Thanks for the video! In the "word of caution" slide, why is H included in the chart?
@crimsonlofi1753 Жыл бұрын
thank you !
@DeBaccoUniversity Жыл бұрын
You are welcome!
@joclutterbuck64583 жыл бұрын
Thank you, great content!
@DeBaccoUniversity3 жыл бұрын
You are welcome, great comment!
@akisingh58323 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Please upload more soil science numerical videos.
@DeBaccoUniversity3 жыл бұрын
If you search the channel you will hopefully find more quality content on this topic;-) Ex. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fnrHXqKPrcuSfqs
@specfever218 күн бұрын
That's quite an irresponsible statement to say that fertilizer companies use calculated numbers in order to sell higher amounts of fertilizer. What do you think the main reason for using a calculated CEC as opposed to a lab determined CEC is? I think you know. The answer is not to sell more fertilizer.
@DeBaccoUniversity13 күн бұрын
Using this math generates higher amounts of fertilizers than looking at the individual nutrient values.
@specfever212 күн бұрын
@@DeBaccoUniversity If CEC is used in the fertilizer equations, then possibly. The equations I use, for the most part, do not use CEC. I work for a soil lab and I do not sell fertilizer. I may have missed it in your presentation but how much higher do the calculated numbers end up being vs the lab-determined value? I'd say the largest determinant in not using lab-determined CEC is the cost of having it run by the lab. Almost all soil testing labs use a calculated-CEC because of the dangerous solutions that were formerly used in lab-determined CEC analysis.