BBR @ IWA 2023 - EP 2. Swarovski Optik - NL Pure Binoculars

[@78thThunderbird]

Thank you Jason for enabling an insight view behind the curtain. Please keep those reviews coming. I highly appreciate your commitment!

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Thanks for the comment and support, and yes, there are a bunch more videos from the IWA show to come as well as a whole lot I have planned to do this year and on into the future.

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

My Full Swarovski NL Pure 8x32 Binocular Review on BBR www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Swarovski-NL-Pure-8x32-Binoculars-Review-300.htm

[@JpMotoVlogz]

The best, detailed and enjoyable to watch binocular reviews 👍👍👍

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Glad you enjoyed it and thanks very much for the feedback - much appreciated

[@TimpTim]

A bit late here, but want to say that I really enjoy and appreciate your videos and the thorough research behind each of them. I've purchased, based on your reviews, and am enlightened (and tempted, lol) by them often! VERY well done and far superior to any others I have seen. Thank you.

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Thanks for the kind words and the feedback - it is Much appreciated.

[@jimp9351]

I just ordered my Swarovski 8x32 NL Pure. I can feel how excited you are about yours and I am excited I have ordered mine!!

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Hi Jim - ogh yes - I have the package and will begin testing them this week - when do yours arrive and which configuration did you get? I would be interested to know what you think once you have had a chance to play with them

[@jimp9351]

@@Bestbinocularsreviews I have placed 50% down and expect to pay it off in a couple weeks. 8x32 Green NL Pure!

[@Jonathantuba]

@@Bestbinocularsreviewswill the review be out soon?

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Hi Yes - it is finally up! - sorry for the delay! www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Swarovski-NL-Pure-8x32-Binoculars-Review-300.htm

[@Regimeta]

Great to hear you finally managed to arrange a copy to review! Looking forward to it. I got my 8x32 NL Pures in orange about a year ago, and been loving them since. I got a good deal and bought them even though I had just got Hawke Frontier ED X 8x42s less than a year ago to upgrade from my old Frontier EDs. I dig the FoV, the sleek design and ergonomics of the NLs and I find the picture much sharper compared to the ED X. I had difficulties choosing between the 32 and the 42, given all my earlier binos have been 42s, but nowadays find the 32s better for my use. The ED X still perform great, but are mostly used by my girlfriend when birding together. One minor complaint I have about the NLs is that they really do fog up externally with quick temperature changes. I haven't found it an issue so far and only experienced it a few times. By the way, I think it was your review of the old original Hawke EDs that I based my first purchase on all those years ago. Thank you for that.

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Hi there, yes it is good news for sure . Also many thanks for the feedback, it is interesting about the fogging up - I will be sure to try and test that out.

[@jakebrake8980]

I use the forehead rest on 8x32 and 12x42. There is, for me, no reason to not use the forehead rest. The shape of the NL (both 32 and 42) is now part of my hand. Despite the ocean full of complainers (especially BirdForum), I enjoy the use of these NLs fully, very happy with my purchase.

[@mrirurfkjsdo]

No, I think you're wrong here, Jake, about 'BirdForum'... there aren't more people there than anywhere else who don't like the NL Pure design... it's a forum with obviously a huge amount of discussions about binoculars, and among these, of course, divided opinions... no more, no less. And to be objective, if you see an 'ocean of complaints', surely see an ocean of praise and enchantment too !

[@Hvitkinn]

I own a 10x42 NL Pure and a 8,5x42 EL. The NL Pure suffers from external fogging on the ocular lenses because they removed the Swarodur coating because that contained harmful substances for the environment…bad idea plus the binocular suffers from glare when sunlight comes in low in front of you and from the sides. 2 things which should not occur in this price range. The EL did not come with a nice fieldbag which they used to do but with a lousy white cotton cheap bag without protection. I called my local dealer to asked if he had forgotten to include the fieldbag in the box but he said it was Swarovski who do not longer provide the fieldbag. So i had to buy a separate Swarovski fieldbag for about 75€… i am a really Swarovski fan but now they are heading in the wrong direction sadly😢

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Hi Ton, many thanks for your really interesting observations - I will certainly keep them in mind when I next test the NL Pure and their other products in the future. BTW, I had a look at your channel - your digiscoping is truly superb and I look forward to seeing more of your content in the future.

[@tonesmith909]

I wish you would test the 12x42! That is the pair that I would buy. I purchased some GPO 12.5x50s that are arriving this week based on your review. If they dont blow my socks off the way looking through the Vortex UHDs did first time I looked through them, back they go! I am a hunter btw, “Western hunter” as they say nowadays… Ultimately I’ll just save a little more and splurge on the NL’s if they arent significantly better than my Steiner predators. It was hard too hide your excitement during this interview, you were gushing lol 😭😭👍😂

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Hi - Just to let you know, I have just received the test pair of NL's from Swarovski - they decided to send me the *x32 - so not the 12x42 that you wanted, but I am sure it will still make for a great test and once I have finished this one, I will ask for the 42mm version and yes, will probably ask for the 12x version - so watch this space! :-)

[@Adventure-MTB]

Hello do you know when you will be getting the NL's for review , and letting us see? Thanks

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Hi Robert - I actually have a pair with me right now - I am currently testing them - Initial thoughts up soon and then the full review - promise. :-)

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Hi Robert, my Full Review is now up on BBR: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Swarovski-NL-Pure-8x32-Binoculars-Review-300.htm - sorry for the delay - long story!

[@Latitude2010]

Pls when are u reviewing the NL 12X42 or the NL 10X42 ???

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Hi, Not sure if you have seen, but I have full reviewed the Swarovski NL Pure 8x32 Binoculars www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Swarovski-NL-Pure-8x32-Binoculars-Review-300.htm - as for the 12x42 or 10x42 - I would love to - just need to get Swarovski to send me a pair. I am trying, but nothing in the pipeline at the moment, sorry.

[@mark22c]

did they have anything to say about the biodegradable armour? its a question id loved to have heard you ask.

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Hi Mark, no that was not mentioned. Indeed it is news to me - where did you read or learn about it - i would very much like to investigate further. - I am currently testing a pair of Sawovski NLs and the review will be up in the next month or so, so would be good to include that info.

[@不死原飴羽]

I have hard time to choose between 8x32 or 8x42 for NL Pure, I do use my binoculars in twilight and dust but mostly on daytime, Im wondering does the brightness different is huge on those scenarios for me to take the weight and price penalty. I see your websites recommending x32 tho

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

In good light, the brightness difference will not be noticeable - it is in very low light that the larger lenses and exit pupil on the 8x42 will make the difference. So if you often need low light capabilities, the extra size and weight may be worth it. If however you mostly use your bins in good light, then a more compact lighter device may be the better option for you.

[@ericharvey9456]

Did they tell you to keep the ones going to your office, test them, then give them away to some lucky person who commented on here. 🙂

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Haha I wish! Swarovski are usually pretty strict with their samples and so far all I have tested have had to go back.. but if they do offer it, I will certainly add your name to the hat.

[@lukas7417]

I absolutely love my 10x42 NL Pure's. Also bought the head rest but for me that was a waste of money. I really don't notice any difference at all. If you have steady hands you surely don't need this overpriced piece of plastic on there.

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

I have the package from Swarovski and will begin testing them this week - Am not sure if they included the head rest or not though ...

[@mrirurfkjsdo]

I have a pair of NL's which are absolutely fantastic, no doubt about it... But in my opinion, it's pure 'vulture' trade on Swarovski's part not to supply this FRP with the binoculars !!!! SHAME ON THEM for the price they sell it separately... at the price of these binoculars, it's rapacious robbery to ask their customers this money for this little piece of plastic !!! (almost 160€ !!!) This is mercantilism pushed to its highest point !!

[@Bestbinocularsreviews]

Hi - many thanks for the comment and your feedback. Yes, from my initial thoughts and like you, when you take into account the price of the NL's you cant help feel they should be included, especially as they help make their product even better, so I do side with you on this at the moment. However, before making my final judgment on it, I will do some more research and consider production costs etc - I will certainly cover in my full review - so keep an eye out!