Inside The $10 Million Beechcraft King Air 360ER

[@michaelbooher339]

Worked on King Air’s for many years. Excellent aircraft.

[@randyreynolds1045]

The best all around plane out there. Fast too.❤

[@danielepelaia7875]

Range is close to 2700 nm. Cieling 35,000 ft. The cost is like that of a light jet.

[@TigerDominic-uh1dv]

Beautiful Plane 😊

[@LSC2001]

If I win the lottery I’m buying one for a family travel plane. The dream.

[@timmotel5804]

Love It.

[@RGWv]

The Wedding Supper of the Lamb is back here on Earth. Your second guest is quite confused.

[@tonylam9548]

No wonder Textron lost interest in small planes, look at the profits from turbines. Tell me , does it really cost twice as much to make a King Air 360 than a 200??

[@jimczerwinski4951]

Rip out the Collins RUBISH and you might get a good aeroplane. Just saw a 250 upgraded to Garmin, not only was it better,it was a 108 kg lighter. The writings on the wall for Collins.

[@dressydress9726]

Is 35,000 feet height enough to be flying above weather movements?

[@midwestlegacy1919]

Not always. Some wether system cloud tops can reach as high as 60,000 feet, but 35,000 is good enough to remain above most storms

[@dressydress9726]

Air pockets turbulence are still common at 34-35 K feet above SL

[@Georgi_Slavov]

@@midwestlegacy1919up to 60k ft?This would exclude ANY passenger plane currently in use.

[@biopsiesbeanieboos55]

99% of Thunderstorms will rise until they reach the tropopause. (1% will be energetic enough punch through the Tropopause). At the tropopause they will spread horizontally to form the anvil. But the altitude of the Tropopause varies with Latitude. At the higher latitudes (closer to the North and South Pole) you will be above almost everything other than the 1% of the most energetic thunderstorms that have punched through the tropopause. At lower latitudes (closer to the equator), at 35000ft, you’ll be in and out of cirrus, and have to request regular heading changes to manoeuvre around the tops of almost every storm because at lower latitudes every storm will reach an altitude above 35000ft, because the tropopause may get as high as 50, 000 feet. Hope that makes sense. CAT (clear air turbulence) is really the only other reason you’d need more altitude, so if the aircraft is limited to FL350 (35000ft) you can only really descend out of CAT. You don’t really want to be tackling any turbulence at your maximum altitude except for short periods. The aircraft is likely going to be to close to coffin corner to comfortably handle anything other than very light turbulence. Generally, flying at an aircraft’s maximum altitude, one should always be aware of the fact.

[@michaeladams2959]

Not in the pacific ocean area where thunder storms can top 60,000 feet

[@bobrichardson5905]

I always wondered what happens when you have to take a dump in a plane like this LOL...does the whole cabin suffer, or is there a vent fan??? May there be mercy for the one who poops in the airplane LOLOL

[@tonylam9548]

There are such thing in a pressurized cabin as out flow valve, they are located in the rear of the cabin, constantly letting air out to maintain set cabin pressure. This effectively act as a washroom exhaust fan.

[@bobrichardson5905]

I read that old learjet story where a guy took a big one with only a curtain separator between him and the cabin. Not a good ending for any of them@@tonylam9548

[@MARINECORPS61992113]

If i had 50 mil im gifting someone a 350er and paying for fuel for a yr for mil and then buying me two 350ers

[@KofoshiiKaro]

Would love to be that person😅

[@robertspakowski6401]

It has USB outlets ! But does it have free WiFi ?😊

[@rolltide9547]

No 19.95 per day

[@waynesilva3129]

What I’m not to keen about with the king air is the instrument panel. Put it along side the new Honda jet. Or any small Jet. It’s not clean, well laid out. Just very cluttered looking.

[@Mostopinionatedmanofalltime]

Beechcraft is good for carrying a lot of coke.😅

[@jimczerwinski4951]

Actually your on the mark there, just looked through a new one. Rough as guts. They even forgot to gas the air con’. The Barons are just as badly put together. I’d be happier with an old 300 upgraded with Garmin.

[@tedbates1316]

Aside from the glass, that cockpit looks prehistoric. Such a lack of innovation.

[@kevinbarry71]

Only a certified masochist would ride in that airplane for 2500 nautical miles

[@jec1ny]

Agreed. I have nothing against prop planes. They have their uses and can be a convenient and cost effective option for short to intermediate distance flights. But anything over four hours would start to get uncomfortable. A 2500-mile flight would probably run at least 8 hrs. If you're traveling that kind of distance, you either charter a jet, or fly commercial.

[@Georgi_Slavov]

@@jec1ny what if they make a jet version with,say,350-400kts cr.speed?This will shorten the flight time by 25% at least.

[@jec1ny]

@@Georgi_Slavov I'm not sure what your point is. I've already said that for longer flights you either charter a jet or fly commercial. Short flights by jets are already possible. The main arguments for prop planes are cost and the ability to get into some airfields where a jet can't land.

[@Georgi_Slavov]

@@jec1ny sure,but would the airframe handle 400 kts?i am just a fan of the King Air,and wonder if it can be upgraded for a faster flight.

[@maple-leafs13]

​@@Georgi_Slavovnot sure if theyre designed to handle those speed. But turboprop definetly wont rach 400knts. Youre delaing with jet speed at that point for a plane of this size. There are fast turboprop planes but i think theyre designed for 2 seater or max 4 seater

[@Clovescp]

Este Avião 🛬 tem um Grande defeito e estás Janelas como são feias Estes formato oval remete àquelas roupas de *Mergulhos Escafandro*

[@Clovescp]

O que e Pior fizeram o avião 🛬 Beechcraft Denali com o formato das Janelas Redondas e uma Piada só em olhar estas janelitas dar Fobia de Serem Redondas remete aos trajes *Merculho Escafandro*

[@Mark-pp7jy]

Anything more than 20 to 30 minutes with 13 people and one on the can?...NO THANK YOU!

[@tovisenchantedworld182]

H

[@tovisenchantedworld182]

Ha ha ha😂

[@johnbennett4521]

Pile of total shit, much like Harley Davidson, no real changes just new paint and some winglets. Take that 10 M and put it to a real aircraft

[@waynesilva3129]

When you look at the plane, it’s 1960s technology. How often will all the seats be taken? An SUV with the pilot and one or two passengers.

[@DD-lh4sv]

Man, I'm trying a lot of bikes, but no one of them feels more "bikeble" in competition with 2001 Dyna. If you prefer some kind of "new high-tech" motorbike, you are either child or just don't ride anything better than a cb600

[@tovisenchantedworld182]

H