Richter plays Bach's concerto in re minor at the Moscow Conservatory (Oleg Kogan plays 1st violin)
Пікірлер: 27
@donchevmeister17 жыл бұрын
Richter is complete and extremely bright musician.He plays all the music, from Bach to Prokofiev, at the same highest level! He is the best one!
@twotea2217 жыл бұрын
He started doing this after he suffered once from a "blackout" in concert and later he said that, with the score in front, it brings the performer back to what really was written in the score and prevented from "inventing" things that weren't there!
@EmceeLorder16 жыл бұрын
You can never get enough of this piece.
@AdamCzarnowski17 жыл бұрын
Superb, masterful and completely compelling - the antithesis of so many gutless so-called sophisticated Bach performances, this is magic and almost Stravinskian!
@iguarni13 жыл бұрын
Sviatoslav Richter? Yes a legendary pianist!!!!
@rule91417 жыл бұрын
Gould's best recording of the D- Concerto is his performance live in Leningrad.
@paganviodio14 жыл бұрын
amazing, the guy plays from the orcestra partitur, he doesnt play from the piano part, but he has the same score what the conductor has. an amazing performance. Richter...everything is thought... another amazing thing is that, oleg kagan, a pupil oistrach, and a great violinist, is the first violinist here.
@pbazant12 жыл бұрын
three words - dope !
@ClassicalMMAChef17 жыл бұрын
What a contrast between the 1st and the second movement. The first movement is at lightning speed and the second is slower than other versions. But you can never acuse Richter of not being intense, that said I still prefer Gould's interpretation.
@francescaemc215 жыл бұрын
The concerto remains the same. Richter and Bach rule. end of argument.
@JEP17777717 жыл бұрын
I prefer the tempi and musicality of Gould. I like the clarity of the small ensemble in this performance.
@nwshane16 жыл бұрын
Wow, I was going to get Richter's WTK recording, but after reading that I'm not sure I want to anymore. Since I love all of Gould's recordings, I guess we're basically opposites. Let me give you some advice: you really don't need to insult one great pianist in order to complement another. Both Richter and Gould are great-and if you prefer one to the other, then that's fine for you, but you DON'T need to call all of Gould's recordings "the same."
@sonnym117 жыл бұрын
You are right mltube..you cant improve on perfection...
@francescaemc215 жыл бұрын
so listen to Gould. He's great. get off my cloud.
@francescaemc215 жыл бұрын
It's a Rolling Stones quote. No, I have not heard of David Fray.
@elpolivinilpirrolidon14 жыл бұрын
Clavicembalo o pianoforte? ...dovrebbe essere una discussione ormai superata. Lo stesso Bach non disdegnava di trascrivere lo stesso brano dal violino al clavicembalo (strumenti completamente diversi tra loro). Sebbene io preferisca altre versioni di questo concerto, questa di Richter è comunque godibilissima.
@francescaemc215 жыл бұрын
Here is an enigma: why are you listening to this? I don't exopect [sic] an answer.
@firstwanderer17 жыл бұрын
Excellent, but at the end one longs to hear Glenn Gould next time.
@francescaemc215 жыл бұрын
then I suggest you listen to it.
@francescaemc215 жыл бұрын
Why compare? You like something else? Go listen to something else! This is Richter playing Bach. If you could possibly want something else....go find it. Just be quiet for those of us who want to hear exactly this. Please don't show off your "knowledge" by comparing Richter with anyone. You want to hear a harpsichord. Do it. Sviatoslav Richter and J.S. Bach are way beyond anyone's comparisons.
as a great glenn gould fan, i can say that, richter is better than him on bwv 1052 recording. magneficient richter, salute you.
@sonnym117 жыл бұрын
I have to say...this is way too fast for me..but this is just my own opinion, I personally prefer the great glenn goulds performance.
@francescaemc215 жыл бұрын
The day you play better than he did, post it and we can have a conversation. Criticism is for those who cannot create. It is supercilious and boring. Ouch. I just made a criticism. May it be my last.