Avoid Massively Unprofitable Poker Plays (Pro Tips)

[@riley_bohr]

When the caller starts mentioning blockers so early on in the hand I know we're gonna be in for some fish decisions on later streets

[@philip-op6de]

My exact thoughts 😂 People always use things like “Blockers” to justify bad game play 💀

[@dylanleaks1542]

Never used “blocker” theory to make a decision. Villain can have any card that’s not in your hand or the board. Simple as that

[@johnf1772]

@@dylanleaks1542 Then you have a leak. Villain still has a range...he doesn't have ANY two of the 45 remaining cards...he doesn't get to the river with any one of 990 combinations of cards. If that were true you'd have to call with literally any hand you ever get to the river with....unless you are also playing any two. Regardless, you've acknowledged that villain can't have a card if it's in your hand. Because the cards in your hand do something for those possibilities...what's the word I'm looking for...oh yes..."block". Blockers are certainly not the end of the conversation, but ignore them at your peril.

[@riley_bohr]

@@johnf1772 🐟🐠

[@kevinmclain6741]

Well it completely changes the combinatorics...

[@gabrielrockman]

It doesn't matter whether or not the hero thinks he could have 9-7 suited here. What matters is whether or not the villain thinks that the hero could have 9-7 suited here. Even if the hero might have 9-7 suited here, if the villain doesn't believe this, then trying to represent 9-7 suited is not going to work.

[@justinhart7172]

I guess he didn’t believe he could

[@Love1isall]

🤭 easy he might outthink himself

[@burkhartlaw1]

I’m at the 9:00 mark. I laughed because I ran a similar bluff on almost this exact board at a tournament the other day. I ran it right into quad sixes.

[@brickcitybeatdown]

You the real MVP

[@vitkomusic6624]

Exactly. Its weather you shoot. A check bet and if he calls that tells you something.

[@davidelet3652]

Got to love it when the fish calls in. Dunning-kruger is real. "I have been a sub for years. I called in before and it was good. I know what i am doing" LoL 😂

[@mikeduke1294]

He won the hand though. It's the luck of life to be wrong and win, if you learn. But yeah, one thing I notice in these videos is that ONE person is a highly-accomplished, extremely experienced and awarded professsional, and the other is some guy (usually a guy). And the "some guy" always acts like he's a peer of the professional. Or even superior in his craft. I can promise you two things: 1. I am vastly better and more knowlegable than Bart Hanson about the auto finance industry. 2. Bart is vastly better and more knowledgable than I am about poker.

[@pot_kivach160]

a fish is excited when see a fish.

[@MajorCanada]

Listening this player cope about their poor choices is brutal. You did what you could for him.

[@stugotswins]

Except tell him blackjack would be a better choice

[@iamamish]

poker is a complex game and it requires us to take a bunch of pieces of disparate data and synthesize that into a coherent picture of what's happening. It sounds to me like the caller over-emphasized the straight blocking properties of his hand, and he also thought too much of the value of his bets without thinking about how the board evolved and interacted with the range of hands he was representing. Poker is a hard game.

[@gxfr795]

Quit yapping

[@iamamish]

@@gxfr795 my bad let me know if you need anything else

[@Love1isall]

​@@gxfr795😂

[@CN4891-c1z]

Nah, the caller is an insecure loser simply calling in to brag about his "great call". He came up with all of the narratives for "why" after the fact. (Most of which were also way off-base)

[@r1ckh0ward]

⁠@@CN4891-c1zabsolutely. This guy called in expecting to be told what a brilliant play he made. However, instead he showed himself to be a massive fish. I doubt he took onboard anything that Bart said to him and still doesn’t realise he played literally every street wrong.

[@spaffron4285]

What a great turn for over pairs

[@mikekrebs5598]

If I ever saw a player table 7s in this spot I would definitely reload for the maximum possible amount.

[@justinhart7172]

What if you didn’t see cuz villain mucks just like the caller verbalized

[@mikekrebs5598]

@justinhart7172 I am talking about the player that called in the hand, i.e. the one with the 7s...

[@gnorty]

@@mikekrebs5598 the villain mucked, so he didn't see the caller's 77 (unless caller just showed for no reason)

[@davidelet3652]

​@@gnortyYou didn't get the point. He meant that the caller is a major fish.

[@schroederluck7984]

@@davidelet3652I wonder if gnorty could explain to us how he’d feel tonight if he didn’t eat dinner

[@CN4891-c1z]

@5:55 Completely contradictory response. "I definitely have 97 suited, it was player dependent".... So you're relying on the fish to properly range you based on the way that you continue pre-flop against a fish?

[@CN4891-c1z]

Never mind, not sure why I commented something with this much nuance, he continues to say absurd/dumb shit the next two minutes....

[@supersmoo7377]

On the flop Bart says to check-fold 7d7h on a board of Td8d6s. I think that’s too tight of a play. I think we can call and evaluate what happens. I also don’t mind the Hero check-raising, as he did here.

[@gabepowell1191]

He said multiway out of position though. I think the logic here is that unless you hit a 9 on the turn 3 ways, you’re folding if any more money goes in anyway so you should just fold now when you only have maybe 4 clean outs, and that’s excluding losing to QJ if the 9 comes

[@gregroland1519]

Best break down I've seen in awhile. Thanks to Bart and the Midwest crusher.

[@JohnSmith-nx7zj]

10:57 lol that the guy thinks anyone is folding Tx vs his sizing on the board pairing turn let alone JJ/QQ.

[@Ekid33]

Yeah I don't like the sizing at all. He's polarized his range and the nuts haven't changed, he should be giving up or blasting off. I would have gone pot-pot (or pot on the turn and give up on the river).

[@DrColePuterbaugh]

this is so much better than the old 2+2 forums - how did I just discover this?

[@NorCal_Poker]

Great call on the river! If I made this call at 1/3, villain will almost always have a full house 😅

[@mkader2494]

Me too, i'd have called and lost lol :(

[@mrhumble2937]

If all bad players. Usually a good player or 2 who bluffs

[@johnryal]

Difference in stakes 1/2 players don’t find a bluff

[@Ekid33]

It is a bit of an odd bet, considering that the Hero isn't really representing many marginal hands, most of his range consists of slow-played Full houses and missed draws. An over-pair doesn't really want to bet into that range, it would rather just check back and get the free showdown. From my experience in live games, I've seen players get spewy when they see their opponents slowly lowering their aggression and eventually checking. It's not really a balanced play, they just sense weakness and blast off with whatever junk they're holding. If the guy in question has knowledge of his opponent, or has seen them do something like this before, then I love the call. Otherwise, it's a close spot.

[@RunItTw1ce4858]

If you flop a set of Ts, 8s, or 6s, you want to use large sizes to stack over pairs. Not be cute with half pot sizes.

[@DallasDelRio]

I think overpairs aren’t going to go for thin value here. This is a super polarized bet, so I wouldn’t bluff raise with this runout. It’s either air or a boat. Check call on the river. Not sure about the double barrel on the turn but as played great call on the river.

[@bomblade15]

Overpairs should be here. Why not? What are you scared your opponent has?

[@ThePatriots010304]

Most overpairs are going to value bet the river after it's checked. It was only 550 into 905 which is about the right size an overpair would bet hoping a 10 or 10,8 would call. Check raising the flop, betting half pot on the turn and then checking the river isn't exactly a line a 6 or full house would take. If I'm villain I'm putting him on K10, Q10 maybe 10,8 so I would bet 550 on the river hoping for a call.

[@rcadegaming9123]

You're missing value when checked to on river if you arent betting overpairs here.

[@Young-ep8ik]

The typical guy that sounds confident, speaks fluently but has zero idea of what he's doing. Gets pointed out the hole in his logic and just goes 'anyways, here's what I think instead' without addressing the criticism whatsoever.

[@tphuynh85]

He's forcing it. Action doesn't make sense

[@lukewheat7693]

He also doesn't really speak fluently... You can tell he's just word vomiting stuff he's previously heard and misapplying it terribly.

[@32roho]

“Reverse reverse”I hope the villain is Tom Dwan or some really talented highly skilled player. 12:26.

[@jackcooke2327]

not just that - they need to both be studied in the game AND think the same about you, the reverse-reverse idea just doesn't work. Your opponent is never going to think "this is bad card to barrel on and he's barreling so he must be strong," he's just going to think "this donkey is blasting off in a spot that doesn't make any sense, I am favored here"

[@leviwhatever6192]

12:00 "I know what I'm doing!"

[@schroederluck7984]

Hilarious, because if taken to its logical conclusion, it means that hero called in to flex his win due to his genius and creative play

[@TheTruth923]

If I have an overpair I’m likely bet folding that river for value. Caller pretty much played his hand face up. Check raised with the intention of making overcards fold with his one pair. Showed some weakness on that river. Players seem to do this a lot. I would’ve put the caller on a 10 at best.

[@kenengel620]

Hailing from another generic city in the Midwest, I've been trying to find an online game but all of the reputable sites I've tried say they're not available in the US. Any suggestions?

[@fireinfireout]

I love when people are secretive about their game. Yeah buddy, I'm sure your underground game is going to get raided by you giving your city information.

[@godwin0605]

😂😂😂

[@BryanSmith-bn3wq]

Lot of bored, overfunded police departments in the country. I got a speeding ticket for doing 52 MPH on a 50 MPH 3 lane highway driving through the midwest. Best to keep poker games secret.

[@brickcitybeatdown]

​@@BryanSmith-bn3wqcool story bro

[@Nek0jin]

Check-raising more than once during the same hand is sending mixed signals. The first check-raise is saying, "Aha! I've got a more powerful hand than you think!" But doing it a second or third time doesn't have the same feel. You've already claimed hidden strength, so doing it again feels like you're playing games with the opponent(s), and not taking it seriously. Which, for a lot of people, makes it feel like you're bluffing, not actually serious.

[@victord6940]

First Bart says T8 and 97 shouldn't be in caller's range, and that's alright. But then he says villain could bet SPECIFICALLY targetting T8 with an overpair? That's because hero's range is capped by the check? I'm not quite on board with caller's actions up to the turn, but check-calling here, although he has a 7 of diamonds (which blocks basically Ad7d - 6d7d got there would and 8d7d would beat say black 77) seems pretty reasonable. Busted draws are most of the hero's bluffing range on the river. Would would I value bet against that with overpair in villain's shoes? Would AT, KT, QT, JT, T9 take frequently hero's apporach? Not frequently. Thinking "full house or probably nothing" holds some logic.

[@Jimmyisabot]

yep my first thought was all the black J9s let alone Ax and 9x of diamond combos (Q9, K9) - wish we heard more about villain's vpip, I think it changes the context of the hand

[@ctriis]

I don't get it. Every action he takes is non-standard. Making up non-standard ranges and reasons for villain to play in a non-standard way does not justify making bad decisions regardless of the outcome of this one hand. Playing like this on the regular cannot possibly be very profitable, even at these stakes?

[@timmyp34]

Right. We should not be outcome dependent here.

[@Jimmyisabot]

not trying to patronize but the cards don't give a fuck if you play standard or not - it's easy to berate this guy by labeling his plays as anti-meta but as we all know every game plays massively differently, there's a ton of information even the hero doesn't realize he knew about the villain which is not brought up on the call - hero called for the validation he probably needed and left with good information and hopefully will become a better player

[@Conductor2711]

Mostly agree with Bart on every street, but the hero isn't blocking combo draws on the river. What busted flushes is he blocking? 67dd, 97dd, 57dd are all made hands. 87dd is not a thing b/c of the board. So that leaves A7dd? Maybe villian gets in there with K7dd?? But I do think the 7d is way better for calling here than, say, the Jd would be

[@codyzimmerman2582]

Can I get the caller in my home game please? Link to his socials

[@hansari8697]

Caller mentions blockers like 79 should ever even be in his range flatting the SB. Much more relevant to block pair imo. Also I don’t believe unpaired over cards do a lot of betting on this board multi-way w the exception of hands like QJ and Q9 that peel IP vs XR usually.

[@Young-ep8ik]

Why would an overpair only bet when it is to target T8? Why can't QQ bet the river to target AT/KT? I think there is enough think value to be had here that any overpair warrants a river bet.

[@Hellos789]

I too would have called the river bet. Not only getting 3-1 but ...1) oppon having a overpair is unlikely 2) Only one overcard..is on the board. So i get to see the results of my "delayed" race for a relatively small river call.

[@Hellos789]

Put another way.... yes i didnt flop a sêt. But I like boards with only one over card.

[@xothm4nx]

I want this guy in my game!

[@mh_golfer]

I would definitely bet an over pair on that board if it was checked to me on the river. No one is checking a straight or trips after check raising and betting the turn with those hands looking to check raise.

[@Unhingedanduninformed]

I don’t know, man, a check raise on that flop to me screams something more akin to a combo draw or a nut flush draw, not a nut hand like a set, two pair or straight. So I think the idea of exhibiting strength based on a flop check raise may be a little bit hopeful.

[@Mauricio-kf8qx]

Why wouldn’t someone raise a set on that board ??

[@timmyp34]

Peoria, IL, is the classic generic town/city. "Will it play in Peoria?"

[@paulpena5040]

I would have called too but it's not because he wouldn't bet with an overpair. I wouldn't make that assumption. I would assume some x % of the time he's making that large bet with an overpair but it's not 100% of the time and given how passive he's been in the hand and the fact that your river check opens you up to a bluff you have to assume that you're good at least 25 % of the time. This wouldn't be a fist pump call but it would be a "meh, probably slight +ev"

[@markminks546]

When the turn gives every overpair two pair you better slow down unless you have the goods.

[@Eastcoastwes92]

Also, the villain said they could have T8s which overpairs now beat. Rough to listen to, Barts a saint

[@Fixundfertig1]

Having a pair but play it like a set, that's the good old Tony G style

[@rcadegaming9123]

Tony G is a great player unlike this brainless worm

[@jaketaylor3129]

Why dont you want to play suited connectors multi way? I understand that every single hand plays better heads up. Obviously kq and aj are good multiway hands and I understand why. Why not the same thing for suited connectors? Better chances of being outflushed? I guess it depends on table too. Some dont pay attention to multiway and dont tighten their post flop range. I just think those speculative hands are better multiway in the event you make a real hand. Like J10 suited for example, tends to play better headsup? I dont understand why.

[@stefancopicuk]

What Bart said was that suited 1 or 2 gappers OOP are long term an unprofitable hand to play. You will miss far too often. Plus, even when you make that rare hit, you have to hope that you get paid the max to make back at least some of those losses. Better to let them go from the SB. Direct suited connectors IP are a completely different animal.

[@willinnewhaven3285]

Generic City is just west of Point Plate, Wi.

[@spaffron4285]

Thank you Bart 👊

[@MichaelJohnson-ql6ob]

What is a sub?

[@thebarrybarry]

I mean when he starts saying I do t think the size of the stacks effect the hand …… then he starts talking about blockers …… the problem is the guy does not know his own range from the get go …. He has no idea what he’s flatting here so it’s gonna be very hard to navigate when he has no idea where in his range he is . He thinks he knows x/raise looks strong but he does not know what value he has that x/raises . Then by his language he says I’ve started down this road , implying he does not know egg he at to do so keep pressing the aggression button . He also somehow thinks top pair and over pairs are gonna start folding when he barrels a complete brick for him and a great card for IP . This is why poker can be so hard/frustrating- you have guys that don’t know what their own range is so it’s quite hard to play against someone that is betting but does not know what he is representing. If people just put 90% of their time into learning their preflop ranges off by heart instead of fancy x/r and betting because they want opponent to fold so bet bet bet etc , then their post flop play would become 100% easier as they would be able to visualise range versus range and then it just comes Down to , bet the top(value) of range , bet the bottom(bluffs) of range and check the middle . No need to complicate it and then use ‘blockers’ to justify button clicking.

[@Stockhandle123]

What kind of game is this that an over pair doesn't bet this river? It's such a standard value betZ

[@justinhart7172]

Is it though when you get c/r on flop and bet into on turn

[@Stockhandle123]

@@justinhart7172 and then checked to on the river? Yeah.

[@nnandrei]

@@justinhart7172 Hero has more bluffs than value here tbh, and that 6 turn is a great card for V. Once Hero x the river, if I'm V here and got an overpair, I see a very easy value bet

[@jaycosta1657]

I can't see why a 7-9 would raise here. Bet out maybe, see where you're at. Otherwise a set maybe, but I'd imagine a set probably wants to lead that board with multi-players and a somewhat connected board. Other than a set, I can't see a situation where I imagine 7-9 being held here. So you're hoping they see you as a wide range player otherwise you'll profit usually just off AK c-bet or you may be in bad shape.

[@seangrover702]

Why would over pairs not bet if hands like 77 are gonna check call?

[@djsobish]

Guy kinda sounds like Garrett. Both in inflection and superiority complex.

[@SqueakyClean87]

Only problem is Garrett is never flatting 7s in the SB 😂

[@jambreakfast4341]

Do you have a poster of Garrett above your bed?

[@SqueakyClean87]

@@jambreakfast4341 of course don’t you?

[@brickcitybeatdown]

​@@jambreakfast4341I do

[@Wolf.of.Gotham]

This here my friends, is an Official Medical Diagnosis of FPS - Fancy Play Syndrome, where you can't resist turning a straightforward poker hand into a classic case of overthinking and out-leveling yourself!

[@supersmoo7377]

Bart is out of touch here when he thinks most people aren’t flatting with 97 suited out of the small blind facing a raise from HJ. I’d say at least 60% of player population does that. Maybe as much as 80% of players.

[@tylerheiser6495]

That’s why 60-80% of players are losing players. He’s trying to make people into winning players

[@coreyfranco7060]

In order to be a winning player you would need to know that 7-9 tends to flat in this position

[@tylerheiser6495]

@@coreyfranco7060 depends on stacks but you’re not getting a good price in SB and you have to play out of position guaranteed. BB could 3bet then ur fucked and also position matters more deep stacked which is the only time you’re gonna get payed when you bink. There’s a lot of reasons not to play this hand here

[@Stumpwater27]

I wonder why it’s called set when set normally means a pair which is two

[@jamespearson00]

I will occasionally call in the SB in tourneys with suited gaps like 79 when there is an over aggro player in the pot. Its a great exploit to disguise the rare occasion when you hold the nuts. Ive hit 2 straight flushes recently with these hands in the SB and BB, and stacked opponents. Its an easy fold when you don't flop a good hand/good draw. Definitely player dependent, but it can work.

[@willh4340]

Could be Detroit, too. Ames, maybe? He's DEFINITELY not from WI or MN

[@jerryjohnson414]

Im calling with my 2 pair. Overpair

[@pokerbosscycler]

💯 💯

[@bradleyhines604]

Why do we assume villain isn't betting the river with an over pair? Heros line looks like 10x to me. If i was the villain, i would bet the river for value with an over pair. Why not?

[@iamamish]

Your opponent raised your flop bet and bet the turn, which is polarizing. Having a 10 is huge bc we block sets except 8s (sixes are blocked on the turn). However, hero's line looks like a set/straight, or air. When hero checks to villain, what are we hoping to get called by? Hero's line is unorthodox, and I would not have expected it. I actually like villain's play, and hero's play ended up working out despite his intentions. I suppose we can make an argument for betting with a ten just because so much of the board is spoken for, but if I had jacks, or queens? I think I probably check this back, though that might be a bit nitty.

[@bradleyhines604]

@@iamamish hero's line looks very strong until he checks the river. I don't think he would do that with a boat or straight, and an over pair would have 3bet pre, so 10x is just about the best hand he can have. I would bet an over pair for value every time because a 10 would almost never fold.

[@iamamish]

@@bradleyhines604 yes the checkback is a bit odd on the river for hero, I agree

[@seslocrit9365]

Terrible continue OTT. Horrendous thought process.

[@pokerbosscycler]

fish talking

[@seslocrit9365]

@@pokerbosscycler you are more than welcome to sit at one of my tables.

[@MichaelFoucault-u4h]

Why would you target T8 on the river when he called from the SB

[@CN4891-c1z]

Didn't you hear him, he can also have 97 suited, and figures the "fish" villain is aware of it. This caller contradicted himself left and right to fish for compliments....

[@joehenry9546]

That check raise is so heavily weighted toward draws. I don’t think he’s folding out much.

[@mkader2494]

Nice call!

[@blakemarshall9386]

This caller is the Keanu Reeves of assassins….completely preposterous in the real world. He’s the essence of a crush live poker over thinker.

[@Chino-bk9fd]

how often is doug polk calling in to troll bart??? 😂😂😂

[@AlienationIsReal]

I want to play w this guy. What a fish. I think he played every street bad. I'm definitely betting an overpr on the river hoping he thinks I have busted diamonds.

[@tphuynh85]

Mistakes exponentially grows and makes it more difficult for the hero.

[@MichaelJohnson-ql6ob]

Is there a phone number to call?

[@sneakkyz3696]

This is what happens when someone watches videos and think they know how to put the things they see in said videos to use but actually have no clue 😂. Dude is lost

[@joshuapatrick682]

You should “always commit” to check raise barrel shove bluffs regardless of runouts and representing hands you can’t have.

[@KraphtOne]

I would bet an overpair to target your obvious one pair hand

[@Racing_Tendencies]

8:18 this guy on the phone is a donkey lmao… almost don’t even want to watch the rest of the video… but I will 😅 Thanks for amazing content as always 18:35 lmfao he lost that hand and just said he folded to not look dumb 😅😅😅😅😂😂😂

[@Racing_Tendencies]

8:18 this guy on the phone is a donkey lmao… almost don’t even want to watch the rest of the video… but I will 😅 Thanks for amazing content as always

[@mikeleone2699]

St Louis. KC. Cinci

[@vitkomusic6624]

River check is worst. If you kept. Firing as underdog. Usually players fold on river after 3rd bullet. On this board if someone is calling. That says something. Wrong tutorial.

[@Kd4c]

Indianapolis and columbus are not the midwest. Saint louis to denver's the midwest.

[@EllieBanks333]

The U.S. Census Bureau's definition consists of 12 states in the north central United States: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.

[@Kd4c]

@EllieBanks333 U s census bureau says a lot of stuff but if you are in the eastern time zone you are not in the midwest.

[@iamamish]

I've lived in Indiana and Ohio my entire life and we most definitely call this area the midwest. There is something to be said for calling it the east instead, but regardless of whatever rules you've landed on, that is what it is called.

[@EllieBanks333]

@@Kd4c How did you determine that?

[@Kd4c]

@EllieBanks333 If you are in the Eastern time zone and East of the Mississippi, you are not in any way shape or form associated with the west.

[@mtbjourney8209]

live poker is still a great game!

[@jerryjohnson414]

Lmao ty bart! " you shouldn't have"

[@Lemono14]

Um Cleveland is not in the Midwest

[@branchtana315]

"When a c/r I look strong. It looks like I hit something"......Yeah, you hit your head on something.

[@justinhart7172]

Bart folds river. Good call

[@Mr.Muckington]

Caller needs to learn poker. Horrible player

[@michaelstephens9852]

Let the bad players be bad lol

[@paul40657]

I want to play with this dude 😂

[@Jacobst54]

The ol’ reverse reverse

[@jaketaylor3129]

Could he really have TT there? I guess but thats strange.

[@pokerbosscycler]

flush draw rip in it.. no fishing around.

[@willh4340]

I HATE the "3 bet or fold," mentality in situations like this, where it's tough to realize your equity! I support the decision to call cheap, and set mine. After the flop, turning 7's into a bluff was foolish. For the first time, I can actually quote Phil Laak. "No set, no bet." Period!

[@PhilipKhuu]

3-betting can help you realize your hand's equity by reducing the number of opponents in the pot, making it more likely that your hand will hold up.

[@willh4340]

@@PhilipKhuu At best, you MIGHT go from 3 in the hand to 2. The hand won't have that much more equity with 1 villain in the pot, as opposed to 2. Especially not pre-flop, and in this case, even less so on the flop, when you have third pair

[@fernandotamblay8072]

After reading this, I can think only one thing: Live poker is still alive in 2024

[@bomblade15]

​@@fernandotamblay8072Explain

[@ThePatriots010304]

@@fernandotamblay8072 It is. If you're a competent player, you should be able to clean up 1/2NL and most 2/5NL games. 2/3NL is the lowest in my area and it's not unheard of to walk out with 2k after a session of 6-8 hours.

[@Daniel-fo9jf]

Sets want to get the money in by the river and bluffs should be maximizing fold equity by threatening stacks. Small flop raise and half pot sized barrel makes no sense unless hero is doing this with AT or weirdly played JJ

[@CN4891-c1z]

The SPR on that they show up with on the turn is what really matters

[@grenademaster8981]

Wow please let this guy play at my table! What a donk!

[@johndambrosio7071]

IDC what computers say,people just get a feel or just know some is full of it,and that's why when you follow someone else's advice isn't always close to the best,all there telling you is how they play and what analytics say,we all all of us play different,this guy said fold and you won because HE WOULD'VE LOST AND "YOU WON"so what he didn't have the k of diamond everyone plays different, enough of this well I block the nuts,why??cause you had the A...I flipped k high flush your ace isn't blocking shit unless 4 diamonds come out,do the math if you only flopped 3 diamonds and needed 1 more for the nuts and I'm holding 2 of them with 4 on the board this is all bs

[@AI2789crg]

The caller gets max value from his low equity hand and tons of folks commenting how bad he is? Um, ok. 😅😅😅

[@BB-eu5gt]

Cleveland, generic? Ever heard of Bone Thugz N Harmony my guy?

[@mdg4347]

Generic hands, require generic play.

[@farris2847]

No way calling 79s in SB is going to be profitable long term.

[@stevenundisclosed6091]

Hero is a fish.

[@darklurker33]

This caller was the idiot we all like on our tables.

[@NOXkaz]

fold pre

[@prepaidtrash5552]

Why the dude talk like that at the start 😂

[@edwardharrell46]

He’s lucky he probably had 2 ♦️ .. or AQ , AK, AJ. 77 was lucky.

[@denniskim1352]

the caller doesn't know what the hell he is doing

[@joshuapatrick682]

Significant Blockers eh? This should be fun

[@jbbruno8115]

Bart’s face tells it all. EVERYTHING about hero’s thinking is wrong. Everything. This is where hero wants to make a stand? Ugh

[@chriskoshinski]

"You keep saying these words"... I don't think you know what they mean...

[@rcadegaming9123]

So smug, so terrible

[@NicholasCrowson]

Can I get in this game, lol.