"Big Bang Is Over! James Webb Telescope Detects a Structure that Should Not Exist."

[@davidgapp1457]

The fun part is that, as a scientist, finding out you were wrong is one of the most exciting and joyous moments of our lives. We didn't launch James Webb to prove everything we already thought we knew! We launched it to uncover everything we don't know.

[@reychavez-vu5ww]

Yea amazing how you make the lies scientists have imposed on all minds seem like some quirky infant mistake. Whenever you had the opportunity to grind some discovery in the faces of the faithful you did so joyously. Guess what, the Big this and that is false... hardly any accountability since you paint your curiosity out to be so innocent and childlike. Almost as if your scientific curiosity were the new holiness and the old pagan satanic mysteries are your roots or claim of deliverance. And AI is your talking idol. Made in the image of the beast, the man apart from his Creator

[@fedge9049]

Regardless if you're wrong or right, you learned something that leads to new exploration. Sounds like a win/win.

[@sarass1234]

Unlike religious things... Thats what makes science the greatest efforts of human race❤

[@alphonsemele6493]

Yaya, tell that to the idiots that tour around the world in red sneakers bablling their idiot theories like they are wet in stone. These scientists today are a joke

[@johnnywatchman777]

their always wrong , try not making up crap and use real evidence and observation , this isn't science any more , its story time with the Godless

[@sharonmarsh3728]

You say the big bang was wrong, but you keep saying "When the big bag happened ". Make up your mind

[@menard9391able]

I love this comment 😂

[@carloscolon4295]

​@@menard9391ablethey don't know how anything started.

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

You cant sit and argue infinite before now or you never get now . Its the semantics of time that keeps running out of time to explain itself in all fields of study. Really can't help but let evolutionary mythology get in the way of explanations. This leads to increasing complexity. Anything but admit these tools are an approximation and or accept just how paradoxical it is.

[@ChessNoobX]

​@@dadsonworldwide3238trying to sound smart are we🙄

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

@@ChessNoobXThat depends on what your notion of smart means. I've just been around a long time and everyone learns by default of that fact.

[@DrSimonBignell]

Didn't say what structure in the click bait.

[@merdith6]

I don't think early Galaxy's developed faster. I think the universe is simply older than they thought it was.

[@akmurf7429]

Age won't fix bad models no matter how much time you add. And by adding time you create all kinds of other problems that fly in the face of thermodynamics.

[@techteampxla2950]

It’s not a bad comment , it’s the obvious answer and it’s great you’re thinking about these things. You have me curious now. And thank your saying “I think” that’s amazing that your humble and saying that it’s just your thought and not “proven true” or misleading jargon

[@BoraWorldNetworksBNET]

its infinate and there was no big bang.

[@peteworthy8322]

It is so old that it had no beginning, and it will have no end. Just enjoy the blink of an eye that is your brief existence.

[@jackh1032]

Please report clickbait.

[@TrueReal-de6ee]

Reported as spam/misleading. Thank you for saving my time.

[@aneternall]

All content on the internet uses clickbait. Is this one worse because it made you accidently start to watch a science video?

[@TrueReal-de6ee]

Not all content uses clickbait@@aneternall. What's your problem anyways? A pissant is a pissant. A piece of shit is a piece of shit. They didn't even say what the structure in the thumbnail is so fuck 'em. That's the only reason I came to this video in the first place. That's called being deceitful. A liar is a liar and nobody likes a liar, except others who benefit from their lies in one way or another.

[@TrueReal-de6ee]

You're not very smart, are you@@aneternall?

[@patrickrannou1278]

Downvote all videos with misleading titles.

[@stargazer7644]

4:58 Lambda Λ is the 11th Greek letter and is associated with the Latin letter L, not A. The Greek letter A is alpha.

[@heckelphon]

Is the voice-over computer generated? Has it derived from a scan of the text where the upper-case lambda looked like an A to the robot, and so it fell into the trap? There are some very strange inflections in the speech which makes it sound AI generated -- but apologies to whomever it was if that's not the case!

[@whukriede]

Yes, that's where I stopped watching.

[@tejloro]

Gave up at this point... just ignorant...

[@patricksweetman3285]

@@heckelphon and confusing Einstein with Eisenstein.

[@heckelphon]

@@patricksweetman3285 I don't know who these anonymous people are who set up accounts to trawl other posters' resources and bolt together their own rehashes of the material. There's another channel which used a strap line very similar to this one, called TheSimplySpace. The voice-over is slightly better, but you still feel that the script is being read by someone who did not write it (AI wrote it?) and he starts into each sentence very clearly having no clue what is coming next, so he fails to inflect and connect clauses properly, and pauses for effect on the wrong parts of names, for example not realising that with "Proxima Centauri" the Proxima bit is not the main name -- because he knows no Latin. These channels behave like plagiarising bots, scraping resources and restringing them together. The curse of the internet, really! Not sources of knowledge you could ever trust, I reckon.

[@markschneider1396]

According to one astronomer, if our own galaxy was the size of earths oceans, we know what's in about 1 liter. That's what's so mind-boggling.

[@sanji2158]

And when you factor in how little we actually know about our own oceans, the little we know, we know very little about.

[@drd1924]

@@sanji2158 Which brings truth to the saying...."The more we learn, the more we realize the less we know"

[@paulmurphy8549]

Thst was to creste perspective but seriously underestimated

[@TheRVSN]

Mind boggling is the fact that global predictor knows but conceals information about black hole that ran through Solar system and messed up planet orbits as well as their axes. The black hole sized approximately as the Sun is still there on the fringe of Solar system. And we observe remains of destroyed objects that periodically fall on Earth. The time frame is just a few centuries.

[@zawiszaczarnysulima3700]

I don't want to sound like another KZbin contrarian; we all know how many of them are lurking around hunting for an opportunity to inflate their own ego while adding nothing constructive to the conversation, but I think there is an opportunity to put things into a perspective here. If we know what's in one liter of the ocean water, and we understand the basic principles of how oceans operate, constantly mixing all the water they contain, we can infer with a great degree of certainty what's in all of the many remaining liters: probably H2O, similar composition of dissolved minerals, perhaps some microbes, maybe a fish or two, some human added microplastics, etc., etc., etc. As an example: while we do not know everything about our solar system, we understand quite a bit about our sun, planets, moons, comets, etc. It would be safe to assume that the billions of other stars in our galaxy share some of the elements and principles we discovered analyzing our solar system and its components. There are differences, to be sure, but there are also similarities.

[@redmed10]

The universe is not only stranger than we imagine; it is stranger than we can imagine.

[@worfoz]

Strange images are universal. It's hard to imagine that we are just strangers lost in this universe.

[@henrythegreatamerican8136]

I need a spectrometer to analyze the crusty weird white stain on my bedsheets.

[@andytopley314]

There is a theory which states that if people ever work out what the universe actually IS it will instantly be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened

[@soulbot119]

I'm still stuck on the first thing: that it's infinite. My tiny brain can't accept this, everything else has an end, so how tf can this be? I can't imagine infinity

[@redmed10]

@@soulbot119 No one can. Don't knock yourself too much about it. It's the ultimate paradox. Enjoy your life.

[@pygmalion1963]

“There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.” ― Douglas Adams

[@markcedydabest5692]

Theory is just a theory, no matter how good is that theory it still void unless it is actually reach by the human hand and could not be define by observation alone...seeing is different from touching and molding, crafting and refining...that's the difference of observation versus actualization.

[@pygmalion1963]

@@markcedydabest5692 You kind of missed the point. You should go away and read "The hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy" try to develop a sense humour then come back

[@iRossco]

Reminds me of an Arthur C Clarke story the "Nine Billion Names of God" In a Tibetan monastery the monks seek to list all of the names of God. They believe the Universe was created for this purpose, and that once this naming is completed, God will bring the Universe to an end.

[@borabingol6797]

Douglas Adams was a genius.

[@supertubemind]

In other words crackpots can make up whatever crackpot theory they want.

[@readthetype]

No scientist, intellect, or person worth listening to for that matter, has ever used the phrase _“broke the universe.”_ The only people who speak that way are contemptuous, manipulate, disrespectful salesmen. Instead of speaking like a fool, desperately trying to impress the popular older boys, try speaking like a grown-up speaking to a friend or adult, whose intelligence you respect. It breaks my heart that you need this explained to you.

[@JD_JustDoing]

It's the Universe; infinite to include even its possibilities. I can understand being surprised you find something, but not being surprised it exists. We're too confident we know rules when all we've ever had is our best hypothesis.

[@daviddavies8637]

Absolutely right JD. Academics/experts study hard and read many articles, papers and studies and go on and write their own hypothesis and this suggests they know the appropriate answers. Computer models are used to prove hypothesis but computer models display the answers the authors want - not always the absolute truth.

[@akmurf7429]

Hopothisese creates models. If your models do not make correct predictions. Your hypotheses are incorrect. That is how science works but atheists ignore that premise of science and keep their hypotheses on life support. Rescue hypotheses, one after another. Really it is all about world views.

[@roboroach69]

I think in all honesty we have only scratched the surface of what our universe actually is, where it’s from and why it exists, what governs the laws of physics we have proven that exist, There has to be a higher power or something out there.. I’m not religious in any way.. but there has to be a reason the universe even exists.. where did all the energy and mass come from? What are its secrets?. So many questions that we have no correct and proven answers for! Only theories!. Will we ever find out? Thats the mind blowing part

[@chezsnailez]

“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.”

[@ezion67]

"We are sorry for the inconvenience."

[@gaminawulfsdottir3253]

Don't panic.

[@hotdog9262]

the notion that the universe had a `beginning` doesn`t seem very logical. especially as its supposed age is just three times older then earth

[@RonTodd-gb1eo]

@@hotdog9262 Has existed for ever does not seem very logical either.

[@hotdog9262]

​@@RonTodd-gb1eo i don`t know.. probably gonna be laughed at now but i think simple intuition should have a bit more elbow room in science. black holes for example were denied for decades even though it was plain for everyone to see through telescopes galaxies move around a center like water draining down a sink. what is more likely, dark matter being some heavy stuff we can`t see ..or gravity is a force we doesn`t fully understand yet

[@dwightswanson3015]

"Big Bang is Over!" Then we hear 36 minutes about why the Big Bang is true.

[@barrywhittingham6154]

Interspersed with about forty minutes of ads.

[@GORF_EMPIRE]

Reason for why it is true given are all fantastic nonsense. The big bang was over before it started. No honest science exists to support it whatsoever.

[@worfoz]

@@barrywhittingham6154 Yes; if the Big Bang is true, then the messages converted in those adds could be true as well. In between the space talk and the science, I learned a lot about what products to use. And I learned new facts about the Greek alphabet too, and discovered new lies about Covid: the lambda variant came first. As an alpha-male, I know my place now.

[@curtcoller3632]

Well, before God was killed by debris he big banged his head

[@mzbarsk]

It’s always click bait.

[@gabriellapierre4253]

I find it funny how they just start putting Albert Einstein pictures as they talk about Daniel Einstein 😂

[@Lennythewinner]

Parallel u̶n̶i̶v̶e̶r̶s̶e̶ Einstein?🤔

[@Lennythewinner]

- or EISENstein

[@lunaballuna]

Probably because this is all clickbait with zero careful consideration into what they're actually presenting or claiming. All new scientific discoveries tend to be overhyped and overexaggerated to scarily unscientific extents (generally running with the first thought that pops into their heads regardless of expert opinions, the actual research, or lack thereof) as it gains more traction and views. Same shit with the "black holes on earth", Mayan calendar, the " bloop", the "wow signal", the face on Mars, and so on and so on. Right now it's this and the sun ending civilization next near. People LOVE syfi gossip.

[@willthomsen7569]

It’s a deep fake lol

[@BobSpath]

It's an AI thing. I guess we're lucky the picture wasn't of a black person.

[@Limp_Daddy]

We create theories that people accept as fact, while discovering we actually know very little. However, seeing new discoveries let's you know it's a wonderful time to be alive and nothing is perfect but perfect in every way.

[@Arty_McParty]

I agree with you , we know NOTHING actually... If we know only 10% of our ocean ... how do we expect to know anything in the Universe.... LOL We still descovering new animals on our own planet... The technology is way over our heads... we not that intellegent yet but we trying to work with computer that's way above our brains.

[@davidgapp1457]

Only stupid people accept theories as fact.

[@philsurtees]

@@Arty_McParty Only someone who knows absolutely nothing about the technologies they use to watch videos and leave comments on KZbin, and how we managed to build them - by understanding things like electromagnetism and quantum mechanics - would say that _" we know NOTHING actually."_ We know some of the fundamental laws of the universe you muppet. We have measured the Earth elongating in one direction as gravity waves, caused by black holes merging 2 billion years ago, passed through it. We have proven that the Higgs Field exists and explained how mass come into being. We have created elements which don't exist in nature. You're on a video which is showing images of galaxies from the early history of the universe, but you think we know nothing??? We don't know everything - no one ever said we do - but we know *AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT* actually. The ignorance of some people these days is truly stupendous...

[@Slohoffman01]

No scientific theory is ever accepted as “fact”. Science is constantly trying to disprove itself. That’s what science IS

[@ryoung1111]

And after viewing this video, we know even less! We now seem to have lost track of the Greek alphabet.

[@daviddunmore8415]

''Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it it stranger than we can imagine' - J.B.S. Haldane

[@photon_guy_99]

Universe is 155 trillion years old It got lot of times destroyed and recreated

[@thecentralscrutinizerr]

In these galaxies that were formed a few million years after the big bang, if life emerged and is still existent, it would mean they are older than life on Earth by billions of years. If intelligent life formed, it would mean they are billions of years ahead of life on Earth. Just a side note: The Universe is bigger than what you can see by telescopes. What you can see with telescopes is known as the "visible Universe". What if the visible universe from the perspective of Earth would be the size of an atom compared to the actual size of the Universe?

[@skab123]

It would be an atom only.

[@skab123]

Biological life era lasts for a few million years only. Those galaxies might have got millions of biological life eras in billions of years. That means each biological life era evolution & advancement is limited by nature, wherever it may be. This is not nature's problem. This is your vulnerability in the system of nature.

[@skab123]

For this reason, all those alien sketches are fantasies of biological mind. Your existence is the proof of biological origin, limit & fate.

[@skab123]

If life is a lock, where is the key?

[@enriquecomemierda4745]

The universe is wondrous why do some people have a need to invent a mythical character to take credit for it all.

[@nigelspencer6546]

The Greek letter A, pronounced Lambda??? Sorry, but do get your basic facts straight. It’s the Greek letter L!

[@earlmcintosh8520]

TRANSLATED, WE STILL DONT HAVE A CLUE. HOWEVER, IT PAYS WELL TO ASSUME NOW A DAYS.

[@numealinesimpetar1]

This was really fascinating. Tnx for the podcast.

[@Odysseuss.]

"Big Bang Is Over! James Webb Telescope Detects a Structure that Should Not Exist." I must have missed it.

[@chipsawdust5816]

We all missed it. Click bait picture.

[@wardropper]

There needs to be a legal penalty for time wasting.

[@MoviesByeMark]

@@wardropper Not only is there not a penalty, but the 'rules' of good distribution on this platform encourage those outlandish claims by suggesting major words and a limited number in your 'ideal' description. There is a definite collision between drama algorithms and factual presentations. (just sayin')

[@homesteadgamer1257]

I actually thought I was the only one who missed it. This is the only comment besides my own that even addresses that.

[@bobgreenwald8715]

@@chipsawdust5816 Unfortunately, click bait headlines are what lazy people (who don't read or watch the whole story) remember and repeat. in this case I have heard so many examples of people saying the big bang theory was killed by the JWST. As if the real story is not interesting enough!

[@susankay497]

Revisions... what science is all about 👍 So very exciting

[@digimont]

"Give us money so we can study this thing!" (some time later) "We now understand this thing" (some time later) "We now realise we were completely wrong, give us money to study this thing!"

[@John-wg6xw]

This video tells us nothing.

[@mrrandom55951]

Where is the picture in the thumbnail?

[@joshhooker7390]

The greater our "understanding" becomes, the more advanced technology develops, the more it reveals intelligent divine design in everything we behold. All of the universe screams of His Majesty, our Lord God Creator of all that exists. By Him all things were created and in Him all things are held together.

[@HonViddaj1]

Clickbait channels only fool me once.

[@gengamen]

How much for actual explanation

[@InertiaCreeps]

I find it odd that not only is the Great Expansion (more accurate name for “The Big Bang”) being questioned, but this video goes a step further and inserts “Dark Matter” which is also currently thought to be incorrect by many physicists/astronomers/mathematicians. I personally feel Dark Matter is sus as we have made observations, did some maths, and then made something up to explain the difference between the maths and our observations. God forbid that maybe our maths aren’t as good as they need to be to accurately describe the universe. Nope, we randomly make up some mysterious matter/energy to explain it. Much as primitive Man made up Men sitting in clouds (aka GODS) to explain lightning, volcanoes, etc.

[@harrimatt101]

I think its wonderful to think about all this and let the humans race become aware of what a special plant we were given...and just maybe will shall treat her with kindness❤

[@TRACY-hc5mu]

See the Other Bible Code by Vernon Jenkins

[@clivejenkins4033]

🤔

[@royjabiv]

the earth is not a living thing - it's a huge rock. So it doesn't give a crap how it's 'treated' - ice age, molten lava, green grass, all meaningless to a rock. Humans humanize the earth and believe that it's only 'happy' when they're happy.

[@robinac6897]

Why don't you comment in readable English?

[@ohheyemmi]

@@robinac6897 Why don't you do literally anything else with your time?

[@RickBennette]

It won't affect any of us for billions of years. So, I'm not worrying a bit.

[@whcsanders]

If the universe is infinite is size, it must be infinite in age.

[@rogerone7387]

The universe is a beautiful place, we may as human beings ever have the answer's we are looking for but at least we can continue to enjoy it's greatness of being..

[@robinac6897]

"never", "answers", "its".........why don't you concentrate on the basics like expressing yourself in competent English?

[@ohheyemmi]

@@robinac6897 First, English isn't everyone's second language. Second, the "w" in "why" should be capitalized since we are being pedantic. Sticking with pedantry, there should also be a comma between the words "basics" and "like." Also, I don't know why you have so many dots listed there as an ellipses (...) is only 3 dots and a period (.) only one. I count nine (9) listed after what isn't even a sentence fragment but rather a few random words separated by a comma. Why don't you concentrate on the basics, like expressing yourself in competent English? EDIT: What was accomplished by this bit of pedantry? Do you think it makes you look smarter when you adhere to an archaic set of rules and criticize anyone who doesn't? Pro tip - it doesn't. It does the opposite, in fact. You clearly understood what they meant, and isn't the point of language to communicate more effectively with others? So if you both knew what OP meant, what was the point in this weirdly aggressive attempt at a mic drop moment? What purpose did it serve? Do you think people are grateful when they receive comments like this? As a writer, I can say with absolute certainty that they are not. Just... stop.

[@saraheart8527]

@@robinac6897 IT'S silly for you to be pedantic. Nanny nanny, Poo poo fanny. ; = ) Tee hee.

[@randykalish7558]

To realize being goes beyond the mind, to the habitation of the creator.

[@GordieGii]

Lambda is called Lamda because it is the Greek letter L. The Greek letter A is called Alpha and the Greek letter B is called Beta. Since they are the first two letters they, and all the other letters, are called the Alpha-Bet, or alphabet.

[@Alwis-Haph-Rytte]

You need to go back farther then Greek to the Hebrew's 1st 2 letters Alef and Bet. The alphabet letters orginated with the Egyptian cursive form of hieroglyphs called hieratic with it's 22 letters. It's the mother alphabet. Greek came from Hebrew and Hebrew came from hieratic, as did Phoenician. Their shapes have changed over the centuries, but the name alphabet comes from Hebrew. That's also the source of alpha and beta. You might look into The New Chronology developed by English Egyptologist David Rohl and other researchers.

[@GordieGii]

@@Alwis-Haph-Rytte Very interesting. Thanks. I love this kind of stuff. (one of my favorites is the history of the ampersand) My point was the narrator was wrong when he said that Lambda was the Greek letter A, but please let me know if I'm the one who is wrong.

[@bricecook1680]

You were right and wrong at the same time but the video was totally wrong

[@GordieGii]

I wasn't technically wrong. I didn't say that alpha and beta were the first two letter ever. Just the first two letters of the Greek alphabet. The word we use in English is alphabet, not alefbet. I have no reason to doubt that alpha and beta came from alef and bet, but the word alphabet clearly comes from the Greek.

[@Alwis-Haph-Rytte]

@@GordieGii The Greeks got the names of those 2 letters from Hebrew, but accents cause phonetic changes in translations. Case in point Hebrew to Greek and Latan then English, the name Yeshua turned into Jesus. English inherited the 'J' sound in the 17th century. Before that it was Iesus. And I still stumble over English the only language I speak, almost as bad as google's AI spells and auto-corrects, LOL

[@D.von.N]

What I always struggle with is the imagination of the distance and time (as inllustrated in that doppler effect scheme). We can tell how long the light from the object travelled to us by the red shift, but how confident we can be in deciphering WHEN it started travel to us and from what distance in the past, when the space keeps expanding and at an increasing speed? This is what my brain struggles computing. Something like you cannot tell the position and speed of the electron at the same time.

[@D.von.N]

plus, as I am watching further, my scientific brain (not from cosmology) finds flaws, as they pointed out, in assuming that the brightness of a galaxy should be used as a guide for its mass (or even distance as I saw it elsewhere for stars). We cannot know how old each particular galaxy is, whether it relatively recently absorbed matter from other galaxy that was incorporated into it, the old one having a lot of remnant black holes from old collapsed massive stars scattered in its arms in darkness plus new bright material from a newer galaxy... I can see they make a lot of assumptions and use them as solid points for further assumptions. Even the lensing effect might not always be fool proof.

[@D.von.N]

Another question: why are they so puzzled by large bright galaxies in very early universe? Why do they insist on this particular age of universe? It could be much older (and larger) than we think.

[@chingompiew1]

@@D.von.N I was thinking the same thing.

[@bricecook1680]

It's all based on lying to themselves nothing more. Light does not travel at a constant speed The colors of light are not constant either.. Wave lengths vary but according to their assumptions it's constant... logic dictates that most if not all of their assumptions are based on the wag method of science Wag = wild ass guess You must understand that they are according to their own explanations "tweaking" their models and simulations to get the result they expected.... In other words lying to themselves by changing the algorithms to fit their pre conceived bias First off with nothing in existence nothing could condense to become the big bang.... God created everything quite simple really and most science is being used "tweaked" and bent to try to destroy God It's not going to happen Just as carbon dating is a huge fraud ... that was obvious to me when I was in the 4th grade..... Just as fossil fuels are not fossils.... Just as most science is driven by funding which is only funded if the scientist finds what the funders want found.... anyone that goes against the paradigm is destroyed and discredited never to work or be funded again.... Everything is not what you have been told.... plenty of technology has been locked away and hidden

[@truecrony]

@@D.von.N The Universe could be procedurally generated instead of a singularity. The Universe could be so expansive that parts of it are in the early stages of expansion but well outside the Visible Universe. Or perhaps the singularity is moving through other dimensions making a constant stream of new Universe/new expansion/new space truly never-ending. I hope we're not wrong about the singularity and every point expanding at the same time.

[@AaronBernstein-pw2me]

If we could live a trillion years and could travel a million times the speed of light, we still couldn't reach the explanation for us.

[@rickydaum3818]

Most of us out here in “we aren’t sure land” never considered the Big Bang settled science

[@MalikAlhuzaid-ci2yt]

James Webb space telescope it's incredible which can detect the some different nature from universe and make scientists and other people to open new understanding about a various exploration

[@m.g.540]

Discovering that the predictions where wrong is why science progresses and moves forward, being wrong is a great oppurtunity for learning more, only a Luddite would believe it is a hindrance and a roadblock.

[@randykalish7558]

I agree. Pretending to be right would seem to be the roadblock detectable in so many facets of human existence.

[@ahdziz666]

You'd think that if "evil scientists" were trying to pull the wool over everybody's eyes, they would just decline to publish results that cast doubt on the best current interpretations of the universe.

[@doctaber2213]

Unless you are the Smithsonian you simply hide the evidence so you can remain right.

[@jiunc.1604]

I did not had time to watch the video, so i have a question: Did they really talk about a "Structure that Should Not Exist" deteected by the Telescope? It was even mentioned in the video? or just in the title...

[@trishfevens9297]

They have a habit of using false titles. Very disappointing and misleading.

[@alexisgs8800]

Clickbait that spreads misinformation about science should be prohibited. It's completely irresponsible. These videos are made to educate people, but those who really want to educate themselves are already inclined to watch long videos on subjects that interest them and are unlikely to spread falsehoods based on a misleading title. The real danger comes from those who get their information from the titles without watching the videos. This happens very often, and when people are not careful about how they name their content, it contributes to the spread of lies across the internet and among the general population.

[@alexisgs8800]

In fact, this makes me so mad that every time I see a title like this one, which I immediately recognize as being false, I don't even watch the video. I didn't watch this one, and I'm not going to.

[@anthonycraig274]

“We really weren’t expecting this” isn’t called freaking out.

[@akmurf7429]

It's called our hypotheses are incorrect.

[@Lcab-bh3wx]

For every action there's a Reaction= Nothing comes from nothing.

[@twveach]

Wrong, but it’s ok because; The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you.

[@xx3868]

No, thats your pastor and creationist speaking ignorance!!. NO, The "nothing empty space void is alive with virtual particles and the theory is just maybe..... just.... that this "nothing is needed to make the something. controversial but it has certain lines of evidence in that sort of direction. Problem most of the universe is DM and DE and we have no clue what it is BUT its there and measurable and its not GOD!! hmm or 1200 diff ones?? We evolved and almost dies a few times on the way to today and million of diff species died off before us and we ended up hairless, pale skinned and full of cancers that other animals dont get?? also nerves that loop around long distances so designed? yeah by a half witted Dem maybe!! or flat earther! The BB and background radiation proves the event of something close to it happened 13.7 billion years age and nothing can change that. The strange unpredicted galaxies that we shouldnt find ARE there back in time and now we have to work ut how that works and put this mess together BUT its there and its real and space time formed 13.7 B back. So the next 12 mega telescopes over the next 100 years or so will dig deeper and find even more stuff to confuse BUT its fact and there and arguing ignorance or God must have done it only shows humans gullibility and imagination and guessing as they did in bible times. Creator of life and the universe likes slavery?? we dont even like that today but back then they DID, so god was written to like it too and proves its nonsense just as we thing martians are green and carry ray guns like the 50's movies!! What happened out there is reality and we either forget about it and worship our imaginary gods and kill others in their names, or become rational and work it out and stop the insanity!!

[@rudivanrooijen7611]

Actually, if you add up all actions and reactions you end up with nothing. So, it may be possible that variations in nothingness lead to local 'somethings'.

[@saraheart8527]

@@twveach Yes, extremely wrong, and I like your use of NDGT's words, but they should be in quotes, so it's not plagiarism.

[@Choom2077]

@@saraheart8527 In the end... we all end up in the same hall where no one knows a damn thing about anything.

[@curtcoller3632]

LAMDA is not the letter A it is L. It's so sad that even American professional speakers (narrators, actors) are ignoring this.

[@1billthekid]

Amen! A is Alpha..

[@battles146]

LaMDA is a family of conversational large language models developed by Google. Originally developed and introduced as Meena in 2020, the first-generation LaMDA was announced during the 2021 Google I/O keynote, while the second generation was announced the following year.

[@kitmoore9969]

... and it's spelled lambda.

[@saraheart8527]

@@kitmoore9969 " It's so sad that even American professional speakers (narrators, actors) are ignoring this." I find it sad that for all your protesting, you don't know it's spelled Lambda. Bow your head in shame.

[@kitmoore9969]

@@saraheart8527Do you mean @curtcollar3632?

[@nomoreturningaway1459]

Spacetime is the strangest thing in the universe.

[@cheebawobanu]

"spacetime" is a bullshit phrase made up to cover what they DO NOT KNOW

[@paulm749]

Spacetime encompasses every thing in the universe.

[@jeffreyryan7671]

It makes sense to me. I may have thought like you before being taught how it works. But now it makes sense. Kinda like before we understood (some of) the atomic universe. Or all the life that thrives in a drop of water. Very strange long ago, But now we stand on the shoulders of giants.

[@auriuman78]

Technically, consciousness is the strangest (and most astonishing) thing in the universe, IMHO. But I get your point 😉

[@robinac6897]

Nope consciousness is. Everything would work just as well without it and yet it still exists.

[@johnaweiss]

"Shouldn't exist" doesn't mean it's "magic" or "god". "Shouldn't exist" means it contradicts our current model, so we have to fix our model.

[@MrMick560]

I wish other video makers would take note of this commentary, so pleasant calm and peaceful instead of the superfast incoherent garbled nonsense I usually hear. I have heard some people think its A.I. generated, it may well be but still a great improvement.

[@kirkstickney7394]

So, it could even be said, “we don’t know what we don’t know” and probably even “we don’t really know what we thought we knew”, so… we just don’t know… 🤨🤨🤨

[@saraheart8527]

Not quite true, we keep learning more about the universe every day.

[@kirkstickney7394]

Yes, we are learning that we don’t really know…👀

[@saraheart8527]

@@kirkstickney7394 The only thing learned here, is THIS VIDEO is crap, that is to be ignored. Science goes on updating and adding to our knowledge on a continuous basis. Trust the scientific method, which is always self correcting. KZbin video's like this one come from people looking to make a buck with clickbait. I'll choose science everyday over uknown Master-Baiters.

[@randykalish7558]

If we knew that we don't know what we know there would be room for realization. Then our minds wouldn't serve as cultural landfill.

[@muhammadmushtaq6928]

I love to watch scientific research though they are beyond my knowledge. Than it's not necessarily for everyone to understand everything. 😊😊😊

[@saraheart8527]

Absolutely right.

[@marinoceccotti9155]

The JWST is as important as Hubble has been in its time. From the time it has been launched by an Ariane 5 (Cocoricooo!) I knew it will be BIG. It did not disappoint. More to come. More more more !

[@zinawilkins2364]

😂

[@zinawilkins2364]

❤

[@zinawilkins2364]

Lord god I thank you

[@zinawilkins2364]

God you are so amazing you're worthless so wonderful

[@zinawilkins2364]

I love you guys, and you blow my mind more. You're showing us about your works in your power. And your love is just blowing me wake up

[@mollysurey6058]

poor production. the rousing music is unnecessary and simply annoying and distracting.

[@YALDABOATHJr]

They wasted 100000000000000$ pretending to launch this telescope intospace. So they manufactor results to make it seem like its doing its job. Wtf.

[@Dimitar_Stoyanov_359]

[4:58] "The greek letter A pronounced Lambda" 😂😂😂 And this is a science video. 🤦

[@LaserGuidedLoogie]

Lamda is pronounced "lamda," not "Ayyy." It's a Greek letter, not an English analog.

[@nickolasbrown3342]

this is likely one of those bogus AI-generated clickbait titles, if you pay close attention it makes other weird mistakes, and doesn't talk like an actual human.

[@vinceturner3863]

@@nickolasbrown3342 are you sure it's not lambda-iota-generated?

[@LaserGuidedLoogie]

@@nickolasbrown3342 You are probably right.

[@wlan246]

Whoever wrote this script just lost a lot of credibility by not understanding that Lambda is analogous to the Latin letter L, not A.

[@wandamaddox7824]

But - it's kind of shaped like an A

[@chipsawdust5816]

I'm certainly not an astrophysicist, but I never really bought into the big bang. How it was formed is unanswered. What was there before it? No, it leaves more questions than it answers for me. If we were in one of those other galaxies that are "racing away from us" would we be standing still? It's an Earth- or Sol-centric point of view we have, like flat Earthers hundreds of years ago.

[@rodmack302]

Take a look at theory Z0 for another idea that explains things in a new light. Since no links are allowed here search it.

[@zeuso.1947]

Well, based on your comment, you can take comfort in not knowing anything about the actual Big Bang theory.

[@johnnicol8598]

Yes it's obvious nonsense. Meant to align religion with physics. Does a poor job. Webb is making this farce no longer sustainable. Watch for even more fanciful explanations now.

[@chipsawdust5816]

@@zeuso.1947 Based on your comment, you think you have a really big brain but can't find a way to comment without being condescending.

[@chipsawdust5816]

@@rodmack302 Thanks I will :)

[@MR2Davjohn]

The "Big Bang" was supposed to be an explosion of unknown matter resulting in the universe. Let's look at a few facts of an explosion: An explosion is multi-directional unless it is a shaped charge. All those pictures that show a horn-shaped universe are wrong. Matter from the explosion went in every direction. Particles flying away from the site of the explosion slow down as their energy dissipates. Even in a vacuum they will slow given enough time. Particles do not organize. Particles from an explosion scatter randomly. If particles knock together in their flight, they will break and/or change direction. Unless it is a burning out explosive matter, the explosion cannot create light. Matter is matter. There is no dark matter. "Dark Matter", white holes, black holes, galaxies, red shift, nebulae, and the myth of a telescope seeing back to the beginning of the universe just after the big bang all tend to prove any origin of the universe impossible.

[@arcticantic1768]

good work. I encourage you to continue science news reporting.

[@joeanderson8839]

Is there any documented case of a galaxy moving out of our field of vision? If the universe is really expanding like scientists believe, then some of these galaxies should be fading over time.

[@surronzak8154]

There is

[@johnbennett6665]

The big bang was totally silent as there was no atmosphere to transmit sound.

[@simeonbetteridge5223]

Everything is sound.

[@hughforbes4201]

@@simeonbetteridge5223 Everything is vibration

[@martinwilliams9866]

There was a Quark soup, through which oscillations could travel.

[@StanErvin-yo9vl]

Would seriously love a bowl of chilled quark. Delicious with Romaine lettuce, tomato, shaved truffle. Served with an early Port, preferably less than fifty years.

[@Elurin]

@@StanErvin-yo9vl Quark, as in the sub-sub atomic particle? or Quark, the crazy Ferengi bartender from DS9? Just wondering because one is edible, and the other is not.

[@brunonikodemski2420]

The Spitzer telescope could actually see much further back in time, due to its longer wavelength capability. However it only had a small collection area, so the sensitivity was low. What we actually need is a Spitzer of similar (or larger) size than JWST.

[@thesleepstate]

Maybe if they'd got some specialists in they could do better.

[@Thurgosh_OG]

They are already working on the Carl Sagan Telescope; an considerably larger version of the JWT.

[@saraheart8527]

@@thesleepstate Ha!

[@saraheart8527]

How about as many types as we can get? The more info the better.

[@khunmikeon858]

@@thesleepstate😂😂

[@timothykarnes7945]

Curious as to what is the universe expanding into ..⏳

[@iRossco]

Makes its own space-time. Irrespective, we'll probably never know for sure.🤷‍♂️

[@deerhunterthom5458]

At 2:37, the narration expresses the typically assumed "fact" that is infuriating: "the infinite universe began cooling off." An infinite universe with infinite heat and infinite density cannot "cool off." There's nothing to radiate any of the energy to. Every particle (if measured) would be found to be at an infinite number of joules. "Cooling" requires that there be an adjacent particle with a non-infinite amount of energy which can absorb some of the infinite energy to enable the system to move toward equilibrium at a lower energy level. In a similar way, the theoreticians like to claim that the universe "expanded" from an infinitely dense state to a less than infinitely dense state. The less knowledgeable always ask, "what did the universe expand into?" And the "smart guys in the room" insist that "there's nothing that is being expanded into, the universe is already infinite and there's nothing outside of it." Psychobabble bulls**t.

[@toddkurzbard]

Here's the way I have always seen it: The true nature of the Universe is far beyond the capability of the human race to ever comprehend.

[@loganmiller4919]

Home boy… we’ve literally made time crystals with AI 😑 That belief is so “octogenarian black and white foggy void heaven” coded that I almost can’t believe that some people still think that…. The true vastness of extent of the Universe can never be fully comprehended by humans, this is a true fact, we don’t even perceive the world as it actually is, what we see is basically a controlled hallucination, everything that’s happening is actually happening, but the only reason we see and interpret the world around us as we do is because our brain is wired to perceive it this way. Some people are colorblind, some aren’t. Some people have Misophonia, which causes them to become upset because of a specific sound. Some people have Demon Face Syndrome which can cause a person to see other people with distorted faces that appear demon like. This goes all the way down to the cons and rods in our eyes… my cons might be more or less sensitive to certain light than yours. But these are merely limitations put upon us by nature, our intelligence allows us to surpass those limits. Think about it, when Sir William Herschel put a thermometer in light and then just on the outside of the red and purple rays of light, he discovered infrared… do you think if anyone said “hey, you ever think that there’s some level of light we just can’t see, you think the light is actually the same thing that causes heat.” Prior to this discovery literally ANYONE would take them seriously??? You think that the ancient Greeks and Romans would be able to truly understand and fathom that, cause I don’t think they would. We do, obviously we do… but we’ve also been taught this since a young age… light is just radiation, there’s certain levels we can’t see because the wavelength is to small or the frequency is too high. Einstein did the math and figured out that black holes could exist, then he dismissed it 2 decades later essentially saying “it can exist in math, but not in reality”. EVEN EINSTEIN COULDN’T FATHOM A INFINITELY DENSE MASS 😭😭😭 But to me, that’s just a normal thing… obviously that can happen, I can fathom that. Something so small yet so heavy that it literally bends space-time onto itself, yea, that’s normal…. Literally MILLIONS of these infinitely dense masses exist, because literally millions of galaxies exist. It wasn’t until literally 2000 years ago, like damn near on the dot, in 1924 Edwin Hubble discovered that Andromeda was a Galaxy and not a Nebula… before 1924, no one could even fathom that there was other Galaxies similar to our own galaxy in terms of size and content. Everything I mentioned here, is using some level of an advent of technology, a telescope, Computers, or even something as simple as a thermometer. Humans can definitely understand and fathom the universe, it just takes the advent of a specific technology in order to do so, we can’t naturally see infrared, but we can with tech. Humans aren’t designed to understand the universe, we were designed to escape and survive against the predators that were trying to eat us. But we can create things that allow us to comprehend it. With tech and time, eventually the things that seem completely absurd and impossible to you, will seem absolutely normal and understandable to the generations that follow.

[@vrado441]

so "big bang" is BS?

[@daverson8609]

Gaps in our capabilities constantly dwindle.

[@Scottocaster6668]

I still can't comprehend how we can see the beginning of time 13 billion years ago, due to the fact that the light takes so long to get to us. Scrambled mind.

[@davexenos9196]

Is it possible that the Big Bang occurred within an existing universe? explains the big galaxy.

[@clivejenkins4033]

Yeah, maybe from a black hole

[@clivejenkins4033]

Or perhaps we in a black hole😳

[@eugenefranik9557]

If you read up on string theory and the concept of a multiverse you can understand the concept of how our universe could have come to existance.

[@nigelmansfield3011]

@@eugenefranik9557 I wouldn't use string theory. That theory is close to being debunked. Great mathematically but not a shred of evidence to support it.

[@paulscowcroft7926]

It's much more likely that it never happened at all.

[@alcoury7547]

So where is the "Structure that Should Not Exist?". I hate it when they use bait and switch. Thumbs down for deceiving us.

[@stevenmayhew3944]

There are limits as to how far to see both the outermost universe and the innermost (quantum mechanical) universe.

[@harrywalker968]

why not fix earth first,,instead of looking at someone elses house.???... 00000.1 %, of ''space exploration''... would fix earth, educate people , stop people killing, starving to death,, for your fkn enjoyment.. ''ooohh,,look at that galaxy;;;'''... yes,,&???....

[@robinac6897]

Yet another piece of meaningless unreadable junk commenting.

[@earthwizz]

If dark matter/energy constitutes around 95% of the universe, every theory we've had about what the universe is and how it works has been made from observations of less than 5% of it. What are the chances of any of them being remotely right? I've always found 'in the beginning there was nothing which then exploded' a bit much to swallow. Frankly, not too far away from 'the great bearded sky daddy did it'. We need to get our heads around the notion that we're looking at less than 5% of the universe.

[@paultyson4389]

They have invented dark matter, which we can't see, because without it, their models don't work. Yeah, there was nothing in the beginning and now we have trillions of galaxies, out of nothing that was in a very small space to begin with. I need a lot more before I am convinced.

[@paulscowcroft7926]

'Dark matter' is just cold molecular hydrogen which is difficult to detect, and there is no 'dark energy' as there is no expansion. Cosmic redshift are due to light losing energy to the molecular hydrogen that fills intergalactic space by the same mechanism observed in the phenomenon of 'laser-induced molecular alignment'.

[@earthwizz]

@@paulscowcroft7926 And there was I thinking 'dark' meant unable to detect rather than difficult to detect, but maybe you have a different interpretation of 'dark' to the rest of the science community. I'm sure if they knew it was cold molecular hydrogen that's what they would call it rather than 'we've got no idea what it is', the actual meaning of 'dark'. It's not a sin to admit we lack the information to know what the universe is and how it works. I find it remarkably anthropocentric to imagine we do.

[@OmegaUberDeathbot]

I never subscribed to the dark matter hypothesis. It always sounded like either, or humors in my mind. We probably just don’t know some abstract physics of matter yet.

[@earthwizz]

@@OmegaUberDeathbot I suspect there's quite a lot of abstract physics of matter we don't know yet. Probably orders of magnitude more than what we know.

[@andrewhodgkins2292]

Of course we don't have the full story. There are things we don't know and may never know. That's OK so long as we keep looking. What isn't OK is to fill in the gaps between the things we know with crap from the middle ages. In addition,, there have always been those within the scientific community who have questioned the Big Bang Theory (BBT). The BBT became the preferred solution over Fred Hoyle's steady state theory because it fits with the evidence of universal expansion discovered by Edwin Hubble. However there have always been issues with BBT. Expansion theory was needed to overcome the biggest issue and even then it fails to resolve all the problems. So could BBT be wrong...of course it could and it means that physicists will continue to search for the truth, wherever the evidence takes them.

[@immortalsofar5314]

"Nobody had ever tried to prove that the universe didn't exist, just in case they turned out to be right." - Terry Pratchett.

[@thomasmleahy6218]

Subject to change, with or without notice.

[@carlhitchon1009]

Yes, but not without some kicking and screaming and the old bosses dying off.

[@RichWoods23]

You mean inflation, not expansion.

[@ohheyemmi]

So much this. People think science says "this thing is absolutely 100% unquestioningly true" when the reality is "this thing seems to be true based on all available evidence, but is subject to change when/if new information is discovered." People point to scientists changing opinions over the years as "proof" that science is flawed or whatever, but don't make the very next step and ask why their opinions changed, which is usually because some new phenomenon or thing is discovered. Pro Tip - Your opinions and beliefs SHOULD change with new information. That doesn't make opinions weaker but stronger because you aren't limiting yourself to what was available at the time. Your opinions and beliefs should NOT be rigid or unchangeable and 100% should be re-evaluated when new information is presented.

[@mycreativewar]

There is too much unrelated and low quality stock footage in this video. It makes it confusing knowing what footage is actually real

[@franzmuller235]

I understand that astro-physicists need not have much knowledge of the greek alphabet, but some basics shouild be expected. The greek letter Lamda that stands for the dark energy is actually pronounced "L" and not "A". PLEASE, that really hurts!

[@EYES200M]

Thanks for your feedback! We will fix it in our next video! Have a good day!

[@marccohen5477]

If there was one Big Bang, couldn't an earlier Bang have created these older galaxies?

[@jors3028]

Yeah, why only one Big Bang? Assumptions are always what limits science.

[@gaminawulfsdottir3253]

Since spacetime did not exist before the big bang, it's meaningless to question what might have existed "before" the big bang; there was no "before". (Which is not to say that our big bang is or has been the only one.)

[@anitahamel4576]

@@jors3028 Why not multiple Big Bangs? After all they talk about multi-universes...

[@tywinders7628]

Science proves science wrong every day. "Follow the science" they say. 😂

[@paulm749]

Exactly. That's how science works.

[@aidanmargarson8910]

yes science is self correcting .. so unlike religion

[@martinwilliams9866]

There is no THE Science!

[@tywinders7628]

Today's "science" is garbage. It's paid for results. They seem to only find the answers their funders want

[@jimbussey1888]

This might be based on a true story.

[@peterjackson2801]

Astrophysicists are studying this all the time. If something doesn't work out how they expect they re-evaluate their equations. Thats science. They don't just say "it just happened". We leave that to creationists.

[@Derrick-k9w]

How do you know your looking back in time ? Is there nothing in front of us and everything behind ?

[@myne00]

If they were closer, the gravity would be higher, and gravity influences time. So... Could time have been (relatively) slower, as is it around a black hole? Couldn't that theoretically explain why they appeared to form faster, and perhaps why the universe appears to be expanding faster?

[@charlescreamerii2715]

You might be onto something. My thought is that at the earliest expansion of the universe. All that gravity from matter being in such close proximity, time dialation within the event horizon of the bubble of the material universe was off the scales to such an extent millions or billions of years pass inside the bubble but if you could stand outside of it, as an observer, only 6 earth days would've passed for you like the Bible claims... and it may still be true today. Outside of our expansion might be slower time or no time at all.🤷‍♂️

[@arturama8581]

Old theory. Nothing new. And the James Webb hasn't broken The Big Bang. The only thing broken are channels like this one, that need clicks and make up BS stories to get them.

[@beingsentient]

I agree that the question of time dilation is obvious, yet it's not mentioned in the video. Time dilation occurs with a gravitational field, and also with relative velocities. The gravitational process seems to suggest the opposite of what we observe. In a gravitational field, time SLOWS down, compared to those outside the field. Thus, the galaxies would have even less time to develop back then in their enormously greater gravitational field. So we have to look for relative velocities as the explanation for dilation. That could work in the right way. For instance, when a guy takes a rocket trip then returns, he is much younger than the rest of the world, who all experiences faster time relative to him. So if we are moving much faster now in our expanding space, relative to back then, the time scale back then would've been much faster. So the puzzle is, why wasn't it mentioned?

[@stargazer7644]

​@@beingsentient Except that galaxies don't have an "enormously" greater gravitational field. They are not dense objects - their mass is spread out over huge amounts of space. Time dilation in galaxies compared to empty space is tiny just as time dilation on Earth (which is in a galaxy) is tiny compared to empty space.

[@jonathanrolfsen4656]

Happy to see someone else commented this. This is one of the possibilities my mind simulated. It's also good to ask about the shape of the expansion of the universe though too, where we are in that shape, and how much of our deductions are simply biased by the tiny area that we have observability over.

[@carlosortega8357]

The narrator refers to a scientist as Einstein, when the written form is different, Eisenstein. (30:17)

[@gaminawulfsdottir3253]

The narrator gets a lot of stuff wrong.

[@endergt]

Also mispronounces Cassini

[@franknugent2801]

its amazing and gives mew faith in humanity

[@andrewhodgkins2292]

Very true but you should realise that the laws of physics are only valid within the boundary of out universe. Therd remain important questions about the border itself and around black holes and other inexplicable celestial entities.

[@davidcrighton9566]

Not with guys like Putin around..

[@willpiparo973]

If we look in 1 direction and know the galaxies are moving away from us then we look in the opposite direction and see the galaxies moving away from us, does that mean we are standing still or are we really in a video game ?

[@johnsonjjohnson100]

Every time we advance technology, the arrogance of human knowledge that would belittle and write off anyone who would disagree has to rewrite our entire understanding. This should create humility yet simply transfer our arrogance to the new popular theories The entire idea of matter being "created" by an explosion of pure energy and then organizing itself into billions of highly organized solar systems goes against everything we actually KNOW to be true Yet we put "faith" in these constantly disproved theories simply to exclude an obvious conclusion that would require that there is a simple solution that has stared mankind in the face from his beginning

[@highpointsights]

I want desperately to click the "like" button but having trouble because what does exist is being tied to some rather extremely theoretical time lines!! Pet theories will be resuscitated and employed to explain what we are seeing!!

[@Odysseuss.]

As always. Still look on the bright side $$$$

[@angharaddenby3389]

How far will these millions of new-found galaxies go to explaining all the 'missing matter' that scientists have been going on about for years? It would be nice to know. Also, how and why are these scientist so certain that they have measurements of mass correct in the first place? Could they just ne fr heavier than they thought?

[@morgainnejade]

How & why are they so certain indeed.

[@ericshutter5305]

There is no missing matter. it's only missing knowledge in the scientists brains. Any scientist telling he/she knows how much matter there exists in the Universe is completely crazy and should be taken to a mental hospital the same day.

[@tuxsax]

It always amazes me how much money and time we humans invest in getting it all wrong to begin with. I really pay a lot of respect to astrophysicists, but I think we're overlooking some important stuff and most probably, the urge to "know" and to explain everything makes them "round the corners" and find explanations that match what we have... I wish I had a chance to sit with a few of those renowned astrophysicists and explain them why I think they're all missing the point... I'm not a scientist, I simply have a different view of universe and I believe those laws of physics they all claim universe goes by are not so accurate. We're looking at the universe, which its vastness and size is unimaginable to us, and analyzing a mere snapshot taken via a needle hole narrow view and applying what we see in our limited knowledge of 3-4 dimensions.

[@scottcortez1313]

you do realize that those 'laws of physics' the astrophysicist claim the universe goes by allows you to use the cell phone or laptop you just used to post your comment. so they got some parts right.

[@Puyax01]

​@scottcortez1313 you kind of got ahead of me on commenting something similar. The amount of technology progress we enjoy thanks to them and all the inventions that came out of it. Scientists continue to investigate everything they can, even the ocean at crazy depth but water pressure makes it difficult.

[@ssjfroku]

​@scottcortez1313 sure they can solve miniscule shit like that here on Earth but they'll never find their "missing link" in evolution, they'll never prove their big bang theory, they'll never even make a discovery here in Earth's waters 😂 they are stumped. We have to accept there are places we won't reach and things we won't understand. Not that we shouldn't try but to accept the stuff we know is unobtainable.

[@Puyax01]

@ssgssgouki8927 they had found tons of evidence. If you do some basic invesgation there have been al sorteo of studies backed with tons of repetitive tests. Basically evidence, something any religion lacks of, just personal feelings.

[@ssjfroku]

@@Puyax01 Romans 1:20 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. The evidence is in the eternal universe to know that this is INFINITE. NO BEGINNING. NO END. God always was and always will be. There is no "birthing" of the universe, that's the human mind putting up a roadblock making you think you HAVE to have beginning that you have to be birthed but that's from a human standpoint.

[@DjeminiStudios]

So basically... we spent TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS of dollars on trying to "answer" some questions about the universe while half the world starved to death, only to find out you were horribly wrong. And now they want TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS more to do it all over again? Maybe it time to ask a better question, "What do rich liars, thieves and murderers taste like after tar and feathering them?"

[@johnrday2023]

NASA has rec'd much legitimate criticism for its very expensive, discredited and aged, non-renewable SLS rocket Artemis mission, yet NASA has not been given its due credit for its many wonderfull and successfull missions for outer space exploration like JWST, Parker Solar, Mars helicopter, etc, etc. It seems NASA is in need of drastic and streamlined reorganisation (and remove much of its overweight/overaged politicised bureaucracy) !

[@bobgreene2892]

(At 30:18) Astrophysicist Daniel Eisenstein is pronounced "Einstein" and shortly after, video clips of Albert Einstein appeared. Is your production company looking for a script editor and proof reader? On second thought, maybe, all you need is a staffer who gives the whole production a final review. The video is jammed with stock clips of nameless people staring eagerly at computer screens, when we might have viewed more space images, instead. Finally, the video title suggests JWST challenges the "Big Bang" theory, but the video itself does not even whisper about an antecedent for the current universe. Over all, a disappointment, so we decided not to subscribe at this time.

[@tommymulley559]

Ladies and gentlemen the first actual non trolling legit comment ever on KZbin 🎉🎉😂😂😂someone actually critiqued the video with usable info!!!🎉🎉🎉🎉😂😂😂way to go!!!

[@M2008tw]

That part also annoyed me... it loses a bit of its credibility when you can sit and read the name mentioned but then they say something else and on top of that it shows the wrong person - who in his time was certainly not completely crazy with his theory 😊

[@anitahamel4576]

@@tommymulley559 Proofreading services were offered but "video" was spelled "bideo" LOL.

[@bobgreene2892]

@@anitahamel4576 My post was written on the tiny screen keyboard of my cellphone. When I proofread my post, i found i had no option to edit. This is unexpected contrast to the options offered on a computer screen. Your own post does.not consider such minor details.

[@anitahamel4576]

@@bobgreene2892 Don't fret. It"s just that I got a chuckle out of it. The meaning was obvious. I make mistakes all the time. Auto-correct is a bitch, too. Tripped me up many times, still does. All good.

[@brendavinesett1699]

I dont believe there was a Big Band, there was creation by a supreme being, GOG ALMIGHTY

[@Gérard-g5q]

That was wy may of thinking

[@frankfreeman1444]

We know for a fact that creation was gifted to us by our Lord, The Flying Spaghetti Monster! All praise to his Holy Noodles! Ramen!

[@doctaber2213]

I love GOG. I buy all their games.

[@Sola_Scriptura_1.618]

The scientific law of cause and effect can only be true if their is infact a God. Without God, this fundamental scientic law can not exist!

[@rugadhsaor4469]

Absolutely Ludacris

[@derekmiller6091]

You’re so funny!

[@aaronsmith593]

For 36 minutes you still explained nothing or do you explain your title. So what's your point or conclusion?!?

[@EYES200M]

I understand your concern. The title of the video may have led you to expect a specific conclusion or point. However, sometimes scientific discussions, especially about complex topics like the universe, may not always lead to a single clear conclusion or point. Instead, they may provide information, insights, and ongoing research that contribute to our understanding of the topic.

[@shawnaffeldt7426]

I have seen videos that show the visible area of our universe, that is the boundaries of how far away light has had time to travel over 13 billion years, may be just a tiny slice of the actual universe that exists, so how can we ever see all the way back to the beginning? If the universe is older than the distance light has traveled, so far, how can we ever see beyond this threshold? How can we ever see the beginning? The oldest light out there is 13 billion years or so, there could be another 20 billion years of space out there before the big bang ever happened, or whatever started the universe, I hope I explained this clearly, it gets confusing, I mean how can we see beyond the time limit of light that has traveled so far? We cant, and never will be able to, is my point!

[@the3gamingnerds458]

God goes beast mode and straight explodes a whole universe in existence and didn't break a sweat.

[@bobs182]

God produced a ton of sweat and was completely exhausted for 9 months. The lactic acid build up in his muscles was tremendous. Then there is Mrs God who worked overtime on the project keeping hot meals ready for God.

[@Ducatirati]

Could it have been a massive bang or just a big one ?

[@eventhorizon4879]

This is gonna hurt a lot of atheists' feelings 😂

[@cerabraladventures]

Amen

[@mrotaku183]

Also every religious person thinks it's their God

[@Nehemiah_Scudder]

Scientists do not spend billions to confirm what they ready "know", they spend billions to *test* what they have hypothesised and see if they can find something new to hypothesise about. Scientists do not say _"I don't know, therefore God"_ they say _"I don't know, yet"_

[@MrBrianJohnOBrien]

Have you ever wondered if the universe is actually getting smaller rather than larger? i.e. space is constant size but matter is shrinking? How do you determine if light is 'focused', isn't there some way of telling the distance something is from us by the lack of focus, like an f/stop on a camera?

[@pfcpriddy]

What if these Galaxies happened to be around before the big bang?

[@pfcpriddy]

I'm just an average guy with an average IQ, but is that a plausible theory?

[@billyhndrsn4542]

​@@pfcpriddy theoretically it is plausible, on the averages you speak of.

[@RichWoods23]

​@@pfcpriddy No, it's not plausible to have something like a galaxy, composed of stars and planets and moons and other discrete structures requiring several states of matter held together by the four fundamental forces, to exist before there was space-time in which they could exist, at a temperature which allows the forces to split after their unification energy is no longer attainable. You either need to redefine galaxy into something which is not a galaxy or reject all our cosmological and physical theories (which are supported by evidence; they're not just blind guesses) and present an alternative to the Big Bang which also explains *all* the observations we currently have. In reality, it's more likely that fresh observations will provide us with better estimates of the age of the galaxies and with tighter error bars, indicating where we might look to understand and explain the present anomalies. This does include the possibility of reassessing the age of the universe. There's an awful amount of hyped-up misunderstanding flying around at the moment, mostly coming from people who have a vested interest in pushing their religious dogma or in selling yet more pseudo-scientific books to a credulous public. And some people are just flat-out ignorant -- or liars -- spewing utter nonsense in order to stroke their egos.

[@pfcpriddy]

@RichWoods23 Ahh ok ok, thank you for the response. That makes sense. So basically, the age of the universe is older than we first thought with the hubble telescope.

[@RichWoods23]

@@pfcpriddy Some of the Hubble observation programs did contribute to assessments of the expansion rate of the universe, but the other primary line of evidence is the measurement of the cosmic microwave background radiation (mostly from the WMAP and Planck probes, at least during the era that we've also had Hubble, and which do indicate an age a little older than did the Hubble contributions). Now that we've got JWST it'll add to that overall assessment, but only properly once the relevant observation programs for it have been completed and fully analysed. This is why I so strongly dislike the current level of hype -- one anomalous observation, early in the lifetime of the instrument, while it's still being broken in, and people are yelling that the sky is falling down. It's madness. Do you remember how the Hubble needed to be fitted with corrective optics back in 1993, because of a fault that affected some of its instruments? Until all the tests of JWST have been completed, until it's shown to not be adversely affected by its environment, until we have a large number of observations which don't contradict each other, we can't be sure that a launch problem or space debris or whatever hasn't affected a mirror panel or one of the instruments, or simply that someone hasn't miscalculated or mis-engineered something. It's pointless jumping to conclusions about fundamental cosmology until all the data is in, but people are impatient and don't tend to grasp the complexities. Anyway, I hope that helps. I'm glad you had the good sense to phrase your thought as a question rather than in the style of the worlds-shattering proclamation that certain parties are inclined to use!

[@slyfoxxsr.941]

So then Jesus dit it!

[@chrismillard5172]

Yep

[@brianm.2718]

The big bang has only been a speculative 'fact' subjectively adhered to disregard the existence of a Creator.

[@Puyax01]

Of only there was evidence of a creator. Because if there was any evidence the religious would be milking it hard. So far god of gaps.

[@peterhladky5481]

I don't understand how you can use red-shift to determine distance. Surely the red-shift is a combination of an objects velocity w.r.t. the observer and the expansion of the universe. So an object could be close but moving away really fast. I'm sure this has been thought through but I don't understand it. Also, if the passage of time were to simply be changes in entropy of the universe than in an early, denser, space time one would expect time to run faster since the interactions would have less distance to travel. A denser universe may have had a stronger gravitational constant. Just my simplistic views

[@ahdziz666]

Redshift based time measurements are constantly revised as new data and analysis becomes available. The local velocities of most structures that are visible at all aren't as consequential as you might think at first and can often be averaged out due to cyclical movement such as orbiting.

[@gleambrite2679]

They say the "big bang" and give out dates with such conviction. 13.8 billion years ago. On and on...The more you learn, the more you learn, you know nothing. An ounce of humility can go a long way. We seem stuck right now and going nowhere. That's when it's time to go back to the drawing board.

[@shahidmalik2952]

impressive,very educating presented in a simple way amazing scietific facts presented very gently