See Nasa's spectacular new images of Jupiter | BBC Global

[@julittok]

I’m so grateful there’s no annoying reporter interrupting her with a loud and fast-paced voice every 10 seconds.

[@franzschubertv2874]

Annoying music playing while she is talking though.

[@kamuelalee]

Annoying comments during this great BBC broadcast on KZbin.

[@WaveManMike]

@@franzschubertv2874the music is helpful. You need to get this information to a large group of people and most people need music in videos to keep their attention. Something I learned studying video editing.

[@jesus4400]

Space is FAKE and CGI. Wake up!!

[@seth4321]

And in that same, irritating tone of voice with the annoying inflections.

[@yobroh0]

If news were this, I’d watch everyday.

[@oosmanbeekawoo]

Only because there's no space to conquer or money to steal on Jupiter!

[@sagearbor9414]

“If news were this” bro this is literally the news lol

[@mamedeonthedancefloor]

@@sagearbor9414 it's like, if water was H20, I would drink it more.

[@Faruk-mq5ih]

Ztragosm kodom intelgecijeh cisteh svijestih rahzum nasih civilizacijaj milijonimah godinah obracalih solrnogh sunca izvijzdah boguh svijetlostih nebah svijemira ❤🎉😢1973 Ypohd svijestih

[@RichyRich2607]

Who asked?

[@GamerNugget18]

After seeing the news recently, this is a breath of fresh air, i love when people just be people with people

[@thereturnofmang4733]

Where are the stars in the background? Why does the pictures look like CGI? Is it possible that space doesn't exist and everything that NASA, SpaceX & other nations puts out is staged and faked? I know the answer but I'm just seeing if any of you can finally wake up. They are hiding God, heaven and the firmament from you!

[@fattyboombatty7736]

A handful of people make life crap for the rest of us, then you see what the rest of us can do when we work together.

[@kalesmythe]

Movie people are good people

[@doktorzasinuse]

@@kalesmythe what about aliens 👽? Are they cool 😎

[@megancao5988]

Hear hear!!!

[@mrch33sehed93]

Seeing how far we can get into space is one of the only reasons I'd want to live forever.

[@ReiseLukas]

I'd be content with exploring the Solar System or the nearest systems

[@SweBeach2023]

We have really reached as far as we can get. Maybe we will be able to get an unmanned probe to the Oort cloud, but the scientific value of such an expedition would be limited.

[@Mare0912]

Same. And also witnessing what mankind will be doing in general.

[@kolaas2006]

​@@Mare0912we're going to make the planet practically inhabitable in the next 100 years, maybe even decades. In fact we may have already doomed ourselves, we just don't know it yet.

[@fortunateforest]

Same here my friend

[@Monkey-ook-ook]

This reminds me of open source. You should never underestimate the time and effort that people are willing to put into creating something, simply out of passion and curiosity. It's pretty amazing, the only downside being certain other industries that understand this very well and choose to exploit it.

[@AGenerationJones]

When humans cooperate instead of compete, they are capable of greatness.

[@QuasariumX]

I mean, competition shouldn’t be the best way, but we are not perfect. We collaborate and nothing happens, but when there’s a threat, we take action.

[@MicahScottPnD]

Non-zero sum.👍

[@peterwulff469]

- agree but most countries have little or nothing to offer while most of the few that has, are secretive - USA being the most prominent of the few exceptions. So thanks a lot to NASA and the USA.

[@adrianmyles4844]

Pretty sure everything from the rockets to the lens' to the computer imaging were first used for military or spying purposes. Competition breeds innovation much, much faster.

[@facitenonvictimarum]

Profound, warm and fuzzy.

[@or1on89]

Seeing a Scientist doing what they love despite their old age and still being in love with their field of study is so inspiring. I hope, 30 years from now, to be like this.

[@anaysayersyes]

Who is this venerable lady in the video?

[@Blitterbug]

She's a spring chicken mate

[@AlternateUniverse-fb9tn]

What a condescending comment that smacks of ageism and bias.

[@Blitterbug]

@@AlternateUniverse-fb9tn Yah, it's not a good look

[@jogennotsuki]

@@AlternateUniverse-fb9tn Walk us through your thought process... how exactly does your precious brain work to perceive someone complimenting a scientist's passion as ageism and bias? Are you being paid to be offended?

[@Deleted11100]

The storm eye couldn’t look any more like a little galaxy itself. Absolutely unreal what’s out there.

[@Flesh_Wizard]

The universe is fractal in nature. Small things repeat on larger and larger scales, and vice versa

[@Deleted11100]

@ spot on mate. Only have to look at a close up picture of the human eye and it looks like a mini universe.

[@-Nue-]

What a wholesome lady

[@seanlefloch]

I couldn’t help but feel relaxed and relieved watching this short segment. With just 0.3% of the total government budget, NASA scientists can send a probe millions of miles away and capture incredible data and images like this. It’s like giving your kid $100 and telling them to go buy a car, and they come back with a Lamborghini!

[@Duu2]

I love your beautiful simile! Working for a space company, and as a tax payer, I wonder about some of the spends, but the benefits of exploration and planetary defense define our future.

[@neomarioism]

imagine if it was actually invested back into communities

[@seanlefloch]

@ For just $82 per person, we have access to interstellar imagery, groundbreaking science, and technologies that have the potential to better humanity in countless ways. It’s $82 that inspires generations, pushes the boundaries of human knowledge, and often leads to advancements that improve life on Earth. Sure, $82 could buy groceries for a week, but NASA’s work has given us innovations like satellite communications, weather forecasting, and medical technologies-things that benefit everyone far beyond the immediate value of a week’s groceries. It’s an investment in the future, not just a temporary fix.

[@nic.k]

@@neomarioismyes that $82/person would make a humongous difference on homeless everywhere in the country. They’d be able to easily afford one day worth of fentanyl each, providing a vast and wide ranging economic impact on drug dealers everywhere! Wow, marvelous.

[@theorangecandle]

What the hell does looking at pretty pictures of Jupiter achieve for science.

[@Mr.1.i]

the most striking picture of jupiter i have ever seen

[@kennydude7971]

It's not a picture, they said, " processed information " to create images. FAKE!

[@nzuckman]

@@kennydude7971 literally every picture taken with any digital camera is processed to make an image. 🙄

[@Mr.1.i]

@kennydude7971 please don't be an annoying person

[@RetNemmoc555]

@@kennydude7971 Night-vision technology processes information. Is what you see though night-vision goggles fake?

[@BigBoaby-sg1yo]

Ooooooh ! What’s not to believe ? 😂😂😂😂

[@Neilhuny]

Stunning results by some extremely talented people

[@jbartmontage6737]

Great artists 😉

[@Rederz12]

​@@jbartmontage6737 just say you are uneducated.

[@jbartmontage6737]

@Rederz12 sure, pro vaxer educated 😂

[@jesus4400]

Good photoshop talents

[@MrScaramoosh]

Yes, Walt Disney studios again.

[@SS-zr7cv]

Ah finally some news on the progression of our species and not the devolution of war hate and politics - refreshing

[@Rattus-Norvegicus]

Don't worry, it won't be long before space exploration is politicized and countries are dividing up mineral rights on Jupiter's moons, etc.

[@SS-zr7cv]

@ lol ikr sigh

[@romyaz1713]

forgot religion

[@SS-zr7cv]

@@romyaz1713 I did lol thanks, no joke

[@unlimited8410]

@@romyaz1713 Yes, the necessary secularist complaining about religion, while conveniently forgetting they are responsible for the deadliest wars

[@real_kokon]

Thank you to all the great scientists out there

[@Deus-Vult472]

Artist impression

[@chrave1956]

Thankyou for having the Courage ❤

[@Ang3lUki]

No they sent a real camera there and took a picture, then sent it back.

[@Nothing_Nothing485]

Blimey looks like a Van Gogh starry night …😂❤

[@dedgzus6808]

the

[@evonne315]

Something about the mathematics of how gases swirl that makes your comment both true and scientifically prove-able. Van Gogh observed the phenomenon long before math could explain the patterning.

[@happytravelersjournal]

Same first impression!

[@davewilson9738]

I saw it the minute the image emerged!

[@DarkRoomAmbience]

Art imitates life, then life imitates art and round in circles we go. Like mirrors placed opposite one another, their reflections cascade into infinity, each one birthing the next. We are both the creators and the created, the poets and the poems, the actors and the script. In this endless loop, there is no beginning, no end...only the ceaseless, shimmering interplay of form and formlessness. Art imitates life, life imitates art and round in circles we go

[@benmcreynolds8581]

Community based research and science is the best thing. I love it

[@kamuelalee]

Except for the unscientific part...exagerated colors of Jupiter, egads!

[@mkvv5687]

@@kamuelalee Yeah, my first thought. My second thought was that these pictures would be incredibly boring and we'd see very few features without enhancement and modification. The contrasts and colors chosen for different elements allow for new insights into the data.

[@jesus4400]

Space is a HOAX. Wake up!!

[@kamuelalee]

@@mkvv5687 Yes, I understand that. People wants to see bright colors on other worlds -- like they do in Star Wars or Star Trek -- but it's unscientific -- read inaccurate -- to randomly pic random colors for another planet. IMVHO

[@willwunsche6940]

​​@@kamuelalee Digitally enhancing contrast to see detail is one of the oldest tricks in the book and actually useful for analysis in some cases. So it actually can have some use scientifically in certain situations even if most of it is just for fun and to look pretty.

[@jeffreysokal7264]

This makes total sense; I quite often have to blow out exposure, sharpening, saturation to tell what I am looking at in my macro and wildlife photography. The resultant photos may not be beautiful images but they allow me to identify what it is I saw.

[@TragoudistrosMPH]

Where did you learn to do that? I'm less than a beginner in photography, But I converted a camera into full spectrum and can take Infrared and UV photos. Trouble is, I never learned to edit photos 😅 (Bought a camera for a younger cousin and accidentally ended up with two, and couldn't return the extra.)

[@crytilz]

@@TragoudistrosMPH Just get photoshop, legally or not... and start messing around with the settings, You'll learn.

[@danvartan]

I’m more amazed by the scientist than by the pictures of Jupiter. What beautiful and thoughtful work!

[@perentee77]

This just shows the leaps humanity can make when we share knowledge rather then limiting that knowledge to certain corporations.

[@jasonmarmor4683]

Awesome! It's a wonderful idea to have citizen scientists involved - the amateur astronomer community is an amazing resource, capable of new insights, discoveries and data collection. Bravo.

[@dnakatomiuk]

Jupiter is my fave planet of our solar system, it has been since I was 6 and I'm 41. The aww of it, the size of it, the red spot, the satellites its captured etc and how it protected the Earth a few times

[@tito-kr7rm]

weird

[@anaguma90]

Same man, it's awe inspiring and also kind of terrifying. It's this unfathomably massive wall of swirling chaos and like a little solar system unto itself. Compare to Uranus which is just featureless!

[@jjnix95]

@@anaguma90 Er most people say it's warm and tight actually!!!!

[@anaguma90]

@@jjnix95 very original

[@DewlayLomo]

Dropping loads all over the milky way!!!

[@opwave79]

I remember following the Juno mission as best I could with my underpowered PC. I remember NASA asking for fixed up photos. It’s so nice to see the pics again with my better powered PC, lol.

[@hiddenguy67]

wdym

[@wompstopm123]

thats crazy how old the scientist in charge of the mission is, they launched it back in 2011 and it just recently got there. you have to plan so far ahead to get to jupiter

[@joaquinbarreto9398]

So in other words we still don’t really know what Jupiter looks like. It’s all super enhanced by software just like the rest of any image you come across from space. Interesting.

[@chistopherr7536]

You conspiracy theorists really love hearing exactly what you want to hear. The images are processed by the general public (not NASA) using the raw images so most images you see are not going to have accurate colour but will have better contrast so you can make out more detail than the original. All of that was explained in the video you clearly didn’t watch. Look up “Junocam raw images” if you want to find some originals.

[@Killbayne]

if I took a picture of you and turned up the contrast a bit to make image better, does that mean we don't know what you look like despite having your face in the picture?

[@ordieloved]

They didn't just turn up saturation.. look up true color pictures of Jupiter looks nothing like this. It looks dull brown. This picture shows wavelengths the human eye can't see

[@Xiroi87]

Scientific value aside, those images are absolutely beautiful. Some areas look like cells in acrylic pours. Amazing.

[@MicahScottPnD]

Well, think about acrylic pours. Perhaps that's something that's happening on Jupiter, the process or principle could be exactly the same. Maybe it's just pouring from below to the surface where we can see it. An observation like yours might contain true scientific value, no kiddng.❤

[@ivan4087]

Iits all grey but scientist ad colors to make it more enertainig to us mere people aww

[@magikarp653]

Well, there is no scientific value to begin with.

[@craaab____721]

@@magikarp653 how so?

[@ordieloved]

A true color picture of Jupiter looks nothing like this. It's actually dull brown. This video shows enhanced wavelengths the human eye can't see

[@johnmilovich2195]

These photos are works of art.

[@Mark-j9d8r]

Beautiful. Just like acrylic pouring and mixing.

[@theAlchemistJ_33]

That’s just Amazing. Thats what true Art looks like

[@tglizzy]

i’ve been able to see jupiter, mars & venus in the night sky recently, it feels awesome being able to look out and see our neighbors

[@MelanieFromCanada]

She said exactly what I've been saying... Jupiter is a work of art ❤

[@cyclistman6358]

IMO, the existence and acknowledgment of art, implies and typically requires an Artist.

[@bullyboy131]

It's full of violence.

[@kennydude7971]

Processing information to "create" images. So, cgi. Got it.

[@nzuckman]

@@kennydude7971 by that logic, any digital photo you've ever seen or taken counts as cgi

[@nzuckman]

@@cyclistman6358 the universe itself is the ultimate artist 😌

[@jorymil]

It's so amazing that these are public-processed images: individual raw images on their own do not contain a ton of information, but stacked and processed, they're a revelation. I'm getting involved!

[@lajoswinkler]

No, they do contain all of the information. These are artworks that are not scientific in nature.

[@mikewilson8513]

I shoot only RAW images on my Nikon doing general photography. Raw files are the equivalent of a digital negative. The reason I dont shoot Jpeg is because the RAW file contains so much more information. They do have to be processed in a program like Adobe lightroom or photoshop, otherwise they are useless.

[@MicahScottPnD]

Super interesting. I come out of the old school, so it's really helpful to hear what's transferring from film to digital in terms of image capture and rendering. Thanks for the comment!

[@furycorp]

@@mikewilson8513 To add to your explanation, in case anyone is curious to learn more, the technical term is "lossy"; as in JPEG is a compression algorithm that inherently loses information. JPEG is also susceptible to "compression artifacts" -- it was designed for photography and these artifacts can be really obvious on larger expanses of the same/similar colours, so it is an especially poor choice of format for graphics like charts or logos. On the other side of the coin there are "lossless" compression algorithms. JPEG is still widely used and is a standard web format however over the decades much more advanced compression techniques have been developed.

[@One.Zero.One101]

It's actually the opposite. The reason they shoot black and white is it contains more hi-res. All the information is already there, the colorization process just makes things easier to see.

[@jasondoust4935]

I have a friend who is a scientific photographer. He scored a trip aboard the Australian research vessel Investigator, travelling to Antarctica. During the trip, he manipulated some digital images for his own collection as scenery shots and another scientist asked how he managed to capture a gas phenomenon in an image. It turns out that sometimes Photoshop let's you see things that your eyes cannot. The information was in the image, and digital manipulation made it obvious. Similar things here, no doubt.

[@lajoswinkler]

Yes, eyes can not see these things, but it's being published as if it's the visually real thing. That is a problem.

[@andromedaspark2241]

I agree the exaggeration could create a false impression, but our human eyes are limited to a narrow band of the spectrum and also give a limited, not entirely real perspective. Photo manipulation to catch what our eyes normally cannot is valid.

[@Djamonja]

​@@lajoswinkler I don't think it's a problem really, people should understand that all these images are created/enhanced because you can't use a normal camera for these images. The people that don't understand this can just look at some nice images and enjoy them.

[@dmystify1381]

its not photoshop,it does'nt matter what editing program he used....it is the sensor...the sensor sees' more than the human eye....this is Fact.

[@BigBoaby-sg1yo]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@prosurfaholic5121]

what a cool space grandma

[@rainbow72878]

Listening to her voice sharing her knowledge is wonderful. This is really refreshing.

[@Pennysam]

What can be achieved by communities is awesome 🤩

[@louisegogel7973]

❤❤❤❤❤

[@BrendaHeld]

Beautiful colors! Something that's ONCE in a lifetime to see! THANKS for creating the JUNO CAM, so people could enjoy the beautiful planets out in our universe!❤

[@awemanyfit]

Jupiter is so so beautiful, beautiful planet

[@wallacegrommet3479]

Right, it was blurry and some artist made it pretty, not science, it's art class

[@moshymosh]

Is that really what's going on?

[@ordieloved]

Yes that's really what's going on. Pictures that show true color as we humans would see it show it as a boring brown

[@haroldbeck4351]

@@ordieloved the false color allows people to see real atmospheric processes that were previously missed.

[@ordieloved]

People also want to see what it would look like to our eyes... You can show both

[@haroldbeck4351]

Yes, you can show both. But showing both wasn’t the point. You’re simply nitpicking.

[@davepaez2019]

NASA needs more funding

[@Sawdust6666]

Why bother when starmer tells us daily we have a 22 billion pound black hole? How much more do we need to spend on them?

[@j.ceasar]

@@Sawdust6666 You arent spending a lot on them. 22 billion is pocket change for the country.

[@denniswilson9185]

You mean more money to waste, man will never get past the firmament God made sure of that

[@davepaez2019]

@denniswilson9185 god isn't real nor is his magic glass orb. Get out of that cult

[@JJs_playground]

Those images are gorgeous.

[@RichardLaurence]

Amazing images - and citizen science at its finest!

[@MovmentOf4B_moab]

Thank you BBC for this short documentary, passionating. Healing.

[@Deedee-ee1sg]

Stunning photos of the iconic Jupiter.

[@gumrick5982]

god bless her and everyone involved in this great job

[@trebell885]

Love & respect growing up wit BBC 59yrs+ 98% responsible 4mi engineering degrees.

[@y_fam_goeglyd]

Those images are absolutely stunning! We're lucky to have some beautiful planets in our system and people clever enough to look at them.

[@NiallConlon-ox1jf]

Still fake tho 😂 you sheep 🐑 beleive everything its comical

[@kenesys8713]

​@NiallConlon-ox1jf where's your source

[@ordieloved]

It's fake. Enhanced to show colors that the human eyes can't see. Look up a true color picture. That shows what we would see. Dull brown

[@riffmeisterkl]

Knowledge is meant to be shared. We’re better together when we don’t keep it all to ourselves

[@louisegogel7973]

Truly!!!

[@Iam_mahesh]

💯 ❤

[@JohZs77]

Commented under USA space program channel…

[@j.ceasar]

Hard disagree. No competition means no incentive to continue.

[@aprilpower1158]

@@JohZs77 Do they keep the knowledge to themselves?

[@Fabr1kat0r]

It's nice to see grandma still working from her seniors home.

[@HinduSpartan]

Technology paired with human innovation. Fantastic.

[@ExistentialExperienceMusic]

Wow, Jupiter's visuals are breathtaking! It's like looking at a masterpiece that's constantly evolving. The scale and the dynamic nature of these storms are mind-blowing. Kudos to NASA for capturing such beauty, even if some argue about the authenticity or the enhancement of colors. It's art, science, and a bit of mystery all rolled into one. Let's appreciate the effort and the beauty of our universe!

[@oldcrow6990]

You're so lucky to work on this! Thank you for all you do.

[@jamestregler1584]

By Jupiter ; lovely 😃

[@robyn7165]

“A work of art” 1:44 Space Art 2:41

[@ravenspromise4925]

these images...are actually breathtaking

[@annm4833]

This is fascinating and beautiful! Thank you all for sharing it with us! 🪐✨☺️

[@matthewhenson2421]

Fascinating.❤❤

[@louisegogel7973]

Working together we inspire each other to greater levels of creative thinking! This is a wonderful example of that principle!

[@rebellionofindia43]

So proud of our progress as a human we are doing Best wishes from India

[@keithtarrier4558]

Thank you to all the staff/crew/people who made Juno possible. LOVE IT! The future is what we make it!

[@richardblair919]

Really inspirational for all.

[@gerardskippon3099]

Amazing, absolutely amazing.

[@Altheya878]

My standing applause to this cooperative work❤ Prossesed images are breathtaking

[@dianewilliams1125]

Looks like a Van Gough painting! Beautiful! 😊😊😊

[@CelestialSyntax-r2x1c]

As a citizen of Jupiter I admire humans efforts.

[@venvedam]

Great work by all the beautiful minds out there, kudos 🎉

[@hjordistorfa]

This is truely just Spectacular.. and Juno Spacecraft is as well.. Thank you kindly Candice for sharing this Magnifik information with us all.. Greetings from Skandinavia 💞🇮🇸😊✌️💞

[@marianorubio9578]

Incredible! Hooray for science!

[@publics.public]

Thanks to everyone concerned with this project including the BBC for publicising it further.

[@gangsterboy3664]

This is the most beautiful thing I’ve ever seen of space! 😵‍💫🫨

[@zapfanzapfan]

By Jove, that is amazing!

[@gabemate]

stunning.

[@SondaPower]

I am generating similar results in the Image AI. Which AI did they use?

[@Mare0912]

Publishing the data and actually caring for the response of the community is a really great way to push science forward!

[@qunngiaqti]

Van Gogh would have a field day with these photos.

[@stephenetridge2584]

Looks like an oil painting

[@Alexandragon1]

Awesome!

[@mattyounce2486]

The detail revealed in color saturation from citizens gets to the possibility of what one would encounter in extra solar exploration from a geological perspective of walking or floating on distant planets, the challenges of space travel only reinforce efforts of a civilization albeit not even a type one, to coordinate and cooperate with everyone so someday the lucky few will have a chance to experience the sights and sounds of celestial bodies that are beyond the vail of interstellar space.

[@Agamon]

These are the people who deserve to be our super stars.

[@akhizulfaqar4370]

I find it quite perplexing how telescopes are capable of observing objects at such vast distances, while the features on planets like Uranus and Neptune remain beyond our observational reach. anyone can explain?

[@CDee-if9og]

Yep,it's all CGI bollocks.

[@hatti...]

Because they're really far away. Extremely far away. Planets like Mars and Jupiter are several times closer which makes them easier to see. Saturn is the farthest planet that can be seen with the naked eye fairly easily, but Uranus and especially Neptune are much harder to spot and you'll need a telescope.

[@BigBangTheoryIsALie]

Jupiter is one hell of a scary place to live on 😂

[@Langkowski]

2:10 The largest and oldest planet in our solar system? Yes, it is the largest, but is it also the oldest? Where did that come from?

[@bobbydigital8056]

It may be the largest due to it being in the part of the original accretion disk to start condensing first hence it also being the oldest. Just spitballing.

[@MrSlanderer]

​@@bobbydigital8056 They weren't questioning it being the largest, but how they figured it's the oldest.

[@bobbydigital8056]

@MrSlanderer And I offered up a solution to the question. Read it again.

[@MrSlanderer]

@@bobbydigital8056 Never mind, my mistake!

[@changedlife1904]

Finally some real news

[@peacekeepermoe]

real news of fake photos

[@peterphilipsen8136]

Or fake? We dont know

[@X-Prime123]

Breathtaking. It's my favorite planet outside of ours, as it's the first one I saw through a telescope, which happened to be my own telescope too.

[@Scotiancoast]

The sheer power there must be in the wind currents is mind boggling.

[@JackV-n3c]

people should not be desecrating the true appearance of the planets!

[@deathlybadger7192]

The amount of comments on here calling the images fake, denying Jupiter’s existence and saying the earth is flat is genuinely alarming.

[@TheNudeBrewer]

I mean, look who America elected president. Does it really surprise you? The entire Republican party is the political equivalent of a flat-earther. lol

[@Wet_Fungus]

@@TheNudeBrewertrue haha

[@ReiseLukas]

​@@TheNudeBrewer that's right, keep calling the common man uneducated idiots. Worked so well for you guys so far😂

[@KorbinX]

Welcome to the anti-science movement of the last 2000 years. You can thank religion for that

[@dalton8082]

Grow a brain cell

[@TulaneAve]

The difference in intellect and thought between this lady (and her NASA associates) and the average American is beyond measure. Gives me hope and also terrifies me.

[@-Asmae_]

haven't you seen the flat earthers in this comment section

[@conspiracy1914]

@@-Asmae_ what did they do?

[@zoRkilla]

Outsourcing the compilation to the community is really cricket cool

[@DulaniAsha]

Wow that's beautiful

[@JBaxter-pi8oj]

Citizen science has very real benefits and this proves the point. Where people have an interest they will participate. In the past they've been kept out by mere academic snobbery but that's only limited the amount of intelligence and talent that will open our eyes to far more wonders than we've ever allowed ourselves to experience before. Thank you for sharing this. Keep up the great work!

[@coloradochris3952]

I believe everything NASA says

[@bernecomp]

Finally, a fellow American I can feel proud of.

🤢

[@shesaidsomething1]

Science is absolutely the best thing.

[@oakmonster2164]

We use to have a channel dedicated to this stuff! Love her explanations and open mindedness! EDIT: Killer soundtrack

[@lazerrhino]

So many bots and people who dont understand photo science in this comment section

[@tdcfc]

Well, yeah. Flerf going "nuh uh, cgi, ai, nasa lies" is way easier than understanding what any of those words mean.

[@KorbinX]

​@@tdcfcyup.

[@ordieloved]

This is not true color as we humans would see it. Try again

[@writenamehere0000]

Does anyone trust BBC anymore?

[@Hurricane1668]

Its nice that us Americans can depend on the BBC for thoughtful, intelligent news.

[@michaelfitzpatrick6307]

Holy fk.....really...???....wow....u nasa believers are more Gullible than COVID fks.

[@imjustsaying2769]

She is as fascinating as Jupiter, at that age she still her marbles. Thank you for your contributions to science world

[@7eamGhast]

Whats the difference between an Image and a Photo?