Thank you for the video. I’m a neuroradiologist and I don’t find any use for slice resolution values below 100%: slices start to look smudgy and imprecise (i work with GE but i guess it is the same on other vendors). Still prefer to use interpolation only in-plane. What are your thoughts (and your radiologists’ preference)? Do you think it actually improves images or it’s just a way to cheat and say you are doing thin slices?
@Nguyen_MRI2 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment and it's very important you talk about here which not many think of. My personal experience (not breath hold sequences for liver) i would use 100% as you mention on slice res. However, I've seen improvement by doing like this and you will have approx same scan time. Example:. 1 x 1 x 1. So last here is slice thickness of 1mm. Using 100% means no interpolation on slice. So by going down to 0.5mm. Then use 50% slice res. Add slices to cover the same anatomy. You will see that these mpr is better. (from my experience with my rad). Please test and use the mpr in PACs. Zooooom in well and see the differences. With that said. I always interpolate on phase and frequency. This doesn't cost anything but outcome is also better. Please test here also and zoom in on the mpr's. With that said, i don't use this approach on all 3D sequences. For some it's clearly good but for some it's not big difference. So try and decide what's best. ☺️👍
@alessandrogrimaldi31422 ай бұрын
@Nguyen_MRI thank you for the advice, I will try indeed. If you happen to make one of your videos in which you try different settings, that would be awesome (but I know it takes time). As far as I got it, slice resolution is practically speaking the same as "slice overlap" in CT reconstrunction. We use it on SWI: instead of 3 mm, we do 3 mm 50%. This way MPRs are way better. But I'll test on cisternography (SPACE/CUBE/BRAINVIEW) and try do appreciate the differences. Thank you for the great contents!
@Nguyen_MRI2 ай бұрын
@@alessandrogrimaldi3142thanks. I actually had this in mind as a future video. Hopefully i got time to make one in near future. ☺️👍
@aneetaedwards37757 ай бұрын
hi i always follow your videos they are very helpful. i have a doubt , i working with siemens sola when ever if we position feet first for legs, are pelvis examinations we use to get a SAR issues, my line manager said you can position head, but still i have a SAR issue, can please guide me
@Nguyen_MRI7 ай бұрын
Head first reduce this issue. But also check this video. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mX_Ippl_np6je6Msi=uNE6DiLiKbLM8qc2
@sahin3148 ай бұрын
Hello mr. How can I learn all parametres about siemens Mrı for example about "pat mod " grappa,msense or caipsirina, or etc parametres T2 decay, about bandwith and others. How can I learn.( sorry about my English🙏)
@Nguyen_MRI8 ай бұрын
Many great learning platforms out there. Just have to Google specific topics because mri is a very wide topic. Start basic.
@hasanchaudhary89507 ай бұрын
MRI master is best
@Oren5050i8 ай бұрын
Does it work the same for the 3D whole heart?
@Nguyen_MRI8 ай бұрын
Indeed it does
@Oren5050i7 ай бұрын
What slice thickness do you suggest if they want to see coronaries?
@Nguyen_MRI7 ай бұрын
@@Oren5050i thin as possible. 0.9-1mm max.
@Oren5050i7 ай бұрын
I did before with 0.65-0.75mm in cardiac congenital scans. In most, the image resolution was not that great to see coronaries. Thank you for the suggestion!
@emrearslan82748 ай бұрын
I am working at siemens vida and i don't have a coil for shoulders and we are using flexi coil and we have action artefact so can you teach me a solution ?
@Nguyen_MRI8 ай бұрын
What flexi coil is this? Ultraflex 18ch?
@emrearslan82748 ай бұрын
@@Nguyen_MRI yes sir
@Nguyen_MRI8 ай бұрын
@@emrearslan8274 i need to see some images. And i don't know how you position your patients and coil. Arms etc.
@Nguyen_MRI8 ай бұрын
I would do it more or less like this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ap_VY42adsmHldEsi=p8_QunEs9Y7bPLb5
@emrearslan82748 ай бұрын
Thank you sir i am watching right now and i wil try something if i don't fix this problem i will be write you again. Thanks your support