Beautiful Blazor UI Everywhere with Telerik

[@davestuart2677]

Brilliant video! It was so helpful!

[@polyth0n]

Pretty funny to see Visual Studio for Mac being used in a demo, just when the announcement for the retirement of it was released :)

[@datSpookyDude]

Would really like to see an official template that reflects the layout of the "BlazorEverywhere" solution from this video

[@BloodHaZaRd666]

Any chance to be able to download the code shown in this presentation?

[@alexbramwell1870]

I really wish we had an option to choose SCSS out the box. Just saying!

[@JohanVisser-sq1ng]

I hope that they can do the same for other component sets too. (Syncfusion, DevExpress, etc.)

[@discodisco360]

So everything is prefixed with , does not look beautiful to me at all, to long and annoying, just clutter in the code, which is already not the best one to look at, Syncfusion simply does Sf, easy and short...

[@nandyabhijit]

I am an old man.

[@douglas_dev1]

"Beautiful Blazor UI" all made with css and js in the background so then blazor goes there and claim "no JS" lol

[@Qrzychu92]

it's like saying "python is not python", because the interpreter is written in C. Blazor is an abstraction, same as C# or Python, it gets the job done. The abstraction itself is written in a lower lever tool, what's the problem?

[@douglas_dev1]

@@Qrzychu92 but in this case you dont need to open the interpreter and custom the code....where in blazor, you will end doing your own components with js and reusing it unless if you buy the license for all those already js mad components... where I am going to create a custom modal here with bootstrap and js and will show you my new "no js" component for blazor... lol

[@Qrzychu92]

@@douglas_dev1 not really :P most of the things you can do in JS you can already do in Blazor, every year more and more APIs are available from C#. Some are still not there, so you have to use JS for that. Telerik created their component libarary right in the begininning of Blazor, so probably they had to sprinkle quite a bit of JS into them. At work we use Vue.js and in our project there is absolutely nothing we couldn't do in plain Blazor that we do in Vue - we don't have 3d things, we don't have maps (even though that's already possible), we just spit out some html and css. I'm not sure where you are coming from with this "you need so much js that it's js not blazor"

[@Arahimx]

First Comment