Ballistics Gel Test: Are 6.5mm cartridges sufficient for big game?

[@bluepunk182]

I know it's a completely anecdotal, but I shot a fairly small/medium sized deer at about 15 yards with a 12 gauge slug. He ran about 50-70 yards and then collapsed. When my dad and I were field dressing him (my first deer at 12), he did not have a heart and most of his lungs were blown up. It's pretty amazing what an animal can do on addrenaline alone.

[@clint_a_210]

That's one of the most impressive stories I've heard in a while!

[@JTTTTT850]

Probably didn’t have an exit wound though

[@bluepunk182]

@@JTTTTT850 I don't think it did. I think the rib on the other side was cracked, but no exit.

[@bkb5668]

7mm mag. May have only penetrated 1/4" more, but on game it thumps harder than all the other cartriges mentioned by a big margin. I have a .300 rcm which is the parent case to the 6.5 prc and it is a nice cartridge for all game in the lower 48.

[@jmkhenka]

DRT requires a hit/distruption in the central nervous system. If both lungs and heart is penetrated all that is keeping the animal alive is the oxygen in the muscles and brain. After that its dead. But It can run far... Or mechanical damage, shoot the shoulders and it cant move the legs etc etc.

[@ChristopherKnN]

From what I've understood, sectional density and bullet construction are the biggest factors in penetration. And sometimes optimal shot placement is based on what bullet you are using. You don't necessarily want to take a shoulder shot with a rapid expansion bullet on an animal with a heavy bone structure. That would be a behind the shoulder for a double lung hit.

[@GotheRodeo]

Blue Wildebeest are some of the toughest African game, that's why we call them the poor man's buffalo. We shot one on a hunt in September with a 30.06, 180gr, perfect shot placement, and it still ran for close to a mile- so you might not have had much different results with a bigger caliber. Just got a 6.5 Creedmoor myself, and very keen to start testing it in the bush. Thanks for the great video!

[@mikemelina7395]

Deer>

[@Savoy_6]

Give us some feedback on the 6.5 creed on the Africa game. Bullet type and size, shoulder shot vs tradional behind the shoulder, animal size.

[@GotheRodeo]

@@Savoy_6 Sure, my Creedmoor has been in the field with me a bunch of times now, and it's done very well in the thick bush. I started with the Hornady ELD-X 143gr, which I decided was better for longer distances on the plains. But I moved over to a heavier bullet for the bush, where your average shooting distance is 80 yards. Currently I'm using Sellier & Bellot 156gr, and it's done tremendously well. I've always preferred shooting behind the shoulder, it's a lot less damage and meat loss. The Creedmoor does quite a bit of damage at such a short distance, and there's a decent amount of fragmentation, but all the shots I've taken have gone through the animal. The game I've taken down have been mostly smaller game: warthog, impala and blesbuck, blesbuck being the biggest (70kg, or 150 pounds roughly). Headshots and spine shots have worked particularly well. I do have an acquaintance who took a shoulder shot on a Blue Wildebeest with a Creedmoor, the bullet didn't penetrate through the bone, and the shot wasn't fatal. So on bigger game your shot placement is much more important. Hope this helps.

[@TheLonelyKittyCat]

I know that in Sweden the 6,5 x 55 SE or 6,5 Swedish has been used for Moose hunting for over a hundred years so I think good shot placement is truly the deciding factor. Flinching with a 300 win mag would probably, in most situations, be worse than a good 6,5 shot, the exception being obviously elephants and big dangerous African game. That’s my two cents

[@chrisdaniel1339]

I totally agree! 6.5 Swede and the 6.5-264 Norma are fantastic hunting cartridges. High BC projectiles retain energy, drift less, High SD for deep penetration (with the correct bullet selection) lighter recoiling, and accurate. I prefer all copper projectiles as I know there is little chance of having a bullet failure even if presented a very close shot and it will retain damn near all its weight, I know the copper ballistic tip/hollow point is going to do its job. Cup and core, soft points, and even some modern A frame and bonded bullets do fail or lose a significant amount of bullet weight leading to poor outcomes.

[@markknox182]

Moose in Sweden are somewhat smaller then those in North America

[@kevinconway510]

From shooting deer with 12ga, 20ga, .270, .308, 6.5 creedmoor, and numerous. .50cal muzzle loader load variations from .44mag to .45cal sabot loads, shot placement has been key with everything!

[@9gagerofl]

I love the 6.5 prc. It does it all and with minimal recoil. Deer, hogs, elk, black bear, moose, and more! Ive seen too many vids of the prc absolutely light it up to think its too small to do the job. Compound that with its flat trajectory, its a winner! It penetrated the most on your test as-well! Total package imo.

[@iblongshia]

I hunt elk with 6.5 prc and I've shot many over 400 yards. It requires a follow up shot. Other than that, it's a great flat shooting round.

[@9gagerofl]

@@iblongshia everyone has their opinions. Personally, I disagree. But, nothing can be too dead. Best of luck to you!

[@TechieTard]

@@iblongshia If your shot placement's on target and you needed a follow up shot, you're using the wrong bullet for the distance.

[@iblongshia]

@@TechieTard I switched to 6.5 prc for fun, just because I wanted to but I found out that shots past 400 yards (even with good shot placement) doesn't have enough knock down power. I've since gone back to my 300wm or 300 ultramag for further shot's.

[@drunknnirish]

The PRC is a great round imo but the ELD-X is a poorly designed bullet for big game. I would have zero issues elk or moose hunting if I was running 140 grain Partitions, Accubonds, or TTSXs.

[@joshpowers200]

This was a great series of tests. Super impressive and very helpful. I think your conclusion is dead on; within the normal deer calibers, bullet choice and shot placement are more important than than caliber choice.

[@johncrimi4397]

I reload for about 30 different calibers and try to develop a "do everything" load staying within the capability of the cartridge. Most of my loads end up with Nosler Partitions or Barnes TSX/TTSX. And blue wildebeest are tough so don't be too hard on yourself. That same shot with a TSX and you would have found that bull in 200 yards. Exit wounds become critical on these tougher antelope in my experience.

[@thebigsurg]

That is normal for a bluewildebeest. They are called the poor man's buffalo. They said they are born ill but with every shot they receive they get stronger. From SA

[@gerry6.8]

Their will to live sounds amazing. Over here in BC mountain goat has the same reputation, if you don't hit them right the first time especially you can have a rodeo on your hands.

[@nielrossouw7831]

Goed om ander SAners hier te sien! Theuns' description is spot on. They really don't like dying.

[@retrocny5625]

I've taken a lot of game over the years, ever since I was of legal age to hunt(14 for Archery, 16 for firearm in my state back then). I've always sort of laughed off the idea of people trying to buy a rifle/cartridge in the effort of ensuring they "drop em in their tracks". Short of a perfectly placed head shot or a spine shot, you can't really guarantee that no matter the cartridge in my experience. These animals are incredibly resilient and they're all different. I've talked to a lot of people on that quest for either a new rifle or new bullet that will "drop em", in my experience it's a never ending quest. I had to hunt with a shotgun for many years as well, both 20ga and 12ga & with both rifled slugs and sabots, prior to my county becoming a rifle-eligible county. When you see a whitetail take a 1oz slug to the heart & lungs at 20 yards and still run 100 yards, you sort of get a new perspective when they can take all that energy and keep running on adrenaline, and when you field dress them you see the utter devastation and wonder how the hell it's possible. And then on the flip side of that, I've seen deer hit at 200 yards with a 95 grain .243 bullet drop instantly, with far less internal damage caused compared to a much heavier shotgun slug. That bullet will be moving a hell of a lot faster than the 1oz slug, even with the range difference, but in terms of energy on target, the slug wins hands down when you compare those two specific cases. These days, I whitetail hunt pretty exclusively with .308, due to the land I hunt and the ranges I can shoot at. My rifles tend to prefer hunting bullets in the 165 grain weight range over 150 grainers. I've also moved away from lead bullets and use Barnes TTSX pretty exclusively these days. The accuracy, weight retention and penetration has all been superb.

[@WillyK51]

Coming from a shotgun only country, smoothbores with slugs not accurate enough, yet buckshot was quite efective on deer, Ups, you had to sneak within 35 Yds, That was long before screw in chokes, I extended my range when I got a 30-30 barrel and had it turned to fit my 12 Ga barrel

[@jozefhorvat3625]

👍👍👍

[@JamesJones-cx5pk]

Hornady SST 150 in my .308 blows up quick and jellies internals.👍

[@ErikS308]

The ELD-X is one of those rapidly expanding bullets that dump every foot pound in the game. This is good, but often doesn't leave a blood trail if the target doesn't drop. I am a fair chase WT guide in SC and see over 50 deer a year shot by hunters. I firmly believe that penetration coupled with proper shot placement is paramount. Look for a bullet that exits yet still expands. I have good results with the Barnes TSX line.

[@Mex_the_Fox]

I switched to copper because the ELD-X was to harsh on the meat... Barnes TTSX and Sako's Powerhead Blade is awesome

[@raleighsanford5111]

That kid is cool, steady as a rock.

[@chadmcswain5389]

Over the years of doing a lot of depredation work on hogs and deer, I've found that frontal mass width is just as important (if not more) as sectional density. Yes most of the 6.5s have great BC and SD, but I've yet to see any of them produce the amount of one stop shots as the 30 calibers such as 308s, 30-06, 300 win, etc. Don't get me wrong.... I love the 6.5 Creedmoor (and even the 6.5 Grendel) on the bench. I even prefer the 6.5 Creedmoor for long range hunting (500+ yards) over the 300 win mag (on deer size game only) simply because it's much easier on the shoulder (unless you run a brake). However, as a general rule I just prefer the larger bleed hole of the larger diameter bullets in the field on medium to large game.

[@rgibson759]

Chad Mcswain I agree. When you change distances and game size, some serious consideration needs to go to bullet design that can reach the internals, then hemorrhage them with a wound channel that can do this quickly and ethically. My experience is the same, although the smaller calibers work, the 30 calibers to this best.

[@waynemensen4252]

I've been running copper for 30 yrs. They go in the caliber your using and exit twice that diameter with tremendous hydro shock in between. I have two holes pouring blood and I've not lost an animal. If you are doing depredation use a soft point, and even the 6.5 will slam them to the ground as they blow up, dropping all the energy immediately. They are cheaper as well. Good luck and as hansetx says "keep making those bacon pancakes"!

[@robbledot7290]

That’s why 7mm rem mag is perfect

[@Starcraft98marine]

Lonestarboars talks on this. He mentions next to .308 for hog, the 7.62x39 does the job inside his atypical stalking ranges. Better than 6.5grendel and 6.8spc. For pistol and PCC’s I was surprised to hear .45 at closer ranges for dispatching hog. .45 obviously has less penetration than 9mm but greater surface area

[@chuckfinley3152]

I like 20mm for light work

[@SeedFiddler-kp4eg]

I'm real surprised at the results of all of these different calibers. I would never have suspected this. Thanks for running these tests. God bless you and your family.

[@nielrossouw7831]

I hope you enjoyed your hunt in SA. It was great seeing your boy making good shots. For Bluewildebeest you should use a premium bonded bullet when shooting shoulder shots. I like 165gr Nosler Accubonds from my 30-06 when I hunt them. We have a saying in South Africa:"A Blue Wildebees is an animal that looks like it's dying but it becomes more alive the more times you shoot it." They are tough buggers that need a good bullet in a solid cartridge.

[@lenzadlberger]

In Germany we have the Saying what is better then a Bulletdiameter it is a bigger Bulletdiameter 😜 30.06 8x57is 8x68s 9.3x62 9.3x64 with Nosler Accubond or Partition or Barnes TTSX / Swift AFrame or when you want something from SA go with Peregrine VLR4 that are good Choices for Bigger Game

[@nielrossouw7831]

@@lenzadlberger 😂😂 That's the truth!

[@noahbouchard5155]

“Poor mans Buffalo”

[@juanjsolis9284]

It becomes more alive the more times you shoot it. 🍺🤣👍

[@jacobdendinger4140]

I enjoy your videos and your ability to have a valid opinion without being a know-it-all. I feel that the 6.5CM is a great cartridge for deer sized game with very little recoil. That being said; my favorite saying about hunting rifles go like this: "The caliber of the Person pulling the trigger is way more important than the the caliber of the bore." Meaning, once you decide on a cartridge size, you still need to choose the correct bullet, take the right shot, and be somewhat skilled about anatomy.

[@guygardiner1920]

I like your mature ethical approach and fact based assessments

[@randallingram7992]

When woods hunting I have my 45-70 or 30-30, medium range I use my 7mm-08 and my long range hunting is done with my 300 Weatherby Magnum. I have no intention of purchasing other rifles because it's the newest fad. No matter what calibers you choose to hunt with, match your bullet type with the proper velocities you plan to load. Matching proper caliber, with proper bullets and velocities for the yardage is a must.

[@wadesafool]

Praying for your channel to get bigger, this is some seriously good well articulated content!

[@exothermal.sprocket]

So long as some lacking-integrity punks from Sportsman's Warehouse stop plagiarizing his work.

[@brandonchrisp4598]

Hey Jim, I'm a relatively new viewer (1 week) and first time commenter. I like your style a lot and am now subscribed. I've done most of my rifle hunting with a 270 and barnes bullets. I completely agree with your take on bullet construction and penetration. I will add that the barnes bullet doesn't either damage capes as a benefit compared to a fragmenting bullet. I have killed 30+ deer, pronghorn and elk now with that combo and never once have I wished that I used a fragmenting bullet so that more energy was expended in the animal. I do understand the drive to use the most accurate bullet possible so that you can stretch your range. I do think that for hunting applications, it's important to have boundaries and can appreciate that you will go deer and down with your eld-x in the 6.5. I think that's sensible. I don't think the vast majority of your long range viewers will share that sensible boundary. The more you can do to promote that logic, the better for hunters and the quarry we chase. Thank you for the great work! Also, despite being a 270 fan, I think it's tragic the 6.8 Western didn't win in cartridge wars. I will be trying that chambering in 2022 and don't see how it will be anything other than improvement. I also share your affinity for the 7 SAUM on paper. These chamberings along with a future 7mm PRC are likely the future. Sorry for the long post, I'll keep my future remarks more concise.

[@deyangeo]

It's funny how the good old .308 performs more than decent in any scenario.

[@pseudopetrus]

And the 308 ammo is widely available, what is not to like?

[@lenzadlberger]

The 308 is like the 7x57 7x64 8x57is 30.06 9,3x62 they are all old but Gold they are all Medium Caliber not to small not to Heavy they Work as they Should they are Workhorses that doesnt fail you / the Gunmakers only give you New Calibers to sell you New Guns but the New Ones normally doesnt do a better Job than the good Old Ones Why are the 6.5x55 7x57 / 7x64/ 8x57 / 8x64 / 9.3x62 for the Metric or 270 Win 308 / 30.06 for the American Calibers around since 100 years and more cause they Do the Job and they Do it excellent on all Game on the Planet and with modern Bullets and Powders they Do it better than ever before The 6.5 Creedmoor with high Bc bullet bla bla bla you can put High Bc bullets on every of the good old ones too not exklusiv on the New Cartridges... i allways laugh about such arguments for New Cartridges... 😀

[@rodneyhickman825]

More proof that the eldx bullets not the best for deep penetration .

[@lenzadlberger]

@@rodneyhickman825 yes when you want Penetration go with Nosler Partition or Accubond / Barnes TTSX / Swift AFrame / Peregrine VLR4 (excellent Bullets as Alternative for Barnes TTSX they are from South Africa) and so on

[@jmkhenka]

@@rodneyhickman825 yeah ELDX is a soft bullet made to expand properly at low velocites (long range). I would think that they are TO soft for large animals and expand to fast at close ranges, if i shoot a moose i want both lungs penetrated and preferably passthrough, if not they will be able to run for miles before dying, instead of couple yards.

[@tomcarvelli6464]

You are right on the money. Next to shot placement bullet construction is very important.

[@g.simard854]

The deeper it penetrates, the slower energy is delivered. Penetration is kind of one variable on a complex equation. Great video thanks you.

[@banditgriot2000]

You have an excellent channel. Bullet design and target distance play a role in ballistic performance. If you were to look at the performance of the loads you tested at the distances you are likely to take game, you might see bigger differences in performance. I am truly curious to see what the 6.5 Creedmoor versus a 7mm Rem Mag looks like at 200-300 yards. Again, your channel content is fantastic, keep the comparisons and honest reviews coming!

[@simondenis9511]

It’s true that the vast majority of gel tests we see are at short range. That leaves a big knowledge gap as to what really happens at longer hunting ranges. Nearly all modern hunting bullets look good at short range. But what really happens passed 200 meters?

[@wcndguy5302]

@@simondenis9511 just load down the powder charge to lower the velocity. There has been tests done like this on KZbin. Results are less dramatic wound channels.

[@gavinreid1649]

@@wcndguy5302 Just downloading the velocity might hide other factors. At 200 yards vs 15 yards the angle of incidence would differ and that would have an impact on bullet stability and the likelyhood of tumbling. The spin imparted on the bullet also differs, the bullet leaving the barrel at a higher velocity would have greater spin than the bullet leaving at a lower velocity.

[@wcndguy5302]

@@gavinreid1649 I think those factors probably wouldn’t matter much at all. Major driving force is velocity.

[@gavinreid1649]

@@wcndguy5302 I disagree, both the angle of incidence and the rate of spin will affect the likelyhood of the bullet tumbling.

[@sigvald11]

One of the most helpful things I found is if my estimated distance has my bullet hitting at over 2500 ft./s I use a monolithic bullet but if it’s below 2500 ft./s i use a lead core bullet.

[@mikemacmahon3691]

I love ballistic gel test. They are a no bs assessment on which one is superior regarding bullet construction. Thank you for the information you are sharing!!!

[@mrstangthang98]

That’s super interesting. I definitely wasn’t expecting such similar results out of such different bullets.

[@shepherd8203]

I just got a Weatherby Vanguard 6.5 creedmore love that rifle. It’s not loud , the Recoil very manageable that makes me a better shooter. I put a Vortex Viper HS 4-16x44 because of all your testing. Thank you for your work great channel. Most of all I trust your research that it’s not for the manufactures and sponsorship it for us. 👍👏

[@bawbbob7830]

Was expecting more conclusive results. Speaks volumes to bullet selection. If you ever did a re-test of this I’d love to see the same caliber and bullet with varying grain weights to test the theory of high sectional density= better penetration. As always, love the videos.

[@beaudawg6799]

I wrote a long comment about my 6.5 Creedmoor conversion but didn't want to bore you. Long story short, I live in the Colorado Rockies, Elk being my game of choice. I run a creedmore...and I've yet to have one make it more than a few yards. I'm not a crack shot, or expert marksman... Just know my limitations as a marksman... and understand the necessity of a well placed round on a vital area of a large animal such as our Elk. I think the Creedmoor is a excellent hunting round for larger game. Kudos to your channel. I find it entertaining and informative.

[@dbarr8261]

I am curious on what rounds you use. I have a 6.5CM AR and love the accuracy.

[@nj-bz8pv]

I’ve saw a few elk flattened with a .308 Barnes copper bullet. Those copper bullets are great for big animals

[@Carlyle_SFFS]

You are making such a valid point with any type hunting bullet. Bullet construction, penetration, and shot placement (not in that order) is key when taking a bullet hunting. This is why Nosler Partitions were developed. Barnes and others are also great choices. Shot placement is so key when hunting and cannot be stressed enough. You are also correct, those that say that any one caliber, bullet, or shot placement is a guarantee that a one shot drop on an animal is going to happen is just plain lying to themselves and others. It doesn't always happen even when all the stars align on a kill shot. Great video! Keep up the good work!

[@benjaminbenedict7779]

Great video. Love seeing you family and son taking shots and harvesting the game. As fas as what you said about some animals will just run farther, I have had a small white tail buck run over a 100 yard after shooting it at 80 yards with a 7mm mag. Also had a 7’2” black bear only go 40 yds after being shot with a 6.5cr. You never know how you animal will react

[@spencerwiltse2855]

Crazy. I was shopping for a rifle the other day and it was my first time seeing 6.5 Creedmoor. I'd never heard of it so I've been asking around and then I see one of your shorts which leads me to this video and bam, I have some info, you have another subscriber!

[@altruisticscoundrel]

Great test! With your Mossberg Patriot, please do a test with a $10 limbsaver barrel tuner with various 308 ammo?

[@waynesides2626]

I've said it before! Shot placement is what you are teaching. Good for you. I've killed many mule deer and antelope further with a 58gr VMAX out of a 243 win. Before you go ballistic I wasn't young and they were head shot's. I've never hunted Africa. But I've hunted Alaska big game many times. Most of the time I used a 7mm rem mag. The difference between the two was negligible because of shot placement and knowing my own limits. I don't go out and test bullets because I'm only comfortable out to the ranges I was taught to shoot. You are doing a great job.

[@michaelsteyn1822]

Dude I like your video's! Like many have said, the Wildebeest is a real tough animal in SA and shot placement is the most important thing on them. If you shoot too far back or too low....... you going to walk allot! The ELD-x is a great bullet and I used them for a long time an all game from Springbok, Wildebeest and Eland. I must add, I shoot a 30-06 and use 200g bullets which help, but have shot a big Eland with a 6.5 x 55 using 142gr ELD-x, so it can be done.

[@NLopezzz]

That is a true testament to bullet design. It's not under penetration, it is the ability to stop a bullet with 50% more energy in the same distance. Shooting NA big game, I want a big, heavy bullet delivering all of its energy in the target. For African game where you need to penetrate the shoulder I want a different bullet. Great video!

[@porscheguy19]

Seems the 7mm is dumping a whole lot more energy in the same wound channel without wasting it in over-penetration.

[@Ryan22128]

Agreed

[@vanscos]

I also agree. Also, what’s your terminal energy with 6.5’s at 400 versus 7mm mag. In case of lesser shot placement always better to error on side of energy. In addition, lower terminal energy may lead to greater chance of bullet deflection from shoulder or rib. Might look like good shot at entrance but, where is it bouncing around in chest cavity?

[@inmyopinion_3672]

????? Over penetration? That's exactly what you want when you hunt. Animals haven't read about energy transfer.

[@falba1492]

Over penetration?! A good bullet dumps energy and penetrates clear through creating a wound channel and a good blood trail. Think Partitions and the tougher A-Frames.

[@maxtheroofer8004]

have you never shot an animal? there is no such thing as "over penetration", two holes are better than one

[@TheRabidfan]

Tests like this improve the ethics of hunting. Thanks for doing it.

[@bc30cal99]

Interesting video and a well thought out test. Years back we loaded a 165gr BT Interlock in a .308 carbine, an '06, a .308 Norma and a .300 Win Mag, then went out as a family for a few seasons and took as many local whitetail and mulie bucks as we could. We also do our own meat processing so get a good idea of the tissue damage. While there was "some" difference in terminal performance, it absolutely wasn't as much as any of us expected. Nowadays I usually hunt with a 6.5 Swede - the grandfather of the 6.5CM I suppose, but it's loaded with monometal bullets.

[@dn895]

Great to hear this conclusion. Even ammo packet will tell you .308 has more muzzle energy than 6.5cm. It's at distance where the ballistics favour the 6.5 cm over .308 in energy and accuracy. If not beyond 400 m, not much in it.

[@dylanW50]

I would’ve been curious to see how a 30-06 would’ve stacked up against these cartridges

[@MrMalicious5]

It's all shot placement. Plenty of professional cull hunters in Africa hunt just about every plains game with 5.56.

[@nielrossouw7831]

@@MrMalicious5 Correct but culling is all about headshots. If you shoot body shots on a cull you will lose money as you lose carcass weight. I wont shoot an Eland on the shoulder with a 223Rem but it would work for headshots. I have culled a bunch of animals with my 22-250 because it's flat shooting, low recoiling and economic to shoot. I won't hunt bigger animals with a 22-250 etc. as I have seen them fail on body shots too many times. Shot placement is always key but the bullet has to be tough and travel fast enough to penetrate deep enough to kill.

[@BartTheSpartan]

On a ballistics aspect a 6.5 PRC carries more energy from the 160-200yd mark and onward, under that distance the 30-06 has more energy. Has more to do with the BC than anything and having a larger bullet in the 30-06 would pose an argument that the actual energy isn’t the best medium to measure lethality. Would definitely be a good comparison video

[@teddyf9438]

@@BartTheSpartan is that still true with a 30-06 nosler or barnes vortex bullet with a ballistic tip? I have 180gr balistic tip nosler rounds that shoot 2750fps, or a 168gr that shoots 2900fps?

[@vdog4799]

@@MrMalicious5 That is so crazy! I would never have thought that

[@biggs8729]

Obviously bigger hits harder, but that doesn't always mean it's better. I have a friend who took his 15 year old daughter out for her first elk hunt with a 6.5 CM Ruger Predator rifle. He trained her all summer, even made her do wind sprints to get her heart rate up. She got her elk with one shot on a high shoulder shot at 350 yards. The elk made it 15 yards and tipped over. She wouldn't have been able to do that with a magnum or even a 180 gr 308. Recoil would have made her flinch. The point is that the 6.5 was and is up to the task and proves it over and over. Not saying it's always better, but in this case it probably was.

[@red5express905]

6.5(264)has always had exceptional penetrating abilities from the 6.5x55 to the 6.5-06,264 winchester and rem mags the 6.5-06 ironically sets between 25-06 and 270 but will smoke both.

[@kevinarcher5398]

Understanding sectional density will help a ton with this exact issue. 2 totally different cartridges can have similar penetration if their sectional densities are the same. Also, the same cartridge can have poor penetration on the light weight grain vs great penetration on the heavy weight grain. Always good to understand this when choosing a weight grain.

[@scottrossingnol6034]

I think bullet design/construction and velocity are absolutely more important than a specific cartridge. Bullets that work best in something like a 6.5 CM are very likely to be different than the one that works best in a 6.5-300 Wby.

[@echofoxtrotwhiskey1595]

Yes, but some cartridges can generate more velocity even with the same caliber/bullet design.

[@alexwanless5859]

I have two deer rifles one is 7mm mag one is 6.5cm. I shoot those interlock bullets the same ones you tested. I will say from quite a bit of experience on Michigan white tails they run with the 6.5 they don’t run with the 7mm. Of course shot placement matters in that very much. Just thought I’d share. I was very excited when you pulled those two rounds out being that’s what I use. Keep up the good work.

[@Bob_Diesel]

When you gutted and skinned the wildebeest did you examine the penetration?? That would’ve been helpful to know in that scenario since he ran 3/4 mile

[@Bob_Diesel]

@@sha6mm nonetheless he went straight to doing penetration tests on gel without examining the penetration on the actual animal that caused his suspicion

[@mdixon26288]

7mm is too fast to run cup and core bullets, they just end up fragmenting or overexpanding. Faster dosent mean more penetration if the bullet construction dosen't hold up. Bonded or copper bullets will resist overexpansion and give much better penetration.

[@borkwoof696]

@@sha6mm ELD-Xs are rebranded target bullets. They’re crap.

[@doghousedon1]

@@borkwoof696 Those ELD-Xs blow up (on me) like a varmint bullet. I flat out won't use them on anything bigger than a coyote and never on anything I intend to eat. Great paper punchers though. Game animals are not made of gel and actual recovered bullets tell the real story. It's to bad those ELD-X bullets aren't bonded.

[@borkwoof696]

@@doghousedon1 yup, I suppose they’re ok at longer distances and lower velocities but a) should you/do you really hunt at those distances and b) why not use a bullet that also works for the more likely close range shots.

[@DCBrink]

So here's my take. I have been watching your channel for some time and I understand that you are a seasoned marksman and assume hunter too. With regards to bullet choice - I have taken a Bleshbuck (same as the second buck in this video) ranged at 270 meters (practically the same distance) with 140 Berger VLD Hunt. The buck dumped all of its blood in less than 20 metes/yards and fell over because it now had an extra orifice through the heart. This was the perfect shot and bullet combo as the Berger bullets are designed to expand very quickly and obliterate this target as it bursts open after just 3 inches of penetration, and what's left is the shank that cuts through to the other side. That's their "Dead Right There" philosophy, and it could be argued as the ideal, because it results in minimal carcass damage (however it could also go very wrong too) A year after that the Hornady ELDX took to the market with huge success, and I had similar results, with the exception that the ELDX held together a bit more and this resulted in more often knocking down animals, because it would disable both front legs, and causing more meat/muscle damage. Or if its not a fatal shot it seemed like an animal would be able to run further, as its would mostly have flesh wounds, and maybe a broken leg bone or rib. Where the bergers generally would cause more catastrophic damage in the body cavity. So back to the beginning statement - a Wildebeast has really odd anatomy compared to other African and even Northern Hemisphere game, and is know for often catching out hunters with shot placements that just misses the mark by a bit. So when just missing the mark with a bullet like ELDX that retains its mass well, compared to the almost frangible nature of Berger its not uncommon to see an animal that is disabled but not down or still able to keep up with its herd. Or maybe like you say, this is just my anecdotal experience. One thing I firmly believe, is every hunt has its own experiences that could cause you to re-evaluate all your previous experiences.

[@MTMILITIAMAN7.62]

Sectional Density used to be the determining factor in penetration on game. For years hunters picked heavy for caliber bullets at modest velocities and relied on momentum and Sectional Density to drive bullets deep. The 160 gr round nose in the 6.5x55 Swede is a known moose killer in this configuration. The 220 gr round nose in the 06 was taken all over Africa and Asia with good success. The advent of higher velocity cartridges makes deep penetration difficult. As velocity increases, so does expansion. As expansion increases, so does shock trauma, but at the expense of penetration. For heavy game using high velocity cartridges and loads, bullet selection becomes crucial. Monolithic expanding bullets like the Barnes TSX and Hornady GMX, and partitioned bullets like the Nosler Partition and Swift Aframe have a good reputation for handling big game with magnum rifle velocity and still exhibiting good penetration. But still to this day, large caliber non-expanding round nose slugs with excellent Sectional Densities at moderate velocity are preferred for the largest and toughest game.

[@nunya7319]

I hunt almost exclusively with my 6.5x55 Swede. I reload Swift Sirocco II bullets. I've taken fox all the way up to Elk with that round. And I wouldn't hesitate using it on moose if I'm ever blessed with the opportunity to moose hunt. I don't think the 6.5's get the cred they deserve. Love your vids watching the younger generation hunt. It appears to me they're hooked and will hunt for life. Great job young men !

[@gagemason3865]

Bullet design is everything. In my opinion, traditional jacketed bullets of most manufacturers in any caliber tend to underpenetrate when coming into contact with bone. Especially in calibers smaller than 30 cal. Working in a butcher shop that processes over a hundred deer per season, there’s a jar of bullets and bullet fragments that support your findings. That’s why I use Barnes TTSX bullets whenever I can nowadays. With the bonus of not having to worry about lead fragments in the meat.

[@afrancisco3814]

I’m not big on subscribing to BS. I like your math, your numbers, your science and your message. Keep sending the videos my friend

[@jasonpranger8485]

I would live to see that same test with 7mag vs 7mm-08

[@lklencho]

I’ve been hunting deer with a 7mm mag since I was 12 years old. I’m 51 and have killed too many deer to remember. With the 7mm whitetails drop. 3 years ago I started using a Browning Hell’s Canyon in 6.5 Creedmoor. Love the gun, the accuracy, the light recoil, but I’m going back to the 7mm. Lost two deer in three years.

[@Mike-xi4zt]

The lost deer probably from the match type bullets. I have had the problem.

[@colesammons2137]

That’s why I’ve steered away from the 6.5 prc. The factory bullet choice is eldx or eldm only and I don’t handload. I think with a nosler, swift, or Barnes bullet that prc would be an elk sized game hammer out to around 500 yards.

[@johnnynesper8196]

There’s getting to be more factory options

[@LaXStuD9191]

Nosler makes a 142gr Trophy Grade 6.5 PRC. They work great but I still the Hornady Eldx is better.

[@francoisbuys8783]

@@LaXStuD9191 the eldx might group better. But the nosler accubond LR bullets are just a better than the ELDX for hunting. The ELDX just turns to powder on impact. And Ive taken enough bluewildebeest to know that you dont use a bullet that preforms like the ELDX on them

[@lenzadlberger]

@@francoisbuys8783 for Handloaders go with Swift AFrame, Nosler Partition or Accubond, Barnes TTSX, Peregrine VLR4 or for Bushhunting VRG3

[@philbaker29]

Fact, 6.5PRC out performs a 7mag past 200yds (same bullet weight), and delivers over 1500 ftlbs at 500yds. More than enough for elk if you shoot them right 🤔

[@millermanhal]

Interesting results. Very informative. Did not expect. Great stuff

[@Marcusb338]

Great vid, the solution for you is a standard bonded bullet! I’d use a accubond or something similar. The 160gr in the 7mm rem mag is amazing on Sambar deer here in aus which get huge. When you’re taking hard quartering shots that penetration is really needed. It usually retains 60-75% weight even after going a long way through a big animal which is tough on projectiles

[@dionysis84]

Agree 100%. That is why they reccomend accubond bullets for big game like elk

[@jakeminix158]

I love the fact that you are not all biased I own a few guns chambered the same with different set up meaning AR vs bolt...I personally think that can change pressure and should be noted. Like I said awesome job keep up the good work!👍

[@alaskaraftconnection-alask3397]

Love the experimentation and process... It does reveal some interesting points (pun intended) with regards to projectile profile + construction and speed vs. penetration in the cartridges you selected. I'd like the additional test added to this (same process) for example/comparison using .375 H&H... like a plain jane, yet typically good/accurate/reliable loading in Federal factory load of 300gr. power-shock soft-points. As we know... perhaps one of the most versatile allrounders for safari and heavier game without the requirements/need for more complex bullet constructions. I use the .375 H&H for just about everything here in Alaska. Have always been a fan of the 300gr. Nosler Partition. Sometimes here the hunter is doing the hunting... sometimes the hunter is stalked and the hunted. Also be of comparison interest to use a stiff load in a muzzleloader or 12 ga 3" Black Magic Bren. slug in same experiment.

[@johnshields9110]

I read one of WDM Bell's book on African hunting elephants (and other game) using a 7mm Mauser. He used nothing but 'solids' (FMJ) and stated the long of beam (no pencil point) semi rounded head ammo stayed true on its course through the head of an elephant best of all designs. He stated velocites 2200-2400 fps, about 170-180 grains were his choice. He used 303 British and sometimes a 318. He killed a ton of plains game with a 6.5 of some sort. He was a fantastic shot way beyond the pale of normal people though, and his bullet placement was exact.

[@philmore5614]

Is penetration the issue or is it the amount of energy that bullet is able to deliver into the target. The amount force that a round can effectively deliver into a target will determine how fast an animal drops much more then how much it can penetrate and is much more important factor to consider for ethical hunting, in my opinion

[@No_nonsense302]

Good point, notice how the pallet was more disturbed with the 308 and 7mm? Could've been shot placement, but I feel like it had more to do with energy

[@Gladiusrides]

Hence why (this is to support your argument) that airsoft fields use joules to limit guns by velocity and projectile weight.

[@trevorkolmatycki4042]

It's both... Ideally you want energy transfer to destroy vital organs plus penetration to get through the front shoulder and produce a good blood trail via exit wound. Barnes TTSX and Hornady GMX accomplish this and are ideal for Big Moose and Bull Elk. For little deer, expansion bullets like SST or Interlock or Nosler BT work fine. I would not use expansion bullets on Big moose and elk for fear of not adequately penetrating the shoulder. The middle ground are the bonded bullets like Accubond and Interbond. They Expand reliably and penetrate adequately.

[@trevorkolmatycki4042]

@Paul Energy numbers are nothing more than a simple quantification of the energy potential of the projectile, with more energy there is more potential to cause tissue damage depending on what the projectile does within the animal. Frangible bullets that fracture in the lung cavity are very lethal, but if they can't get past a large bone to deliver this effect to the vitals it's a fail. I agree that frangible target bullets are not wise choices for hunting. However light game like whitetail deer that do not have massive shoulder bones in front of vitals can definitely be taken reliably with rapid expansion style hunting bullets such as SST, Nosler BT, and the like (but staying within published max and min velocity limits)... provided you can place the round in the vital zone. I wouldn't use these on big moose and elk... no way! For the big bruins you want something that will go right through both shoulders and leave a good enough mess in between... My favorite is Barnes TTSX (staying above published min. velocity limits). On little deer, the Barnes TTSX passes through with plenty of retained weight and energy but they deliver sufficient enough damage anyways because they expand so reliably... You will get runners on some lung shots but they will leave blood trail so Barnes is versatile for pretty much anything large or small. The reason for going with something like SST on deer is that they are inexpensive and very accurate so you can shoot lots at the range with your SST loads without breaking the bank. IMHO. I wish the bonded bullets like the Hornady Interbond and Nosler Accubond weren't so darn pricey and hard to find... they are sweet... and sort of like in between the performance characteristics of a Hornady SST and a Barnes TTSX. So many great choices... can't with till the supply chain recovers and we can find them on the shelves again. Cheers.

[@philmore5614]

@Paul Energy can kill and is what causes tissue damage. there are many examples of energy doing so. And I’m not referring to ammo the brakes apart when it enters an animal that kind of projectile wouldn’t be effective at delivering energy at all. An effective round should be able to stay together, dump a large amount of energy into the target, and still be able to penetrate deep enough to either pass through or making to the opposite side of a target.

[@JarvisOutdoors]

So I purchased a 6.5 CM last year. I have taken 4 deer with it between the two hunting seasons. Shooting a Federal Premium Trophy Copper 120 grain. Deer #1 fully mature doe approximately 110-120 lbs, shot was 200 yards with good shot placement deer went about 50 yards with an excellent blood trail. Deer #2 medium size doe around 100 lbs , 75 yard shot she was dead before she hit the ground never moved. Deer#3 another mature doe 110-120 lbs 60 yard shot also went straight down no tracking necessary. Deer#4 this was the first buck Iv taken with the 6.5 CM and this bullet. He was a 3 year old buck around 160-170 lbs, shot was 155 yards the bullet placement was in the vitals but maybe an inch or two back. The bullet entered the deer but did not pass through it appears it just came apart. Both lungs and liver were completely turned into mush. He ran over 200 yards and left no blood trail, I was very surprised by this after the results on the first 3 deer. I’m starting to wonder if I should move up to a heavier bullet maybe the Barns LRX 127 grain or heavier yet the Hornady ELDX 143 grain. What’s your thoughts? Thanks Update- 1/10/22 Took another deer with this same load 120 grain Federal Trophy Copper. An adult doe shot was 90 yards and she dropped in her tracks. Never twitched. So 3 out of 5 Whitetails taken with this load out of the 6.5 CM have dropped. I’m just confused about #4 that ran 200 yards without an exit hole. Still would like your thoughts on going to a heavier projectile. Thanks

[@duanesamuelson2256]

Though I have no way to quantity the energy expended watching the gel block there was definitely a difference in how far it jumped... and the energy it used to move. Perhaps containing the gel to remove this variable if you are just testing for penetration? Nice visual btw

[@mrzrog]

Can you adopt me and take me to hunt in Africa? Seriously though, you are correct. It’s about the bullet construction/design and shot placement more so than the cartridge most of the time. I’ve seen great success with 6.5 PRC on bear, elk, moose, and deer. All shooting Barnes TTSX. I’ve never seen an ELD X used on game so I won’t speak to that. Lastly, African game tend to be tougher than North American game. The PHs I have talked to all agree they prefer when their clients show up with a 30-06 or 300 WM loaded with copper solids.

[@falba1492]

I’ve mentioned this on your channel several times before. Cup and core are not the most ideal bullets for hunting. IMO, big game should be hunted with Partitions, A-Frames or monolithics (pick your brand, I like Barnes LRXs). What advise did you get from you PH in Africa?

[@jonathanrogers9961]

the Federal terminal ascent and swift sirocco are good choices as well. lead up front with a heavier tapered jacket, and a solid copper base.

[@falba1492]

@@jonathanrogers9961 - I completely agree.

[@lenzadlberger]

@@jonathanrogers9961 also Peregrine VLR4 there are many good Solid Bullets out there i hunt with Nosler Partition and Accubond, Barnes TTSX and Peregrine VLR4

[@jonathanrogers9961]

@@lenzadlberger will have to look into the peregrine. Not a fan of accubond for big game. Among solids lehigh and hammer also come to mind

[@lenzadlberger]

@@jonathanrogers9961 the Accubonds i use for the Time in the Year when we go for Meat Hunting Wildboar Piglets or for Fellow Deer / Roe Deer and Buck So from 10 up to 60kg for this they work great for Bigger i use Nosler Partition Barnes TTSX or Peregrine VLR4 my 308 works great with Barnes ttsx and the Accubond / my 7x57R with Nosler Partition and Barnes TTSX and in my 8x57is and 8x68s i go with the Peregrine or Partition espacially in the 8x68s you need Hard Bullets all thin Jackets nearly explode in it and so does the Target... 200grains at 3000 ft/s is no Joke 😜

[@roostercoggburn7436]

6.5 is known in Scandinavia as a deep penetrating caliber. With its long bullet length the 6.5 was basically a partition bullet before partitions were invented! Bullet mushrooms so far and the shank keeps driving through. 6.5/.264” diameter bullets are the perfect combination of SD and BC. A few of us have known that for a while before the 6.5 Creedmoor blew up in popularity. We were shooting the old 6.5x55 and said to ourselves,”hey they finally figured it out!” LOL.

[@robertraman6307]

In Sweden we shoot about 80 000 moose every year. Historically most of the moose and brown bears are shot with 6.5x55mm. I would say .308w is taking over. I own two Sako rifles in .308w and have shoot 9 moose so far. A few capercaillies as well.

[@northerntier87]

Great review. Curious to see the new 6.8 western performance.

[@gregpace4676]

Back in the day, we always measured the diameter of a recovered bullet, the more it expands the less it penetrates (you demonstrated this with your copper bullet). Most of the deer I have shot is with a 165 grain Nosler Partition, best of both worlds at all distances. Don't forget that the speed of the bullet has an incremental effect on expansion, check with the bullet manufacturer for recommended distance(speed) of your particular cartridge for a given distance.

[@UngulateGuardian797]

If you want a good penetrating bullet for the 6.5 Creedmoor, try the 127 gr Barnes LRX

[@tsf6401]

My son took a great 6x6 bull elk last year using the 127 Barnes LRX in 6.5 Creed. Granted it was only 110 yards. But we have come to like that bullet for his Creed. I use Nosler 130 AB in my 6.5 PRC and it has always been "no tracking required".

[@raymondroberts3878]

I'm Raymond from Virginia, and you probably helped me make the decision to get a 300 wsm. I love your videos.

[@OneLocalStudent]

I wish you had concluded with 6.5 Grendel. Since the penetration was close to the same with all of the variety of muzzle energy levels, I'm curious how the Grendel would fare in relation to the Creedmoor.

[@jmkhenka]

Well, it has ligher bullets at lower velocities.. You might get penetration but only because it move to slow to expand properly. Its NO replacement for creedmoor or 308, they are TWICE the gunpowder. With copper bullets (say a 100 grain) you will get full penetration on most animals if you have a 20" barrel.. But thats mostly the design of copper bullets.

[@OneLocalStudent]

@@jmkhenka spoken like someone that doesn't know much about grendel terminal ballistics. 123g hunting rounds expand reliably out of an 18 inch barrel out to 400y with most hunting loads. And if the quantity of powder mattered that much, the 7mm mag would have more penetration. This test showed that the increased penetration from all that extra energy was minimal. So again, I'd like to see how it fares for myself, rather than assuming things based on numbers on a chart.

[@jmkhenka]

@@OneLocalStudent there is sufficient videos on the Grendel. It's no replacement for a larger round. I have one, would never bring it for hunting (if swedish laws allowed it, wich it doesnt. It lacks 500J of energy @100 meters) what i normalt would use a 308 for, or a 6.5x55.

[@JTTTTT850]

@@jmkhenka Grendel is 35gr and Creedmoor is 52gr case capacity so no not even close. 70gr would be double the capacity of 6.5 Grendel.

[@JTTTTT850]

@@jmkhenka and i just watched a gel test of a 120gr Hornady GMX at 2550fps penetrate 27” in Gel with a bigger wound channel than these because it’s a superior bullet construction.

[@1RobHunter1]

For big game, bonded or copper 170gr - 180gr is a lot better than a 140gr bullet in yaw and larger wound channel. A 30-06 in those bullets should deliver more mass and bigger wound channel. We aren't sniping big game past 500yds.

[@matthewsprenger6471]

280 ackley is by far the best all around cartridge. 7 rem mag only does better with heavier bullets. 280 ackley with 168 bergers is superb performance with second to none efficiency!

[@1bayouboy1]

I think that was a very good test series and it shows a couple of really important points. As you noted there was a difference in energy between the projectiles yet their penetration was very similar across the board for the same bullet construction. That means the energy from the more energetic projectiles had to be deposited into the target. In game this would be a combination of the energy to deform the projectile, the hydrostatic shock of the temporary wound channel, and the permanent wound channel. If you look up the testing done by Dr Fackler where the Army selected 6.8 as an optimal balance between terminal performance and ballistics you will see something similar to your testing. The end result is bullet selection is VERY important. If you are using a very powerful cartridge you have more leeway for a poor performing bullet to still be effective. And ALWAYS, shot placement is THE most important factor.

[@andybannon7680]

African game isn’t bullet proof but seems more tenacious than our whitetail A nosler partition, swift A frame or Barnes TSX would be my pick before a ELD-X

[@MrJtin69]

Facts

[@vanscos]

I agree. Bullet design is more important. From many different KZbin channels testing ELD-X bullets, the general conclusion is the perform like match bullets. Smaller wound channels and greater chance of breaking apart. Can’t argue with the Nosler Partition.

[@Jor0716]

Super informative! Not only do we get ballistics gel tests, we also get real world performance!

[@403outdoors4]

Could you do one on 300 prc vs 300wm and wsm? I would really like to see the difference there

[@gunman-6646]

That would be a good one. I would love to see that also!

[@adammack4772]

I'd like to see 300 weatherby in that mix also

[@benshones6588]

Might as well throw 30-06 and 308 in there also battle of the 30 cals

[@WaPiTiChAsEr]

Don’t forget 300 RUM, SAUM, Nosler, Norma, Savage, H&H….🤷‍♂️

[@tomlawrence3991]

Win mag and short mag have to be close

[@kc-md8we]

Granted, a great percentage of game is taken at 50 to 100 yds and for that scenario this was a valid test. It just proves that at those distances, the number of cartridges that can be effective is mind boggling. It is when you get out to that 300 yd and beyond that velocity and bullet construction can become a determining factor. Get yourself a decent 308 and repeat the test at 300 yds and beyond if possible and we may have better insight as to what becomes ineffective at the longer distances.

[@LovingIdaho]

When the 6.5 creedmoore started getting popular , lots of my friends bought into the hype . I seen more wounded animals that year than ever before . You dont try long range hunting with a target caliber . They were trying to take down elk and deer at 600-800 yards .

[@hellohowyoudoing]

The 6.5x55 Swede has been used for generations to take Moose, Brown bear and deer sized animals in Europe. It’s not the caliber it’s the bullet construction.

[@sirrloin]

@@Peter-od7op Works just fine if you know the limits of your round...95% of all hunters have no business shooting more than 400 yards. 6.5 will take elk just fine out to that point. Anything farther just get a 6.5 PRC.

[@TechnikMeister2]

My grandad was a DC in what is now Botswana. He was PH right up to 1980. He told me three rules in hunting the big five. 1. They all will try to kill you and you have at best two shots to bring them down. 2. His minimum calibre is a 400 plus, calibre bullet that can deliver over 4000 ft pounds of energy at 50 yards. He carried a H&H 450/400 double rifle with 500gn solids and a Sabi Mauser in 500 Geoffrey. And 3. Most shots against cats will be less than 10 yards. And if you don't peg a hippo or buffalo with the first brain shot, you might not live to tell about it. In his career he was nearly killed twice and he was super cautious. I have his guns now.

[@savmitch1798]

Jim, I'm no ballistics expert, but could the reason for similar depth of penetration be due to the expansion of the projectile from hitting the one inch board? Does the board cause similar expansion of all projectiles? Would shooting only the ballistics gel be a better test for depth of penetration?

[@phild9813]

I’m curious about this too. The pictures of the first bullets looked correctly expanded. I’m sure he did it this way so he didn’t need like 10 blocks to catch bullets. Interesting test nonetheless.

[@joeritter8331]

Thanks for this video. If a few more channels like yours started talking about matching bullet construction to the game being hunted we'd get fewer stupid statements about X caliber being too little/too much. I've heard everything from .243 is to little gun to 7 Mag just punches 7mm holes straight through deer and you'll track them for miles, every statement has a personal or second hand story to back them up. And most wouldn't have been stories if the hunter had chosen an appropriate load. I would expect that a bonded, partition or monolithic solid would have performed much better on that wildebeest.

[@jayklarquist7912]

I’m a firm believer in the nosler partition, or an accubond. The partition has penetrated through an entire mule deer entering through the spine near the rear and exiting through the chest for me and the 35% of the bullet that doesn’t stay together creates multiple small wound channels, making a vitals shot drop them on the spot.

[@Bigfish1day]

Partition here, haven’t tried Accubonds, can’t find anything right now.

[@jayklarquist7912]

@@Bigfish1day Nosler stated on their website that Partition users won't see any benefit from switching to Accubond bullets unless they are more accurate from a particular rifle.

[@Bigfish1day]

@@jayklarquist7912 Thanks for the info but I have no intentions of switching to Accubonds. I believe in if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

[@jeandrew8259]

I'm from South Africa and I have a 6.5 Creedmoor shooting 140gr S&B factory ammo and I'm hunting kudu (around 260lbs size animal) in the neck or heart/lung area with no problem. There where I shoot it is where it falls. I agree with you I think it's about the bullet design and proper shot placement. Thanks for the great video

[@jonathonsissom6655]

I think it would be interesting to see some of the results of using a heavier bullet with a hotter load in the 6.5 prc on big game. I know that there have been a lot of people who have been able to push the 156 grain EOL bullet from berger at over 3,000 fps in the 6.5prc

[@terryslaton5582]

The 150gr. LR Accubond could give a few more inches in the 6.5 PRC!

[@ryanemery7755]

Since we’ve established that penetration is similar with similar bullet construction, the other two factors to strongly consider are: 1. Permanent wound cavity (this is something that multiple ballistic gel tests have shown the 6.5’s lack the .30 caliber bullets in) 2. Energy transferred. While the 6.5 PRC is good in this aspect, the 6.5 creedmoor doesn’t do so well when matched up to say, a .308 shooting a 170 gr or 180 gr bullet.

[@ryansmithza]

Interesting test but I'm wondering what effect the dry wood has on the expansion of the bullets? Did all the bullets in these tests expand as they would in an animal?

[@TechieTard]

Very smart man! Only person I saw call out the obvious. 6.5s have deeper penetration due to it's surface area on contact being thinner. so if the bullet was a solid, non expanding, it would have gone through both gels, at least I know the 6.5 prc would have, I've seen it. Expanding bullets dump all of there energy the second the bullets punctures the first surface it punctures. The guy doesn't know much about ballistics and bullet design.

[@GunTradition]

It made my week seeing your boy make that hit! Super exiting!

[@waltersobchak2973]

I think what you've shown is that (relatively) fragile bullets like the ELD-x aren't the best choice for game that size regardless of the chambering.

[@jward9637]

Your son is a good shot. I shot a good Mule deer in Wy. two years ago with a Federal Premium Barnes TSX 165 gr. Copper Hollow Point bullet at 300 yards. I have to admit I was skeptical of a high velocity hollow point bullet. Not only was the ammo dead on at 300 yards, but the only place that Muley went was straight down with zero meat lost. Copper bullets are the way to go!! The Copper Hollow Point had great mushrooming without sending shards all over the animal. In fact I had zero shards that ruined meat. I immediately bought a custom turret and more of the same ammo. I have a tag this year for the same area, and can't wait!!

[@BadoreksDailys]

A great all around bullet for the 6.5’s is the ABLR. It’s not as tough as an accubond (will expand at lower velocities) but it is still bonded, will hold together better and penetrate deeper than an ELDX (at higher velocities) of course, they’re both great bullets, but I personally like the bonded design for hunting at a wider variety of distances than a cup n core with an “interlock ring” for higher velocity cartridges ( PRC, 26 nos, etc)

[@hersheljackson69]

Hey Backfire, Wooters lethality index truly represents results, it is a simple formula that I truly agree with, it suggest different numbers for different game.

[@chrishenicke2052]

And I was a hunting guide for many yrs. On trophies, shoot bullets like Barnes, Accubond, Nosler Partition and shoot for dead center shoulder. Those bullets will break bones and wreak havoc on vitals. It is hard for an animal to get away when their landing gear don’t work! Behind the shoulder shots end up gut shots more often than not.

[@mikem4011]

Great explanation. I think like you stated at the end, the bullet selection is just as, if not more important than the caliber selection. And shooting a copper bonded bullet for larger game animals (with proper shot placement and within effective ranges) would have provided much more effective terminal performance for the game yall were hunting. Very informative video that provides a lot of data points for us shooters/hunters out here. Love this channel.

[@peterforrestel2558]

I love the approach to this. Great job. I have a 6.5 creedmore and just got back from Wyoming antelope hunting. For those guys, with the high wind and longer shots i had to take, it was perfect. I don't know if i would use it in an elk but on white tail and smaller, it is just right.

[@GeauxTide]

We've had 5 deer run off this year with the Creedmoor with marginal or poor shots. No exits, and very little blood trail. The two I've kiiled in the past couple of years have been with 308 165 Grand Slams, and 7mm 154 Interbonds. The GS cut a 1/2" hole in an out on a high chest shot, and the Interbond hit low in the brisket, breaking the left elbow on the way out. Both were 120-125 yards from a 308 and a 280. I held to low with the 280, as the angle downhill was 30 degrees. The heart and lower lungs were mushed and there was a 3' x 2' spray at each stride. He piled up at 100 yards. I think the issue with any smaller caliber is cup and core bullets on marginal shots. Cup and core bullets are designed to expend everything inside the animals, so placement is vital. A friend shot a buck last year with a 150 Corelokt from his 308, and it ran off. He killed it the next day a mile from the prior day's stand, being chased by coyotes. I'll use standard bullets in my Grendel, 300 HAM'R, and Bushmaster for hogs because they have much lower impact velocities and penetrate better.

[@thomasdaniel6495]

There is a reason why the old rounds of many years ago made their reputations.The 6.5x55 and 6.5x54 (160gr),7x57 (175gr),318(250),and so forth.They were all driving long,heavy for caliber bullets at moderate velocity,and they penetrated better than they should have.Now we have better bullets,as you mentioned when talking about the copper bullets,but the principle is the same.That being said,there are limits to everything,and I think that is where you match caliber to game.Smaller bullets for smaller game,larger bullets for larger game.Its tried and true for many years.Yes,large game can be,and have been taken by small bullets,but be mindful of the game,and give them the respect they are due,use enough bullet to ethically take them down as quickly as possible.There is so much to be said here,that there are books written on the subject,but we just need to use common sense.

[@michaelcerick8954]

For reference, I was in S. Africa last June, shot a Buff with a .416 REM Mag, my other 5 animals were taken with a Christensen Arms MPR in 6.5 PRC. Zebra at 350 yards on the side of a mountain. Dropped in its tracks, rolled downhill 25 yards and came to rest against a tree. Kudu at 90 yards facing straight at me. Dropped in its tracks but took a finishing shot. Eland at 280 yards, ran a short way downhill and collapsed. Impala at 180 yards, dead when it hit the ground. Bushbuck at 245 yards, dropped in its tracks like it was struck by lightning. All shot with my 156 gr. Berger EOL’s at 2,940. FPS. My PH was impressed by the performance of the round. Regards, Mike Cerick