BAKLA vs. LALAKE (Same Sex Marriage Debate)

[@PaoLUL_]

*ano pang debates gusto niyo mga beks?* uncensored: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oYSrq6qteZd-gc0 Debate playlist: kzbin.info/aero/PL1Ixl6AnwG4OiMWkxUiPykxTWH-t2d8Yy LUL MERCH ➤ shopee.ph/paolulmemes

[@boulevardballs6709]

na ghosted ako

[@bigbrainhampter8672]

Lol

[@jacobrev6567]

ok👍👍👍

[@l1qu1d68]

Isubo ang lahat

[@l1qu1d68]

If the ass is fat, ikantot ang lahat

[@jimwellgarcia33]

"Sweet Home Alabama" is way different to "Pare Mahal Mo Daw Ako"

[@eduardoco789]

i laughed reading this comment, believe me the laugh was all about the witty composition of the sentence 🤣

[@jamesbrown1175]

hahaha 69

[@you_are_loved4083]

witty HAHAHA

[@Lixpautanvloggs]

Eyy 😆

[@ST-ye1hj]

magkatunog daw ata ang same sex sa incest

[@qesqaewqueso3916]

One of the best pinoy channels na nag rereview ng vids/content. Hindi lang puro jokes pero may aral din na natututunan. I like how patient you are in explaining sharing your thoughts on topics na controversial like this one, at the same time making it relatable and easy to understand. More content na ganito kuya pao! Also, sharing my opinion, yung goal talaga nung same sex marriage/union is to protect the families formed by members of the LGBTQ community - to enjoy the benefits provided by law for male-female couples.

[@armymanssg508]

Hahaha, the laws of mankind have no authority over the Law of God, no means no, and when you stand before him you'll out that he never asked for your opinion the hard way, God only blessed, sanctified MALE and FEMALE, MAN and WIFE in his kingdom same-sex marriage is the foolish disobedience of mankind, and there will be a reckoning which this Government, not the society can save you, people, from, Rev 21:8-10, cast into the lake of fire (hell) pay attention to the word sexually immoral, it means the LGBTQ community...😊😊

[@markjustinecorpuz592]

pambihira tito pao grabe naman mukha ko dyan sa thumbnail mo HAHAHAHAHA anw salamat po sa lahat ng naka-appreciate ng debate namin. paalala ko lang po ulit na naging bunutan yung papanigan namin. si rom po ng negative side ay ally din ng lgbtq+ community. salamat po ulit!

[@ainee8747]

galeng neo!!! congrats pu

[@haruyoshida2338]

Sana Meron ng moderator next time.

[@henryscarhead6119]

I'm gay and i actually don't like same sex marriage, it sound like forcing people with faith to bow down to an ideology that contradicts to there belief. Marriage is and always be only for a straight man and a straight woman in the presence of God, it's just like what happen to Little Sisters of LA in America forced to donate to an abortion clinic.

[@makubexmeg]

kudos sainyo guys! sana me mag lawyer sainyo and future politicians hehe

[@jericho1642]

same din yung sa debate naman, yung contradict sa side ko na asign sa amin.

[@letsgetthatbillpurr2379]

as a bisexual guy i really love how kuya PaoLUL is educated when in comes to this kind of topic and he also educating others ♥️

[@strawberry2292]

I agree, as a trans woman he's endeed very smart and kinda cool and funny💖

[@jolibitz7047]

BAYOTTTTY

[@TeaDrinker-eq3md]

Same dude. I just wish more people could be like him.

[@makubexmeg]

i support lgtv! jokes aside. point ko naman sa same sex is ung tax breaks tska ung pag namatayan. kasi kwawa ang partners din. eto ung nakikita ko tlgang benefit on why we need to approve same sex marriage

[@TeaDrinker-eq3md]

@@makubexmeg Yes po. Kakagigil lang yung mga taong galit na galit mabigyan ng rights and LGBTQ people. Hopefully magbago sila...

[@seanongjoco5832]

Every time I hear these types of debates, it always sounds like an ego-trip contest more than the actual debate whether or not the IDEA of the topic should be accepted or rejected by society. You can see it on their faces, expressions and tonality. Or is it just me?

[@idiosyncrasy7703]

Yep same here. Tsaka it becomes a shouting contest. Though, I know why it goes like this. Had my experience of participating in one of these in my hs years and it's honestly nerve wracking lalo na may audience. Kung mapapansin mo may times na they'll talk so fast and sira yung pacing nila to the point na they run out of breath. Adrenaline kasi. Arguing is hard enough, arguing in front of a crowd where you can get instant feedback, whether positive or negative, to your statement is another beast entirely. I honestly can't blame them since this looks more like a recreational program rather than an actual debate team nung school.

[@ar-jhayimbuido4261]

Ya, di magkaintindihan. Di pa nga tapos magsalita yung isa, may counter arguement agad na nagsasalita. Ang ending ay unhealthy debate at mga nasaktan na ego

[@ronnce9833]

absolutely

[@notcliehfhord6342]

Yeah because of no timer and having a hype crowd.

[@spinelesswhinybitch8259]

Malakas ang boses at tono = panalo

[@TitoPaldoGaming]

Dito ko talaga nakikita kung gaano katalino si PaoLul dahil alam nya rin yung pinag uusapan at mga pinagsasabi ng nagdedebate. Grabe idol

[@eugene12310mobile]

Nag panelist mode si tito pao sa debate lol pero imo agree ako with same sex marriage for its civil benefits. sa akin lang namang anecdotal experience from fellow LGBTQ friends parang whatever na lang at "confirmation" yung mismong ceremony eh. what they want is the rights and benefits of being married.

[@chieee6609]

Truuu... Yung benefits na pwede nyo ma avail if acknowledged kayo by the state as a family is a huge help. ex. Philhealth

[@nanakirima]

sa true

[@janzzzz4524]

Upon watching this, natuwa ako kasi napag-usapan yung natural law. I am not against same-sex relationship or marriage. Natural law could be anything based on our views. Pwedeng ang Natural Law for us could be Male to Female because it promotes reproduction and also follows what the Bible says. But Natural Law could also mean being honest as to how you feel, lagi kong naririnig sa LGBTQ Peeps na kilala ko yung feeling na na-trap sila sa katawan ng opposite sex and they wanna be honest about themselves and how they feel. Natural law is like beauty, it bases itself solely on how the each and everyone of us sees it. Thus, making it vary from one person to another. As for marriage, it will also vary from one belief to another. As for the Christian sects, they are divided as to how to react into it. some knows that it is still female to male, some now accepts different types of relationships. another one analogy to this is the number of wives a Christian and a Muslim can have. It varies from religion to religion. Natural law varies from person to person, religion varies from sect to sect. Marriage is subjective because it varies from one belief to another. nawa'y mapansin tito pao HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA dami kong sinabi di naman bayani

[@strawberry2292]

@@EnigmazGuide siguro Ang lungkot ng Buhay niyo mga virgin for life😂😂😂

[@strawberry2292]

@@EnigmazGuide "gender identity (biologicaly)- Biological factors that influence gender identity include pre- and post-natal hormone levels. While genetic makeup also influences gender identity, it does not inflexibly determine it."

[@strawberry2292]

@@EnigmazGuide "Does genetics affect gender identity?-Evidence from family and twin studies suggests that there is a moderate genetic component to sexual orientation. One recent study estimated that approximately 40% of the variance in sexual orientation in men is controlled by genes, whereas, in women, the estimate is approximately 20%"

[@strawberry2292]

@@EnigmazGuide kaya teh magresearch ka, Hindi puro kinig parang sa mga fek fek news Nayan na Ang laman ay puro nonsense, mas effective Ang research Kaysa sa manood, PERIODT END OF DISCUSSION 💅✨✨😩🌈

[@strawberry2292]

@@EnigmazGuide Blair white!? You believe to that misinforming woman.🤦🤦

[@earllikwong5852]

You can actually see that the opposition was having a hard time defending their side because in reality, you can't go against same-sex marriage without using religion as your justification, which was evident in the opposition, as their arguments revolved around religion. Kung ako rin napunta sa opposing side tapos ganyan yung topic, suko nalang ako haha

[@jamildacalos6381]

true

[@junreaksaa]

Di kelangan religion. Naturally lalake at babae ang nagssma kht s mundo ng mga hayop.

[@fantasyalover4782]

@@junreaksaa "In his day "the birds and the bees" generally meant only one thing-sex between a male and female. But, actually, some same-sex birds do do it. So do beetles, sheep, fruit bats, dolphins, and orangutans. Zoologists are discovering that homosexual and bisexual activity is not unknown within the animal kingdom..." - ayon sa National Geo.

[@juliane5632]

@@junreaksaa but then who made the title of what makes it 'natural' for only men and women of unification? doesn't it revolve back to religion? naturality is the hormone of your choice like whom to be with (edit : it means sexuality is not a choice, u feel it naturally by a hormonal, genes and environment. This is fact checked by science), saying the unification of men and women is the only natural being, sounds like goes back to religion does it? sino gumawa ng thought process na ito? religion diba?

[@paolom.4646]

@@junreaksaa parang gasgas na gasgas na yang argumento... If animal behavior ang gagamitin mong basis on whether or not homosexuality is natural, edi talo ka-- Homosexuality has been documented in over a thousand different animal species as of now, fact check it yourself if you don't believe me... Religion lang talaga ang pwede mong magamit na pananga tbh, and even then we could argue na "marriage" doesn't belong to Christianity in the first place, so why should you make the rules?. panu pag dalawang buddhist na lalaki yung gustong magpakasal, are you going to bar them using christianity when they clearly don't subscribe to it? napakaselfish naman yata.

[@mikaaachiiin]

29:38 "We are not homophobes.. what we're doing is intellectually opposing same sex marriage. That is different from discrimination... our purpose here is to preserve the sanctity of marriage not to discriminate anyone " pero minutes prior ibat ibang discrimination and prejudice ang nasabi nila against single parents, married but infertile couples and members of the LGBTQ+. Anong klaseng mental gymnastics yan. Salute dun sa group an agree as same sex marriage. they presented their argument in a clear and concise manner. Sayang di sila masyado nakapagsalita kasi lagi silang sinisingitan.

[@ranniemanangan5371]

Fun fact: pwede magkaroon ng wedding ceremony ang same sex couples, pero di nila pwede iregister yun due to our law, unless amendments made to approve the registration.... Kaya nga madaming nagceceremony sa Baguio Marriage is a term used in religion, kung sa batas mas akmang tawaging "civil union" kaysa marriage.. kaya nga civil status ang nakalagay sa mga government forms, hindi marital status

[@hakdog4299]

Dun lang sa huling point mo sa civil status/marital status eh ano bang nilalagay na sagot sa civil status hindi ga married pa rin kung kasal?

[@jeysimotovlogs4949]

@@hakdog4299 may point

[@mirandamaryellamays.339]

Agree po ako dun sa Civil Union. Naniniwala po ako na like any other couple, same-sex couples also needs assurance and binding (at least by law because I also do agree that we shouldn't force it to church) not only for love, but also for the sake of legality. Ang sa akin lang po ay maganda syang ma-legalize para may habol din sila legally katulad ng normal couples like benefits and/or in case something happened.

[@ranniemanangan5371]

@@hakdog4299 di ba ang kadalasan na choices dun is single, married, widowed, legally seperated and so on....

[@jeromearenas8028]

Agree ako dito, wag nilang tatawaging "Marriage" and instead "Civil Union" para maseparate talaga religion sa state. UN lng naman kc ang problem na tatawaging kasal ba ang magkaparehas ng kasarian pero ang Una naman nagtatag ng Kasal ay ang Panginoong Dyos at para lamang sa opposite sex. P.S. sa mga magsasabi jan na hindi naniniwala sa Bible, then dont use the term "Marriage" kung fully na ndi kayo naniniwala. We have laws for married couples but it doesnt mean na sa government galing ang pagkakasal, it is based dn sa religion.

[@makiii298]

kaka graduate ko lang kahapon tapos with honors ako tito pao huhu, graduation gift na 'tong bagong upload❤

[@nekkoguy5870]

Grats lods

[@makiii298]

@@nekkoguy5870 thankyouuuu

[@ChooseUrBattle]

Congrats

[@boulevardballs6709]

graduating ako sa july 8 😆 di kolang alam kung with onors ba medyo bobo ako eh congratulations 🎉

[@alexanderandres1712]

Congrats Pare, next step naman 👍

[@hajiro9061]

About abortion naman tito Pau. It’s a hot topic narin siguro due to the shenanigans in the US supreme court

[@aestheticjedi1868]

Roe v Wade itself was a shenanigan, a lot of justices (even progressives like Ruth Bader Ginsberg) are baffled that Roe V Wade was approved even though abortion is not within the grounds of the constitution itself, so it's the fault of the legislative branch for not making a federal(the entirety of the US, because state constitutions exist) constitutional amendment specifically for abortion. Even if gumawa sila ng federal law, eventually magiging unconstitutional siya via the supreme court. Yes, it is complex and the decision on which period and cases where abortion is legal will be given back by the respective 50 states (meaning each state can have their own laws). I highly suggest watch the Roe v Wade video by America Uncovered. Just want to put this comment for anyone wondering WTF is going on in the US.

[@johndelgado8536]

Ang turnover ng Rose vs Wade ruling at public outcry ng pro-abortion at radical feminist.

[@johndelgado8536]

@@aestheticjedi1868 wierd lang na ang Art. 5 ay walang Right to Abort/Abortion (But right to life, liberty and property) at sinasabi nila na nasa saligang batas nila pero ang Art. 2 na Right to Bear Arms (for Law-Abiding Citizen) ay nina-nullify nila na anjan MISMO sa Constitusion nila. Utak talaga ng Radikal 1+1=3.

[@aestheticjedi1868]

@@johndelgado8536 They based it on the 14th amendment. But they didn't factor in the baby him/herself so that's why it was overturned. They also factor in societal effects.

[@spill3105]

This is a christian country, really doesnt make sense to legalize abortion.

[@antonybonilla5567]

This is why PaoLUL is the best not only reacts to MEMES but gives us FACTS knowledge GENTLEMEN THIS GUY GIVES US KNOWLEDGE

[@helloimron]

Facts

[@rur8480]

dekalidad na content

[@enzy1577]

@@rur8480 Ah yes, quality contents🤌

[@armymanssg508]

This gentleman is as foolish as they come, God only blesses and sanctions male and female, man and wife in his kingdom Gen 1;27-28, no human authority is over God's law, and there will be a reckoning, Rev 21-8, cast into the lake of fire (hell) and never exist again pay attention to the word "sexually immoral" it means the LGBTQ community, that's a "fact" of knowledge you and he fails to understand....😊😊

[@nolol7236]

napatawa nalang ako nung ginawang rebuttal yung pagpapakasal sa pinsan sa same-sex marriage like beh ayaw rin namin ng incest. unlike homosexuality or same sex marriage na pwedeng madefend secularly, walang matinong tao na magdedefend sa incest lmao. nakakatawa rin yung part about family roles chuchu na di daw pwedeng magampanan ng isang babae yung role ng isang ama as if di nageexist mga single parents? dun palang wala na.

[@ivanicedayyy]

@Swish 107.5 what do u mean "how to be a man" "how to be a woman" ??? gender stereotypes???

[@jamildacalos6381]

look , if people can defend their rights about same sex marriage, then y not incest, lmao, in the future, people can now marry anything they want if it started from same sex marriage

[@bin-ladencarim3908]

Hindi rin najajustify ang argument na iyon kaya natatawa ako hahahaha

[@tako9260]

Baka siguro nasobrahan yung kabilang kampo sa panonood ng incest anime/p*rn, they compare it to same-sex marriage which is not related to the topic they're debating with. The main topic was same-sex marriage a man for a man and woman for a woman. They like to complicate things by saying what they have in minds and make no sense with their point. Marriage with their own family member and same-sex marriage is a two different things... Oh my god 😢

[@c731-enfi]

@@jamildacalos6381because unlike incest, same sex marriage has no tangible ramifications, incest has actual consequences due to genetics and the intra-familiar matters themselves

[@Deadeye_Baron]

Ako kung tatanungin kung sasang ayon ba ako sa same sex marriage, cguro papabor ako dahil kung ang pundasyon ng kasal ay tanging pag ibig lamang, ang pagmamahal ay pwedeng ibigay at ipadama sa kahit anong kasarian. Kung pro creation lang ang dahilan para magkaroon ng kasal eh, pwede naman magtalik at magparami ang tao ng di tumatanggap ng kasal.

[@aleisley5797]

Tama. Tsaka marami ring nasa bahay ampunan ngayon. Pwede mag adopt yung mga same sex couple.

[@eirameuh]

based

[@noelreyes9964]

This is by far, your best content. More of this kind Pre!

[@idiosyncrasy7703]

I honestly think the main issue here is poverty. I mean, the less time people use to earn money to put food on the table, the more time they have in educating themselves and guiding their kids. Walang discussion kung ignorante ang public.

[@marjhunguingayan9372]

As a teacher, marami pa rin akong natutunan dito kay Paolul. Thanks for the knowledge. Gandang ipartake sa aking mga lessons., 😌😌

[@amd.35]

Romans 1:16 ‭‭- "Always pray never lose hopeGenesis 28:15 "I am with you, and I will protect you wherever you go." Psalm 107:1 - "Give thanks to the Lord, for He is good; his love endures forever Worship the Lord your God, and his blessing will be on your food and water. I will take away sickness from among you. Exodus 23:25 James 4:10 Humble yourselves before the Lord and he will exalt you. Isaiah 41:10 "So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand". Proverbs 16:3 In-Context 3 Commit to the LORD whatever you do, and he will establish your plans Psalm 20:7 Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the Lord our God.Verse Of The Night po Exodus 23:25 Worship the Lord your God, and his blessing will be on your food and water. I will take away sickness from among you.

[@sushitraxh6736]

Straight male, and I support the SOGIE Equality and Same sex marriage, I don't have to be a fuckn dolphin to be a dolphin advocate, all I have to be is to become a human and let people decide and follow their heart without conforming to societal standards. LGBTQ rights is Human rights

[@ayycute4702]

Yea i agree as long they wont make their children be gay a tomboy or any genders the lgbtq has.

[@paolom.4646]

I suggest you read SOGIE muna, mejo kulang sa critical thinking yung bill, lol, it was vague and a bit authoritative--- I support Same-sex marriage as a gay man, but I also think that we should be wary of anything that people will try to associate with it dahil it can be used as leverage for something that IS actually sinister. What would otherwise be a harmless civil rights act can be a cause for societal decline, so be careful... not everything LGBT is worthy of support.

[@jazzhoarhymestubig8777]

@@paolom.4646 pls expound, napakacircular ng thoughts mo wala kang nailabas na argument.

[@sushitraxh6736]

@@paolom.4646 "harmless civil rights act can be a cause for societal decline," WTF?

[@blu3berrycr3pe]

@@sushitraxh6736 "what could otherwise be"

[@RMPlaysMCYT_Ronnel_Mitra]

22:47 "Q: paano magkakaanak? A: Adoption" - PaoLUL 2022

[@arielyt5167]

Damn chill bro 💀

[@jastinecunanan3777]

Ang ganda ng mga content ng ganitong debate but I agree na sana mas maging formal ung debate kesa parang usapang palengke lang.

[@fantasyalover4782]

Yep, yung ma ala Jubilee ang debate.

[@madjoker5656]

This is why I love this channel talagang thought provoking ng mga videos, yes may mga memes and kalokohan but most of the time andame kong natutunan dito. Yes, sometimes na salungat ako sa pananaw ni Tito Pao pero dahil dun lalo ko pang naiintindhan ung other side ng opinion.

[@ElectroIgnacio]

Sana naman matauhan yung organizer nitong debate-debate na to at ayusin sana yung porma ng debate, hindi man lang nagmamando yung mga host kung sino muna yung pauunlakang magsalita, ang nagiging labas tuloy e nagiging sabong at palakasan na lang ng palakpakan at hiyaw kapag may marinig na magandang salita. E importanteng topic to, na sana e may makuha tayo at mas malinaw na maipahayag sana ng mga bata yung opinyon nila tungkol dito, di yung nagsasapawan. Ang labas tuloy e hype na hype yung mga bata at nadadala na ng bugso ng damdamin kaya pasigaw na sila magdebate.

[@Eggsther]

I find it funny that people are alarmed na mauubos daw ang population pag may same sex marriage like queers existed wayyyyyy before even those terms were acknowledged. Matindeng erasure ang ginagawa but they were always there. Chill like kayo mga cishets, kayo parin naman ang majority sa mundo eh. Mga laws and rights sainyo parin ang priority. Also sobrang insecure nyo naman na magkaroon lng ng rights ang community, feel nyo mauubos kayo, which makes me also question the "validity" or whatever the fuck na ito dapat ang "natural". Kapagod lng na hanggang debate ang existence namin.

[@thrinx]

I have a funny take about them being alarmed don sa population. Like are you saying na potentially you are gay, bhie? And is trying to hide behind the mindset of str8 relationship? Kaya na threaten ka about same sex marriage and about population decrease. Magiging gay ba bigla ang mga str8 pag nalegal ang same sex marriage? 😭 I want to hear more debates that literally include members from LGBTQIA+ community because we know ourselves better and as a part of society we must be heard. Society transcends and kasama kami don. The reason our rights doesnt evolve is because we are kept aside and hidden, they want us to be forgotten. (But we just end up lurking from somewhere tho 💅✨)

[@Eggsther]

@@thrinx so tru like jusko, hindi na tayo yung nasa 18th century.

[@idiosyncrasy7703]

[Copied from my reply to another comment. Just wanna hear people's thoughts on my opinion.] Imho, my main concern is how the norm will change. Children go through a very fragile and impressionable part of their lives. Now, wala sanang issue generally. But the concern comes up when transitioning or sex change comes into play. It's not unheard of, documented pa nga even, na may mga taong ni-regret yung process. Years after transitioning they only realize who they really were. What's their reason for wanting to transition in the first place? I don't know. Why did they change their minds? I don't know either. I'm just concerned that by legalizing same sex marriage, same sex relationships will become more of a norm, that may lead to more of the young being put in the same situation. Of course it all boils down to parenting din naman. How well you supervise and inform your kids about such things. But it adds another layer of concern. Parenting is as hard as it is, imagine trying to provide guidance to your kids about such a complex topic without shifting their views too far to one side risking them to make harsh decisions that they may regret. One could argue din na it would be easier if parents have time to do their job at home in raising kids, but we all know most families need to have both parents working in order to provide at least 3 meals a day. So then systematic poverty comes to play naman. Walang time ang parents to be parents at home. It's just a bunch of prior issues na di pa natin naayos dito sa pilipinas, that may affect how well drastic changes can be implemented into the culture. US has a bit of a luxury because they're honestly way better off than us, generally speaking. My main point I guess is that, there's nothing wrong with legalizing same sex marriage. It's just that we, as a country, aren't ready yet. It may take time, but we need to iron out things first. And tbh poverty is the main most pressing concern. If only people can live life without worrying what to eat tomorrow, maybe we as a community will have more time to be educated. Less ignorant people, more open minded citizens. Change will be easier to apply.

[@Emryssy]

Heteronormativity's sometimes disgusting.

[@thrinx]

@@Emryssy that is actually toxic because they act as if they are the supreme being above all and everyone must obey what they will want. Toxic dominance or so whatever.. Heteros most of the times is like that.

[@norvieYT]

Same sex marriage under the law I would agree. Para ndi tamaan yung mga paniniwala ng mga religions. Hinihintay kong may mag sabi na the only constant in this world is change. 1987 is way different than 2022. We move forward! Wala naman masasaktan jan bukod sa feelings ng mga biblenatics (ndi naman lahat naniniwala jan)

[@The_Hero1914]

I dont agree with same sex marriage.

[@shineinouzen4304]

@@The_Hero1914 same but I respect everyone's beliefs

[@jeromearenas8028]

Just dont use "Marriage" term. Civil Union tawag dapat jan

[@gotensan608]

NMA_YT NO TO TUMBONG

[@UN1VERS3S]

Since the beginning we improve for the best. Basta respeto lang sa sarili at sa iba'ng tao.

[@xyre8443]

14:19 Regarding to marriages, I think it is better that if you're planning a marriage that against the bible, then it is better if instead of being marry in church, just consider being married on paper. I also think the same about divorce, if you're married in the church where you swore to the god that you will never leave your partner then divorce should not be possible but if you're just married in papers, then it is fine. If you don't believe in God and think that it is BS that beliefs affect marriage in church then you should not be married at the church in the first place because it is more of a BS to be married in a way that you don't believe.

[@GMMarlDomingo]

i totally agree. very Simple, If man believe and have faith in God definitely same sex marriage is big a NO. Its against to the commandmend of our Lord God. And Our God want that more People will serve him thats why he gave Eve to Adam. God punished Sodom and Gommorah because of that false practices. I respect all my Gays friends but I totally disagree with the same sex marriage

[@randombsgo1028]

Ganda talaga ng mga gantong vids ni tito pau di yung puro kagaguhan lang (well gusto ko ren naman yon sino bang may ayaw) sarap panoorin kahit mahaba tas masarap pa yung nag cocomentary ;))

[@banbergonia1174]

Bakit ba kasi pinagpipilitan nila sa marriage? pwede naman mag establish nalang nga bagong type of union. marriage is a well established union backed/practiced by religious belief (which has a governing rules and regulation) and acknowledged by our government (which supplemented governing law and order). What I propose: Union Type - Marriage (religion) - Same Sex Union (state) - Sibling to Sibling - Cousin to Cousin - Adult to Minor - Parent to Children - Free for all This way every party is equally offended. naka separate si religion kay state or other entity kung may makikigulo pa. at the same time may leeway ang government to give different law and order to different union. What!? bakit may iba pang entry!? well kung i-acknowledge ng government yung additional na isa eh what's stopping the others to also be acknowledged. ginusto nyo yan eh, ano double standard!? Side Note: - kung babaguhin ang "Civil Status" to "Union Type" for sure there will be repercussions like interruption sa government services, banking, pension, etc... (basically magaadjust ang buong bansa). bakit kamo? eh kailangan baguhin yung Database and connected tools and applications. not to mention the printed forms. as a programmer ngayon palang napapakamot na ako ng ulo eh. - Marriage ba talaga habol nila or wedding gown? JOKE LANG PO! hehehe

[@wrightier]

This is the best video I've watched today. I learned a lot. Gusto ko 'tong panoorin ulit with Aly. Huhu!

[@ryangarcia6250]

Everyone can be a father the point is do you have the guts to perform the role you are given with.

[@규지]

True, hindi ko nagustuhan yung sinabi ng isang debater na hindi daw mapapalitan ng lesbian ang isang ama. Kaso diyan sa logic na niyan parang sinasabi niya na hindi mapapalitan ng isang single mother ang ama ng bata. Hindi ko po alam kung May sense sinasabi ko pero sana maintindihan.

[@cmlyn77]

@@규지 right, parang naiinvalidate nung statement na yun yung mga single parents na gumaganap as both a mother and a father to a child.

[@jahocampo2600]

Di ako masyado mahilig sa debates pero nag eenjoy ako dito dahil kay tito pao, natutuwa ako sa nagdedebate at natututo rin at the same time

[@clarissaayres2060]

Medj nakakalungkot lang na mas marami pa tong views kesa sa debate mismo, patunay lang na bumababa ang attention span

[@Mr.Hamburger]

The Philippines would only become a true state the moment it could acquire the ability to separate the church(or any religious institution/group) from its state. Separating both from eachother would be very hard considering the natural upbringing which most Filipino/Filipinx have, most of us grew up in a strict religious household and only a few are brave enough to be atheists and agnostics. Back to the main topic, the Philippines is long away from being able to call itself a true state due to how closely knit religion and the law is. Most political candidates' campaign strategy relies on winning over religious groups such as the church(christians, catholics, INC) and/or muslims. I find it funny how most people recognize the importance of being able to separate the church from the state due to its implications such as that religion is based on morals, which is very subjective, while the law on the other hand doesn't dwell with such intricacies because of its objective nature, but seeing that most people elected into offices or into senate swear on a bible or a quran is just so funny because why swear on those things instead of just swearing to the people or some sort of moral code which I presume would exist in law in some sort of form. It just comes off as stupid how they are blatantly merging the state and the church. The law is made, implemented, and evaluated for the people and not for the religious groups they are in, the law should not be able to see color, race, and what religious group you associate with, but hey, the scenario in which the state is truly separate from the church or any religious institution is just some sort of fantasy that is only true in some sort of different dimension utopia for the Philippines. The Philippines has a lot of problems, with this issue being one, but there are many more that we as a country need to fix.

[@JRAS_]

good take pero nandilim paningin ko nong tinawag nya tayong filipinx 💀 id rather be called an indio

[@nathanielimpas7207]

no to same sex marriage done by the church... LGBTQ wants respect right? so how about the need for respect of straight people? likewise, the separation of church and state? INSTEAD, YOU SHOULD BE ADVOCATING FOR SAME SEX UNION (civil union) DONE BY THE STATE.😊

[@SignificantPressure100]

Morals are subjective by nature.

[@ryantarbadildo8765]

@@nathanielimpas7207 Of course we are. I really don't know why we're calling it same sex marriage at this point.

[@magbanuamik_]

gosh, filipinx sounds so ridiculous. filipino is already gender neutral. stop subscribing to western views about our language dahil tayo mismo alam natin na sapat na ang filipino bilang pangtawag.

[@J.Orq95]

Ganda ng video mo ngayon idol Pau! More videos na debate pa sana idol Pau para may mga matutunan pa kami hehe.

[@johnbacon1485]

"Nagbabasa ka ba ng libro?" Bruhh hahahahah

[@arielyt5167]

Wait kalang bro may mag dedebate sayo hahahaha 💀

[@maxxicollins2108]

From a historic point of view. Marriage predates every religion, thus; the concept of marriage didn't sprung out of it. Even before pre-historic period, this "social bond" is already in practice although the purpose, as you could imagine, is different. It's merely for the reason of survival, economic, and security.

[@raulgamma8495]

Right, and they act like sila ang authority regarding marriage.

[@maxxicollins2108]

@@raulgamma8495 That isn't really surprising at all since religion has claimed to be the originator of the entire existence.

[@maxxicollins2108]

@@edd112e Unfortunately, religion, this concept of reward and punishment, together with the government, is a very powerful social institution. Some people, and I would even argue that there's a significant number of them, founded their values, norms, and ideals upon this institution. This has kept humanity in line for the last 3-4 thousand years. Even I, as anti-theist, can't deny its influence in our civilization. What we need to do is to regulate its sphere of influence and, unfortunately, doing that is like boiling the ocean.

[@raulgamma8495]

@@maxxicollins2108 Tingin mo, kaya kaya?

[@maxxicollins2108]

@@raulgamma8495 Naku haha mahirap sabihin eh but I'm very certain tho that it won't be happening anytime soon. Mahirap kontrahin ang paniniwala ng tao, it's deeply rooted in their very nature.

[@krawlvincento1156]

Against ako sa sinabi noong partidong anti na "hindi mapapalitan ng isang lesbian ang isang ama." wherein thought na these days, mas madalas ang mga single moms sa kadahilanang hindi kayang gampanan ng isang lalaki ang isang responsibilidad. at isa pa doon, tayong mga tao lang naman ang nag label at nag bigay ng role sa isang tatay o nanay eh. Tayong mga tao lang din ang nag sabing ang ama ang mag tatrabaho para sa pamilya, poprotektahan ang pamilya, ang nanay ang mananatili sa bahay, ang magaalaga sa anak. well in fact, na based on a recent study by the World Health Organization (WHO), Philippines has about 15 million solo parents, 95 per cent or more than 14 million of whom are women. Ang punto ay, ang pag imitate or duplicate na sinasabi ng partidong ito, ay matagal nang ginagawa at ginagampanan ng nakararami lalo na ng mga magulang na mag-isang tinataguyod ang Pamilya. Even the title of WHO's research says it all, "Inang Tatay: The Journey of Single Moms Amidst COVID 19 Pandemic."

[@jabrielramos19]

mali ka dyan kapatid.

[@ryantarbadildo8765]

@@jabrielramos19 ano rebuttal mo po

[@jabrielramos19]

@@ryantarbadildo8765 nasabi na sa debate lahat ng facts na gusto sabihin. Panoodin mo nalang kung di ka nagtitipid sa data. 😌

[@ryantarbadildo8765]

@@jabrielramos19 Di mo lang alam ano ma rebuttal mo. May pa "nagtitipid ng data" ka pang nalalaman

[@Kirs._14]

@@jabrielramos19 yung wala kang rebuttal kaya ganyan comment HAHAHAHA

[@maecochantsukiharu7227]

MORALITY - Principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. IMMORALITY - Immoral means not moral and connotes evil or licentious behavior. Amoral, nonmoral, and unmoral, virtually synonymous although the first is by far the most common form, mean utterly lacking in morals (either good or bad), neither moral nor immoral.

[@minjung9390]

genuinely confused. if pabor ang isang tao sa same-sex relationships, why disagree with same-sex marriage? i don’t get why people say this kasi it contradicts itself. just say you disagree with the movement and move on... marriage the intimate binding between people. the ultimate form of showing your devotion to the person you love. it’s expressing your relationship with the person and taking it to the next level. by doing this, you’re also legally recognized by the government as a married couple. why should it only be reserved for the cishets? if pabor ka nga, then support their most basic rights. marriage. its as simple as that.

[@minjung9390]

also what im getting from people who say na pabor sila sa same-sex relationships but justifies that same-sex marriage should be shunned upon is that they’re just saving face. ayaw nila na may magalit sa kanila or that na may makakita sa kanila as bigoted... it’s just iffy to see and hear that statement from people. it’s like an illusion na mayroon gray area even if wala talagang ganon

[@patricktolentino7266]

Im not against same sex marriage pero I think the na kaya ayaw nila sa same sex marriage pero okay lang sila sa same sex relationship is wala namang konkretong panghahawakan ang sa relationship dahil pag nagkagustuhan ang dalawang tao, sa kanila nalang pag uusap yun ku magkakaroon sila ng intimate relalationship unlike sa marriage na pinapaabot pa ito sa batas at nagkakaroon na kayo ng papel tulad ng "marriage certificate" which is nag iiba na kayo as a filipino citizen. Ask me nalang kun ano yung mga yun hahaha masyado ng mahaba comment ko

[@nanakirima]

@@patricktolentino7266 as citizens DAPAT LANG na makamit ng mga same sex couples ang civic rights na yan. kase kung if u disagree with that, it could be implied that u view gay people as lesser than heterosexual people. hindi dapat ganon. sa mata ng batas, dapat lahat ay pantay pantay. maging ano man ang kasarian o sekswalidad mo (with a select few limitations, of course).

[@pingu6338]

they're not hurting anybody.. so why not? just let two people be happy..

[@lopezmarkchristian5489]

i think before we established the same sex here sa pilipinas we should first established the sex education dito sa pinas kasi mas need natin to to know what gender , sex , etc and in the current stand education we have sobrang baba and by the sex education pwedi natin ipasok yung same sex marriage dit para malaman din ng mga new generation kung ano ba at papaano ba t

[@shameownu]

I think we can established both tbh, we can implement sex education and give rights to lgbtqia+ people as well.

[@juxtgene]

pangit talaga pag sinasali ang religion sa debates, cause most of the time they stick to a belief and find the justification around it, rather than forming their beliefs through its justification. why defend it if your only reason to defend it is “because it was what was written/said”

[@AngryKittens]

Yep. When they run out of arguments, they all just default to "That's what the Bible says!" The Bible also says a lot of things that aren't true. Or even outright evil. Like slapping women for interrupting two men talking. Or enslaving enemies and violating their women. Using it as the ultimate moral compass is problematic at best. The Bible is extremely contradictory. Especially when the Old and New Testaments are compared.

[@vilshin1575]

@@AngryKittens lahat ng nakasulat sa Bible totoo at kailangan malawak pang unawa mo pag nagbasa ka

[@AngryKittens]

@@vilshin1575 Oh really? Which of these Biblical laws do you follow? When men fight with one another, and the wife of the one draws near to rescue her husband from the hand of him who is beating him, and puts out her hand and seizes him by the private parts, then you shall cut off her hand. Deuteronomy 25:11-12 If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them: Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die. Deuteronomy 21:18-21 Whosoever ... hath any blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God. For whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing superfluous, Or a man that is brokenfooted, or brokenhanded, Or crookback, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken ... He shall not go in unto the vail, nor come nigh unto the altar, because he hath a blemish; that he profane not my sanctuaries. Leviticus 21:17-23 KJV Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material. Leviticus 19:19 You are to make tassels on the corners of your garments, with a blue cord on each tassel (Numbers 15:38). If a man lies sexually with a woman who is a slave, assigned to another man and not yet ransomed or given her freedom, a distinction shall be made. They shall not be put to death, because she was not free. Leviticus 19:20-22 Ye shall not round the corners of your heads. Leviticus 19:27 Thou shalt not boil a kid in its mother's milk. Exodus 23:19 All that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you. Leviticus 9:10 When a woman has a discharge, if her discharge in her body is blood, she shall continue in her menstrual impurity for seven days; and whoever touches her shall be unclean until evening. Everything also on which she lies during her menstrual impurity shall be unclean, and everything on which she sits shall be unclean. Leviticus 15: 19-20 You may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way. Leviticus 25:44-46 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ. Ephesians 6:5 Do you want more? Because I can give you more.

[@vilshin1575]

yung iba jan binago ni Jesus noong bumaba sya dito sa lupa,masusunod ko ang iba jan pero kung lahat ng utos e wala pang tao nakagawa nyan

[@vilshin1575]

@@AngryKittens mas mataas pa ang batas ng Diyos kesa batas ng tao

[@nanarong1798]

Everytime na may content si kuya pao na about debates, I'm the happiest person! I like watching iskolmates (although napaka kalat and not organized), I really enjoy hearing other people's opinions from the debates, especially kuya pao. I learned so much from this channel ☺️. Please more contents like this Kuya Pao! Kudos to you and to your channel

[@nraktes5008]

"Pogi si Paolul, respect my opinion." No, that's a fact.

[@arielyt5167]

Damn

[@marklexus27]

Tunay

[@enzy1577]

Factual statement

[@Insecure_baddie]

Marriage is about planning for the future generations. Making a foundation of the married couples’ beliefs to keep progressing. It’s just part of the system churches and governments built.

[@tobiramadesiree8047]

R.I.P Technoblade Simula Ng napapanood ko kayu ni Kuya Kris Natatawa nako Pag Tapos Ng Pagkamatay ni Techno

[@peterthestrawberry6587]

TECHNOBLADE NEVER DIES

[@miameowskie1005]

Technoblade forever king 😔

[@reendevelops]

Bawal ang divorce at same-sex marriage sa Pinas, pero sa Spain na namilit sa'tin maging Christian pwede na since 2005? I loathe this country so so much.

[@MyPapa16]

Ah yes, the classic "respect my opinion" line. Linyhan ng mga fake news peddlers lol

[@JARPIY]

this is more intense than the presidential debate

[@maomao8832]

Same sex Union ✓ Same sex Marriage X

[@arielyt5167]

Sheshhh di natin masasabe Yan Malay mo may sex marriage na sa darating na panahon kaya Wala tayo magagawa alam mo Naman yong pilipino pinipilit yong gusto 💀

[@svenkrules9855]

8:35 "You cannot turn a moral wrong into a civil right." Except, we already did that with the right to self-defense (Article 11). It is morally wrong to kill someone, but what if the person that you killed was actively trying to kill you? Eto yung rason kung bat ayaw na ayaw kong sinasama yung moralidad pag dating sa isang debate. Morality mirrors the society that it inhabits. What's morally right for someone can be considered as morally wrong for someone else. Infanticide in Ancient Sparta is considered morally right if the baby was deemed as "unfit" or unhealthy. During the times of the Roman Empire, it is considered morally right to conquer foreign lands and subjugate and enslave non-Romans. Hell even ancient Romans view homosexuality as "morally right" as long as they assume the "Dominant role" in the relationship. 8:53-9:35 "The purpose of 'True Marriage' between a male and a female is to provide a normal, stable, affectionate, loving, and moral environment for the children." What if the household that the said marriage produced is the exact opposite (ie. abusive, and dysfunctional)? Does the purpose marriage suddenly looses its meaning? What if the same-sex couple are able to raise a child in an optimal environment? Can their relationship now be considered as "True Marriage"? Or are you trying to imply that same-sex couples are unable to raise child? "I believe that the purpose of same sex marriage is the personal gratification of two individuals to have their rights. It's not about the children because to purpose of marriage is about procreation." Bro whut!? Personal gratification and rights already comes with the whole concept of marriage itself! Why do you think there are people out there who are proud to be husbands/wives. Why do you think you have people who are over the age of 50 out there marrying someone who are as old/or even younger than their kids (Bossing X Pauleen)? Is that not personal gratification and within their rights as a couple? What if the male/female in a relationship is sterile/infertile? What if both are incapable of having kids? Are they not allowed to be wed to one another? WTF is this guy talking about? "And of course, same sex marriage is against the natural law." Bruh, the concept of marriage itself is "against the natural law". Imagine being tied to someone for the rest of your life when you can just move on to the next person and plant your seed in them. Evolutionary biology dictates us to have as many partners as we can to increase our chances of passing our genes to the next generation. As a male, the META is impregnate as many woman as possible while if you are a female the most effective strategy is to hop on to the next dick to increase the chances of being pregnant. Speaking of "Natural Law", did you know that homosexuality is a natural occurring phenomenon? About 90% of Giraffe couples is between a big, dominant male and a smaller and younger male. Penguins, Walruses, and Seals are also seen engaging in same sex albeit in a very predatory and rapey kinda way. Gay lions are also a thing. Sometimes outcast male lions would form hunting groups with other outcasts male lions and would also do the deed with each other. Really gives a whole other meaning to "Gay Pride". I am done for today. Sa susunod na araw ko na tatapusin tong video na to Tito Pao. Naubos na braincells ko trying to make sense of this guys points and arguments.

[@rocatv5417]

Selfishness lang po yang Same sex Marriage..

[@svenkrules9855]

@@rocatv5417 so marriage out of selfishness is not allowed tulad ng sabi mo diba? then how come arranged marriages and child brides/husbands are allowed in other cultures?

[@rocatv5417]

@@svenkrules9855 hindi ko gets tanong mo, tagalogin mo nalang pilipino tayo eh

[@iyah5198]

@@rocatv5417 panong selfish? so ano yung marriage ng babae at lalaki, selfless?

[@theworld249]

@@iyah5198 hahahaha funny 69

[@yuriiixd]

The first argument is questionable. There are unions between opposite sexes na hindi makapagcreate ng tao, is he saying na invalid 'yung marriage na yon at nibreak pa rin ang natural law? Sa second argument ng opposition, yes, church and state should be separated, that's why we shouldn't create laws based on what the "bible" says. Moreover, no one says that they should be married under the supervision of church or priest. An attorney or city mayor can do the ceremony and acknowledge the union of the same sexes.

[@mackietenerife8274]

Sa totoo lang, ito na ang isa sa pinakagusto kong upload ni tito pao. Hindi lang siya pure comedic, kundi educational siya. Nakakatuwa lang na open si tito pao sa ganitong topic. Ginagamit niya yung pagiging youtuber niya to help everyone widen their opinions. Cheers tito pao. 🍻

[@BRYANLEECABATAY]

Open naman si tito pao sa lahat ng topic haha minsan lang e umiiwas lalo kung alam nyang maka cancel sya kaya babanat ng comedic line

[@RandomPureya]

Salamat sayo KUYA PAO dahil sayo pumasa ako sa debate namin dahil nagawa ko yung ginagawa mo na ginagalaw ang kamay pag may sinasabi nakakatanggal siya ng kaba para sakin salamat ulit KUYA PAO.

[@fortugalezacleomenesve.2376]

paanong ginagalaw ang kamay?

[@mista683]

Bigla ko tuloy namiss yung Johnny Antillon vid mo tito pao.

[@juanbeanz]

My answer to Rom rebuts about article 1 and 2 in Family Code is that... Our law itself is nakakabit sa bible. When they're making laws, they also look for the bible just to make it in the 2nd to 3rd readings, well in fact, RELIGION should separate from STATE (it is written on our law) but, we clearly see na law is always backing up with bible pa rin. Even our 1986 or 1987 constitution, naka-base pa rin sa bible. Hindi natin ramdam 'yong sinasabi na RELIGION is separate from STATE kasi napakarami pa ring mga rights ang nananatiling hindi kasama sa batas.

[@brillianceasarchavitasunto4193]

HAHAHAHA "Have you read books" 😭

[@user-gb6iz9ot1g]

Juan 3:16 Sapagkat gayon na lamang ang pag-ibig ng Diyos sa sangkatauhan, kaya't ibinigay niya ang kanyang kaisa-isang Anak, upang ang sinumang sumampalataya sa kanya ay hindi mapahamak, kundi magkaroon ng buhay na walang hanggan.

[@jimboymarino8105]

I love this content. Sana mas lumawak pa ang usapin tungkol dito.

[@Raborat]

Tama yan paolul. Be educated. Kung hindi naman tayo kabilang sa lgbt, bakit tayo mangingialam? Simple.

[@logamoga5171]

Tito Pao is really smart. He deserve to be a panelist in a debate

[@meljhonandrewsoriano6875]

31:15 hits different. Kaya minsan mahirap na sumabat sa usapan kapag ganyan sinasabi eh. Ikaw pa nagiging mali.

[@Ymyce]

Thank you tito pau! Andami kong natutunan. Yung "Respect my opinion" card grabe dami kong naalalang taong gumamit card na yan lalo na nung eleksyon lol HAHAHAAHHA if you want to respect your opinion get a better opinion ika nga nila.

[@RoldlordRold]

Grabe yung ending words tito pau, pero sadly may 31m parin na maytritrigger abt that, HAHAHAHAH

[@Renzkilla1093]

Pati 14 million.

[@Pspsps69496]

@@Renzkilla1093 Yay tinamaan

[@kikyojji]

@@Pspsps69496 bobo, halata naman yung pinapatamaan🤔🤣

[@eridianjinou739]

Aking take sa same sex marriage(sasabihin ko kahit wala kayong pake): Okay lang naman magpakasal by law, pero hindi mo pwedeng ipilit na magpakasal sa isang religion na ipinagbabawal ang same sex marriage.

[@pristinxx8324]

I think, most people are in contradiction for same-sex marriage because it's a godless action. Same as abortion, people conclude it as immoral, (which they've construct into their beliefs). And we have different perspective and practices over "morality" so how will we agree over such controversial topic if our definition for morality is different? Also, if you erase "religion" into such debate, it will be pointless. Because that's the integrity that that they're trying to uphold; which is one of the primary reasons why most Catholics and Christians are not in agreement. Point is, it's difficult to rationalize a rule. Why are people so obsessed with such topic? Why are Christians and Catholics against it? Why do the LGBTQIA+ wants it? Because of our different perspective on morality, there's a boundary or a line that makes us different in on a society. The opposition are against because being a God-centered man (ethical man) and being a Man-centered man (aesthetical man) is the bottom line. Whereas, the LGBTQIA+ society wants the same-sex marriage to be legalized because humans have free-will. We are not all obliged to follow other's beliefs. To conclude (kapoy sabot), whether same-sex marriage will be legalized, our beliefs should remain to ourselves. Be it being a Christian, or even being a part of LGBTQIA+.

[@vexxed2322]

kapoy hunahuna. ayaw ug pugsa

[@BFdEutschLaNd]

ang hirap naman magcomment nito dahil katoliko ako, i do not judge pero curious lang din ako, kung naniniwala ka na may diyos, bakit pilit mong bagohin ang ibinigay sayo ng nasa taas? Yun lang. Kung bading ka, hanap ka ng babae or tomboy. Mahirap ba talagang sumunod sa gusto nya? - sorry no offense sa makakabasa ng comment ko. May marami akong tomboy na kakilala pero kaopposite sex pa rin ang pinatulan nila. Why making 3rd sex kahit dalawa lang naman talaga ang gender, babae at lalake, kahit maging tomboy ka pa pero babae pa rin ang genitalia mo at kapag bading, may eggs pa rin which belong sa mga kalalakihan. Hindi ko magets. Huwag na sana tayong maconfuse and let us all accept kung ano tayo. For some, parang mas makapangyarihan pa sila kaysa nasa taas

[@remuelcortes5757]

For me, I think it's immorally wrong and disgusting for them to those against it that is why some people don't support it, and for those people who support it naman they don't see it that way

[@kizandere]

Well put sir, in addition, anything with human interaction are often subjective in nature, unless data presented, otherwise who are we truly to judge.

[@sisyphus9976]

@@BFdEutschLaNd naglagay ng "sorry no offense"* proceeds to talk about his/her indoctrinated belief na dalawa lang ang tunay na gender which is lalaki at babae kahit present sa paligid nya na may bading/tomboy/trans etc. "Hindi ko ma gets" bakit kailangan pakealaman ng isang tao ang kapwa tao sa nais nya iyutin at mahalin sa buhay?, isa kaba sa mga medieval Catholic faith soldier na naniniwalang ang cause ng cavities ay mga demonyo?. Napaka sarado ng isipan kala mo wala sa 21st century. Baka klosetang bading ka brad kaya ganyan ka mag isip(or may trauma sa mga bading/tomboy/lgtv led)

[@dogonzalesy8712]

kahit naman maisabatas sa congreso part legislative department kaya i interpret ng judicial department which is sa Supreme court so ibig sabihin naka depende pa rin sa supreme court yung final judgement sa batas kasi naka rely lang din sila sa batas

[@makisantos1654]

Parang may naalala ako biglang presidential candidate na nagsabing "resecpet my opinion"

[@johndelgado8536]

Miss ko na maging Membah... Join ako soon pag nakalabas na ako sa Hospital at gumaling na bali kong paa at kamay Boss Pao...

[@TeaDrinker-eq3md]

"You can't turn a moral wrong into a civil right." I saw someone (credits to them for their wonderful analogy) comment about a particular law which allows people to kill their spouses if they caught them in an act of cheating (specifically during the act of cantonan alam niyo na kung ano yan). It is also legal under the law to kill the person cheating with your spouse. Now if we examine the situation, is it really morally right to kill someone? Is taking a life an adequate or fair toll for cheating? Evidently, the person from the video's quotation is very erroneous and is generally not applicable. Hope the next administration legislate same sex union. As a closeted bisexual guy, I'd love to see more acceptance to the LGBTQ+ community especially in our society. It's still breaks my heart that there are still people out there who ridicules and malign other people for having a different sexual preference than what is deemed to be "normal". There is nothing abnormal about loving a person. Romantic love should not be confined by the definition that only a man and a woman can experience.

[@midnightgames8912]

Aside from it being progressive, I agree on same sex marriage/civil unions because of the benefits that the couple will receive. As of right now, the family code only recognizes marriage between a male and a female. Because of this, all the provisions in the family code, like conjugal properties, unions/marriages, do not cover the LGBTQIA+ community. So, if same-sex couples have acquired properties over the years, they could not establish property arrangements since no law can cover it. the law regarding co-ownership can resolve that, but I think the provisions provided by the family code will bring more protection for the said couple.

[@thomaszulueta4735]

I agree on same sex marriage because marriages can be platonic too and it doesn't matter if both parties have the same sex because I personally believe you can marry anyone as long as both likes/loves each other and both parties agree to do so even with the same sex.

[@kenethdaviesmagnaye6911]

One of the most healthy comment section sa KZbin! Sana magkaron pa ng madaming content na ganito otits Pao!

[@abigailjean7375]

Too early for this comment hahahaha

[@mysteriouschicken4727]

kakabreak ko lang sa work at saktong sakto ka naman tito Pao hahaha

[@larsvlogtv]

Watching this while I'm facing a stressful day, Thank you tito pao for making my day less stressful

[@nolipeneradaraman9739]

Dagdag ko lang po sa sinabi ni Sir Pau. Maaari pa rin namang makipag-diskusyon ng may respeto sa opinyon kung bukas ang ating isipan at ang magiging sentro ng diskusyon ay ang pagbabahagi ng kaalaman at hindi naka-focus sa personal na nararamdaman. Bagamat walang kasiguruhang walang masasaktan ngunit kung ang magkabilang panig ay bukas ang isipan ay parehas silang may matututunan at pawang mapag-iisipan nang maayos ang paksang pinag-uusapan. Higit sa lahat, parehas po silang matututong tumungin sa ibang pananaw. Ayun lang po. Nakakatuwa pong manood ng inyong videos sir. More power po😊😊😊.

[@dennispilar7984]

More on debate content kuya pao..nadadagdagan sustansya ng utak ko😂😂😂😂

[@jfsygijc5587]

Dapat Graduate na ren ako todayy huhu kaso nag choose ako na magwork muna kase in need. Congrats to all Graduates!! with honors or wala! Congraatss 💕✨ Thanks sa new upload tito pao

[@What-the-fact01]

Wag kang mag alala balang araw ga-graduate ka din tiwala lang at tatag

[@jaybee9213]

Sa akin ok lang ang same sex marriage pero under the law. Kasi may ibang tao na ipinipilit na ikasal sa church. Kahit pagbalik baliktarin and mundo hindi talaga makiki ayon ang religion beliefs sa same sex marriage. You can marry anyone one you want without any kind of approval of anyone or any organization as long as both of you are happy. Sa mga lgbtq na kapatid stay strong basta mahalaga sumaya kayo hindi niyo kailangan ng pagkilala ng religions basta isa kang mabuting tao. ☺️

[@earlfrancisphilipamoy9268]

Imagine Paulol is your Filipino teacher 😩❤️

[@asinnnn2797]

kanina pa na naman nakita ko sa fb feed ko yung balitang ina ng bubbl gum, naalala ko lang bigla yung mga commentating vid noong 2019 dati ni paolul which is the reason bat ko rin sya pinapanood and nagkataon may new vid. I wish sana ganito yung pinapanood ng mga matatanda ngayun kasi pansin ko dahil sa kahiligan ko sa memes parang may nabubuksan pa yung interest ko sa mga ganitong usapin.

[@andrejgatchalian3063]

Madaming fallacies, hindi gaanong controlled ang debate, pero kung titignan mas maganda kung kaya makipagdiskusyon ng bawat tao sa ganitong lebel na hindi sa tagapagsalita nababaling ang argumento kung hindi sa mga isyu o paksa lang na pinaguusapan. Sana mamulat sa ganitong diskurso ang mga kabataan. Maging bukas ang isip at hindi balat sibuyas na 'pag tinamaan o may salungat sa opinyon o paniniwala, e magsasabi na lang ng mga walang kwentang argumento sabay patama sa mismong kadiskurso nito. Sana sa mga susunod na ganyang programa, mayroon na silang tamang pag lalaan ng oras sa bawat partido pati na rin kung maaari e mapatayan ng mikropono ang panig na hindi pa dapat mag salita upang hindi masapawan at makapaglatag ng magandang argumento ang bawat panig sa kani kanilang oras ng paglalatag ng mga punto.

[@stephenloydg.delleva4983]

POV: Gusto mo maging prof si Paulol

[@agentofchaoslorddwightschr8544]

a mind opening debate, love it

[@wakuwaku9920]

Basta isa lang ang masasabi ko "love has no gender"

[@fantasyalover4782]

Mas gusto ko yan kesa sa "Love is love" kasi not all kinds of romantic love are justifiable or moral.

[@dieforme6685]

Syempre walang gender Ang love bakit Tao ba yan haha

[@vilshin1575]

@@dieforme6685 support ka ba sa lgbt?

[@dieforme6685]

@@vilshin1575 Maybe but I do not hate LGBTQ just be free of what they doin

[@seaman4366]

be ye not unequally yoked... yan ang sabi kapag marriage hindi para sa gusto lang magpakasal or dahil feel lang nila at considered marriage lang yan kung lalaki at babae

[@philipmuleta4165]

Ang panalo sa debating ito si Tito Pao. Kasi daming ads na lumabas.

[@elvs0530]

"Ang definition ng babae ay ang pagkakaroon ng vagina at kakayanang magka-produce ng bata..."

[@humorm4152]

I can respect your opinions and disagree with it at the same time. People can actually work together even though we don't support each other's personal beliefs.

[@kinskins1538]

Respect is earned not given, if you have a shitty opinion people have all the rights to mock it. If the only way you can defend your views is by saying "respect my opinion" then you probably have a shitty one in the first place.

[@humorm4152]

@@kinskins1538 Using the same principle, I choose to "give respect first" so I can "earn it back". I don't need to mock you to prove the truth and sometimes what makes people believe you is not the data or the hard facts about it but the actions shown by the individual. The goal is to convince them not just disapprove someone.

[@kinskins1538]

@@humorm4152 I rather be right and disrespected than be respected for my shitty beliefs. There are people who don't see anything wrong with having relationship with a minor, do you respect those people's opinions as well? You shouldn't default to respecting someone's opinion especially if they couldn't even defend that said opinion.

[@AngryKittens]

31:18 "Walang kwenta ang 'respect my opinion.' Ang opinion ay dapat sinasaktan."

[@AngryKittens]

@@humorm4152 In the case of opposing same sex marriage, are you really giving "respect" when you're actively preventing it from happening in the first place? People who say "respect my opinion" in a debate, aren't really hoping for mutual respect. What you are actually saying is "Let's keep the status quo which is what I actually wanted. F your opinion and f your facts."

[@kanserpoako1223]

Ayoko munang mag-isip ng mga negative thoughts pero gusto kong I share ko na masaya akong nag moving up ngayon with honors! At masaya akong nag update ka! 🥳✨

[@johnpaulsenriquez7688]

Paalala; 13 Ito ang wakas ng bagay; lahat ay narinig. Matakot ka sa Diyos, at sundin mo ang kanyang mga utos; sapagkat ito ang buong katungkulan ng tao. 14 Sapagkat dadalhin ng Diyos ang bawat gawa sa paghuhukom, pati ang bawat lihim na bagay, maging ito'y mabuti o masama. ECLESIASTES 12:13-14

[@mvlogsdaily4573]

Yung sinasabing insignificant marriage, nawawala yung essence ng marriage kung ang isang pamilya ay hindi magkakaanak, may mga magaasawa na naghihiwalay dahil hindi sila magkaanak. Dahil habang tumagal, yung spark nawawala, yung kilig nawawala din. Pero kung sila ay magkakaanak, uusbong ang marriage at love sa isang family na parang buto. 😊😊😊

[@laurenceprincipe2436]

Agree with same sex union to protect the right of each party. Example may napundar na silang assets then suddenly nag hiwalay. At marami pa kaya dapat maaral itong mabuti ng ating mga mambabatas.

[@saggieyt]

The only reason why same sex marriage isn't already a thing is because the lgbt is because some people (not all) still have a closed mindset about the topic. Although we do have people that ARE open minded, but due to their beliefs they refuse the idea. Personally I do support same sex marriage, its a great way for people who love each other to have a union in a different way. Not only that, the benefits from being married will also help the minority which is the lgbt. Would appreciate other thoughts on this!

[@scoutbaudelaire7873]

Close minded term mo sa hindi accepted or supportive ang same sex marriage and open minded sa accepted or suppprtive. Baliktarin natin, ikaw yung close minded at open minded naman ang hindi gusto sa same sex marriage. Ok ba sa iyo?

[@saggieyt]

@@scoutbaudelaire7873 good point, pero karamihan kasi ng taong nakikita kong di sangayon ganon eh. I do get mahirap tanggapin yung mga bagay na ayaw mo. My point is, one factor lang yung sinasabi ko. Thank you for the criticism

[@idiosyncrasy7703]

Imho, my main concern is how the norm will change. Children go through a very fragile and impressionable part of their lives. Now, wala sanang issue generally. But the concern comes up when transitioning or sex change comes into play. It's not unheard of, documented pa nga even, na may mga taong ni-regret yung process. Years after transitioning they only realize who they really were. What's their reason for wanting to transition in the first place? I don't know. Why did they change their minds? I don't know either. I'm just concerned that by legalizing same sex marriage, same sex relationships will become more of a norm, that may lead to more of the young being put in the same situation. Of course it all boils down to parenting din naman. How well you supervise and inform your kids about such things. But it adds another layer of concern. Parenting is as hard as it is, imagine trying to provide guidance to your kids about such a complex topic without shifting their views too far to one side risking them to make harsh decisions that they may regret. One could argue din na it would be easier if parents have time to do their job at home in raising kids, but we all know most families need to have both parents working in order to provide at least 3 meals a day. So then systematic poverty comes to play naman. Walang time ang parents to be parents at home. It's just a bunch of prior issues na di pa natin naayos dito sa pilipinas, that may affect how well drastic changes can be implemented into the culture. US has a bit of a luxury because they're honestly way better off than us, generally speaking. My main point I guess is that, there's nothing wrong with legalizing same sex marriage. It's just that we, as a country, aren't ready yet. It may take time, but we need to iron out things first. And tbh poverty is the main most pressing concern. If only people can live life without worrying what to eat tomorrow, maybe we as a community will have more time to be educated. Less ignorant people, more open minded citizens. Change will be easier to apply.

[@saggieyt]

@@idiosyncrasy7703 that's a really nice take. I agree with everything, everything pretty much boils down to little mistakes adding up. Being a parent if it is legalized WILL be so much harder. Tapos may poverty into play pa? Our country really isn't ready for these kinds of stuff

[@idiosyncrasy7703]

@@saggieyt kaya nga I honestly think we should approach this systematically. Ayusin muna yung pressing and glaring issues. I'm not saying na hindi importante yung rights and opportunities ng mga kababayan nating lgbt, but when more than half the country is living on one canned good a day, mahirap mainform yung public about the importance of such complex issues. Mas madaling mag pasa ng change if majority of the population is informed enough and has an open mind about it. Mas madali mo ma-eenforce and people would be more adaptive.

[@hakdog4299]

I think the government should provide everyone equal opportunities even in their preferred life partners. The catholic church will never accept it, but the government should provide the option to those who want to be married under our state.

[@rainb5987]

This is my opinion about same-sex marriage: 1. IT IS CONSTITUTIONAL Article 15 of the 1987 Constitution never restricts marriage on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity. The reason why the framers didn't put "a man and a woman" is that it would make Presidential Decree 1083 or Muslim Code of The Philippines unconstitutional as it permits polygamous marriage (one man and many women) to Muslim Filipinos. If the Constitution is silent about the issue, Congress has discretion on what kind of enabling law to make it more effective, define it, and set its scope and other terms as they see fit. But it doesn't stop any people from challenging its constitutionality in court. 2. THE FAMILY CODE IS PRESUMED CONSTITUTIONAL UNTIL PROVEN UNCONSTITUTIONAL Although the 1987 Constitution is silent about gender, it doesn't stop Congress to define, limit and making a law about it. Hence, we can say Family Code is a valid exercise of discretion on the part of Congress. But there is a rule in Supreme Court that the law is PRESUMED constitutional unless the party challenging it presents substantial evidence and arguments that it is in fact unconstitutional. Sadly, there is no proper party with a proper case yet has filed any petition challenging the constitutionality of the family code. 3. HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT IS LEGAL IN THE PHILIPPINES. I heard someone say, "you cannot make legal right what is morally wrong." That statement cannot be used against LGBT people, at least in the legal aspect. The Supreme Court ruled already that: "The morality in law is PUBLIC and SECULAR not religious." "The Philippines has NEVER seen fit to CRIMINALIZE HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT under PUBLIC MORALITY." "LGBTs and their supporters, in all likelihood, believe with equal fervor that relationships between individuals of the same sex are morally equivalent to heterosexual relationships. They, too, are entitled to hold and express that view. However, as far as this Court is concerned, our democracy precludes using the religious or moral views of one part of the community to exclude from consideration the values of other members of the community." -Ang Ladlad LGBT v. COMELEC. GR # 190582

[@SolitaryStudiosOfficial]

Eto yata pinaka mahabang video ni tito pao about memes ah.