Behind US Genius Idea To Test a Truck-Mounted Super-Fast Gatling Gun

Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel to witness how the U.S. is providing cover to its armed forces from aerial threats with innovative solutions.
Fluctus is a website and KZbin channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our KZbin channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

[@smokechecktim7430]

Years ago some of us wondered why a proven system, that was on most navy ships, couldn’t be used by the army as a point defense system. I guess it just took the army brass a long time to overcome the fact that it came from the navy

[@Veritas-invenitur]

@@mr.sharktoothCRAM’s are not just expensive and difficult to manufacture, they are extremely valuable intellectual property. On a ship, it is far more difficult to gain meaningful (espionage) unauthorized access to a CRAM than it is on land. So, the army had to wait. But now, with an elevated risk of a major war with a superpower, the decision has been revised.

[@alberto148]

@@Veritas-invenitur superpower is an overstatement, both publically and covertly

[@Veritas-invenitur]

@alberto148 War With BRIC's is possible my dude. If you even know what BRIC's is...

[@OFW0lfGangKTA]

We already use cram on land. We had them in Iraq and afghan. I couldn’t say how far back but I know 2016 in iraq.

[@fademusic1980]

@@Veritas-invenitur again superpower is an overstatement. China is the only group in that discussion that may qualify. russia is a joke.

[@thomashenshallhydraxis]

CRAM protected our unit from mortars on our position in Iraq. Could see the explosions in sky coming directly towards our JSS. It’s a wicked sound.

[@johnhopkins6260]

GAU-12 (big brother to the GAU-8, of A-10 Thunderbolt fame) is also airborne in the USAF AC-130 Spectre gunship; Unlike the sea-wiz/gee-wiz, the previous Gatling guns are not autonomous, but use automation-assisted targeting... occasionally backed up with a 105mm howitzer, for "punctuation".

[@txvet7738]

CRAM has saved my butt on our FOB a few times during deployment! It was cool to see at night! The Army use to have another Shorad system called the M6 Bradley Linebacker which I was on for a little while. The Army and it’s infinite wisdom thought it wasn’t needed and scrapped it. Now the Army had to jump through hoops and waste more taxpayer dollars to come up with a new weapons system when we already had something to do the job. Good job guys!!

[@HarryCriswell-pz1rm]

I salute USA military personnel! Thank you for keeping us safe.

[@SandmanAlpha4]

Oh yeah , deployment where? A CRAM being used near a FOB is bad logistics and mobility. Which conflict? Because it wasn't used often after munition costs we're realized with often usage. Sounds like a vague answer to me , which means , well you know. 🙄

[@lawrence7429]

Who why did us not supply this to uses

[@lawrence7429]

Who why did us not supply this to uses

[@daeclipse03]

​@@SandmanAlpha4there's literally videos all over YT of them being used in Iraq and Afghanistan. This isn't the gotcha moment you thought it was lol.

[@mcdutchpatriot6763]

We used this in the Netherlands almost 45 years ago. The goalkeeper It is a Dutch invention, and as a Dutch Marine I have seen this beast working. It is impressive and very effective

[@alberto148]

you're right this is dutch in design and in software - puzzing why Americans think this is indigenous. this thing probably wouldn't exist without NATO.

[@effexon]

how often must reload? at least 1-2 man team to reload, burns bullets a lot. trucks needed to supply enough ammo :D Id guess still cheaper to burn thousands of bullets per min than launch one patriot/S-300,S-400 missile per threat.

[@chechnya]

The Phalanx was developed in 1969 produced in 1978. The Goalkeeper was developed in 1975 and produced in 1979.

[@Ihavpickle]

Thanks big thick daddy Dutch cutie pies

[@tedmoss]

@@effexon Yes we have depleted uranium.

[@M00R3]

Very cool, served with some of those brigades in my PATRIOT days. What an awesome system.

[@Chris1982416]

Yeah I remember Charlie Battery 3/2 ADA tested the prototype in Yuma. A what units were you in? I was E btry 3/43 11th BDE , A btry 3/2 31st BDE, A 1/1 ADA 94th AAMDC and HHB 31st BDE from 2001 to 2007

[@M00R3]

@@Chris1982416 I was in D 1/44 ADA it's been ages so recalling which brigades is difficult but I recognized a couple of those patches. I was in from 07-2010 edit: 11th, and 35th sound familiar but don't hold me to it lmao

[@Chris1982416]

@@M00R3 do you know a guy named SSG Mahlstead from your days at 1/44 ADA

[@M00R3]

@@Chris1982416 no. Was he in delta? That name rings zero bells.

[@Paul-pz3us]

Imagine making it smaller and adapting it to a tank to protect the crew

[@danielmocsny5066]

Then the tank would evolve in the direction of the battleship. Battleships used to rule the seas, able to outgun any ship besides a comparable enemy battleship. But over time, battleships became vulnerable to bombs and torpedoes, and they had to keep mounting more and more anti-aircraft guns. They also needed escorting ships such as destroyers to protect them from hostile torpedo boats and submarines. Eventually guided missiles rendered their big guns obsolete, and battleships became too expensive to maintain. The tank is like the battleship of the land - not obsolete yet, but threatened by an array of weapons that are hard to protect against. Tanks are great if your enemy has only rifles and machine guns, and not so great against artillery, anti-tank missiles, and mines. Like the battleship in its waning years, the tank is only useful if you have the other assets necessary to protect it, or you're facing a very poorly equipped enemy.

[@lordraydens]

y tho

[@OathTaker3]

I recommended putting seawiz's on vehicles a ways back, it's nice to be heard.🤠

[@richarda.valdes1197]

Great idea …now there needs to be five supply trucks behind this gun😮

[@galesams4205]

My unit in vietnam had a GUN-TTruck with a mounted memi gun mounted on it and 2 50 cal. M-2 brownings heavy to escort ammo and diesel fuel to foward fire bases and pleiku. 4th div. 69th armor.

[@tedmoss]

Mini Gatling gun.

[@guyh.4553]

Didn’t know that they got the Phalanx system onto ground base forces (Arm & Marines). Which is great. In this day & age of Drone strikes, it is much more cost-effective system. It also saves the Patriots for the higher value targets like jets, copters, MQ-9 type drones. Like it!

[@riskinhos]

there's much better cost effective systems against drones. this isn't for drones. actually with such a reduced RCS is going to have a hard time hitting one.

[@mdjosimislam3297]

@@riskinhos m

[@mdjosimislam3297]

@@riskinhos me

[@patriot0971]

Would you sell a million dollar system or a billion dollar system ? Would you spend $50 projectile or a $50k projectile. We are dealing with military industrial complex here.

[@Veritas-invenitur]

@@patriot0971Lasers my man. Lasers are the future of defense. Our adversaries have spent decades mass manufacturing and stockpiling rockets, missiles, shells, mortars, and now drones. Even our best systems in the field can be overwhelmed through volume. We cannot produce and restock ballistic based defense systems fast enough to maintain a war with China at the moment. We require a defense system that does not utilize manufactured ammunition. We require a defense system that does not cost so much per shot that our adversaries can exploit it to financially ruin us. A laser based defense system should cost less than 100$ a shot. At that price, we will not be susceptible to that type of economic exploit. And our manufacturing capabilities can be better utilized.

[@josephpacchetti5997]

Interesting Video, I've been subbed for awhile, THX 🇺🇸

[@garymiller5937]

Awesome systems! 😊😊

[@Zagoreni02A]

There is something in those CIWS guns, when they go prrrr.

[@arnelbernardo4844]

Philippines should have this truck mounted CIWS for defense and mobility.

[@power62gamesincyoutube56]

SIMPLE and EFFECTIVE. It goes to show you what one can do with existing technology. If it works for the carrier it definitely will work with the ground force. How about configure it for capital building protection?

[@bubamaranovichok4901]

Simple and effective? No kidding dude. Your capital only danger is your government. Can you imagine that “ terrific “ weapon mounted on a top of an Abrams tank? Nothing is simple in the US. They complicating even the none complicated things to confuse the every day Joe. Go back to the basic didn’t fit any other nation but the US!

[@TheSLOShadow]

.. I think of it this way. If someone manages to get past ring of DC defenses and manages to strike the Whitehouse with a rocket or mortar.. well Whitehouse deserves to be destroyed then. We don't need a Cwiz system on the white house it is guarded well enough and would make it more of a military fort instead of the admin office that it is. Seriously.. if u feel that the white house isn't protected enough.. then we have a problem with our armed forces, and our foreign and domestic intelligence agencies.

[@memo58]

Maybe on ships.. but on land a modern howitzer clears it away .. - On land not so effektiv !

[@Blindfolded.911]

How mounting the anti-aircraft gatling gun on vehicle is genius? This is not the first time that anti-aircraft mounted on vehicle.

[@smokechecktim7430]

The difference is the sea whizz can detect and destroy mortar rounds a small drones. Most AA can’t

[@thomasklein4265]

I want to see a CRAM built around the 30mm gun on the A-10, that would be epic

[@chrismair8161]

A ground vehicle would hold more than 30 seconds of Wupass! However the German Gepard with twin 35mm Cannons is fun to watch too! Too fun! Proximity fused ammo that creates a cloud of really sharp metal in front of a flying target. In an M1-A2 Abrams Tank..the driver has to do not much when the Cannon fires as the drive line talks to the gun and absorbs the recoil. Ergo it can shoot at 45 MPH and 72 tons.

[@spencercameron2980]

Give your head a shake man.....the A-10 was built around its gun. It would never fit. Im saying put around a dozen on an AC 130😮

[@tedmoss]

@@spencercameron2980 Bigger is better.

[@wpatrickw2012]

C-RAM is designed to defend from missile attacks coming directly towards the ship. The 20mm gun usually has too short of a range to be of much use in a land-based setting. This was the problem with the Vietnam-era M-167 Vulcan Air Defense System. I would love to see a C-RAM type system paired with a Bushmaster gun in the 30-40mm range.

[@roysnider3456]

While I admire you gumption the Army has had the Vulcan system for decades now, essentially a 30mm Gatling gun mounted to a armored 113.

[@robertwright4015]

Why not the awesome GAU-8 Avenger that uses 30mm shells and has an effective range of 4000` ? ?

[@anonypersona3189]

way more expensive, more recoil, less rate of fire, less ammo capacity, more weight.

[@beautifulfouse]

I dont think this is anything new, in 1973 we had The M167 Vulcan which we towed as a unit not a trailer. It was capable of firing as many rounds of the same exact ammunition, 20 MM. I was in the 1/3 Air Defense at Fort Campbell Kentucky, if we had them in the 101st Airborne Division then I know they were widespread across the combat units of the US Army.

[@cracnain]

Not that last idea, but good system!

[@lattehour]

in short time they will realize this is one of the best system ever and probably the most necessary on the battlefield

[@BobbyDotNet]

This isn't new. In fact pretty sure that is the video I saw 20 years ago. But seeing 155mm rounds with several holes shot through them is still pretty impressive.

[@danielk.english6004]

this is just a PIVAD.

[@johncunningham4820]

Phalanx on a Truck . Great idea .

[@UnderTheBanner]

Genius? Hahahaha That idea is older than Cold War

[@RealMTBAddict]

Number one power in the world 🇺🇲🇺🇲

[@RealMTBAddict]

@@XvonPocalypse lol

[@memo58]

You don't now what is power ..!

[@RealMTBAddict]

@@memo58 I do know what is power!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@memo58]

a modern howitzer clears it away ..

[@KonuralpBalcik]

2K22 Tunguska ever time best

[@TheSLOShadow]

Just wait till u see the mobile anti objects coming toward u laser defense system that can fit in the back of any 1\2ton pickup truck. Also i love the fact Americans are so nice, we made the bullets self destruct after a certain amount of time. I found that out after i watched a cwis for the first time and thought... That is not going to be good to use near people due to the fact it will make it rain bullets somewhere far away

[@user-on2fn5vo1n]

A medium-altitude long-endurance unmanned aerial vehicle flies at an altitude window of 10,000 to 30,000 feet (3,000-9,000 m) for extended durations of time, typically 24 to 48 hours. This list includes both unmanned combat aerial vehicle and unmanned reconnaissance aerial vehicle.

[@bjmgraphics617]

Wow! Our Military can defend itself from hypersonic missiles during terminal stage of flight.Amazing! The analogy is like an outfielder calling I GOT IT, and runs to catch the downward ball. Hypersonic missiles slows down when barring down its target to prevent it to over shoot its destination and during the terminal stage the missile can't maneuver as the distance from its target is the prime objective. The the ball is first hi, it travels very fast and the predictability is not certain as baseballs are known to curve changing direction but it eventually arch downwards going straight to the ground. The ball loses energy coming down and isn't capable to curve. Same physics and principles with hypersonic missiles. Fast flight that can be hard to predict, can move about and finally coming down it's easy to detect and intercept.

[@Ihavpickle]

Real

[@LD-lv7pi]

Would make sense to mount one of those on a Bradley or one of the new light tank. Wait, must of been an enlisted person to suggest that!

[@CorePathway]

Think again, sunshine. Look at the size of the system: it needs tons of ammo, power supply, radar, C and C; a track isn’t big enough. Besides this thing is for point defense. Tm what the US needs is a Gepard clone that actually works, unlike the Sgt York

[@carlodeguzman683]

the whole time i watched this, all i heard was vulcan raven

[@johnd.8224]

Would be a great anti personnel weapon too.

[@enisgolis7142]

Amerika ne Toke. Zoti ne Qiell🎉🇺🇲❤️💪☝️👌

[@rusty2122]

While I was stationed with ADA we had the Vulcan air defense Gatling gun in the 70 s

[@LOLOVAL-os3pq]

I much prefer the Rapidfire from Thales Group, it fires bursts of 4 programmable shells, no need to fire thousands of 20 mm shells, the CTA 40 mm fires very precise small bursts on anything that flies, planes, drones , helicopters or missiles , maximum rate of 200 shells per minute , it can pierce 20 centimeters of reinforced concrete ( 8 inches ) and explode into hundreds of shrapnel in the room behind , shoot down anything that flies and detonate the ammunition above of a wall where terrorists are hiding! simpler and cheaper

[@chrissmith2114]

Agree, SRAM wastes a lot of ammo, but because of its superior fire control system the German Geppard normally manages to down a drone with 4 to 6 cannon shells,

[@tedmoss]

@@chrissmith2114 Three.

[@tedmoss]

More than 20 years difference.

[@chia_pet7121]

Does it come equipped with earplugs?

[@waltermachnicz5490]

Both "not invented here" and "no perceived need" is very Army. Plus the Navy version is built for sea conditions, heavier and dependent on ship crew and probably at least some sensor feed. Truck mounting and support with power and sensors, probably needed in at least pairs to cope with many incoming drones. The ammunition goes quick. I do not know the allocation of shots to assumed distraction of drones. Ships I would think have multiple systems protecting a small area. Protecting Infantry lines and support is moredifficult, line of sight matters.

[@OrIoN1989]

Has there been experiments with it on a Bradly hull or similar?

[@camiller1988]

Guepard?

[@leonardgmiller8924]

Just as good as German 30mm cannon for auto anti aircraft this would be an excellent brother for the Leopard one system

[@gomergomez1984]

Funny already had a vehicle mounted M61 system long before this junk, it was the M163A1 and M167A1, also PIVADS… and you had ground mode which CRAM doesn’t.

[@vinillywonttell2319]

No, no, no, no! C-RAM Soo scary stationary and now they are mobile??? This things freak me out of how smart they are

[@tedmoss]

This device does not need a test, it is deadly.

[@hanbyeongyeob]

대공포 수만발 발사해서 드론 1대 잡는 것이 둉대비 효과가 있을까

[@Ihavpickle]

Maybe a couple hundred, but definitely not tens of thousand

[@nomercyinc6783]

thats already been field tested and proven. its not being testing JUST NOW

[@robertspeakman6523]

It had a gun system once called Sgt. York. But in there ' wisdom ' they canceled it.

[@supersasquatch]

Pro tip: Don't put your fingers in front of the bullets

[@leonardgmiller8924]

How much ammo would the system need to carry and how many personnel are used for each complete unit

[@tedmoss]

Now that's an intelligent question, if you have a ship you can carry all that weight, but not on a much smaller vehicle.

[@Chris1982416]

31 worst brigade getting recognition. My old unit 1-1 ADA getting recognition too.

[@thebritishengineer8027]

Brillaint idea...!! I't not liek the Russians upgraded the single 20mm to twin 30mm cannons firing at 2,5000 rounds a minute then backed that up with 12 SAM's and one of the most lethal mobile Radar Systems in the world. Networked into the worlds first working cross platform battlefield information systems... Oh wait. Nice kit lads, for a stop gap.

[@dongiovanni4331]

It would be a shame if that Russia system were to find itself in HARM range.

[@ShneekeyTheLost]

Unlike the russian system, however, this one is actually functional and hasn't been stripped down and spares sold to keep the crew fed.

[@Ihavpickle]

Nah the russia version looks mid af

[@jdgoodwin3136]

It's like R2D2 with a hard-on.

[@rkmuhammadhaseeb2276]

God bless america

[@marks1034]

One thing that concerns me is what could be hit by all the bullets that miss.

[@johnrogers-ys2lw]

The bullets SELF DESTRUCT before they hit the earth.😅

[@vincegoheen2764]

Basically a 4000 plus Meter grenade launcher

[@user-bv2lr2zs9l]

Anything down range of an incoming hostile is most likely a target

[@gregheitland4392]

Put on the Big Boy pants marks and grow a pair 😊

[@YuriVolzumaru]

If they combine phalanx in tank what would be called?

[@chrissmith2114]

A tankalanx

[@rxonmymind8362]

Genius? Many of us have asked for this exact system for decade. Be pretty useful against drones too and some missiles.

[@petegarnett7731]

Not a new idea. They put them in the back of mule drawn waggons about 150 years ago. Of course the targets were on horseback then. They just advanced the technology a bit.

[@jonjames7328]

THAD has a range of 825 meters to 3000 kilometres. How utterly mind numbing. What would engineers of 1940s Penemunde have made of that?

[@philshifley4731]

Pace of video is way slow. Best watched on 2x speed.

[@ericclausen6772]

Yeah when lasers can't engage because of fog and smoke these could see and engage enemies weapons systems and with a laser mix nothing gets in

[@roncummmings5102]

A laser-guided plasma gun

[@Macjeeh]

Taiwan needs to buy alot of those! Put it along the seashores. I Wana see buncha CCP armies drop like dominoes. Lol

[@saviorvx1883]

i would turn in my towel and mmy beard if i saw this targeting me

[@spikespiegel2740]

Drones nightmare

[@c1ue1]

Genius LOL. This is exactly what happens when you submit a haji technical spec to a US defense contractor: 50x the cost and 1/10th the benefit.

[@leonardgmiller8924]

It needs to be more mobile to be less of a range itself

[@analytics8055]

It's a robot. Welcome to the future.

[@ArnoldVeeman]

2:39 is that a blast hole?

[@THESocialJusticeWarrior]

Better idea: Put it on a C-130 gunship so it can't be shot down.

[@pike100]

A C-130 can't be shot down? 🙄

[@shadowgunner69]

The first AC-130s carried 4 x 20mm gatlings, and 4 x 7.62mm miniguns (1967).

[@THESocialJusticeWarrior]

@@shadowgunner69 , yes, but there were not radar guided and on a gimbal.

[@johnhopkins6260]

CIWS known as "sea-wiz"; ground-based version: "gee-wiz"... With -25°/+85° shredding Russian tanks should be amusing. With reported range of 5 1/2 km, no details of how long the rounds continue to skip merrily across the landscape.

[@ericclausen6772]

30 mm ? or 20 mm?

[@eb5362]

Listen We were sinners and so unworthy Still for us He chose to die Filled us with His Holy Spirit Now we can stand and testify That His love is everlasting And His mercies, they will never end God is good all the time He put a song of praise in this heart of mine

[@markburkill4244]

Give them mini guns and flamethrower clean out the trenches🇨🇦

[@marcosjosesousa4679]

EUA bem gue poderia doar um dessa pra a Ucrânia. Lá seria mas útil

[@user-gx4ef6nv5w]

最新の対空自走砲？

[@ibc5520]

This should be given also to the ukrainians air defense very good at drones too...

[@ericclausen6772]

Why not on a tank body better to get around on like The M60 bodies we probably already have just put new everything in it to modernize it or even on the heaviest M1 Abrams tank bodies to protect it crews from incoming rounds I don't believe that truck is going to protect the crew during it's operation

[@uruguayarms]

Shorad yThad deberín mandar a Ucrania junto con los Gripen y F16.

[@giaunguyen4933]

Máy bay chiến đấu của Mỹ 🇺🇸 là số 1 🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸

[@penroc3]

these have been around for years

[@danylgan4349]

Try firing continuously for one minute.

[@Pferdesalami]

for what?

[@Ihavpickle]

It can fire 2,000 to 6,000 per minute😚

[@user-rf6qr4ow5p]

R2-D2

[@jonjames7328]

For some reason this brings to mind “Forbidden Planet”, Robbie the Robot and the monster from the id as it attacks the relief saucer. This is just what they needed for point defence.

[@robertevans9354]

So we find out after 60 years of development that our old weapons are superior to modern stuff . Ha ha LOL...THIS is rich , that's irony to the tune of trillions .

[@sute4]

I have known the testing of this Land-Based Phalanx for over ten years. It must have been a failure to see that it has not been put into practical use yet.

[@Omegatonboom]

Learning and gaining understanding is never a failure. But to try nothing new is also a failure.

[@wmwillm.strang5957]

NAVY HAS BEEN USING THEM BACK IN, BEFORE "90"s

[@targetaps]

​@@wmwillm.strang5957 They were first produced in the 70s.

[@SandmanAlpha4]

Munitions are very expensive

[@Ray69Smith]

Buddy of mine worked for General Dynamics in the 80's on the phalanx still have the demo VCR tape they gave employee's of it in action !

[@VideoDoesNotLie]

My ears are BLEEDING from the dubbed-in background "music!"

[@mikevars8979]

I thought it was cool when I was in Afghanistan then I seen the Russian Pantsir. We in the US are so far behind in the AD game

[@bozidarskobalj3166]

this ciws so called phaland system works fine on software and as last defense is still very efective clean option and go air traffis excpet good call is upgrade is about 3km range and force 2,5 x more is good above 24 measure strenght is basic level off defense for boat od destrozers or corvette exept bigger ship has like 5 it works slight better then missile defense in intercept besti in use for turn and extra defense other in zone as ship tactical defense surface area and best capabilities are in turn fly which airplane do again to be efective so longer range kind tops peek and zou can forget easy down peek turn and attack as it pushes airplane go high up and even a simple rocket sistem could also do the rest but charging time is problem in big attack so phaland is has bigest is very efective in turn and has certian sound off spin very noticable when airplanes try to attack you just flair them and they avoid so flares flash is also big key defense and destroyers or corvette should have this more flares pack inside since flares are optional use for rocket attacks the bigest range results ae usualy in some mid dsitance between 4 - 6 km after ships hold in line off fire or more in closer range results are to fast often very short time ot react and dangerous outcome as modern ships are to fast and go easy even to close if you do not have enough torpedo power you are cooked also if previous patriot goals are good strength iike 15000 2x more power then standard and longe range the chinese option are counterfited with strength off 25000 or even 30000 which is more strght and goals are simply imporved towards better or more usable teh same thing hapend in torpedo strength which chinse boat have like advantage so in theory chinse boat or even smalled boats ccan easy to task role but have some problems in more combat offense or everything alone and espacialy enoying are submairines with bigger msisile which stand on path and require time to be heated hard and chinse ships soem problems with submarines and lack off potent strength in use in fast deploy numbers off torpedoes but they are powerfull and in manwhile submairnes does that also so chinese boats and destroyers or corvette have some like desired lvl off range use do not cross to much or efectivness drop althow in some action do perform and do earn money well in lets say 2/3 done which is excellent result and no so not money giving away in navy budget back as fpr caracterisicsd off ships chinese ships are on theory fast turnable and sometimes takre time to be fast but usualy faster then us which many times work against then selves not mcuh chance to go fast on positon simply do task role and shwo presence positioning rest do rockets and torpedoes and flars which have more and more modern use and can even easy spark boost defense while do defense and slow down attack and push force to main goals hoever somewhat expoased came aircarier on longer range then 6 - 8 km which absolutelz head no chance and also very favourable is helicopte us eon destroyers as use of airship missile which in closer just help or even sunk but that is like double cargo missile box 4x2 and in close combat kind work then us versions off tools as for helicopter integration in use off combat is proven waste off time but that software use in game simulation and sometimes goes ower a real defense power boat and that to easy a specialy a slight problem are heavy rockets like cj 3 or us big rockekts for large submarines nto recomendable for use as it can cause floods prep weather stage or even typhon showere as terms off efectivness as big powder strength sometimes they can only tease or cause porblems on line stand as subs not so efective as nto so much various weapons for use and if hit on strong defense air a boat or destroyers it evapourate fast and easy and subs lose power and if they head strong torpedoes they are not fast and if spoted to late can do evasive or prevent follow and atack down boats oponents or enemy

[@pike100]

Bozidar, you need to learn how to spell and how to use proper punctuation.

[@richardgillogly4326]

Shows how slow the Army is with Force Protection. Systems for upgrade have been available for years, but US ARMY GENERALs are absolute ID 10 T parts. I have been working in logistics since 1990 with both getting new systems into the military system and then the subsequent fielding programs. Once you see how 'sloth-like' getting advanced or replacement systems, you would fire a lot of people. Because of the incompetence of our logistics procurement system, when we go to war - BE READY FOR BODY BAGS TO BE COMING HOME. Behind the Genius Idea is totally laughable!!!

[@florantemaniwang5096]

⁹⁹⁹⁸8888888888⁸9u88oo⁰0⁹99

[@florantemaniwang5096]

😊

[@florantemaniwang5096]

😊

[@joeshmoe9978]

Woketopian General Mark Milley is too busy pandering to the LGBTQ+ mob, and getting real or imagined pronouns correct, to be an effective leader. 😒

[@tedmoss]

Things shape up pretty fast when the S**t hits the fan.

[@FFF_Trucking]

I like ROKU

[@alexlalonde9708]

Sound waves ,light there skin on fire! And when it feels like your burning(WAR IS LAST THING ON YOUR MIND.

[@guyonnetthierry5298]

il manque le prix.

[@lktan224]

China has them too.

[@Ihavpickle]

Ok, what do they have?

[@DAVIDGREGORYKERR]

Would be useful to knock out Russian Jet Fighters

[@pike100]

David, the Patriot missile systems are used against enemy fighter jets.

[@Ihavpickle]

Yea

[@jorgtanzerjo3633]

Was ist bei einem Schwarmangriff aus verschiedenen Richtungen ?

[@valamaas]

Recommend speed x1.25

[@SeekingTruthAnd]

Do not waste your money and time unless you develop this weapon to shot gun style or spray style. Current style is not effective and you can never shoot down even one single object.

[@normasnokas]

It’s pronounced ‘FAL - ANX‘, not ‘FAIL - ANX’, although its is spelt ‘PHALANX’.