BEST NEGATIVE PROGRESSION?! - "Negative Fibonacci" Baccarat System

[@johnmartonbouncewave]

Even though there is no real skill to the game of baccarat...the best success i have seen is when i “follow the wave” whenever player or banker has consistent wins in a row i follow the trend until i loose... been workin for me for 4yrs 💪🏽

[@YarnellCrew]

Following a winning wager, you should move down TWO numbers in the sequence. So if you won after staking 13 units, for example, you’d stake just five units on the next wager. If you won after betting 55 units, on your next wager you would stake 21 units. This rule applies after every win, with the following two exceptions. 1) If you haven’t moved up at least two numbers in the sequence before winning, then you simply start at the beginning again. You start at the beginning of the sequence if at any point you are in profit for a cycle. 2)The second exception in rule three is one of the things that makes this system a little more complicated than others. You have to keep track of how much you are winning or losing during every cycle of the system, so that you know when to finish and go back to the start. This is easy enough when you’re playing online, as you can keep track with a pen and paper or use a spreadsheet. It’s a bit harder when playing in a live casino though, so you need to stay focused. Hopefully you can do this again sometime.

[@raphaeltoh4892]

I think the Fibonacci sequence would only work well playing the thirds on roulette since it has a higher payout

[@johnguance7801]

I believe you have to play what you like and comfortable for you

[@paulmartin3331]

I don't have a system when playing Baccarat, I follow the board.

[@doronreinsager6313]

After watching you play these baccarat strategies, it makes me not want to play baccarat lol

[@becb6936]

Love your videos. Late to the videos. Anyway to get more baccarat videos?

[@bakermotosports]

I was told with this system once you win the first progression you move back one on the Fibonacci system. If you are at 5 Units move to 3 Units. If you loss on the 3 Units you move back to 5 Units.

[@RobertJohnson-je6tx]

Regan Baker You are correct. At one point Timmy had 13units on the the table and won. He went back to 1. According to the system he should have only gone back 2 numbers to 5 and proceeded from there. You do not always go to 1 when you win. If you win with 8 units you go back to 3.

[@bakermotosports]

Robert Johnson so you are going back 2 from where you are at? 5 to 2, 8 to 3, 13 to 5? I was told win at 13 and go to 8. Win at 8 and you should be even. If you lost at 8 go back to 13. Let me know if I’m correct.

[@jimgriffin3623]

The system still loses but you played it wrong. Say you have lost a few and you are at 8 units. You win that so you drop one level to 5 units. If you win that, you go to 1 unit but if you lose, you go back to 8. The point is, you need two wins out of three to recoup your money and restart.

[@shachamarazi3720]

I think if you had mixed in positive regression it would have worked better

[@HuckFillary]

I don't think this is a negative Fibonacci. You're progressing after a loss which is a positive betting progression, I think. I think a normal Fibonacci requires you repeat the same bet after a win and only drop back to 1 unit after two wins in a row.

[@SkillandLuckCRAPS]

My system playing everything banker with this shoe ended with $2267.50 ($267.50 profit).

[@johnguance7801]

Hello, want to join your team! And enhance ideas!

[@farishawatmeh8656]

blocks A +2

[@lenlee14]

I thought with negative Fibonacci you had to stay on the same bet if you win until you recoup your losses.

[@lenlee14]

Oops, I mean regress two steps with each win.

[@zeekflash6924]

Y’all using 8 deck . Or 6

[@ravenoustreasure7452]

Umm you played this way wrong dude

[@tjbrower]

Would have been better off not sticking to player lol

[@Tig.]

The system sucked for you because you played it wrong. after a loss and progression up the chart you only go back 2 spaces. You keep doing this until you get back to the base bet. IE. If you are betting 5 units, then you win your next bet is 2 units. if you win that you are now at the start with the base bet. 1,1,2,3,5. What this does is gives you more chances to not bust than martingale does. What it lacks vs martingale is that you need to win when you are on a base bet to gain anything, however, you never give back those wins unless you leave on a losing streak or you bust. I use this strategy on the negative side on blackjack. It works even better there because of splits, doubles, and BJs. If I lose on any of those I dont change the strategy, I just consider that extra a loss of profit. its the only way my profit goes down at all, but its worth it because when you win the doubles, splits (both) and BJs it most always brings you right back to base so you are set to profit on the next hand.

[@farishawatmeh8656]

nice +3