Ben Has The Time Of His Life Analyzing More Viewer Games

[@siasleopard2668]

Ben really underatands youtube . When people click on a chess video what they actually want is a long rant about tennis .

[@philipsaoud244]

Ben, sometimes novice players can't see how to turn a material advantage into a mating sequence so they try to simplify, even if it means giving back some material. They may justify it by saying, "it still wins", but it's really it's just much easier for them to analyze. I can see how a GM would find that maddening but I can still recall playing that way.

[@ribbonsofnight]

What they should be analysing is how to trade a rook for a rook and moving their king up

[@teefaka]

@@ribbonsofnight says the 900

[@ribbonsofnight]

@@teefaka Exactly. A 900 rated player knows exactly how to not deliberately sacrifice material. Sure I might blunder away my advantage but I'm not going to deliberately blunder my queen.

[@rashmibharti2808]

@@ribbonsofnight I'm 2100 and can vouch that your progress will be indeed better that way since I did it that way as well, running away from analysis will make your brain dull to it and trying analysing as much will slowly but surely increase speed and accuracy and if you combine that with tactics its an easy road to 2000 but it does take time increasing analysing capacity isn't that easy, till then work on getting a material or positional advantage like you said in your comment

[@warrenz597]

That’s not what happened in this game though, he gave his queen for a rook. That’s not not “simplifying”

[@mohammedfathi3592]

I liked the tennis talk. HARSH!! I like when Ben talks about movies and random stuf.

[@kostatsanidis9984]

If these guys are 1900 and 2000 I have hope

[@acsu96]

I didn't realize how right he was about current tennis rankings. holy cow

[@elatedfoe9899]

The analysis videos are very entertaining

[@Alex-ew4ii]

I swear viewer game analysis is my top 1tv series

[@ckaz007]

"You have such a pretty mouth" If only your younger audience knew where this line comes from. I'm an old man, so I know. Quite fitting, since Ned Beatty recently passed away.

[@feitanuwu2584]

Where does that come from(? I'm only 16 y/o lol

[@ckaz007]

@@feitanuwu2584 The movie Deliverance, from 1972. You might be too young to watch that scene. Ask your parents first.

[@rejeskie]

9:09 the British people are furious luckily they're sleeping right now😂😂😂😂

[@ribbonsofnight]

I know of Ash Barty. Maybe everyone would if she hadn't taken a break from tennis to play professional level cricket. (playing for the Brisbane Heat likely meant she was in the top 100 cricket players in Australia at the time and had potential to rise to fame in Australia in cricket)

[@edwardbottle1018]

Absolutely no one: Some person in chat, every 2 minutes: do u remember when u were in michigan and the lansing mini swiss lol years ago

[@UnoCholoLocco]

these guys are 1900 and 2150 ... what a joke

[@emvv3784]

Just goes to show how pathetic chess has become with engines and theory. Theory and memorization carries tactically and creatively dog shit players like these two to rankings above actually good players. Hard to take classical chess seriously any more. Fischer was right.

[@UnoCholoLocco]

@Mym fries

[@mohammedfathi3592]

No amount of memorised opening theory will get you anywhere if you're a shitty player. It's not as if you will be playing Anish Giri or Ding Liren. Your opponent would probably leave theory at move 5 leaving you stranded on your own.

[@HopUpOutDaBed]

in my experience people blunder way more OTB than online

[@rahulkhanduri2471]

@@emvv3784 exactly, that is why I hate memorisation, since the start memorisation of openings, traps make chess boring for me, I am super tactical yet I lose to boring slow, defensive players, I play atleast 300 rating lower than my actual level, I feel bored when someone locks the position, I mean you just made it a dead game, then for what you are playing ?? Oh yes ,winning on time by moving pieces randomly.

[@mreyybree]

He has a point about tennis

[@boba7709]

actually, he has 15 points

[@Lawh]

I just beat a 1700+ with my 1000 rating. I also once would have beat a 2000+ but I ran out of time. Does someone want to analyze those games, since I am not capable of really understanding what happened.

[@teefaka]

Very suspicious

[@3archeryrangesonaneutralis301]

Guess the elo please

[@gana7206]

I learned that in the first game you can still push c5 and then fork the knight with your queen.

[@KrazyKrzysztof]

analyze more of trying to wins games with him on zoom that dude was funny

[@jamesbell1613]

Sinner and Medvedev look really good. Alcaraz just has to get more consistent. Djokovic has a couple more years left. Sinner has been looking really good and has the respect of some of the old players.

[@Neura1net]

This is a great format

[@chilledvibes99]

british person here, Andy Murray is definitely not popular ahahaha

[@dpayO2]

ikr nobody likes him

[@MrCupidd]

Instead of QxPch just penetrate with the queen the fastest way is RH7 and RH8 to trade off a pair of rooks. White was probably upset his was losing his a pawn but overlooked he had a queen for a rook!

[@andrewmckinley2214]

Naomi Osaka is a good female tennis player

[@tauriqabdullah6130]

Please analyze the great game gotcha vs bitch.

[@supermicro9034]

Go ben

[@deterdad]

Amazing

[@emvv3784]

Terrible.

[@kostatsanidis9984]

Hey don't talk smack about our aussie tennis player. 😢

[@kapa1611]

no truth in advertising: it's just "Alalyzing ONE More Viewer GAME" ;) :P

[@chakaula8642]

Frustration from student stupidity is about YOU! GROW BEN GROW... Detach... surrender to their level of incompetence! Aloha

[@gana7206]

pulp fiction was a garbage movie ngl

[@notgarvit]

Incorrect! As per usual.

[@dechain1927]

garbage take