Your review is the best among available KZbin channels in English. I really appreciate your deep knowledge and explanation. Please support to upload more reviews.
@padelfyi2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much! I'm trying to look for retailers to partner with so I can get access to more racket so I can make more reviews.
@panama-canada4 ай бұрын
Great review. Instead of total praise for every single racket, I’m great to hear about their faults.
@padelfyi4 ай бұрын
Down with purely promotional reviews! 💰
@kaidu93Ай бұрын
Have you also tried the Starvie Metheora racket? I'm wondering how it would perform compared to Astrum (both eva 30).
@JonhyyyPistoleiro134Ай бұрын
Thanks for the video! What padel from 2024 your recommend for more control, good sweet spot?
@mohamin47626 ай бұрын
Want your review video on the starvie Triton pro 2024. Vamos
@padelfyi6 ай бұрын
well if i have to…;)
@tseslavnikitin4 ай бұрын
did you get a chance to try the Kenta range? is the so called "normal" Kenta Eternal basically the same racket as Astrum, or does the longer handle give any significant differences?
@tseslavnikitin4 ай бұрын
Also, I think you mentioned that Adipower ctrl 3.2 and 3.3 are basically the same, but I guess you meant Adipower ctrl 3.2 and Adidas Cross ctrl? 3.3 ctrl has entirely different foam and carbon
@padelfyi4 ай бұрын
This video is about the CTRL. Go for the Cross IT CTRL if you looking for something similar to last year's CTRL.
@padelfyi4 ай бұрын
Sadly no. My retailer partner doesn't have a test model for me. But I'm planning on getting rid of my test inventory to free up cash for buying one. If like the Raptor, the Kenta will be more power-oriented. I'm also very curious about the new roughness. I'll post the rackets I'm selling in tomorrow's newsletter.
@spyrosk52674 ай бұрын
Hello. Please I need a racket recommendation. I am a low intermediate right side player. I am better in defence with a good bandeja. I am trying to develop my smash in order to finish more points. I am currently using an adidas rx carbon. Thanks
@padelfyi4 ай бұрын
If the RX carbon is too soft for you - absorbing the ball too much in smashes - the Adipower would be a safe step up.
@spyrosk52674 ай бұрын
@@padelfyi thanks for your response. Do you mean the adipower ctrl ?
@padelfyi4 ай бұрын
@@spyrosk5267 yes
@georgeeeeeeeee81106 ай бұрын
What about the NOX ML 10 PRO CUP? Is in the same play categories as these and im really considering going with it, what’s your opinion?
@padelfyi6 ай бұрын
No. It’s significantly lower balance…so, easier to maneuver but less power.
@kaidu93Ай бұрын
Is Adipower CTRL Team much different from Adipower CTRL?
@padelfyiАй бұрын
yes it’s softer. too soft for me
@unfaizdd7756 ай бұрын
Adipower Ctrl 3.3 vs Metalbone ctrl 3.3?
@padelfyi6 ай бұрын
the difference is very small in 2024. but the metalbone ctrl will be slightly softer and lower balanced. adipower roughness is better. i don’t like the metalbone weight customization, but that’s probably the only reason to go with the metalbone imo.
@georgeeeeeeeee81106 ай бұрын
@@padelfyi oh true! What would you prefer in your opinion? I love your content and would really appreciate your opinion on this
@padelfyi6 ай бұрын
@@georgeeeeeeeee8110 I personally prefer playing with the Adipower CTRL because it's more aggressive. I think the Metalbone CTRL's design is cleaner though.
@SuhiMr5 ай бұрын
Do you recommend the 3.2 or the 3.3 version?
@padelfyi5 ай бұрын
3.2 if you prefer harder (precision), 3.3 if softer (comfort, ease). For myself, I like the CROSS IT CTRL more bc the long handle.
@padelfyi5 ай бұрын
www.padel.fyi/racket-reviews/cross-it-ctrl
@SuhiMr5 ай бұрын
@@padelfyi I have a kuikma carbon hybrid thats too hard for me (cant play with it properly) and also a Fila racket the produces no power. I love the fila's sweet spot, but I need some more power. Which one would you recommend in that case?
@basruijter76534 ай бұрын
@@padelfyi Is that the only difference (apart from the design) from the 3.2 to the 3.3?