Trial during the Absence of Accused- Section 205 & 317 Cr.P.C. Compared- Justice V Ramkumar

[@daysaentertainment4934]

Always a pleasure to hear sir

[@jananijanani5532]

Who are ALL watching in 2025, ohh, No words to appreciate, what an immence Knowledge in Criminal law , Honle Justice Ramkumar ,as Mr.Vikas was saying, not to deep dive ,becoz this is Mr.Ramkumar, intensively & extensively , expansively without expenses by sharing his knowledge free of charge for the legal fertinity , inside the country & abroad,what a cohesive statements. I am from Dubai & no where related to law , but I am repeatly watching Mr Justice Ram Kumar's presentation, any related case , within no time, he refers the citations, wow , very sharp, need such people for our judiciary committee. Long live sir , god bless you. Thank you Mr. Vikas for getting posted such nice opener videos, keep doing your good job

[@BeyondLawCLC]

Keep watching

[@bhagatsingh5047]

Very useful and informative presentation . Thanks a lot for imparting knowledge at own time.

[@BeyondLawCLC]

The team is happy that you have liked it.

[@advocatemnsakkeerhussain92]

Thank you sir🙏🏻

[@jitendersinghjaat777]

Thnx you very much sir

[@premlatauppal7808]

Nice sharing 👍

[@anujkkkkk]

Sir thanks for sharing your experience

[@narasimharao3311]

Excellent sir

[@commonerIndian]

thanks

[@surajitsingh1049]

To much benefited video

[@mintusaren895]

Primary evidence as unlawful you heard ,trial ,than punishment

[@sarfrazpathan1632]

Sir Crpc 205 section is applicable is warrent cases also ? If section 205 is not applicable for warrant cases then please suggest case law for the same .....please Guide 🙏.....Thank you

[@prakashprakash-mq8wz]

Nice

[@jananijanani5532]

2:40

[@PrinceChaudhuri]

Can 205 be used on the first appearance

[@rajeshranga4873]

Respect Sir, can hostile witness be examined in absence of accused and without being shown to him to the witness. Whether identification of accused be mandatory from hostile witness. Any ruling plz

[@ramkumarv7327]

Whether it is a supporting witness or hostile witness, if he is to depose before Court at a time when the accused remains absent in the dock, the assumption is that the witness knows the accused. But, if the witness says in Court that he cannot depose without knowing who the accused is, then certainly the Court is entitled to exercise its powers under Section 317 (2) Cr.P.C. and enforce the physical attendance of the accused before Court so as to facilitate the witness to see and identify the accused. This is not confined to a hostile witness alone but is applicable to any other witness.

[@rajeshranga4873]

@@ramkumarv7327 thank u so much sir.

[@mintusaren895]

Primary evidence as unlawful you heard ,trial ,than punishment

[@jananijanani5532]

4:30