Ayodhya Verdict: Highlights of Ram Mandir - Babri Masjid Case | 2019 Supreme Court Judgment

This judgment was noted for it being long-drawn and was found to be driven with a lot of emotions and religious sentiments coming into play, with episodes where any bit of coherence was almost impossible to find. This movement that was motivated with the concept of RamJanmabhoomi at the forefront sparked with the demolishment of the Babri Masjid in 1992 was labelled to be an embodiment of the ‘annexationist propaganda of faith’ and rightly so.
In 16th century, the Babri Masjid was built during the reign of the Mughal Emperor, Babur. It was locally believed that Babur’s Generals demolished a temple that existed in that site before the Masjid was constructed.
Many academicians have argued that local traditions, tales and other beliefs should not be taken into consideration while a decision was made with regards to important matters of land acquisition like this.
The Masjid was unlawfully demolished by the Kar Sevaks in December, 1992, based on the abovementioned local belief.
Thlocal belief regarding Lord Ram’s birth place, was upheld by a 3-judge bench of the Allahabad High Court in 2010. The High Court ordered an equal partition of the site occupied by the Masjid.
In the subsequent year, upon appeals by the Sunni Waqf Board and multiple other parties to the case appealed to the Supreme Court Allahabad High Court’s order was subsequently stayed.
It was fixed by the end of 2017 that February, 2018 would mark the commencement of the final hearing on this case. Another interesting aspect of the case was the importance it laid on documents in Persian and Arabic from the 16th century which proved to be the few sources of information with regards to the occupants of the site which has been a topic of dispute for more than 2 decades now.
Charting a Timeline :
16th Century- Construction of Babri Masjid
1994- In the year 1994, there was a contention raised before thewith regards to the acquisition of land in and around Babri Masjid. It was also subsequently ruled by the apex court that mosques were not essential or integral to Islamic religious practices. It was also added that Namaz could be offered even in the open and that it was not necessary that it had to be in a mosque.
2010- It was decided by the Allahabad High Court in a 2010 ruling that the land was to be divided into 3 parts and this was done in a bid to settle this land title dispute case. However, this decision was not welcomed by the parties involved in the Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid case and hence was further appealed before the Supreme Court to reach finality with regards to the issue at hand. This appeal before the Supreme Court was heard by a 3-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI), Dipak Misra and the issues discussed in the 1994 ruling, sprout up, once again.
The Appellant parties to the case requested the case to be referred to a larger bench in order to reconsider the 1994 ruling. However, this request was not taken into consideration and was refused by the Supreme Court. In support to this stand taken by the Supreme Court, they mentioned that the 1994 ruling was not to influence the land title dispute as the later was mainly in the context of acquisition of the land and nothing more.
It is also found that the proposal to build a Ram Mandir at the Ayodhya site was an important promise made by the BJP in their election manifesto. Whatever the decision of the Supreme Court was to be, it was predicted that it would be quite decisive in either providing or not providing sufficient support to the building of the Ram Mandir at the specified site.
The 2010 decision of the Allahabad High Court which voted for a tripartite division of the land under dispute was not satisfactory to all the parties. The whole dispute boils down to one single question as to whether the Babri Masjid was built over a temple which was previously dedicated to Lord Ram.
Ayodhya case in the Supreme Court`s 2019 Landmark Judgment and is also the 2nd longest hearing ever which went on for 40 days.
Rapid Action Force Personnel have been deployed in the state to prevent any outbreak of violence. Prohibitory orders have been issued in Ayodhya considering the safety and security of Ayodhya- Section 144 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 which is Power to
issue order in urgent cases of nuisance of apprehended danger.
**************************************************************
For more such insights you can subscribe to My Course
Our Courses:
Course on CLAT UG (LLB): learn.finology...
Course on CLAT PG (LLM): learn.finology...
Instagram: / finologylegal
My Other Courses: learn.finology.in
Blog- blog.finology....
*************************************
Instagram: finologylegal

[@hitorikani]

Watching this video in 2024 after the consecration of Ram Madhir. Saw so many videos about this and stumbled upon this video by accident. Must say this is still the best video which covers everything in the shortest manner possible. Very well done, Priya!

[@saurabh_chaudhary_007]

We Hindus will always thankful to our Jain brothers who always stands with us in every situation ☺️🤗

[@krishivarma]

But Hindus are not standing by jain when they are needing it most for shikarji

[@anubhavsharma1867]

@@krishivarma hum aapka support karte hai. Sammed shikharji Ek religion/pilgrimage place hai sirf tourist place nhi.

[@kalyan8094]

@@krishivarma hum Jaino ke liye kuch bhi karenge

[@AnkitKumar-nu7ry]

​@@krishivarma I stand with Jain

[@Hurricane_Aditya]

Hindu ko kisi dharmo se koi problem nhi hai basarthe koi hamare dharma ko problem pahuchaye 😊❤

[@anmolrohilla8567]

I watched many videos regarding this issue but no one explained it in such a simplified manner as you did.. Thank you so much for your efforts and after watching your videos, I have really developed so much interest in legal issues and current affairs. Thank you soo much❤❤

[@shagunagrawal9112]

❤

[@kunalk8266]

I saw your video for first time. Ma'am this was such a crisp and informative video. I am a fellow UPSC aspirant and was looking for short and to the point video which covers wholistic picture. I am so thankful for this. Keep making such videos ma'am. 🙏🏻

[@pra-meth315]

Beautiful. The way you explained it without taking any sides. 😍

[@stutisingh3547]

Thank you ma'am! You explained such a complex topic with crystal clarity in just 13 min. Appreciation and gratitude.... I am a law aspirant and you are my ideal.

[@ikram4011]

heyy

[@Ulfatjaan1234]

A teacher is a face of God and you proved it everytime right.😊 Thanks for everything 🙏

[@hariomtiwari239]

😢

[@AjayYadav-wx9op]

Hopefully this video will become your most viewed one,among all your past videos.💙

[@_FinologyLegal]

💙💙💙

[@vidyamirji2941]

So nicely explained.

[@khawajaarshad6858]

Hi. Your. Speech. Is. Very. Fine. So. Much

[@jayadityagupta6949]

@@_FinologyLegal I love the way you teach you are great ♥️♥️

[@Murkh38]

Ma'am is looking very pretty

[@niteshgheeyal9949]

I'M HSSC aspiratant . I shared your classes to my all frds best classes for revisions thank you didi 😊🙏😘👏😄❤😊🙏

[@namanmishra1977]

Thanks to all my jain brothers 🥺🙂🙂🙂🙏🙏🚩🚩 thanku so much for supporting 💪💪 jai shree ram jai hind jai bharat

[@adityajoies]

This is the first time KZbin algorithm has actually recommended me a video that I learned something.

[@yaks5380]

Mam I was never so clear about this issue, now all my doubts have been cleared. Thanks Mam

[@nazmulhaquebarbhuiya423]

I have seen many videos on this subject but do not understand it well. From your video I understood 100% of Babri Masjid matter. Thank you so much for this.

[@aditivivekanand8425]

Love how crisp and yet, informative your videos are. Helps a lot when prepping for exams with time constraints. I want to suggest that it will be nicer if you can mention some things in English, like years and numbers, then even people who aren't well-versed with Hindi can understand you. Thank you.

[@Aabirhazra]

Almost 2 years. Not a single issue. I Started with Art. 12 and 13 - doctrine of eclipse and doctrine of severability. Priya ma'am is the best 🇮🇳💪 Thank You for guiding us... ❤️

[@amankant9734]

Kudos to the efforts and the facts that you have provided..and i was trying to know the concept but i haven't got any but after looking at your video i m totally satisfied... Thank you so much.. 🙌🙌

[@syedfaheem6768]

So what do you understand,,,are muslims not deprived from justice of having masjid

[@pradipjadhav980]

Awesome explaination mam. I was trying to cover the news for understanding of the whole case, I stuck in Political view of the case. Like when area was locked/opened or who was benefited from the case. But you have cleared the whole concept in nice and lucid manner. Also gave the legal angel to the topic. Thanks a lot. I found this channel now and will go to your earlier videos and I am sure it will be enriched with best knowledge. Good luck!

[@aditigupta2105]

The most unbiased !

[@amankant9734]

And full package of facts and figures also.

[@1993subha]

Exactly

[@aleenaelzabiju690]

I actually searched for an appropriate video on this topic but didn't find any as good as yours. Fantastic quality of narrating, content that too without any bias . Loved it 😍❤️❤️

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thank you 😊

[@opsagar9413]

@@_FinologyLegal love u

[@sanyasisabat7074]

@@opsagar9413 tharki sala

[@gamingdude0707]

@@_FinologyLegal the land given to wakf board is in the Ram Mandir area of Ayodhya or different land portion

[@Carryminati-io5qh]

​@@opsagar9413usne thank you bola h

[@shrishtigupta5420]

Note: Adding an important date 22nd January 2024 the consecration ceremony of Ram Mandir...

[@doyalfrancis4660]

Eager to know the story behind it... Thank you so much dear. 😍

[@tenzindajon]

I can become a lawyer, if I will get teacher like you...... I was never aware of the history behind it. But today I am able to both sides of the story. Because neither I am Hindu nor Muslim.... I just want peace and harmony be prevail...... Thanks a lot dear.... Mam..... Love your work.....!!!

[@rahulrai6822]

The best part of this video is that you wrap up the whole in 13 minutes and covers almost 90% core part of the verdict.

[@amaanrahee9102]

Perfect unbiased explanation...thatswhy I love Priya mam

[@pragyasingh9959]

Amazing teaching.....I am in class 8 and I understood everything you taught

[@mishty5171]

😂😂

[@janwi05]

Abhi 9 th me hogi 🙃. All the best agle saal ke liye .10th hai na

[@kameshkumarsahu5583]

Ja ke khel kud baad me to padhna hi h 😂😂

[@The1weone]

@@kameshkumarsahu5583 learning ki koi age nahi hoti

[@probhashsaha1701]

Bhai 12th clear ho gya???

[@manavaundhkar5874]

Thank you for the Worthy and intricate yet simplified explanation.

[@gauravk7343]

Ur iq and memory is so sharp ..u got talent girl..keep rocking

[@siyarawat3274]

@Utsab Banerjee sahi h boss😞😂😂😂😂

[@kushagramishra341]

@Utsab Banerjee jo bhi mam samjhati accha hai

[@kajalchaudhary1219]

Wese they have a big team of research. Ye sirf bolne ati h

[@TheWanderingMonk_]

Jai Shree Ram

[@LawStudioAssociates]

Ab samjh aayegi puri kahaani aapka hi intizar tha Mam Aapko dekh kar motivate hote hai hum

[@music4u98]

Absolutely wonderfully explained. just shows your immense reading and knowledge. Keep it up!

[@komalagrawal1166]

One of the best video ever I hv seen in this topic♥️ very well explained..thank you 😇

[@Supriya_sakarvar]

I was eagerly waiting for your video u clear all my doubts regarding this issue . Such a awesome video...n mostly your voice..😍😍

[@abhinavjain6335]

This is one channel where i can agree with you without checking facts! Great Job!

[@mujtabaakhan823]

A born teacher...best of luck in life. your husband is a lucky guy..😊

[@dulalbarman4027]

Is she got married?

[@ipc3024]

What a wish🤣🤣

[@dulalbarman4027]

@@rajhtc355 look your face at the mirror properly.

[@dulalbarman4027]

@@rajhtc355 bustard

[@aditichouhan6110]

Don't compare her professional life with person life. Person life each and every one almost same.

[@georgemcconnell4192]

Far better than dhruv rathee Keep it up .you will go very far👏🏻

[@shridharbhawar4013]

Yes for Unbiasedness

[@niru3849]

Wonderful Content, loved it. I thought this would be recent uoloaded video but I am surprised that U hv posted this 4 yrs back.

[@resmagopinath1433]

Thank you so much for the subtitles ma'am

[@shivanianeja1223]

Way to go girl... brilliant job done.

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thanks!

[@shwetaprasad2619]

No body could have explained it better! 👍🙏

[@interceptor5908]

Mandir Masjid chodo,ek Secular educational institution banao..1528 se 2022 tak log abhi bhi Hindu Muslim kar rahe hai.we need to get over it.

[@pranav6566]

😒😒

[@siddhantapratapsingh4166]

I regret why I didn't ever heard of this channel. ❤❤❤

[@mohammedars212]

Being a Muslim.... We believe masjid were built on clear land.... Not on encroach land or forcibly taken from other religions land is not allowed.... If they built masjid on forcibly taken land... And praying in that masjid... That prayers are not accept by god........ For builting masjid any where in the world Muslim give hard earn money..... If they use even bank interest for buliting masjid is not accept by god.... I am just writing this to know my country brothers and sisters.... ..........

[@usernamenotfound200]

It's funny that you are unaware of history of your own religion. Even mecca wasn't built by abharam . It was a polytheist temple forcibly taken by Muhammad. This is reality of your religion! Don't try to be innocent.

[@navneetyaduvanshi7680]

The best ever explanation in short time. Thanks to finology legal team

[@nandankumar3578]

मैडम जी आपने लगभग 450 सालों के विवाद को संक्षिप्त विवरण के साथ रखी एवं समझाने का प्रयास कि। आपको बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद।

[@LawComrade]

We love your channel and it would be really helpful for the entire India if you guys could add English subtitles to all your videos. It would both drastically increase your viewership and also be beneficial for a lot of us. Thank you.

[@psquare2260]

Thank you. Learnt the history for the first time.

[@MCaddon2.011]

Mam se this Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) Findings:** The court took into account the ASI report, which claimed the presence of a Hindu structure below the mosque. However, it clarified that the ASI’s findings were not decisive proof of the existence of a temple and noted that the mosque was not built after demolishing a temple.

[@mouizimran1032]

Hi Priya, Really clear and cut explanation of this issue. Unbiased explanation. Best wishes for your efforts. Thanks.

[@NoorAhmed-ql1dh]

No she hitted one side job A correction mam ASI never said evidence found is of mandir, he quoted "non islamic" CJI said that mandir ko tod ke masjid nhi banayi gyi as no evidence found Phirse ek baar satye pe asatye ki jeet ho gyi Judgement on believe only Rip logic, evidence, proof n science

[@Rehamkarmuzpemaavaishnodevi]

@@NoorAhmed-ql1dh are bde Bhai non Islamic ka mtlb ka mtlm Islamic to pakka ni hai,,,ofcourse Hindu hoga kuinki hamari purano m saaf saaf likha h raam ji ka janm kha hua hai,,,or Bhai ye socho ham Hindu Bhai n tumhe accept kia ,,mughals n koi yhi thodi janm Lia tha vo b British ki trh hi the,,,lekin mughals n hame itna loota ni,,na hi vo hamse jyda alag thee to hamne b unhe dheere dheere accept Kar lia,,,,ek Pakistan de dia dost or Kya chaiye,,,

[@Rehamkarmuzpemaavaishnodevi]

@@NoorAhmed-ql1dh or acha h tum India m rhe yha ab sab Hindu Muslim bhul jao desh k baare m socho,,itna purana matter hai khtm Karo dost,,,socho vo ram ji ka birth place hai hamare lie kitna imp hai ,,hamari side aake to soch Bhai ,,agar tumhare God ka hota to ? Agar uske upr mandir b hota n Bhai to ham Hindu Bhai b tumhare lie mndir ko chod dete,,,plz ab religion ni desh ko aage badao🥰 long live Hindu Muslims brotherhood

[@highsparrow1347]

Ahmad Nurani Asi has said the mandir is of Hindu nature due to Garbhagrih been found in the inner courtyard, Varaha and Nrisimha carvings found on pilllars dated 12th century and jaya vijaya (gatekeepers of Vaikuntha) statues found outside the door. Sc just playing safe. Its accepting A=B B=C. but not sayjg A=C. A is the temple built in reamnaNTS and due to Reamnants its proven Hindus used to pray in the inner courtyard.. B is temple built on Babars orders. C is Babar broke the temple and built the masjid. SC has agreed Hindus have been worshiping unimpeded means continuously. its just not commiting because its scared of violence.

[@mouizimran1032]

@@Rehamkarmuzpemaavaishnodevi i could only give one like, if possible million likes

[@mdaamirraza7160]

Majority of the people are not interested in the case But majority of the people must be affected by *consequences of judgement...* And i must say *judgement reserved the peace* Thats why i merit this decision super

[@mdaamirraza7160]

Well said

[@nidhimishra994]

The best example of beauty with brain ♥ thank you :) Didu🧡

[@jasmeetkauraulakh4089]

Thankyou so much !! It helps a lot !! Lucky to find a teacher like you ❤ Before this video I have seen so many videos on Ayodhya dispute but they didn't help !! Your way of teaching is excellent 👏 Each n everything is explained by you in such a great manner!! Really commendable you are and so your videos, so your teaching!! Thankyou so much di !!

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thank you so much ❤️

[@ShekharSingh-fs5fv]

Dhaansu video ma'am.... I m from Ayodhya... Nd by d facts u explains really well... what i previously known

[@purvang12able]

You always explain cases very perfectly...... It's become so easy to understand...... Thank you mam 😇

[@antimswain]

This is what I call a clarity of thought 👌🏻

[@NoorAhmed-ql1dh]

No she hitted one side job A correction mam ASI never said evidence found is of mandir, he quoted "non islamic" CJI said that mandir ko tod ke masjid nhi banayi gyi as no evidence found Phirse ek baar satye pe asatye ki jeet ho gyi Judgement on believe only Rip logic, evidence, proof n science

[@antimswain]

Ahmad Nurani you came after looking at Dhruv Rather show and U told the point even! But let’s forget all those! M not even concerned regarding what history says and what we think! Let’s hope for a better tomorrow where we both brothers can live a happy and peaceful life forgetting all past controversial days🙂🤝🤝🙂

[@antimswain]

Quite extraordinary fun no bro he is from such a respected religion which doesn’t permit such illicit activities like drinking & all! 👏🏻👏🏻 so he is a teetotaller 😎👍🏻

[@antimswain]

Quite extraordinary fun Yes I know some went on extreme paths! Bdw conflict is inevitable when u stay in diversity! So let peace prevail 🥰🤝

[@NoorAhmed-ql1dh]

@@antimswain no bro i have commented earlier I am a regular viewer of the 40 days hearing of our SC n i knew the truth n have a little bit research on demolition of Babri masjid

[@janakiballavsahu4221]

Love you Priya as the way you elucidate the crux of complexity into a platter of clarity! Hats off!! Phenomenal accolades for your efforts! Best wishes and God bless!!

[@KyariKatha]

R u for real!! 🧐...... how can a person explain such controversial topics in such a simpler words...not being biased a bit...proper use of unbiased words.... LOT OF RESPECT girl!! Live long!! 🤍🤍🤍🤍

[@aniketbelsare3029]

I just watch your monthly current affairs, it was extraordinary, kabhi socha nahi tha itane kam time me koi itane information cover krke de sakata, U and BIJUS are become my favorite channel and I am about to recommend it to everyone Thank you

[@sachinshukla2605]

You just explained the whole verdict so simply... Keep growing 👍👍

[@urvasivibhu1469]

Wow !without taking much time you have explained everything very clearly . Excellent 😍

[@thebonghumor8928]

We support nupur sharma..jay hindu..yaha pe rehna hein to humare tarah hi rehna hein🤘🕉️

[@ayushdoglaaurharamihai1002]

Ye desh tmare baap ka thode h

[@I.am_VeNoM]

@@ayushdoglaaurharamihai1002 Shri Ram hamare, tumhare aur hum sbb k Pita samaan h. Toh haan ye desh hamare baap ka h

[@Captain-Fun-786]

1) eska koi evidence nhi tha ki babri ko mandir tod ke he bnaya gya tha, Archi logical dept ne sirf ye bataya ki waha par koi structure tha. 2) Supreme court ka faisla 2019 me aaya tha lekin babri ko 1992 ko girane ka hukum kisne diya tha? aur jinhone girwaya Masjid ko unko saza kyu nhi mili ? Ye justice nhi h sirf majority ko dekhkar ye faisla diya gya h .

[@OtakuAryan-si1qv]

Kyuki waha par pehle se hi Ram mandir tha... Wo to bohot accha hua ki Balasaheb Thackeray ji ne babri ko todwa diya...

[@Mnnnn223]

Very clear explanation mam.... You really have a nice skill to clear doubts in any topics in a very short period...I love your explanation...thanx mam

[@bharatporwal1933]

Crystal clear analysis of everything about ayodhya case 13 min to understand almost 900 years old history (from temple in 12 century to again temple in 21st century) A big thankyou ma'm

[@aniketpandey1973]

U are the best. U are such a good teacher your explanation method are too good. I wish whatever you want in your life u reach ❤️

[@1297amit]

This video is one of the best on this matter,,, your knowledge and expression of facts by relevant logic and explanation is great. Keep producing such great work. I Just watched it for knowledge

[@upschubbykalpanapathak4710]

I am from ayodhya and living just 500 m distance from ram janmabhoomi. Near hanuman garhi. Really informative video ❤💞💞

[@shanhaider7614]

really apka andaaz bohat acha hai, apko tv channel mai hona chayea sister, ALLAH APKO KAMIYABI dain, bohat achy sy guide kiya hai

[@aakanshasingh5]

Kuddos to Finology Legal!! Thanks for covering this Ayodhya case, which had been going on since decades. Finally, justice has prevailed. P. S - Can you please upload videos on important articles of constitution as well as contract, It's a humble request. I usually watch all of your videos as I'm persuing law and it helps A LOT for all of my exams.

[@AdityaSingh-ku3cv]

Mam,for which exam you’re preparing???Any competitive exam or just random college exam????

[@aakanshasingh5]

@Virgin Singh, sir for UPSC as well as my semesters, Finology Legal's video related to law helps me a lot.

[@ZiyaYusuf]

SC has chosen faith over rule of law ☹

[@Videocentric2010]

Rewarding the criminals isn't justice. Disappointing the ruling establishment might've proved bloody and certainly detrimental to the SC

[@aakanshasingh5]

Dear Philosophers, everyone has their own opinions and perspectives, you are free to express your own but don't ignite a debate, neither be detrimental nor judge others perspectives . Peace!

[@sushielbhartiya286]

“Our respect and admiration for you as a teacher cannot be expressed in words. You make an impact on the lives of the students in your class, and they will remember you for many years to come. Thank you for being the positive change in their lives.”

[@Kubsad2828]

Who all are watcing in 2024 january after ram mandir’s “prana pratishta” ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ like here ..Jai Siya raam 🙏🙏

[@amaxn27286vy]

mughals had a thing for breaking temples and constructing mosques

[@rishidharattnel4100]

Your lectures are very helpful to understand the topic thoroughly n clearly, please make some videos on crpc as well, if possible, thankyou.😊

[@chinmayparmar8045]

Awesomely explained mam Tysm as i m UPSC aspirant i liked it the way u teach .... Lots of love frm btm of my heart......

[@rahulkrishnasahu3837]

Eagerly waiting for this video,whole concept is clear now.

[@Shortslive2430]

Bhai confuse q hore ho aap Asi ki report ne yeh kaha ki Waha sculpture tha but its not confirm k Mandir hi thi waha

[@sandeeppreetam]

Beautiful video, understood such long history by only investing 12 mins.

[@patrickbateman586]

Thanks Ma'am. Your way of explaining is unprecedented.😊

[@subinmzr5884]

Great work sister✌🏻one of the finest explanations and great mode of study. Thanku keep up the pace and u got a sub😍🤝

[@niketh1373]

A great video 😊. It would be great if you convey your points in English so that people from all over India and abroad would understand. Thank you ☺️.

[@akhilsharma711]

But bro hindi is our national language, more people understand hindi than english

[@niketh1373]

@@akhilsharma711 yeah bro I do agree that Hindi is our national language but there are people in South who may not be that good in Hindi but who can understand normal English, I also think that now a days since we use English in our daily lives all can understand. It's my opinion 🙂.

[@ashakiudaan3419]

@@niketh1373 now their are English captions. 😀

[@niketh1373]

@@ashakiudaan3419 yeah now it's fine 🙂

[@pankajbharti3665]

@@akhilsharma711 Hindi is not our national language dont misquote..Read constitution its only official language..

[@virinchiyadav8879]

Soon after judgement, started waiting for your video...

[@IrfanAlam-g3l]

फैसला अक्सरियत और अकल्लियत की बिना पर किया गया है नाकी सबूत की बुनियाद पर क्यों की आज तक कोई सबूत नहीं मिला है कि बाबरी मस्जिद किसी भी मंदिर को तोड़ कर बनाई गई थी

[@colourful_Duo]

Your way of initiating the video is so unique 😍

[@renuchoudhary3437]

Really complete analysis in such a short span of time... bravo...🙏🙏

[@mr.chatterji6977]

this explanation in a nutshell is very helpful. Thank u Priya ji

[@shashwatasahu3884]

Best video ever i have seen relating to this case....Thank u mam for this informative video

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thank you!

[@abrahamkhanman8795]

A comprehensive explanation of the Ayodhya Verdict while it shows clever British intervention in 1853-9 to further deteriorate the relations between the Hindu-Muslim community, to guard their hegemony doctrine.

[@sarahpanapana3925]

Ye britishers hi thay puri fasad khadi karne wale log india mein (Divide and rule wale ) warna kabhi muslim hindu mein ladai nahi hoti 😔

[@sanasarkar9043]

You explain everything so beautifully... Thank you so much.

[@satyaprakashchoudhury1478]

ASI told that there was a structure before the construction of masjid but does not conform that it's a temple .

[@sahil_hasansk]

This lady misleading his audience.

[@amitrattan536]

No asi report says non islamic structre present their listen interview of k k muhmad former asi president 2002

[@user-vp9bg7ox1l]

@@sahil_hasansk of course aisa logo ka pas golot message jatahain

[@sahil_hasansk]

@@amitrattan536 ASI k report me bola geya h wo Islamic structure nhi hai aur ye bhi nhi bola h ke wo mandir ka hai. Aur court bhi ye kaha hai.

[@amitrattan536]

No sahil listen interview of k k muhmmad khan unhone btaya hai vanha jo sculpture mile hai vo hindu temple hain vo tumhe vanha aayodhya main dhikh jayge vanha rakhe huye vo sab masjid ke neeche se mile hai sath hi jo material use hua vo bhi temple ka hi hai

[@rahulpandagale8093]

Beautiful explain the concept of Ayodhya dispute.thank you so much for the valuable information. can you please make video on Hindu code bill

[@rakeshkandi8669]

Madam..simply superb..watched two videos on article 370 and this...regret for not watching this before...Thank you very much

[@kavanshukla8275]

I was wandering why the ram mandir was so hyped but after knowing the events that took place in the past now I got to know that this case was more complicated than i thought....... But thank you mam for making it so easy for me to understand this whole controversy.

[@neerajchaudhary7462]

Mam firstly thx secondly your way of teaching is very fantastic, effective, clear, awesome, meaningful, knowledgeable and valuable.👍👍♥️♥️✍️✍️✍️🙏🙏🙏🙏💯💯💯💯

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thank you!

[@strangerthings2241]

Thanks di.... Jai Shri Ram 🙏🏻❤️🚩

[@thebraveheart3832]

🙏🙏🙏

[@ccr5230]

"Der se sahi lekin durust" I got this video in recommendation..n really amazing.. the point of attention and way of explanation...keep going on..we r thankful ..

[@aneeshsingh7327]

Watching this video just few days before inauguration of ram mandir. Hamare Prabhu wapas aa rahe hei 😢

[@Pathan88316]

संविधान मे लिखा है धर्म के नाम पर पार्टी नही बन सकती फिर भी एक पार्टी धर्म के नाम पर इसके आगे आप खुद समझदार हो 😂😂😂😂😂

[@madhurgaur1150]

Today i wait after 10:30am for your video thankyou so much.

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thank you!

[@bhabnatripathy3130]

Really your analysis is the most beautiful tqx a lot.....

[@yashwanthkrishna1231]

What a great explanation 👍👌 ma'am you are genius, story narration was fantastic, I offer my sincerest gratitude for your wonderful information and way you taught💕💕

[@_FinologyLegal]

Thank you 😊

[@Timeless-dev-31]

00:03 The Ayodhya dispute involves the ownership of land with historical and religious significance. 01:39 Ayodhya's history of conflict and legal cases 03:12 Ownership of Babri Masjid land and the formation of committees 04:57 Ayodhya Verdict: Timeline of events leading to the dispute 06:36 Allahabad High Court divided the disputed area into 3 parts 08:08 Supreme Court reserves its Judgment after 40 days of hearing 09:41 Supreme Court ruled in favor of Ram Mandir based on historical evidence 11:16 Supreme Court decides on Ram Mandir - Babri Masjid dispute.

[@lavisha2208]

You explained this like butter. ❤ Thankyou. I was looking for the best and crisp explanation and I found it