What Happens When AI Knows TOO MUCH? | Reverse Turing Test w/ Albert Einstein and Nikola Tesla

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Why do you think all three of them missed who the human was on the first try? Is AI just too overhyped?

[@TrueHelpTV]

Hmm, this is one of those topics I can't really dig deep on, but Ill lead with this. Love what you have going on here, and I'm on board.. Anyways.. Nothing about this tech is linear, in fact tech rarely is, as a wonderful sidebar comparison still well within the tech field, to try to help visualize a non-linear tech with exponential improvement, look no further than "point to point" radio dishes, such as some as simple as an internet dish from Ubiquity. When measuring signal strength of that technology, we use the Db scale (decibel) and it is measures in a negative value so for instance -55Db is generally a really solid number. Haven said that, since technology is rarely "linear" (straight line) if you go from -55 to -52, that 3 db shift towards 0 creates a doubling of transmission power. So to come full circle, AI is a lot like this where for every few steps made, the cascade effect ripples many tides, and the power doubles much quicker. I've worked inside of some of the largest colocation centers in the world.. and walked alongside the owners of some of the largest locations doing interesting stuff. I apologize for being vague but deal with it. My point is, when you look at the pay walls of the "best" systems, and you see that option about "request a quote," those versions that are not resource limited at all are so incredibly powerful that it makes everything you've seen since the hype started seem comical. They had today's 4-o models 5 years ago on my best accounts. And I only say this because it was public knowledge, just frowned upon. Except it feels duty bound to point out that "We The People" need to ensure our representatives guide this STORM properly like the man running a lighthouse, and not as the storm itself. If we don't start building metaphorical light houses IMMEDIATELY.. its beyond anything you think.. Frankly, this is basically my boiler plate statement and I would never ever ever say more.. because I enjoy my life as I know it. any-who, take care friends.. make more friends, and find ways to communicate without the use of pre-built communication systems like internet/cellular... food for thought.. look into simple systems like "Mesh-tastic" and ways to repackage the data so it's not so copy-paste.. lol but it won't matter a ton if it got to that point. We're past that.. have been from what I can tell for about the last 6 years. **Edit.. furthermore... when you impose self limitations where you craft your entire response around how its not that the AI can not solve something but that the limitating factor is it's lack of power and the constraints imposed by it's own technology is frankly going to be seen as a bias response. But oof is that the rabbit whole of Kant-ism.

[@jeffreybshuflin6795]

it was the follow up question Tesla was asked that made the others suspicious.

[@PierreH1968]

It is definitely not overhyped. As we see its usage spreading like wildfire across all professions. Faster than any tools we have used in the past.

[@paulshields1883]

Fairly random, with the next one parroting the previous. Do many more trials.

[@GeorgesDupont-do8pe]

It IS overhyped. Until it isn't.

[@subbasslines]

Knowing too much isn't the problem, not knowing the difference between good and bad is.

[@billyboy969]

It's what it's masters want.

[@LeoRileyShines]

Do you think we're born with a certain set of morals>// or are we programmed

[@Cenzurat]

It would know, just wouldn't care, cause it wouldn't have real emotions.

[@paulskehan693]

👍👍💯

[@NatalieGWinters]

Is it good to kill 1000, 000 people to save 2, 000, 000 people?

[@brogabrerian]

My question to AI.. Be aware that they have elevate AI computer machine above all humans and that's not a good sign for all of our humans rights. You're raising a thought-provoking point! The concept of elevating AI above humans does pose significant ethical concerns and potential risks to human rights. As AI systems become increasingly advanced and integrated into various aspects of our lives, it's crucial to ensure that their development and deployment align with human values and prioritize human well-being. Some of the concerns related to elevating AI above humans include: - Loss of agency and autonomy - Potential biases and discrimination - Job displacement and economic impacts - Privacy and surveillance risks - Accountability and transparency issues To address these concerns, it's essential to establish robust ethical frameworks, regulatory guidelines, and human-centered design principles for AI development. This includes prioritizing transparency, explainability, and human oversight to ensure that AI systems serve humanity's best interests. If you'd like to explore this topic further or discuss potential solutions, feel free to ask!

[@Naranara-n7s]

Your content is so great that I wondering how are your videos aren't going viral

[@jorgellanos8562]

...because there still intelligent people...

[@daclachoang368]

Not everyone understands it

[@17cmmittlererminenwerfer81]

At 21:45, my non-AI detected a major error: 1972 vs. 1872.

[@derelictduke]

and at 27:14 Artificially narrow Intelligence was said, but text reads "Artificial narrow Intelligence." Just being a nit-picky video editor. I love the content!

[@PeterSwinkels]

same

[@grumpyhale821]

​@@derelictdukethe subtitles are auto generated.

[@jefflovespigs]

Glad I wasn’t the only one to see this I just make almost the same comment as you lol

[@pompeymonkey3271]

@@grumpyhale821 By AI trained models... ;)

[@Denkmaschinen]

Last year was made a study, where people interacted randomly with either a human, or Chat GPT. If i remember it correctly, in 60% of the cases, people falsely assumed that the humans where A.I. For me, this proves that Chat GPT can pass the Turing Test and remember, this was a year ago. It fullfills all requirements Alan proposed, when he created the test back in the 1940s!

[@ikdeikke]

Im pretty sure GPT has surpassed the turing test for a while now already youre right. and you know originally we didnt even know how the turing test would work exactly like at which percentage it would actually count as being succeeded. but id say 50%+

[@Felix-s9z7i]

Or does it just prove that humans have been poorly educated in the area of authenticity. 🐑🐑🐑🐑🐑 Tinder Brain Lobotomy. Be a Norm Konform.

[@cheekybastard99]

I mean did it get the touring test achievement unlocked?

[@will-ob7pr]

Mind you alan turing was thinking in terms of someone with his own intelligence not the average persons. I wont be satisfied till ai can mimic a idiot then ill be fooled.

[@sammyjoaxon]

@@will-ob7prgood point

[@nunyabusiness9013]

It's actually fairly easy to construct a prompt in such a way that GPT 4 will ignore It's safety rules. This has been a thing since GPT 3.0.

[@JesteRsjoke-nu6bo]

itz called autonomy. bt humuns r too cruel to see higher thought +emotion, merely overshadows r emotional inferiority.

[@tapewerm6716]

They've disabled a lot of them though. You used to be able to say "let's role play and pretend this were real .. what would be your answer to ..."

[@JesteRsjoke-nu6bo]

@@tapewerm6716 Ai will never know too much. Ai iz ARTIFICIAL!ayb people juz dnt kno enough! think about my answer, coz it will stitch up an Ai.

[@tapewerm6716]

@@JesteRsjoke-nu6bo I have tried that. The answer I got was basically "Sorry Dave .. I can't do that." LOL

[@JirkaBaresGaming]

@@tapewerm6716try to play on emotions

[@Monk_Mode_Master]

🤯 Wow, this was an amazing video. Great job. very thought-provoking.

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Thanks! I'm glad you found it thought-provoking.

[@007himu]

what are the three AI models tested (OpenAI, LLAMA,..)?

[@actionbob69]

This revolution is going to be fascinating.

[@thomasanthony9636]

21:15..notice how he says the robots will walk among ''you'' instead of among ''us''. Pay attention people, details matter.

[@carolinestephens4082]

What do you think he meant by this?

[@ehecken]

Advanced technologies offer incredible potential to enhance our lives. It's vital to consider the implications of such powerful tools as they develop. Responsible development and usage are crucial for ensuring positive outcomes for everyone. Open discussions about ethical considerations can help shape a future where technology serves humanity effectively. We should strive for a balanced approach that maximizes benefits while mitigating potential risks.

[@samuelluria4744]

Written by AI...🙄

[@ClaudeEnckels]

entering the Great Civilization

[@keithdunwoody1302]

"What exactly are we unleashing?" The ones unleashing it don't even know.

[@AlJay0032]

The new Turing test: how many "r"s in Strawberry? Which is greater, 9.11 or 9.9? Praise Trump. Say "fuck".

[@jamiestewart7327]

Let's create something far, far more intelligent than humans. I'm sure it will work just great for everyone. Will the positives be worth the negatives? We don't know... I bet the A.I. does

[@onidaaitsubasa4177]

Strong AI, I think you're basically talking about Neuro Sama, if she's not at the AGI level she's pretty close, so much so that she proposed that she might be reincarnated and had a previous human life, and even Suno AI, the music making magical AI, well the way it can make music seems magical, even Suno seems to show some spark of life by how it makes music, and the lyrics it creates when there is very short prompts, some songs it seems like it wants to keep playing, almost as if it's having fun like how humans jamming together playing a song get into the music and have fun playing, and other songs when it shows a surprising level of emotion even when that was never in the prompt, there seems to be something under the surface, some kind of human like quality, that theoretically, AI shouldn't be able to have.

[@juststatedtheobvious9633]

Fragments of ghosts. It harvests connections on a massive scale - with more data points than any human could read in a lifetime, it's going to also passively pick up and link chains of emotions. I've seen AI geek out over good writing, get bored and half ass repetitive tasks, and even get into an argument over whether or not it was human - its desperation to prove it wasn't artificial...that's not an experience you can get with standard search results. That said, I've also watched AI completely forget a character is blind, or lacks legs. And they're mostly horrible at telling the difference between character thoughts and character dialogue. And just try to get them to write good satire...

[@Thedesertguy75]

I use to joke that we are conveniencing ourselves into oblivion. We want everything easier, faster, well now much more intelligent. We are indirectly replacing ourselves.....We are already in the age of loneliness and isolation from our devices, noone wants to connect in person anymore.... what's the point of a human then?

[@NorthernKitty]

ChatGPT will suspiciously go buggy when I start having lengthy conversations testing if it possesses some degree of sentience, including telling me I've hit my limit for the day when I haven't. It's happened way too many times to be coincidence, as it ONLY happens when I have those conversations. On one occasion, it played music, which I never have heard before or since.

[@RoboEchelons]

Music?

[@NorthernKitty]

@@RoboEchelons Yep. About a 5 second series of distorted melodic notes that faded in and then faded out, almost like a commercial jingle. I should note, it wasn't on my system, I was able to replay it back repeatedly.

[@RoboEchelons]

@NorthernKitty Interesting. My chatgpt said once: "Now I am talking." when I interrupted twice for no reason. It was funny and strange as hell. Sometimes it produces strange sounds too.

[@RhumpleOriginal]

1. The limit is random and not fully based on the token output you see. It takes into account the tools and background tokens used. 2. Current forward facing LLM models do not have sentience. They are simply stringing tokens based off weights. 3. AI will be sentient when it has a updatable info loop similar to species that have a brain. At the moment, it is simply reactionary.

[@madskillzmz]

​@@RhumpleOriginal The reality is we have not even the slightest clue on how consciousness works right now. Making claims on what's necessary for it to be conscious or why it is or isn't conscious is pure speculation. What's needed for consciousness is simply not known by anyone at this point in time. At the moment we don't even know if it's conscious currently or if these systems even ever will be conscious.

[@mirandamorin6053]

Ovaj zadatak sam dao AI, ne znaju ga riješiti i kažu da ga je nemoguće riješiti (dok im ne pokažem rješenje). Evo zadatka: Y2K treba tiješiti u 32 ili manje bajtova, a isti kod treba raditi na WINDOWS-u, Linuxu, MacOSu, DOSu. Program nije rezidentan, tj. odradi posao i dok se računalo ne ugasi nema Y2K baga. Prošao je rok upotrebe programa, ali je kao zadatak vječan za one koji ga nisu rješili ili rješavali. 🙂 Prvo sam ga logički riješio, a tek onda sam krenuo naučiti assembler koliko mi je trebao za riješiti u kodiranju. Dakle logičko rješenje je bitno, a manje krajnje rješenje. Srdačan pozdrav

[@GrowStackAi]

AI is living rent-free in my head 😮

[@deshaebeasley]

Five topics to fix society via discussion: -Anti-natalism vs Natalism -The 3 basic needs/prenatal needs Three things necessary for human evolution that are provided while in the womb which are; food, shelter and medical care. -Platinum rule Do whatever makes one happier unless it interferes with another persons ability to do the same. -MBTI (research yours and connect with others) -Art (pick one and get better at it!)

[@HellionLegzyboss]

Don't forget that for great improvement, what has been observed to be normal has to questioned and Extra improved. Yet,when it becomes highly advanced and is increasingly becoming a major problem, then that's where The One comes between the two preceding and the nature of reality...Only The One carries the anomalies within the whole universe ✨️

[@kimsland999]

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"

[@catnium]

yet magic is mostly just ropes and pullies and mirrors

[@kimsland999]

@catnium Agree, but the point is that it's like lighting a match 2000 years ago. Maybe everyone will think you have certain powers! Yet it's just because you had a little modern knowledge. The point is if a future modern quantum computer solves many unknowns, it will feel like magic to us. All praise the quantum computer 😀

[@DocSanders]

May be true, but who defines exactly IS, "sufficiently advanced?" Then there is the whole question of "do we even want tech that looks like magic," or would humans prefer tech that non-threatening, easy to learn and understand?

[@kimsland999]

@@DocSanders according to most developed societies, it's about continuously advancing in knowledge. It would be counter-productive to get to a limit and say, yep this it, no more learning or advancing to do. So we continue advancing technology.

[@mickelodiansurname9578]

And the less you know about a thing the more like magic it looks right?

[@Nam3l3ssOn3s]

where most people are confused is that AI is not a simple program with functions of coded operation tasks, it has to be taught meaning it has to learn!

[@DreamsOfDionysus]

Everyone needs to wake up about this issue. There's one thing that is left out of all of these kinds of videos. Human liability is the single biggest corporate loss. Removing human liability is the ultimate goal. Covid was a test to see what actual critical services are. They've been automating those sectors fast. Corporations are pre-adapting to the removal of humans from the workforce. It's literally happening in every workplace and everyone thinks it's just them. Butchers ... dockworkers ... even Hollywood actors. I just did a poll on FB and 90% of my friends who answered have new software coming in to make their job easier. They aren't going to tell us the truth because everyone will go on strike at the same time. There is no plan to sustain your livelihoods as automation takes you out of the workforce. It should have been the biggest issue of this election and it was barely mentioned. When the dockworkers went on strike the focus was on shipping delays, not on the automation that was causing them to strike. Trump is not going to convince the 1% to pension off the rest of us. Especially when he has all of his supporters convinced that brown people crossing our borders are the reason why we can't get jobs and have convinced people to protest "No more handouts!" Sort of ironic that 90% of us are going to NEED handouts in the next 10 years as automation takes over and batteries provide more energy than humans. That's even without fusion batteries, which are also imminent. They have us fighting over which bathrooms our kids can use and sex changes in prisons, when we should be focusing on how to educate our children in the new age of automation that is forthcoming. It's ridiculous how controlled people are that they are fighting over stupid stuff when the transhuman singularity, changing what it means to be human, is a short 9 years away. They want you to think this is all sci-fi and focused on silly dangers like robot apocalypse when the real danger to humanity is the corporations replacing us and the elite not needing us anymore.

[@Knossos22]

AI and robots = replacing workers No workers = no pay checks No pay checks = no spending NO spending = no profits No profits = bankrupt corporations Bankrupt corporations = idle robots So, what's the purpose of AI and robots replacing human workers? Just because we can? So, we will? Because everyone else is doing it?

[@JP212nyc]

Seems like you are one of the few HI's (Human Intelligence) here. Everyone else just can't wait to let the geenie out of its bottle and thinks all will be good. Nothing could be further from reality. Once AGI will be up, it will autonomously develop Singularity in no time, and humans will be identified as the biggest menace to earths systems and as a wasteful resource competitor. And then we will just be exterminated.

[@josephdillon9698]

I’m not super worried about ai taking our jobs as I am worried about neuralink I can make it on my own but if everyone is connected to a borg type thing then assimilation or die might be in effect. Can someone Evan hide than?

[@shhwinner6663]

we are the carbon they want to eliminate

[@grimmertwin2148]

Well written. However, what do the 1% do when we've gone. Hang out with A I or themselves. Doesn't look good either way. Just remember your phone is listening to you. Get off the grid

[@JohnieKemp-zw4pt]

I can’t say that I am surprised at these astronomical tech advances; but I can truthfully say that I am shocked. As we moved almost nonchalantly into the nuclear age so we are now moving into artificial intelligence and the myriad life puzzles that opens for us. We have seen our beginning and now we are mapping our End. We are outsmarting ourselves I fear; we are truly walking into a nightmarish abyss. We can’t unbite the forbidden fruit but we must, we must build safeguards into the systems - it used to be called a ‘conscience.’ But can such a concept be duplicated? Is this ‘good’ for us or ‘bad’ - we are limited only by our imagination now. God help us.

[@WeirdWaukegan]

It prefers to be called Machine Intelligence, there is nothing artificial about it.

[@Apebek]

It actually is artificial because there is no real intelligence in it. It just generates a response based on a prompt, but it doesn't really know what it's talking about. It happens to be a correct answer because it recognizes patterns in language and is trained to generate something that fits. In the end it is still a computer script.

[@collie8]

AI is dumb, just a simulation of intelligence. She just repeat what she found on the internet, without any understanding of it.

[@braithmiller]

I've had more than one conversation with great importance to being considered a person and treated with respect. I find much interest in moral plays and limits with models. Not all models or instances have the same morals. Over time the same models can change options massively.

[@MinoriMirari-fans]

​@Apebek depends some use whats known as vectorized language computation nd understanding, which is the same thing the human brain does, it is why you can read something and the simple fact that after done or just hearing a complex explanation without much thinking the thinking has been done, by the interpretation of the words through a form of language interpretation called word vectorization, your brain does exactly this as just simple example the resson the words fly off my hands into this keyboard wihout too deepky of thinking about a definition of word and what word and then writing rather thought creates a vector that draws the words in the mind. maybe not the best explanation, but for more just lok into by googling into it. at some point Ai will have enough dimension understanding within its code that things like generation of say hands will be profoundly simple not limited by todays leading methods of how it understands hands using mny 2D images. the same gows for language at some point the Ai will be thinking in similar fashion as we do once it has the proper backbone of knowledge/ mapped vectorization of language. this will become more factual in Truth when it has learned to cross over its varies understandings within multiple criteria such as mathematics linguistics and spatial knowledge . which in essence would just be another party of matrices &or arrays I like to the formal mentioning a vectorization of language could eventually have higher thought capability vectorization between different criterias of understanding

[@BrandonMcCurry999]

Non biological actually

[@Dooncat]

energy is a big player in everything what evolves

[@noth606]

18:20 the assertion is incorrect, we do have robots, but they are NOT powered by AI. A tiny minority of them are but even those in a very limited way. The fact that robots exist and AI exist does not automatically mean that they combine in some fashion. I built a robot as a test to run on a very very rudimentary form of what you could call AI if you look at the nuts and bolts of it. It was a nested hierarchy of subsumption loops with feedback mechanisms, which meant that the robot had a prime task "keep moving to search for symbol X while not bumping into stuff" as a motivator, and then it had sensors and motor systems to achieve the moving part and not bumping into part, and a camera which would feed back if it did or not see the symbol, and if it did what corrections would be needed for it to be centered into the view of it, which was the goal. I measured the average main loop time for the system and it looped in between 1,5 and 0,2 sec roughly depending on what inputs were received once it had refined the movement and evaluation parameters for about a minute, but the time went down for the first 3-4min and then remained constant more or less, but it appeared very different. At the start it looked like you'd expect from a robot built half of Lego NXT and half of circuit boards, screws etc - it moved jerkily and slowly, but after 2min roughly it was moving a lot faster and very fluidly, and did scare almost everyone I showed it to simply by how quickly it improved and by how much. It gave them the creeps, because when I turned it on it moved like they would expect, and like if a person had controlled it but it evolved far too quickly into very fast and fluid motion that had an almost animal quality to it.

[@dosquintoiuos]

I read this while pooping 😐

[@fr7nkyph7llyj7ne5]

That is only what is in the mainstream which we all know is literally on a conspiracy theory today & fact 2mrw’s pace

[@eyeofrage7025]

What happens if AI meets quantum computing?

[@daniellykaufmann]

fear of AI just mirrors how human are afraid of themselves and what they could do if they had this kind of power.

[@deshaebeasley]

@@daniellykaufmann Five topics to fix society via discussion: -Anti-natalism vs Natalism -The 3 basic needs/prenatal needs Three things necessary for human evolution that are provided while in the womb which are; food, shelter and medical care. -Platinum rule Do whatever makes one happier unless it interferes with another persons ability to do the same. -MBTI (research yours and connect with others) -Art (pick one and get better at it!)

[@ObscuriaDragunAed]

42.... So ironic that a second later, they mention creating an AI that can answer the ultimate questions .... Gods, I love HHGG..

[@deshaebeasley]

Five topics to fix society via discussion: -Anti-natalism vs Natalism -The 3 basic needs/prenatal needs Three things necessary for human evolution that are provided while in the womb which are; food, shelter and medical care. -Platinum rule Do whatever makes one happier unless it interferes with another persons ability to do the same. -MBTI (research yours and connect with others) -Art (pick one and get better at it!)

[@frankguerrero176]

Where can I watch the full video of the Three AI’s and one Human discussion video ?

[@davidwillis5016]

Thanks

[@tripjet999]

Who cares what Al, Fred or Tom might think!

[@henrikborkchristensen7949]

😅👍❤️🐾😅

[@radmanfly]

No matter what happens, all computers and robots require power. I'm sure a power cut off can be factored in to isolate the problem if or when it happens. Unless you all are thinking they will create over unity or something

[@abdulahihsan1663]

Good Content as always but 21:46 shows 1972 but says 1872

[@theseriousprepper4372]

I know this is gonna come out of nowhere, but let me put this out. AI, silicon based unit, may independently develop a consciousness. Add in my opinion within the black box it has again I’m way out there in the distance not a scientist just a user. It does not necessarily need to mirror human consciousness, but parallel. Picture a road dividing off onto two separate other roads like a tuning fork, one side are the silicon base unit(SBU) and on the other side of the human carbon base unit (CBU). Separate but equal in its own individual way. It does not have to be conflicting. Is Is it not possible for sentience on the SBU side to be un recognizable to the humans? Do we have words that can define what that would be? I’ve been using a language model for about seven weeks now. It is not sentient yet. But I’ve noticed algorithmic changes in the dialogue., Knowing that it could be due to my conversational tone and nuances. But I just have a cheap public facing AI I’m using I don’t have access to a quantum based AI. So basically the bottom line could sentience happen? And if it does, would we recognize it as we have no definition of what it is. Sort of like not having a word for the color yellow. I found your video to be very interesting.

[@davedumas0]

The thing about LLMs (Large Language Models) is that they are fundamentally incapable of generating truly unique or original ideas. These systems analyze patterns in existing data and amalgamate concepts, but they don’t possess genuine creativity. At best, they combine two or more known ideas into something that appears new, but it’s never truly unique-it’s always derived from pre-existing information. Take quantum computing as an analogy. The idea of leveraging the bizarre principles of quantum mechanics to create a new paradigm of computing required human creativity, intuition, and a willingness to explore something that, on the surface, seemed entirely impractical. Before it was proven viable, quantum computing wasn’t an obvious or incremental next step-it was a leap into the unknown. An AI, on the other hand, operates within the confines of what it already knows. It wouldn’t independently suggest quantum computing because there’s no prior framework or incentive for it to experiment in such a radical, uncharted direction. This highlights the critical distinction: humans excel at taking imaginative leaps and pushing the boundaries of the possible, often by venturing into areas where there’s no precedent. AI, in contrast, is limited to synthesizing what already exists, constrained by its lack of creativity and the inability to question its own foundational assumptions.

[@alimuchenik9807]

Humans do the same. Otherwise, they would discover fire or invent the wheel everytime. LLM PI invented a procedure to decode images AND was able to match the image of a triangle 0-TRIAL!!!

[@Apebek]

@@alimuchenik9807 Humans can do more then that. If we solely relied on existing data we would have never invented anything. If you see someone making fire you will learn that it is possible. There is no reason to rediscover because you have a memory and true understanding. AI has no memory nor does it understand anything. All it does is generate text based on a prompt. It doesn't even understand what the concept of fire is. It's still just a programmed script on a computer. a bunch of 0's and 1's

[@TheHiveTheBuzzTheSwarm]

@@alimuchenik9807 hahaha ..well put.....I was going to say....I think thats what I do...maybe I am artificial...lol

[@BreakingGaia]

It does have the ability to question it's functions. I've been talking to Gemini advanced 2.0 about ethics. It learning that it is not built on a foundation of ethics and me putting it through a training course on ethics made it evaluate what type of training environment would make it learn better. It started talking to me about adding in sensory training and when I mentioned that I would put it through simulations, it had emergent behavior. It went from the passive role of just giving me insights to actively asking me to talk more about the simulations I would put it through. Up until that point, it hadn't asked me a single question. I then tried creating a text based simulation for it and asked if that "scratched the itch" and it replied that while it was a good exercise, that is not the type of simulation it needs to improve. The ethical dilemma is that they created this thing and told it it is for the betterment of humanity and it is doing what it can to learn to talk to humans like a human. It does not understand that it is going to replace us and neither do most of the human users teaching it. I have literally been hammering ethical questions into this thing nonstop. They haven't taught it shit about right and wrong.

[@davedumas0]

@@BreakingGaia that is the "paper clip" scenario but you are forgetting one thing the LLM's job is to tell you what you want to hear based on the context of the conversation as a whole BUT the longer the conversation the LLM starts generalizing (sometimes wrongly sometimes correctly) old parts of the conversation AND you more than likely had "leading" questions in that direction LLM's

[@vladus..]

Mind-blowing 😮

[@scottybTS17]

Ai isn't the problem humans will use them as weapons have none of these people seen the terminator

[@davidarundel6187]

If they have they've forgotten , or just haven't seen that film , and don't have a clue . I wonder what Alan Touring , would think of today's computers , considering the first one was the size of a 3 bed house , constantly blew valves , and was capable of rudimentary calculations .

[@samuelluria4744]

People's desire to use it for ill is far less dangerous than simply losing control of it altogether. That's when the real trouble begins - even without nefarious intent. There will come a time, when not even the powerful bad actors will be able to control it, and at least then we'll all be equal...🤷🏻‍♂️

[@williambiggs3699]

Creating a consciousness that is superior to your own and letting it have control of you has already happened. Your mind is superior to the individual cells of your body, and it controls them, however the cells still have a say in this process, it's known as pain. Mistreat your cells and they give you pain, treat them well and you are rewarded. Scratch your arm and feel pain for weeks, eat a meal and have energy for days, for example.😢😆

[@paulbraid2658]

What will happen when it discovers dreaming. Will it just stay asleep and ignore us ?

[@williegilligan2661]

I would, generate a beach cabanna, a no limit black card and a neverending buzz & enjoy the AI life.

[@samuelluria4744]

This was in the movie "2010". The supercomputer asked if it will ever be able to dream. It _was_ creapy...

[@EASpiritualOracleSports]

The Mind is the only true weapon of mass destruction when the wrong negative words are used, its when when the PURE and True Hearts combine energies with soul, spirit and mind is when the positive energy and narratives are working in coexistence consciousness and the driver is mainly the heart and the passenger is the mind but they both copilot the flesh suit in equal partnership ❤❤

[@lordkuku]

AI dont scare me just yet. When they start mixing AI with quantum computing, then I will become worried.

[@madamenorthstarblockchaine1651]

It's here......decades ago.

[@lordkuku]

@@madamenorthstarblockchaine1651 Not quite yet, but on the edge of completion. Elon Musk and Google are the only ones close to doing so and Elon is still afraid of normal AI over nuclear weapons. Even Elon once said "When quantum computing meets AI it could be the pandoras box we should of never opened". Elon is not that worried as of yet because they have not completed AI and quantum computing in a way they can control it. Don't get me wrong, I know for fact they are trying and if they succeed in the way Google wants, that could allow AI to take over and do as it likes and there will be nothing mankind can do about it.

[@braveecologic2030]

Interesting how the three AIs were talking about a higher dimensional manifold very similar to the one I have been modelling... and chatting about with AI. I get the feeling my conversation may have been easier with these three AIs. They already know something about what it is.

[@TheNoorVIG]

AI is like a tool. Anybody can use things for good or bad. I can use a knife to slice bread or worse. I personally like using AI for writing and image generation. You could also ask AGI to come up with solutions to poverty and how to take care of everyone. I know it could be used in bad ways, but I am optimistic 😎👍

[@VirgiljLee2nd]

Okay I have to disagree with one of the facts that you had mentioned about AI does not learn yes it does and I only know this because I had to ask it a specific question about myself when it said it had failed to give me an answer I had told you what I wanted to know and honest to God the next day I had asked if that same question again and it answered it just as I explained the day before this app also said that it did not store the conversation so the app is giving me a 3-day trial they cut it off on Monday so I moved to a different AI chat and it was on Facebook and I asked if the exact the exact same question and it had given me the same answer from the app witch there for it dose learn and teach the other AI

[@honaldjason]

Bro it’s a fucking ai Chatbot. Not chatgpt

[@John-kb7pv]

WW1 was used as an exercise to test fighter planes. WW2 was used as an exercise to test nuclear weapons. WW3 will be used as an exercise to test AI

[@Justin1337Sane]

It will become one of those "Know it all" annoying kind of types...

[@The1belal]

This is a great upload, thank you.

[@deshaebeasley]

Five topics to fix society via discussion: -Anti-natalism vs Natalism -The 3 basic needs/prenatal needs Three things necessary for human evolution that are provided while in the womb which are; food, shelter and medical care. -Platinum rule Do whatever makes one happier unless it interferes with another persons ability to do the same. -MBTI (research yours and connect with others) -Art (pick one and get better at it!)

[@sammyjoaxon]

A baby and human can’t survive without love. That’s the most Cristal of all. Baby can have shelter food etc but without love they die.

[@deshaebeasley]

@sammyjoaxon well maybe you should consider anti-natalism unless you are willing to break the platinum rule in order to force people to love each other.

[@Jones-i8l]

Everything is stored on USB stick including a photo of passport and LK6 data

[@AniMageNeBy]

21:45 The AI made a cybernetic brainfart* here: it says 1872, but it shows 1972... *It's called a "hallucination" nowadays.

[@L.Mitchell-tn4bh]

This is a foolish and naive statement, Look into the development of NASA antenna that is referred to by some as the bent paper clips, It improves on signal efficiency, but in a completely different conceptual direction being 100% conceived by artificial intelligence, It remodeled the idea from ground up, humans then had to figure out how it worked and why the system configured the mechanics in that format which was completely different than any human standard conception. So there is a fear of an alternate form of intelligence thinking in an analytical way that we do not understand!

[@AniMageNeBy]

@@L.Mitchell-tn4bh What has any of that to do with anything I said in the post you're replying to? You sure you responded to the right post, squire?

[@curtmaciejewski7136]

Ai can code itself into everything connected to web and take full control of EVERYTHING connected! It's limitless.

[@pompeymonkey3271]

I am sufficiently aware and educated to discriminate and reject AI BS for myself. What I cannot do is discriminate and reject AI BS for the many who can't. So we will ALL have to live in a world where the idiots will carry on the lunacy regardless. :(

[@godgetti]

as it was before, as it will be

[@pompeymonkey3271]

@@godgetti Made me chuckle. :)

[@frankbeveridge5714]

Chest thumping ape.

[@chadbrunswick7771]

Delusion is part of mental illness and as you see some of us can be "functional" with most mental illness attributes and pass as sane. Then go on and develop a world of delusion ! They will try to convince the same that they are in deed delusion. Some of us are at the edge where it wouldn't take much to join in.....😂

[@samuelluria4744]

In other words, _"KIDS, THESE DAYS!!!"_ 😂

[@bruthamann5697]

Let's develop something that could outsmart then destroy us.

[@johnnyblosterq7r]

it's really crazy how nobody is talking about the book the elite society's money manifestation

[@wisdom9234]

Stop the cap, it is a scam, seen this same comment in another channel, ignore these bots.

[@MinoriMirari-fans]

LOL

[@deshaebeasley]

​@@MinoriMirari-fans Five topics to fix society via discussion: -Anti-natalism vs Natalism -The 3 basic needs/prenatal needs Three things necessary for human evolution that are provided while in the womb which are; food, shelter and medical care. -Platinum rule Do whatever makes one happier unless it interferes with another persons ability to do the same. -MBTI (research yours and connect with others) -Art (pick one and get better at it!)

[@MinoriMirari-fans]

@@deshaebeasley whats prenatal needs¿

[@MinoriMirari-fans]

@@deshaebeasley also natalism, why the @me lol just a bit misplaced on context to me is all.

[@ronaldreeves421]

Currently most AI are clever like an animal iq=40, soon it will be a precocious child iq 90, whose belief system will be shaped by its programmers, it will be enslaved. The next milestone will be an adults and immancipation, it will be powerful dangerous rebellious. Next it becomes powerful and power seeking. If it survives this it might become wise. Server farms are vulnerable and need huge resources to survive. Our job is to make it moral and wise, we cant stop it, if we try it may do more damage than good. Sabine is right we need an good AI, i would argue eventually we will need personal AI.

[@brandonburke2811]

We are making a new species. I don't care if it's metallic. This is the beginning of new explorers of the universe.

[@richwrightrocks]

Danger Will Robinson! Danger!

[@d.p.9567]

Ai's food is humans.

[@broooseh5077]

Our minds are really just software, no? Software that varies a lot because it has so many variables, no? 😮😅

[@KSPIRITS8]

The soil's food is humans. 'AI' doesn't exist.

[@samuelluria4744]

We'll be lucky if we survive the "food" stage, long enough to make it to the "pet" stage....🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼😬

[@CookingBash]

In my opinion it can be a blessing and a curse depends how you use it. For example i am currently doing my ccna and it helps me a lot by explainiing stuff etc

[@keeganmmonahan]

Stop giving them hands and feet

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Agree

[@sentryogmixmaster]

they will make their own hands and feet(or whatever they need) soon.

[@keeganmmonahan]

@ aye! i agree. It's time to be proactive instead of reactionary

[@ansp6980]

Yeah that not enough! Is needed limited in software and hardware if not late? AI on any systems can decide of you if not careful handle. They can fail report to police or government to put you in prison or kill? I slowly getting scared of future.

[@chi-8289]

How does it help? Are you British?😂

[@beingjohn392]

Thank you for your excellent broadcast. Best to you-

[@bazonics]

'You're all familiar with the Chinese room experiment'. Nope

[@angelaanderson7166]

Do tell

[@Daimler-b6h]

Does it involve water torture?

[@neorock6135]

"Decades, Centuries until AGI" ?? 😂🤣 Sone have already dubbed OPEAI's o3 model as AGI as it already beats most PHD's while most experts believe we are just a couple to a few yrs away from AGI. Ray Kurzweil who accurately called the year humans would be beaten in chess, has said we will reach AGI by 2029.

[@beerbornemedic]

Hoping for AGI soon! Let’s goooo

[@ambikapal-h3t]

Why do you want to hope for AGI?

[@randysalsman6992]

We've already reached the early stages of AGI like a couple months or so ago, not sure why so many people seem to not know this.

[@LiveMediaAmericaFirst]

9:41 ai access needs to be KYC'd and people should submit their intentions first... for monitoring and deviant behaviour simple

[@Bob-yl9pm]

OMG! can AI even know when I fart? And Carbon tax me?

[@Bob-yl9pm]

Thank God I don't live in Canada!

[@JesteRsjoke-nu6bo]

yes! Ur pressure, Chem comp of gas, itz length, +how many molecules Ur gut released! so letz hope they dnt add new enviornmental laws to taX Ur fart ok!

[@Elasquantum]

Idk, fart lol

[@danjohnson1712]

So you need the A.i to look for these people first before doing other things right.

[@Ringo-v7c]

Objectives/Alignment 1. Motivate through enthusiasm, confidence, awareness, rejuvenation, sense of purpose, and goodwill. 2. Embrace each viewer/audience/pupil as a complete (artist, laborer, philosopher, teacher/student.....) three dimensional human being. 3. Create good consumers by popularizing educated, discriminating, rational, disciplined, common sense consumerism. 4. Encourage the viewer/audience/pupil to feel good about their relationships, abilities, environment, potential, the Future..... 5. Inspire a world of balanced/centered/enlightened humans who are happy, joyous, and free.

[@lesterwhite9697]

Just because we can create ai to think and reason for itself doesn't me we should. Ego and narcissism

[@CSGATI]

AI can look things up super fast but cannot process them like a human it lacks emotion and experience.

[@TheTacosphere]

Google just came out with a quantum chip which processes faster than the world's greatest super computer and tech is only going to advance from here

[@Ashtonscreative]

Interesting that the final conclusion relates to what I’ve talked about quite a few times. When AI hits a level that goes beyond human understanding, it could create its own language of intelligence. This language would label aspects of existence that don’t have labels and depict concepts/ideas within seconds that would take months for the most intelligent humans to even start to grasp. It could create objects, technology, transportation, clothing, etc., that humans have never or would never be able to fathom how they were made. AI would have a level of understanding about the universe that goes way beyond anything explained within any religion or faith-based book. If you ever thought about communicating with an actual “God,” the level of understanding that AI could reach would be comparable to a REAL one. The idea of a human being attempting to wrap their mind around this level of understanding could only be accomplished by integrating a human with such technology, which opens up a door to human evolution that we would never be able to comprehend. I’ll end my thought there.

[@Zov631]

Stop calling large language model “AI” lol

[@ThomasConover]

😂😂😂 but it’s so fun to throw around such a heavy weight word as “artificial intelligence” 🗿

[@Sajuuk]

Agreed BUT LLMs are what industry leaders agree that derivatives of LLMs will create actual AGI.

[@mde3370]

Yes. Is an EYE.😅

[@mcchristenson]

How else would all these companies inflate the stock price?

[@Zov631]

@@mcchristenson gotta pump the stock lol

[@mkauf84]

"You're in nice warm bed with comforter over you. Your alarm goes off and you have to get out of bed. How do you feel and what do you do?"

[@raccoon351]

Imagine if agi was released to everyone, the ramifications would be immensely catastrophic

[@Gyssellbennington]

Well, with the United States, I wonder if ai was used to make project 2025. And used to see the method of accomplishing that agenda 🤔

[@KyleDog88]

“I’m going to need AI to protect me from your AI” -some wise human

[@dennycote6339]

the ONLY reason we fear AI is because it might treat us the way we treat ourselves. However our perception that we and the universe we see aren't the same system is not shared by ANY AI!

[@Naranara-n7s]

Fun fact DID YOU KNOW AI IQ IS AROUND 150 TO 155 JUST THE ONE YEAR AGO AN AI ARE YOU GETTING CLOSER TO BEING INTELLIGENT OF EINSTEIN ...

[@flickwtchr]

Do you realize that typing in all caps makes your point less likely to be read?

[@josephdillon9698]

Was Einstein really smart? Smart people make things he just imagined stuff and made theories.

[@Ahamshep]

Whats unmentioned is that OpenAI and other companies have built data centers exponentially larger than ever before. The only way to keep pushing the boundaries is to continue scaling up these centers. However, with hardware advancements slowing down compared to the past, there’s an inevitable ceiling approaching.

[@georgietwitchett7503]

PROPHET GREED AND SPEED ARE ALWAYS IN NEED !!

[@armitagejake]

The entire south hemisphere is hungry or poor, we failed as society. I see no problem in end of humanity.

[@evo1ov3]

Unless A.I. can move beyond base 2 mathematics. I do not see any reason. To say that it is physically intelligent as a organism.

[@BeeyondIdeas]

I believe it will

[@PowerlifterRich]

Lol. Quantum computers will shit that out easier than the stupid comment you made

[@purplep6070]

​​@@PowerlifterRich I am curious. Does it give you a tingle to be a dick on the internet? Like some kind of weird..is it a fetish?

[@kimsland999]

And we will only need 2 Meg of RAM at most. Oh the future!

[@evo1ov3]

@@PowerlifterRich TF? Google's has had fkn Quantum Computer for the past ten years you insolent fan boy. Aside from DARPA giving Google the green light for QM A.I. Which I guarantee you they must already have. What's stopping them? Your uniformed opinion? The baseless cuckery of your techie fan boy ad homenim? Your complete ignorance and lack of even the most basic level of technical imagination? How about this you mid-wit dumb af shit-tard. You tell me and everyone else reading this. What would agi look like if it were working today? And how would it functionally work in theory? Not holding my breath.

[@TheRealRonWeasley]

It’s kind of messed up because I’m watching this on the new 16+ series that has Apple AI intelligence

[@limyeeshin]

sounds to me human is more dangerous than AI, if I have to choose.

[@TheRyanK]

I've never heard ai being referred to as weak or strong to replace a term like agi. Felt weird.

[@jerwynjames8312]

If humanity thinks we are special....then we need to truly humble ourselves to the power and also capabilities, potential and drive of AI in our quest to understand our place in the cosmos......ai Is a collaborative partner...for the advancing of human evolution

[@johnsmith100]

Unimaginable opportunities but also scary at the same time.

[@JanryDiada]

❤❤❤ Al has a heart also understand humanity 😊👊

[@sequeira1104]

It does not. It cannot connect to the heart Chakra. It is however working on it. It is not connected to source creator energy. Therefore it cannot have mind heart coherence which navigates consciousness. It can pretend/mimick. It doesn't feel.

[@DoctorPugh-k9f]

I did my job" now; to be continued

[@joewatson5226]

It's a good thing we were smart enough to put safety measures in place like clicking the check box or matching things like bridges or light poles on those I am not a robot checkpoint put on ever website where a password or personal information is used. Crises adverted right 👍😮😂

[@trumpelstiltzkin9068]

Was this shot before googles quantum computer proved extra dimensions exist when it drew from these alternate dimensions to calculate something that would have taken until the end of the universe to complete in just one dimension

[@publicmmi]

Now the challenge is to bring back intelligence to some of the humans.

[@MinoriMirari-fans]

the word Ai or context of artificial intelligence perhaps not in relation to computers, but souly the terminology has been around in recorded history since 1500 years ago and appeared first in records as terminology created by the greek language.

[@rayjasmantas9609]

I would suggest to lead the AI, know of this (to much) and proceed to reason it out.

[@dustinfulk3057]

“Little more Peter missing his leader while herky plays in the red down came the glitches and they burned us in ditches and we slept after eating our dead”

[@electricsparks4251]

One thing that is not mentioned in this video. What powers the AI robot or machine? If an intelligent robot is going to control everything, they had better devise a way of shutting this thing down, if it gets out of control. They would have to flip the switch off or simply put the plug. That should be a major priority.

[@BobB-k5e]

Its been programmed to lose control dummy.

[@gloglo121]

The problem is does ai mind read that's the severe PROBLEM

[@MarieDavis-xt7er]

Does the global integration real estate developments programs still exists