BEST SUDOKU Sue De Coq Video Ever! Sudoku Advanced Tutorial 15

[@SmartHobbies]

Join the Smartie Party now to get EXCLUSIVE reward puzzle packs, ad free content, discord access, and so much more 👉www.buymeacoffee.com/timberlakeB/membership Time Stamps 00:53 Definition 01:50 Sue de Coq Example 1 07:15 Sue de Coq Example 2 13:02 Sue de Coq Example 3

[@thomaswilke6312]

“This is the best ever Sue de coq tutorial that you will ever find on KZbin and the last example is one that you will not find anywhere else on KZbin” My expectations are so high now

[@brucewayne2091]

I started watching the Swami again. I do believe he's left YT. Last video upload was 2 yrs ago. I watch dxS occasional thanks to your recommendation but I find CTC much more entertaining. This was an interesting tactic: thanks for highlighting it.

[@SmartHobbies]

You are welcome. Swami said a few months ago he was considering a come back but I think life events have delayed that. CTC is great fun to watch.

[@alexanderstelmakh8906]

Special tnx for linking examples and other explanations.

[@SmartHobbies]

You are welcome, Alexander. Thank you so much for watching. Were you familiar with Sue de Coq before this tutorial?

[@alexanderstelmakh8906]

Yea, I intentionally searched for a detailed guide and your video is the perfect match!

[@hansburch3700]

Jetzt ist im 3. Beispiel das Sue de Coq doch zum Vorschein gekommen, ohne die 2 Zellen in J hätte ich das nie begriffen. Logik ist für mich der Hauptgrund um mich damit zu befassen, nicht die Geschwindigkeit.

[@SmartHobbies]

Makes sense. After reviewing the comments from the original video, i saw that the continuous loop was easier to spot. I wanted to show the different strategies to help solvers with future puzzles. Thank you so much for watching, Hans.

[@fubaralakbar6800]

In the first example, the 9@IV6 and 3@V6 cannot both be true, because that would result in 24@IV5, 24@V4, and 24@VI4. Since the 9 and the 6 have separate strong links with 9@V4 and 3@VI4, either 9@V4 or 3@VI4 must be true. Now then, 3@VI4 => 3@IX2 => 6@VI2 => 24@IV5/VI6 => 9@V4, therefore V4=9.

[@SmartHobbies]

Thank you so much for watching and for sharing that logic with us.