Paul Cézanne

[@joslynaarons6885]

What a wonderful presentation of one of my favorite impressionists. Pleasant lady’s voice which blends well with Paul Cézanne work and his colorful life. Merci bien 🍎🍊

[@arti-facts-4u]

Vous êtes les bienvenus.

[@SentientsSave]

The soundtrack is ok, though it is automated text-to-voice...

[@raerae6422]

Thoroughly enjoyed your presentation. Im amazed and grateful it wasnt choc-full of ads. Thanks for all the work you put in.

[@arti-facts-4u]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@ctaylor1460]

A really good analysis of Cézanne and his art -- thanks.

[@Zar2244]

Thankyou, i found this very interesting and your voice kept me from getting bored as i sometimes find with history videos

[@arti-facts-4u]

Awesome, thank you!

[@pprehn5268]

Another excellent presentation of art and you have improved my opinion of his contribution to modern art💠

[@arti-facts-4u]

Glad you liked it. Thanks for watching.😀

[@hananelatrkhashoggijkhasho4558]

thank you it is wonderful

[@johncarroll6847]

He is one of my favorite artists❤❤❤❤

[@soumitrachatterjee1572]

Wonderful narration.

[@renzo6490]

Were the nude male drawings at 2:07 done by Cezanne? If so, were they drawn from a live model or are they academic copies?

[@arti-facts-4u]

Try this - www.pubhist.com/w15929 and this - www.flickr.com/photos/vintage_illustration/50639077453/

[@ralphberman4208]

55:21 I’ve read a lot about this artist, and yet this narrative gave a better overview of his art contributions than other authors. Was the narration really fr. A Robot, how fitting ralph B

[@arti-facts-4u]

Glad you liked the presentation. Yes, the narrative is delivered via a text to speech AI.

[@fisch69]

I find these videos well done and informative. I also really feel the woman narrative quite pleasant to listen to .. the only issue I have with the videos that I have seen on this channel, is the very strange transition one scene to next… the weird looking wavy lines, seem totally out of place in this otherwise interesting story..

[@BILLY-px3hw]

yeah that black-and-white op-art is kind of out of place

[@ankhpom9296]

Maybe there is hope for me yet. I can not paint like the masters of old but my style is similar to that of Cezanne.

[@franziskazach7912]

I like Paul

[@luzarsacdetoro903]

He knew much about perspective: he did what he did to make objects come infront, reversing perspective.

[@nickfosterxx]

What the heck. The AI articulation is such a harsh counterpoint to the sensitivity and humanity of the subject, makes it hard to take in. Will finish this later, can't help enjoying the learning. One of my favourite artists.

[@arti-facts-4u]

Glad you liked the learning!

[@p1n3mont]

I would very much like to use this voice-over lady, be she a bot or professional. Would you connect me? Thanks.

[@arti-facts-4u]

speechelo.com/

[@p1n3mont]

@@arti-facts-4u Thank you!

[@arti-facts-4u]

speechelo-offer.com/

[@leylaery]

Merci

[@alanaadams7440]

If you believe you can't you can't

[@emilemontiere6128]

I am new to Cèzanne. Was he a friend of Van Gogh?

[@arti-facts-4u]

Yes, they met in 1873 and were friends.

[@brunellodaponte-qh1tg]

Jaime Cezanne

[@darylcumming7119]

❤ .

[@christophermorgan3261]

Is it cheaper to use a robot narrative?

[@arti-facts-4u]

Cost doesn't come into it. It allows me to keep the presentation voiceovers consistent between videos.

[@christophermorgan3261]

@@arti-facts-4u Hmm, Nice to learn something.

[@kimgapjin-art]

감사합니다 세잔의 그림의 정보 유익했습니다.

[@arti-facts-4u]

마음에 드셨다니 다행입니다.

[@toddaulner5393]

I feel like a fish out of water in South Dakota. Unless you sculpt the friggin' Mount Rushmore you are nobody.

[@triggerfish999]

I assume the commentary is AI generated. It's somewhat wooden.

[@arti-facts-4u]

Yes, text to speech. Getting excitement is very difficult.🙂

[@verenamaharajah6082]

I wonder if Paul was autistic.

[@alanaadams7440]

He has symptoms of autism

[@SentientsSave]

at the very least...

[@Zar2244]

That went through my mind too

[@dawnarobertson9577]

The same thought passed my mind. . .

[@SentientsSave]

The paintings were of course remarkable, the text was quite good too, the robot narration was tolerable (the mispronounced French names were not the problem: it was the misparsed intonation contours), but the separator curlicues were just awful -- like separating the movements of a requiem mass with the grinding of a jacksaw...

[@arti-facts-4u]

Thanks for your input. Later videos don't have the same scene transition.

[@Rachels123]

Conservatives always hold back the progress of humanity

[@artroshi]

Cezanne was'nt a bridge to cubism. It stands on its own as modern art and surpasses the cubists in nearly every way. I would call cubism neo-modernism.

[@ganiniii]

I never considered him a cubist but I can understand the idea of him being a bridge to cubism. His original style kinda leans into modernity and later cubism absolutely broke all pre conceptions. As many other movements its value is intertwined with the radical change that enabled.

[@artroshi]

@@ganiniii cubism is a conception. True painting is not.

[@Kerbeygrip]

The synthetic narration is awful. The content splendid.

[@arti-facts-4u]

Glad you liked the content.

[@CONEHEADDK]

The guy at 10.40 looks like he'd fit the fashion dumb young thugs wear these days..

[@markseymour8365]

58 seconds in and I’m done - what monotonous commentary. Is it AI generated or just a woman with an exceptionally boring delivery?

[@arti-facts-4u]

😒

[@Zar2244]

I like the voice, clear and just the right speed

[@markseymour8365]

@@arti-facts-4u Sorry, I just found it very soporific. I respect you for not just deleting my comment though - that makes you a million times better than most of the overly sensitive content creators on YT these days.