'ALLAH : ALLAH ﷻ said : 20: 5 ٱلرَّحْمَـٰنُ عَلَى ٱلْعَرْشِ ٱسْتَوَىٰ The Most Merciful [who is] above the Throne established. And He ﷻ said : 2: 29 هُوَ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ لَكُم مَّا فِى ٱلْأَرْضِ جَمِيعًا ثُمَّ ٱسْتَوَىٰٓ إِلَى ٱلسَّمَآءِ فَسَوَّىٰهُنَّ سَبْعَ سَمَـٰوَٰتٍ ۚ وَهُوَ بِكُلِّ شَىْءٍ عَلِيمٌ It is He who created for you all of that which is on the earth. Then He directed Himself to the heaven, [His being above all creation], and made them seven heavens, and He is Knowing of all things. And He ﷻ said : 67: 16 ءَأَمِنتُم مَّن فِى ٱلسَّمَآءِ أَن يَخْسِفَ بِكُمُ ٱلْأَرْضَ فَإِذَا هِىَ تَمُورُ Do you feel secure that the One Who is in heaven will not cause the earth to swallow you up as it quakes violently? And He ﷻ also said : 7: 54 إِنَّ رَبَّكُمُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٰتِ وَٱلْأَرْضَ فِى سِتَّةِ أَيَّامٍ ثُمَّ ٱسْتَوَىٰ عَلَى ٱلْعَرْشِ... Indeed, your Lord is Allah, who created the heavens and earth in six days and then established Himself above the Throne... Narrated Mu'awiyah b. al-Hakam al-Sulami: I said: Messenger of Allah, I have a slave girl whom I slapped. This grieved the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). I said to him: Should I not emancipate her? He said: Bring her to me. He said: Then I brought her. He asked: Where is Allah ? She replied: In the heaven. He said: Who am I ? She replied: You are the Messenger of Allah. He said: Emancipate her, she is a believer. [Sunan Abi Dawud 3282, Sahih] - The Istiwa' is known (mentioned in the Qur'an and/or the Sunnah), but the how of it is unknown , and we shouldn't ask about the how because we have no access to that knowledge, and we should start trying imagining how is this Istiwa' with our limited mind, we can't imagine the unimaginable who is beyond everything, and there is none comparable to ALLAH ﷻ in attributes, qualities and acts... ALLAH ﷻ said : 42: 11 فَاطِرُ ٱلسَّمَـٰوَٰتِ وَٱلْأَرْضِ ۚ جَعَلَ لَكُم مِّنْ أَنفُسِكُمْ أَزْوَٰجًا وَمِنَ ٱلْأَنْعَـٰمِ أَزْوَٰجًا ۖ يَذْرَؤُكُمْ فِيهِ ۚ لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِۦ شَىْءٌ ۖ وَهُوَ ٱلسَّمِيعُ ٱلْبَصِيرُ [He is] Creator of the heavens and the earth. He has made for you from yourselves, mates, and among the cattle, mates; He multiplies you thereby. There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing. And He ﷻ said : 112: 4 وَلَمْ يَكُن لَّهُۥ كُفُوًا أَحَدٌۢ Nor is there to Him any equivalent." - So His Istiwa' is surely not like the Istiwa' of any creation. We only know about ALLAH ﷻ from what He told us and His Messenger ﷺ about Himself, we should not start imagining things about ALLAH ﷻ or using philosophy on ALLAH ﷻ with our limited minds. - Likwise ALLAH ﷻ mentioned in many places that He has hands, face,....but surely His hands are not like the Creations's hands, His face isn't like the Creation's Face,....... He has hands that befits His Majesty, He has a face that befits His Majesty, He is above the Arsh in a manner that befits His Majesty We shouldn't try to interpret His attributes, qualities and acts... We only need to confirm them Because ALLAH ﷻ knows best how they are, we don't ask about the howness , we don't have access to it. We only say about ALLAH ﷻ what He and His Messenger ﷺ said without additions because our mind is limited we can't imagine ALLAH ﷻ attributes, characteristics, ... Imam Malik, May ALLAH ﷻ have mercy on him, said about the issue of Istiwa' on Arsh : ''The Istiwa' is known, the how is unknown, and we shouldn't ask about the howness'' And There is none comparable to ALLAH ﷻ in attributes, qualities, and acts So yes when it comes to the unseen that ALLAH ﷻ didn't tell us about Like the how of his attributes, qualities and acts.... We only say 67: 26 قُلْ إِنَّمَا ٱلْعِلْمُ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ وَإِنَّمَآ أَنَا۠ نَذِيرٌ مُّبِينٌ Say, "The knowledge is only with Allah, and I am only a clear warner." ALLAH ﷻ has face that befits His Majesty.... How is this face ? We don't know, but surely not like the face of the creations

[@Solemn_G]

Refer to the Tafsir of the Companions and Taabi'oon and leave it at that.

[@Mohammed-jf2sp]

كلمة الاستواء لها معاني كثيرة في اللغة، لكن تركيب "الاستواء على" ليس له سوى معنى واحد، وهو العلو والارتفاع، قال الله (فإذا استويت أنت ومن معك على الفلك) أي ارتفعت وعلوت.

[@faizseid3823]

@@stylishspaces0 okay habibi shukren...but welahy this is confusing me more..i not trying to start khilaf nor trying to make your effort worthless.. of all the persons in this comment you seem you have the enrgy to expain this thing for me... so lets keep it simple .. and what i want to know is "if istawa have more than 18 meanings" does all definations fits in when it is for allah?? If some of those definations dont fit in to allah then how do identify those fit definations..once i heard my mesjid imam saying "setewuu,istewu weaatedilu atime sofel awel bil awel".. because i was sure he was not saying us be above each other..so i started totry to look for all 18 definations and i find some of those?? And as you gussed already i found "sit" "lay" are among those definations amd i was devistated?? Habibi. Its not about the salafs or the sahabas..its about me ..as amuslim brother i am getting confused by this verse interpritations.. what i meant is "praying salat" "giving zeka" and other islamic laws are sime amd intelcually understandavle.. i didnt need to chek whether the salafs did it or not..because those rules ar intelectuall and logical amd ealy understandable.. but this thing right here.. the way you tryed to interprete is hard to my inetleects?? And i dont find it being logical.. i am not rejecting you but i ask sincerly for a logical approach rather than loads of ambiguious tefsir . Ezakalah

[@Strawberry40789]

So the vast majority of scholars throughout the history ignore and reject this "explicit" meaning of the Quran and Sunnah? Scholars like an-Nawawi and al-Ghazali were so ignorant?

[@نانونانو-ن9ك]

👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏🌷🌸🌺

[@jasc4364]

Not only should you accept Evolution, but you should also dismiss Islam.

[@mohamedshiekh635]

Haha and your sources are? Over millions of years, a consistent progress of creatures from one cell to multi-cells, from bacteria to human beings must have happened. Again, there is no observation that can prove this claim.

[@JamesSchrader-i7o]

I looked up: Does Evolution really exist? yes it does, then I found out about Debunking Muslim lies, right here on utube.

[@jamairo]

we dont deny the mechanisms of evolution, but dont take the evolution theory imposed by darwin as fact, as its a theory

[@JamesSchrader-i7o]

@@jamairo Elk used to have fangs, now those fang are small and called whistlers, those animals evolved . look it up

[@a.q3371]

follow quran hadith & sunnah then the ahlul bidaah will call you wahabi here.