I wish they would add in technology rolls. Infantry that cost only a dollar is sweet. My favorite is Fighters defending on fives and bombers rolling three dice for damage (Nukes)
@Cobra-21773 ай бұрын
@@kuririn1975 I liked the tech tree as well.
@sranmilosevic14723 ай бұрын
Can you do allies next time?
@Cobra-21773 ай бұрын
@@sranmilosevic1472 working on axis only right now but I will do allies at some point
@sranmilosevic14723 ай бұрын
@@Cobra-2177 thanks on answer😊
@andrewgiallonardo34263 ай бұрын
Did you consider the carrier drop from Karelia to snipe his 5 undefended USA transports on Germany 8?
@Cobra-21773 ай бұрын
@@andrewgiallonardo3426 I'd have to go back and look but I think I needed the 14 IPC the carrier costs to defend Germany against his Baltic stacks
@MarkMoore-k4e2 ай бұрын
I am still confused when it says, for example 3/4 or 1/4 for remaining moves of an airplane. Can you clarify?
@Cobra-21772 ай бұрын
@@MarkMoore-k4e the fraction refers to the number of remaining moves versus the total moves for the plane. So "3/4" means if the plane survives combat, it can move 3 more times (out of the 4 total moves for a plane). This is especially important to keep track of in battles like pearl harbor, which will force you to move an aircraft carrier in range to give surviving fighters a landing spot if they don't have enough moves left to safely land. Hope that helps.
@MarkMoore-k4e2 ай бұрын
@@Cobra-2177 It def does, I did a British reverse Pearl Harbor on round one since I had a plane survive in Egypt. Then I chose to lose the aircraft carrier. Thanks, since I lost 1 more unit and didn't know which plane to take the hit. EDIT: thanks again, plane made it back to India and won the encounter -30 to -54
@thplonk3 ай бұрын
You should know that every time you say that attacking fighters are garbage, some of the audience replies "Buy more bombers, then."
@Cobra-21773 ай бұрын
@@thplonk well I might if they didn't defend at a God awful 1
@thplonk3 ай бұрын
A genuine disadvantage... but a defensive build limits your options, and bombers (within reason) open your options up. Worth looking at how often in a game you rely on your air units for defense, and how often you rely on them for attack. If a fighter spends multiple turns attacking but never really defends or contributes to deterring a viable attack, it should have been a bomber.
@jeffandphoebe3 ай бұрын
In hindsight would you do the IC in Egypt again?
@Cobra-21773 ай бұрын
@@jeffandphoebe maybe. I lost it but it kinda served its purpose, making him spend time in Africa instead of landing in Germany
@JohnClarke-p4r3 ай бұрын
I think it was a big mistake.
@andrewgiallonardo34263 ай бұрын
On Germany round 7 you were counting VC wrong. He was not in position to snipe. Phillipines only would have brought him to 9. France was UK, and if you take it back he goes down to 7, then USA retaking only puts him back at 8 and Phillipines made 9.
@tim5510les3 ай бұрын
yes, this was a long Game
@MrAbruntjen3 ай бұрын
Attacking Fighters really are hot garbage. Seems that they miss at an extremely high rate during the most critical 1st dice roll, then more ‘normal’ variance for the rest of the rolls in any given battle.
@Cobra-21773 ай бұрын
@@MrAbruntjen I'm amazed at how often they miss... it's a 50-50 chance to hit for gosh sake