B. D. Bharucha v. C.I.T. (1967)| Taxation Law

  Рет қаралды 78

Ab initio

Ab initio

Күн бұрын

B.D. Bharucha v. C.I.T., AIR 1967 SC 1505 - the issue in this case was whether the appellant entitled to claim the amount of Rs 80,759 as a bad debt under Section 10(2)(xi) of the Income Tax Act, and was the loss suffered by the appellant a revenue loss rather than a loss of capital? The Supreme Court held that the losses incurred in the running of a business cannot be considered capital losses. The debt had become irrecoverable in the relevant accounting year, and the amount had been written off as irrecoverable in the appellant's books. Therefore, the appellant is entitled to claim the amount of Rs 80,759 as a bad debt under Section 10(2)(xi) of the Income Tax Act, and the loss suffered by the appellant was not a loss of capital but a revenue loss.

Пікірлер
C.I.T. v.  Mysore Sugar Co  Ltd (1967)| Taxation Law
16:57
Ab initio
Рет қаралды 121
When you discover a family secret
00:59
im_siowei
Рет қаралды 34 МЛН
Zombie Boy Saved My Life 💚
00:29
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН
L.B. Sugar Factory & Oil Mills v. C.I.T, 1981 | Taxation Law
4:42
Legal Lab Official
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
58:20
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Рет қаралды 40 МЛН
R.B. Jodhamal Kuthiala v. C.I.T.,1972, Taxation Law
3:55
Legal Lab Official
Рет қаралды 9 М.
How to get Gun Licence in India | Arms Act 1959
9:58
StudyIQ IAS
Рет қаралды 658 М.
C.I.T. v. Beman Behari Shah, Taxation Law
5:06
Legal Lab Official
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Ram Pershad v. C.I.T || Taxation Law
4:58
Legal Lab Official
Рет қаралды 12 М.
R. B. Jodhamal Kuthiala v.  C.I.T. (1972)| Taxation Law
22:21
'Shah Rukh Khan Teaches You How to be a Superstar'
6:58
Red Chillies Entertainment
Рет қаралды 4 МЛН
When you discover a family secret
00:59
im_siowei
Рет қаралды 34 МЛН