Best of Viola Da Gamba | Marin Marais Follies & Sonatas

[@TachanMabolo]

I was also able to appreciate the wonderful painting Tuin der lusten.

[@symphonyBAUHAUS]

It's so huge and incredibly detailed! Which scene is your favourite?

[@hankdusommeil1065]

wonderful version Sonnerie, beautiful

[@jean-marcvivier7187]

MAGNIFIQUE

[@christineholbrook1107]

Thank for uploading this beautiful music .

[@symphonyBAUHAUS]

Thank you for taking the time to appreciate it! 🖤

[@Neo-Nocturne]

never had a chance to see this masterpiece in detail, and this antique viol sounds incredible! Very unusual video

[@symphonyBAUHAUS]

The amount of details is insane indeed! Which scene is your favourite? 👀

[@ursulazangl1655]

Sehr schön,vielen Dank!

[@symphonyBAUHAUS]

Vielen Dank auch! 🥰

[@Nikita-og4mb]

Great animation! Surprising match with the music

[@symphonyBAUHAUS]

We wanted to create a unique stylistic combination. Glad you liked it, thank you! 💖

[@nikobagratuni2552]

Very beautiful!

[@symphonyBAUHAUS]

Thank you! 🥰

[@avataranadi]

Where is this place that you find public domain gamba recordings of this quality? Why does the public domain recordings not list the artists names? The only recordings I find that are in the public domain are antique recordings. These recordings are clearly not antique. Where do you find them, I am sincerely interested.

[@symphonyBAUHAUS]

There are many websites, where you can find public domain records, among which imslp.org, archive.org, musopen.org and commons.wikimedia.org Those don't just include the old records with expired copyright - though some of those can be remastered too - but also those that are intentionaloly licensed in a way that allows royalty free redistribution. Some come with a CC BY-SA 3.0 and contain the information about the performer, some CC0 ones don't. Either way, thank you for expressing your concerns! We now realise how important it is to be more precise and transparent about our music sources. We'll look for the appropritate credits once again, perhaps we've missed them somehow. This was one of our first videos, after all. Once again, thanks for taking the time to comment, it's crucial to learn what kind of questions the viewers have about our content, so we can provide the answers. P.S. Some records are indeed incredible commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Marin_Marais_(1656-1728)_%E2%80%93_Sonnerie_de_Sainte-Genevi%C3%A8ve_du_Mont_de_Paris_The_Bells_of_St._Genevieve_from_La_Gamme_et_Autres_Morceaux_de_Symphonie_(1723).ogg

[@smoath]

👍🏻

[@avataranadi]

Who are the performers? You even credit the variety of video editor you use but you do not credit the performers???? Is this to deny the performers royalties?

[@symphonyBAUHAUS]

the performers are not credited here because the pieces were found in the public domain, musicians unknown. Rest assured though, KZbin automatically detects every piece of licensed / copyrighted music, even if it's just a few seconds. So if any creator uses that kind of music, the music owners automatically get 100% of the revenue and the video editors get nothing. The real issue is that the automatic music detection is often wrong, and pretty much anyone can claim the music as theirs without having to prove it. And since all the classical tunes have been performed many times before, this means that big corporations like Sony and Warner own countless tracks - that sound similar to other performances of the same pieces. And that any piece you perform can be claimed by them without proof, and they would be receiving all the revenue until you proove it's rightfully yours (which takes about a month). Also, the performers never get any royalties from these corporations. In conclusion, any channel you see using music that is not performed by them on youtube is either of these 1) a creator using public domain music (copyright free) pieces to showcase other type of work 2) a creator whose earnings all go the the owner of the music (automatically, even if it's two seconds of the tune they've used). Besides, using someone else's music not only means you will earn nothing, it also means your video can be blocked and your channel penalised. In conclusion, only those willing to profit solely the music owner and earn nothing but the threat of being bliocked themselves would and technically could "deny the performers royalties". KZbin makes it impossible. Except, of course, for the the big corporations it has an agreement with. Now they are the onyl ones that can steal anything they do now own from any of us. Without proof too - in one click without consequences.