What is Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution? - BBC World Service

[@BBCWorldService]

Click here to subscribe to our channel 👉🏽 bbc.in/3VyyriM

[@MyLifeOfficial]

The visuals in these and other similar episodes recently are so good... Clean, engaging, informative... Lovely

[@BBCWorldService]

Thanks for watching and for your comment. We've got more coming so make sure to subscribe!

[@ronlacker326]

@@BBCWorldService Yo BBC, why do you hate white British people so much?

[@santanuchatterjee9722]

Very precise and informative. Explains in simple words for all to comprehend with equally easy examples and visuals. Thank you BBC.

[@RechtmanDon]

The aspect of natural selection that is missing in this video is the one that is not obvious to many people: the resulting adaptation applies to a species, not to individuals. Thus some would argue that it is ok if we have pollution; we as individuals just have to adapt to it. What they miss is that it is likely that most of us will not individually adapt and instead will die. The few who do survive the pollution, may or may not have a genetic distinction that allows them to handle the pollution, and if they do, they may or may not pass it on to their offspring. Evolution is a game of chance, usually taking place over hundreds, thousands, or millions of years, and some of our human-made environmental changes such as plastic, global warming, etc. far surpass the typical timeframes necessary for a species such as ourselves to successfully adapt.

[@caloricphlogistonandthelum4008]

Sorry, mate, you need to do more reading because your understanding is a bit wrong.

[@RechtmanDon]

@@caloricphlogistonandthelum4008 I appreciate your detailed and concise response--oh wait, no substance! Please elaborate, like I did...

[@caloricphlogistonandthelum4008]

@@RechtmanDon Okay, assh*le, 'The few who do survive the pollution, may or may not have a genetic distinction' - wrong. The individuals absolutely have a genetic distinction (a mutation in their jerm-line DNA) which provides them with an advantage and can be passed on to their offspring, otherwise it's just dumb luck.

[@DJWESG1]

They don't mention that the idea was already prevalent in all of society or that he he stole his idea. Instead they quote Malthus, another fascist hellbent on killing the lower class

[@helenamcginty4920]

You can generally dismiss any comment addressing you as 'mate'. And you are correct. Thats why short lived creatures such as Drosophila melanogaster are used. Of course the colour change by the peppered moth to dark camoflage in the soot laden industrial revolution and back to light after the UK clean air act came into force is a prime example of evolution.

[@isatousarr7044]

Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution posits that species evolve over time through natural selection. This process involves individuals with heritable traits better suited to their environment being more likely to survive and reproduce. Over generations, these advantageous traits become more common, leading to gradual changes and the emergence of new species.

[@Karthik-ut3vo]

That fly i was thought really moving on my mobile screen 😂😂😂

[@SonnyDarvish]

Love pattern recognition, observation and bird's eye (no pun intended) view of the world. Darwin probably was also quite an interesting person to talk to.

[@danielwhyatt3278]

Interesting person to talk to is probably a very big understatement indeed when referring to Darwin. LOL. You could probably get lost in talking to him for hours and never get bored of it.👌🏼

[@mohamedsalem6014]

Interestingly enough Al Jahez, an Arab scientist born in the 8th century Basra, Iraq said the following: Animals are engaged in a continuous struggle for survival and resources, and that environmental factors causes animals to change and evolve new characteristics becoming over generations new species altogether.

[@UhrBushaltestelle]

And it was already written in the Quran 200 million years ago 😂

[@YoutubeVagabond]

It's not about West vs Arabia. Does anyone from Arabia or Iraq even accept Al Jahez or even Darwinism which is very advanced version? They are still stuck in 7th century beliefs.

[@oduorodipo5850]

​@@UhrBushaltestelle😂😂😂

[@azmainfaiak8111]

so even the middle-age arab also thought Adam and eve story was nonsensical right???

[@praveenmallikarjunaiah7613]

Hindu god Vishnu incarnations also support theory of natural selection . You may have to give up Allah and instead embrace Vishnu - if you really want to respect and accept late darwin and his theory. Gross weapon like mace and lso fine cutting rotating disc, bipedalism knowledge and what not you can get ? So it's either Vishnu or become atheist and all the terrorism related events will be stopped.

[@B0bby1122]

Loved this video, I thought it was a new one though. it's just a repost from 4 years ago from the other BBC channel

[@MrRobertFarr]

❤interesting that you spotted that. If you are right. What channel was it ?❤ There was also a prophesy of a Devilish Box. Confusing everyone. In The Bible also ! ❤

[@B0bby1122]

@@MrRobertFarr Its from the "BBC news" channel. Search "BBC news evolution" it should pop up.

[@valray1284]

Gotta say the editing of this video is amazing really elevates the information

[@o84naturalista]

i'm convinced by the evidences of the theory of evolution. Great video and contents!

[@VibeSphere-007]

Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection is a groundbreaking concept that explains how species adapt and change over time. It suggests that organisms with traits better suited to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce, passing those advantageous traits to future generations. Over millions of years, this process leads to the evolution of new species. It's fascinating how this simple yet profound idea reshaped our understanding of life on Earth!

[@qowalapundit]

The edit was awesome! Thanks to the guys who worked on it for hours.

[@RonanGallagherBand]

The Church displayed a keen sense of adaptation by accepting Darwin's irrefutable theories were compatible with their faith, thus retaining their market. 😁

[@NguyễnNgọcQuangTrường]

This video is so cool. Thank you for this valuable source of scientific knowledge.

[@deemaze4832]

What a beautiful presentation , with simple and interesting way , thank you bbc once again for these like content ❤

[@przemekchojnacki947]

2:04 p

[@bobbyjunk2433]

Animations & explanation 👏🏻👏🏻

[@michaelreed4744]

It seems that Darwin observed variations of species. You can see these traits in many species. For instance, many vertebrates are made in similar designs. The creation of many species on Earth can be compared to people making breeds of animals and varieties of plants. They are made after their own kind, not by any transitional forms.

[@jaimetorres950]

Why do religions still exist?

[@adrianthom2073]

Because we are an ignorant species

[@SonnyDarvish]

2 major reasons: Fake hope and inducing fear.

[@kierenmoore3236]

Freud in The Future of an Illusion said that religion is likely to persist, so long as humans remain afraid of death … which is likely to be a while, yet … 😏

[@simplelight1]

Buddhism is a major world religion but it is non-theistic, so it does not rely on creationism.

[@ciiccci]

I think it has some pros too. Some religions unite millions of peoples . Look at Israel Palestine problem. It don't need to be good or bad .

[@lukorito1670]

the visuals are extremely convincing. excellent presentation

[@LindaengelustrupBlogspot]

I think kindness could be an adaptive, positive trait. But it is interesting why siblings can turn out so different from eachother

[@darylwilliams7883]

There has been a ton of progress in the understanding of evolution in the last half-century, but the idea of natural selection is still the fundamental basis of it, thanks to Darwin. Natural selection plays out in more complicated ways than Darwin ever imagined, but the fundamental principle of competition for limited resources leading to selection of favoured individuals remains strong, in fact a law of nature really.

[@rajsunder635]

Very well presented. Thank you for the enlightenment. R. Sunder, Canada

[@roniaguiardonascimento7157]

The BBC videos are the best

[@duyminh8685]

Omg the transition so stunning🎉 😢

[@mzatijohnjnrmataya2795]

Interesting stuff

[@trenfa4371]

came here for darwin amazed by video editing

[@johnnolang3734]

It wasn't Charles Darwin that proposed the theory of "evolution". His grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, had proposed that 75 years before Charles and considered all form of life as related. A number of other scholars of the time also accepted EVOLUTION of species. They just didn't know what drove it. Charles was quite clear in the title of his work, "On the Origin of Species by Means of NATURAL SELECTION, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life."

[@Jesus1255-z8y]

I am an Antitheist Atheist I do not believe in the existence of God. There is no evidence to support the belief in any gods or supernatural entities. I rely on science, reason, logic, and empirical evidence to form my worldview and have not found compelling evidence or arguments to support the existence of God. The universe is governed by natural laws and forces, rather than moral, spiritual, or supernatural ones. As an atheist, I reject religious dogma, supernaturalism, and superstition as the basis of morality and decision-making. I emphasize the social and empirical nature of inquiry and prioritize scientific solutions to intellectual problems. There is an intrinsic intellectual conflict between faith and science, and that it inevitably leads to hostility. I am engaged in a continually evolving search for truth, primarily through science and philosophy.

[@SteveLomas-k6k]

I agree with all your methods, I was raised an antitheist atheist, but became increasingly skeptical of it later in life using the same approach. It doesn't have to lead to hostility, I'm not an 'anti-atheist'- Good, intelligent, people can disagree, don't you think?

[@boeingpameesha9550]

My sincere thanks for sharing it.

[@AnticancerSmart]

Great video!

[@Mohammed-dy2hm]

It is intriguing how she ended the video by affirming the veracity of the theory!

[@tnductai]

5:06 evolution is a fact is not true, it's still a theory with many challenges that contradict

[@bilal535]

Do you know what a scientific theory is? What are these challenges?

[@tnductai]

@@bilal535 of course i do, theory cannot be proven, evidents can only support it (even gravity, which many people see as fact, is still a theory because according to Einstein, gravity is not a force). Back to evolution, you can look up things that challenge evoluation theory, to name a few: no fossil records of in-between species, no explanation of the very first origin of species, the complexity of cells to be able to change their functions from 1 species to the next is very closed to 0%. Darwinism does explain well micro-evolution (adaptation to the change in habitat), but not the whole evolution.

[@fresh-eggs]

​@@tnductaiThere's no credible evidence to show or support a God being in existence anywhere in reality.

[@matteomastrodomenico1231]

​@@tnductai You can also look up how none of these things go against the theory.

[@tnductai]

@@fresh-eggs as a scientist myself, i believe more in evolution theory, but i'm saying that the theory is not a fact as there are many holes are yet to be filled

[@kumaragurusubramanian581]

There are also genetic drift, sexual selection which are important aspects of evolution.

[@kmonsense8716]

It is crucial to precise that Darwin did not address the problem of the origin of life. Although evolution is an observable fact, we must tell the public that Darwin himself still believed in the immaterial origin of life. This is what he says in the last edition of his book, the one published in 1872. In the last chapter, with the last sentence, Darwin says the following as the closing statement of his book: “There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone circling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved.” Anyone can grab a copy and check it by himself. Darwin didn't deny the immaterial origin of life.

[@thethruthchannel]

What creature is currently evidencing a state of evolution?

[@kmonsense8716]

@@thethruthchannel The creative energy that creates the universe and life within it does not operate by magic. Evolution is the best mechanism to describe the living world. Not Darwinian evolution because the real mechanism of evolution is a conscious and governed phenomenon. Evolution is not random. It is directed.

[@thethruthchannel]

@@kmonsense8716 you used the word energy. The law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed...You have to explain the origin and intelligent purpose of matter that makes up the Physical and Non-Physical stuff, only God existing can explain that

[@kmonsense8716]

@@thethruthchannel God is energy. The creative energy that generates the material universe and life within it is called God. God is just a label. That unknown energy is a thinking field; that's why some people call it mind. Others call it consciousness. Mathematically, we find it in Einstein's famous equation E=MC2. How people call it does not matter. Energy=God=Consciousness=Holy Spirit.... The trick of life is that it maps consciousness into subjective reality in living organisms. Life is energy, but it also acts as a function.

[@fresh-eggs]

​@@thethruthchannelAgain there's no credible evidence to show or support a God in existence anywhere in reality.

[@maheshnevase9650]

Music is not good

[@sameer8]

👏 🎉 For the people who made this video Precise

[@thom4smueller]

Was this theory awarded with the Nobel prize?

[@misterfunnybones]

Creation museum has one answer to all questions: god.😂 (and stop asking questions...)

[@deolihp]

Brilliant animation

[@ianwilson8759]

Thanks, good show. I have one issue with this presentation: rather than Homo neanderthalensis being swallowed up and merging with Homo sapiens, what if it was the other way around or in fact completely chaotic. What if homo neanderthalensis genes were "not fit" in comparison with homo sapien genes and were gradually selected out over time. Recent research proposes that we may be 10-20% neanderthal or an even higher % because there has been a gradual eradication of less fit neanderthal genes, which now shows up as 1-3%.

[@TheBhumbak]

Make this in all possible language

[@joskabouw]

And the only constant is CHANGE for the better

[@user-en1zc5vd6y]

And where did the “ancestor” come from?

[@misterfunnybones]

It's all chemistry. Using God to explain complicated ideas is pure laziness & ignorance.

[@marioreds7826]

We ultimately come from fish. But if we want to go even further, we all descend from unicellular life forms. And there is a branch of biology, called abiogenesis, which studies how the simplest life forms originated from non-living matter. There is enough stuff accessible for free on the internet for anyone to understand how it worked.

[@salimadiyo9442]

@@misterfunnybones Total Bs,the extreme perfections in nature proves to God.The moment you drift from the God concept the more questions come

[@willbeville9193]

⁠​⁠@@salimadiyo9442you’ve sort of proved @misterfunnybones point there. U cba to deal with the questions, so instead just attribute it to god

[@misterfunnybones]

@@salimadiyo9442 I am ignorant; therefore, god. 🤣

[@baraskparas9559]

Natural selection works for cells and molecules within cells. A new book published by Austin Macauley Publishers titled From Chemistry to Life on Earth outlines abiogenesis in great detail with a solution to the evolution of the genetic code and the ribosome as well as the cell in general using 290 references, 50 illustrations and several information tables with a proposed molecular natural selection formula with a worked example for ATP.

[@caloricphlogistonandthelum4008]

It's not 'Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution' it's just the Theory of evolution - and you'll notice I've capitalised Theory, that's for a reason.

[@kamoliddinrasulov5283]

Muslims believe that the first human, Adam, was created in a unique form, distinct from any primate. Those who follow Darwin's theory may choose to see themselves as descendants of monkeys, but our belief differs. 😅0:13

[@bilal535]

So you just ignore what the science says?

[@kamoliddinrasulov5283]

@@bilal535 Darwin’s theory is not the only one in science, there’re plenty of different theories that match our belief

[@fresh-eggs]

​@@kamoliddinrasulov5283I live on the Caribbean island of Barbados 🇧🇧. Islam was created around the year 610 C.E

[@bilal535]

​@@kamoliddinrasulov5283but when it goes against your belief then you ignore it? Also there are muslims who accept evolution.

[@veracold5736]

​@@bilal535наука просто описывает то что видит, но не объясняет, как зародилась жизнь. Мы должны просто принять это на веру : зародилась и всё тут. Аминь!

[@fireworxz]

Thanks Darwin

[@TheGuggo]

Why so much animation and sudden sounds? I can think that people can’t focus and their attention must be strongly and continuously stimulated. Anyway, a good short documentary otherwise.

[@leponpon6935]

Humanity is at an impass, where adaptation is deliberately and artificially made no longer possible.

[@kidmohair8151]

now. if only the regressives hadn't glommed onto something Darwin never said, survival of the fittest, and then use that non-quote to justify might over right, we could all sleep easier.

[@AdvaiticOneness1]

I think im too early to read comments from triggered Abrahamics.😂😂😂

[@lordvenom4419]

Allah 😂😂 brought Adam and Eve. Dinosaur is nothing. Earth is flat. There is nothing big bang.

[@blazer9547]

Hindus also believe in creation, what did Brahma do?

[@blazer9547]

Karma isn't real, reincarnation isn't real. Ayurveda is pseudoscience. Ramsetu is a natural formation, not built by ram( he's fictional) How about these truths hindu?

[@AdvaiticOneness1]

@@blazer9547 What does creation has to do with Evolution? Lol

[@MrRobertFarr]

Yes and most people are still acting like they were created and actually. For most practical purposes. You might as well have been created . And the rest of my thoughts are a Trade Secret !

[@UhrBushaltestelle]

😂😂

[@ahmetemin7572]

the title says theory, the conclusion says fact

[@bear3406]

The comments are insane. People should read: On The Origins of Species before you spew your pre-formed opinion. Or read his journal entries. Darwin simply expanded on already existing concepts. His biggest flaw was he was born and raised in the West. I am a Westerner as well, so this isn't meant as a slur, however, us Westerners have a very linear view point. This limits our understanding of literally everything. I am not the authority on this subject, but one thing I keep in mind that helps me process complex information; I always keep in mind our universe was born out of two opposing forces. To a human, all this really means, is we need to remember to have perspective or the patience to understand why perspective is crucial for a species to survive. It isn't about Darwin being right or wrong, its more about *can we use this technology or knowledge to truly advance our species and other species. Think of Einstein and Newton. Einstein didn't *replace* Newton's theory, he simply modified it.

[@patmugambo7929]

There's nothing like evolution

[@ronlacker326]

NOthing like the racism that Darwin produced.

[@caloricphlogistonandthelum4008]

You're so dumb.

[@chiboy_speaks]

What a bigoted statement

[@fresh-eggs]

​​​@@ronlacker326Slavery and racism started long before Charles Darwin was around. I live on the Caribbean island of Barbados 🇧🇧. Barbados 🇧🇧 was one of the main western colonies where African slaves were first brought starting around the 1600's

[@ronlacker326]

@@fresh-eggs TLDR. Point is, Darwin and his theories were rooted in racism. Disagree? You're a racist.

[@JoyTothesummer]

Evolution does not in any way disprove the existence of a creator God 😂

[@fresh-eggs]

There's no credible evidence to show or support a God in existence anywhere in reality.

[@JoyTothesummer]

@@fresh-eggs actually there is. All depends on what you consider credible evidence. Objective morality is evidence. Design in nature is evidence. Eyewitnesses accounts in the Bible is evidence

[@bilal535]

​@@JoyTothesummerwhat makes you think there is objective morality? Design that we see in nature doesn't necessarily show that there is a conscious designer that designed it. We have natural processes but you may ask where did they come from and all I can say is I don't know.

[@fresh-eggs]

​​@@JoyTothesummerI don't accept your flawed explanation of 'Look at the trees' as any credible evidence for a God. So what's your next move??

[@fresh-eggs]

​@@JoyTothesummerI view the Bible as an unethical book.

[@containedhurricane]

Abrahamic religion adherents: Humans didn't evolve from monkeys! There was no human before Adam!

[@thethruthchannel]

Believing that one is a monkey's descendant is wildly pathetic😅. We are fearfully and wonderfully made, and with clear purpose and destiny, not just a random collection of carbon waiting for WEF to destroy.

[@bamboozled8955]

Lies!

[@joelharris4399]

Currently reading the fantastic book, "Every Living Thing: The Great and Deadly Race to Know All Life" (2024) by Jason Roberts. Charles Darwin is greatly indebted to the groundbreaking work of the French aristocrat George-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon in formulating his theory of evolution. De Buffon also helped lay the foundation for what would later be known as genetics and climate change.

[@IAmStevenLubega]

I am a health scientist, but I still believe in creation! I've read and studied the evidence of evolution and natural selection, and I have come to the same conclusion over and over again, that it requires more faith to believe in evolution (due to the so many missing links) than to believe in the creation theory! I however don't impose my beliefs on anyone. Everybody got his own choice, and that should be respected, especially by those who don't hold the same view of matters.

[@fresh-eggs]

There's no credible evidence to show or support a God being in existence anywhere in reality.

[@jimblack8104]

This still doesn’t prove evolution of species one species turning into another species. This is just adaptation.

[@GiantROBLOXvor]

What do you define as a species? A species is a category of animals that can produce biologically viable offspring. Two animals that are unable to produce viable offspring may be considered different species. Speciation (the process of more and more species appearing, as well as species going extinct) is literally evidence of evolution and natural selection at work.

[@patmugambo7929]

​@@GiantROBLOXvor you are just stupid

[@PhrontDoor]

We have literally observed numerous instances of speciation events -- one species becoming another species. All you had to try was 'observed speciation events' in google.

[@seanquinn2476]

The accumulative effect of adaptation over millions of years results in the changes you’re expecting.

[@addersrinseandclean]

Spot on micro evolution Yes macro evolution NO

[@philo5923]

Peace, lower, or get rid of the music. It takes so much from your presentation..

[@porkbanhmi]

What created the process? What created the creator?

[@chiboy_speaks]

I guess we’ll never know

[@shabeyum]

Old story, collapsed theory.😅

[@sm3289m]

The biggest funny thing on earth😅

[@إسماعيل-ج6ح]

I recommend listening to Dr. Haitham Talat and Dr. Iyad Al-Qunaibi. They have wonderful episodes that expose the myth of evolution and discuss many other important issues. Unfortunately, their content is only in Arabic, but there is automatic translation on the episodes presented. I recommend listening to their episodes, especially in response to atheists and their failed myths, such as the myth of evolution.

[@bhngrmk3137]

Science & Religion - both labels are an attempt to answer the most pressing and fundamental questions, albeit from opposite ends. Both labels run the risk of presenting an exclusively human-centric worldview by dissecting what is otherwise an infinite continuum (consciousness/energy field) into narrow slices, zooming in on those slices, and proclaiming that that slice is the only reality relevant or worth exploring. Both approaches have their strengths and limitations. I think the inclusion of the word "God" into the spiritual lexicon is defeatist and dissuades the younger generation from exploring metaphysical notions, as that word conjures up an image of an exclusively humanoid entity, typically male, and having an affinity for some planet, species, gender, geographical region, race of people, language, culture, etc. Instead it might be more productive for spiritual notions to be framed in scientific terms, as E = M (divine energy manifesting as all that is), an underlying homogeneous consciousness/energy field manifested as the heterogeneous/diverse cosmos that is observed. Like the number 0 remaining in a non-judgmental equilibrium state by manifesting as infinity (experiencing existence from all vantage points; as matter/anti-matter, as both the victor and the vanquished, as both the hunter and the hunted, as things and their contradictions). "Yahweh/Jehovah" is not a proper noun but rather a description of a state (I am, that which is), similar to the Sanskrit "Tat Tvam Asi" (Thou art that).

[@ReadJohn1421]

John 14:21-23 ESV Whoever has my commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves me. And he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him and manifest myself to him." [22] Judas (not Iscariot) said to him, "Lord, how is it that you will manifest yourself to us, and not to the world?" [23] Jesus answered him, "If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him.

[@mdrahman-ju9qv]

Who told you everything is happening without any higher power sustaining all the animals?

[@triumph.over.shipwreck]

Has it occurred to you how insanely sadistic that "higher power" would be if that were the case?

[@nicoak571]

Still did not explain the origin of species.

[@rodmarker2071]

Did you watch the vid ?

[@PhrontDoor]

Actually, it does. It doesn't address the origin of life, but the origin of any known species is explained.

[@ArranVid]

Evolution is a scientific fact, and the Hinduism God is real.

[@C.Mawia_]

Charles darwin theory hma daih khan lei leh van,Pathian khan in alo siam tawh a,siamtu awmlo vin engmah a chhuak theilo,Kan Pathian chu Chatuan mi,a bul leh atawn ani a,chhut pawh atullove.Nikhat pawh kumsangkhat,kumsangkhat pawh nikhat ah adah thei.

[@derekspitz9225]

I assume this is for children? Or is it just the BBC dumbing down again. smh

[@eagleswings5693]

We preach the crucified Christ which is foolishness to this world but the power of God.

[@Sergiu-]

Amen brother!

[@fresh-eggs]

There's no credible evidence to show or support a God in existence anywhere in reality.

[@fresh-eggs]

​@@Sergiu-There's no credible evidence to show or support a God in existence anywhere in reality.

[@thefisherking78]

Something more people need to be educated about, here in the 21st @#$& century

[@churabhok2869]

And that ladies and gentlemen eventually fueled the world wars 🙂

[@rickrandom6734]

It is so sad. Before Darwin there were no wars.

[@somarmahmoud4339]

Natural selection is not a bulletproof theory and there must be a sublime Creator of the origin of matter in the universe , with all respect and love 😊.

[@samantarmaxammadsaciid5156]

Yes, the natural selection is the proof of The Sublime Creator of all: Allaah < Al-İlaah. If not the natural selection, how to explain that in this Unnamed Earth in this world or this universe, or called in the Qur’aan (Al-Ḥayaatu) Ad-Dunyaa = the Lower / the Nearer (Life), selectively İslaam starts with İbraahiim and through his elder son İsmaaᶜiil was established Kaᶜbat in Bakkat / Makkat that concluded as a complete with Rasuulu-LLaahi and Nabii’u-LLaahi Muḥammad ﷺ through his Lisaan (= Tongue / Language, out of all the humanity’s languages) was transmitted Allaah’s creation (Al-Qur’aan, expressed one-to-one in the midst of / selection of) the natural evolution (self-contained processes of formation and its adaptive transformation). = the Duality. Aadam’s creation by Allaah in Named Earth with the feminine noun Al-Jannat, who is one dual representative symbolism of the entirety of Allaah’s creation, and once lowered back as a result of İbliis refusing Allaah’s command to Al-Malaa’ikat (collective feminine noun - and each masculine noun Al-Malak - as representative symbolism of the As-Samaawaat = the Skies / the Heavens, plural of As-Samaa’ = the Sky / the Heaven) to prostrate to Aadam (created from Al-Arḍ = the Earth Al-Jannat), and once İbliis puts his threat to action and Aadam obeyed then Aadam was split into two separate bodies of male and female, and as result all three of them collapsed into forming this Ad-Dunyaa of the plurality and diversity. Hence, humanity (part of animals of the earthy living creatures) is the point of the natural selection of the natural evolution. Allaah’s creation is expression of the İslaam as final selection of what Allaah had already expressed globally; as the Creator to the selected and related individuals amongst their communities as the representative of Allaah’s creation in this Ad-Dunyaa corresponding to Aadam created in Earth Al-Jannat.

[@aosaeanor]

Darwin's bs !

[@KabulHull]

Evolution made me leave Islam

[@rjclue2630]

He had enormous mental issues and his favourite was to kill the tortoise and eat the meat. Or turtle. 😊

[@HolloMatlala1]

Anon….

[@DoNotAddDeduct]

We must all believe that there is above us from all. Our powerful God from heavens in the bible even the super advance tech country in the world cant handle a strong event like a powerful storm, earthquake, tsunami etc. Even the US if they are hit the powerful earthquake in history. This is to show how powerful he is coming from heavens and mentioned in the bible. Do not add or deduct his holy words.

[@fireworxz]

Faith doesn't equate evidence

[@solapowsj25]

The environment is as much a part of the evolution we study. Intelligent Design.

[@oneone7522]

I never came out of monkeys, sorry I disagree with evolution.

[@matteomastrodomenico1231]

Doesn't matter, the facts can't be changed

[@bilal535]

Evolution doesn't teach we came from monkeys.

[@oneone7522]

Educate me then if there is no monkey somewhere on the genetic tree of mankind

[@bilal535]

@@oneone7522 we share a common ancestor with monkeys. Chimpanzees are our closest living relatives. If you want to understand this better, then you can find lectures on yt, there are plenty of yt channels who will explain this much better than me.

[@kopisanger.]

At present time, man had explored the space while monkeys still hanging on the trees. And how many more millenia those monkeys will have our current progress? 🤭😁😁

[@zainic]

There are still ppl that label this fact as Satanist's theory 😂 to forget god

[@bonggayvillaroman2087]

I’m not an intellectual, but I don’t think I can accept the fact that I came from a monkey, just the same as all the other species that God created. Well that’s just me.

[@fresh-eggs]

There's no credible evidence to show or support a God in existence anywhere in reality.

[@bilal535]

What's your issue with accepting that?

[@bilal535]

@@fresh-eggs I asked him this question. But to come to your point, it would depend on what you mean by evidence. Is there scientific evidence? Ofc not. Can we prove ot through philosophy? Myb.

[@fresh-eggs]

​@@bilal535 Well you need to @ the person you are speaking to. It's very easy to do. I thought you were speaking to me.

[@triumph.over.shipwreck]

Well, you definitely validated your initial statement.

[@hakknight]

Total bullshit about humans

[@bilal535]

Why?

[@fresh-eggs]

@hakknight There's no credible evidence to show or support a God in existence anywhere in reality.

[@chrisgriffiths2533]

Certainly Darwin is One of the Luckiest Humans Ever to Live. He gets the Opportunity to See the Natural World Like No One Ever before and Only a Very Few Since. No One from about the Year 1900 Forwards has Seen Earth Life Like Darwin. It's Very Important to Realise Darwin Knows Little of Earth Life before His Big Journey. In My View, Darwin's Amazing View of the Life Clouds His Judgement. Darwin Gets Stuck on Similarities Without Fully Realising :- All Life on Earth is Earth Life. Hence Similarities are a Certainty and Very Very Large in Number. Therefore Only when You Test Darwin's Key Point do You See the Similarity Dilemmas. Example One :- Humans Approximately 70% Water. Oranges Approximately 70% Water. But Clearly, Despite 70% IDENTICAL No Evolution Link between Oranges and Humans Except Mother Earth. What's Darwin/Dawkins Explanation ?. Example Two :- Nearly All Animal Life has a Degree of Consciousness. Except Humans Clearly are the ONLY LIFE with Advanced Consciousness. Why Would Just One Animal of Billions of Animals have Advanced Consciousness. What's Darwin/Dawkins Explanation of the UNIQUE, ONE ONLY Profound Human Consciousness ?. EXAMPLE THREE :- 99.9999999% of All Land Life Including Humans has been Destroyed by Natural Causes over Billions/Millions of Years. Factually the only Reason We Find Ancient Life Evidence at the Bottom of Oceans or In Caves is because these Location Protect the Remains. Hence Darwin and Dawkins are Ignoring this Cruel HUGE NUMBER OF MISSING FACTS from Our Past. UPDATE EXAMPLE FOUR :- The Evolution STEP PROBLEM or CHICKEN AND EGG PROBLEM. How does Evolution Theory Explain FLIGHT in So Many Birds. The Very Obvious Evolution Theory Problem with Flight is How Could Any Animal Survive Enough Attempts at Flight to Allow Enough Time for Feathers to Form ?. Simply Put HUGE FAILURE PROBLEM with the Evolution Step Needed to Create FEATHERS FOR FLIGHT. Hence To Me, Darwin's Theory is Very Interesting but Not Science Fact.

[@matteomastrodomenico1231]

Except all life does have a common ancestor, including humans and oranges.

[@UhrBushaltestelle]

Here for creationists who want to cry in the comment section.

[@patmugambo7929]

If evolution is true ,were does dinosaurs come into the equation...

[@rodmarker2071]

Figure it out for yourself by watching the vid and then a bit of google - it's lazy to expect to be spoon fed

[@patmugambo7929]

@@rodmarker2071 there's nothing in the video ..just gibberish without proof

[@rodmarker2071]

@@patmugambo7929 If you want to remain ignorant it is your choice . Try google .. Im done

[@weareparamore1597]

From eves rib I think

[@lordvenom4419]

​@@patmugambo7929don't borther, you read your black book 5 times a day. 😂😂😂

[@mthajuk4163]

So when Darwin was waiting for irrefutable evidence, he published his work quickly to not lose his credit. As per the theory, Evolution is a mechanism. What could be the primary cause behind this Mechanism ?

[@PureLuck719]

As a population goes from generation to generation. changes to the genes in their heritable DNA accumulate causing the population to change over time.

[@thethruthchannel]

Adaptation is NOT evolution.

[@bamboozled8955]

Yes it is. Adaptation over millions of years may drastically change species, which is in fact, evolution

[@thethruthchannel]

@@bamboozled8955 Which species are we currently with that is halfway in its evolution?

[@bamboozled8955]

@@thethruthchannel literally all of them? But if you want evolution that happened super fast: look up the finches studied on Daphne Major island as an example

[@matteomastrodomenico1231]

@@thethruthchannel Everyone

[@thethruthchannel]

@@matteomastrodomenico1231 So why do we have apes with humans around?

[@OnlineMD]

FACT: Alfred Russel Wallace was the FIRST to come up with the theory of evolution. But he didn't have Darwin's clout, money or connections. Hence Darwin simply "jumped on the bandwagon" and was NOT the first originator of the theory of Evolution. As the video states, the two were going to make a joint presentation, but Darwin's EGO prevailed; he just brushed Wallace aside and claimed to be the sole originator of the theory. So his theory wasn't "Naturally Selected," it was created by his ego.

[@matteomastrodomenico1231]

You say that as if Darwin and Wallace weren't still friends.

[@OnlineMD]

@@matteomastrodomenico1231 yes Darwin was a great friend who stabbed Wallace in the back...

[@matteomastrodomenico1231]

@@OnlineMD Not really

[@rana_360]

Darwin: you came from monkey Me : LMAO ! 🤣 topnotch weed story . when someone in his LSD mode 😅 . lunatic crazy human being

[@bilal535]

What?

[@rana_360]

@@bilal535 🙄🙄

[@bilal535]

​@@rana_360do you understand what evolution is?

[@rana_360]

@@bilal535 🙄🙄 ! explain sirrr!

[@user-fed-yum]

Blasphemy! There's no selection involved; chaos, circumstances, perhaps. Next you'll be telling us that Aristarchus posited that the earth rotates around the sun.

[@PhrontDoor]

Those greek trouble-makers... SPARTA!!!!

[@veracold5736]

Люди всегда хотели летать, но крылья так и не развили, несмотря на эволюцию и на безумное желание. Почему -то.

[@vesuvandoppelganger]

What is Charles Darwin's theory of evolution? An imaginary, fictional process by which random changes in the nucleotide base sequence in the genome of an animal leads to new species and morphological forms.

[@matteomastrodomenico1231]

Which is something that we know happens

[@adriennefried5368]

So how did the big bang occur???

[@new_skyspirit]

Let me guess, you're religious 😅

[@theverbalremedy]

Follow the scientific method and we may or may not get an answer to that one. We already have a reasonable grasp and the fact that you know the 2 words 'big bang' means that at least you have acknowledged that such an event very likely occured in the long distant past. You're certainly not going to find answers to scientific and existential questions in a book written by totally unqualified people thousands of years ago.

[@eamonnw]

space is fake and gay

[@adrianthom2073]

Big bang has nothing to do with Evolution. We currently do not what happened before the Big Bang or what caused it. Because we do not know, you can not insert your god as the answer.

[@the_luggage]

Don't confuse evolution with OoL (Origin of Life), they are separate.

[@richiewalsh309]

Utter tripe.

[@salimadiyo9442]

To believe evolution is a failed attempt to escape the irresistibly obvious, which is God.Once you accept God exists many questions cease to come.The moment you avoid God AS concept,more questions arise than you can answer

[@fresh-eggs]

There's no credible evidence to show or support a God in existence anywhere in reality.

[@salimadiyo9442]

@@fresh-eggs isnt thats the reason why ''BELIEVERS'' and ''PARADISE and HELL'' exist? THE WHOLE POINT IS FOR YOU TO USE YOUR HEAD TO BECOME A BELIEVER.Any credible evidence for God surrounds you every time in the form of extreme perfections around about you,but you choose to ignore it.Thats not Gods fault but yours.

[@fresh-eggs]

@@salimadiyo9442 I am a 53 year old lifelong Atheist living on the Caribbean island of Barbados 🇧🇧

[@fresh-eggs]

@@salimadiyo9442OK I am trying to understand your initial comment.

[@fresh-eggs]

@@salimadiyo9442 I am trying to understand your comment. Was your initial comment a statement of quote??

[@junaidvally6898]

its more adaptaion than evolution - the primordial soup story is ridculous

[@matteomastrodomenico1231]

Evolution IS about adaptation.

[@kpchirakkil]

“Created by God” theory is ridiculous 😂