Background Modeling Trick in Revit Tutorial

[@pmackni]

Really neat trick! I will say, instead of just rotating the walls (since you'll have to do that for each perspective), I would recommend adjusting the width of the image to a whole factor of the Wall's inner surface circumference. So a 1500cm radius o.c. wall that's 10cm thick would give us an inner radius of 1495. 2πr with r=1495 gives us a circumference of ~9393.36, just a little more than 3 times your 3000 width of the image. 9393.36/3 gives us a better tile length of 3131.12. this will avoid that unseemly seam you had to rotate out of the way by making the tile almost perfectly (just within a millimeter or so) at the beginning/end point of the circular wall. This way renders can be taken multiple times during the duration of the project without having to remember to alter the location of the seam.

[@المقداديعقوب-د5ج]

Finally..... Anther tutorial from balkan 💙💙💙

[@mohammadhafeez1554]

Realy Realy 👌 tutorial...thank you

[@clarkkc11]

This is a great alternative method!

[@sujithpayyanur9624]

Thank you 😇

[@pascastro9928]

That´s one creative tutorial!

[@kabir10]

Thanks for lot of excellent vedio.Thanks for your nice presentation.why the default data calculation for pile cap volume and areas are not same as actual calculation.and whye cc length data not shown in schedule.what should be solution.

[@ΠΕΝΥΚΑΜΠΑΚΗ]

this is very clever! I'm wondering whether it would work with a cityscape...

[@pmackni]

This should work with any tile-able image, or any image that is wide enough to "hide" any repeating appearance.

[@sanyamjain929]

What was the purpose of adding the cutout image i.e the mask layer ? Please do explain

[@rivermorey3956]

yes im wondering this also

[@sahanurrahmansahan7846]

How to make or load, rest shade or little umbrella. Please help me.

[@pieceoftrashkeith]

Welcome back lol

[@olik136]

Just from watching this I noticed that the material browser is way slower for me despite having a pretty strong PC- is this a known thing? Can I do something about that?

[@yanreis12]

this is about how fast your storage unit is. HD is much slower than a SSD

[@pmackni]

I would recommend never running Revit on an HDD. If you're one your own, I'd swap it out to an SSD. If you have an IT department, tell them to always put an SSD in any Revit workstation. Period. If you want to get fancy, you could shoot for an M.2 form factor SSD, it uses a faster connector than a standard SSD (won't go into tech jargon of why right now) and further improves speed, but shouldn't be quite as noticeable of a jump. Might also look at the RAM. The min. reqs. For Revit recommend 8GB, and that's what IT likes to go with (again, if you have an IT that builds/specs your computers), but that will only get you laughable performance at best. Autodesk's performance recommendation for RAM (32GB) is reasonable if you want to have any kind of decent workflow. For a modelling machine, I personally would never go lower than 32GB.

[@yanreis12]

i have to be honest.. that is not a great result. much better workflow and result if you use any other program to do this background

[@karas_richard]

That’s true. But if you are limited with softwares, it can be also useable. But I know that better result will be in separated rendering software. I think that he just want to show that Revit can be possible good for background without modeling other stuff.

[@iamphyize]

Third to COMMENT