Ayn Rand destroys socialism forever

[@bobbeckel5266]

When the coal producers used government to gain a monopoly, the market produced oil. When the oil makers used government to gain a monopoly, the market produced natural gas. The market system is the most creative and flexible mechanism the human race has ever created. Capitalism has created the richest world in history.

[@slthbob]

Excuse me? The geographical locations for the voluntary exchange of goods and services was around for thousands of years before the voluntary exchange of goods and services.... wow.... someone needs to re-educate themselves on what capitalism is.... the sweat of my brow is my capital, a source of wealth each of us is born with.... it can be my ability to dig a ditch or it can be my ability to catch fish, it can even be my ability to coordinate the actions of several different technical specialists to produce a product... that I will trade for other goods and services (food, clothing, shelter, an Ipod) through a voluntary negotiation.... go back to school and learn something Tomato Pa.... your ignorance is showing brother, markets arose to empower capitalistic efficiency... your indoctrination is failing you.

[@tablaturebutler2823]

+Bob - Absolute rubbish and nonsense - that you actually believe this bullshit goes a long way toward understanding the intellectual limitations of conservatives...

[@nickkhaz4533]

i love how the internet brings ignorance to my fingertips

[@Jadae]

@@tablaturebutler2823 reeeeeeeeeeeee :]

[@alexdouglas25]

You are correct🏆 and you will see lost of leftists ( lazy) trying to say otherwise

[@NightMoves1969]

"Check your premises " is now my response to anyone who says "check your privileged "

[@barrystack1305]

I was thinking the same thing 8) its a nice quick comeback/got 'em

[@georgegarcia3182]

Agreed. I've done something similar with the BLM stuff but this is more succinct.

[@BigEvan96]

Fat Retarded Conservative Fox Viewer Found the snowflake.

[@tori2dles]

Barry Stack - Except when we’re smart enough to have them already checked and know exactly why we believe as we do and can logically pick apart the poison in her ideology. Someday you look up the guy from whom she stole her theory, a fellow Russian named Chernyshevsky who also wrote a fictional book in the same vein as “Atlas Shrugged” or “The Fountainhead.” He didn’t called it “objectivism,” though. He named it “rational egoism.” Rand is not at all original and the theories she espoused were prized by guys like Lenin. Interestingly, she used them to frame her version of capitalism while Lenin used it to frame his version of communism. It’s so interesting how Conservatives are so in love with Randian philosophy. However, if everyone embraced it, we could say goodbye to things like the military and other selfless jobs (no one would consider the ultimate sacrifice for the good of the country or community, for example). Why should they? They may give a little, but not to the point of real sacrifice. And God forbid we value sacrifice and view it as an ideal. God forbid we have any expectation of humanity or empathy. Rand saw herself as her own god. She was drunk on being a cult leader and the power she had (for awhile) at seducing younger men who were enamored with her intellect. But even Alan Greenspan has to admit that there is a fatal flaw in the belief system. And that flaw is the idea that people will self regulate out of their own self-interest. The reality is that greedy people will make a run on whatever they can get and drive the system into the ground as long as they can prosper. And it doesn’t matter who suffers in the end - “it’s their own fault for not being smarter, stronger or more ruthless. It’s their fault for being suckers, for having faith in the word of another.” That’s the attitude. “Stomp on the gentle and kind. Stomp on those who refuse to stomp.” Sure, there is the mumbo jumbo that “it’s okay to give - AS LONG AS ...” There is always the disclaimer, the qualifier, the parenthetical contingency. In reality, it’s none of those things. It’s a veiled justifier for not giving a f*ck. It’s a carefully crafted logical sounding apologetic for being a self-centered narcissist. God forbid you take any time, effort or resources to help another person SOLELY because it’s another human being. God forbid someone be kind solely because “it’s the right thing to do.” Because in Randian philosophy, that would be considered being compelled by guilt or expectation. Yeah, I dislike such values a lot; because there is no value in them. Sure, I get the idea of self-care, but I do it because if I’m sidelined, I can no longer serve. It’s a completely different way of approaching life. Completely. Thank God.

[@jessej5840]

I'm gonna remember that one

[@177SCmaro]

Basically, what she is saying is helping others is fine but don't bleed yourself to death in the process at which point you're no help to anyone, including yourself, and don't point a gun at others and force them to give, both of those are wrong. Good advice.

[@Capcoor]

177SCmaro I can get with that. Charity begins at home.

[@Surfingolas1]

177SCmaro exactly. For example, I used to lifeguard at a super dangerous beach. One time I went to rescue someone and they tried to grab me and push me under. Had I let that happen we both would have drowned. I had to punch them in the nose to get them off. My selfishness was ultimately what was best for both of us.

[@bherber]

177SCmaro - That actually is fine advice what you just said, but that is not what she said.... In this particular interview she is pretty old so I do understand her misspeaking and contradicting herself. She does criticize private individuals who choose to donate to charity. Maybe she didn't in the past (?) but in this particular interview, she most certainly does.

[@brianblair3784]

177SCmaro Wow She Knew The College Campuses We're Leftist Pussys and this was when Jimmy Carter Was President n the Energy Crisis around 78 or 79.Im a Independent now I voted Trump Proud of My vote. I left the Democrat Party They lost their Fucking Minds ,The Clintons and Obama Destroyed The Democrat Party They r the Party of Wall Street, Silicon VALLEY, Big Pharma,Military Industry Complex, Identitie Politics, Open Borders,Amnesty, Islam,World War 111 with Russia, Horrible Trade Agreements NAFTA, GATT, WTO, Over 230 Defected Japan Trade Deals, South Korea Trade Deal, Columbian Trade Deal, Panama Papers, TPA , Pushed Hard for TTIP, TPP and Other Horrible Deals .Jimmy Carter Was Just a Bad President not Corrupt as Fuck Like Last 2 Democrats. The Bushes Fucked up the Republican party absolutely a Embarrassing Family and 2 Horrible, and War Mongering, Horrible Trade Policy's, Immigration Policy's, Banking Policy's , Foreign Policy's Bill Clinton was Worse With Trade Policy's, Economic Policy's, Banking Policy's Repealed Glass Stegille Banking Act, Deregulated Wall Street for 8 Years, Investment Act ,Ended N Recession, His Policy's Collapsed The Economy n 08, He Shipped Millions of Jobs over Seas with His Trade Policy's, He has horrible Foreign policy Bogged Down N Somalia, Bosnia was a Hoax War, He Was Bombing Costco, also Bombed Tens of Thousands of Civilians n Sudan, After Passing Sanctions so Harsh on Iraq it starved killed over 500, 000 Iraqi Children and innocent Iraq Civilians and They Should be Starving No 1 n Iraq .Then A 3 Year Bombing Campaigns on Afghanistan and Iraq So 6 Military Conflicts with Bill Clinton, He Gutted welfare, Exploded the Prison Population expanded the War on drugs 3 Strikes ur out With The Crime Bill, Crush The Unions He Balanced The Budget on the Back Of The Middle Class and Poor People.The Reagan Administration was Better than The Bushes , Clintons, Obama,Jimmy Carter, Ford, And Nixon .But My Critic Of Reagan Administration. ALL though He Had the 2nd Most Jobs Created Ever ,He Did Amnesty n for 3 Million Illegal Immigrants would B like 5 to 6 Million Today .He we had BS Free Trade Agreements that Made The Income Gap Wider with Immigration and Trade Policy's,I Agreed With Him Cutting the Corporate Small Business Rate from 48 Percent to 34 Percent it was Raised to 35 PERCENT But But a Policy that Stuck .Also I Agreed Cutting Taxes Not as Much as Reagan Administration and a Spending all that money On the Military along with Democrats Tripled Spending .The Top Rate Was 69.8 Percent He Cut First To 50 Percent It Did Well also Then Cut it down to around 40 Percent or 36 Percent which is Cool but He then Cut The Top Rate From 69.8 Percent to 28 Percent .He Has To Raise Taxes Cause Democrats Tripled Spending ,Reagan was Trying Trying to out spend The Soviet Union on Military and We didn't need to ,He armed Al-Qaeda along with Bin Ladin against Russia,Jimmy Carter Started The Policy Failure. REAGAN could have cut Taxes From 69.8 to 50 Percent Like He did then To 38 or 36 Percent. AND not spend most so Much Money on the Military, and Yes We Had 16 Million Jobs Created under Reagan Administration, And GDP was 3.5 Percent Well Same amount of Jobs or More would have been Created ,There would have been less Debt ,and Not Deficits .Now Democrats controlled The House and Senate. THE Tripled Spending Reagan did Try stopping that ,Also the military Spending wss Stupid The Soviet Union was not Coming affter us .And the Tax Rate was Cut Way to Much I Can see 36 PERCENT to get a Boom then Raise is slowly Ovsr 8 Years Up to 42 Percent Getting Rid of Carried ,Special Interest Loop Holes and Most Deductions for Billionaires .

[@ChevyC-ze1hr]

177SCmaro Exactly. Most rational human beings have a sense for this. College kids and nutty tenured professors have no clue what it takes to succeed in the real world.

[@videolabguy]

Rand is trying to explain color to a blind man.

[@RealJokerx7]

Donahue always played devil's advocate.

[@petert1692]

videolabguy Perhaps she was the one who was blind. She was thought of as a philosopher? What a joke!

[@wtbvideofan]

Peter T, there are some things you apparently don't understand. Have you read her work?

[@petert1692]

Yes, no I also know about her from what I read. We have to be careful about the whole picture. She was no saint, nor did she have any solutions as she believed.

[@clintwhatley7981]

William Broderick. ATLAS SHRUGGED

[@donald347]

"It is only an act of government that you can keep competitors out of your field." That's the bottom line.

[@Forever-my4wp]

So you want the government to regulate Uber out of existence and regulated the ability of companies to merge - do you think this is a proper role of government in a capitalist society or are you saying it is time to move to a socialist style of an economy more controlled by the government?

[@JohnRinNoHo]

Any business can be regulated out of the market if they do not satisfy the wants of consumers. Coercion and violation of rights is not necessary.

[@danielyounan8396]

'"It is only an act of government that you can keep competitors out of your field." That's the bottom line.' - Donald What about mergers and acquisitions? What about targeted market suppression? How is that the bottom line?

[@danielyounan8396]

There are dozens of acts that corporations can commit to stifle competition...

[@blazinghellwheels]

One is a voluntary exchange of private property (except taxes) between two parties The other is an outside group imposing restrictions on how private property can be created, distributed and sold. They are two completely different things that are not equivalent at all. Some regulation is necessary but don't reduce both down to the same thing because they aren't

[@JACKnJESUS]

It's pretty simple. Go with human nature and things work out. Take care of the "self" first (else you have nothing to offer others). Then comes family, friends, neighborhood, city, state, nation. It spirals out from the individual. The socialist system goes against human nature. It starts at the nation level, which is backward. The more central government you have, the less efficient the results become. You end up hurting more than you help.

[@robertwbingo]

Phil Donahue was never fit to share a stage with Ayn Rand. However, I have to hand it to Phil; at least he allowed her to speak without interrupting. Today, the Left will interrupt and shout you down, once you say something, anything, that they disagree with.

[@robertwbingo]

True that!

[@orangemancometh]

Today the Left would have pepper-sprayed her by the 30-second mark.

[@JohnSmith-zs1bf]

Triggered! White privilege!

[@comradekalininkalinych2006]

That's exactly what missinformed capitalists do, once corrected on their vague and narrow understanding of Socialism, they will interrupt you every time you try to insert any further arguments by making baseless accusations. I have debated many bourgeoisie shitbags, you are no different.

[@Batosai11489]

This was a much more civil interview than anything we see today. It's actually refreshing.

[@Licherous]

"the universities are the real villains' truer words...

[@elgrigorio1]

And they're becoming worse by the minute.

[@fastted8618]

If "we" / America, lived by our Constitution, we would not have 80% of our debt.

[@vanscoyoc]

Phil Donahue wants to help people. He should. He should goto his bank account, drain it and turn it into welfare checks. Great. No he wants to keep his bank account and reach into the Peoples Bank Account which is on continuous overdraft protection and feel good about himself by being generous with the money needed to pay all the interest and bills of the country.

[@kielhawkins9529]

Please show me an example from history where communism has worked.

[@GeneralThargor]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. thanks for that, not laughed so hard in ages, you are aware of this thing called human nature?

[@wtbvideofan]

Tomato Pa. OMG, you're hilarious!

[@DarthRaider520]

Tomato Pa what happens when the majority vote rules against the minority on a reactionary basis? Death camps.

[@DarthRaider520]

Tomato Pa what can't handle a real debate? Revert to insults and stupidity? The problem with socialism is socialist.

[@ThomasGlynnJr]

"The Virtue of Selfishness" is lost on small minds....

[@thefrostreport]

Thomas Glynn , I think you're right, in a way. It's a really popular philosophy for people who feel they're superior to others.

[@JeevesReturns]

Thomas Glynn Maybe it should have been 'self preservation'. Without that you couldn't possibly be of benefit to a group or community.

[@LintRiggs_]

FR - When people refuse to see reality for what it is then you're damn right I'm going to see myself above those neurotics. Thomas Glynn didn't rise to your bait because he took it as a compliment and walked off.

[@bernlin2000]

She could be a bit too harsh at times, and her philosophy is perhaps further right than I'm comfortable with, but she is at her best here: her warnings against state-based altruism is very chilling, and her experience is very direct, in that regard, coming from Eastern Europe, fleeing Russia.

[@elgrigorio1]

She does not sound "right-wing" at all. She even stated that she did not like either side, not the left nor the right.

[@BruceCampbell0886]

Using the government, and subsequently other people's money, to do good will always fail.

[@jarls5890]

Do you apply this to: Military Police Fire services Too?

[@georgekosko5124]

Jarl S the services you mentioned are not profitable, under no world could these 3 produce profit. We as a society pay for these 3 for basic services that could not have been provided to everyone equally by a profitable company.

[@jarls5890]

I'm not sure that fire any of these cannot be run as a profitable company. Buy "fire insurance" at your local fire brigade of choice. No - insurance, no firetruck shows up at your house. Maybe shows up at your neighbours if they paid to protect them. Anyhow - what about: Food safety and regulation (making sure the foods you eat wont harm you). Medicine/Drug safety (making sure the medicine does what it is supposed to and dont harm you) Environmental protection (making sure the local factory dont dump e.g. mercury in your drinking water)

[@jarls5890]

+Unkraut "Jarl S obviously not stupid boy " - OK! But do you then agree that taxes are needed in order for these services to operate? I.e. the "Taxes is theft" slogan is a shallow and hollow one?

[@177SCmaro]

Jarl S Government Military and police are stupidly expensive and most fire services are volunteer, aren't they? Not sure those are examples you want to use to show government is good at spending money they took by force prudently.

[@ursafan40]

I have to give Donahue credit. He's a Liberal who had the guts to ask a lot of people he disagreed with to his show. He didn't condemn without even considering the debate. I can't imagine how she would view the state of the world , and of America , today.

[@daffertube]

11:11 annnnd a few decades later Tesla appears to compete with petroleum. The system works! 😄

[@mtnnoel63]

Sleuth ,, what you're not realizing, or don't know, is that Tesla has been subsidized by the federal government. So it's the same principle Rand is talking about...

[@jimwhite9401]

Sleuth Tesla doesn't work at all. It is completely subsidized by taxpayer dollars. Tesla can't build or sell a single car without a government subsidy propping him up. He is an utter fraud.

[@jimwhite9401]

In fact, Tesla gets subsidized from the taxes paid by his own competitors! That's how perverse your Big Government Social Engineers have screwed up our so called "Capitalist" system. Capitalism doesn't really exist in any meaningful way in this country anymore. I prefer the term "Free Markets" myself. Let the Marxists have their Capitalist whipping post.

[@Solerisa]

Tesla is still a niche market. It doesn't really compete with the big companies. At least 20 to 30 more years will be needed for solar or electric power to become mainstream.

[@Solerisa]

And the decision for electric power to become mainstream will have come from the government, not from the people.

[@MORE1500]

The heart of man is desperately wicked. Rand was a perfect example of that.

[@j.9970]

One of the most brilliant minds of the 20th century!

[@twochordcool]

J. B. According to complete fucking idiots.

[@j.9970]

Yes - today too - Ayn Rand is a GREAT message for the 21st century to counter the parasitic forced equity of the Marxist left. Her message lives on in the hearts and minds of logical, liberty loving people who appreciate independence and the liberty to choose independence instead of suffocating socialist altrusim.

[@twochordcool]

Shekelwitz Subvertstein Godchosenlampshadeberg You’re not clever, you’re a fucking idiot. PS, funny that you ignorant anti socialism dummies never mention Denmark or Sweden. Only Cuba, which has absolutely nothing, or Venezuela, which only has oil, at a time that the price of a barrel of oil is down to something like 50 cents. Moron.

[@shekelwitzsubvertsteingodc3023]

Denmark or Sweden aren't socialist. Look up the economic freedom index.

[@twochordcool]

Shekelwitz Subvertstein Godchosenlampshadeberg They are social democracies, they all have good pay and good benefits. As far as I know they don’t let any of their citizens fall into poverty the way we do.

[@Tenebris8444]

Just heard about her and now I'm just honestly amazed on how I haven't heard about ever since.

[@JonnM]

The job of an interviewer is to challenge: play devil's advocate. The problem with Phil Donoghue is he has drank the socialist coolade and is incapable of understanding or appreciating her rigorous rational.

[@TheNonEdibleCheese]

So many people seem to hate Ayn Rand, even though everything she said was in defense of basic human rights.

[@vaserilo]

genius old lady

[@JeevesReturns]

Mike Sgroi Dr. Ruth's sister?

[@ktsenya2]

Social is defined as the equal distribution of misery

[@simonoconor8149]

Very interesting woman.

[@CrowdControl123]

Ayn Rand was a genius. Atlas Shrugged should be mandatory reading for seniors in high school. Oil companies' profit margins are among the smallest (percentages) of any industry in the world, and their products are arguably the most important.

[@rafalizola]

WOW, smart lady! a lot of MIllenials should listen to this. mmm doubt they would understand it dough.

[@whitepatriarch1708]

they would, problem is they were never exposed to this.

[@VivinViswanathan]

Tomato Pa, with all due respect, what the hell are you talking about?

[@zzfour5115]

She was a hypocritical c*** she was cashing Social Security checks and Welfare checks in the later part of her life Google it.

[@zzfour5115]

Typical Libertarian Douchebag, documentary facts dismissed. Libertarianism is already failing because it uses simple ideas to solve complex problems.

[@DeboActivism]

Failing? Infowars is largely Libertarian and has more listeners and viewers than any other network.

[@tkkesofar]

The beginning of this clip really explains what pushed Ayn Rand to develop her philosophy of objectivism (which I do not support). Growing up seeing Communism and Nazism being implemented by the state asking everyone to set aside self-interest in the name of the state and collectivism, Ayn Rand developed objectivism as a direct opposite philosophy. She believed that if everyone acted in self-interest instead of in service to the collective, it would be much harder for the state to take complete control. Objectivism to her was a way to fight totalitarianism. I don't believe in her philosophy of objectivism, but in this clip she is right about everything else they discussed. It is almost impossible to create a monopoly without help from the govt. We should be thanking oil companies for providing the energy that powers most of our economy, not hating them and having the govt act as impediments to them. And Commnism and Nazism were socialist movements build upon the superiority of the collective over the individual.

[@B4-1light]

Thank you so much for uploading this gem of an interview! Here Ayn Rand is both brilliant and endearing!

[@503easy]

Thank you Phil! You actually let the women explain her points! This type of open, unabridged debate is sorely missed in this country now. The days of Gore Vidal vs William Buckley are long since past.

[@mark3xxy94]

..and yet, socialism was not destoyed, forever or otherwise.

[@smadeintheshade]

Hillel the Elder says like this, "If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And when I am for myself alone, what am I? And if not now, then when?" (Pirkei Avot 1:14). Balance is everything.

[@FireEater]

Ayn Rand a woman who understands the dangers of Socialism.

[@attlee2010]

So how do we get from here to there? What do we do with the existing monopolies? Why would they give up their control?

[@minormajor1]

Brilliant, smart lady.

[@petert1692]

minormajor1 No, you do not know a thing about her. She has and still has fooled too many people.

[@Capcoor]

Peter T How so?

[@ChevyC-ze1hr]

Peter T Nobody is perfect and Nobody will remember you. How many millions read her books and remember her?

[@kevingee4294]

No matter how he tried to change the argument she came right back with a calm logical response.

[@donbags5542]

Lol...they're talking about gas at $2.50/gal as if it's doom and gloom...nowadays that's a great price here in California. *_Sigh_* Dem's were da daze....

[@JakobBruhnke]

The prices have dropped when adjusted for inflation :)

[@videolabguy]

A huge percentage of the cost of that gallon of gas is state and federal taxes and NOT gross income to the producer. In Commiefornia it is even higher. Remove the onerous regulations and the producer could fire a thousand tax lawyers from his payroll and lower the cost of the product even more.

[@donbags5542]

It's around 27% in CA. Not huge, but a good amount. Comes out to almost 77 cents a gal. So today I'd be paying $2 a gallon instead of $2.77 where I live. Getting rid of it would be nice, but when gas was $4/gal here or higher that 77 cents didn't seem to make a dent.

[@donbags5542]

*Jakob* Sure, if you compare the price of Wonder Bread then to now. But the cost of one of my current PC's back then would have been in the 100's of thousands. Having a color TV in my vehicle that could playback movies that were in the theater months ago would have cost 100's of thousands of dollars. Having a color TV in my home that was bigger than 50" would have cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Having a phone that fits into my pocket with included long distance would've cost 100's of thousands of dollars. The poor nowadays have what millionaires back then would've paid millions for. *Sigh* Dem's _weren't_ da daze, lol.

[@Aaronlcyrus]

Only under the minimum wage law. If there were no minimum wage law and workers were able to negotiate their pay, inflation would be reflected in that pay.

[@seanmcardle]

Thanks for this. She is a sharp one. Must explore more. Cheers

[@cindyreynolds4045]

God, now I remember why I can't stand Donahue. An old " wealthy" communist. And Anne is a genius!!!

[@littlewoadie1]

Is Phil really that dense that he can't understand the simplicities of what she is saying? Agree or not, she is presenting her case in the simplest of terms and he keeps exaggerating her points to absurdity because he is either trying to trip her up or, more likely, that intellectually stunted that he really can't follow along. Better stick with "Who's The Daddy?" episodes Phil, because anything even remotely high-brow is not your forte'.

[@sealisa1398]

The universities are the real villains....

[@VodaNegru]

Since rational people get angry with criminals for their predatory choices, and criminals insist they have no choices because we're all equally victims who should therefore tolerate the diverse differences between the kind of victim who attacks innocent others first, and those who don't, they insist pity is always good and anger is always bad.

[@rogerpaquette109]

Brilliant woman....she is right

[@JeevesReturns]

Roger Paquette Tell that to Bernie

[@jarls5890]

A thought experiment: Six families leave on a boat in order to settle on a deserted, but bountiful island, totally isolated from society. They agree in advance to section up the island in 6 equal slices - like a pizza - one for each family. A central circle is agreed on as a common grounds (so they can visit each other without passing over each others properties). Each family settles on the island and grows crops and raise animals for food. Life is good. However it turns out that only one family have a steady supply of fresh water (it springs from this property). This family startes to "sell" this water to the other families for goods. They do not have to do any work to supply the water. One basket of eggs or a sack or grain and you get to take all the water you want for a week. Because of this the "water family" does not have to grow their own crops or do any labor to support themselves. They have many children with their steady supply of food, and in order to support their children they start to increase the price on water - knowing that their five neighbors have no alternatives. One day the eldest son declares himself king of the island. Anybody disagreeing will lose their water. What would be the appropriate action here? Is the "king" a man of great virtue? (he controls the resources and holds power) Should the neighbors overthrow the king - kill the family and make the water free to all on the island?

[@SoliDeoGloria32]

I couldn't agree and disagree with someone so much at the same time lol

[@latenightorgandonor]

Yeah same. People take everything so seriously, everything has its pros and cons.😂

[@khyronkravshera7774]

A company cannot become a true Monopoly without the Govt writing regulations that favor the monopoly by limiting or preventing viable competition.

[@levitd]

"In a free society nobody can become a monopolist." --Ayn Rand's pipe dream On the contrary, in many sectors market forces push towards consolidation and monopoly. It's called economies of scale. (Also, today countries [NOCs] produce 75% of the world's oil and hold 90% of reserves.)

[@mattstone8111]

The eventual outcome of free market capitalism is one person holding all of the wealth and everyone else having nothing. It's more or less a mathematical certainty with the way capitalism works.

[@ironman1233]

Doesn't the state stop people from drilling on their land unless they pay a whole bunch of fees?

[@ethandenton3393]

I like how they can actually have a respectful and enlightening conversation. That's what I aspire to do.

[@nicky3538]

I think Phil missed a key point in what she was explaining. The oil companies (I use that because that is what they were talking about) have the power they do because government has made it possible for them to have it. Somehow somewhere legislation has been passed "for the good of the people" that these companies need to have the power they do. Without some type of government protections there would be more competition among the oil industry. The government taxes big oil and then in turn taxes the consumer of big oil products. Question, do the people need big oil as bad as the government needs big oil?

[@markbrickles8411]

Well said. It is also great the the interviewer doesn't start picking on her and getting the audience to pack attack her like they do nowadays

[@alleykitty2131]

Ayn Rand=great mind. Phil Donahue=another cliche liberial.

[@VodaNegru]

Habitual altruism is not cannibalism, it's self-inflicted slavery. What people call "altruism" is really only the same ages-old stance of "buy-you-low to sell-me-high" subjective and adversarial hypocrisy that criminals always take towards their victims, where they insist that suicidal masochism should be their (victims) highest moral virtue, and hurting the criminals' feelings by "offensively" daring to accuse them of their crimes should be the only real crime. But real altruism, also known as empathy, charity, or "Love," is the most coldly-calculating intellectual stance one can take. It's the simple desire to disarm one's potential enemies - to cancel their fear and negate their greed, by making them feel safe and happy, respectively. It only becomes suicidal masochism when those others don't go along and reciprocate. Under the Golden Rule of Law social contract, we only have one right - to not be attacked first - and one responsibility - to not attack first. Those who choose to break this contract, abdicating their responsibility, give up their right.

[@carminesilverado]

the free market works every time always has

[@danielyounan8396]

That's why Ayn Rand needed welfare cheques to survive while her acting career was failing, because the free market works every time, always has.

[@177SCmaro]

Daniel Younan You do realize that Rand, like the rest of us, was forced at gunpoint if necessary, to pay into welfare, SS, etc. Right? And you also understand that's not a free-market. You are blaming the victim for using the system she is forced to use. This is like, in principle, calling a slave who advocates for freedom a hypocrite for eating the food provided by the slave owner. You really need to think about what you said a little more than not at all.

[@danielyounan8396]

You do realise that welfare is meant for people who actually need it. It was not meant for opportunist failed actresses. I don't know how to reason with you folks. She took money meant for disabled/needy people. That's the true nature of the objectivist ideology. Hedonistic, self-centred greed. Why didn't she just pick herself up by the boot straps and work hard like she tells everybody else to? She wasn't even capable of doing that herself...

[@177SCmaro]

Daniel Younan I repeat, You do realize that Rand, like the rest of us, *was forced at gunpoint if necessary, to pay into welfare, SS, etc.* Right? If you chase down a mugger after he stole your wallet and you took back your money how the hell does that make you a thief stealing from the poor? ...fucking moron...

[@177SCmaro]

Tomato Pa "Rand chose to become a US citizen. She could also try to become a citizen of some other country. That's equivalent to an employee trying to find an employer that would exploit him less." Except it's not as an employee/employer is a voluntary relationship. Citizen/state is not a voluntary relationship. Rand becoming a US citizen was the moral equivalent of a slave being allowed to choose a master with a less heavy hand and someone like you claiming that is freedom.

[@Mitzi73]

Damn this is good TV. We will never have it this good again.

[@quicktastic]

She is brilliant. It is best, and in fact necessary, for the bird to leave the nest eventually.

[@zzfour5115]

quicktastic she cashed Social Security and Medicare checks this is a fact Google it

[@dfr3h6t]

Trump is roundly criticized for wanting to put America first. Today he told the members of the UN to put THEIR respective countries first as well. This is the message Rand has championed.

[@freedomloverusa3030]

That guy was castrated.

[@smadeintheshade]

"$2.50 a ... gallon!" A here we are paying more than that for gas and prices have virtually tripled on just about everything since this interview and most people aren't being paid what they use to earn twenty or even thirty years ago. Hmmm....

[@48Ballen]

MS Rand is 100% correct. Oil companies today have increased oil supply while the prices in real money have dropped dramatically!! The interviewer clearly is of low intellect!!

[@ThomasGlynnJr]

Byron Allen exactly

[@TimothyOBrien1958]

Byron Allen He always was. He was just so nice about it.

[@johnorgovan5259]

you clearly don't understand the point of an interviewer, therefore you are clearly of low intellect!!!

[@48Ballen]

I'll put my credentials up against yours anytime

[@Surfingolas1]

Hey hey, that's Phil Donahue your talking about! Talk show God and intellectual powerhouse! (Kidding)

[@LucisFerre1]

The oil crisis was caused by price controls. Shortages (as opposed to scarcity) is impossible in actual free markets.

[@jaythizzle1969]

She's so smart

[@joomlaserviceprovide]

Wow, respect for Donohue in this interview, actually trying to understand, and to Rand as well.

[@kidcitylynnwood6324]

I get her.

[@maxdecphoenix]

Yea, Phil, the reason the Oil man can't charge 2.50 a gallon by fiat, is because when people can't make it to work, they can't produce. When businesses can't produce, they don't need power and they don't ship anything. Oil man suddenly finds himself with a lot of oil and no food. Oil IS NOT MONEY. And of course someone will interject that even though the above is accurate and plausible, it doesn't matter because of mal-intent. Oil man will jack prices just to keep the little man down. The low to no-government society has a solution to that as well: Bread CEO, Trucking CEO, and Mining CEO get together and go knock on Oil Man's door. And when he answers they paint the back wall of his foyer with his gray-matter. Providing a good incentive to Oil Man's replacement to keep the ship running smooth. No war. No catestrophic shortages. just one idiot dying for one idiot's own mistakes. Imagine that....

[@matthewmalpeli]

Which is why she died receiving Medicaid and Social Security...

[@brucecurtis9368]

That's not charity by any means. Check you pay stub if you don't believe me.

[@bradw2k]

Wrong.

[@conveyor2]

Pretty sure she paid far more in than she ever took out.

[@abdullahoblongata5537]

How come she ended up on social security and Medicare?

[@deborahdunlap7168]

I considered this way of thinking when I was 11 years old when I read Atlas Shrugged. I outgrew it. Grow up. This is just an excuse to justify screwing everyone else and "not feeling guilty." However if one who believes this would suddenly decide to change and be altruistic, without doing the work of getting to know himself or herself, the shift would still be for shallow, externally gratifyingly selfish reasons: the accolades, the feeling of being a good boy or girl...still external, childish reasons. Please look more deeply than what people think about you (the simplistic altruism) and please look a world with totally unchecked forces, the lawless old west, where whoever has the biggest gun can control the freedoms of everyone else, where murderers, child molesters, and rapists can do what they want and continue to do what they want without any chance of punishment, or look at where the company pays you and then sells you everything you need at inflated prices, thus getting their money back, because you are in a certain locale and need a job. The real cannibalism is eating others for your own gratification, which is what this philosophy proposes. When I was young, I was taught and used to think that unions were "socialist evils." Then I worked in a nonunion manufacturing company. I saw minimum wage workers scarred from acid burns and fires. The company made them sign an agreement not to sue when they hired on, but (oh so big of them) if an employee became injured, it ensured them a job for life (at minimum wage, which oh-by-the-way would not exist, either, if Ayn Rand's "philosophy" became government policy). There was a minimum of one fire, explosion, or toxic gas leak once per shift at this company, all never reported to government, media, nor anywhere else. Many people had been hurt. Some had been killed. I was very young and became very depressed to think that this was the way the world was. I was joyfully relieved when, after two years, I found another job. Working there, in a professional, respectful environment full of hard working, intelligent engineers, I thought I had died and gone to heaven. The first company was the only major employer in the area for many miles. I was lucky. I did not get hurt and I could move. Not everybody could due to family. How is letting a company like this do whatever it wants to employees freedom? It is freedom for whoever has the money. It is not freedom for a young person starting in life who has to find a job in his or her area. It is okay to injure, maim and kill people to save money? Tell me, do you call this Christian? I know that management all called themselves Christian. I would beg to differ. As a starting point to try to think of something more, consider enlightened self-interest. If we lived in a world that is healthy, peaceful, and prosperous, then YOU will be healthy, peaceful, and prosperous. And if you call yourself a Christian, do you really think "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." fits with this philosophy? You may not fully understand why this is the Golden Rule, but if you profess to be a Christian, and you also are a follower of Rand, how, in God's name, do you reconcile allowing entities that ? While to "sacrifice' or give to others for the sole purpose of feeling good about yourself is as not giving anything at all, there is a deeper understanding and reason for doing so. It takes a lot of work to reach this understanding. It requires getting completely honest with your true self and not looking for shallow excuses or external approval.

[@sequorroxx]

"Grow up" Elitist virtue signalling, ladies and gents.

[@suckmentality]

Deborah Dunlap The "lawless old west" was anything but lawless. Your understanding of history has been fundamentally flawed by Hollywood. It might not be your fault, it's a primary trait of lefties to skew history whether intentionally or not.

[@PaulSouthernCross]

@4:30 "In a Free Society no one can become a monopolist or a dictator." Tell that to Google. They're both.

[@NormanLy101]

Altruism is immoral. You should go first. You should take care of yourself first and foremost if you decide to help others. As a moral virtue altruism fails miserably. It is the same as charity with someone elses money, because is the moral thing. The say of the owners of the money is irrelevant. But altruism is the excuse of the state or all those who want to look virtuous to rob all of us for the sake of virtue.

[@ChevyC-ze1hr]

Habitacion 111 exactly. Sweden is harvesting the results of the Altruistic viewpoint.

[@SCROGY]

She's a genius. And today she's ever more spot on. With social media if you are an unethical businessman, society can exercise it's vote by rapidly spreading word.......something that did not exist until the world wide web became......world wide.

[@truthseeker3857]

This is one sick human being.

[@corryburton9252]

he is right btw monopolies are made by gov look at tobacco, oil, and gov even decides the medicines and food you can have.

[@mattgraham296]

I heard her out and her logic is tragically flawed. It's really sad to think that people believe this nonsense about the self correcting free market. She's wrong about everything and she's a corporate idealist. In the real world, those who have money have the power to influence the govt. I'll use as much evidence as she does to back my claim...

[@spracketskooch]

Yeah, and they have that same power no matter the system of government, and will continue to have it as long as money is valuable and people keep buying their goods and services. Which do you want to have power in your life, greedy assholes without armies, or greedy assholes with armies? Existence is fundamentally unfair, and to be is to suffer. The question is how to mitigate those factors as best we can. No system is perfect, and so system ever will be, but there are degrees of imperfect, and socialism ranks lower on that scale than capitalism as demonstrated by history and current reality.

[@seanmorgan8128]

that's the problem government.

[@mattgraham296]

spracketskooch we don't have to be stuck to binary options. It's not a matter of socialism vs capitalism. It's using all of the tools we have to evolve as a species. Democratic socialism would be nice. In the US we already have some socialism (Medicare, Military, Police, etc) but you'd be hard pressed to find democracy. Until libertarians and liberals can unite on the right to privacy, the desire for clean water air and food, and ending military conflicts we will continue to be ruled by the wealthy few under the guise of binary choices that end with the same result.

[@mattgraham296]

Sean Morgan Government is the problem because they are bought off by corporations. We can theoretically vote our way to fixing the problems of government but we have no say when it comes to our corporate masters.

[@WhyNotTruth]

7:20 I think we can all see today that big oil would dominate with or without gov. intervention. More flawed logic stated as fact. "If only gov. wouldn't interfere there would be no monopolies." Who actually believes that? You see it happening all over without a strong state to sanction it. You even have anti-monopoly laws in the US! So the gov. is helping monopolies and creating laws to fight them at the same time?

[@Amish_Avenger]

What she's saying is a stretch. self sacrifice is perfectly fine if it's your own choice. She equates forced self sacrifice (Nazism)with choosing to do so (a nun working for free at a Catholic clinic). That's idiotic. Her economics is on point though.

[@JohnRinNoHo]

?The very first thing she says is that doing good for other people is fine if it is your own choice.

[@Amish_Avenger]

No, she said doing good for other people is fine IF it isn't self sacrifice or your primary goal. Not the same thing and not what I was talking about.

[@Amish_Avenger]

+Tomato Pa because being forced to do something with the government is difference than choosing to do business with a private entity. Don't want a product from wal-mart? You can go down the street and buy it from somewhere else (or don't, your choice). If wal-mart wants to stay competitive, they must compete their prices with those around them because I have the option to go elsewhere. It's not just wal-mart or bust. If I wanted to do business in a country however, it's either their way or the highway. I can't walk down the street to another government agency and "compare prices or level of service". Forced contract with the government is different because they are a real monopoly with the power to keep it at all cost.

[@vaibhav2k13]

Negrolas Maybe she meant that one should first make sure that oneself is self sufficient before helping others. A millionaire donating $5000 wouldn't be self sacrifice but a person living paycheck to paycheck doing that would be.

[@Amish_Avenger]

Vaibhav C Anil well that's my problem. Comparing that to forced sacrifice, like dictators and Nazism is ridiculous. Yes, she might not understand it and personally think it's wrong but to compare it to Hitler? absolute nonsense. Maybe that person doesn't value wealth like she does and they are perfectly happy living paycheck to paycheck AND giving some things up for people. That's not the same thing as stalin and what he did to the Ukrainian farmers. Such a silly notion.

[@johnpaglia8231]

An altruist doesn't look for applause and doesn't force others to give of themselves... which is why Hollywood is as far from altruism as possible.

[@leogeman]

Typically, she's not really giving any logical arguments for her point of view but only giving her personal list of grievances. She's saying, " If only everyone would do as I say everything would be alright ". That's not a real philosophy.

[@BrenLynne]

She was on medicare and collecting social security at the time of this interview -- a hypocrite to boot. She's like L. Ron Hubbard, a charlatan peddling mediocre science fiction as philosophy.

[@ronthuomas7428]

+Bren Lynne She paid in. I intend to collect at retirement.Been paying in 37 years and counting.Not collecting is altruism.And that would have been ironic.

[@Saint_nobody]

Ain't that how every woman "debates" ?

[@BrenLynne]

Yes, she paid in (coerced under force, she'd say) so she is totally entitled to collect. She was advised to as medical expenses would have wiped her out financially, being the #1 reason for bankruptcies in the US. When she was no longer capable of acting as a selfish individual, she found herself dependent on the civil collective. She could have chosen to simply die a martyr, instead she abandoned her philosophy, in deed if not word. I guess she misses the point that those prohibitively high expenses are the result of a capitalist profit-driven health care system, and only a public social system makes them affordable. You know, the kind of system most of the advanced developed world enjoys?

[@ronthuomas7428]

+Bren Lynne She played by the rules.You wanted her to suffer her awful beliefs. Cause conservatives are ugly n mean n stuff

[@brandonc6916]

If I had a time machine that could only do a single one way trip, I would go back and punch Phil Donahue in the face. Really, really hard.

[@Solerisa]

She is not right about competition either. We now have seemingly competition between different products that are owned by the same group of companies. There is no real competition.

[@FootScientificStore]

What Rand ignores (I think for affect) is that altruism is indeed a personal virtue - just not when compelled by government.

[@veritasmastix7189]

She was IRONCLAD. She went on television during the Oil shortage (during Carter stagflation & the OPEC blockade) and told them that everything they were complaining about was their own fault for building up an altruistic welfare state (which resulted in default on gold and stagflation). Giving children bitter medicine.

[@larryk769]

What she advises is no government intervention. With this there would be no monopolies. Patents are a form of government intervention. Also research and development from public universities are government intervention. So no research from these universities would be available to the corportations. To be pure to her word Ayn Rand would have to be ok with doing away with all corporate patents. If you invent something and from day one when you introduce this product into the market anyone can buy this product analyze this product and begin copying said product. And immediately compete against you in the market. This includes drug patents. I can go with that. This was the rule of the land prior to the 1790's.

[@EgoEroTergum]

I wish debates were like this these days. Look at that: She gets to say her entire point, he speaks in clear concise sentences and gives her the benefit of the doubt. I don't quite agree with everything they're saying, but I like both of them because they sound like are actually interested in what the other thinks.

[@fubaralakbar6800]

It's perfectly fine to help people. It's what we're here for. It's not okay to force people to help others. It's not okay to force others to accept your help.

[@XiaoPatatota]

Such decency in a host with a different opinion to allow the guest to give a full argument without interruptions and attacks is no longer seen in media today.

[@josephstalin8516]

A true industrialist/capitalist would not irrationally increase prices...He would understand that there is a sweet spot where supply meets demand and that leads to the most profits. Simple law that is taught in intro-level economic courses.

[@davehigh6786]

She lived on social security. Back in the late 1920s, as Ayn Rand was working out her philosophy, she became enthralled by a real-life American serial killer, William Edward Hickman, whose gruesome, sadistic dismemberment of 12-year-old girl named Marion Parker in 1927 shocked the nation. Rand filled her early notebooks with worshipful praise of Hickman.

[@j4jerkymailcom]

Let me ask then what happens in a case of a lobbying( a notion where all the competitors agree upon a price and no one allowed to sell less than that). How will the free market tackle that situation with a basic and important commodity such as, salt, oil, coal, electricity. Because unlike crops and other necessary commodity, the above mentioned cannot be produced easily ( mere entering the market requires specialised knowledge, huge capital and man power) and even if you get intothe market, the bugger and powerful competitors are going to destroy you unless you conform to the lobby. The theory of free market does not exist, a eutopian market where all sellers are free and able is nit practicle.

[@lumptydumpty6992]

Brilliant point on how a possible monopolist in an industry like petroleum would be vulnerable to competition from equally large players in other industries. If Exxon somehow became the only producer in a free market by eating up all competition, and then proceeded to charge $5 a gallon, I bet we'd see our favorite bookseller/online retailer/grocery store mogul, Amazon.com, open a refinery or two (and deliver fuel to your house via drone?).

[@veraswimming]

It is so tiring to disprove again and again the same economic sophisms which have been disproved for two hundred year! Ayn Rand must have had inexhaustible patience.

[@LawrenceCarroll1234]

When Rand started defending the oil companies (around 4:35), it is unfortunate that Phil Donahue did not then proceed to ask her what she thought of the subsidies that they receive from government (and had for many decades prior to this interview --and still do), and if government subsidies were something that her idea of a free market endorsed. Personally, I love her basic philosophy (which, like Ron Paul, I will refer to as "real capitalism"), but the way she sometimes applies it belies an ignorance of the screwy, complex, corrupt form of capitalism that we have always had. Many seem to believe that Rand was knowingly advocating the system that we are in -- that secretly she must have been rubbing her palms together in maniacal, satanic glee thinking, "Yahaha! I have them all fooled! They are unwittingly funding with their tax dollars a system that punishes the producers and rewards the corrupt and incompetent! But I have them thinking the opposite is the case! Heh heh heh!!" Maybe her critics are right about her, but I think she simply didn't see all the hidden chicanery. I know that much of my early years, I knew nothing of how our government operated -- and for whom . .

I LOVE HER! SHE is what the foundation of america has been built upon. Please read her books! Thank you for the post!

[@nn-yb6fd]

BINGO! She was genius! Good lesson for today's MUTANT society!

[@mourningwarbler]

ECONOMICS IN ONE LESSON: THE SHORTEST & SUREST WAY TO UNDERSTAND ECONOMICS by Henry Hazlitt "The extent of Hazlitt's formal schooling was slight, a year and a half at City College in New York. Perhaps the fact that he was relatively unspoiled by the influences of the academy allowed him to gain such profound insight into economics." --Steve Forbes, January 1996

[@calpurniawhitney8193]

Her theories are just that. We have seen that they have not worked in practise. Thanks for sharing.

[@needs2know1]

Dry interesting point of view but John Rockefeller DID corner the market and literally went after competition ruthlessly and then had the power to change laws to favor the corporation. I believe in free enterprise but there are cases when it backfires. What if private military gets more powerful then the government? I don't know.

[@bobw2829]

How do you explain Standard Oil?

[@slomnim]

and now, decentralized services via blockchain technology. welcome back to the evolving unstoppable free market

[@firecloud77]

*0:01* "I wanna help people. I wanna do good for other people." --Phil Donahue *"If I knew for a certainty that a man was coming to my house with the conscious design of doing me good, I should run for my life." --Henry David Thoreau*

[@nonconforumity]

firecloud77 As in the famous line, "I'm from the government and I'm here to help".

[@eugenialord9392]

Thoreau didn't understand that, in an industrialized society, enough wealth could be generated to support everyone--even those put out of business by industrialization. Our problem is that our gov't/laws have allowed the owners of the industry to pocket all the resulting wealth, even while wiping out competition and automating most of the jobs.

[@177SCmaro]

Eugenia Lord Yeah, stupid laws letting people keep what they earn/produce as a result of what customers agree to pay them. They shouldn't be allowed to do that. Why doesn't the government step in and tell everyone what they are allowed to keep? After all, if politicians took that money away from the people who earned it they could use it to give to other people who say they really need it, and are totally not greedy, in exchange for votes so that these good politicians who are so generous with other people's money can stay in power for a long time.

[@eugenialord9392]

The gov't already "steps in & tells everyone what they're allowed to keep." And then the gov't gives that money to the rich.

[@177SCmaro]

Eugenia Lord Actually "the rich" pay far more in taxes then they receive in services and "the poor" pay far less in taxes then they receive in services. Not say government dosn't use any of the money they steal to give to rich people, but, clearly, "the poor" are getting the lion's share of the stolen loot that government steals.

[@metaldetectingwithlugnut]

Phil's description of the "Pie in the Sky" Free Market theories is even more true of the inevitable failures of Socialism.

[@AbB-nv2wk]

Man sacrificing wasnt a concept we invented. It is what men do as needed. We protect the tribe, the city, the family, and that involves risking our lives. This is natural, if we lived as selfishly as possible we would lose more ultimately. So we sacrifice if needed

[@MOTOPAC]

Ayn Rand received Social Security in her old age. Social Security sounds like socialism to me and a few billion people. Also the Armed Forces, Police and Fire Departments and maintaining local and national infrastructure.