This is the original review of Being There by Siskel & Ebert on "Sneak Previews" in 1980. All of the segments pertaining to the movie have been included.
Пікірлер: 147
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
Just finished watching the film. A supreme achievement of cinema.
@zamiadams43433 жыл бұрын
A masterwork of cinema, genius. They'll never be another Peter Sellers.
@patriceaqa2882 жыл бұрын
Zami Adams what's so interesting about Sellers and this film, is that those making it said he wasn't right for the role, but he was obsessive about making the project. The makers said 'how can you play a role like this?? You're a party guy, a womanizer, a wild character?' He said no he wasn't and that he truly was 'Chance the Gardener.' His only 'true' self was a simple mild mannered man who liked gardening with his mother and enjoying lunch
@davidkidd26444 жыл бұрын
Peter Sellers, what a talent. Sad that he died before he had more great performances like this one.
@ricardocantoral76728 ай бұрын
If he lived 10 more years, I could imagine Joe Dante or John Landis directing Sellers in a great movie.
@exterminator66485 жыл бұрын
Being There was well ahead of its time.
@orangehoof4 жыл бұрын
This film was a very underrated classic. Sellers is a master at subtle humor that doesn't try to club you over the head but just gently leads you until you realize how funny it is. It was also Melvyn Douglas' last performance as well as Sellers' next-to-last.
@kdohertygizbur2 жыл бұрын
Melvyn Douglas made a few more movies after this
@aaronz7056 Жыл бұрын
Hey, those Pink Panther movies rocked, man!
@dmacmillion4 жыл бұрын
This video reminded me of how much I love this movie, it's been years since I've seen it last.
@tomloft20004 жыл бұрын
what's scary is I find myself becoming more like this character.
@scottmoore16143 жыл бұрын
I think the film was way ahead if it’s time!
@shizuokaBLUES3 жыл бұрын
A simple minded gardener ? If so, welcome to the club
@alexthompson95162 жыл бұрын
That's not scary at all. He is gentle, courtly and kind.
@patriceaqa2882 жыл бұрын
@@alexthompson9516 He is what matters in life. He has no malice, he cares about the earth, he holds no ill will to anyone. He treats everyone with kindness and consideration. He's not burdened by lust, greed, or hatred. He likes his meals on time, and he likes to garden.
@ploppill34 Жыл бұрын
This is a very small room
@ronmackinnon9374 Жыл бұрын
If anyone's wondering about the date given - yes, this episode aired in very early 1980. The film was a December 1979 release.
@TruthnautBegins Жыл бұрын
Pretty clear that the idea for Forrest Gump was ripped from being there.
@wickedcoolname3993 жыл бұрын
I really love watching these S&E blasts from the past but I also like re-reading some of Roger's reviews. He was a very talented writer. I wonder if he ever had aspirations of writing a novel.
@zeltzamer40102 жыл бұрын
He co-wrote a Valley of the Dolls remake.
@ronmackinnon9374 Жыл бұрын
@@zeltzamer4010 'Beyond the Valley of the Dolls' was definitely NOT a 'remake.'
@RobertWF424 жыл бұрын
The "sex" scene with Peter Sellers and Shirley MacLaine is in my top ten funniest film scenes. :-)
@bradleyscarton39314 жыл бұрын
"I like to watch"
@maskedmarvyl47742 жыл бұрын
Shirley Maclaine was brilliant. She was completely believable and really made the film work, as much as Peter Sellers did.
@ronmackinnon9374 Жыл бұрын
One thing the hosts didn't mention is that the film is an adaptation of a novel of that same title by Jerzy Kosinski (who also got principal credit for the adapted screenplay).
@brendenkillough3 жыл бұрын
Watched for the first time today and what a masterpiece
@joelesser25502 ай бұрын
Are you being sarcastic?
@jamesdrynan3 ай бұрын
Sellers' finest role! The screenplay is fascinating at showing Chance's simplistic viewpoint being misinterpreted by all he meets. The ending is sublimely enigmatic. Great film!
@mrjasonwhite734 жыл бұрын
Sellers was robbed of an Oscar for Being There
@scottmoore16143 жыл бұрын
He certainly was! If I’m not mistaken, Hoffman won for Kramer v. Kramer (ugh).
@garydeblasio88103 жыл бұрын
@@scottmoore1614 Sellers was totally ripped off by the supremely overrated Kramer vs Kramer.
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
The Oscars don't mean anything.
@kdohertygizbur2 жыл бұрын
That's a tough one, both were brilliant performances
@duderama675018 күн бұрын
The Oscars reward the current political agenda, hence trash like Crash and Million Dollar Baby. Timeless films are rarely understood in their debut.
@philchroniger78393 жыл бұрын
Such an incredibly underrated film.
@joelesser25502 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 This movie bites! Incredibly overrated!
@l.salisbury1253Ай бұрын
Peter Sellers inspiration for his performance was Stan Laurel!
@patrickshields52514 жыл бұрын
I just rented the Criterion DVD version from a library today. I agree with them, great performances from Peter Sellers and good commentary on how people over consume TV rather than reading or writing. Good film.
@luisvaldes15682 жыл бұрын
The last scene of this movie, amazing!
@zamiadams43432 жыл бұрын
amazing isn't it?
@stephaniegormley9982 Жыл бұрын
It's open to interpretation. I see it as all of his 'luck' was actually calculated. They weren't overestimating him. Chauncey was truly a genius disguised as a simpleton. Kinda like Forrest Gump but with a touch of the supernatural.
@orangehoof4 жыл бұрын
Funniest line in the film was Chauncey's black former housekeeper who knows he's an idiot, watching him become a tv star and saying to her family "Mmm hmm. Look at that. All you have to be is white in America to get anything you want!"
@pmjhns3 жыл бұрын
I found this line memorable too!
@JimmyCornPop3 жыл бұрын
She also claims to have raised him. Yet never taught him to read or write...
@maskedmarvyl47742 жыл бұрын
That was my favorite line too, because it was funny And true. A white person is given the benefit of the doubt even when he is speaking like an idiot, while a black person has to prove their competence and worth every day, while still being suspected of "faking it"; regardless of their accomplishments. That was one of the most insightful and true observations of the story, and the writer was brilliant to include it.
@stephaniegormley9982 Жыл бұрын
@@maskedmarvyl4774 I dunno. That writer was white. I think you're giving him too much credit.
@maskedmarvyl4774 Жыл бұрын
@@stephaniegormley9982 , I'm sensing......irony. Maybe even sarcasm.
@ChaunceyGardener2 жыл бұрын
I like to watch!
@tmrezzek5728 Жыл бұрын
Sellers should've won the Best Actor Oscar for this. What blew it is running the outtakes during the final credits--it breaks the spell and you don't leave thinking about the ending; instead you think "Ah, that Sellers! What a card! He never has to act!" So they gave the Oscar to Dustin Hoffman because he "acted."
@afterburner80835 жыл бұрын
Do you have their review of The Shining?
@patrickshields52514 жыл бұрын
They didn't review it on the show because they took the whole summer of 1980 off from television. Gene didn't like The Shining and neither did Roger until he changed his mind and wrote a Great Movies essay in 2006.
@JustWasted3HoursHere4 жыл бұрын
The ending shows how truly and completely innocent the character actually was, as he walks on the water. (No, they're not saying he's Jesus). Very subtle and slow moving, but a great movie nonetheless.
@JustWasted3HoursHere4 жыл бұрын
@trha2222 Not really, just so perfectly innocent that he could do that. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fV66YZ2ord6ZY5o
@johnmaritato35873 жыл бұрын
Sellers was furious about the outtakes shown with the end credits and I don't blame him. Cheapens the movie.
@SallySallySallySally2 жыл бұрын
He should have been furious. There apparently are two versions in distribution: one version with the out-of-sync TV screen behind "The End" and then the "bloopers" behind the credit roll, and another version with the out-of-sync TV screen behind the "The End" but also continuing behind the credit roll. This latter one was on the version I watched when I saw this movie for the first time. I was shocked to see the "bloopers" version on a subsequent viewing. I doubt Hal Ashby was behind this. It sounds like something the distributor would have thought would let them "clouseau" it up to somehow boost revenue or some crazy idea like that. I agree with you that the atmosphere and state of mind one is in at the end of the film is instantly destroyed when the "bloopers" are played. You feel like your two-hour investment in the movie was just snatched away from you. I'll just turn it off when it gets to that in the future. But that Biltmore House is really something, isn't it? "Benjamin Rand" defines the term "living high on the hog."
@nicholasjanke3476 Жыл бұрын
Charlie's Angel's also included a blooper reel in the credits. It's really stupid to put that in the film itself. Leonard Nimoy once got really annoyed when he found out that Star Trek bloopers were being shown at art houses. Leonard Nimoy:"How would Gene Roddenberry like it if I published all his rejected story ideas as ",Gene Roddenberry's bloopers?!" So yeah
@nicholasjanke3476 Жыл бұрын
Hmmmm. Well Sellers was known mainly as a funnyman so the bloopers were probably included in the film itself, as the producers were no doubt leery of Sellers carrying on a part dramatic role and thought it would be a good idea to show some comedic Sellers scenes.
@TJTurnage Жыл бұрын
I always liked this much better than Forrest Gump (even though that’s a good film too).
@JustWasted3HoursHere3 жыл бұрын
When I saw this movie as a kid I didn't like it because I didn't get it. As an adult I really appreciate it though. The ending of the movie, I thought as a kid, meant that he was Jesus who had returned (finally). As an adult I _think_ it means that he was just so completely and truly innocent as a human being that he was practically sinless. I don't know if that's what the creators of the movie were shooting for, but that's how I see it.
@joelesser25502 ай бұрын
I saw it as a kid and thought it was okay. Now I know that it sucks.
@JustWasted3HoursHere2 ай бұрын
@@joelesser2550It's certainly not for everybody and is quite a departure from Peter Sellers' normal work.
@cushyglen42645 ай бұрын
The story was based on Jerzy Kosiński’s own life. The book Being There was ripped off from an earlier Polish novel (Kosiński was Polish). Check out his bio on Wikipedia to see how he led a charmed existence.
@duderama675018 күн бұрын
A highly suspect fellow. I wonder if he faked his death?
@andrewmitchell3933 жыл бұрын
It was a film that was trying to make a statement about the things we naively read into empty slogans, politicians and other people in general but that felt very repetitive after the halfway point. It needed a more fleshed out script.
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
I felt no repetition. What I saw was a progression of absurdity that clearly reflected our society.
@joelesser25502 ай бұрын
This movie bites. Highly overrated
@sireggnog8907 ай бұрын
What lovely movie i watch, sometime very wholesome. I adore love the ending.
@OuterGalaxyLounge4 жыл бұрын
Spot-on adaptation of Jerzy Kosinski's very short novella (a quick read, btw). Interestingly, extrapolating some prescience from this film, we now have a president who doesn't read and only watches TV and speaks in platitudes. The idea of people projecting their own fantasy overlay over what they want a spokesman/leader to be or represent is right where we are now. This film predicted the future idiocracy, unfortunately.
@patrickshields52514 жыл бұрын
In other words, this film predicted Trump.
@yourpalharvey3 жыл бұрын
Lots of people will read this and think, “Trump!” But anyone who lived through Reagan will see there’s a greater truth, not so much about Presidents, but about everything else.
@62Cristoforo2 жыл бұрын
Great observation
@zenpaganwarrior3 жыл бұрын
Just a friendly FYI: I believe Being There actually came out in 1979, but I think maybe you mean this episode of Sneak Previews was early 1980? Love your uploads, Eric!
@Bacalao2929 Жыл бұрын
He’s a very clean
@ploppill34 Жыл бұрын
So is Paul’s grandfather in a hard Days night
@TechnicJunglist Жыл бұрын
Brilliant movie and Peter is wonderful in it. I couldn't stop laughing at his guru like puns he throws out there that people take way too seriously and refuse to hear the truth of what he's actually saying. We need more Chanceys in a world full of nihilism.
@johnskrb26 күн бұрын
The "pre-Thumbs-Up" Era
@williamburke17313 жыл бұрын
The most overlooked and BEST aspect of this film is its' closing shot: Sellers leaves the funeral service to walk alone, mends a small plant in the ground, then walks out ONTO the lake, revealing to the audience that he was JESUS all along! BRILLIANT!
@ericanderson21523 жыл бұрын
incorrect. he was too stupid to sink.
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
Chance walked on water because, unlike the rest of the single minded people who craved power, he was truly free.
@joelesser25502 ай бұрын
@ericanderson2152 That's the best interpretation that I've ever heard!!! This movie bites and the ending invalidates everything that happened in the 2 preceeding hours.
@mrnocal5 жыл бұрын
I saw this movie in the theater when it came out. I was maybe 14 or 15 years old. It bored me. I gave it another chance a few years ago and it still bored me. The performances were excellent and the premise was good, but it just moves so slowly. Just my opinion.
@CaptainSpalding724 жыл бұрын
Because you are dumb... it's far from boring.
@chriswesterfield48184 жыл бұрын
how sad that you never progressed in life............................. I was also 14 or 15 when first seeing it and it bored me. Now? It is an utter masterpiece. What would not bore you? Rambo shooting and blowing up 100 people?
@CaptainSpalding724 жыл бұрын
Get taste..... Its not slow. Slow means nothing happens, not the case....
@CaptainSpalding724 жыл бұрын
The bigger themes escape you obviously.
@porcupinecraig3 жыл бұрын
@@chriswesterfield4818 Hey, different strokes for different folks. Sad that you would think that life progression depends on someone liking a movie. It's just a movie. Maybe you haven't progressed in life if you think a movie is that important.
@alanFconrad6 ай бұрын
I love that movie
@polreamonn3 жыл бұрын
The end credits to this film are a bit odd.
@strangenrare86633 жыл бұрын
Sellers HATED the ending and thought it destroyed the entire illusion of the movie... He fought hard to have it not included, and I think he was right in a way, but it's one of the funniest 2 mins in film history too--and that scene had to be cut because he literally couldn't make it through the delivery without cracking up, so we'd never have heard that dialogue if it hadn't been tacked on at the end. I'd bet it was a tough call for Hal Ashby too.
@ricardocantoral76722 жыл бұрын
That crap should have been removed.
@joelesser25502 ай бұрын
Sellers was a nutter.
@ploppill34 Жыл бұрын
I like to watch
@mikesilva38687 ай бұрын
😊good movie
@stevend.bennett4274 жыл бұрын
What almost ruined the movie were the outtakes during the credits.
@johnnyskinwalker40954 жыл бұрын
I think that was the original ending. It was so funny they should have kept it.
@andymassingham4 жыл бұрын
Steven D. Bennett Sellers was not aware that they had tacked on the outtakes until he saw it in a theatre. He was outraged and fought to get them removed but for whatever reason it didn't happen.
@joycekoch57464 жыл бұрын
Chance has more sense than Jay Powell.
@michaelmohrle17735 ай бұрын
This character reminds me of Forrest Gump.
@geminiifilms67684 жыл бұрын
Kubrick's lost film
@johnbailey28504 жыл бұрын
Funny you say this, because it has so much Kubrick-like qualities. The ending is the biggest similarity.
@geminiifilms67684 жыл бұрын
@@johnbailey2850 From the cinematic aspects to the characters and right down to having Peter Sellers in a wheelchair. Also, the playing of Thus Spoke Zarathustra to the moon landing "set" in the store is pretty intriguing.
@only2572 жыл бұрын
Never heard of this movie 🍿
@joelesser25502 ай бұрын
Which should tell you something
@happierabroad3 жыл бұрын
these two reviewers didn't even notice the obvious freemasonic symbolism at the end, as well as the jesus motif of walking on water. see robert w. sullivan iv for his take on movie symbolism and this film.
@joelesser25502 ай бұрын
🤮 Ugh...shut up with the Freemason B.S
@lindy91964 жыл бұрын
Seems like the atrocious Forrest Gump ripped this off
@CaptainSpalding724 жыл бұрын
Not exactly. Everyone knew Forrest was retarded, but didn't lay some pretentious trip on him. Chancy is simple, but his self-centered, delusional acquaintances, who are the true dumb asses, think he's the second-coming and by Jove he might be thanks to the gloriously wicked final shot.
@johnnyskinwalker40954 жыл бұрын
Funniest scene was in the generic. I think that was the actual ending of the movie but I bet they thought it was too jokey and removed it(that would never happen today lol). But it was so good and funny I bet Sellers said "screw that, we're putting it in" and they do it via blooper. I wish it would have been their ending. Anyway I think the film is about popularity, how powerful it is and at the same time it is absolutely nothing, It is make-believe.
@maskedmarvyl47742 жыл бұрын
This is by far Peter Sellers' greatest performance.
@joelesser25502 ай бұрын
Did you ever see Dr. Strangelove????
@emeraldgreen7773 жыл бұрын
I can't read, I can't write....👍😅
@peterkrug23274 жыл бұрын
Sellers actually died in 1980, the same year this film came out.
@dougr31424 жыл бұрын
The film came out in December of 1979; Sellers died in July, 1980.
@lobo9403 жыл бұрын
Holy crap, it's Elon Musk
@colinbaker39164 жыл бұрын
I didn’t particularly like Being There, but I thought Sellers was magnificent.
@porcupinecraig3 жыл бұрын
Just how I felt. I watched Sellers and his performance, but by the end of the movie, I really didn't like it. Left me feeling like crap, for some reason. Didn't work for me. Too strange, didn't really make sense, not at all realistic, and I thought the whole time that this guy was an idiot and no matter what anyone else thought, he was just a poor idiot. I felt bad for him. And that made me not like the movie. And the ending just stunk. What the......That was like the movie giving me a middle finger. Totally out of left field and made no sense at all.
@ricardocantoral7672 Жыл бұрын
@@porcupinecraig The film was a satire, it wasn't meant to be realistic. Second, why feel bad for him ? He seized a great deal of celebrity and even power without breaking a sweat. Lastly, the way I see ending is it's the act of defiance of those in power. He is truly free hence his ability to defy reality itself.
@62Cristoforo2 жыл бұрын
“The land of platitudes”. Truer words were never spoken, .... and then we had Trump
@ploppill34 Жыл бұрын
Hillary in a landslide
@joelesser25502 ай бұрын
Being There SUCKS!!! I love movies, but this bites. Overlong, over-rated, and heavy-handed. I love movies and Peter Sellers, but this movie is dumb.
@diamonddave165 ай бұрын
This movie was awful
@tentcater47103 жыл бұрын
McLain almost ruins this film like she does all films she’s in!