Bayesian Statistical Analysis using Python - Part 1 | SciPy 2014 | Chris Fonnesbeck

  Рет қаралды 33,769

Enthought

Enthought

10 жыл бұрын

Пікірлер: 13
@Fordance100
@Fordance100 6 жыл бұрын
At 50:06, the way equation was written is not usual. One way to write it is: P(w=1| s1=0, s2=0) = P(s1=0, s2=0|w=1)*P(w=1) / (P(s1=0, s2=0|w=1)*P(w=1) + P(s1=0, s2=0|w=0)*P(w=0) ). The calculation is correct.
@jonathannavarrete3744
@jonathannavarrete3744 7 жыл бұрын
A little theory goes a long way. Finally (introductory) Bayesian theory for the layperson from a real statistician.
@AlfradNobel
@AlfradNobel 9 жыл бұрын
i cant read the notebook. How can i read codes for coal data mining problem ?
@littlerainyone
@littlerainyone 7 жыл бұрын
I was drawn to these videos because I wanted to see what PyMC is doing under the hood, for example, with respect to Gibbs sampling. I was following the presentation just fine until I got to the big messy conditional probability expression for tau, at which point I hit a brick wall. Chris Fonnesbeck indicates you "need to do a little mathematical wrangling" to derive this categorical distribution. Where should I look to find out how the "wrangling" is done? I haven't read Gelman, but I own it, and it is mentioned several times in this conference lecture. Any tips on what I ought to read to understand the details of Gibbs sampling (preferably not entire books) would be much appreciated.
@jonathannavarrete3744
@jonathannavarrete3744 7 жыл бұрын
I'll reply with "MCMC is not easy". If you want to understand Gibbs sampling, you should (briefly) look at Markov chains, and read Casella's paper "Explaining the Gibbs Sampler". It should be noted that Gibbs sampler is just a special version of the general Metropolis-Hastings. If you really want to understand what's going on "under the hood" of MCMC methods then you'll need to beef up on your math (not to be rude). It takes a good level of punishment to really understand some of this material.
@acampoverdeify
@acampoverdeify 7 жыл бұрын
The negative Bernoulli distribution is wrong @56:15, it should be a binomial coefficient, not a ratio.
@jonathannavarrete3744
@jonathannavarrete3744 7 жыл бұрын
For other readers: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_binomial_distribution
@vvd2101
@vvd2101 10 жыл бұрын
I couldn't find the link to material on github. Could somebody post the link ?
@DrBenVincent
@DrBenVincent 10 жыл бұрын
fonnesbeck/scipy2014_tutorial
@vvd2101
@vvd2101 10 жыл бұрын
Ben Vincent Thanks!
ВОДА В СОЛО
00:20
⚡️КАН АНДРЕЙ⚡️
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
Best Toilet Gadgets and #Hacks you must try!!💩💩
00:49
Poly Holy Yow
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Smart Sigma Kid #funny #sigma #comedy
00:40
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Дарю Самокат Скейтеру !
00:42
Vlad Samokatchik
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]
17:38
Welch Labs
Рет қаралды 808 М.
What is a Monad? - Computerphile
21:50
Computerphile
Рет қаралды 598 М.
Allen Downey - Bayesian statistics made simple - PyCon 2016
2:57:24
Introduction to Bayesian data analysis - part 1: What is Bayes?
29:30
Bayes theorem, the geometry of changing beliefs
15:11
3Blue1Brown
Рет қаралды 4,3 МЛН
КРУТОЙ ТЕЛЕФОН
0:16
KINO KAIF
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Лучший браузер!
0:27
Honey Montana
Рет қаралды 363 М.
Как бесплатно замутить iphone 15 pro max
0:59
ЖЕЛЕЗНЫЙ КОРОЛЬ
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Look, this is the 97th generation of the phone?
0:13
Edcers
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН