How theoretical and experimental physicists clash, fight, and make physics better | Janna Levin

[@HipHopMovieNews]

I absolutely love this lady. I can listen to her talk about physics all day.

[@bruceneeley1724]

As a life long Artist, Physics & Quantum Mechanics have always been my passion because of how they inspire such wonderfully imaginative thinking. Great video Janna Levin. Bravo! Take care! 🕊

[@steliosp1770]

Love Janna. Thank you for being who you are and doing what you do!

[@jayk5549]

Wow. So eloquently stated. Could listen to her for an hour

[@heristyono4755]

The Multiverse doesn't meet our criteria for science, but it does not mean it isn't real. The same goes to the supernatural.

[@Vectorized_mind]

😂😂No No,you seem to be ignorant of how the PSEUDOSCIENCE of multiverse theory was developed. Assuming time is a dimension..you create a matrix (say 3×3) with integers in it representing time and you create another matrix(say 3×3) and you multiply both matrices and end up getting multiple dimensions (say 12 or 76 dimensions depending on the integers in a individual matrix)so there's no empirical evidence or clues that this PSEUDOSCIENCE(multiverse theory) exists,just mathematicians getting lost in mathematics. This is why 98% of the physics community don't believe in multiverse theory(string theory). Again the worst part is you can get different integers of dimensions depending on how you set up the matrices so you can get 100 dimensions or more commonly believed by string theorists '12 dimensions' according to the calculations of string theorists.

[@bwderge187]

In another universe, i can see the “1 reply”

[@NelsonGuedes]

This is the best video about physics I have ever watched. I suspect the "problem" with physics today is that we don't imagine enough. We take the history of physics, in the form of what we believe to be fundamental descriptions of our reality, and we assume that this is the only possible description of reality. Perhaps all of our physics is wrong. Perhaps there is another way to describe physics that would resolve the perceived contradictions that we haven't been able to reconcile.

[@Painter99]

When building the theory of everything. Everything can be boiled down to numbers and an ever shifting structure of formulas that is internally consistent and yet is beyone what any mind can know because the numbers get really big. And really small. Whirlpools of entropy and chaos. The dream starts to fade into the daunting reality of infinity. But an even more daunting reality of the nothing. The objective. The void as some call it. The exestential dread and the desire to paint color and light and meaning into the equivelent of random strings of information. Which is what essentially humans are. Just information. But finding the color and light especially in science is what always pushes me to keep learning more!

[@AdrianDMarti]

Gotta love this!

[@kurtuetz3195]

Hi Janna, one question on the position that dark matter is affecting galaxies and cosmic expansion thru gravitational calculations. If a 3 body problem with gravity is beyond our ability to determine the body dynamics, how can physicists speculate that something(dark matter) is affecting billions of galaxies? It appears to be attempting to solve a billion(s) body problem.

[@spodvoll]

Insufficient imagination does not seem to be a problem with physics today. In fact, the real problem is a failure to distinguish bona fide science from math wizards playing Dungeons and Dragons. A theory is *not* simply something one dreams up after a few bong hits, even if the related mathematical proofs are as elegant as a masquerade ball at Windsor Palace. A theory makes testable predictions. "Math is a language and a language can tell stories. 'The Hobbit' is a story but just because it can be written down doesn't mean magic rings exist. So it goes with way too much theoretical physics that is nothing of the kind; it is just plain fiction." - Hank Campbell "If you accept that science doesn't say anything about the existence of those other universes one way or another, and you just decide to believe in them, then that's religion." "If you assume that unobservable universes exist and write papers about them, then that's pseudoscience." - Sabine Hossenfelder

[@꽃길-k8r]

What a kindness, speaking very slowly. 😉

[@leeyan9049]

Janna is a cool and beautiful human being

[@jbangz2023]

The ultimate question is where did the original matter and energy come from, scientists pretend to know everything.

[@komalpanchal06]

Big bang is the holy crap which stops them from thinking beyond a boom.

[@donovanchapman7589]

Many scientists also admit that we know little about many things

[@shaksonaskrt]

Very interesting❤

[@mireillelebeau2513]

I see the imporance of dreaming and experimenting.

[@VTheme-z]

To obtain financial freedom, one must either be a business owner, an investor or both, generating passive income, particularly on a weekly and monthly basis. That's the key to living a financially stable life. This trick has never failed. I pray that anyone who reads this will be successful in life and put this basis to work and practice. Jessica Darrell have been a great manager, mentor and guide. Her support and advice has helped shaped my crypto trading career.

[@nicklassvensson]

I get a lot of recommendations for Jessica Darrell from friends. Her strategy must be good for people to testify a lot about her.

[@marisachan482]

I have been getting so many recommendations about her as well how do I reach her

[@VTheme-z]

For real she's very profitable

[@VTheme-z]

Whole life is a joke in every sense, the investment side of a whole life policy gives the poor return and stabilized the rich

[@matsvandevelde166]

How does this whole crypto thing works I'm interested in it and willing and ready to invest heavily but I need an assistant to properly guide me through on how to make a good startup and be successful in it without making mistakes

[@Hydroverse]

I still think our physics is broken, but no one seems brave enough to venture into new paradigms.

[@Vectorized_mind]

True, Einsteinein theory is wrong, gravity is not the bending of space(most of his claims are unproved)but that doesn't mean you can't make predictions with his erroneous theories It just implies that it has it's limitations when trying to apply it,for example time dilation is not the result of time slowing down or moving faster it's because of the magnetism the earth radiates, the lower you are the stronger the magnetism, the further you are the less effect it has thus effecting the materials of the clock(this is also why atomic clocks work best in space their less prone to being magnetically influenced because of the materials they're made of), it's a matter of interpretation. Quantum mechanics is the worst one,I don't even want to get into it or I might start typing a whole paper on KZbin.

[@eel908]

yeah you are on the right path of reasons why when what is going on with the universe thank you for sharing infinity chapter 8 tod

[@yashwantkumarjoshi4174]

Very authentic analysis, Allow me to add further, when we imagine about multiverse, then we are thinking in the right way. The universes could be infinite. Big bang does not occur only once to create only our universe. The event of big bang that we consider for the initiation of our universe might have initiated some more universes. It is like confining ourselves to consider the event of big bang exclusive to our universe only. The before state of Big Bang is infinite i.e. the before state of matter. Here other universe may have other form of matter, another may have another and so on. What we can infer here is that the pre big bang state cannot be mathematically proved it could only be assumed. What is in our hand to prove is only the post big bang events. Therefore, our existence is highly imaginative and philosophical. I hope we will find more rational answers to our existence with sharing of our thoughts 😊💐

[@elwitkauesa4148]

I’m a bit uncomfortable with word universe now... Does universe mean whole?.. If so then we can’t simply say universe within a universe, for example one universe here & another there in the same space-time continuum... I do understand the analogy that one’s body is universe inside itself and then oneself is inside a much grander universe or a multiverse finely packed “top of each other” with absolutely different types of scientific properties that’s contained inside the singular space-time continuum. My point is what’s the difference between having a group of universes (not be confused with multiverse) inside the space-time continuum & with same breath talk about a group of galaxies in the same space-time continuum?

[@Vectorized_mind]

😂😂No No,you seem to be ignorant of how the PSEUDOSCIENCE of multiverse theory was developed. Assuming time is a dimension..you create a matrix (say 3×3) with integers in it representing time and you create another matrix(say 3×3) and you multiply both matrices and end up getting multiple dimensions (say 12 or 76 dimensions depending on the integers in a individual matrix)so there's no empirical evidence or clues that this PSEUDOSCIENCE(multiverse theory) exists,just mathematicians getting lost in mathematics. This is why 98% of the physics community don't believe in multiverse theory(string theory). Again the worst part is you can get different integers of dimensions depending on how you set up the matrices so you can get 100 dimensions or more commonly believed by string theorists '12 dimensions' according to the calculations of string theorists.

[@wheredowegofromhere79]

I feel like relative to the volume she is speaking, the music is a bit loud. Would be easier to hear her if the music was softer.

[@0ptimal]

Stranger than fiction. But, depends who's looking.

[@frun]

Buddha and other eastern mystics told us we *can* perceive reality AS IT IS.

[@ReginaJune]

2:18 alien information theory from John Gallimore is in my Amazon cart

[@Jack-r2v9b]

DMT shows an Alien intelligence that completely surrounds us,in my opinion

[@DavidVeal]

I love this, but I do wish that she was correct, that when we make these discoveries we begin to rewrite our values about tribalism, violence, and all of that. I think our values just take new information and inventions and use them toward the same ends. We don't change a lot through continuing on the various scientific paths we have developing out there. Maybe we evolve those values in the future, but it will be through something else, something perhaps we have not conceived of yet. Till then, I'm happy we keep moving forward in the sciences.

[@SpotterVideo]

Conservation of Spatial Curvature (Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree. String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine. Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. ===================== Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length ) The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge. Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.

[@LlamaAlarma]

can't it be that dark matter isn't real but actually gravity can leak a bit between the multiverses she was talking about? If there's a galaxy at the same spot in a parallel universe it maybe could have gravitational influence on the ones "next" to it

[@Hydroverse]

Cool. I had a theory similar to this.

[@komalpanchal06]

Then how would you explain the same phenomenon occuring in the other multiverse-galaxy.

[@Vectorized_mind]

No,Dark matter is speculation rather not an observation, it's as real as a unicorn, physicist have alot of models for it but don't know what it is😐, it's like asking for directions but not knowing where you want to go. So at this point dark matter/energy is PSEUDOSCIENCE. today's physicists are retarded compared to the people of back in the day(Einstein, Tesla,Maxwell, Planck, Schrodingër,etc...)

[@LlamaAlarma]

@@komalpanchal06 I don't see the problem. If gravity leaks between parallel universes it goes both ways. Or did I misinterpret your question?

[@eel908]

Love is anger one of the same anger is love you understand what is t o d infinity chapter 8

[@melstricker8211]

While I agree that theoretical physics is important I do not believe Ms. Levin's view that this theoretical pursuit feeds into anything beyond physics and maybe other sciences.

[@tarotafterdark1077]

☀️ ❤

[@metaforically]

Are we rare? Or are we likely? 😊

[@kastenolsen9577]

Thought experement. Imagine this, move to the edge of the visible universe. Where are you at and how fast are you moving relative to earth? Now move farther from the earth to he edge of the "new" visible universe.again ask 'Where are you now and how fast are you moving relative to earth". Do this a trillion times and ask yourself the same question. Just how big is our true universe and is the speed of light the limit?

[@Hydroverse]

Interesting thought experiment.

[@davidrandell2224]

The CAUSE of gravity was published 21 years ago. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics. Grow up.

[@NotNecessarily-ip4vc]

How spiritual and material physicists clash, fight, and make physics better | Janna Levin

[@eel908]

i t is what start light sound dark matter sound spark life energy spirit never dies change form inside over and over again infinity chapter 8 tod decide never dies this is my world dreams become real real becomes a message from time has gone bye please to meet you hope you guess my name t o d infinity chapter 8

[@OfficialLunarFilms]

Jana is a babe!

[@Andrea-Rose]

🐇🐇🐇

[@tedyshor]

Life is a dream you wake up from when we die 🤷‍♂️

[@dima-rafael]

All the right questions and answers yet physics even theoretical physics like super string theory we still can’t tell : WHY?

[@PetraKann]

The dynamic between Theory and experiment is not exclusive to the simple field of Physics