Big Plan: Russia Unveils Upgraded Tu-95MSM Bomber, Ready for Combat!

[@emmanuelubaha5815]

Tu-95 is an older platform but still formidable.With ability to launch kh 101& 102 long range missiles together with its ability to jam both ground and aerial radars gives it the ability to dominate on the battlefield. TU-95 long range bombers are formidable aerial platform for the Russian MoD. And its versatility has been proven in ukraine's battlefield.

[@demukazz]

Dude, high flying platform to launch 8 advanced cruise missiles?! That's tactically strategical overkill

[@TimeCells2035]

"is an older platform" It's not "older" anymore. It's fully updated.

[@emmanuelubaha5815]

@@TimeCells2035 that is, in relation to TU- 160m. This new platform has the ability to attack enemy assets from the rear.

[@AlexanderTch]

Tu-95 is much younger platform than American B-52, although USA has 1.5 times more B-52s in service than Russia has Tu-95. Last B-52 was built in 1962. Russia uses only the most recent modification T-95MS, which where built in 80s and 90s, so , they are relatively modern bombers, though USA has 64 B-52s, while Russia has just 44 Tu-95MSMs

[@TDS1108Gaming]

@@TimeCells2035Buddy maybe you should look up what “platform” means. First flown in 1952, entered service in 1956, and last unit rolled off the production plant in 1993. It’s like calling a 1958 Classic muscle car “brand new” after you drop in a new a new transmission and new tires on it.

[@Jimmy-ye3wg]

Long live the BEAR, legend of the sky's.

[@johnmcentegart007]

The Russian Bomber fleet is massive. People don’t realize how powerful the Russian Air Force is. Including the supersonic bombing 6:00 jets the Russians have in their inventory

[@USCFlash]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 yet they only have a dozen functional TU 160s, 3 dozen functional TU22s, and a couple a dozen functional TU95s. "Massive". Yeah, 90% of that formerly massive fleet is out of commission. The Russian Air Force sucks. They cannot even destroy or fly over the country right next door.

[@munkfish101]

The Russian airforce looks good on paper but unfortunately in reality it’s not great. In 3 years they haven’t been able to gain air superiority in Ukraine. Don’t get me wrong they still have a half decent airforce but against a near peer adversary they wouldn’t last long.

[@JohnnysCafe_]

People like USCF here don't have a clue, the media has controlled their ability to think. The comments they make are like that of children.

[@andrewmcewan8081]

all you fans seem to forget how badly maintained the russian airforce are, also you seem to ignore the fact ukraine has managed to down at least one of every russian air to ground missiles, many of them even before they got all the advanced defence systems.

[@JohnnysCafe_]

@andrewmcewan8081 oh Andrew you already know western media lies to you yet you still chose to believe it. You are paying more for food and power to help your government recoup it's share of the $180 billion in military hardware that has been destroyed by a superior military. You know all that equipment is gone yet you still think Russia uses inferior hardware, well if that's the case the West's military hardware must have been useless because Russia has destroyed it. Think for yourself Andrew, don't repeat what is so obviously nonsense.

[@BB-gr9hq]

Older planes like the Tu 95 and the B-52 can still get the job done as long as they can carry cruise (or ballistic) missiles that use stealth or speed to penetrate contested airspace.

[@JohnnysCafe_]

Glory to Russia 🇷🇺💪🇷🇺💪🇷🇺

[@ViceCoin]

Great times for fans of weapons technology.😊

[@JimRon-s5q]

Viva RUSSIA

[@EricBowser111]

Russians think the same way I do. I'd ride 87 Caprice Classics forever & I'd fly that TU-95 FOREVER too! Forget jets.

[@Juandinggong]

A cruise missile flying 5000 km is pretty insane

[@wususesay3918]

I'm getting rid of a washing machine, any Russian interested let me know. 😅. Not bad for washing machine chips

[@GregDeman]

Contact the US Navy, they are currently looking for solutions to prevent shooting down their own planes 😂

[@joeschmoe21]

An American F-16 was shot down yesterday. Apparently it was an old Russian tumble-dryer that was hurled at the American F16, and the American F16 instantly tumbled down to the ground. US-proxy Ukraine, with $200 Bln of Patriots, F16s, Abrahams, is being severely spanked by Russian laundry equipment.

[@tunny5802]

Old Russian tanks and artillery do not need computer chips.

[@TimeCells2035]

4:54 we see that this aircraft can carry 16 missiles. Isn't that right?

[@kennethmorrison7689]

A wonderful aircraft!

[@Dskywalker-j7k]

Urraaaa 💪

[@blenozaro8980]

Yes right. ISW right? They are so objective and truthful ,Bs

[@WaVeTECH-b9z]

Exciting times for enthusiasts of weapons technology.

[@pachuco1815]

Power to Russia!

[@atanasvasilev3228]

73 years old plane, huh? To fly additional 30 the least. This carrier is perfect for Russia. It's hard to go deep in Russia, but it's easy for Russia to come from the deep. 😁😁

[@timferguson1526]

Flying Truck of Death!❤ Russia makes beautiful machines❤

[@NAVYABHAN]

Did they use quieter propellers?

[@Masterafro999]

why would they? are you going to hear the bomber in mainland europe whilst it launches its payload from withing rus airspace? i highly doubt that.. .

[@carlitobrigante6304]

Does it now have a crew toilet on board?

[@MrMouse71]

иди мусор подметай за неграми

[@joeschmoe21]

A Russian space-craft recently rescued the American crew from the International Space Station. Apparently the Americans had filled up the toilets in the ISS and badly needed to return to earth but American space-crafts are too inferior to get the job done. Google it up.

[@Masterafro999]

didnt it always have one? even smaller rus jet bombers have toilets......and the bmp-3..

[@tokomac7728]

is it one off or serial production

[@mohdsautiembong5742]

Nice

[@waynethorpe1341]

American Bombers have become increasingly Costly to run, and upgraded Versions have come with Huge Costs Overruns.

[@jonathanfriedlander8563]

VERY GOOD NEWS .

[@Ali-hu8jr]

That's what i think 2-3 years ago.

[@AntonioRomero-te4cb]

💪🇷🇺 Z V

[@NAVYABHAN]

Looking at the video, I can see the Pilots have their masks on. Is this Aircraft pressurized?

[@Mikhelinx]

yes...very pressurized from high attitude

[@Olivier_The_Dilettante]

still large, slow, thus vulnerable, good for reconnaissance, long time in air carrying ordinance.

[@planje4740]

- убацити млазне моторе а конструкција сама од себе већ тако - да то може летјети јако високо

[@krzysztofgregorczyk1443]

Piękne ale czy skuteczne

[@PortmanRd]

I'm sure it won't be long before we find out.

[@jonathanfriedlander8563]

ALL THE WAY RUSSIA !!

[@BabayoZubairu-ff9kv]

It's carry nuke 😂😂😂

[@dingodog5677]

It has a chin like one of the old guys in the Muppets Show. 🤣 but it is a beast.👍

[@jonathanfriedlander8563]

RUSSIA !!

[@tonythomson1276]

Haha,ive never looked at this and seen Ernie from the muppets til now oh u have made me think of that old show and chuckle.nice one...

[@slimygrimy-l7m]

Russia ❤

[@jonathanfriedlander8563]

🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

[@jojotakuma4622]

I heard ,they got all the new upgrades from China 🇨🇳 😳 and we all know about China s things ,don't last 😅😅

[@stevevojtek8856]

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@jonathanfriedlander8563]

🇳🇿🇳🇿🇷🇺🇷🇺

[@juanfermin8173]

Obviously this is a pro russian military channel , I check other videos too and is all about Russia , "Russia this " "Russia that ".

[@Alpenmn]

Sir this channel talk about whats going on in ukraine and tells what the western media (ew 🤮🤢🤢) didnt tell the public, like western guns being captured by russians what i meant is that the channel isnt 1 sided, if you watch the channel long enough you can see that it also supports ukraine like talking about a russian tank destroying a western aided tank (example) and then he proceed to talk about the weaknesses of the russian tank so its NOT really a pro russian channel not 1 sided either.

[@johnmaurer2035]

The U.S. and NATO weren't interested in reaching any solution about Ukraine. In fact, they caused the conflict. Russia can tough it out, and ultimately prevail.

[@ricardolevy885]

Well it gives a little bit of ballance as 99% of other channels only talk about Russia is losing, russia is incompetent and blah blah blah, if you want to hear that you have infinite options on KZbin western propaganda.

[@damsb.6078]

There's a lot of information coming from both sides of the conflict. You can also find some really ukrainian biased channels. If you want to get informed by only one side go check these channels. But if you want to get informations from both sides and use your brain to process it and find a middle ground watching pro-russian channel can help. Just use your brain.

[@TonioMercurio-s4h]

If this is a ProRussian,it's only because only the Russians tell the truth.Not all that bullshite that the USA and European are dishing out.❤ Russia. 😅😅😅

[@evawoodrruff6643]

Useless story!

[@soberanobrasil9370]

Why useless?

[@RoboRat-b7r]

@soberanobrasil9370 coz its not fitting their narrative.

[@ViceCoin]

Even B52 is getting new engines.

[@soberanobrasil9370]

@@RoboRat-b7r sorry... which is?

[@jeffhedrich3551]

Correct. It can’t be used by pro Ukraine media.

[@vladimircurkoski1455]

The Bear is old it should be put in retirement not modernization

[@Rooikunbo]

The American B-52 is also quite old, but both aircraft offer capabilities that newer models struggle to provide while remaining cost-effective for acquisition and operational use.

[@lexburen5932]

no it will serve till atleast 2040. and as commented this plane offer capabilitys that newer models struggle to provide.

[@InternetExplorer-s9g]

B-52 was introduced in 1952

[@TheJZP]

B52: hold my beer 😂

[@USCFlash]

@@Rooikunbo "but both aircraft offer capabilities that newer models struggle to provide while remaining cost-effective for acquisition" Idiotic statement....not a single B52 or TU95 has been an "acquisition" in over 60 years and 30 years respectively.