Smallest Mini Aircraft In The World

[@BeyondFacts]

Make Sure to Watch the *Inside Marine One, The $237 Million Helicopter* 🔥 kzbin.info/www/bejne/gYmcqYBqbNBmo7s 🔥

[@glbaker5595]

You I will not watch anything else from beyond facts you are nothing but a liar like all of the media that is running this country, anything that I find lying anymore like your Photoshop I will never participate with again

[@zachh5812]

Clickbait BS!! Boooooo

[@B-A-L]

Nah, I'm fine thanks

[@Tinku1899]

Still using clickbaits? It's 2015 or what??

[@jenslundy]

Are you going to shout to "SMASH THE LIKE BUTTON" in that video too?

[@HangTimeDeluxe]

That thumbnail is the literal definition of "clickbait."

[@SophisticatedDogCat]

Oh yeah, I came here just to downvote.

[@oatlord]

? The second one is the same plane, no?

[@TheWabungus]

My guy has no legs XD

[@jaimdiojtar]

the vide wasnt bad but 1 narrator is annoying and i saw again the thumbnail fake as fuck that image

[@MrCageman]

Indeed. Better clickbait examples will be hard to find. Downvoted.

[@Dead1yM]

Your Thumbnail is Illegal

[@Insertchashorslepaymenttpye]

It is

[@Eman_likes_all_hobbies]

How???

[@Dead1yM]

​@@Eman_likes_all_hobbiesImagine my disapointment when I didnt get to see the deformed pilot depicted in the thumbnail in more detail.

That's EXACTLY what I was going to say. I'm so tired of people wasting my time by putting a more than hilarious thumbnail up to get me to click on their dumb ass video, only to find the object or person or whatever it is, isn't in it.

[@jtuttle11]

I guess Photoshop can make anything possible.

[@djvcreations9568]

yea that thumbnail

[@shekharmohite7695]

Not photoshop, engineer can make anything possible 😎

[@djvcreations9568]

@@shekharmohite7695 bro where are his legs in the thumbnail?

[@kurtreber9813]

T.O.B.A.L.

[@drivinmiatas5068]

maybe he’s an amputee lmao

[@johnevatt518]

This has to be the best clickbait photo I have ever seen congratulations

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi John, thanks for your nice comment 🙂 Hope you have a great day

[@HarryPorpise]

@@BeyondFacts he wasnt saying that in a good way.

[@LukaArtelj]

@@BeyondFacts Only stupid people use imperial. 95% of the world uses metric units. Looser!!!

[@trafficjon400]

they so small

[@squarewalnut240]

@@LukaArtelj ouch 😢

[@billarroo1]

Some of these planes looks as if there isn't enough wingspan for a liftoff, but they do !! Great Engineering.

[@brsrc759]

In reference to the thumbnail..... I didn't know Lieutenant Dan had a pilot's license

[@saraspitefull32]

🤣 lmao

[@Roycebert]

He wanted to try our his air legs

[@saraspitefull32]

@@Roycebert he would be trying his sea legs trying to fly that sploooosh

[@bexraphaela]

I can't believe that you can get a plane for the price of a small car... That's amazing!

[@DownhillAllTheWay]

Oh, man! My _like_ button didn't work. I smashed it.

[@thebonesaw..4634]

With the twin Williams FJX-1 engines, the CMC Leopard had a *top speed of 540 mph,* not 345 (and this plane was designed in the 1980s). It had a pressurized cabin with a service ceiling of 55,000 feet and a climb rate of 6,340 feet per minute. With those specs, *the plane could have flown coast to coast in about 4 hours.* Unfortunately, due to suppliers going out of business, the project became stalled. Eventually, the owner of the project passed away, and it seems likely that this plane will never ever achieve commercial success.

[@mr.america9806]

Do you know the cost of purchase and ownership ?

[@thebonesaw..4634]

@@mr.america9806 -- Is your google broken? Sure, I've got nothing better to do, I'll be your personal assistant. Says here the purchase price of a Leopard Six (which seats six peoples) is $2.35 million American dollars. Operating costs are going to be a bit harder since the damn thing isn't operational yet; but... using a Lear 60 (which seats 9, including the pilot and copilot) it costs a bit over $800,000 per year for 200 flight hours, or... $1.2 million for 400 flight hours. HOWEVER... the thrust of a single Pratt & Whitney PW305A on the Lear 60 is 4,700 to 8,000 lbs. While the thrust of the Williams FJX-1 is a scant 700 lbs (the Leopard six is tiny). Ergo, fuel costs are going to be massively lower. I would estimate it would be well bellow $300,000 per year for 200 hours of operation.

[@taechandler5443]

Who gives af if you went to google

[@astrokoi]

its a tiny concorde

[@keithstarkey5584]

At this point, hey, just flap your arms and you're good as gold!

[@BeyondFacts]

😂 Best comment of the day ❤ Hope you enjoyed the video

[@Bidness100]

😂

[@audemars_piguet13]

Yoooooooo hahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha

[@pxnkskies9008]

Lmfao

[@naijapilotxmax6006]

I love how you concluded the video; flying and fearing for our lives isnt a definition of fun.

[@Kimdino1]

I would have 'Like'd but I smashed the button as you requested. So now, I don't think I'll 'Like' now because of the hassle you caused me in having to repair it. ;)

[@Endoplasmic-Reticulum]

“Are you ready for this?!?!” 🥱

[@Farweasel]

Jet pack can 'only' reach 6,100. But as most pilots need to start sipping Oxygen at 10,000 feet and 6,100 metres is roughly 18,400 feet You may never know what happened before you fell out of the sky unconcious. (OK I would love one anyway but ......)

[@robertgrider4346]

With enough pot& alcohol, one could get ready for anything 😄👍

[@RC-Flight]

I used to work for the company that made the twin engine at the beginning of the video, in the early 80s. In Canada it was called the cricket. In France it’s called the Cri Cri. The wing ribs were made of foam they were cut out then baked in an oven to harden them.

[@npc6817]

Further proof that the french will ruin any word they spell

[@bobs8005]

So if you didn’t bake the foam it’s likely to snap?

[@RC-Flight]

@Bob S The foam come in a state that is easy to cut, with an exacting knife. But once it is baked it becomes stronger and more rigid and firm. The product is called Klegocell.

[@edsonnunes5281]

@@npc6817 9

[@kozatas]

@@RC-Flight Dude, do you know an affordable flying unit, price is around a motorcycle price?

[@GSS_94]

Tata: Nano car 🚗 for under 2000$ Michael: Plane for under 1000$

[@Bhatt_Hole]

I just love this type of fun, wacky, kookie, high energy narration! It's so unique and entertaining! ....said absolutely no one, ever!

[@mousevision661]

*are you ready for this?* You're right

[@plica06]

Normally hate KZbin fake thumbnails but this was kinda hilarious.

[@orange70383]

Every kid needs a mini-jet fighter. I could imagine our neighborhood against the Grover street kids, 6 of us against 6 of them, a dozen 12-year olds with wing mounted paintball guns blasting each other out of the sky.

[@stanleybuchan4610]

.......and getting yourselves killed. Parents would love that idea!!

[@jazemkrzysio]

Great fun watching it! Some of them look as if made for legless pilots only!

[@Eradicationist]

wow asking to hit the like button twice...some tenacity

[@BeyondFacts]

I need them 🙄 Hope you understand

[@boataxe4605]

Bad photoshop work on the thumbnail, the scale is off, there is clearly not enough room for the pilot’s legs and feet on that model airplane.

[@joshhayl7459]

🔵 That's actually NOT a "Model" airplane, the picture is of an actual flyable human carrying aircraft, it's just that they've enlarged the pilot so apparently only his torso seems to fit in there!..... Bad-Photoshop, really-bad.

[@johnmarshall4442]

Stupid photo shopped !

[@murrayedington]

I assumed he was a double amputee - just arsing about!

[@boataxe4605]

@@murrayedington 😂

[@therainforest4314]

Wow! I am totally impressed with this tiny plane. Incredibly cool. :)

[@stoweby]

Welp, hope the thumbnail was worth it.

[@kyleramsumair2001]

They did him a terminator torso and shot off his below 😂

[@daylightangel1494]

Got me lol

[@malibustacy3606]

The thumbnail's got some good entertainment value.

[@adcraziness1501]

These little guys are way faster than I thought they would be! Must be the short wingspans.

[@williamrvilsack8367]

LOVE THIS KEEP IT UP BILLV

[@Kuhnaydeein]

Going electric doesn’t make your vehicle “zero emissions” because many MANY emissions are created gathering the materials and electricity for the vehicle.

[@xu1net]

So True! Maybe you should tell the NZ Govt. that

[@flyingmec378]

Asolutely! Otherwise you could also say that all your household appliances are zero emission. But hey they do turn off street lights during daytime for some reason?

[@blagoev3491]

Actually, the engines of the plane were replaced with a mini jet engines, not electric, so it ia far from eco friendly

[@Zigblat]

Yes, it does make it zero emissions. Emissions created in production are not the same as emissions created by the product. It's always odd when people claim this. Regular ICE automobiles are created using vastly more emissions but the emissions in production are not counted. It's just nonsense to attempt to belittle electric vehicles this way as if no one knows.

[@chevyon37s]

Emissions are considered what the vehicles emits as its in use. You’re referring to the carbon footprint, which is the total of emissions from production and over the life cycle of the vehicle. Yea it sounds simple to just call it the emissions. But the greenies and climate change crazies use it as marketing and I’m glad people are starting to wake up to the BS that is “zero emission” vehicles.

[@yujiro5827]

that is totally the most realistic thumbnail

[@SLJ2137694]

Electric engines? They are electric MOTORS!

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi Steven, thanks for your comment. I'm sorry for the mistake your absolutly right, sometimes I mess up and it's super hard to find own mistakes. Hope you still enjoyed the video 🙂

[@Andythemanman3]

Hi Steven, thanks for the comment. Shut the hell up. The end.

[@Borderline4456]

@@Andythemanman3 LOOOL

[@maxsparks5183]

You’re quiet right, but considering that for over 100 years the world has called outboard engines by the “outboard motors” moniker I think it’s about time a motor or two is allowed to claim they are engines.

[@wedgie502]

the difference between a motor and an engine is that a motor can be reversed without the use of a gearbox.

[@rasinaajay9449]

Best thumbnail in the world

[@californiadreaming9216]

The Leopard is a fascinating mini-jet. If ever put into production, and if relatively affordable, it would surely attract buyers because with a range of up to 2200 miles it could, theoretically, be used to fly trans-oceanic North America to Europe, with a refuelling in Azores. My my my. Your own personal 2 or 4 seater affordable mini-jet. Yep.

[@Builder99]

is their a bathroom in it ??

[@californiadreaming9216]

@@Builder99 probably not. If not, easy fix. An RV toilet and a curtain. Problem solved. Good point though. For a longer flight, 8-10 hrs, a toilet would be wise. I have to admit, the concept of an affordable personal aircraft which can go trans-oceanic is one which fascinates me very much. Imagine flying directly, SE US to Europe with/without a fuel stop in Azores then buzzing around country-to-country touring Europe in your own personal aircraft, then flying back home. As of now, this dream is achievable only for the very wealthy... Why???

[@SuperCanuck777]

@@Builder99 Ya hole in the fuselage

[@R1davies]

Me reading your comment before watching. Oh that's why they the fastest cat on land

[@carlosgarcia-jz3dq]

@@Builder99 all you need is a toilet seat and an ejection port

[@cristiangiggs758]

What a great vid!

[@drewlovelyhell4892]

I just clicked on this to confirm that the thumbnail had been photoshopped. Where the hell are that guy's legs supposed to be?

[@theflyingbyrd417]

If you look close enough you can see where they put the man in the photo

[@Paul_Wetor]

You'd think those short, stubby wings couldn't lift even a small airplane. This video shows that they sure can. Amazing!

[@LeMatt87n]

I dreamed I few one of these as a kid before I knew they existed. I WANT

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi Classics of Design, thanks for your comment. Which one is your favorite? Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

[@APerson-ni1gb]

Legendary Thumbnail

[@donmoore7785]

The random and inane "smash that like button" interruptions are what earned the down vote.

[@helicoptersandmore5519]

I love how you respond back to most of us!!!🔥🔥🔥

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi Helicopters and More, thanks for your nice comment. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

[@helicoptersandmore5519]

@@BeyondFacts Yes I did indeed all I can say is keep them coming!🔥

[@BeyondFacts]

@@helicoptersandmore5519 glade to hear you liked it. Did you already subscribed 😊

[@helicoptersandmore5519]

@@BeyondFacts Yes I did when I found this channel!🔥

[@BeyondFacts]

@@helicoptersandmore5519 thanks so much. Really means a lot to me 🙂

[@bridges5659]

Great video., 👍

[@RCHeliJet]

My Favorite the BD-5 :) thumb up very nice Video.

[@Aaron-zu3xn]

surprised you don't hear about more of these bringing drugs over the border from mexico tbh

[@j.thomas7128]

I got to fly the BD-J once. It was thrilling and absolutely the most terrifying experience at the same time. @aaron, these planes are far too small to carry any useful payload. Drones would be a far more useful option.

[@o.m.b.demolitionenterprise5398]

It’s shit clickbait

[@passage2enBleu]

Was this not designed by Jim Bede? No mention made of him. He was legend with homebuilders back in the 80s and 90s.

[@khaleddahan2996]

Very nice Thank you for the video

[@jeffrobarge6378]

Back in the early 80's there was a guy that used to frequent the FBO I worked at at Hawthorne, CA (KHHR) who had built a CriCri (Cricket) that he used to show off at local and regional airshows. I remember that the plane was painted with a green that very much matched the name of the plane... CRICKET. I don't even remember his name, but do recall that he was a pretty big dude and was always impressed that he even fit into the cockpit, much less flown the thing. Last I heard was that this guy died in some sort of incident with the plane.

[@andrewphillips6563]

The "Corvair" B-36 is actually the Convair B-36 that the Goblin was designed to accompany.

[@reelreeler8778]

yes I also had to LOL at "Corvair", and the Convair B-36 wasn't shown in this video nor was it a WWII aircraft either.

[@the_mowron]

It "only" goes up to 6100 meters. I would definitely need an oxygen supply at that altitude.

[@Knightfang1]

Im gonna guess he meant feet not meters 6100 m is 20,000 feet

[@painkillerjones6232]

@@Knightfang1 30,000is normal cruise altitude, of course, that's in a pressurized cabin...

[@JayneAmos]

200 mph at 20,000 feet you'd need de-icers on your eyebrows....

[@iamgates7679]

Just some feedback: your “smash that like button” interlude is incredibly cringy, feels manipulative and is super jarring to headphone users. I would likely avoid that if you can in the future - add some subtle reminder bumps rather than blowing my eardrums out :) cool video otherwise, thanks!

[@donmoore7785]

Yeah that's why I down voted.

[@AuRowe]

@@donmoore7785 Same

[@kpodbot1]

The cri cri was a French designed plane and was named after the insect the cricket cri cri is cricket in French the bede was designed in the late 60s early 70s and appeared in the bond film octopuses. This guy needs to do some research. I could pull apart every fact he has stated because they are mostly wrong he could of got all the correct facts of off the Interweb

[@Easy-Eight]

The BD5J was on Octopussy and when not appearing on the big screen the jet was used by a contractor service to fly as a simulated cruise missile for USAF jets to intercept in training mission.

[@johnnyfavorite1194]

Oh the Cri-Cri is just Cray Cray

[@jtveg]

Well since you are being so pedantic about facts, I thought I should mention that the Bond film is actually called: _"Octopussy"._

[@kpodbot]

@@jtveg wow just because I made a typo. Well thanks for pointing it out.

[@jtveg]

@@kpodbot Actually, I thought it was probably a case of autocorrect rather than a typo.. Anyway, all good. 👌🏻

[@admin-extrotvchanel2719]

Amazing ...like it more ..

[@markstevens1729]

That thumbnail is “beyond facts” or your pilot is an amputee at the rib cage. And who has the stomach for that?

[@rimckd825]

great pun

[@T_Burd_75]

I would probably have a hard time walking after a ride in that plane.

[@markstevens1729]

@@crunchybro123 in this case, dear editor, you lose a day's pay. The idiom "to stomach" refers to an ability to experience something gory and maintain one's composure, whereas "guts" is normally applied to one's ability to be brave and push forward in the face of fear. Thus "stomach" is correct usage here when referring to an amputation (gory) and the location of this amputation on the body AND the inability to maintain one's composure during that amputation. Your "edit" would utterly change the meaning of the quip, making it confusing. Please feel free to "slap" yourself.

[@MrMicklethal]

Okay folks, we need to applaud _Beyond Facts_ for creating what is possibly *the best example of Click-Bait ever made!!* Please don't be P.O. at the uploader, instead we should be celebrating their *GENIUS!*

[@351clevelandmodifiedmotor4]

1;10 are you ready for this ? Wow it went 185 mph. That is the most amazing thing ever, I can't contain myself I suppose I wasn't ready for that bomb shell

[@mikestand714]

DOUBLE SMASH LIKE...AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@BeyondFacts]

DOUBLE THANKS FOR SHAMSHING THE LIKE BUTTON 🙂 Hope you have a great day

[@SmokeFlame1]

The Corvair B-36. 2 mistakes here. It's Convair and was a post WW2 aircraft.

[@Easy-Eight]

The Goblin failed for lots of reasons. 1. after launch it could not link again on the trapeze. The test flight ended with a belly landing. 2. Air-to-Air refueling made the parasite fighter obsolete. The pokey Goblin would not have stood a chance against a MiG-15 or MiG-17

[@simonsmith3060]

Yeah, Corvair. If a guy is going to instruct us, the words and facts need to be right. Suspension of disbelief is not OK when watching a documentary.

[@wtf235235]

Great video. Would have been nice to have all speeds in same units though

[@jonnytentpeg]

That's a mother ship and a drone right there peeps 👍

[@jesuschristislord77733]

I like how the man in the thumbnail is so devoted to his craft, he did body modification.

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi Diksaca Yehovah, thanks for your comment. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

[@tylerbonser7686]

The BD-5J definitely had inspiration from the Me-163. Also "corvair" b36? And it didn't fly during WWII.

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi tyler bonser, thanks for your comment. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

[@scottiethegreat74]

I was about to question that "fact" myself!!

[@michaelvangundy226]

Way too many incorrect "facts". Didn't even watch half.

[@scottiethegreat74]

@@michaelvangundy226 Too many of these videos have way too little research for my liking!! If you are going to include "facts", at least make sure they are accurate!! 😂😂

[@tylerbonser7686]

Did anyone else catch the "tri-cycle landing gear"

[@lancerevell5979]

That little H4 helicopter would be great for a quick grocery run to my local Publix Store! 😎

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi Lance Revell, thanks for your comment. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

[@laszlozoltan5021]

that bumble-bee plane sure looks like it would work as a personal commuter. put runways on top of larger buildings - could be wild

[@nepriandries]

Nice

[@arsaeterna4285]

these planes are sooo pretty I wonder if they are harder to fly, less stable or something

[@reksmeyok1957]

I did smushed those buttons, dude.

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi Reksmey Ok, thanks for smushing the like button. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

[@reksmeyok1957]

@@BeyondFacts Thank you for you fascinating and detailed video. 😂

[@smithjones3548]

The aircraft at 5:25 is not a "Corvair B-36," but a Boeing B-17. The B-36 was built by Consolidated/Vultee corporation, later known as Convair, and was a nuclear bomber fitted with 6 piston engines in a pusher configuration and 4 jet engines.

[@daveogarf]

"Six turning and four burning".

[@SciFiSi]

That has to be the WORST thumbnail going.

[@PaulBarich1918]

That plane In the thumbnail is physically impossible unless that man has no legs

[@jamescrud]

It's obviously a joke.

[@PaulBarich1918]

@@jamescrud how is a thumbnail a joke????? The video is being serious

[@jamescrud]

@@PaulBarich1918 The thumbnail is the joke not the video. They photoshoped it to get views.

[@PaulBarich1918]

@@crunchybro123 what? Who

[@stevebutters306]

I love all the comments calling the thumbnail clickbait. You people really thought they cut someone’s legs off to fit him in that plane? Lmao

[@jimdeboer84]

The Cri-Cri’s piston engines were replaced with turbine engines, not electric. You can see them in the video.

[@WordingtonComment]

amazing thumbnail

[@jdjeep98]

About half of your BD-5J pictures were BD-5 prop models which came first but weren't BD-5Js.

[@christiangreen1477]

this

[@jacobpottala]

As soon as I heard "smash that like button" I paused, left this comment and left. People looking for these types of videos arent into that.

[@mellonhead9568]

Dreaming of flying these planes to that danger zone song

[@cantedsxghtgaming3393]

No one: Guy in thumbnail: I have no lower body.

[@9HighFlyer9]

Yeah, the BD-5J is way older than the early 2000s. More like the late 70s early 80s.

[@jimgriggs2184]

Bede 5 first flew in 1971.

[@9HighFlyer9]

@@jimgriggs2184 The pusher prop version flew in 1971. The J model is harder to pin down. Pima Air and Space Museum says 1973. It was definitely flying by the time "Octopussy" was filmed probably in 1982.

[@jimgriggs2184]

@@9HighFlyer9 yeah, I wasn't really differentiating between the pusher and the jet. They are effectively the same airframe. The bede 5 was flying way earlier than they said. However, their argument would be where they said it was available as a kit. And that may be true, I really don't know when kits became available, fairly recently I would think. Until then they were plans built. But either way, to dismiss all of those plans built pushers is being disingenuous, they've been flying for a half century, long before the 90s they mentioned.

[@corneliuscrewe677]

I think they said early 2000’s was when they started making them in kit form. No idea if that’s accurate.

[@jimgriggs2184]

@@corneliuscrewe677 I dont know that bede ever offered a kit, but I'm sure Aircraft Spruce or Wicks probably has one. I'm sure that's what they're talking about, a third party kit.

[@brycecampbell4845]

The CMC leopard is awesome! Let's hear the details on that plane!

[@Gamble661]

One of the major issues with aircraft that are that light is that if there's any appreciable wind then good luck controlling it never mind getting it back on the ground. I speak from personal experience because once I was dumb enough to fly one of these deathtraps (prop driven, not a jet). I'm a commercial pilot btw so I know how to fly. I took off in calm conditions but about 40 minutes later when I returned and tried to land (small airport, 1,700 foot runway) there was a nasty crosswind gusting across the field, nothing that would have meant a thing in any real airplane; a Piper or Cessna single engine for instance. But I couldn't get the thing on the ground, it was getting blown all over the place, it was like trying to fly a butterfly. Finally, after I can't recall how many attempts I was almost out of fuel (I knew this because the fuel tank was a plastic container behind my seat) I just came in and planted the thing in the grass next to the runway. It was no longer flyable after that but I didn't give a shit by that point because other than some bruises I was still alive...never ever again.

[@ukaszbiaas4093]

"small airport, 7000 foot runway" heh, yea, sounds like a guy that knows what he is talking about... 🤣

[@Gamble661]

@@ukaszbiaas4093 You are absolutely right, I meant to say 1,700 and mistyped. The airport btw. is called Cranland Field in Hanson MA, US. That being said; 9800 hrs of pic time logged so piss off skippy.

[@stevengrutzmacher]

These are actual aircraft. The mini-BD5J has been around for 45 years. I've seen it fly supersonic. Cool!!!!

[@michaelmorrison4201]

I will not be "smashing that like button."

[@voxelamateur]

yeah, I unpressed the "like" button after he asked to smash it the second time; it's annoying and off-putting.

[@larou14]

Wouahhhh... Super cool ! J'en veux un, hihihihi !!!! 😯😎

[@waynecampbell9714]

The thumbnail isn't actually photoshopped at all they just found a guy with half a body and put him in it LOL

[@Noidea24-z5l]

He would be dead so yea no

[@waynecampbell9714]

LMFAO

[@waynecampbell9714]

PEOPLE LIVE WITH HALF A BODY ALL THE TIME. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT BEFORE MAKING AN ASS OF YOURSELF. ALSO IT WAS A JOKE U MUST BE SLOW TO NOT REALIZE THAT RIGHT AWAY!!!

[@waynecampbell9714]

​@@Noidea24-z5l YOU R SO WRONG, GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT. LOOK IT UP. AND LEARN TO RECOGNIZE A JOKE WHEN YOU READ ONE!!!

[@heroknaderi]

ow thats incredible. and for the fighter jet it can fly from dallas to los angeses nonstop

[@MotoSnax]

I've seen that Bumble Bee at the Pima Air & Space Museum in Tucson, AZ. Pretty neat airplane. Little claustrophobic too. :)

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi MotoSnax, thanks for your comment. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

[@janetyeoman1544]

I saw it there too. Incredibly small. That museum is well worth the trip. I came from Ontario. 🇨🇦

[@Medellin1823]

"Get this, are you ready for this?"

[@mmpiforall5913]

The BD-5 / BD-5J where great flyers, but had a deadly pitch-up to a stall as soon as the engine quit, the pilot must push the stick forwards to nose over right away even at high altitudes. Why? the engine trust line was way above the centerline of the airframe. During powered flight, built in nose up bias compensates the hi trust line of the engine. The prop version with an engine failure was worst for an immediate nose-up stall since the stationary prop also caused drag. If a pilot was not fully versed on this issue the results often was fatal. Would I still fly one? Yeah.

[@joewoodchuck3824]

t-H-r-u-s-t

[@VLADPowder]

That thumbnail had me cracking up

[@TheMrBrianh]

Your channel name is appropriate. @7:38 you claim, "Sadly there's only been one model built in the entire world." How do you explain one example being on display in Dorset, England and another in Warwickshire, England simultaneously? Quantum entanglement?

[@AAFREAK]

Those are strictly the prototypes, and there are differences between the two. In this video apparently, they're referring to the second prototype which was the only model in existence apart from the first one. The second one was made because the first prototype had a fallout from an engine manufacturer, and then production couldn't begin after that because then the company chair and its designer had died.

[@TheMrBrianh]

@Christopher Albert I do what I can.

[@ratdad48]

Thank God that second plane is going to be ecco friendly! Whoo! Thank you thank you!!!

[@dr.lexwinter8604]

There is no such thing as 'zero emissions'. You're just moving the pollution from your engines to a power plant somewhere. And in the process losing significant range as fuel is far lighter with far more energy in it than any battery. So this is something to avoid if you're looking to build a kit plane.

[@rachelskans3093]

maker of the screen title: ok we are making you go in the aircraft. guy: i cant fit in ther...AGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WHY DID YOU CUT OF MY LEGS. maker:we said we need you to fit in there.

[@XB10001]

You should keep your units consistent. You are all over the place mixing MPH, knots and altitude in meters. Use metric, or imperial, but be consistent.

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi XB10001, thanks for your feedback. I'll do my best to stick to the same metrics on future videos. Hope you still enjoyed the video 🙂

[@XB10001]

@@BeyondFacts yes, very much. It was a great compilation.

[@clutchcargo2419]

@@BeyondFacts great job - your metrics were fine . some people just gotta complain. Enjoyed this vid - thx.

[@incredifall]

The scooter of the skies!!

[@ViraL_FootprinT.ex.e]

There's RC planes that look larger that some of these.

[@125AXer]

That Leopard though.... Wow.

[@raizalmohammad8188]

The Powered Paraglider or The Paramotor is the lightest backpack aircraft that could reach an altitude of 15 thousand feet and range of up to 100 miles or more..should be on the list here.

[@coxkoala591]

15000 usd..

[@hermantelbo6283]

wauw...amazing!

[@cha1rtech]

I rarely leave negative reviews but the editing of the first featured plane was awful, the extreme closeups and panning aren't hiding the fact the plane is parked in a museum and the camera tricks didn't convey a sense of motion as apparently was hoped for. Aside from that a decent video except for the multiple like and subscribe requests

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi cha1rtech, thanks for your honest feedback. I apologize if the video quality was not at the level you are used to. We did not try to hide the fact that the Stits is parked in a museum, but I will check if we can change the editing style to improve our quality. Regarding the two times, we request you to like and subscribe. Unfortunately, KZbin has become so competitive that you have to include those in the videos if you want to grow as a small creator. I try my best to make it in the most polite and fun way possible. Again if you didn't like it, I'm very sorry. But I want to thank you for taking the time and explaining what you didn't like about the video because only with feedback like yours can I improve over time and become better.

[@orbitalair2103]

yet you said nothing about the BD-5. half the shots are the prop version and the other half the jet one. After many builders cried in frustration at the propped version and all the engine overheating troubles, one smart guy simply put a jet in it. Good luck getting plans or a kit.

[@oldmech619]

@@orbitalair2103 The BD5 was very dangerous. The Aviation Safety Institute database shows a total of 25 fatal BD-5 crashes. That is a lot.

[@Uberragen21]

cha1rtech - You sound like the kind of guy who will complain about the color of your chocolate cake. Like nothing is good enough for you... yeah, that special kind of person we all know and hate. Might I suggest you _try_ to enjoy the fruits of someone else's labor. Or STFU and grow up. 🙄

[@AA-tz2bm]

@@Uberragen21 it’s funny tho, he is worried about that but didn’t notice the B-roll footage used for the BD-5J

[@Tigaputraofficial3]

Wow..kreeen👍👍👏

[@benparker5512]

Probably in poor taste to crack jokes at the death of a pilot.

[@joewoodchuck3824]

Depending on his or her party affiliation. :-)

[@thenegus5469]

@@joewoodchuck3824 yikes

[@DivergentDroid]

So you don't think I should name my altralight airport John Denver Airport? At least he's Home Again..

[@nemasis3134]

That CMC LEPPARD LOOKS SO COOL 😎

[@dude157]

I'm apprehensive about changing a wheel on my car. There's no way I'm getting on an aircraft that I assembled myself.

[@charlieirvin5423]

Sam Its the risk you take I would get on it I'm a Risk taker . If I'm going to die I rather Be on a Plane Crash

[@joewoodchuck3824]

Everyone has their own limits and fears. Further, if you're not comfortable with mechanical things, maybe such projects should be avoided in the first place. JMHO, YMMV, FWIW, etc.

[@BeyondFacts]

Hi Sam, thanks for your comment. Hope you enjoyed the video 🙂

[@mrchmusic6237]

I guess Stuart little can fly this too !! :)