Average Indo-European Ancestry in Modern Groups

Most people today have heard about the Indo-European language group. However, what few people realize is that the Indo-European languages were spread by several groups that split off of a Chalcolithic population that archaeologists call the Proto-Indo-Europeans or Western-Steppe Herders. They originated in the Pontic-Caspian Steppe of Eastern Europe. Their DNA can be found in many different modern ethnicities around Eurasia (and Eurasian diaspora around the world).
This video showcases most of the modern-day ethnic groups that have a significant amount of Indo-European heritage, organized by their estimated average amount of Western Steppe Herder ancestry from least to most. Starting off with the Sardinians at 5.3%, to the Icelandic at 52.9%. In the pictures I included of each group, I tried to find images of people from these regions in their traditional clothing, so I can not only showcase various phenotypes, but parts of their regional culture as well. It should go without saying that most of these groups do not dress like this on a daily basis, and their clothing is usually apart of some festival or event of theirs. All of the photographs I used are from the early 20th century, to the 21st century. I attempted to get some diversity of sex and age as well.
Also, I have heard someone say that the WSH estimates in some of the Balkan countries are overinflated. Not sure how accurate this claim is, but I do know that some admixture from other hunter-gatherer and pastoralist groups can be wrongly signaled as WSH/Yamnaya, genetics are tricky. So, proceed with caution in the parts with Albania, Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, etc.
Music:
By Lotus- "Leaf Edge"
• Leaf Edge
Sources:
1. The map as seen at the end of the video, created by Thuletide, which included the sources of;
pastebin.com/NDs709ij
2.eurogenes.blogspot.com/
3.Lazaridis et al. Nature, 2016.
www.nature.com/articles/natur...
www.biorxiv.org/content/biorx...

[@MFvanBylandt]

Imagine how much more beautiful our world would be if we all just dressed in folk dress.

[@elwolf8536]

I'm really disappointed haw they depicted us English

[@masterjunky863]

You're fucking right

[@jagosevatarion8822]

@@elwolf8536 why? he looked like a chad

[@elwolf8536]

@Jago Sevatarion haha 😄 thats a public school uniform realy our traditional dress is far more chad

[@jagosevatarion8822]

@@elwolf8536 i'm talking abt his facial features and expression

[@vishalSharma-ol9fl]

Finally, a video that did not miss out kalash people, who are living in a culture that is probably most closest to how IE lived

[@dariusghodsi2570]

Very important subject to bring focus to, thanks!

[@thicclegendfeep4050]

So strange to think that the most prominent descendants of these ancient men of the Eurasian steppes, are the Icelanders, a people living on a far off island on the frontier of Northern Europe. It's just fascinating that their most prominent descendants live so far away.

[@niklask8753]

yeah because no one was living there before the icelanders

[@mr.purple1779]

No, not Icelanders. kzbin.info/www/bejne/sIeYiKabqsSUj8k

[@l5475]

Yeah no one was living there before aryan settlers so their blood remained pure

[@arthurmoran4951]

@@l5475 and becuase then they remain isolated and no other group across to mix up with them

[@l5475]

@@lucianpopescu3896 mesolithic natives are aryans

[@maciejniedzielski7496]

Beautiful pictures in regional traditional clothes

[@syamalchatterji801]

In India we use the term Arya for Indo- Europeans. My contention has nothing to do with the claim of supiriority of Aryan race by Hitler and NAZI philosophy. The aryans were divided broadly into 4 categories namely 1 the ancestors of Russians 2 the Iranis the worshippers of AHURA, pronounced as ASURA s in ancient Indian Sanskrit and 3 the North Indians including the Punjabis Kashmiris etc..

[@bod-essebod-esse4142]

Thank you for the nice video. Just should say that, being French, I notice that some of the photos of costumes don't quite match the area, e.g. there are Provençal costumes for the whole of France, and Breton costumes for Northern France. There are many types of costumes in France that differ very markedly from one small region to the next, and a French person can pick them straightaway.

[@tongobong1]

This video is totally wrong about the percentage of Indo-European ancestors.

[@thicclegendfeep4050]

As someone of fully Northern European heritage, I feel quite interested in the Yamnaya people, given that they are my most significant ancestors.

[@SonOfManu]

Me too, 100% British according to my DNA test. It definitely strengthens my interest too.

[@thegodofthegods1084]

Urra? Ura ura ura. Urra UrRa Ura.

[@thegodofthegods1084]

@Joe Bloggs So like who's Yamnaya? Iranians and Indians?

[@joepetto9488]

@@thegodofthegods1084 No one is Yamnaya, Yamnaya ancestry peaks in Armenians and Greeks at 15%. More or less all PIE derived populations are from Corded. It is possible When Corded Overran Yamnaya they adopted their language, or they spoke a shared language. But in terms of genetics, Yamnaya left very little legacy safe for a select for of West Asian and South Europeans. While Corded Ware ancestry is ubiquitous.

[@stsk1061]

@@joepetto9488 Corded Ware is Yamnaya; it's the culture that formed from the westward spread of Steppe Herders.

[@eshaansarkar2017]

An Indian subcontinental group, 'Kalash' have more PIE genes than English. It's really surprising.

[@Mishn0]

Since Aryan is a Sanskrit name for the PIE people, it shouldn't be surprising.

[@eshaansarkar2017]

@@Mishn0 Well, Aryan is actually an English word. 'Arya' is a Sanskrit word. Interesting fact: The word 'Iran' comes from the word 'Eran' which means Aryan.

[@Mishn0]

@@eshaansarkar2017 OK, "comes from" not "is". That doesn't change my point. Thank you for the pedantic clarification.

[@arjandino9106]

Kalasha are not ethnically an sub-indian group. They are people from what is now the area of Balkan, which, according to most scholars, emigrated in today Nuristan during the military campaigns of Alexander the Great of Macedonia. Their commune ancestors can be find in some peoples of balcanic areas, mostly the albanians and greeks, then macedonians and to some extent to the bulgarians.

[@sulaimankhan3457]

@@arjandino9106 No they are local people

[@igorvoloshin3406]

Hmm... what about Kurds - 60%, Tajik people - 69% and, especially, Bramin caste of India - 96,6% of Aryan ancestry.

[@julianblacksmith8539]

which nation are you from

[@igorvoloshin3406]

@@julianblacksmith8539 I am Ukrainian with Polish and German ancestry ✌😉🇺🇦

[@julianblacksmith8539]

@@igorvoloshin3406 nice to see u have rich Aryan ancestry, but why do u say that brahmins are 96 percent Aryans, since Aryans originate in eurasia 🤔

[@igorvoloshin3406]

@@julianblacksmith8539 there were ancient times when Aryan tribes invaded India and introduced caste system there. It's about 2100 years BC, if I remember well.

[@julianblacksmith8539]

@@igorvoloshin3406 but then how are they 96.6 percent ????

[@donnarichardson7214]

So the big question gets to be, since hardly any of these groups are over 50% Proto-Indo-European, or Yamnaya, or whatever, what's the rest of their DNA? Pre-Indo-European, or later immigrants? Since the further northwest you go the more Indo they get, is most of the non-Indo later?

[@vesnajelovac3951]

1.WHG, EHG 2.EEF 3.WSH

[@SonOfManu]

Mainly Pre-Indo-European, as far as I know. This goes for most Europeans, as well as eastern people like Iranians. For example, Iranians have lots of neolithic Iranian farmer ancestry. There's somewhat of a misconception that Iranians became "Arabized" at some point, but I haven't seen much evidence for this. It seems to me that Iranians just have a lot more Neolithic pre-indo-European ancestry than they do from Arab migrants.

[@TheMariepi3]

I believe that the author of this video is an Irishman, the Irish are obsessed with proclaiming that they are very Indo-European, the most indo-european of all the indo-europeans on the planet . In my opinion the Indo-Europeans had the haplogroup R1a (=slavs) (not R1b). Also the "Nordics" are not actually all Indo-Europeans, there is a hypothesis that the initial Scandinavians were people similar to the Finns, who spoke a language related to Finnish, but at some point there was an invasion of Scandinavia by Indo-Europeans who came from the steppes of southern Russia and the Ukraine, invaders they called Scythians

[@messianic_scam]

@@TheMariepi3 what is indo uropean any way ?! no such thing indo means from the indian continent, Scandinavians are not of the indian continent

[@TheMariepi3]

@@messianic_scam the Indo-European word or adjective has no relationship with race (it does not indicate that they are white, yellow or black people, for example, or if those people have blonde hair or brown hair) but the "characteristics" of the language of a group of people have Indo-European is a language, it is not a human race, a language with certain similar characteristics. For example: the word "father" id called in indoeuropean languages something similar to "pater", the indo europeans languages also had a large number of words to refer to large livestock (horses and cows) but very few to refer to agriculture or fishing. That is to say: Indo-European does not indicate what kind of race a group of people has, but what kind of language a group of people has.

[@addylupe5997]

Isn't it kind of weird how the places that are closer to the central part of the Indo European homeland around the Black Sea Steppes and later Central Europe are less IE genetically today than others more on the periphery? I wonder how accurate it all is, or if the right reference populations are really being taken into account.

[@tacitozetticci9308]

In a way it's just like American English is more conservative, more similar to Old English than contemporary English English

[@alkazaryyy]

You see the remote areas people had less chance to mingle with other people historically.

[@jagosevatarion8822]

@@alkazaryyy and a lot of demographic changes can occur through the millennia, even only through decades which we see is happening in Europe now.

[@LeodAskyar]

Its because they migrated away from northern caucasus, soon other groups occupied their old homeland.

[@kitemporal]

Yes, they moved throughout all that land, but then Levantines, Semites, Berbers, Arabs, Mongols, Turks, and general closeness to being in the "Middle" of every invasion that ever happened in the ancient world centered around the Fertile Crescent and Mediterranean that diluted the genes of the "closest" groups, while the more remote peoples retained the original "old" stock.

[@MrResearcher122]

Hitler would be surprised Russians are more Aryan-colloquially put-than Germans, and Irish are one of the most Aryan people in Europe, along with their kin, the Viking Icelanders.

[@henry1727]

Lmao what

[@famitsus987]

No he wouldn’t he called them Aryan

[@shreyaskumarrath721]

Because he believed in Germanic Aryan theory. Only blonde white people of Germanic heritage like western Europeans Dutch, English and other Anglo Saxon Germanic people were Aryans to him

[@pablito4762]

How are slavic people more Aryans if the Iranic and Indo-Aryan Sub branches used that term.

[@IranTalk]

Nice video! I make genetic videos as well, though, with a focus on Iran. May I know what calculator you used to calculate this ancestry. My calculations show that Iranian WSH ancestry ranges from 15 to 20% not 10 to 15%. Also, you forgot about the Yaghnobis and Pamiri Tajiks, and Tajiks in general. Also, some Caucasian and Turkic groups were also not covered here.

[@SonOfManu]

Yeah, and I accidentally left out Bosnia as well lol. I'm thinking about doing a follow-up video in the near future.

[@IranTalk]

@@SonOfManu Thanks.

[@HA-jh3cg]

Yeah Turkish, Uzbek, Kurds, Ossetians etc, many other groups I would like to see in the comparison!

[@TariqKhan-by9wg]

What about pushtoons

[@shahzadazulfiqar1]

@@TariqKhan-by9wg Tenu Chyn Nai Kity ! Tenu Pelan V Aakhya C Pashtoon IndoEuropean Nai Bal-k Hazrat Yousaf A.S (YousafBinYaqoob A.S) (Yuzasive) Ki NajeebuTarfyyn SamBinNoah A.S Ki AalAaolad Hain. Huun Na Kisy Nu Puchya Krieen , "Hum IndoEuropean Kion Nhi !" Ya Ye , "Jab Main Bara Howun Ga To Main B IndoEuropean He Banu Ga" Ya Ye ,"Khaoon Ga Nhi To IndoEuropean Kysy Howuu Ga !" Oh Bhee Ye Alfaz Alfaz Main Teri Thukai Lgany Ka Yehe Maqsad Hy K SamBinNoah A.S Ko HamBinNoah & YafisBinNoah Pr Fazeelat Hasil Hy , Same IseTrha SamBinNoah A.S Ki AalAaolad Ko HamBinNoah Ki AalAaolad & YafisBinNoah Ki AalAaolad Dono Pr Fazeelat Hasil Hy ; Koi Khush Ho Naraz Ho Jysy B Sach & Haqeeqat Yehe Hy.

[@lawkexarib4616]

What do you mean by Iran? As you know there are several people living in Iran such as Kurds, Persains, etc.

[@fightingelements4338]

Could you provide the link of the picture again, at the end of the video? Couldn't find the picture with the percentages in the provided links.

[@sltruth317]

Great video, could you do one for corded ware culture ancestry if possible? And also include ancient DNA?

[@sltruth317]

I find it fascinating that the original Rig Veda Aryans for example were more genetically akin to those of the Nordic bronze age, and in turn modern Norwegians than they are to most modern Indians (e.g. Brahmins, maybe Haryana Jatts are an exception.)

[@mr.purple1779]

@@sltruth317 Not the Norwegians, but the Sami.

[@bossschmutzfink9865]

@@mr.purple1779 No. the saami are 25% Siberian and have generally a very low amount of WSH admixture.

[@mr.purple1779]

@@bossschmutzfink9865 WSH were rich in ANE pedigree. Paleo Siberians, Jomon people, Plains Native Americans, WSHG much closer to them. kzbin.info/www/bejne/sIeYiKabqsSUj8k

[@thegodofthegods1084]

@@sltruth317 Definatly not Norwegians, but most likely Slavs.

[@anindyaroy302]

These breakdowns need to be revised because back in 2016 they came up with these percentages using Yamnaya as the proxy for WSH ancestry. Yamnaya tends to be slightly shifted towards CHG/Iran neolithic, whereas corded ware tends to be more enriched in EHG. Using corded ware as the proxy for WSH will elevate the proportion of WSH ancestry in European populations, and will have lower estimates of WSH ancestry for western Asian/northern Indian populations.

[@shahzadazulfiqar1]

Qabtioon Ki Baat Kr Rhy Ho Sahab ! G G Wohi Qabtiaay Misar Waly, Acha To Ye Indians Wohi Qabtiaay Hain Misar Waly. Acha Acha Is Ka Matlab Ab Qabtiaay Hindustan K Malak Ho Gay Hain , Ab Yaqeenan Ujrati Intelligence Agents (10 10 Rupaiay Intelligence 10 10 Rupaiay Intelligence) Wali Harkataieen B Nhi Krty Hon Gy ? Oy FaqeerNuma ! Tm..... Qabtioon K Bary Itni Gehraiaan Kysy Janty Ho ! ........ Ye Un Dino Ki Baat Hy Jab Qabtiaay Hmari Rayaya Hua Krty Thy Lykin Khany Ko Na Badshah K Pass Kuch Hua Krta Aur Na Rayaya K He Pass ! Phir Waqt Guzra Yafisiay-Qabtiaay Taaluqat Bht Sari ShakistoReekh Sy Guzarty Guzarty Bahimi Pyar Main Badal Gay Jis Ka AzeemuShan Mazhar Aaj Ka Bar-e-Sagheer (Hindustan) Hy.

[@joohimurmu1585]

WSH,CHG,EHG full form please

[@anindyaroy302]

@@joohimurmu1585 WSH - Western Steppe Herders, CHG - Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers, WHG - Western (European) Hunter-Gatherers, EHG- Eastern (European) Hunter-Gatherers.

[@bossschmutzfink9865]

Nah, I know the map it’s based on. It includes early Corded ware as WSH.

[@sophitsa79]

​​@@joohimurmu1585 western stepp herders, western Hunter gatherers, eastern hunter gatherers, central hunter gatherers

[@nezperce2767]

where one could find a Indo-European tribe monument geographically speaking?

[@yoruk8001]

Hello, as a Turkish from one of the 24 Seljuks tribes from today Antalya in Turkey I have 20 % Yamnaya, 12 % Iranian, 30% Anatolian 10% Caucasus Hunter Gatherer, the rest is non European, am I from the old Sogdians, indo Aryans or eastern Iranians ? Scythians ?

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Aren't you from one of the fake propagandist accounts?😅

[@yoruk8001]

@@papazataklaattiranimam no I’m just trying to learn

[@jboss1073]

What is the source for the percentages? None of the links provided in the video description have values such as "5.3" and "52.9".

[@Hejo-gz5zh]

An amateur vahaduo model is the source which is also false and poorly made. For example swedes do not have 45% while danes and norwegians have 50%. The indians and kalash people do not have 30-50% yamnaya ancestry. They only have 5-20% european hunter gatherer genes. Yamnaya had 66% and scandinavians like swedes 50%. They are geting false positives from a separate CHG source in the yamnaya genome. The sources mentioned has nothing to do with the amateur picture linked.

[@jboss1073]

@@Hejo-gz5zh Thank you. Do you have a better source for the percentage of Yamnaya in different European groups? I would like to see that.

[@loquat44-40]

What is the correlation of adult lactase persistance to the WSH genotype.

[@jmab721]

High correlation

[@jameswells554]

Having met the Nuristani, and fought alongside a few; I have to say they are a pretty people, and can be quite open and hospitable when they aren't trying to kill you.

[@thegrandknowledge1026]

😂😅

[@jmab721]

Kalash & Nuristanis don't have 40-50% yamnaya as shown in this video. Outdated & Inaccurate data. Maximum yamnaya in south asia does not go above 30% and its highest in Hindu Rors/Jaats of Haryana. Kalash & Nuristanis are more like 15-21% yamnaya(~20-30% sintashta).

[@famitsus987]

@@jmab721 cope

[@jmab721]

@@famitsus987 Writing correct data is not called coping. Dummy

[@jmab721]

@@famitsus987 lol weirdo thought it was a competition as to who has more yamnaya

[@1800JimmyG]

What about us Americans of random northern Europe ancestry? I'm thinking Minnesotans are going to be rather high with the upper peninsula of Michigan taking the cake. How would all that recombination affect the IE ancestry reading? For example I'm at least Swedish Norwegian Scottish English and German.

[@user-yt3xd2jl6d]

It depends on what ethnicity you are, Celtic, Germanic, Uralic or Slavic???.

[@user-yt3xd2jl6d]

For example, the Nordics are made up of two ethnic groups and their mixtures, the Germanic and the Uralic. The Germanics are descendants of the Corded Ware culture of 4500 years ago, the Uralics are descendants of the Corded Ware and the Asians of the Ural Mountains, that is why the Samis or the Finns or the Ugriks speak languages of Asian origin and not Indo-Europeans, they carry their Asian Siberian and Indo-European genes. Phenotypically the Uralics are whiter than the Germanics themselves

[@romualdmillermiller932]

In America Georgian is the most ancient nation🤣

[@bossschmutzfink9865]

If the map was based on the classical 3-Way model, Finns/Balts/Russians would score at least 60% Steppe ancestry.

[@Prometheus7272]

This is true I think

[@masterjunky863]

Would the other ethnicities in the video have more Yamnaya DNA?

[@bossschmutzfink9865]

@@masterjunky863 No.

[@bossschmutzfink9865]

@@jagosevatarion8822 did you get that report for free?

[@bossschmutzfink9865]

@@jagosevatarion8822 not sure but if you are interested, you should look into Vahaduo/G25 coordinates. They are probably the most accurate, available to amateurs. The results in this video are also based on G25.

[@ForsakenTVbutreal]

Uh… these are more focused the current state of he people living in the countries than the genetic origins of the ethnic groups. For example the germanic and slavic ethnic groups normally have a closer relation the the indoeropeans while the scandanavian groups (although their ancestors have close geographic and distant ethnic relations to the indoeuropeans) are not infact descended directly from them. It’s also worth mentioning that the west turkic groups like the oghuz turks and avar turks are also descended from the indoeuropeans.

[@henry1727]

Scandinavians mostly descend from corded ware lineages. I1, R1b-U106 and R1a-Z284 are all found in corded ware groups and are not from native Scandinavia, Neolithic samples from Scandinavia mostly carry I2 not I1. I1 is probably from corded ware.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

What a gibberish

[@robertolang9684]

@@papazataklaattiranimam ha ha ha indeed ,

[@serbianstallion8321]

My man you do realize Scandinavian people are of Germanic origin?

[@jagosevatarion8822]

Scandinavians are germanic

[@andremacko5408]

Interesting how smaller populations and island populations, especially small island populations, would naturally express a higher coefficient of inbreeding skewing figures to a higher homogeneity, in this case WSH.

[@jay5467]

Which populations have the most AHG/EEF type ancestry back in Anatolia?

[@ErPuglia]

Anatolia was inhabited by Greeks, Phoenicians (Semitic peoples) and Armenians back then.

[@jay5467]

@@ErPuglia I should've left a reference

[@dursunkahraman3817]

Armenians,Kurds,Zaza and Talish people are also indo-European race and language group of people,why weren't they included here?..

[@leoniegureghian4015]

Thank you Dursun 🌺

[@Hasik...-...yan-]

Also Tajiks

[@Phoenician_kang]

Because you’re heavily mixed with distant peoples.

[@Hasik...-...yan-]

@@Phoenician_kang you are in dream

[@bomb7102]

Except for Armenia, the rest are people, but they don't have a country, and they won't have one

[@bazoo513]

How wonderfully mixed our continent is! BTW, notice no correlation between language family a given population speaks and their actual ancestry. That's what complicated history gives you.

[@flintb6559]

It usually correlates, with notable exceptions.

[@bazoo513]

@@flintb6559 Well, there are three European countries with non-Indo-European languages: Estonia, Finland, and Hungary (plus Basque country and Turkey). All three have more than 43% of WSW ancestry (the range is from ~5% to ~53%).

[@k1r4z.]

@@bazoo513 Finland estonia and turkey also have siberian ancestry. Finns on average have 10-15% east eurasian ancestry (automosally) yet haplowise Finnish males on average have %60 N1c haplogroup which originated in north china, these come from their uralic origins. Also u should note that uralic origin homeland wasnt so far away from indo-europeans. Proto-uralics were mainly neo-siberian and a little paleo-siberian(which contains ANE ancestry prob) but when some of them migrated west foward, they mixed with those who have wsh ancestry. Practically finns have both wsh and uralic ancestry. Funfact: Sami people also have one of the highest wsh ancestry in europe, but along with finns, they also have the highest east Eurasian ancestry. East Eurasian admixture among samis can go even up to %30. Coming to Turkish people, its quiete different. Turkish people on average have %10-20 east eurasian ancestry, and %20-30 medieval Turkic ancestry. And greeks and other middle easterners do not have east eurasian admixture at all lol. Even east eurasian ancestry among anatolian turks can go up to %20 in southwest regions due to yörüks(nomadic Turkish people) because in seljuk times they settled many turkmen soliders in west coasts especially bcz those areas were hardest to conquer. So, oghuz Turkic migrations mostly focused on western regions of Anatolia. Also turkish people do not really have any ancestry in very high amounts. As i said, Greeks and other europeans and other middle easterners do not have Eastern eurasian ancestry in those amounts(except for finns, samis, karelians etc etc) So it usually does correlate but ofc not always such as the best example are Hungarians. They barely have east eurasian admixture, even ukranians have higher east eurasian ancestry than them. (Note: turks were never compelelty east eurasian, even proto-turkics due to their paleo-siberian ancestry, which includes ANE ancestry and Ancients north eurasian ppl had both similae amounts of west eurasian and east eurasian

[@bazoo513]

@@k1r4z. Thanks for additional fascinating details. But still, my observation that modern day cultural and linguistic heritage correlates pretty poorly with genetic heritage stands. We have so complicated history, with so many migrations, conquests, assimilations, empires growing and waning, that this is inevitable. One of the reasons I like good old Europe 😀

[@k1r4z.]

@@bazoo513 you're right but the point was theres theres a correlation even if its poorly but in some cases theres no correlation such as like hungarians since they lost their ob-ugric and turkic ancestry

[@juanfelixrodriguezvillarre3974]

What haplogroups were taken into account? Mithocondrial ADN or haplogroups of the chromosome and human? Because nordic people is population with more amount haplogrouos pre-indoerupean more especific haplogroup I like balkaniks and Sardinian

[@ver_idem]

There are only 2 sex chromosome X and Y so called haplos ,female and male,the females have only mT X inherited from the nanas,mums anf daughters and so on,and the Y inherited form the male line also grandpa,father to sons and so on.Females have ever XX and the males XY.The thing whith chromosome and human is only rubbish, you where thinking of course to the autosomal DNA of the other 23 chromosomes which is incompletely used to define from where you are.

[@juanfelixrodriguezvillarre3974]

@@ver_idem kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZmqqpIOmYs58gK8

[@juanfelixrodriguezvillarre3974]

@@ver_idem kzbin.info/www/bejne/fJawpWCIlJeqhqM

[@sinemerdogan6230]

What's the source of these result? After 5000 years later is it possible some people to carry %50 of their genetics from people who died 5000 years later?

[@jagosevatarion8822]

If they dont mix with other peoples.

[@krimokrimov6050]

some ethnic groups in Russia are the closest to Yamnaya , like Mordvins and Udmurts

[@mukhumor]

Udmurts are the descendants of ice age Woolly Mammoth hunters. Red hair, blue eyes, Pheomelanin instead of Eumelanain. Also found in 'Celtic' Britain... Scotland Ireland and Wales. R1b.

[@krimokrimov6050]

@@mukhumor Udmurts have some east asian genes but almost two thirds of their genes are from the yamnaya , and they have the highest rate of red hair with Irish and Scots but the Mordvins especially the Erzya are the closest to yamnaya according to some studies

[@mukhumor]

@@krimokrimov6050 Yes. There is likely to be some Uralic admixture in Udmurts.

[@famitsus987]

@@mukhumor Uralic people were from the European side and were close to indo Europeans they are not East Asian that’s not where the East Asian Dna comes from

[@mukhumor]

@@famitsus987 Yes, Udmurts speak Uralic and have a high percentage of R1b. 'Nowadays in Russia R1b is found at higher frequencies among ethnic minorities of the Volga-Ural region (Udmurts, Komi, Mordvins, Tatars) than among Slavic...' There are ancient traces of Reindeer herders in Britain.

[@anneonymous4884]

Interesting. It seems like a south-to-north gradient.

[@mrkslva4231]

Not really there are Indians and iranic people with more WSH than some european groups. This video didnt include Pashtuns and nuristani people in south asia

[@wezzuh2482]

@@mrkslva4231 yeah. A Nort-to-south gradient *in Europe.

[@mr.purple1779]

@@wezzuh2482 From Siberia to the west

[@PindusWrath]

South Europe was more densely populated by farmers while in the north it was mostly inhabited by hunter gatherer bands.

[@Mawnt]

As a swede i have heard that there came folk from around where Turkey is now and settled in Scandinavia. I think they lived by farming. Is this correct?

[@animewixx4341]

Yes, the modern European population descends from three clearly differentiated ancestral human groups, the ancient populations of Europe from the Mesolithic (10,000-5,000 years), the Farmers of Anatolia (Turkey) from the Neolithic (6,000-4,000 years) and the Indo-Europeans. of the Neolithic who lived in what are the Russian steppes. The Indo-Europeans and the Anatolian Farmers entered the interior of Europe and mixed with the ancient Mesolithic hunter gatherers who already lived there.

[@animewixx4341]

The Indo-Europeans expand from the Russian steppes and bring the Indo-European languages ​​to Europe, South Asia and in western China with the Tocharians, North India have Indo-European DNA and speak languages ​​of the Indo-European family, parts of Pakistan and also Iran, in fact the Brahmins in India claim to be descended from them. The Tocarians become extinct with the expansion of the Asian Turks, these are known as the white mummies in China

[@Mawnt]

@@animewixx4341 Thanks for answering!

[@jagosevatarion8822]

The neolithic anatolian farmers were not turks though, they were white people with brown eyes brown hair

[@blessed7614]

Central italians and especially Tuscans can peak to have more than 50% of R1B-U152 (Italo/celtic ancestry) and there is a haplogroup ( R1B-Z56) that is found almost only in central italy, related to proto-latins

[@jonjonboi3701]

How about the Turkish people? The Turkish or Anatolians and Thracian people originally spoke an Indo European language which is the called the Anatolian languages which are a subgroup of the indo European language family.

[@Auxblanchesmains]

Exactly originally that language branch is extinct

[@jonjonboi3701]

@Царят на мрака Thrace is part of modern day Turkey

[@BETOETE]

@Царят на мрака the Frigians came from Thracia to live in turkey.

[@thegodofthegods1084]

Turkish people actually still do have majority of their Indo-European DNA intact.

[@jonjonboi3701]

@@thegodofthegods1084 Of course most of their DNA are derived from the people before the Turks came to Anatolia

[@abhinavchauhan7864]

Nice video but one correction. Aryan is just a branch of indo european. Namely indo iranian. The term aryan DOES NOT mean all indo europeans

[@sltruth317]

We don't know that for sure. The word Arya definitely meant noble or Freeman in yamnaya times. We don't know whether it got an ethnic meaning earlier than the Indo-iranian stage

[@abhinavchauhan7864]

@@sltruth317 THERE WAS NO "WORD" ARYAN in yamnaya times in the first place. The word arya itself is of indo iranian original.

[@sltruth317]

You know we have a form of Aryaman in Celtic as Ariomanus? There are plenty of Arya cognates throughout Indo-European..it's definitely existed in Yamnaya times. The question is what were it's exact meanings during those times.

[@abhinavchauhan7864]

@@sltruth317 ok where is this word attested for the first time? That Celtic one

[@thegodofthegods1084]

The word did develop out of the Indo-Iranian branch, and they were the first and only ones to use "Aryan" I don't know why people end up using it for all Indo-Europeans.

[@DiatomAlgae]

Only percentage of WSH genes has been given - 5% upwards., The max is ~56%, what is the balance, 44% to 95%?

[@ver_idem]

It depends about the calculation method the so called algorhytm and of course of the number of datas from the people and the most datas revealed are from the "white indo aryans" also another big gap to fulfill,100x1k datas in comparison whith the few datas in your zone.

[@mr.purple1779]

2016? it's not WSH, but WSH mixed with IE- like hunter-gatherer. The modern map would be different.

[@Gaphalor]

Beautiful european brothers and sisters. Greetings from Germany!

[@zibacherzad2844]

I would call the Corsicans either Corsican or Italian, they speak an Italian language and became French only couple centuries ago.

[@greasyweegoblin1249]

The folk dress of the European people is so beautiful Slàinte mhath from Scotland

[@user-oe3uq2be3n]

I want to ask those here... Who named your continent Europe? What does europe mean? Which language does Europe come from?

[@niklask8753]

I think there should have been a distinction between north and south germany, seeing how dutch people are far more genetically distinguished from (probably southern) germans in this video

[@erik6280]

Das Ding ist, dass wir Deutschen ein sehr vielfältiges Volk sind. Wir haben allein schon wegen der Hansezeit so viel unterschiedliches Blut in uns, wie zum Beispiel aus Skandinavien oder Holland. Aber auch aus anderen Nachbarländern. Bei uns kommt es tatsächlich drauf an

[@thegodofthegods1084]

Yea, southern Germans like Bavarians are middle easterners anyways, northerns are like Danish.

[@ver_idem]

Why are the same Y haplos quite equally present in western Europe,Niklas are you refering about the autosomal dna?Dont forget the most germans who fled WW2 "back to Reich " have setlled in southern Germany.The royal subclade of R1b DF 96 I think from the House of Wettin is almost present in modern Royalties across Europe.People,genes dont have "culture",there are not tipically for a culture or borders of modern countries,as we see p.e. the genes of the Hungarians,which are in modern times everything but no finougric.

[@robertolang9684]

@@thegodofthegods1084 persians , from sintasha culture and european first farmers , cisalpine race the celtic race the aryan people opf caucasus , EHG , CHG, WHG ANDNEOLITIC FARMERS THE FIRST EUROPEANS

[@ghanambano6459]

@@erik6280 Every nation is like this not just Germans. All of us humans are related and very mixed.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Where are the Armenians? Even any Caucasian has more Indo-European blood than Armenians.

[@STASHYNSKYI]

Best greets from Serbia 🇷🇸

[@darkg5103]

Cmon man there is a lot of ppl with wsh you didnt add them

[@Veritas-dq2hs]

How'd you get 40%+ from Finns, they do not have high R1A or anything else considered Indo European.

[@Veritas-dq2hs]

@lolo gege ok that has nothing to do with my comment.

[@unique_handle_1066]

Finns spoke an Indo-European language before being Uralicized, thus Finns have a high proportion of Yamnaya genes

[@Veritas-dq2hs]

@@unique_handle_1066 Aren't they genetic isolates? And what are the yamnaya genes? Any specific haplogroup associated?

[@unique_handle_1066]

@@Veritas-dq2hs There is no such thing as a "genetic isolate" as all (living) humans come from mitochondrial eve and y chromosome adam. Just some groups share more recent genetic material from others. Specific haplogroups associated with the Yamnaya are R1a and R1b. This is evidence by the fact that R1a is found both in Eastern Europe and among Northern Indian Brahmins. I'm not sure about how material Yamnaya genes, but it appears people who lived far away from the original homeland of the Yamnaya (Western Europeans, Indians) have very little Yamnaya maternal genes while those who lived close to the Yamnaya homeland (eastern europeans and Iranians) have more Yamnaya maternal genes. However, it is important to realize that research into the Yamnaya / steppe culture is only a few decades old (a very short time from a scientific perspective), and theories about IE origin will likely change in the future as technology gets better and we have more data.

[@Veritas-dq2hs]

@@unique_handle_1066 Oh please, I realize we're all the same species, but there IS a thing as genetic isolates, RELATIVELY speaking. The Basques are an example of genetic (and linguistic) isolates. R1a is associated with indo europeans (but i am not sure how accurate it is to say that the Yamnaya had high R1a, I could believe that though), but the Finns do NOT have high R1a (nor R1b for that matter). Also, what is the evidence of the Finns speaking an IE language in prehistory? Is there a substratum in their language? You are making claims that I doubt have any basis.

[@irshadirshad1]

Wow, kalash have 40% indo European ancestry, interesting.

[@bevs9995]

wish we could talk about pca

[@eonthinker100yrago8]

You missed the eastern iranic(eastern branch of the yamnaya) groups like pashtuns,baloch,dari/farsi speaking people etc

[@robertolang9684]

i got baloch DNA , and i am Iberian

[@eonthinker100yrago8]

@@robertolang9684 during the peak of the Abbasid caliphate.a single empire ruled from Iberian peninsula all the way to Baluchistan.it makes sense

[@robertolang9684]

@@eonthinker100yrago8 in my DNA composition it does not come from that empire but from empire of the achemenides where i found most of my ancestors and they are all 4000 years old , i don't get sintasha and andronovo admix because of the numidian empire , your genetic knowledge is very narrow very narrow

[@eonthinker100yrago8]

@@robertolang9684 no need to insult me lol,all I did was present my hypothesis.

[@shojiogasavara5942]

Almost everyone is an racially mixed person. So, racially pure people is a complete nonsense.

[@shreyaskumarrath721]

Yes. Exactly

[@k1r4z.]

Finnish dna is so interesting they have the highest east eurasian and ANE ancestry in europe along with sámis but they also have one of the highest wsh ancestry

[@mikajokela1899]

Our Finnish y-dna (male line( is mainly from Siberia (the non-european component) but mtdna (female line) is from continental Europe. In fact we have one of the biggest procentage of ancient European hunter-gatherers (first people in Europe).

[@k1r4z.]

@@mikajokela1899 you didnt get my point loll

[@tpilot_error404]

Doesn't tell me why Finnish are alcoholics. Without that dna they wouldn't be such childish losers.

[@k1r4z.]

@@tpilot_error404 what

[@Prometheus7272]

Indo-Europeans themselves has 50% ANE dna, ANE would have looked somewhat european.

[@Kedeer45]

i think it's just linguistic connection i didn't expect genetic similarity

[@warrioroforthodoxy1729]

Proud to be a Scot a whopping 51.3% that a lot

[@BudgetGainsByJJ]

Yea solid number, I’m Macedonian ancestry, it interests me how you Scots have some similarities with us in regards to the bagpipes and the somewhat traditional costumes.

[@DivineLogos]

Iran means "land of aryans". So I expected them to be genetically closest to the WSH. How come this is not the case?

[@visi9856]

Name means nothing since "aryan" is a sanskrit word

[@aryaa7069]

That's because using the term "Aryan" to describe any non Indo-Iranian people is patently false lol

[@visi9856]

@Jiraiya Sennin that makes no sense. Go back to school

[@__Man__]

Iranians are heavily mixed with Ancient Mesopotamians and Fertile Crescent peoples

[@ARYANLUR]

@@__Man__ oh yes sir where is PHD

[@freepagan]

"Aryan" is a SANSKRIT word. It was used in India and Iran. ONLY.

[@shreyaskumarrath721]

Indo Iranians are aryans

[@stephanelafargue4709]

Aristo in greek n frencg

[@chandman381]

Where the heck is Dagestan ? Avars are like 40% Yamnaya.

[@samreh6156]

These traditional outfits are not worn by most people, and give a totally false impression of the people in question. Most Germans don't wear what is shown as their traditional outfit, which is pretty much limited to Upper Bavaria and large parts of Austria.

[@masterjunky863]

We are talking about ethnicities, so it's right to show people in their traditional clothes.

[@samreh6156]

@@masterjunky863 Look, I am Bavarian and have never worn outfits like that, and neither has the majority of Bavarians. What would a person from Chicago or Cleveland wear?

[@masterjunky863]

@@samreh6156 You should, don't let your culture and tradition die! I hope at least you can speak Bavarian (that is a language and not a dialect of German). However Americans have no tradition or ethnic culture, so they don't have a real traditional dress like us European ethnicities.

[@samreh6156]

@@masterjunky863 You are a romantic. Of course, I speak Oberbayrisch, but not like my grandparents spoke, and, believe it or not, most people living in Bavaria don't speak it. They speak mostly standard German, Hochdeutsch, though their accent will probably tell you where they are from.

[@masterjunky863]

@@samreh6156 Yes, I'm indeed a romantic. I know most people there don't speak it, it's the same here in Lombardy (northern Italy), most of young people don't speak the Lombard language. It's really sad the way we are losing our tradition to be part of a shitty Americanized globalist world.

[@eshaansarkar2017]

Another important thing to be noted is that Skin colour isn't totally based on Genes but also on Exposure to sun.

[@raakavoima-yk4ry]

And skin color is one of the smallest difference between races... If black full blooded african and white european would have same shape of skin color, you would easily notice the difference and europeans would still be the creators of 90% of all world inventions and achivement etc

[@dustybawls7085]

Ofcourse due to melanin

[@eshaansarkar2017]

@@dustybawls7085 That's not what I meant. I meant that Melanin secretion depends upon both Exposure and Background.

[@dustybawls7085]

@@eshaansarkar2017 kk

[@robertolang9684]

AND SEA WATER

[@claudemontalbano3381]

ces pourcentages sont faux! L'haplogroupe R et sa sous-clade R1b (indo-européen ou Yamna) de la lignée Y, qui est devenu typique de l'européen depuis 3 à 4000 ans avant JC, est prédominant avec environ 50% en Allemagne, en Italie, en France, en Espagne et bien sûr plus encore en Grande Bretagne. C'est l'haplogroupe I le plus ancien d'Europe qui est dominant en Scandinavie, Balkans et Sardaigne

[@truthseeker9958]

You missed out the Turkish people

[@willia451]

I'm 98% Welsh and English, baby. Top 10. Suck it.

[@TariqKhan-by9wg]

What does WSH ancestry means

[@HA-jh3cg]

Western Steppe Herders, the nomadic chariot riding warriors from what is now roughly Ukraine/Southern Russia. If you are a pashtoon then there is high chance they were your father's father's father's going back a few thousand years

[@Vlognayshyall]

@@HA-jh3cg WSH were not chariot riders. Chariot riding is related to later Sintashta culture which descend from Corded Ware, which descend from WSH. Iranic groups do descend from Sintashta though. WSH were semi-nomadic wagon-drivers who would've hunted and fought on foot. (See Sredny Stog or Khvalynsk cultures for best examples of true WSH populations, those are ancestors of Corded Ware (main spreaders of IE) and Yamnaya)

[@HA-jh3cg]

@@Vlognayshyall thanks for pointing this out, you are spot on, my bad

[@shahzadazulfiqar1]

@@HA-jh3cg 😅😄🤣😂😁😀 Well Replied. Ayhnu Samjhaya Ayhnu Samajh Na Aya 😅😄🤣😂😁😀

[@HA-jh3cg]

@@Vlognayshyall Is it true that the greeks and Armenians primarily have yamnaya ancestry, whilst the rest of us IE speakers have more corded ware ancestry?

[@adityarajan592]

Interesting that Finland, which speaks a non indo european language has one of the highest

[@supermavro6072]

They are Uralo Altaic not Indo-European.

[@k1r4z.]

The origin of uralic and indo-europeans people arent way away lol. You have to add that, yes the proto-uralics were mainly neo-siberian but after proto-finno-ugrics moved west foward, they mixed with those who have high wsh ancestry so now thats why Finns now have the highest East Eurasian (due to their neo-siberian ancestry) in europe but they also have high wsh ancestry

[@borivoj_navratil]

Their ancestors are for the most part indoeuropeans, so nothing is particularly odd about it.

[@supermavro6072]

@@borivoj_navratil No, It's not

[@borivoj_navratil]

@@supermavro6072 Yes, predominantly Indo-Europeans speaking the Finnic language they switched to at one point in time.

[@zibacherzad2844]

You mean Sardinian?

[@passokita]

So we can conclude that northern Germanic people and specially celtic descendants people are the closest ones to the PIE ancestors?

[@decekfrokfr3mdx]

Yes, but important to note that Celts are not Germanic

[@borivoj_navratil]

Northern germanics, the celts and the northern slavs

[@robertolang9684]

@@decekfrokfr3mdx no ? so from where that Celtic foocktards come from ? Hallstatt and la tene was the only clues that geneticists found about the origin of the Celts a crazy amurikon guy come recently saying they come from north afrika passing by iberia but no dna traces have been found so far in marroco or north afrika , there is some Egyptian DNA trail but it follows the Minoan and Mycenaean trail in Balkans

[@bossschmutzfink9865]

No. Slavs and Finns are.

[@dovmontAh]

Просматривается четкая зависимость от процентного наличия гаплогруппы R1a1 от направления на север и северо-восток. Однако должен заметить, что в Беларуси нет сейчас такого флага, какой был указан у вас в ролике! Когда-то был, но на референдуме в 1995г. от него отказались, так что не следует приписывать всем белорусам хотелки беглых националистов.

[@govindseebun4905]

I wont simplify the Indian part as simply Northern Indian. I think North West Indian (Punjab region, etc) people have higher percentage of WSH dna than the rest of India.

[@qaimaqyakh2708]

That video is obsolete whatsoever Indians whether northern or southern never go over 15-20%, only some really isolated groups but than again since they always have high ancestral Indian ancestry (over 30%) they're not racially Eurasian and can't even be compared to Pontic Caspian Steppe people who where fully Eurasian.

[@julianblacksmith8539]

@@qaimaqyakh2708 what about the jats how much ancestry do you think they have

[@jmab721]

@@julianblacksmith8539 Don't ask him, he'll spread misinformation. Muslims Jutts of Pakistan are 26% steppeMLBA on average, their AASI is 24-25%. Rest of their ancestry is IVC/BMAC. Sikh Jatts from Indian Punjab are 27-34% steppeMLBA usually, their AASI is 20-22%. Rest is IVC/BMAC. Hindu Jaats of Haryana/Delhi NCR are 32-40% steppeMLBA usually, their AASI is 17-21%. Rest is IVC/BMAC ancestry. And Hindu Rors of Haryana are 35-45% steppeMLBA usually, their AASI is 15-21%. Rest is IVC/BMAC. Kambojas who are spread in Haryana/Punjab/Himachal/Jammu/Chandigarh are 24-30% steppeMLBA and their AASI is 14-19%. Rest is BMAC/IVC. *****None of these above groups are higher castes. Historically, they have had either low caste status or have been just non-followers of caste system altogether. Brahmins with lesser steppe ancestry & much higher AASI ancestry are higher in caste status than these groups. This needs to be told to euro supremacists who love to associate higher caste status with steppe.****** Khatris who are spread in Punjab/Haryana/Delhi NCR/Himachal/Jammu are 25% steppeMLBA on average, 20% AASI. Rest of their ancestry being BMAC/IVC. Those Bollywood families with last names like Kapoor/Khanna are khatris. Look up celebs like Twinkle Khanna, Kareena Kapoor, Ranbir Kapoor, Shanaya Kapoor for context. AND NO, they're not the whitest *liGhtEst bRighTeSt rAre* Indians as many people like to spread this wrong narrative. They are just SUB-GROUPS of khatris from North who were successful in setting up their families while founding Bollywood in Mumbai. Plenty of even lighter Indians than them exist in above Delhi region of India. For reference... Kalash of Chitral Valley in Pakistan, who follow some form of ancient hinduism, are 25-30% steppeMLBA, their AASI is 0-10%. Rest is BMAC/IVC.

[@julianblacksmith8539]

@@jmab721 wow thanks for the insight, this really surprised me how Jatts is Pakistan have less WSH DNA than people in haryana, since it falls more further south. Hard to believe that the Rors could have as much WSH as Germans, which is 45 percent WSH i believe.

[@jmab721]

@@julianblacksmith8539 No, notice that I mentioned MLBA, and not EMBA. WSH is steppeEMBA. It is the MLBA ancestry from which we have to calculate WSH among south asians/central asians/Iranians. 70% of this MLBA is WSH. Which means that Rors are maximum 31% WSH, and not higher than that. And usually hindu Jaats/Rors of Haryana 25-30% WSH. Maximum yamnaya(WSH) is taken as 30% for south asia. That's the maximum limit. Northern Europeans are 40-50% of this same WSH ancestry. The decreasing importance of endogamy can be a factor as to why hindu jaats of Delhi/Haryana region are most steppe, then it is sikh jatts of Indian punjab, and then least of these 3 are muslim jutts of Pak Punjab.

[@dharmrakshak6735]

I like to know about the gene of WSH ancestry,Can anyone answer?

[@robertolang9684]

😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@jagosevatarion8822]

WSH = western steppe herder. Means also proto indo-european

[@SponsorShort]

I don't think haplagroups are very accurate. We don't even know where Proto indo Europeans lived, let alone have genetic samples from them. They emmigrated to regions where there was already stablished populations with defined life styles and forced their language on rhem. So it must be low percentage in Europe(with higher population at the time of neolithic period) and higher in western Asia, not the other way.

[@Kedeer45]

According to the latest studies of archaeologists, it is thought to be the zagros mountains, not the ukrain

[@julianblacksmith8539]

It surprises me how north India could have more WSH ancestory then the Greeks Italian french people, since India is so far away 🤔

[@stormtrooper8420]

Norther Indians have only 10 to 20% While most average Indians don't even have 10%

[@markusmath3421]

@Arif he's not Indian lol

[@markusmath3421]

@@stormtrooper8420 highest is up to 30% iirc

[@Tea-oz4iy]

​@@stormtrooper8420 Umm average is the case for i guess for rest of the countries in North India average is 20% but Highest is 45% which is present in different communities.

[@stormtrooper8420]

@@Tea-oz4iy no the average is less 10%. It's high among higher caste north indians

[@sigmahacker1]

Irish and Icelandic are closest to Western Steppe Herders. But Aren't they all R1b. We are not R1b but R1a1a z93

[@robertolang9684]

western steppe herders ? where i heard that in genetics ? so the steep herders come from western europe ?, holly cow i'm getting confused

[@sigmahacker1]

@@robertolang9684 no they don't come from Europe.They are postulated to come from pontic caspian steppe.

[@alexandrejoly7693]

I seriously doubt Northern Indians are 20-30 percent *western* steppe herder (e.g. Yamnaya). They could be 20-30% *central* steppe herder (e.g. Sintashta) however. That's something I see everywhere, people talking about steppe ancestry and mixing up steppe EMBA & steppe MLBA (which is only 60% steppe EMBA). 12-18% WSH should be closer to reality. I haven't watched the rest of the video but I assume you made the same mistake for the other Asian populations.

[@reddragon100]

indian have slightly more WSH than Steppe_MLBA as IVC itself had some siberian HG ancestry at 10%.

[@MeatGoblin88]

he did make that mistake and kind of corrected it in a later video. south asians barely have any steppe dna left because the regions were already populated, even the brahmins have lower steppe dna than southern europeans.

[@demi9826]

The more you are blonde the more you have steppe related ancestry aka indo european

[@mrkslva4231]

Thats way wrong

[@demi9826]

@@mrkslva4231 then why the Nordic have the highest aryan ancestry

[@demi9826]

@@mrkslva4231 lol

[@demi9826]

Aryan means white

[@mrkslva4231]

@@demi9826 Aryan means noble Are u american lol😂

[@WastedBananas]

where is Armenian?

[@elwolf8536]

Lol

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@joannadephinelim9445]

What does WSH Ancestry mean?

[@bruceketta9144]

WSH = Western Steppe Harder, a synonym for yamna/yamnaya

[@kosovosrbij6135]

Why did you put fake Belarus flag? Are you making some political statement?

[@ArghyadipGhosh]

Aryans were only the ancient indo-Iranian sub group of indo Europeans. You’re spreading misinformation by designating the entire indo-European people as Aryan

[@JonOmega-mf4dm]

They originated in Eastern Europe whose one branch went to India via Central Asia and mixed with IVC women who were darker in looks but caucasian in looks due to Neolithic Iran dna .

[@user-yt3xd2jl6d]

@@JonOmega-mf4dm The ancestral matrix of Haplogroup R originates in Central Asia, migrates to the Altai giving rise to the mal'ta buret culture, this human group spreads through Central Asia and the Americas, reaches India and eastern Europe, from eastern Europe the Proto-Indo-Europeans originate

[@JonOmega-mf4dm]

@@user-yt3xd2jl6d I was talking about proto indo Europeans only because Indians have ne euro dna while Europeans don't have any Indian dna

[@user-yt3xd2jl6d]

@@JonOmega-mf4dm Yes, Indians and Europeans share DNA with the Ancient North Eurasian an ancient form of Siberian, later East-Central Asian European DNA was inherited by Indians, but Europeans did not inherit DNA from the Indian subcontinent

[@JonOmega-mf4dm]

@@user-yt3xd2jl6d Yes you are right

[@zadeh79]

IE in Europe is associated with Yamnaya migrations, not Western Hunter Gatherer. According to the bulk of genetic evidence, which has accumulated in the past 10 years, and brought forth with the Max Plank Institute and independently from researchers like David Reich and Yosef Lazoridis, the Yamnaya themselves are 50% rooted in the original PIE populations that lived in the nexus between South Caucasus populations, including NW Iran, Armenia, and E. Turkey.

[@tanhukim9963]

Yo. TURKEY Caucasian DNA.

[@smokeyhoodoo]

That says western steppe herder

[@supermavro6072]

Caucasians are actually Turkic Mongoloid, they're nothing like you imagined.

[@bossschmutzfink9865]

Not 50. More like 35 and the initial Indo European Speakers were likely of EHG stock.

[@aryafarn]

it was Sintashta culture with its R1a that spreaded I.E. language to the World ! not Yamnay which had R1b- which itself belongs to P.I.E. caicasian aborigians. R1b only later accepted I.E. language from R1a peoples. (Sintashta ).

[@CA-jz9bm]

Not sure why used used globohomo flag for Belarus

[@wegfarir1963]

To save you time, with rough but accurate estimates based on appearance, history, archaeology, linguistics, etc. Baltic, excluding Estonia - 80-90% Poland/Slovakia - 80% Scandinavia - 70-80%, Iceland and other Nordic islands being around 60-70% Germanic areas + Czechia - 60% England - 50-60% depending area General Balkans - 40-55% East and North France/Belgium - 50-55% Ukraine, Belarus, Russia - 50-60% Italy - 35-40%, sometimes lower in the south Greece - 30-35% Celtic areas - 25-35% Ireland often smaller Iberian peninsula (excluding Basques) 30-45% depending area Rest of France - 30-50% Ossetia - 30-45% Afghanistan/Tajikistan - 30-45% Iran - 30--45% depending area Armenia - 30-35 Kurdistan - 15-20% Pakistan - 24-35%, sometimes higher or lower North India - 20-30% Brahmin often higher Take note that there are other areas with significant ancestry, but they often aren't of our groups.

[@rohankudva2279]

I am a part of this group too and I love it

[@RamZar50]

Western Eurasian Steppes people were the Yamnaya people of 3000 BCE. Descendants of these were the chariot people of Sintashta around 2000 BCE which is at the southern tip of Ural Mountains near the Russian & Kazakh borders. Later the descendants of Sintashta called Andronovo occupied a broader area east of Caspian Sea and south of Sintashta. These were the Aryans who went south to Iran and India around 1000 BCE.

[@Quacklebush]

There is argument that the Corded Ware Culture were not descendants of the Yamnaya but a seperate related tribe, thus making the Proto-Indo-Europeans the Sredny Stog culture. Either way how could you leave out the Corded Ware? The Sintashta are direct descendants of Corded Ware not the Yamnaya.

[@RamZar50]

@@Quacklebush Yamnaya moved into Europe proper and mixed in with the Corded Ware. Then, that mixture came back east to the Fatyanovo-Balanovo culture and eventually to Sintashta. Sintashta with their expertise in domesticated horses, spoked-wheel chariots, archery and metallurgy drove them into contact with the great civilizations.

[@Quacklebush]

Yes I am quite aware of that but like I said the latest theory is that the Corded Ware was separate but yet also still related. Either way my point was how could you not mention the Corded Ware Culture? Corded Ware is by far the most important of the "WES", above Yamnaya and Sintashta.

[@RamZar50]

@@Quacklebush I’m interested in reading more about Ancient DNA & Migrations after leaving Africa. I recently got these 3 books. Any others? * Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past by David Reich * Neanderthal Man: In Search of Lost Genomes by Svante Pääbo * The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World by David W. Anthony * Telling Humanity’s Story through DNA: Geneticist David Reich rewrites the ancient human past. | Harvard Magazine July-August 2022

[@Quacklebush]

@@RamZar50 kzbin.info/www/bejne/m5TQloSKbLdqqM0

[@ARYANLUR]

When you watch clothes and etc it's like a single ethnicity in sight of a neutral person

[@thegodofthegods1084]

No clue what that means man, can you elaborate.

[@lusciousphilosoph6392]

@@thegodofthegods1084 they all looks the same for him

[@mehrshadvr4]

@@thegodofthegods1084 She probably meant clothes look similar in design.

[@christophehatch-berthier6365]

I noticed the Basque people of the Pyrenees are not on the list. Does this have to do with euskara, a spoken language isolate unique to the basque ethnic group?

[@cesarbravo6697]

Language, culture and genes are very different things. Black americans speak a germanic language (English). Does it mean that they have Germanic blood and that the have lost all there african genes? Relating a term (indoeuropean) that was concived to describe languages, with genes and race is not clear to me.

[@animewixx4341]

The Basques have similar genetics to the rest of the Iberian Peninsula with some differences, on the paternal side they are Indo-European but on the maternal side it seems to be from populations prior to the Indo-European expansion during the Neolithic and Mesolithic, 70 % of the male population have haplogroup R1b -DF27 probably from an Indo-European man who lived in the South of France 4500 years ago. The language was able to survive possibly because the women taught their children as their first language, which explains why they do not speak an Indo-European language, because in the rest of the continent it was the men who imposed their language.

[@cesarbravo6697]

@@animewixx4341 Indoeuropean is a linguistic term not a racial one. If two gaelic speaking parents speak to their children in English (lets say in Canada or in the West of Scotland) because English is the language of power there those childen are going to speak in English regardless of the language of their ancesters. And if this is general there is gonig to be a linguistic swicht in the area. Language has nothing to do with genes. Genes don't speak.

[@animewixx4341]

@@cesarbravo6697 That is already refuted, the nicknames the Yamnaya Indo-Europeans are a group of humans resulting from the mixture of the steppe or hunter-gatherers of Eastern Europe with hunter-gatherers of the Caucasus, these humans are associated with the expansion of Indo-European languages ​​and the expansion of the Haplotypes "R", these early Indo-European Yamnya spread throughout Europe, South Asia and the Tocharians in China, this demonstrates the linguistic and genetic similarities shared between these humans so far apart geographically from each other

[@robertolang9684]

@@animewixx4341 I don't carry haplo rb1 , and i have lots of EHG CHG, I'M indo european because my haplo arrived in Europe in bronze age , it was no existent before that time in Europe so and as i carry lots of EHG and CHG more than WHG , i'm not native to Europe as nobody living is , all haplogroups are so old that when it originated it 's origins probably can be traced to Iran Caucasian others Afrikaner others India , etc etc if we talk about sub-clads yes we can trace the time and have a guess where it originated

[@vikramadityahindu8591]

Finnish are not Indo European.Iranians have highest percentage of pure gene followed by North Indian.Only skin tone doesn't make you Indo-European.

[@diamondsarenotforever8542]

The language is not. Have you ever seen a Finn? Researches tell Finland has got percentually most blondies in the world. Watch the video "Which country has the most blondies?" The answer is Finland.

[@vikramadityahindu8591]

@@diamondsarenotforever8542 blondness is adaptation to the cold environment.That blone hair,blue eye concept of Max Muller is not authenticated.

[@jukkahelisjoki5820]

Whatever, we are still whiter than you that's very simple while you arrived to Finland. I have never seen Indian with blonde hair and blue eyes.

[@jukkahelisjoki5820]

@@vikramadityahindu8591 so eskimos should blondest

[@Tea-oz4iy]

​@@jukkahelisjoki5820 YAMANAYAS WERE NOT FULLY BLONDE. FIRST THEY MOSTLY WERE DARK HAIRED . BUT FINISH AND EUROPEANS IN GENERAL MIGHT HAVE GOT IT FROM NATIVE EUROPEAN HUNTER GATHERERS OR MUTATION IN GENES. AGAIN. ALSO THEIR PERCENTAGE OF STEPPE IS LOW. I FEEL GERMANS MADE A MESS OF STEPPE AND MAKE INTO EUROPEAN WHEN IT'S PART OF EUROPEAN ANCESTORY BUT NOT FULLY EUROPEAN. SOME BRAHMINS HAVE BLONDE HAIR AND THE WAY THEY ARE ENDO-GAMOUS IT COULD MEAN THAT YAMNAYAS MAY HAVE IT BUT NOT IN LARGE QUANTITY U DEFINITELY GOT IT FROM UR NATIVE ANCESTORS

[@hmike5154]

Ireland on top

[@andriesscheper2022]

Looks like we're one big family and shouldn't fight eachother. Even Russians and Ukranians share almost 50% of their DNA. Yoint effords would result in much more prosperity for everyone than the destruction that only one disgusting war criminal started.

[@start3215]

Biden?

[@Akbars77]

R1b ,N1,J DNA haplotype are not Aryas.R1a only.

[@eltecnico9541]

The Haplotype N1a1 or also known as N1c originated in the East Asian peoples, spread to Europe, the genes are inherited from ancient North Eurasian populations that the ancestors of the Indo-Europeans inherited

[@eltecnico9541]

Haplotype J and I are somewhat related, J is from the Middle East and I from the ancient populations of Europe, I and J descend from the IJ that existed in the Middle East more than 50,000 years ago

[@k1r4z.]

Two different thüngs those are haplogroups this is more about automosal dna

[@Felipe2009cvb]

Many yamnaya (first aryans) literally carried R1B. What are you smoking?

[@lazyguy3266]

​@@Felipe2009cvb r1a was the dominant genes of aryans not r1b.

[@freepagan]

Manu was a Hindu from INdia. Focus.

[@abhisheksumanAS]

And do let us know how you came to piece together the mapping of genetics to ethnicity and linguistics?! What is your standard for "Aryan" heritage for comparison with each sub-groups, especially when the whole steppe theory has been proved incorrect or atleast incomplete and the Aryan Invasion/Migration theory into India has been long debunked!

[@markusmath3421]

aryan invasion theory makes sense bro my mom with family from punjab and kashmir looks hella ambiguous, she's been confused for different ethnicities. The further north you go in pakistan and into afghanistan as well, the more drastically different people look from the rest of the people in the "indian/south asian subcontinent". That's the most plausible reason. You can't just say its the weather difference.

[@shreyaskumarrath721]

@@markusmath3421 truth. We brahmins look very different from other communities. No matter the place we're from

[@gajendrasinghbhati4490]

@@shreyaskumarrath721 you baman doesn't look different frm dalits🤣🤣🤣

[@shreyaskumarrath721]

@@gajendrasinghbhati4490 lol no. You're a lot darker. Few Brahmins look like that usually those who intermixed at some point.

[@biswaranjanmallick7407]

@@shreyaskumarrath721 You brahmins look darker than adivasis.

[@neutralboi1984]

Why the indo in it?

[@girishg414]

Pretty sure the figures for Balkan countries are dubious- Bulgaria & Albania are Turkified populations, same goes for north Macedonia.

[@lucianpopescu3896]

Results look believable (showing direct correlation with distribution of so-called "Nordic" phenotype) EXCEPT for Indians and Nurestanis/Kalash where they are absurdly high. Later areas were densely inhabited by superior cultures before Aryans came, so latter influence was merely cultural/linguistic but CLEARLY not genetic as phenotypes evidently show

[@user-yt3xd2jl6d]

In reality, the phenotype does not correspond to the genetic load but rather to the number of dominant genes, the WSH genes are very receptive, so they are easily diluted and disappear, a large part of the European Phenotype corresponds to the CGH Caucasus Gatherer Hunters, the average White European phenotype is a mixture of the WSH and HCG Phenotype, we know from genetic studies that people from North India and Pakistan have a high genetic load of WSH similar to Southern Europeans however the type of mixture is different, because in Europe the mixture is WSH (Western Steppe Herder) with GCH, in South Asia the mixture is WSH with hunter gatherers from South Asia

[@user-yt3xd2jl6d]

Another way to see it is by Haplotypes that tell us which human lineages they belong to, Europeans have Haplotypes R1a, R1b, I and J2, people from India have Haplotypes H, J2, L, R1a and R2, people from India they share two lineages with Europeans and a third lineage that is closely related to Europeans which is R2

[@eshaansarkar2017]

Indians are not a race. This video only mentions North Indians. Indians are multi racial. There are Caucasians, East Asians, Australoids and even a very tiny amount of African people who number only a few thousands

[@lucianpopescu3896]

@@user-yt3xd2jl6d I don't think so... The minority of Indians that do not show hunter gatherer influence in phenotype (Veddoid) are almost indistinguishable from Iranians. Dravidians show the same pattern although Veddoid admixture is almost always present there. The only Indian ethnic groups where Aryan phenotype is even possible are "Dards" (eg: Kalash). Modern South Asians are largely a mixture of Iranian settlers that came during neolithic and mesolithic inhabitants (called "Veddoid" by anthropologists) present there for tens of thousands of years (Veddas or Irulas are best representatives today, but most are obviously mixed too). Demographically it is impossible for Aryans to have left much of an influence in Indus valley, which hosted a great urban civilization before. Personally I also find it exaggerated among Northern Europeans also. In terms of phenotype, only a minority carry influences from invaders' phenotypes: 80%+ of Europeans look like mixtures between Neolithic settlers and mesolithic natives (among Indians even more).

[@user-yt3xd2jl6d]

@@lucianpopescu3896 Racial classifications by phenotype are broadly very useful but they do not tell us everything, genetics is a much more precise classification and gives us a much more complex and mixed reality between the different human groups, the genotype is not the same as the phenotype In general, dominant genes manifest in the phenotype and recessive genes do not manifest, for recessive genes to manifest they must have several copies or not possess the dominant gene. Humans with the most recessive genes are those that have undergone inbreeding, humans with the most recessive genes are East Asians, followed by Europeans and the Middle East, and humans with the most dominant genes are Sub-Saharan Africans

[@PindusWrath]

As a North Greek I can confirm we do get 30% or even higher IE admixture, the rest is mostly Neolithic and around 10% WHG

[@thegodofthegods1084]

Greeks are north africans anyways.

[@supermavro6072]

As a Northern Greek, I can confirm you that we Greeks aren't heIIenes at all, We are mostly Turkish mixed with SIavic and AIbanians.

[@hellraiser2631]

@@supermavro6072 Speak for yourself "Northern Greek", your grandfather probably came to our land 100 years ago from mount Ararat.

[@Chris-qn8bm]

@@supermavro6072 albanians, turks and slavs have quite different faces compared to greeks. Maybe are you the one thats quite mixed? The vast majority of greek population looks distinct compared to the others you mentioned.

[@famitsus987]

@@supermavro6072 u mean as Turk u are just Muslim Greeks

[@celik2978]

1:46 Nomad Turcomans

[@twocountriesonenation]

So original Indo-Europeans are albinos right?

[@eltecnico9541]

No or not exactly, there are 4 genes related to light skin, one of those genes is related to abinism, the OCA 1 type 1B "partial albinism" gene, then they have a gene related to blonde hair that is completely independent of albinism called "KITLG" both the OCA 1 gene and the KITG gene are recessive so their traits do not appear in people who have genes for dark or partially dark skin, this explains why southern Europeans do not look blonde or why Indo-Iranians from the Middle East, do not possess these traits despite sharing these genes with Indo-Europeans

[@eltecnico9541]

The KITG gene for blond hair was detected in ancient non-Indo-European Siberian populations, Antofagasta Gora 3 being the first woman to possess it, 16,000 years ago. These ancient Siberian populations mixed with Caucasian hunter-gatherers to give rise to the Indo-Europeans

[@TheMariepi3]

yes , they was albinoes

[@eltecnico9541]

@yitzhak shekkelsteingoldmanberg The term "White" that from a scientific point of view does not make sense since we would be talking about three or 4 different human groups among themselves

[@eltecnico9541]

@yitzhak shekkelsteingoldmanberg Clarified that the light-skinned West Eurasians who are both from Europe and the Middle East have 4 genes related to light skin, there are two different genes OCA 1 type 1B generates partial Albinism and they are found in the populations of Northern Europe and Siberia , then there is the KITLG gene related to blonde hair, this gene is not albinism, it is much more widespread in Europe, Western Asia, the Americas and Oceania (Australia and Oceania), the KITLG gene arose in Asia Siberia and was detected in a woman 16000 years ago

[@yousafdaudzai3078]

Afghans (Pashtuns)????

[@thegodofthegods1084]

They are of African Decent.

[@yousafdaudzai3078]

@@thegodofthegods1084 Okay you Tazik

[@thegodofthegods1084]

@@yousafdaudzai3078 Pashtuns are a Chinese African mix;

[@thegodofthegods1084]

@@yousafdaudzai3078 Also Tajiks are pure in comparison to Pashtuns and the Pashtuns should be sub-servient to the Tajiks (Be Submissive to them) and every Pashtun should kiss each Tajik on the feet.

[@yousafdaudzai3078]

@@thegodofthegods1084 Hhhh I have just listened to the most Funniest Joke in my whole life Hahahaah Super Duper Tazik Mind