Maybe these tours could take place in off hours so we could see more art and less people?
@Emily.Painting2 ай бұрын
👍👍
@milahhernandez73662 ай бұрын
pour votre prochain tour, filmez les oeuvres por favor........
@art-svan5 ай бұрын
👍👍🥰🥰
@ericswain41776 ай бұрын
A modicum offering of real art but mostly conceptual art lost in its own concepts begging to be recognized for something that it will never be.
@aquiahoraantioquia44145 ай бұрын
Maestro, el arte no necesita ser reconocido por nadie.
@ericswain41775 ай бұрын
@@aquiahoraantioquia4414 Si no se reconoce entonces no comunica y por lo tanto es un Arte pobre o malo y no tiene sentido.
@johnconn9824 ай бұрын
Finally, an honest comment.
@ericswain41774 ай бұрын
@@aquiahoraantioquia4414 Shure it does otherwise it would be worthless. There in is the Big Lie.
@violetaslavickiene6404 ай бұрын
❤
@calamarchipi2 ай бұрын
De cada 10 espectadores, solo unos pocos parece interesarles las obras
@user-od6yo6qm7f6 ай бұрын
C'est toujours ceux qui détestent l'art contemporain qui font des commentaires venimeux sur le sujet,ne regardez pas les chaînes qui en présentent, ça vous épargnera des aigreurs d'estomac....😊
@AI-xs4fp6 ай бұрын
Surtout des peintres hyperréalistes et des étudiants en art ratés. 😁
@kitefrog3 ай бұрын
22:23 nice
@omarmedrano92495 ай бұрын
arte decorativo, nada que nos proponga un coloquio con las obras, mucha imaginación y hay mucho trabajo en varias de ellas, pero aun no se puede dar la imagen de cambio o de abrir pupilas en las pinturas sobre todo. saludos y bendiciones a todos, viva el arte
@claustrophobeinspace6 ай бұрын
just art for rich pretentious people.
@wyzeyzere4 ай бұрын
So what?
@wyzeyzere4 ай бұрын
I hate poor and unpretentious people 😂😂
@franciscoalmadaramos306 ай бұрын
Alguma outra coisa interessante, mas nada de novo.
@tvpaintingmusicmoviehappyv70286 ай бұрын
그림을 구입할 능력이 없다면 조용히 감상이나 해라 아래 댓글들 니들이 예술에 대해 그렇게 잘 알면 니들이 예술을 해라 웃긴놈들이네 예술은 알고 떠드는거냐? 예술은 완벽한게 아니다. 수학 공식 처럼 정답은 없어
@MariaCJ-w8s6 ай бұрын
❤ So true ❤
@renzo6490Ай бұрын
So, is there no such thing as Bad Art?
@renzo6490Ай бұрын
Let me begin by telling you that when my brother was just starting school, he rebelled at the rules of spelling. Why did words have to be spelled in a particular way? Why couldn't he spell them as he wanted to spell them? He resented the rules and he resisted the authority of those who made them ! Keep this in mind. I think that Conceptual art originated with people who could not and would not do the difficult work required to become a 'traditional' artist. Can't master the necessary skills ? No knowledge of perspective? Can't draw? Don't want to have to learn color theory? Can't master composition? No knowledge of human anatomy? Can't render tonal values Can’t be bothered ? These are skills that you have to WORK to perfect. It’s difficult. It takes…..effort. You want a fast track to the exalted position of "artist “. Well then, belittle the importance of those skills and debase the notion that they are a prerequisite to creating art. Instead, create an art genre that you CAN do. A new genre. And let's call it Conceptual art. Conceptual artists claim that IDEAS and CONCEPTS are the main feature of their art. They can slap anything together and call it ''conceptual art'' confident that viewers will find SOMETHING to think about it no matter how banal or trivial the artist's concept! There is no way conceptual art pieces can be judged. The promoters of this art have attacked the motives and credibility of authorities and critics who might disparage the work. They have rejected museums and galleries as defining authorities. They reject the idea that art can be judged or criticized . All of this results in a decline in standards. And when you jettison standards, quality suffers. There really IS such a thing as BAD art ! We know this only because we have standards and criteria by which such things can be evaluated. It seems that conceptual art comes down to a basic idea: No one has the right or authority to make any judgements about art ! Art is anything you can get away with ! A whole new language has been created to give the work an air of legitimacy and gravitas. Conceptual art is 'sold' to the unwary public with ....."ArtSpeak". ArtSpeak is a unique assemblage of English words and phrases that the International Art world uses but which are devoid of meaning! Have you ever found yourself confronted by an art gallery’s description of an exhibition which seems completely indecipherable? Or an artist’s statement about their work which left you more confused than enlightened? You’re not alone. Here are examples of ArtSpeak: 'Works that probe the dialectic between innovations that seem to have been forgotten, the ruinous present state of projects once created amid great euphoria, and the present as an era of transitions and new beginnings.'' Or ''The exhibition reactivates his career-long investigation into the social mutations of desire and repression. But his earlier concerns with repression production--in the adolescent or in the family as a whole--give way to the vertiginous retrieval and wayward reinvention of mythical community and sub-cultural traditions.'' This language is meant to convince me that there is real substance to this drivel which is being passed off as art. I don't buy it. But plenty of other people DO buy it. Not because they love the work. They are laying out enormous sums in the belief that their investment will bring them high returns in the future. One Jeff Koons conceptual piece is three basketballs suspended in a fish tank. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Three_Ball_Total_Equilibrium_Tank_by_Jeff_Koons,_Tate_Liverpool.jpg Here is Koons' own ArtSpeak explanation of his floating basketball 'concept' verbatim: “ This is an ultimate state of being. I wanted to play with people’s desires. They desire this equilibrium. They desire pre-birth. I was giving a definition of life and death. This is the eternal. This is what life is like, also, after death. Aspects of the eternal” Rather lofty goals for 3 basketballs suspended in a fish tank!! It sold for $350,000. I wonder what it would have fetched without Koons' name attached to it. Or take the case of Martin Creed's ball of crumpled white copy paper. www.abebooks.com/signed/Work-sheet-paper-crumpled-ball-Creed/7404135374/bd He made almost 700 of them! Some sold for hundreds of dollars. Martin Creed, when asked during an interview how he would respond to those who say the crumpled paper ball isn’t art said : “ I wouldn’t call this art either. Who says, anyway, what’s good and what’s bad?” Interviewer: ''When confronted with conceptual art, we shouldn’t worry whether it’s art or not because no one really knows what art is.'' Is this what art has come to?? _________________________________ Something radical has happened to the art scene in the past 50 years. Cubism slid into non-representational art....what is often called Abstract. Abstract or non-representational art is a legitimate and often profound genre. But to many people, it appeared as if this new style had no structure, principles or standards of evaluation. It’s markings seemed random and arbitrary. Something that anyone could do. Any composition of blotches or scribbles was “Abstract Art”. This was the slippery slope that led to the abandonment of standards in art. Art is what I say it is....and lots of people jumped on the art bandwagon. Anyone can be an artist. Anyone can mount a show. And who is to say if it has value or not ? A tacit agreement has formed among critics, galleries, publications and auction houses to promote and celebrate certain artists and styles. Objects with no artistic merit are touted and praised . Their value increases with every magazine article, every exhibition in a prestigious gallery. And when they come up for auction, sometimes the auction houses will lend vast sums to a bidder so that it appears as if the work of the particular artist is increasing in value. The upward spiral begins and fortunes are made. And many are reluctant to declare that the Emperor is, in fact, naked lest they appear boorish unsophisticated Philistines ! This is what dominates the art market today. The love of money is the root of all evil. It has corrupted politics. It has corrupted sport. It has corrupted healthcare. It has corrupted religion. And now it has corrupted art. But, there is reason to hope. As much of the wisdom of the Greeks and Romans was kept alive through the Middle Ages in small pockets of learning and culture, ateliers have sprung up around the world that are devoted to preserving and handing down the traditional visual arts: drawing, painting and sculpting to each new generation. And when this craze for conceptual art has burned itself out and when visual art is no longer looked on as mere decoration and when schools that have dissolved their art programs want to reestablish them again, the world will find these skills preserved through the atelier movement.
@wagstaffe76 ай бұрын
No art, just a bunch of gimmicky junk.
@tvpaintingmusicmoviehappyv70286 ай бұрын
예술이 없다느니 허세니 떠들지 말고 그들의 창의성을 제외 하고도 작가들의 노고를 폄하 하지 말아라! 노동력과 많은 시간을 투자한 작가들에게 예술이 아니라고 말 해야 하냐?
@tvpaintingmusicmoviehappyv70286 ай бұрын
@@romacatholic 모든 작품이 완벽할 수는 없습니다. 개인적으로 저는 벽지 작업을 예술 작품으로 보지 않습니다.
@renzo6490Ай бұрын
Regardless of how much time and labor is used to create a painting or other work, it can still be of low quality.
@tvpaintingmusicmoviehappyv7028Ай бұрын
@@renzo6490 작품 수준이 낮다는 것도 각자 개인 생각이고, 또 그렇다 하더라도 작가가 능력이 부족해서 작품 수준이 낮으면 예술을 하면 안되나요? 최고 실력자들만 예술을 해야 하나요? 최고의 배우들만 배우를 하나요? 최고 가수들만 가수 할수 있나요?
@renzo6490Ай бұрын
@@tvpaintingmusicmoviehappyv7028 Of course, anyone can paint, draw...whatever they like. And the viewer can decide if it is good or trash.
@kitefrog3 ай бұрын
6:28 when did porn become art?
@coloradojoe6274Ай бұрын
When Andy Warhol did it.
@jaywillingham408514 күн бұрын
Jesus christ what is that whining ringing sound all through the video. I had to mute.