The New Sony ZV-1 Mark II Review

[@XOKP]

Always value your straight-talking reviews. You influenced me to buy the A6400 a few years back, and since then, you're my most preferred source of camera and lens info. I really like how you're not shy about discussing a product's weaknesses, unlike others who only focus the good and downplay the flaws.

[@Muhammed.Yaseen]

I'm also looking to buy the 6400! (still saving up haha)

[@ankera7460]

You make best Sony reviews.. I’m glad you got your hands on this new camera first.. great!!

[@banditalley9592]

Hey Sony, if you are making new cameras, it's not 2019 any more and APSC users are still waiting.

[@metaler4274]

We want eye AF + Creative look+4k 60p + NP fz100 crop camera!!!!

[@r41_]

@@metaler4274 fx30

[@marximus4]

There are rumors of a new APS-C flagship announcement in July.

[@banditalley9592]

@@marximus4 I heard - and I hope it is photography biased because there seems to be an infinite choice for video now at the expense of photography

[@JeffBourke]

FX30 for video.

[@laurenoe]

I'm excited that the new RX100 will be announced soon, since this camera is based on it. I adore my RX100, and I am still using the Mk3 version. When I don't want to take my A7RV/A6600/FX3 or any of my other cameras, the RX100 ALWAYS goes to the restaurant/train/plane/car/etc. Everyone should have an RX100 if you take pictures.

[@MuhammadKharismawan]

I have all three version of Sony Rx series (100 III, 10 iv, 1R) and I agree that the 100 has its charm, it's just so small and nice to bring everywhere, without loosing much at all too. The RX line gives different experience for each model so it'd be real shame if sony stopped making them. All three models severely need an update. And I hope sony doesn't forget us photo shooters with all these FX and ZV line releases. If they give what A7R5 have to any of the RX series model it'd immediately make them the best compact camera for their respective segments.

[@bantamgolf]

Where did you see it was coming? I’m so pumped. I love my RX 100. I’ve had 3 different versions of them. Def time for an update.

[@PeterEk31]

I had the RX100 mk3 for several years, best camera purchase I have ever made. It was with me at many parties, live gigs and made it through them all. Much more satisfied with it than my a6000 which mostly lies at home and collects ladies. However, last summer I left it outside, and it started raining so it broke. That's the only reason I bought the ZV-1 to take with me on vacation. I don't think the images are better, many images that actually feel worse than my old RX100 mk3 as it feels more unstable. Just a feeling, nothing I can prove as I haven't had them together to compare. However, the ZV-1 is better for more difficult shots where the light is poor. Video was the biggest disappointment, as everyone was talking about it being 30p, but realized after I bought it that we didn't have 30p at all in Europe with PAL but a very poor 25p which isn't good at all when you're out filming with it. So on many occasions I chose instead to make videos with my Samsung S22 Ultra which has soooo much better stabilization and much better fluid video because it has 4k 60p. When there was lower lighting than my phone could handle well, I had to run with the ZV-1 but only with 1080p 50p so that it wouldn't look bad, but you lose 4K in the process

[@Tugela60]

Pretty unlikey that there is going to be an rx100 update, because this camera line replaced it. It is basically a RX100 anyway, just without the popup viewfinder/flash and a slighlty cheaper build quality.

[@laurenoe]

@@Tugela60 I Disagree, in that Sony has pretty much finished their Vlogging updates and with the A6700 on the horizon, an RX100 update is in the cards. People like me, love the little viewfinder and other bits that make the RX100 unique. Besides, they still sell the RX100. Its like the FX3 and A7S3. They both exist.

[@MollyFitzBrown]

I've been using the zv1f for its wider lens and it works but I'll be upgrading to this for sure. The lens width is what matters most to me (about a pocketable camera). I have a zve10 if I come across low light situations, thanks for showing how they compare!

[@CartyCantDance]

Get the original zv-1 and use the ulanzi wide angle adapter instead. Trust

[@MollyFitzBrown]

@@CartyCantDance I tried it, was just too big and heavy for my liking with the add-on. I got the zve10 with 11mm 1.8 for when I want to carry a “little extra”.

[@CartyCantDance]

@@MollyFitzBrown oh. Team ZVE10 :D I’m not sure if I want the 11 f1.8 or the viltrox 13mm f1.4

[@MollyFitzBrown]

@@CartyCantDance I love the 11mm 1.8, it is super wide if you shoot in 24p but I tend to shoot in 30 which adds a small crop so it’s perfect! Then I stabilize with Catalyst Browse :)

[@CartyCantDance]

@@MollyFitzBrown I have a gimbal, so the stabilization isn’t a crazy issue. I just want the most light possible and maybe the bokeh of the 13. I don’t need to go as wide as the 11mm unless I get into real estate. I’m happy you’re enjoying the 11mm!

[@godsakes]

For my use case as a long form B cam, the original with the the 24-70mm f2.8 lens is just more useful in my likely use cases. The ultra wide in this new version is definitely more useful for vlogging but I wish it was constant f2.8 and had optical IS. Sony also missed a trick not adding more custom buttons/dials to this, I don't get why sony never included the lens dial they had on the RX100 which you could assign to adjust say ISO.

[@MikesManCave]

Biggest update for me is the USB C, the red recording ring around the screen and being able to swap batteries without removing camera from the tripod, the camera would be perfect if it was 10-70mm zoom. PS I use a Sony ZV E10 with a 10-18mm lens as my main camera, and the Sony ZV 1 ii is my B camera and EDC Camera.

[@artistjoh]

The ZV-E10 is still the best value for money of all the Sony vlogging cameras. I have both ZV-E10, ZV-1, and RX100 VII. The APS-C camera is the best and most flexible video kit, especially with a smaller lens. As to the 1 inch sensor cameras I prefer the RX100 VII because it has super slo-mo record times double that of the ZV-1 and that is important to me. Getting the longer tele is often very useful as well. When I heard that the version 2 of the ZV-1 has removed the super slo-mo entirely I thought that that is a very backwards step and all the more reason to choose the RX100 VII. Product Showcase is by far the best feature of the Sony vlogging cameras, but I have that on the ZV-E10, so the ZV1 II, and the ZV-1F are never going to be on my buy list. I will, however, be looking forward to the ZV-E10 Mark 2. Maybe it will tempt me, but more likely, since the first version is already close to perfect, I will take advantage of the price drop on the first version to get a second one.

[@finnharvor6773]

Agree.

[@Christophercoconut]

Helpful video , thank you so much. I can select my new camera for now. ZV - E10

[@gordon3988]

Lots of improvements…still love my Sony FDR X 3000 for simple vlogging though! Fun review! I actually liked the in studio shots better on the ZVMK 2. Good camera, with its limits of course. Does make me wonder if IPhone 14 may be a strong competitor though.

[@FloriTravels]

Fully agreed, Sony FDR X3000 is the perfect run and gun vlogging camera!

[@BrianTheCameraGuy]

Hey Arthur. I really appreciate your honesty at the end of the video. I was going to upgrade my zv-1 for this camera but the 8 bit color is a deal breaker for me. I know this is a small, pocketable camera but the 10 bit would have made me buy it for the 900 bucks. Without it, I am sticking with the o.g.

[@ArthurR]

That's a smart move in my opinion.

[@trym2121]

Just use wide angle converter and you get the same 18mm capability. A better camera than this sidegrade

[@BrianTheCameraGuy]

@trym2121 I have it and use it but I want something that fits in my pocket comfortably.

[@FireBlade57]

I sold my RX100M4 for the ZV1, and it was a great switch. This M2 improves everything I wanted, but the lack if stabilization is frustrating! I'l probably still switch and wait for the M3...

[@m4rcin847]

Yea, keep switching every week without even know what is important for you, like stabilisation. That definitelly will convince Sony to make every update meaningfull. Good job, Sir.

[@bondgabebond4907]

Put it on a small gimbal and you will see just how steady videos are. It's amazing. Something like he Crane M2 or M3 will make all the difference in the world.

[@trym2121]

​@@bondgabebond4907 might as well just use zv e10 if you're gonna carry that much

[@Tugela60]

These small cheap cameras are not going to get physical stabilization, they are going to use active stabilization methods due to cost and the lack of space inside small bodies.

[@FireBlade57]

​@@m4rcin847 Why so toxic? What makes you assume that? I used to be a professional, I know very well what I need. I switch about every 2-5 years, which is perfectly fine.

[@haroldtoups]

Arthur, love your product eval videos. Since you own an FX30 and the ZV-E10, would you recommend the ZV-E10 as a cost-effective B camera in a KZbin studio environment if I want to remain in the Sony ecosystem? Is the ZV-1M2 an alternative? Since I own an FX30, would it be a better investment to go with the ZV-E10 to benefit from the ASPC commonality?

[@berdugosocials9854]

Great content as always! Photo side of things how does this stack up to the iPhone 14 Pro Max of the Google Pixels? I think this is what this camera is competing against.

[@wretchedworm]

Mine didn't come with a charging brick? And ND auto only comes in the photography mode right?

[@apislapis]

It looks like a great little camera and I'm sure Sony will sell tons of these. Hugely informative video as always Arthur. Personally, at that price I'm glad I bought the ZV-E10 instead. How many vlogging cameras does one need? I already own a Canon M50 mk i & ii, a 250D, Sony ZV-E10, HX80, HX99 and a Canon SX740 HS? The latter 3 cameras are small, pocketable, conenient and fun 1/2.5in sensor cameras. Spending double the money on a 1in sensor doesn't give me double the quality. Having arthritis in both hands and mobility issues some days I want something small and simple to use on my travels. I don't rule out buying an original ZV-1, if the prices tumble, but doubt if I would use it for vlogging with it not being wide enpough.

[@vinniewho2173]

thanks for the comparison with apsc, however it would be more complete review if also compared to another most competitive pocket camera. for the portability yes i plan on buying this. especially i take a lot of selfies with family and friends and also regular group pictures with scenery and inside when it’s always hard to fit everyone in. what helps with this most common use case is this is the one compact camera that has by far the widest angle. pretty much all other compacts have widest zoom at 24mm vs others as 18mm for this sony! a first! iphone 14 selfie camera is only 23mm but rear camera is 13mm much wider than sony. another big reason i buy this over using iphone is when i need fill in flash.

[@rocketrollsvlogs7625]

ZV team is cranking them, as is FX, but we need a new alpha aps-c with a viewfinder.

[@ed_beltran]

Love the form factor but my priority is photography with my kids. The vlogging doesn’t appeal to me as much but I would assume great photo and good video for the price. In that case, would you recommend this option? Thanks

[@JohnScottB]

For photography you'll be better served long term getting one of the APS-C bodies like the A6100 and pairing it with nice lenses in the future (even if you start with the kit lens for now). I have the original ZV-1 and while it does take ok photos, it's not built for it from an ergonomic standpoint (button layout mostly). And it's not a massive improvement over, say, a flagship smartphone for photos due to the smaller sensor. The ZV series should really only be considering for video shooters. I use mine as a webcam and topdown shot for review videos. Hope this helps.

[@seancahyo9999]

@@JohnScottB what about the rx100 series?

[@JohnScottB]

@@seancahyo9999 Yeah I was going to mention that if you want to stay in this ultra small form factor, but for photos, a used RX100 is also an option. Again, for me I wouldn't get out a small camera like that over my phone for quick pictures. But I'd often get out my A6600 (or now I have an A7 IV) with a nice fast prime lens to take really great portrait style photos of my kids for a big level up.

[@dusty_burkhalter]

A6xxx series much better for photo and video. These cameras cost more and are deadend cameras in the fact that when it’s time to upgrade you need a new camera.

[@83442handle]

Just get a used older Sony ZV-1F used for under $400. That has a superior photography lens to the new model because it's a 24-70 faster aperture at the high end of the zoom. These cameras are 1" 20MP which is fine for quick run and gun photo work. Other option is a A6xxx series like others mention but that is a bigger setup.

[@ΓιώργοςΧρυσοστομάκης]

Arthur greedings from Greece, Crete. A nice camera from a top company like Sony and a topreview from a nice young man like you with a wonderful family.

[@ArthurR]

Thank you! I want to visit Greece.

[@AllThingsFilm1]

Although I own the Sony FX30, I am looking for a camera mainly for vlogging and/or my KZbin review videos. For KZbin, I don't need fancy features. While the ZV-1ii looks very good, I could get the Canon R50 for $100 less. And the R50 has an APS-C sensor. And with interchangeable lenses, the R50 has longevity built in. Things that make you go, "Hmmm".

[@ArthurR]

If size isn't an issue, a used ZVE10 or A6100 would be a bargain. But you could always go to Canon for less...

[@wakeywarrior]

Canon R50 is very poor. Look at Nikon Z30.

[@vvlad78]

Arthur, could you please set display brightness to "Sunny weather" and try to film in 4k? Will it drops brightness as previous ZV-1 did?

[@lucas_92]

Hey Arthur! Very nice review. What I'm most impressed about is the audio quality in your studio. What mic are you using? Is it the Audio-Technica AT875R Mic?

[@justinwehland]

Great review but the view things that kill this small camera for me are no optical stabilization so you have to crop to get a steady shot which eliminates the benefit of this camera, slower lens and a bit give on the long end. I use these cameras as a quick grab and go. I'll be picking up the og zv-1 for the wife.

[@Tugela60]

Optical and IBIS stabilization is best used for photography since they are designed to do small movements to compensate for vibration, and because they allow you to see behind foreground objects, potentially leading to visual distortions which are a problem in video. This used to be very noticeable in many older lenses with IS functionality when shooting video.

[@justinwehland]

@@Tugela60 yeah I get it but I'm not using these types of cameras to vlog with just as a do everything quick grab camera so for the photo side of it I wan stabilization and will deal with the drawbacks on the small video work I do which for me the wider angle doesn't really matter but the tele side can. This will no doubt be a good camera for a few just doesn't meet my needs.

[@prentrupathome5319]

Good review. Maybe you haven't still got the camera, but can you get a headphone signal from USB-C with an adaptor?

[@faizahmad3110]

I wanted for green screen indoor usage as well as for outdoors. But am little hesitant after seeing lowlight performance of ZV1 M2. And am still confused for under 800$ price range. Need some advices.

[@LexaLianne]

How do you think it’ll perform for astrophotography? I saw a video where the zv1 did surprisingly well and I’m not sure which one to get

[@mauriciodeer]

Hi Arthur been a fan of your content since I got my a6000 a couple of years ago. I have some kind of situation on which I had to sell my a6000 and a latter a6400 since I found out that it was just too much for me to carry all the equipment (lenses, gimbal, nds etc) all the time when on vacation. Also spend lots of time changing the lenses and everything. That's why Ive been taking pics and vids just with my phone but tbh its a mid range phone and does not take pictures so well and I was wondering if this Zv1m2 would be a good fit for someone like me who just wants better quality pictures and videos for my personal IG than the overall phones out there without having a lot of equipment to carry on. Thank you so much in advance!!

[@SidneyDiongzon]

SO. MANY. CAMERAS. haha great video dude

[@soumenbiswas1794]

A very honest review. Kudos 👍🏻

[@mirainoivuyo984]

I didn't even get the charging brick or cable, which I was glad for since I have so many USB-C accessories. I wish they included a wrist strap tho

[@dsalangsang]

Hi Arthur. Do you happen to know if you shoot vertical video that it auto orients in camera?

[@dougmorato]

I'm sorry but I don't get you saying it's better than the ZV-1 M1. It doesn't have 4K60fps, No IBIS, WORSE lens aperture, no S-Cinetone, no 10Bit... I mean, If you do ONLY vlog, it might be better due to the wider FoV, but apart from that, ZV-1 M1 it's still gonna give you a better image quality. So it's just subjective. It's definitely not an upgrade... I'm disappointed.

[@Tugela60]

Wrong. On small cameras like this higher codec specs don't really add much. All they do is make the camera hot faster and cause it to shut off sooner. Physical stablization is pretty useless for handheld video, it needs to be active stabilization to be useable. Or a gimbal, but if you use a gimbal then camera stabilization is going to be turned off anyway. A wider field of view places constraints on lens design, that is why the f stop value falls off at longer focal lengths. You can't have it all unless you put a much bigger lens on the camera.

[@dougmorato]

@@Tugela60 You probably don't own a ZV-1, right? Sony has a 10 bit codec that is not that heavy, intense to the camera (HAVC HS 4K), so it could be possible. But you can't deny they should've included 4K 60 8 bit! “The Standard Stabilization is not be useful for videos”, sorry but only TO YOU. It’s actually quite useful when doing slow movements. IMHO, as you can even add a bit of post stabilization, which works really well. In my experience, even on a gimbal this camera needs extra stabilization, so Gimbal + Standard Stabilization is a great combo…

[@Tugela60]

@MORATO I own a RX100, which is the same camera minus the pop up flash and viewfinder. The ZV-1 was launched as a cut down RX100 due to the ever increasing cost of the RX100 line putting out of affordability of the market it catered to. The solution was to remove some of the more expensive components from the system most users likely never used and release it at a lower price. Let me repeat: standard stabilization is designed to compensate for vibration while taking stills, it has little to no effect of the much larger movements relevant to video. By virtue of its design it is a small effect, for movements on the order of milliseconds. Your hand wobling is on MUCH longer timescales. Active stabilization works by using extra pixels on the sensor to keep the image stabilized. That is why you get a crop with it.

[@dougmorato]

@@Tugela60 I complete disagree on your take about standard stabilization. The standard stabilization has some benefits over the electronic as well. For instance the lower shutter speed and in low light. So if you want to have a professional look, IBIS + Gimbal is the way. So much so ALL high end cameras have IBIS. In my opinion I’d rather have it than not. Especially considering ZV-1 takes great pictures as well.

[@Tugela60]

@MORATO Optical stabilization is for compensating jitters, not larger movements. It has very limited utility in video. Gimbals work by keeping the camera in the same place essentially. They will obviously complement each other since gimbals can't correct jitters. Sensor stabilization does a similar thing as a gimbal, but for somewhat smaller movements. It is not as good as a gimbal however, since the system itself is not being kept in one spot and distortions can happen as a result.

[@bradl2636]

Does it shoot vertical video mode with seamless transfer into post? Direct streaming via USB-C?

[@gm9237]

I don't understand how people can be so happy about the ZV1-II. I don't see any real reason to upgrade from Mark I

[@raymondnist8770]

Hi - i just bought this camera for my daughter. She is going on a trip to germany tomorrow. One thing I can't figure out is how to have the background defocus setting to default to CLEAR. It seems to default to Defocus. This is not what she wants. She has to click the defocus C1 button every time she turns on the camera. Is there a way for this to be the default setting? I do not think she is going to remember to change this setting every time and thus not get the video she is hoping for. Thank you!!!

[@xWood4000]

This is a boring good camera, this is not innovation but what the ZV1 should have been launched as in 2020. I want innovation from Sony

[@xWood4000]

Atleast it should have been a similar price to the OG one

[@trym2121]

This vlog thing is mostly for indoor or tripod. No OSS and post stabilize crops it to 22mm... Might as well use zv1.mk1 and wide angle adapter to 18mm I suspect Sony is limited due to small size and it can overheat if they make it 10bit 4k/60 with oss. Lazy product design, they should've had just made it bigger

[@lennymo9088]

Arthur, what's with Sony sale pricing? I bought a camera kit for $1600, a week later it's on sale for $1000.00 then a month later back to $1600. I got the discount back from dealer but seems they like to piss off their customers. Thanks

[@hawkkim1974]

Man, your review on this camera is the best. Yes it should be $599! By the way, why don't we test it on a cheap smartphone gimbal?

[@SkyVisionStudiosLLC]

Can the zv1m2 do exposure bracketing?

[@traperobeatsofficail]

Am selling my sony z v 1f only for the audio I don't like external microphones should I buy this sony z v 1 mark 2? Or should I stay with the z v1f? Thanks!

[@viaPlanetNu]

Did they fix the overheating issues ?? That's what turned me off to the original . But 900 is up there And by looks , it looks way too cheap to be that high in price . I'm wondering/hoping Canon will come out with a Mark IV to compete with this 🤔

[@workingwiththelight3119]

Great review! I could get it as a take everywhere camera 📸 better than my mobile but for no more than £499. £870 for this camera is just not what I am prepared to spend.

[@CartyCantDance]

We need an a6700 with the FX30 Sensor. Why is this being released?

[@mikeagnus]

I have a small rig cage on my zv1 am i still going to be able to use it on the zv1m2?

[@bevinmore]

Not convinced had high hopes but now I would just wait for the dji pocket 3

[@ozielmelendez]

I’m still waiting for the a6700 4K 60 10Bits is too much too ask just no sense to go for two full frame like the ZV10 and ZV1 mark II and u know a lot people can said “go for the FX30” buts since I do both(photo and video) I don’t it fit my needs.

[@fabianlehr4318]

I have to disagree with your judgement that the ZV-1M2 is a better camera than the original ZV-1. In my opinion, it's in fact a severe downgrade: 1.) They removed OSS from the lens, which means that you absolutely have to use the electronic stabilization all the time, which leads to a significant crop and quite a bit of artifacts. Plus, even WITH active steadyshot, stabilization is still worse than the ZV-1's combination of OSS+active steadyshot. 2.) The new version is MUCH worse in low light as the maximum aperture zoomed out has been severely downgraded from f/2.8 to f/4. The original ZV-1 is quite usable in low light even fully zoomed out. The ZV-1M2 isn't. 3.) With the new version, you lose a lot of zoom reach. Maximum zoom is now 50mm full frame equivalent instead of 70mm with the old ZV-1. For travel videography, that's a really big downside. Okay, on the wide end you now have a wider field of view, but this wider field of view gets butchered by the active steadyshot crop that you HAVE to accept because OSS has been removed and digital stabilization is the only kind of stabilization left. So, you have a camera with worse stabilization, worse low light capabilities and a worse focal range for which Sony charges 300 bucks more. It's a bad joke.

[@Ferien7]

What watch are you wearing

[@FloriTravels]

Dear Sony, please give us an updated version of the well beloved Sony X3000 🙏

[@colinhoward2200]

Huh - how is better than either the previous ZV-1 or the RX100. They stripped it of optical image stabilisation and the slow motion modes, and then made it more expensive! It seems the most bonkers release Sony has made to date?

[@SVFresh2Salty]

So really this was just a firmware upgrade. How was the stabilization was it better than the original ?

[@ArthurR]

I never tried the original, but it looks the same as older models. Not as good as the A7R5.

[@zight99user]

Do they still make cameras with 20MP?

[@mylifepart2]

Nice...my video on it would highlight the fact that it's trying to get people to shoot straight to media ie no need to edit on a computer...I think we should all learn to edit...but great new camera for those loving to vlog..which is great...

[@NasrAhmadTv]

Thank you, my dear friend, for the beautiful Mboxing and the wonderful performance. Sony is a giant company in this field Your love from the Middle East 

[@akyerit]

It's crazy I originally owned the rx100V. I later owned the zv-1. And when I went back one day to look at my older pictures and videos of my rx100V I actually liked them alot more than the zv-1. Why? Not sure honestly. Maybe someone can tell me here? Now this newest zv-1ii for a guy like me just is not appealing at all. I'm actually more interested in the rx100 line again if I were to own any of them, and maybe to add to that I wish they would make a rx100viii? Lol. Bring back the FLASH! and a 1.8 lens. Maybe a 28-150 1.8-2.8. That would be perfect! I personally don't need a stupid hot shoe for a tiny point and shoot, but a flash on those is incredibly imperative! Stop catering to vloggers and youtubers and get back to making solid little shooters for shooters! I personally have zero need to hold a comets to my face all day. But I do love to tell stories. (And include that latest and greatest stabilization too!) OK I'm done

[@wakeywarrior]

Honestly buy a Nikon Z30. The most underrated ‘Vlogging’ camera out there. Much bigger sensor, better microphone and substantially better image quality. I compared the old ZV1 to the Z30 on my channel and there’s no comparison. Useability and ergonomics of the Z30 blow these Sony vlogging cameras away. The low light capability on this is better than an iPhone but still severely limited compared to a Z30 (or Z E10). I sold my ZV1. The Z30 is actually cheaper than this, that’s crazy. Bonkers to spend almost £900 on this. Would like the ZV E1 but too expensive.

[@damasovi_travels1244]

i really like this NEW camera and I want a video camera, or a B camera, but the price is just to much. I hope the Gen 1 has a good price drop so I can buy it, for me 24 mm is good enough Thanks for the video.

[@mortenandersen6313]

Jeez how many vlogging camaraes does the world really need

[@m4rcin847]

None, but why not convice some idiots to buy some expensive shit they didnt even need just for some extra $$$?

[@Minsetti]

@@m4rcin847 The boomers being bitter at not being able to make eazy money as social influencers.

[@mortenandersen6313]

@@Minsetti - not at all. l love my job, but respect all people that follow their dreams 👍 but for most influencers the camera is a secondary thing, so it's strange that the company's develop so many vlogging camaraes.

[@disneyanddaysout]

The dead cats always look really knackered in all American reviews of the ZV cameras. I don’t know if this is due to how they are treated, or that they are a different material but they look a lot nicer in the UK 😂

[@xWood4000]

It should have had 10bit 4K24 and 4K30 in 2023, and a limited 4K60 mode

[@xWood4000]

An enthusiast could appreciate 10bit 1080p but I don't think there would be any point in that

[@Tugela60]

The camera would overheat then. 10 bit requires 4x as much computation compared to 8 bit, likewise there is computation headroom required for 4:2:2 which would also generate heat.

[@AutumnBlair]

You make great videos. I watch your reviews for products I’m not at all interest in. 🙌🏼

[@KaioshinAemi]

no 4K60 is no for me. i’m so looking forward for 16mm and 4K60

[@tdotvideoproductions]

FACTS

[@SuperRaven79]

I really respect Sony for NOT participating at the "bigger, better, faster, more-challenge" for so many years! Ten years ago i bought the videocamera PXW-X70. 1 Inch 20 MP Sensor without 4K/UHD 50/60p or 10 Bit 4:2:2. Still the same. So i can still use my 10 year old camera without being ashamed. Same for the RX lineup. I think Sony produced many too much of this 1" Sensors 😀!

[@davect01]

Sounds like a solid update

[@BeZRules]

For 900 usd i would get smartphone with 1 inch sensor , more pocketable . More usable

[@Moriarty2007]

For me ZV-1 Mark 1 is much better, because of low light capabilities and wider aperture. If this camera have a 10Bit 422 and 60FPS at 4K - it will be a better choice.

[@AJCoReTV]

What is the F stop range on ZV1? Is it brighter than mk2?

[@Moriarty2007]

@@AJCoReTV Yes, only at widest angle they have the same aperture. In other focus distances ZV-1 m1 is brighter and better DoF. ZV-1 m1 f1.8-2.8 FF Eq 24-70mm. ZV-1 m2 f1.8-4.0 FF Eq 18-50mm.

[@xorrior4438]

Even though Sony is the best camera manufacturer out there with top-tier autofocus, low-light performance and tons of relevant AI features, ZV-1 II is not worth it. I would say they should just cancel that line. ZV-E10, however, is still an excellent choice because the sensor-size is significantly larger than any phone will be able to match, real bokeh is easier to obtain, you can get much better lens, add filters and truly start getting the semi-pro experience. What Sony needs to do is hurry up and release an APSC camera that does 4k 60fps for reasonable price then they’ll have another hit on their hands!

[@silversight9661]

A charging cable or/and brick "is not" included!

[@mehedihasan737]

Excellent Interpretation

[@JOTC]

So this is basically a ZV1 with a wide lens adapter... But with a lense that's worse. This camera should have been released 2019. The sad part about it is that people will still buy it. Sad. Great review though!

[@heatednemz]

Sony really needs to clean up their naming scheme. Arthur is right. there is ZV-E1,ZV-E10,ZV-1,ZV-1F.. thats confusing AF if you are not upto date with the sony lineup. That being said, I think this will be a great camera for people who just want to point and shoot stuff for video, Like my parents. I think this is also a great B cam for most Sony users for travel thanks to its size and formfactor. Give this to my wife, and she'll find it a loss less intimidating than a apsc or full-frame camera.

[@マーシャル-e7r]

sticking with my zv-1f🤔

[@マーシャル-e7r]

thanks for the review

[@AJCoReTV]

First the ZV1 F (fail) & now the ZV1 mk2 (another fail). Hoping A7C mk 2 doesn’t disappoint!!

[@tomytran91]

Your children are very lovely!😊

[@kienbien2006]

No 4k60 FPS???? So sad

[@ArthurR]

Indeed. Lost opportunity!

[@Tugela60]

​@@ArthurR It is probably due to the thermal envelope limitations of the hardware. 4k60 would reduce record times to about 5 minutes under summer conditions, which would be a serious issue for a vlogging camera.

[@Garbid]

18mm in FF equivalent? Hot shoe works? Then welcome for flambient real estate! Or at least for HDR)

[@83442handle]

Extremely overpriced. Lens is slower than the last model with no optical stabilization. Also no advance AI for a compact this expensive?

[@JOTC]

People will still buy it because it's "the new model". They give a new menu system and move a shoe mount around and charge an arm and leg lol.

[@techwatchlist]

Lol at the comfort rating. 😂

[@gamerw1zz]

At what point does Sony think, ok, enough vlogging cameras now, time to update the APSC lineup, aka 6400, 6600 etc. 🤦🏾‍♂️

[@ArthurR]

Lol I have these thoughts too.

[@JeffBourke]

Yeah. You need a cage still and a mini pod.

[@brentbrown51]

I’m happy with my a6000.

[@Tugela60]

Do you know how big a 150mm f2.8 lens would be on a 1 inch sensor? 😂 I have a RX100 M5. There is absolutely no way it competes with modern cameras.

[@MichaelTapel]

Sony: release blueprint prototype Arthur: so I've been playing with this camera for 15 years and here's my thoughts

[@xhenriquefps]

Common sense would have named this camera as ZV-2 Then ZV-E20 and ZV-E2 Unless they don’t consider this a “new gen” release

[@ArthurR]

I wont argue with that!

[@RajaKurcaci]

Wow awsome family❤

[@tdotvideoproductions]

No 4k60????? NOPE

[@kevin.itruth6880]

Nope. DJI, you're up next...

[@Patrick-vi9xr]

Why to chose this instead of getting today's flagship smartphones with 1 inch sensor? Smartphones got better processing power and u can easily edit photo/video right away in phone. Can't see scenerio where this tiny guy could be so much better than phone to justify such purchase, someone could explain?

[@nicuchitineac1950]

there are people who don't want to buy expensive phones just because they take better pictures, they prefer to buy a camera for that. The big disadvantage of the phone is that after some 2-3 years you have to change it, it stops working as it should and not everyone is willing to spend more than 1000€ for a new one. Instead, you can use a camera for 10+ years without problems.

[@hahamyuify]

Not worthy of upgrade...R100 canon is worst...took away flip screen😅😅😅😂😂

[@dusty_burkhalter]

This camera is a hard pass for me. A used a6600 can be found for a similar price and with the glass in the Sony ecosystem I’m not sure why anyone would buy this camera, I know they will, but personally I don’t get it.

[@adden2242]

im not a big fan of it, its like an updated digi-camera.. huge pass for me.. just Nope.

[@JeffBourke]

Very dissatisfying offering on this one.

[@davidpoo66]

"Back pocket" don't sit!😮

[@houssamreg9360]

Good 👍

[@mikepa7238]

The "new" lens make the whole thing useless even with all the updates. Do yourself a favor- get RX100 VII instead

[@nojustno8468]

3 words…OSMO POCKET THREE.

[@Sorennn94]

2 words Bloody expensive!

[@schulzkawlni6376]

First!!!🎉🎉🙋🙋🙋🙋