thank you for being a real chemistry teacher, now i'm not confused
@Edusetucbsespeedmaths4 жыл бұрын
Every Topic is equally easy when concepts gets cleared.
@rinyeongi63222 жыл бұрын
@@Edusetucbsespeedmaths but school system doesn't understand that :/
@calanonash2 жыл бұрын
In 7 videos of under 5 minutes each I managed to understand chemistry better than I did in 7 years of school. Thanks, Dave.
@darrenmeyers52713 жыл бұрын
This teacher is brilliant, well organized and articulate! Lessons are concise and direct. Thank you Professor Dave!
@RayaanDanish3 ай бұрын
fr
@psychologycontact99216 жыл бұрын
My first time here. I am loving your channel like maaaaad! Thank you so much you real human angel.
@idealthinker1015 жыл бұрын
I wished that my school teachers also taught me this way !
@hanumavattem31063 жыл бұрын
I wanna meet you and thank you for all of your videos with each and every atom in my body..
@oregonvulture7 ай бұрын
Holy shite, I got my associates degree 10 years ago but I failed introductory CHEM. I'm going back for a transfer degree in fall so I'm preparing for preparatory CHEM and MTH. I never understood balancing equations but I just did all of the practice questions right. Thank you, Professor Dave 😭😭
@sharmaineizar62763 жыл бұрын
I'm glad I found you! you explained it god damn well. I felt so dumb in my Chemistry class before, but now I get it thanks to you!
@josephfarace6633 Жыл бұрын
i have a exam in 2 days and i just wanted to say you taught me like everything in the world and i love you so much like bro words cannot explain how happy i am right now like i feel like a whole new person the knowledge i just gained is unmatched your literally a genius
@kayk26312 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I missed two days of school and this helped me catch up in 4 minutes! You're a really great teacher!
@jamesbas52097 жыл бұрын
I haven't looked at the comprehension answers just yet because I want to workout the questions on my own before checking if I am right or wrong. My question lies with #2 AgF + CaCl sub 2 -------> AgCl + CaF sub 2 When balancing this equation, why does F fall off of Ag and become a part of Ca with two atoms?
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
to understand this we must understand ionic bonds and ionic solids! this will all be revealed as you move forward, in the tutorials about the chemical bond, intermolecular forces, solutions, etc.
@johnmayes96493 жыл бұрын
The reason F falls off of Ag and becomes part of Ca is because F is more attracted to Ca than Ag. The Ca, which is Calcium, has two electrons that it gives to F. The only problem is, F would love to accept one electron from Ca but not two. The solution? F goes and gets another F to join him and the two F's each keep one electron from Ca. They now become a team of three: One Ca and two F's. This is what happens in chemical reactions, they change partners.
@bait52573 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains how can we do the comprehension no. 4?
@gdaymates4312 жыл бұрын
@@johnmayes9649 they sound like swingers. Haha
@ryderb.8453 жыл бұрын
This is the only channel that doesn't feel like it just gives me a half-assed explanation, it only gives me information overload
@julenecoetzee87486 ай бұрын
thank you so much!!! I had literally no idea what a balanced chemical equation was or how to do it and its really important cuz I am in grade 10
@liquidtompls56665 жыл бұрын
Thanks dude, I have a bad science teacher, now finding this I am finally getting it!
@gamergirlnatalia67153 жыл бұрын
Thank you chemistry Jesus lol
@Claudius_Ptolemy2 жыл бұрын
I finally understand how these equations work, thank you very much for this lesson Professor! :)
@ShutterbugVideo6712 ай бұрын
Your explanations make a lot more sense than my chemistry classes did in high school or in college!!
@mememe74958 жыл бұрын
Your videos are so helpful! Thank you!!
@jamesciava052 жыл бұрын
thank you Jesus
@ethangoggin98747 жыл бұрын
fuck I'm an idiot holy fuck
@patatatatatata3 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave thanks for the video! However, what about equations that have ions as reactives or products, how do we balance the electrical charges.
@ProfessorDaveExplains3 жыл бұрын
check out my tutorial on balancing redox reactions
@patatatatatata3 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains thank u so much Professor 🖤
@RapidBlindfolds5 ай бұрын
the way the coefficients were written differently at 1:11 confused me, with one of them in front in normal text and the other behind in subscript, but now i understand its because 2Na represents 2 sodium atoms hanging out, whereas 2 chlorine atoms come together to create a covalent bond.
@deadpiratetattoo20156 ай бұрын
I might be a nerd, but balanced equations and dipole moments, angstrums and the like was my favorite. But, I also like the old style chemistry names and stuff.
@Parfaitt4014 жыл бұрын
u dropped ur crown king
@3runjosh6 ай бұрын
I thought I was just a stupid person with a failed brain and maybe I was but in 2 minutes I was able to learn how to do this and get them all correct except number 4. Thank you, there is hope for me. Back in 2002 when I was 13/14 years old I just couldn't understand this.
@jhelseaamarixe44754 жыл бұрын
Hi. I find #4 in comprehension confusing. Is there a trick for that?
@devikagopakumar89063 жыл бұрын
Did you get it? Hope you did but I am showing you anyways(there is no trick btw) H3PO4 + KOH ----> K3PO4 + H2O H - 4 | H - 2 P - 1 | P - 1 O - 5 | O - 5 K - 1 | K - 3 ( have this in your mind or jot it down , you don't have to correct anything in the main equation yet, first we are gonna figure out the numbers to be written in the eqn.) 1. H first. Not balanced. 2. Then P . Its 1 on both sides. Balanced. 3. O. Okay.... 4. Finally K . It is 3 on the product side. We have to make the reactant side also 3. There is only one way. We write 3 on the reactant side. ( KOH changes to 3KOH) Current eqn : H3PO4 + 3KOH -----> K3PO4 + 3H2O 5. Okay..now return to H. (See the current eqn)We've got total six H in the reactant side( Three H of H3PO4 and 3KOH) And also six H in the product side..... 3H2O (3×2) H balanced:)) 6. Now we have O. There are seven O in the reactant side ( four in H3PO4 and three in 3KOH .. 4+3). And also seven in product side.( four in K3PO4 and 3 in 3H2O....4+3) O is balanced. [ Just like that . You don't have to write the figures at first, estimate them and keep looking ] Therefore balanced eqn:)) #4)H3PO4 + KOH ----> K3PO4 + H2O H3PO4 + 3KOH -----> K3PO4 + 3H2O
@-_wkwyy2 жыл бұрын
@@devikagopakumar8906 Thank you man
@devikagopakumar89062 жыл бұрын
@@-_wkwyy You're welcome bro...
@12bucklemysh0e3 жыл бұрын
no one: me, dancing to the music at 3:29: 💃💃
@shashwatsrivastava53487 жыл бұрын
I just love ur videos professor
@stackattack74 жыл бұрын
C3H8 + O2->3CO2 + 4H20 dealing with oxygen there will be 2 on the left and (3×2=6 + 4×2=8 so 14 not 10) or am i missing something because when you said 4×1 i was confused where you got the 1?
@stackattack74 жыл бұрын
Nevermind...... i realized i was looking at hydrogen not oxygen haha
@thaddeusgroup36552 жыл бұрын
Wow! professor Dave, you are a life saver. I understand balancing equation for the first time in my life. God bless you.
@DemonCici2 жыл бұрын
HE TAUGHT IT IN 3 MINS!?!?!? dude this took like 2 weeks in high school... thank you so much!
@FrancesObeleEbubechukwu-yz7poАй бұрын
Thanks soo much professor Dave🥰🥰 I cannot believe that I can now solve and understand Balancing Equation Thanks you soo much,am forever grateful God bless you 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@eelio84693 жыл бұрын
...I don’t get it. How do you expect us to know what you just unbalanced if your not going to immediately check on it? I need to do that or I’m going to forget. If I unbalance something I will immediately fix it idk what I’m doing wrong
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
I recommend a linear algebra approach. Assign a variable as the coefficient of each molecule. Go in alphabetical order, and use lowercase letters. Set up a system of linear equations to equate the population of each element's atoms on both sides of the equation, and solve by your algebraic method of choice. Assume the first coefficient a=1, so that your number of equations matches your number of unknowns. From time to time, you will get fractional coefficients with the above method. This is not acceptable as an answer in Chemistry, because you can't react a fraction of a molecule. Therefore, you then have to multiply through to clear all the fraction denominators. Find the least common multiple of all the fraction denominators, and multiply through by that number. You will then have the smallest possible group of whole number coefficients that balance the chemical equation.
@fabriziom26616 жыл бұрын
What would be the best way to balance longer chemical equations? Is it just seeing the needed number with more practice?
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
yes i think just repetition! you start to get an intuition for which element to balance first and what not. also check for polyatomic ions, those can be balanced as a whole, without having to split them up into elements.
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
I recommend up setting up a system of linear equations to do it. Assign a lowercase letter as a placeholder for each coefficient, and go in alphabetical order for each molecule you have. Tally up the number of atoms for each elemental species, in terms of your coefficients. Assume the first coefficient a=1. Then solve the system of linear equations, just like it were a math problem. Matrices can help when you have numerous equations. It is likely that you will get fractional coefficients, and when you do, this just means you need to multiply a by the least common multiple of all the denominators, so that every coefficient becomes an integer. For instance, given the burning of Isopropyl alcohol: C3H8O + O2 -> CO2 + H2O Assign lowercase letters as coefficients: a C3H8O + b O2 -> c CO2 + d H2O Equate counts of each elemental species on each side: Carbon: 3*a = c Hydrogen: 8*a = 2*d Oxygen: a + 2*b = 2*c + d Assume a = 1 Solve for our unknowns: a=1 b=9/2 c=3 d=4 Because we got a fractional result for b, i.e. 9/2, we have to multiply all of the above numbers by 2, to make them all whole numbers. Our balanced equation becomes: 2 C3H8O + 2 O2 -> 6 CO2 + 8 H2O
@tlhe_ovIyloS7 ай бұрын
In case you don’t know, CxHy+(x+y/4)O2=xCO2+(y/2)H2O
@lakishaberry72502 жыл бұрын
Thank you professor Dave! You are the best teacher for everything.
@redness4815 Жыл бұрын
My chemistry professor made this sound so confusing. I completely understand the concept thanks to you!
@KanoBoom3 жыл бұрын
0:50 Correction: NaCl is a ionic 'compound', not a molecule
@ahmedshamree677 Жыл бұрын
Prof What about the hydrogen produced by OH- and H+
@euphoria_iq5 ай бұрын
can someone exlpain number 4 of the end checking comprehension questions bc i do not understand that one
@cozypunk26135 жыл бұрын
i'm love u,saved mi life
@kelman91924 жыл бұрын
truly sent from heaven
@gabrielmcpherson57564 жыл бұрын
Professor I still don't understand. Can you please explain more in depth
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
You cannot create or destroy atoms, by ordinary chemical means. You also cannot change the elemental species of any given atom. What we do is tally up each element's atom on each side of the chemical equation, and apply coefficients to the front of each chemical formula, indicating that we need at least that many of that molecule, in order to get a full reaction. Consider the burning of octane gasoline in oxygen. C8H18 + O2 => CO2 + H2O We apply placeholder letters as coefficients to each formula: a C8H18 + b O2 => c CO2 + d H2O Set up a system of equations to solve for a, b, c, and d. Assume a to equal 1. We'll scale up the coefficients if we get fractional values. Carbon: 8*a = c Hydrogen: 18*a = 2*d Oxygen: 2*b = 2*c + d Set a=1, and solve for b, c, and d: b=12.5 c=8 d=9 Since we end up with a fractional value for b, this means we need to set a=2, and double each of the remaining coefficients. All the coefficients need to end up as a whole number, so it has a real life significance, since you can't react half of a molecule. a = 2 b = 25 c = 16 d = 18 This means our balanced equation is: 2 C8H18 + 25 O2 => 16 CO2 + 18 H2O In English, this would be read aloud as: "Two molecules of octane react with 25 molecules of oxygen gas. The reaction yields 16 molecules of carbon dioxide and 18 molecules of water vapor."
@gabrielmcpherson57562 жыл бұрын
@@carultch thanks it is s much clearer now.
@cinammonrollss4 жыл бұрын
Short videos and meaningful loved them
@bogboyz Жыл бұрын
idk if you still answer questions on these but how come in the last example you only used the coefficient of water molecules (the 4 in 4H2O) and multiplied by 1, when you used the coefficient and exponent for carbon dioxide (3•2)??
@HyperTheKappa Жыл бұрын
Not to be a nerd but balancing equations was some of the most fun I had in school
@lochanshivaram6079 Жыл бұрын
How do you even approach the 4th problem?
@Calviinx9 ай бұрын
Science is traumazing
@ZallyAimro4 күн бұрын
No, it's beautiful
@Juandraym12 ай бұрын
I think I've figured out my problem. What is the meaning/purpose behind this balancing? In regular math you have an equation you figure its sum at the end; or you're solving for a specific variable. What the hell am I doing this "BALANCING" for?
@ProfessorDaveExplains2 ай бұрын
conservation of matter
@0hajar5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for every think 💛 really you are great teacher...
@OfentseKhoza-vp9goАй бұрын
Thanks now I can balance chemical equations
@emily-le6tv6 жыл бұрын
Explains sooo much better than mrs charlesworth. Are you a teacher at school?
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
not anymore, focusing on science communication!
@rochelroma1804 жыл бұрын
thank you po! 😊😊❤️
@triple_gem_shining11 ай бұрын
balancing chem equations is fun! neat littlte puzzle
@Rico-Suave_4 жыл бұрын
luv your videos, you did a great job of organizing the topics, had a question, I never understood why does burning(fire) only involve oxygen and not nitrogen which is also in the air ? I guess I don't understand fire
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
The triple bond of nitrogen is a lot more energy intensive to break, that most of the nitrogen gas in the air is just a spectator gas to the fire. There is about as much nitrogen in the exhaust as there is in the original air. Some of it is consumed to make unintended products of combustion like NO and NO2, but most of it remains in its original compound of elemental nitrogen N2. The nitrogen gas might as well be an inert gas, for most chemical reactions.
@jamesbas52097 жыл бұрын
Nevermind. That's the chemical reaction, right? I'm just not fully understanding how to balance these equations. I'm going to keep replaying the video.
@codieanneedwards3 жыл бұрын
Yes I keep replaying too, and I’m still confused
@angelicamaymartinez9903 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this! I easily understand our lesson now
@oliverlopez42367 жыл бұрын
Why when balancing some polyatomic ions, they disassemble ?
@ProfessorDaveExplains7 жыл бұрын
not sure what you mean!
@gamerdonuts56337 ай бұрын
what is going on i need therpy plz help me
@undefined8882 жыл бұрын
Can you call sodium chloride a molecule? Im confused - thought they were ionic bonds
@setonix91512 жыл бұрын
Uhm is this a joke or your actually wondering. I'm uncertain because of your profile picture.
@setonix91512 жыл бұрын
I'm assuming you should already know because of your profile picture, but to still answer the question : no. I wouldn't call NaCl a molecule.
@undefined8882 жыл бұрын
@@setonix9151 sodium chloride is not a molecule, It is an ionic crystal. We write it as NaCl because they bond together 1:1. I am pretty sure that this video is wrong about that.
@undefined8882 жыл бұрын
@@setonix9151 it is a joke lol
@setonix91512 жыл бұрын
@@undefined888 i did just say I wouldn't call it a molecule Edit : and I used NaCl because I'm lazy
@pljeskavica13 Жыл бұрын
well thanks dave
@atoz43993 жыл бұрын
This is a great channel.
@vamp54174 жыл бұрын
Thx for the help man 😇
@hanzsintim2 жыл бұрын
This is so easy when you explained it
@josefonseca67722 жыл бұрын
Thank you chemistry jesus
@borttorbbq25562 жыл бұрын
Immediately to something I have no idea magnificent
@borttorbbq25562 жыл бұрын
Okay scratch that I am familiar with it. But still better understanding is better regardless
@amukelanimoema51174 ай бұрын
thank you professor Dave u saved me thank u thank u thank u ❤❤❤❤❤❤
@TYD202 жыл бұрын
Thanks Professor Dave
@genevieveschmitt63044 жыл бұрын
hey shorty how old are you?
@Yasumui9 ай бұрын
15
@sidepocketjonas7 ай бұрын
162
@cbmobile17976 ай бұрын
95,587 hailed from the Mesopotamia lands
@organic_angel8 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@kiancanale3449 Жыл бұрын
Thank you, Sir Dave!
@genevieveschmitt63044 жыл бұрын
one more button please
@Jnrlionndogg4 жыл бұрын
it kinda looks like he is reading off of something lol but he is great
@Sorrytosay7926 жыл бұрын
that's good explaination
@thesandwich71512 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much professor Dave.
@amani59533 жыл бұрын
your explanation is amazing وفالعربي يجنننن مرهه
@scottflix64665 жыл бұрын
Thanks Sir
@TonyWoodstock-bz6gl9 ай бұрын
THANKS!!
@venkateshp.52324 жыл бұрын
Hey thanks buddy!
@thelastdemonicwolf79894 жыл бұрын
thanks, Dave
@sandramichelsen63154 жыл бұрын
THANKS. GREAT EXPLANATION. I LOVE IT
@user-vs5cq2xf9k11 ай бұрын
Thanks professor dave🎉
@goose66666 Жыл бұрын
i love you so much you're a life saver
@jrposadas27535 жыл бұрын
what does the song at the start of the video say?
@ProfessorDaveExplains5 жыл бұрын
"He knows a lot about the science stuff, Professor Dave explains!"
@Jnrlionndogg4 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains he realy does reply
@Jnrlionndogg4 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains that means he is a true teacher
@ahyeah7943 Жыл бұрын
I SOOOOOOO LOVEEEEEE YOUUUU PROFESSOR DAVEEEEE... EXPLAINS ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@ellaaaaa34532 жыл бұрын
Thanks man. Very helpful! 👍
@lemn93654 жыл бұрын
Perhaps you should show a method to solving this, just talking about it doesn't make it very clear
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
You mean the method that I totally do show in this video?
@lemn93654 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains I mean like which elements you should do first not "lets do carbon first"
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
Elements present in elemental form are done last. Otherwise, just pick one and go. It's very straightforward.
@veryhealthy9962 Жыл бұрын
Ooff..I took a full on 45 mins to understand this. (I am however, not learning from school and using P.Dave entirely to self learn supplemented with physical textbook
@adityashankar52675 жыл бұрын
Wow...now i can understand this topic
@daviddaman388 ай бұрын
this is a big w
@toro_maine65992 жыл бұрын
I love you Dave
@minsuga10153 жыл бұрын
Omg thank you soo much may Allah bless you 💜💜
@gnation8552 жыл бұрын
Thanks teacher
@sambhavpathak4733 ай бұрын
Aacha padhate ho sir sabash
@Omgitsover15526 жыл бұрын
"Next, lets do hydrogen. Theres 8 on the left, and 2 on the right. That means we will make 4 waters." I'm obviously missing something. I have no idea where the 4 comes from or how it got there. This idea seems conceptual and i just cant see it.
@Omgitsover15526 жыл бұрын
Took me several times and videos to get this, but it makes sense to me now, thanks.