Best Way To Learn Physics

[@lunhing5308]

Man’s didn’t blink even once 😂

[@firegamer9774]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@notagain3732]

He blinks in his imagination so it still counts

[@poljakov13]

must be A.I

[@nguyenkhoa71]

They don’t call him the sorcerer for nothing

[@69erthx1138]

Great question Sorcerer. 1) How? Be obsessed with learning physics! 2) Best books? Personal favorite, Mathematical Methods in physics 3rd & 7th Ed. You can even get the PDF free online. This book covers all areas of modern physics, been using it for 27 years. As for any others, texts that don't have answers in the back, nor a solution manual. I do prefer hints in the exercises. Believe this builds confidence in the research mind. Also, looking at the material in the chapters and challenging yourself to create additional problems can build insight. 3) When to? Any damn time you can! Take Einstein's advice, consider study a privilege, not a chore.

[@Pain544]

Can you send the link to that? Or tell me the name of the writer of the book

[@Rond33]

Thank you for the reference. As you stated the book was free online in pdf

[@AlexandreLucianoCarneiroPerusi]

I really can't find these books online

[@Ishfaqmajeed476]

Cam you tell me author name

[@bl-nb8fo]

If there's no answer, how will I know I understand the concept if I can't check my answers?

[@xirsixussien7303]

1. Physics for scientists and engineers by Douglas Giancoli. 2. Mathematical methods for the physical sciences by Mary Boas. 2. Classical mechanics by Taylor. 3 Introduction to electrodynamics by Griffiths. 4. Principles of Quantum mechanics by Shankar. 5. Introduction to Thermal Physics by Daniel V. Shroeder.

[@BennettAustin7]

I had really great professors, to me that is the best way. Just asking them questions. Very different from math I’d say, which was much more independent and isolated by just reading a book alone at a desk

[@edwardsmith-rowland2852]

One of the first things my first year physics professor said was "Students worry about 'Physical Intuition' - what is it, how do you get it, etc. Physical Intuition is what you get after you work a bunch of problems."

[@MrKyltpzyxm]

Intuition is made, not born. 👍

[@tobiasmelgard2070]

Hey I would love for someone like you to answer my question about this. I dont really have anyone else to ask tbh. I am now 20 years old and have this last year really found some passion and love for engineering and physics. The problem is im not really naturally good at it. Im as Average as you can think. So i decided i would start Learning on my own outside school all by myself. So I picked up a high school physics 1 book and have done about half the book in a month now. Sure it may seem fast but that does not mean i have learned the material. All the Pages have been read and i have done every question. There is some problems with it tho. I dont really know of this is the way to learn physics. Sure i can solve basic physics questions on like mechanics and some thermodynamics (i think thats what it is called in America). But i dont really feel like im truly understanding alot tbh and i want that intuition every other scientist wants. That deep understanding like Feynman is just amazing and i want to know How that feels. Is the riddle to Learning physics just doing a shit ton of questions and math to back that up? Can i truly understand physics that way? Or is it better ways? Thats kind of what ive been doing so far. If you see this, truly thank you for your time:)

[@edwardsmith-rowland2852]

​@@tobiasmelgard2070 I think working problems from books is a solid way to learn how to do physics and eventually understand it. I agree with The Math Sorcerer that it's best to find books that have at least some answers in the back if you are self studying.. You could work on explaining physics in words to yourself or other people. Another whole thing that you have access to that I didn't when I was learning in the internet: KZbin videos such as this channel, and Sabine Hossenfelder, and Anton Petrov are favorites of mine and more physics oriented. These are general interest and not teaching though. There is MIT Open Courseware with excellent lectures. Search physics on YT and look at some of them to see which ones you like. Where are you in maths? Do you have calculus? Let me know how it goes. Good luck!

[@edwardsmith-rowland2852]

@@tobiasmelgard2070 I thought I had answered this but I guess my comment got eaten. Anyway, picking up a few physics books, reading them, and working the problems - _lots_ of problems - is the beast way to develop intuition. That said, you can expand on that in a number of ways. If you learn from pictures as I do, sketch the problem situations. Plot the results of physics equations - does some solution exponentially grow, or shrink? Is there some long term asymptotic value? Does it blow up somewhere? Why? Another way to learn is to explain verbally and in writing the physics you are trying to learn. Finally, you could try to program little simulations on a computer and see if you can get good answers. Also, nowadays there are great videos on KZbin and MIT Open course ware for example. Have fun!

[@tobiasmelgard2070]

Wow Thanks for reading and for an answer! That said i have picked up maths as well now with physics. I think you are right. I have picked up alot by doing ALOT of questions. I will keep doing that. Will look into khan academy. visuals do really help for me also. So will try using that more from now on.

[@aanifshabir8009]

Man looks like Newton's twin😂

[@LevernOlivier]

Lol

[@charlesbaoumar]

So helpful. Thank you for this amazing video!

[@LaughingManRa]

The best way to learn physics is similar to the best way to learn math: use lots of sources, and drill lots of problems!

[@energyeve2152]

Something that has helped me tremendously, is solving easier problems close to the problem at hand.

[@83jbbentley]

If Lebinz and Newton invented Calculus to explain natural phenomena is it conjecture to say that their is maths that need to be created to explain cosmological phenomena?

[@Taigokumaru]

Once in a while I hear someone ask: "Is math created, or is it discovered?" To which I say: Both. We discover phenomena and then invent tools which we use to discover more specific phenomena. Repeat process.

[@ryanthomas7119]

​@@TaigokumaruIt's not both. It's a human invention to make sense of reality. It's created.

[@enziiiiii_]

I think newton invented the iphone im not sure

[@Burntchrome]

​@@ryanthomas7119not really. The cosmos runs on Maths, it made sense to us not because it bent to our rules but because it was a priori. It was meant to be found out and we only invented a language through which we understand the maths of the universe. It was deeply hidden in the sense that our eyes and brains took time to discern its mechanisms which we are still doing. So it was discovered but we invented the logical systems to make sense of it like we know the abstract concept of heat or happiness but there are already words to express these experiences so you can make sense of them.

[@aoooriel2361]

Makes sense . ​@@Burntchrome

[@willpotter22]

Switching from electrician to electrical engineer and want to teach myself all the math and science with a bunch if textbooks and such before starting the degree in a couple years! We CAN DO IT

[@MichaelWaisJr]

I saw a meme cover to a fake math book once. It was pretty funny. It said, “Math: Way More Fun on Acid”! 😂

[@OrdenJust]

I have heard it said that the only way to truly learn a subject is ...to teach it! (Obviously, one must study it first, but only after having to teach it to someone else does one truly learn it.)

[@douglasstrother6584]

Learn to draw diagrams well, and construct a solution based on physical principles. This can be applied to "block on an inclined plane" problems to more complex ones in electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, etc.

[@greentheam629]

Man what are these edits 😂

[@triple_gem_shining]

Pointless

[@rittickkumar8536]

The best way to learn physics is simple be honest to yourself continuously Ask questions too relate your question in real practical world don't believe to someone, satisfy yourself.

[@saunakroychowdhury5990]

Where are the answers?

[@fredharvey2720]

Why isn't he blinking

[@dinorex4859]

He has the ability to start a podcast

[@Next_180]

Actually he is asking the best way to study physics

[@garrettmcnulty1522]

“It’s all relative”

[@gerardzi7930]

Springer Books are really good !

[@taz0il]

Do you have any recommendations for a high schooler?

[@chad_dogedoge]

Can you review , Wolfgang Nolting - Theoretical Physice , what is the difference between the books by Greiner?

[@dyzphoriia]

i love math and physics but i hate reading. the problem is physics is a lot of reading and trying to understand text so.. yay

[@tamasburik9971]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@ufairuzman2621]

Longlegs?

[@hassnainayub648]

Can anyone suggest me i want become researcher in physics but i did graduation in computer science

[@TheInterestingInformer]

So many questions, not enough answers 😩 😩

[@EddieSipes]

Nobody buys books no more

[@ZetQo]

Physic is better than Hyra

[@manaoharsam4211]

Let me tell you my background first. I have a degree in Engineering Mechanics with background in solid Mechanics. I worked for ten years at Boeing as loads and dynamics Engineer, did lots of finite element analysis. Worked on space shuttle program. Saw lots of application, made the job really interesting when less paper work was involved . Did lot of flight flutter testing, flow induced vibration loads. But in 2009 my wife passed away. Sold my big house and bought a very small house and said I want to really learn other things like physics. I picked up book by Hussein Yilmaz, I got lost reading this book. The relativity part was OK. But when started talking about Dirac Spinors , Stress Energy Tensors, I was completely lost. So I must have picked up the wrong book. Besides it was not like Engineering where you can put a physical meaning. Then I picked up Ashoke Das on Quantum Field Theory. Understood the Math this time , and all about spinors etc, only to the mathematical extent. Became very sad, read all the math , understood all of it mathwise , but really could not put some sense into it. Maybe I was just a beginner here. Because my encounter with Michio Kakus book was disappointing. It did not have step by step approach like Ashoke Das book. So long story short , I see there are lots of physics books written without consideration to walk you through it. If you are on your own , and if nobody tells you the correct book to read first you will feel it is very hard. No nothing is really hard. I used to teach undergraduate students who got nothing above a C , and after teaching most got A or B s. Even the Dean got a letter from the students saying that he is a best teacher you will find in 100 yrs. Nothing is hard, if you want to cook a dish , you use certain ingredients, and follow step by step procedure. Unfortunately in physics books mostly are written not in a way like Engineering books. If we don't make these books interesting we will make some very curious minds run away from physics. You don't make string theory look like it is from other world. Actually you should write the Book by

[@firegamer9774]

Bro explain in short I am lazy😢

[@somerandomboi8239]

​@@firegamer9774Every 60 seconds in Africa, a minute passes. Don't be lazy.

[@DrSoda.]

Everything that exists, has existed, or will exist came from the mouth of God. He sits on His throne in the Kingdom of God and speaks things into existence. He controls all with His Word, Jesus Christ. He has always been and always will be. This is the LORD. This is the truth.

[@d3wolfgaming695]

Cheap copy of Einstein😂

[@jeetdhibar7997]

Teel me the answer

[@manaoharsam4211]

So Actually you should write a book on string theory written by Barton Zweibach. In fact his Quantum Mechanics lectures are great offered in MIT open coursework, free for all. Just Google you find them. Yes we need teachers like Barton Zweibach.

[@Neo-Reloaded]

The best book is introduction to string theory by Barton Zwiebach