Bill Nye Debates Ken Ham - HD (Official)

  Рет қаралды 10,636,541

Answers in Genesis

Answers in Genesis

10 жыл бұрын

Is Creation a Viable Model of Origins in Today’s Modern, Scientific Era? Watch a trimmed-down and fully edited version of this debate here: • Ken Ham CLASHES With B...
Leading creation apologist and bestselling Christian author Ken Ham hosted Emmy Award-winning science educator and CEO of the Planetary Society Bill Nye at the Creation Museum in February of 2014 for a live broadcast viewed by millions of people.
We've posted a list of recommended articles, videos, radio broadcasts, books, and other resources that answer the majority of Nye’s statements and questions:
answersingenesis.org/counteri...

Пікірлер: 15 000
@answersingenesis
@answersingenesis 5 ай бұрын
Watch a trimmed-down and fully edited version of this debate here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rH-noqiQd8Ssfqs
@NewLifeFromTheWayofTruth
@NewLifeFromTheWayofTruth 5 ай бұрын
I always like to ponder that maybe Mars was a planet for the angels before God stripped it from them 🤔
@BelfastManUtdTherapyReactions
@BelfastManUtdTherapyReactions 4 ай бұрын
Question for both men; What would it take for you to put your hands up and admit , albeit in shock, that the other guy was right? Bill Nye said if you found even one set of Kangeroo remains between the middle east and Australia then it would prove the Ark did end in the middle east and kangeroos etc moved down to australia directly from it. Ken Ham's rigid thinking is that god is real and theres nothing that could persuade him otherwise. What is the point then in him debating? if his mind is already made up and will not change?
@ThyBountyHunter
@ThyBountyHunter 4 ай бұрын
@@BelfastManUtdTherapyReactions When asked what if anything would change your mind, the closest thing Ken answered was stating nothing would change his mind. That is a closed mind. The statement of faith that is part of the AIG basically boils down to if the Bible says 2+2=5 then you have to accept that as men are fallible.
@oskirules
@oskirules 3 ай бұрын
Ken, this was so disappointing. Bill Nye was speaking science, you were mostly appealing to scriptures. I think you were at the wrong event that evening. You can bring in scripture as a bridge after you speak about science.
@bizarrefruit9133
@bizarrefruit9133 3 ай бұрын
Oh yeah, sure I will, I bet you took a really balanced approach as to what should remain and what should be cut(!) Unlike the gentleman you were debating, I'm perfectly prepared to say that your arguments were PATHETIC. I am in awe of his restraint, though even he couldn't prevent his feelings from being evident in his expression. You cite scientists and their evidence only when they agree with your view and disregard the vast majority with better evidence that don't while being completely open that there is no evidence that could possibly convince you that your beliefs aren't factual. The most valid point in your entire presentation was at 3:19 (the Dawkins foundation statement) and even that I can't agree with because at least there are 10 million people who were able to see the difference between a reasoned argument and pure ignorance as a result of this 'debate'. For that, I thank you.
@sweetlifealley
@sweetlifealley Жыл бұрын
Bill Nye the science Guy versus Ken Ham the Bible man
@eliasjakemoran6434
@eliasjakemoran6434 Жыл бұрын
Lol, Finally something we can all agree on
@davidandthatotherguy1369
@davidandthatotherguy1369 Жыл бұрын
No bill nye the leftist guy.
@eliasjakemoran6434
@eliasjakemoran6434 Жыл бұрын
@@davidandthatotherguy1369 And? He's still correct about everything he says here. His political opinions are irrelevant to this
@sweetlifealley
@sweetlifealley Жыл бұрын
@@davidandthatotherguy1369 I’m just being funny. I agree with Jesus on creation. (Even if Ken Ham is right or wrong)
@mrsantoro8306
@mrsantoro8306 Жыл бұрын
@@sweetlifealley lol you believe in a magic man. Do you also belief Gandalf is real?
@LarryBeeswax
@LarryBeeswax 8 ай бұрын
I always trust the guy who admits to not knowing everything versus the guy who claims to know everything.
@LarryBeeswax
@LarryBeeswax 7 ай бұрын
@@tadow_od Absolutely not.
@andreistoriei2050
@andreistoriei2050 7 ай бұрын
@@wendigo53 doesn't the bible say he knows everything lol and according to this people that's his word... so like I guess he is claiming to know everything even if he doesn't exist to claim it.
@Just-Chillin-Not-Here
@Just-Chillin-Not-Here 7 ай бұрын
Bill Nye discounts all the scientific evidence Ham presented, he does this and it results in a unfair argument where one side’s evidence is accepted and the other’s isn’t.
@DanielBice
@DanielBice 7 ай бұрын
@@andreistoriei2050Yeah, that’s what being an omniscient being means
@electroman224
@electroman224 7 ай бұрын
@@wendigo53 I mean, if God is as powerful as the Bible says, he can be blamed for pretty much everything that happens. All is within his control, therefore he bears the end blame for all things that happen, good or bad.
@blueduck5589
@blueduck5589 6 ай бұрын
"It is better to have a question that can't be answered than an answer that can't be questioned."--Carl Sagan
@loturzelrestaurant
@loturzelrestaurant 6 ай бұрын
Science-Denial always resembles previous Branches of itself. I dunno, maybe worth a thought before supporing something: maybe its GLOBALLY FROWNED UPON for a reason?
@BwanaFinklestein
@BwanaFinklestein 6 ай бұрын
...like anthropogenic global warming you mean?
@Tanner404
@Tanner404 6 ай бұрын
@@BwanaFinklestein Like large-scale election fraud
@gustavocruz2321
@gustavocruz2321 6 ай бұрын
Why? And better to whom? 🤔
@cWjkL8ysxOkrH66
@cWjkL8ysxOkrH66 6 ай бұрын
@@gustavocruz2321 Because by creating a false answer to the question you end the debate altogether, shutting down the ones who still want to know the facts. It's a defensive mechanism to maintain stupidity.
@tom1986ca
@tom1986ca 6 ай бұрын
When one side admits nothing will change their mind while the other side only needs evidence, it's obvious who's being intellectually honest and who isn't. This was awesome.
@lennardchurch8483
@lennardchurch8483 6 ай бұрын
The problem is that people like Bill are ideologues of the cult of Secular Humanism, and while they pretend that they'll always follow the evidence, they ignore any evidence that contradicts their beliefs. They function on faith that processes happened in nature to create what exists now, even though those processes are starkly contradicted by the universal laws of nature, which makes them objective impossibilities. For example, Variation within kinds of animals is the result of genetic variability already programmed into the DNA of species, caused to manifest by the removal of more dominant genetic traits through breeding. As such this variation is in full accordance with the law of Entropy, but is the opposite process from the one that the Secular Humanists claim created all of the kinds of anmials on Earth. The spontaneous emergence of new genetic code that turn one kind of animal into another doesn't happen, as it would violate the law of Entropy. Such change has never been observed anywhere on Earth. Yet Secular Humanists claim that Macro-evolution is "proven" even though it's actually utterly without evidence. In truth, the Secular Humanists conflate their hypotheses and conjecture with the actual facts, which is why people think there's actual evidence for Macro-Evolution, even though there isn't.
@globalcoupledances
@globalcoupledances 6 ай бұрын
@lennardchurch8483 - 1/64 of all mutations creates new genetic code
@lennardchurch8483
@lennardchurch8483 6 ай бұрын
@@globalcoupledances Mutations are the deterioration of DNA, errors in the replication of genetic code. They don't create new body parts, and they're universally neutral or detrimental to the survival of a species. There's a reason in modern biology mutations are called "genetic disorders".
@globalcoupledances
@globalcoupledances 6 ай бұрын
@lennardchurch8483 - Creationist dogma is that healthy genome doesn't survive, only bad mutations survive. According to creationists antibiotics are not necessary because the bacteria in your body underwent so many mutations that they become extinct.
@kirayoshikage1491
@kirayoshikage1491 6 ай бұрын
@@lennardchurch8483 are you serious with this comment? No mutations are good? That's just dumb, have you never heard about viruses? Or bacteria? Or farm animals? Or cash crops? Or literally any creature? We observe positive mutations constantly and you're just pretending we don't? Also, abiogenesis wasn't just 'poof' now there's DNA from nothing, all the chemicals were already there they just came together in a spontaneous way (you know, the way thermodynamic processes tend to happen)
@SpookyMingo
@SpookyMingo 11 ай бұрын
This is the kind of maturity we should be able to expect from our leaders. We need to raise the bar
@vade137
@vade137 11 ай бұрын
Our leaders are paid to confuse and frustrate Americans, it's on purpose. Nye is paid to deliver lies in a calm manner for those who take in info in this manner. The politicians and Nye are liars and are paid by the same group of people....these very people killed 40 million Christians in the early 1900's and will not let the event be taught in American schools...same people.
@tinobemellow
@tinobemellow 10 ай бұрын
Scientists are different than politicians. They are trained to learn and teach, not to govern and bicker over petty issues to maintain personal power.
@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n
@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n 10 ай бұрын
@@tinobemellow scientists gatekeep to protect their careers just like politicians. scientists are human beings with beliefs and views. Read Sheldrake he talks about how people who teach the passive voice in science are actually mediocre scientists. Sheldrake is branded a pseudo scientist because he rejects naturalistic dogma and wants to set science free.
@SpookyMingo
@SpookyMingo 10 ай бұрын
your way of saying adults shouldn't all be expected to act like adults is incredibly telling. No matter the occupation, we know how to be adults. People like you excusing their behavior is only beneficial to them so thanks a lot for holding us back by basically saying if you're a politician we can forget how we were raised.
@andyroubik5760
@andyroubik5760 10 ай бұрын
Wouldn't it be wonderful to have Trump behave similar to these gentlemen
@blackswan7568
@blackswan7568 9 ай бұрын
Regardless of who's side you're on, you have to admit this was a much more civil, respectful, and productive debate than anything we've seen on the political stage lately.
@JokerDoom
@JokerDoom 8 ай бұрын
It’s super refreshing, honestly. But I do think it has less to do with the political climate back then and more to do with the fact that both of these men are extraordinarily respectful and well meaning individuals who’ve managed to stay out of major controversies. I applaud and respect both of them.
@rogggggerful
@rogggggerful 8 ай бұрын
side you are on?
@valroniclehre193
@valroniclehre193 8 ай бұрын
Respectful in tone is not the same as respectful in concept. Ham is a liar. Just check his graph about wolves. Its upside down.
@jerryhechter2996
@jerryhechter2996 8 ай бұрын
Agreed on that, people have to start treating people like people
@keyan1219
@keyan1219 8 ай бұрын
Yeah no if you are on the creationist die who believes the universe is no more than 6000 years old you are wrong
@yoihoiminoi3661
@yoihoiminoi3661 5 ай бұрын
It’s nice to see that civil debates are possible, instead of the screaming matches we mostly see today. Also, it’s absolutely hilarious that Bill basically said “I’m very concerned about the way you think” to Ken
@turnip1744
@turnip1744 3 ай бұрын
Why
@HarryNicNicholas
@HarryNicNicholas 2 ай бұрын
i think it's time we stopped "respecting" religions, basically people like ken will support god in any immorality he wants to undertake, god kills everyone on the planet, ken is backing him all the way - it's sick.
@yoihoiminoi3661
@yoihoiminoi3661 2 ай бұрын
@@turnip1744 most “debates” I’ve seen online ends up with the two parties insulting each other 90% of the time. So I just thought it was nice to see one that didn’t
@turnip1744
@turnip1744 2 ай бұрын
@@yoihoiminoi3661 Bill is notorious for throwing insults during debates.
@yoihoiminoi3661
@yoihoiminoi3661 2 ай бұрын
@@turnip1744 I’m only talking about this specific debate. Here, both sides were relatively chill and didn’t resort to a screaming match
@danzel1157
@danzel1157 3 ай бұрын
"We weren't there, we didn't see these tree rings forming." I don't know whether to cry or laugh.
@sherneon
@sherneon 3 ай бұрын
It basically contradicts kens entire argument.
@f00kwhiteblackracismwarsh07
@f00kwhiteblackracismwarsh07 3 ай бұрын
you alght?
@howardfernandes2657
@howardfernandes2657 3 ай бұрын
Exactly 😂.
@SumriseHD
@SumriseHD Ай бұрын
What if the bible was written just 40 years ago? We didn't see the bible forming?
@danzel1157
@danzel1157 Ай бұрын
@@SumriseHD Brilliant. 🤣
@mediaproductionpro
@mediaproductionpro Жыл бұрын
Every few years I have to come back and rewatch this masterpiece. I only hope that everyone watching learns to think critically and question the motives and intentions behind the things they are taught.
@PurpleChevron
@PurpleChevron Жыл бұрын
"Masterpiece" is a pretty strong word for it in my opinion. But I agree with the rest of your comment.
@DodgerFloof
@DodgerFloof Жыл бұрын
That's kinda the point that science teaches you.
@Moriningland
@Moriningland 11 ай бұрын
I did and now I’m an atheist
@pwnzindaface
@pwnzindaface 11 ай бұрын
Which goes for both sides
@DatHombre
@DatHombre 11 ай бұрын
Yeah I fully agree, question everything your church has told you!
@davidjennings2300
@davidjennings2300 10 ай бұрын
Greatly enjoyed this debate because of how respectful the two were. For the most part, they kept the discussion on the topic at hand instead of letting it progress to an argument about the other person. Respect to both.
@davidjennings2300
@davidjennings2300 10 ай бұрын
@@wk8000 Well Christians believe in magic too. They call them miracles.
@aarongiroux5416
@aarongiroux5416 10 ай бұрын
​@@wk8000 if it's so easy to say God always existed why can't the universe have aways existed?
@dogsandyoga1743
@dogsandyoga1743 10 ай бұрын
​@@wk8000 If that's what you saw, that's what you saw. I personally saw a man who tried to, at least take seriously, a person making incredible claims, with very little information to demonstrate why such claims should be taken seriously.
@alliecourtney
@alliecourtney 9 ай бұрын
​@W K and what you believe in...isnt magic? You literally believe in a big invisible man who created everything out of nothingness. Your communion is a symbol of drinking blood, your prayers are nothing but a religious form of manifestation and spellcasting, and you blind yourself to the very obvious truths of our time. Science is observable, science is retestable, and science is reliable.
@noahc2078
@noahc2078 9 ай бұрын
​@@sltmdrtmtcWhy?
@athnealerodney9884
@athnealerodney9884 7 ай бұрын
As a matter of psychology, it is possible to be so entrenched in a belief, to the point where facts don't matter....
@TheAerosolNinja
@TheAerosolNinja 7 ай бұрын
That's Ken!
@floraaigbe3217
@floraaigbe3217 5 ай бұрын
What facts might you be referring to, the fact that finches were, are and will always be finches, that species variation or adaptation is not evolution or change of life forms? One would not change His mind because of stuff that’s been proven to be true and stands the test of time that historical facts and science has confirmed time and again. Can you really blame him? The other admits the fact that even the ground on which he stands is still being formed🤔
@HOTHEAD266
@HOTHEAD266 Ай бұрын
So u deceive your own self in the name of psychology
@zencrystal1383
@zencrystal1383 Ай бұрын
That can apply to bill, Ken or literally everyone in the world so that just means nothing
@RockyProductions360
@RockyProductions360 Ай бұрын
It is also a matter of psychology that one starts to believe what he considers to be a fact because it is taught so widely, when it is not fact, it is theory (such as the theory of evolution, or the big bang theory). I've never heard of the evolution fact or the big bang fact. So, just because we are taught these theories in school does not justify them as being fact as they are made out to be.
@MsRedbull99
@MsRedbull99 7 ай бұрын
It really is remarkable how civil and positive the large majority of comments are on this video
@rebeldragon1976
@rebeldragon1976 6 ай бұрын
I think it's because some people (on both sides) just want to argue and be "right" and there's no civility. They aren't really interested in intellectual conversation and debate. Most of us that will sit through a 2 hour video know how to be respectful to people we disagree with.
@berthascott4268
@berthascott4268 Ай бұрын
I am so thankful that I am a Christian who knows the truth about the Bible and God. In the Bible God tells us that he created the Earth in 6 days on the 7th he rested . God did not talk about science or the Big Bang theory. So until God comes down to earth and tells me then what he said was wrong about creating the earth, I'm going to believe him and not believe what the scientists tell me.
@UrYourLocalEldritchHorror
@UrYourLocalEldritchHorror 14 күн бұрын
​​​@@berthascott4268 Rather odd to completely disregard the years of work that scientists, geologists, zoologists, archeologists, and paleontologists Put in to tell us the facts of the world we live in For some ancient text that has been debunked numerous times
@starshipgus8578
@starshipgus8578 Жыл бұрын
If it was a political debate I wouldn’t have watched but 10 minutes of it,holding your ground and be respectful to one another is what civilized people do.Great debate.
@evolicious
@evolicious Жыл бұрын
wut. Ken isn't civilized, he's proposing everyone live in the dark ages.
@littlehollow
@littlehollow Жыл бұрын
@@evolicious he didn't convey anything like that at all lol, what are you on
@pageboy25
@pageboy25 Жыл бұрын
@@littlehollow He might has well have. His viewpoint is based around the ignorance of time and scientific based measurements and plain, outright, measurable evidence.
@DeniseEggertwaterlily
@DeniseEggertwaterlily 11 ай бұрын
@@evolicious The truth is that neither one of them has unequivable evidence to prove his view. The bone structures which were found in remote places during the last century were later found NOT to be of humanoid structure. Those who were proponents of human evolution were quick to label these pieces by human names. The skull which was labeled " Lucy" was later found to be of the Scientific name: Australopithecus afarensis or "southern ape." Every bone sample found in the last century and given a human name, was later discovered to be of animal origin. Most of these same species were later found to be in the more remote regions, decades later. It takes as much faith to believe in evolution as it does creationism. I found it more "dark ages", "cruel", and " repulsive" to know that some of the older evolutionists used their theory of evolution to advocate that "blacks were more primitive and less intelligent than whites." I also admit that the cruel torture and deaths done by the Inquisitions and other rejigious groups were due to the human ego to control others, instead of out of religious piety and charity.
@jimmiejones3997
@jimmiejones3997 11 ай бұрын
Ken Ham has true history within the word of God to back him up 👆 nye has not a leg to stand on with the theory of evolution that cannot be proven
@johnpetermann6544
@johnpetermann6544 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for holding this debate forum. America would be much better informed of our political candidates would hold debates with similar guidelines for give and take and question and answer periods instead of biased media moderators skewing the discussion or topic at hand.
@vincewidemann868
@vincewidemann868 Жыл бұрын
It’s alarming that we have candidates from a particular side of the aisle that run away from debates. They’re afraid of allowing voters to get a good look at what they stand for.
@PeerAdder
@PeerAdder 11 ай бұрын
Do you think this debate was (a) a contest to see who had the "better" arguments, (b) a joint search for true understanding, or (c) two people talking passed each other who will never reach a common understanding? (Hint, only one of these options is consistent with rational debate and critical thinking.)
@ege8240
@ege8240 11 ай бұрын
@@PeerAdder this was a debate between two people, one claiming they are right cause they are, other providing the evidence for their arguments.
@johnpetermann6544
@johnpetermann6544 11 ай бұрын
@@PeerAdder Peer, I appreciate open dialogue on a subject in question verses labeling and hyperbole that does not advance my understanding.
@vade137
@vade137 11 ай бұрын
The point s that Americans are not informed, but instead believe in ridiculous lies or are left so confused and frustrated that they just give up in frustration. Nye falls along the lines of the 'smooth liar'...he is no better than any politician who's role it is to leave you in confusion and frustration.
@jerryjonas8178
@jerryjonas8178 9 ай бұрын
What Mr. Nye speaks of happened to the Muslim faith in parts of the world ... they were a center of learning until conservative Muslims decided some things couldn't be discussed,,,
@GhostScout42
@GhostScout42 8 ай бұрын
Yes of it wasnt for ken ham, you would still have a kaliphate
@AJBayesta
@AJBayesta 19 сағат бұрын
I completely agree with you. If Christians were to go down Ken Ham’s route, we would end up in a similar situation to today’s fundamentalist Muslims. Some of the world’s greatest scientists were profoundly Christian, but capable of accepting empirical evidence.
@spooks188
@spooks188 9 ай бұрын
This makes the presidential debate look like an argument between two kindergardeners.
@213mug
@213mug 9 ай бұрын
Telling me, maybe we should send presidential candidates to the Creation Museum to take a class on how to have a mature grown-up conversation\debate while keeping your dignity.
@jehandesains8674
@jehandesains8674 9 ай бұрын
@@213mug how about we don't send people to the Creation Indoctrination Center and instead tear it down to the ground and replace it with something that has actual value to society?
@andreworders7305
@andreworders7305 18 күн бұрын
Two very jeriatric kindergartners
@mattc8831
@mattc8831 Жыл бұрын
These men are so respectful to each other and their views. I wish we had more of these debates regarding any topic in today’s soundbite ridden culture
@alexhuffvn
@alexhuffvn Жыл бұрын
Mr. Nye did a fairly decent job not letting his utter contempt for Mr. Ham show, but if you look into his eyes you can see it.
@ShangDi_became_Jesus
@ShangDi_became_Jesus Жыл бұрын
Im so mind blown with all that talent and genius all in one room.
@rossandtami0812
@rossandtami0812 Жыл бұрын
@@ShangDi_became_Jesus I am assuming you mean Nye's genius vs. Ham.
@breveth
@breveth Жыл бұрын
That's what debate is. If you think the presidential debates are actual debates, they aren't. They have become a mud-slinging event made to stir up controversy. Because controversy sells and most people watching have no idea what a debate is.
@shannaconda3434
@shannaconda3434 Жыл бұрын
@@rossandtami0812 The fact that you got nothing out of what Ken Ham was saying doesn't mean there was nothing there. Your contempt for what Ken Ham was saying and christianity in general will lead you to one of 2 ends. Either Ken is wrong and there's no harm no foul, or Nye is wrong and you're eternally damned! I would think that choice would at least make you curious of the other option.
@TheDanteVergil
@TheDanteVergil Жыл бұрын
The frustrating thing about these discussions is that the participants hardly answer each others questions. Thats something I would like to see
@eliasjakemoran6434
@eliasjakemoran6434 Жыл бұрын
Bill answered his questions though
@Destinyswarrior
@Destinyswarrior Жыл бұрын
Nye pretty much answered all his questions, Ham went with the typical Bible is truth rebuttle creationists always have.
@mrpadillaofficial
@mrpadillaofficial Жыл бұрын
@@eliasjakemoran6434 He also ignores the responses by Ken and keeps asking
@eliasjakemoran6434
@eliasjakemoran6434 Жыл бұрын
@@mrpadillaofficial Yeah, because Ken avoids some questions or gives piss poor answers
@mrpadillaofficial
@mrpadillaofficial Жыл бұрын
@@eliasjakemoran6434 One example. In minute 1:25:42 Ken Ham states “the laws of nature haven’t changed” Later in minute 1:32:18 Bill Nye says again that Ken Ham believes laws of nature have changed.
@justmylife94
@justmylife94 7 ай бұрын
I wasn't there when ancient romans built great roadways, but I can tell you through observation of many, many pieces of evidence how they did it. Whether or not you were present for something does not change whether or not you can determine how and if it happened. If Ham wants to keep leaning on that argument then he will never be able to claim religion as a matter of fact because he was not there for any of the story of the bible or before it.
@libertyordeath1211
@libertyordeath1211 5 ай бұрын
I watched this years ago. It was so good I am back for more.
@patrickgerona1
@patrickgerona1 5 жыл бұрын
Brings to mind..."It is really hard to win an argument against an intelligent person but impossible against a ignorant one"
@Phoenix_1776
@Phoenix_1776 Жыл бұрын
Fr, people like Ken Ham never acknowledge when they are beat
@feetyeet8538
@feetyeet8538 Жыл бұрын
@@Phoenix_1776 bruh, he was able to answer all the questions that bill nye couldn’t by using the Bible and logic. He didn’t lose
@racegroundbreaking82
@racegroundbreaking82 Жыл бұрын
@@feetyeet8538 "bible and logic" you can't put those words next to each other, no way.
@Phoenix_1776
@Phoenix_1776 Жыл бұрын
@@feetyeet8538 The Bible isn’t an accurate source of information when it comes to science. Actually, the fact that religious people claim it has all the answers further proves it’s lack of credibility
@feetyeet8538
@feetyeet8538 Жыл бұрын
@@Phoenix_1776 Let’s get this straight man. The Bible is about history, and there’s a reason why history and science aren’t the same thing. Can you use the scientific method to figure out that George Washington was the 1st president of the US? NO you know why? Because we can’t go back in time and observe his inauguration and talk to him and study his presidency. So according to “Science ” you can’t prove that he was the first president of US. But we obviously know that he was, so how do we know this? We know this because there were eyewitnesses that watched his inauguration and his presidency and those eyewitnesses wrote down those historical events so that now in the present we are able to read those historical documents and have proof that he actually was the first president. This is why it is important to understand the difference between science and history. Because of this the only way that you would have proof that the historical events of the Bible are true is if they’re were eyewitnesses that wrote down what they saw because as I’ve previously established (YOU CANT USE THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD ON HISTORY) And what do we have when we look at the Bible, exactly that. “THE BIBLE IS A RELIABLE COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS WRITTEN DOWN BY EYEWITNESSES DURING THE LIFETIME OF OTHER EYEWITNESSES. THEY REPORT TO US SUPERNATURAL EVENTS THAT TOOK PLACE IN FULFILLMENT OF SPECIFIC PROPHECIES AND CLAIM THAT THEIR WRITINGS ARE DIVINE RATHER THAN HUMAN IN ORIGIN.” This is why the Bible is true.
@jellynunez6123
@jellynunez6123 Жыл бұрын
Now, if we we can only get our politicians to debate in this civil manner. 😊
@anonymike8280
@anonymike8280 11 ай бұрын
They do. Behind the scenes. It's kinda like the car salesman. At home, he may be a great dad, a good neighbor and even a godly man. At work, he does what he has to do to keep his job.
@jeffanderson1708
@jeffanderson1708 10 ай бұрын
Too many people are swayed by the feeling that one candidate is stronger or more correct because they were louder, more aggressive or more dominant in a debate. (Not that most people haven't made up their mind by the time of the debate)
@3547cdr5
@3547cdr5 10 ай бұрын
@@jeffanderson1708 too many people are swayed because they see a 5 second clip on tiktok and then they fully support that one person
@jeffanderson1708
@jeffanderson1708 10 ай бұрын
@@3547cdr5 adorable.
@Mhats
@Mhats 9 ай бұрын
Idk I like when sleepy joe gets his talking points from his ear piece
@dvc9939
@dvc9939 8 ай бұрын
Mannnn the memories.. I remember being shown this debate by my science teacher who was a substitute the whole spring semester (freshmen Fairfield HS 2015).. the substitute is Chinese and I think he moved to China later at some point but… he was an incredible teacher. Always showed us films lolol. Great times! ❤❤
@g.g.7058
@g.g.7058 7 ай бұрын
Chinese spy causing dissent in the status quo
@ArthurTurner-bm1fn
@ArthurTurner-bm1fn 5 ай бұрын
What a brave and brilliant teacher to use a different culture to debate within that culture.
@bringerofmolochswrath5477
@bringerofmolochswrath5477 3 ай бұрын
Fairfield CT?
@elineitz2428
@elineitz2428 Ай бұрын
What’s ironic is that my Sunday school teacher showed this to us as well. Crazy how we can single out the things we like to hear.
@05grandmarquis
@05grandmarquis 3 ай бұрын
Very well structured debate and well done on both sides.
@benedictkhamisbona8360
@benedictkhamisbona8360 Жыл бұрын
The Debate is so interesting that you can not pause halfway. Great debate.
@evolicious
@evolicious Жыл бұрын
This wasn't a debate, it was an adult trying to teach a child basic science.
@HS-zk5nn
@HS-zk5nn Жыл бұрын
@@evolicious lol no one considers Bill Nye as someone who knows science
@thomasclark7254
@thomasclark7254 Жыл бұрын
@@HS-zk5nn he has more credibility than Ken Ham
@HS-zk5nn
@HS-zk5nn Жыл бұрын
@@thomasclark7254 I am sure you see it that way when one has a science degree and the other doesnt
@tfpnation6925
@tfpnation6925 Жыл бұрын
I just paused halfway in
@TheodenEdnewDoesDnD
@TheodenEdnewDoesDnD Жыл бұрын
I just remembered that I watched this livestream as it was live in class, in high school.
@ahjaeho
@ahjaeho Жыл бұрын
I did too. All the teachers were mad at Bill hahahahaha losers :)
@Light84736
@Light84736 Жыл бұрын
Dinosaurs were killed because of a catastrophic flood and the fossil record and the earth's geology proves this.
@KeithWaggoner-kb6ue
@KeithWaggoner-kb6ue Жыл бұрын
You must've been home schooled.
@Neeyooom
@Neeyooom 2 ай бұрын
I love how much of a teacher bill is. Before stating his opinion he explained/ gave a mini lesson on the theory of thermo dynamics
@pwells10
@pwells10 9 ай бұрын
One thing we can all agree on. Bill is not satisfied!
@AtheisticAtheist
@AtheisticAtheist 7 ай бұрын
Neither are the entire Academic world.
@johneaston6523
@johneaston6523 11 ай бұрын
Both men and the moderator put forth a respectful debate on a subject that is a bit concerning is even up for debate. "We can't use reason to persuade a person of a new position who did not use reason to establish their current position."
@thepotatoofheaven
@thepotatoofheaven 7 ай бұрын
when they say of a new position do they mean they cant change their view to a new position or someone who was in an old one and is now in a new one?
@boardingurban
@boardingurban Жыл бұрын
The fact that Answers in Genesis posted this is incredible. Thank you for your transparency
@Lionfellow
@Lionfellow 11 ай бұрын
What?
@miniclan68
@miniclan68 11 ай бұрын
@@Lionfellowhe means that Ken lost so posting this must’ve been tough
@DatHombre
@DatHombre 11 ай бұрын
@@miniclan68 yeah that does seem like what they meant lol- no idea why it would be "transparent" otherwise.
@jcmorgan26
@jcmorgan26 11 ай бұрын
@@miniclan68 no its as simple as it being transparent because they’re providing their viewers with both sides of the argument so people can decide on their own. Both schools of thought are equally valid as neither can be categorically proven without reasonable doubt, one due to unobservable timescales and one due to the need for an intelligent creator
@skepticalobserver7484
@skepticalobserver7484 11 ай бұрын
@@jcmorgan26 wow. Your post was a litany of logical fallacies.
@nimrodsfall3259
@nimrodsfall3259 Ай бұрын
I was 9 when this debate happened and I remember watching this live. Wow, time passes by fast.
@lvangirardi
@lvangirardi 7 ай бұрын
Ham's best argument is 'You weren't there' . Ridiculous
@zephyrus339
@zephyrus339 4 ай бұрын
I have it on good authority that Ham also wasn't there during the old testament.
@maxharvey165
@maxharvey165 4 ай бұрын
The best response to his whole argument is "how would you know, you weren't there either"
@zerotwo8245
@zerotwo8245 4 ай бұрын
Which is a fact. Nye claiming “vaccines are safe and effective” is a disgusting deliberate lie. I’ll stick with the truthful man, not the marxist Liar.
@radikalneko1187
@radikalneko1187 3 ай бұрын
i would rate his argument that counters every athiestic point with evidence as the best, just my opinion tho
@chrispalmer7893
@chrispalmer7893 3 ай бұрын
@@radikalneko1187 It's just your opinion that he has counter evidence, and it's difficult to support that opinion
@Compycryo
@Compycryo 10 ай бұрын
I'm surprised Bill mentioned the basalt sliding over the wood, instead of pointing out the different dating methods used. Ken mentioned that the rock was dated using potassium-argon dating (which is accurate from 4.3 billion years to 100k years in the past), while the wood was dated using radio carbon dating (dates ranging from approximately 50k years to 500 years in the past). This means the wood could easily have been as old as the basalt layer, but the dating method used was the wrong method for the necessary age range.
@jehandesains8674
@jehandesains8674 10 ай бұрын
Well, if the wood still contained C-14, that would be proof it's younger than 50.000 years, as carbon dating simply doesn't work if it no longer had that carbon.
@blnkdan
@blnkdan 10 ай бұрын
I’m not sure which came first, this debate or the tour of “The Ark” but Nye brought up different dating methods and every time Ham would dismiss it with false science or deflecting back onto how the the Bible was fact
@ManofManySorrows
@ManofManySorrows 10 ай бұрын
@@blnkdan Please list the false science you are claiming Ken Ham was bringing up.
@smoothdooth8784
@smoothdooth8784 10 ай бұрын
​@@ManofManySorrowseverything he said about anything having to do with science
@konstantink614
@konstantink614 10 ай бұрын
since basalt is an igneous rock, the wood would have burned comletely. The whole thing does not make any sense to me. I think he just pulled it out of his...
@worldsaway1002
@worldsaway1002 Жыл бұрын
This debate will age like fine wine 🍷
@leboiofbois1005
@leboiofbois1005 Жыл бұрын
Oh it has.
@axel-fh1ru
@axel-fh1ru Жыл бұрын
Why tho did God appears in the sky
@CobbleBompster
@CobbleBompster Жыл бұрын
@@axel-fh1ru 10/10 grammar
@axel-fh1ru
@axel-fh1ru Жыл бұрын
@@CobbleBompster English is my second language 💅
@CobbleBompster
@CobbleBompster Жыл бұрын
@@axel-fh1ru why did you put the 💅 emoji? 💀
@juliabatista6888
@juliabatista6888 9 ай бұрын
If only people now a days were this respectful instead of assaulting and yelling 😫
@ts-900
@ts-900 3 ай бұрын
I can't decide if Ham on Nye is better with or without pickles.
@asgoodasblank11
@asgoodasblank11 2 ай бұрын
You win
@krisbenson9674
@krisbenson9674 Жыл бұрын
I already commented but, wouldn't it be awesome if political debates could be respectful and decent human beings like these two to one another and to opposing views? would be a lot less problems and polarization if people respected each other and weren't threatened by each other and could argue with a live and let live mentality still.
@DemonBrandon
@DemonBrandon Жыл бұрын
True that!
@Easy1two3
@Easy1two3 Жыл бұрын
It's very difficult to take someone who thinks the earth is 6000 years old very seriously. The notion is on the same level as a flat earth in terms of ridiculousness.
@eriknorman7409
@eriknorman7409 Жыл бұрын
@@Easy1two3 It's hard to take anyone serious that believes the world is billions of years old....
@eriknorman7409
@eriknorman7409 Жыл бұрын
@@Easy1two3 Just like you guys believe in evolution, and we came from a big bang, then tadpole in a soup of water to a creature in water to crawl out to mammals to monkeys to humans....lmao
@Easy1two3
@Easy1two3 Жыл бұрын
@@eriknorman7409 that's what the evidence suggests. Sorry your world view doesn't align with the facts, but that's just the way it is.
@Call_Me_Trinity
@Call_Me_Trinity 9 ай бұрын
Thoroughly enjoyed this debate. Another really good one (for those interested) is Peter Atkins vs John Lennox. 😊
@si-fianimegirl6940
@si-fianimegirl6940 3 ай бұрын
Something I love about Nye debate, his debate wasn't even to argue with ken. It was to remind the audience that science isn't big scary false stuff, but is what is keeping us going better tomorrow. He wants people to help evolve us forward technology. To learn more to question more
@ThyBountyHunter
@ThyBountyHunter 3 ай бұрын
"big scary false stuff" Sorry exactly what do you mean and how?
@si-fianimegirl6940
@si-fianimegirl6940 3 ай бұрын
@@ThyBountyHunter I meant isn't big scary stuff as a lot of creationists do believe because it rebukes their logic
@ThyBountyHunter
@ThyBountyHunter 3 ай бұрын
@@si-fianimegirl6940 gotcha, thanks for that clarification, I know I sometimes type something different than what I am thinking.
@si-fianimegirl6940
@si-fianimegirl6940 3 ай бұрын
@@ThyBountyHunter I'm horrible at texting honestly so if you pint a mistake out im quick to say I'm sorry about my mistake! Thank for pointing it out! :)
@RicardoCray
@RicardoCray 2 ай бұрын
@@si-fianimegirl6940it doesn’t rebuke anything in fact it confirms a creator
@Archesuchus
@Archesuchus 9 ай бұрын
I wish Ken Ham would answer the questions instead of going behind a broad blanket statement or side-stepping the question altogether.
@cax1175
@cax1175 Ай бұрын
It's because he can't answer them
@user-sr5kr4dk1e
@user-sr5kr4dk1e 7 күн бұрын
I found just the opposite. Nye skirted 90% of the questions. I learned a lot about his family
@KristinaB-ek3od
@KristinaB-ek3od Жыл бұрын
“Beliefs about the past” are not necessarily the same as factual history.
@eliasjakemoran6434
@eliasjakemoran6434 Жыл бұрын
Exactly
@cajohnson130
@cajohnson130 21 күн бұрын
Same apply to the Bible?
@Zero-0-Cypher
@Zero-0-Cypher 11 ай бұрын
They always say "you weren't there,you didn't see it"...then how can they believe the bible...
@danialhillmann5374
@danialhillmann5374 10 ай бұрын
Well because God was there and told us to write down what happened
@michaelsears6702
@michaelsears6702 6 ай бұрын
@Zero-0-Cypher it’s not really hard to understand Ken’s argument. He says there are two types of science, “observational” and “historical”. Observational is what you observe in the present. We can see the Eiffel Tower. We know it is 1,083 because we can measure it and we can measure it because we can see it and touch it. Gustave Eiffel built the tower between 1887 and 1889. But, how do we know that? We weren’t alive in 1887. We weren’t there to see him build the tower, so how do we know if Gustave Eiffel was a real person and if he build the tower of Eiffel? Well, his grave is one thing that tells us he was an actual person. Why? Because we can observe (see and touch) his grave stone. And also there are books (historical science) that tell us about him and tell us he built the Eiffel Tower. That is the difference between Observation and Historical science and that is what Ken Ham is saying.
@gabrielgamez2033
@gabrielgamez2033 6 ай бұрын
You can believe the Bible because the death burial and Resurrection of Jesus Christ has been historically proven. Not even Academia argues whehter Jesus was fake because there is proof. What it comes down to is do you believe what Jesus Christ said about Himself being the Son of God and the Savior of the world from their sins. That He alone is the Way, the Truth, and the Life and that only through Him can you everlasting life if you believe in Him
@-TheUnkownUser
@-TheUnkownUser 6 ай бұрын
@@michaelsears6702 And you are so confused that it's not a misunderstandig of the argument. Is that his argument still doesn't make sense.
@-TheUnkownUser
@-TheUnkownUser 6 ай бұрын
@@gabrielgamez2033 There is zero evidence of Jesus resurrection. The bible is full of historical inaccuracies...
@rileybarker1449
@rileybarker1449 4 ай бұрын
The amount of times sir hamm says “think about it” is wild
@M3GASQUID
@M3GASQUID 3 ай бұрын
translation: "Don't think about it"
@gageduke7652
@gageduke7652 2 ай бұрын
@@M3GASQUID Or "Think about it enough to convince yourself that it is true" (self-indoctrination).
@M3GASQUID
@M3GASQUID 2 ай бұрын
@@gageduke7652 translation: "memorize this but don't think about it" lol
@chuanne2
@chuanne2 7 ай бұрын
I always look to mechanical engineers for expertise on creation.
@ayeeeitskev
@ayeeeitskev 4 ай бұрын
hes not an expert on creation lol, you cant be an expert in something that doesnt exist
@cax1175
@cax1175 Ай бұрын
You go to a book written thousands of years ago translated dozens of times for your expertise, so which is more outlandish? Bill Nye isn't the expert, he is simply a messenger here with the information of things tested and proven.
@eyevan7100
@eyevan7100 Ай бұрын
​@@ayeeeitskevsorry, did you just say creation doesn't exist 💀?
@ayeeeitskev
@ayeeeitskev Ай бұрын
@@eyevan7100 creation as represented in the bible does not exist. well done, you can read…
@eyevan7100
@eyevan7100 Ай бұрын
@@ayeeeitskev Oh look you managed to be wrong twice
@calebowls4191
@calebowls4191 Жыл бұрын
Interesting debate, well done.
@M-Y-T
@M-Y-T Жыл бұрын
This was a very useful source for my debate paper, thank you!
@KeithWaggoner-kb6ue
@KeithWaggoner-kb6ue Жыл бұрын
Maybe you should read the Lincoln/Douglas debate. Nye/Ham was a show, like pro wrestling with Nye as the Heel.
@Johnsmith-hp6tw
@Johnsmith-hp6tw Жыл бұрын
Nothing was debated. Nye stated facts and ham lied, as always.
@M-Y-T
@M-Y-T Жыл бұрын
@@Johnsmith-hp6tw Nein, they both had compelling arguments.
@Johnsmith-hp6tw
@Johnsmith-hp6tw Жыл бұрын
@@M-Y-T "arguments" are irrelevant. Facts matter. Evolution is a fact. No debate exists.
@davidhoward5687
@davidhoward5687 Жыл бұрын
@@Johnsmith-hp6tw Nye stated hypothesis, not facts. Facts are proven, nothing about evolution has been proven...
@YouthfulCrusader
@YouthfulCrusader 9 ай бұрын
25:20 I LOVE how confused and zoned out the crowd is 🤣🤣🤣
@paolacarmichael611
@paolacarmichael611 4 ай бұрын
They all look so concerned with what he's trying to claim 😭
@RisenGlory89
@RisenGlory89 Ай бұрын
Looks like they're just listening to me but I guess bias can be a powerful thing.
@salmonofknowledge3229
@salmonofknowledge3229 3 ай бұрын
Yep, we're using ad block for this one.
@Rico-Suave_
@Rico-Suave_ Жыл бұрын
Best debate ever, watched all of it, I think I watched it two times before
@teknoaija1762
@teknoaija1762 Жыл бұрын
Me too and Ken Ham is just as ridiculous and comical in his stupidity every time.
@jeremykoerperich4779
@jeremykoerperich4779 Жыл бұрын
@@teknoaija1762 yep he looked so bad in this debate. Did you see when they went through the Ark Encounter together? Here’s a spoiler the only thing Ken is worried about is how nice they did building it and Bill Nye was concerned with all the fake science and lies that building is full of.
@joelcarter2535
@joelcarter2535 Жыл бұрын
@@teknoaija1762 wow your just lovely to talk to I bet
@adoniplaitis4765
@adoniplaitis4765 Жыл бұрын
​@@joelcarter2535😂💯
@joelcarter2535
@joelcarter2535 Жыл бұрын
@@adoniplaitis4765 😄
@bootsj7662
@bootsj7662 11 ай бұрын
Why can’t people debate like this anymore? Both so well spoken, well done great listen
@jn2400
@jn2400 11 ай бұрын
Should of been done over covid.
@jeffanderson1708
@jeffanderson1708 10 ай бұрын
Too many people are swayed by the feeling that one candidate is stronger or more correct because they were louder, more aggressive or more dominant in a debate. (Not that most people haven't made up their mind by the time of the debate)
@efrainandino7300
@efrainandino7300 10 ай бұрын
Truly what it’s all about. The respect and professionalism was far out! Nice debate
@ryanbell6672
@ryanbell6672 10 ай бұрын
people debate like this daily across the world... just not posted on youtube
@Tempe415
@Tempe415 10 ай бұрын
we used to have debates like this before the 21st century now it's "annoy them" strategies
@liamcosradtheta
@liamcosradtheta 6 ай бұрын
I respect the both of them as they both engaged in a very informative and respective conversation
@lennardchurch8483
@lennardchurch8483 6 ай бұрын
If you watch the rest of the videos Bill Nye has made over the last several years, you'll see that he is not a respectful person, and that he's peddling ideologies and faux-science that have no basis in actual fact-based science.
@ThyBountyHunter
@ThyBountyHunter 6 ай бұрын
@@lennardchurch8483 Respectful is a subjective term, if someone just says something against what you believe even in the nicest manner you could say that it was disrespectful. So your opinion holds no value or weight, after all your comment about him was disrespectful and given we should question people who are, you literally just gave us a counter to your point. Was Bill wrong in the debate, Yes or No? If Yes prove it, if No then end of argument. Ken Ham has bilked 50 million out of people on a subject he is not qualified to talk about. Kens god is $$$. That is not an opinion but fact.
@rolan.r
@rolan.r 6 ай бұрын
​@@ThyBountyHunter🤓
@hannahcolors
@hannahcolors 8 ай бұрын
And here we are almost 10 years later! This conversation would be considered extremely controversial. That's a drastic change would you say? Food for thought.
@billycool6237
@billycool6237 5 ай бұрын
@@PhilipK635 500 years ago evolution wasnt even on the table.
@alkaline8608
@alkaline8608 21 күн бұрын
@@billycool6237 amazing how evidence changes our understanding right.
@ThisRedRocks
@ThisRedRocks Жыл бұрын
This is an interesting debate to watch today and I’m sure will be even more interesting to watch 5 years from now and further
@allikatomalley6121
@allikatomalley6121 Жыл бұрын
I watch it every few years. One of the greatest debates I've ever heard
@sandorrabe5745
@sandorrabe5745 Жыл бұрын
Yes it becomes more and more relevant. I must admit only 18 months ago or so my perspective was completely different than it is now. I love you Jezus! 🙏💟
@andrewsimms4904
@andrewsimms4904 Жыл бұрын
I’m in the same boat, the 9 years of ‘progress’ since this debate really undermine one of these arguments.
@mattsell2361
@mattsell2361 11 ай бұрын
@@andrewsimms4904just curious which one do u say it undermines?
@ege8240
@ege8240 11 ай бұрын
@@andrewsimms4904 not really, dont know what you are trying to hint at with 'progress'. please your serial produced argument in further detail to have an actual discussion, as we are not in the circlejerk you seem familiar to be in.
@ayyitslola8322
@ayyitslola8322 10 ай бұрын
Such a great debate. Everyone should watch this
@scottsage3024
@scottsage3024 9 ай бұрын
Ken got smoked. All feelings and little factual information
@noahc2078
@noahc2078 9 ай бұрын
@@sltmdrtmtc Yes, Ken Ham is a scientist trying to explain basic science, and Bill Nye is a lying religious fanatic. Your reply is ridiculously arbitrary! For one, Bill Nye is not a scientist, he's an engineer, whereas Ken Ham has a bachelor's degree in applied science (with an emphasis on environmental biology). Define "religious fanatic". Better yet, define "religion", because "evolutionism", having to do with the origin of the world and humanity's ultimate authority (albeit ourselves), is in fact a religion.
@noahc2078
@noahc2078 9 ай бұрын
@@scottsage3024 You just described your reply.
@JR-yd5pf
@JR-yd5pf 8 ай бұрын
@@noahc2078 Engineering IS an applied science, genius. Your own definitions contradict each other 😂😂 By all metrics, creationism is a braindead way to interpret our world. Cope with it.
@noahc2078
@noahc2078 8 ай бұрын
@@JR-yd5pf What I mean to say is engineering is not a branch of BIOLOGY, which is primarily the center of the creation/evolution debate. By all metrics, evolution is a braindead way to interpret our world, cope with it. SEE, you're not the ONLY one who can be snide and demeaning while also proving NOTHING AT ALL, so try something else why dontcha.
@natalieyam1494
@natalieyam1494 8 ай бұрын
Watching this 9 years since the live debate, I found this extremely compelling and thought provoking. Although I do have to note that Ham's beliefs seem to originate from his faith and it was obvious that nothing could change his mind. Is having such a fixed mindset and rooting your entire worldview on something that is not and cannot be proven and have insufficient evidence for really a good thing? He constantly used the Bible as "evidence", basically using God to prove God. I would also like to point out that the Bible would usually be considered to be false and inaccurate by the non-believer which was who he was arguing.
@SandersClan
@SandersClan 8 ай бұрын
So you agree that the Bible is God breathed? Otherwise Ken Ham is just using a historical account, barely different than any other first hand accounts.
@MayLNg
@MayLNg 8 ай бұрын
@@SandersClan Ken Ham is clueless about actual history; he is an expert liar only.
@timothystill9192
@timothystill9192 8 ай бұрын
The bible is entirely true so ham should have leaned on that more.
@PoisonedWraith
@PoisonedWraith 3 ай бұрын
I think it's fine for him to lean on his faith and belief in the Bible, but he needs more than just that. Jesus didn't use the Bible when he reached out to non-believers. If you're going to debate, then you require more than something people will choose to ignore.
@jounisuninen
@jounisuninen 3 ай бұрын
"...rooting your entire worldview on something that is not and cannot be proven ..." Like atheists rooting their entire worldview on abiogenesis and evolution while abiogenesis would be against the laws of physics, and empirical tests have proved that "evolution" is just intraspecific adaptive variation which never leads to a new taxonomic genus or family.
@IAEMThatIAEM
@IAEMThatIAEM 5 ай бұрын
I'm so glad this guy decided to start debating the second that Christopher Hitchens turned out to be dead
@alphasushi9178
@alphasushi9178 11 ай бұрын
I just love that bill nye looks like Abraham Lincoln
@davidandthatotherguy1369
@davidandthatotherguy1369 11 ай бұрын
Untrue.
@PapperPo
@PapperPo 11 ай бұрын
@@davidandthatotherguy1369they’re right
@Antiorganizer
@Antiorganizer Жыл бұрын
Just because someone came up with an idea that turned out to be a life changing invention, does not mean that whatever else that person claims, automatically becomes a truth.
@cristianbenites4521
@cristianbenites4521 Жыл бұрын
That also applies to people who claimed to see/hear God and invented a spiritual explanation to the world. You shouldn't rely on them either!!
@quantom1827
@quantom1827 Жыл бұрын
He was just saying, that scientists who believe in Biblical creationism can still be scientists, they don't have to be atheists and their work isn't less credible than the atheists work.
@Antiorganizer
@Antiorganizer Жыл бұрын
​@@quantom1827 When the claims that the bible makes aren't scientific, the notion of a biblical creationist scientist is an oxymoron.
@technicianbis5250
@technicianbis5250 Жыл бұрын
@@cristianbenites4521 "that also ecplains" God created us, we didn't create God. Schools, universities, hospitals, laws all came from Christian backgrounds. Without Christians mankind would still be contemplating his navel.
@technicianbis5250
@technicianbis5250 Жыл бұрын
@@Antiorganizer Which claims does the Bible make that aren't scientific?
@chriskrahn
@chriskrahn 22 күн бұрын
Im happy they didn’t disable the comments.
@ThyBountyHunter
@ThyBountyHunter 21 күн бұрын
For The first 8 or so years it was off.
@BacJaw
@BacJaw 28 күн бұрын
If you are having trouble spotting fallacies in debates, watch more Ken Ham videos.
@speedygonsales1043
@speedygonsales1043 9 ай бұрын
“You weren’t there” Bet *hops on the time machine*
@Danknight-bp7wh
@Danknight-bp7wh 9 ай бұрын
avengers: endgame
@michaelsears6702
@michaelsears6702 6 ай бұрын
That is hilarious
@mnmnrt
@mnmnrt Ай бұрын
ken ham unironically claiming that the universe was created this instant
@thecharctank
@thecharctank 11 ай бұрын
Bill Nye is really trying to control himself from bursting into laughter when he is talking about Ham's vegetarian lion
@lukeedison1632
@lukeedison1632 11 ай бұрын
Why? Ken Ham gave tangible examples of bears and bats with large, sharp, fangs and teeth seemingly implying a carnivore - and yet they eat plants. How is that funny?
@thecharctank
@thecharctank 11 ай бұрын
​@@lukeedison1632 They are not tangible examples because Ken Ham is trying to change the order of the natural world to fit into his narrative - the bible. It just does not work because he has no evidence - his evidence is "because the bible says so". There never were herbivore lions. Lions are apex predators and members of the cat family, which are obligate carnivores. This means that their bodies are adapted to digesting and deriving nutrients from meat, and they have not evolved the specialized digestive systems necessary for breaking down plant matter. Each species that you mention has evolved in a particular way and hence they have a particular diet. Because of their diet, they will have a set of teeth that assist with their diet. For example, Pandas do have sharp"ish" incisors and flat wide molars and are predominantly herbivores. The reason they have sharp incisors is to help break through the hard outer part of the bamboo. Their teeth and jaw have evolved for them to be able to eat that diet. Same with the bats. BTW, most bats eat insects and small rodents/ animals. The three species that eat fruit have flatter teeth. So no, Mr Ham has absolutely no evidence to change his belief into the fact that lions were ever herbivores!
@zachrowe6271
@zachrowe6271 11 ай бұрын
​@@lukeedison1632 Bears are omnivores and they have the proper teeth. Lions not so much!
@vanillagorilla2747
@vanillagorilla2747 11 ай бұрын
@@lukeedison1632 Bears aren’t only carnivores though it’s evident in the structure of their teeth specifically their molars. Lions however have teeth more suited for biting into prey and their molars are pointed
@vanillagorilla2747
@vanillagorilla2747 11 ай бұрын
@@zachrowe6271 Nvm I searched it up and they don’t even contain molars for digesting plant material
@cupcakesneedlove2
@cupcakesneedlove2 8 ай бұрын
First time watching this and I’m excited
@dakotacarney9732
@dakotacarney9732 5 ай бұрын
These guys could be a wonderful pair of they worked together on a project even if they don't see eye to eye
@andreworders7305
@andreworders7305 18 күн бұрын
there’s probably a Robot Chicken sketch or something along those line
@ninecowsh9228
@ninecowsh9228 11 ай бұрын
1:17:00 yes - there’s a problem. Your “geologist” sent wood to C14 dating and got approximately the max age that C14 dating can be used for. That’s like me getting on the kitchen scale and concluding that my mass is only 5 kg because the scale maxes out at 5 kg 😂
@ninecowsh9228
@ninecowsh9228 11 ай бұрын
And the St Helens lava is sort of the opposite I believe. Here you’re asking how old something very new is with a method designed for something much older. That’s like me using my bathroom scale to weigh of ingredients to make 0.5 kg of cake.
@davidandthatotherguy1369
@davidandthatotherguy1369 11 ай бұрын
How do you know that the grand canyon is millions of years old?
@ninecowsh9228
@ninecowsh9228 11 ай бұрын
@@davidandthatotherguy1369 because I read more than one book
@davidandthatotherguy1369
@davidandthatotherguy1369 11 ай бұрын
​@@ninecowsh9228 I read more than one book to.
@ninecowsh9228
@ninecowsh9228 11 ай бұрын
@@davidandthatotherguy1369 Several independent methods all based on the laws of nature points towards an earth that is roughly 4.5 billion years old I’m inclined to believe that. Plus that a lot of laws of nature should be broken in order to make it only 6000 years old. Only one book claims that it’s 6000 years old and it was written when people also strongly believed the earth was flat.
@joeventura6287
@joeventura6287 7 ай бұрын
Bill Nye could play Dr. Who next season...
@andreworders7305
@andreworders7305 18 күн бұрын
Pretty sure that could be considered a declaration of war against the British
@PNolandS
@PNolandS 9 ай бұрын
1:42:04 Ok, yeah, that was a pretty good joke. That aside, I almost wish Nye could have made a rebuttal to Ham's rebuttal (and then Ham a rebuttal to THAT rebuttal) so that he could ask Mr. Ham how the idea of a god creating the universe from nothing points more to Mr. Ham's cause of promoting a creationist world view, as opposed to the world view held by most Christians that the story of Genesis is not to be taken literally and that God must have just been the one to cause/create the big bang (and therefore kicking off the universe as we know it). In my opinion Mr. Ham's response here falls short because it merely points towards the explanation of "We know where the substance of the universe came from; God", which is the same argument most Christians would probably give as well. This however is an argument for god, not an argument that (as most Christians or other people would believe) points towards the literal interpretation Genesis. Of course, Nye comes at this from a much more scientific standpoint and not one of religion, so it is of course more than likely that Ham in his 1 minute did not have time to expand on this and just had to (at the very least) explain the absolute core of his response that (when made so short and simple) lines up with the same world view of other Christians. I just would've liked to see him expand upon this further. P.S. Haven't finished watching this yet, so perhaps it will be expanded on later.
@obedmccalip9449
@obedmccalip9449 10 ай бұрын
Complete opposite sides, subjects hot topics at work, yet both give their respective views in a calm, professional, productive manner without resulting to low blows. Leaders, it can be done.
@jeromeyoung4782
@jeromeyoung4782 10 ай бұрын
I was to watch just the first 2 minutes, i ended up watching the entire thing! 2 well spoken men, keep the time and are incredibly respectful. Brilliant!😊
@05grandmarquis
@05grandmarquis 3 ай бұрын
You saw a 2 & half hour video and thought hmm ill just watch 2 minutes
@HarryNicNicholas
@HarryNicNicholas 2 ай бұрын
ken isn't respectable though, basically people like ken will support god in any immorality he wants to undertake, god kills everyone on the planet, ken is backing him all the way - it's sick.
@lilietafinn1041
@lilietafinn1041 9 ай бұрын
Great debate
@jerryjonas8178
@jerryjonas8178 9 ай бұрын
What does John 3:16 have to do with creation?
@Nick-gs2mw
@Nick-gs2mw 10 ай бұрын
I agree with everyone else when it comes to how respectful they were to each other. And kudos to most people that commented. For the most part we're being respectful to each other. We need this in the United States. For the people that like debate, for the people that like to see both sides of a story, for the people that are being respectful to each other! Vote! Please vote! No matter your party affiliation. We need critical thinkers to vote.
@user-jq7cp6rz4d
@user-jq7cp6rz4d 9 ай бұрын
Great words Nick. Respect and curiosity. I'll put my"Faith" in that. We must participate to have a real place in this world. Does anyone remember - Oh people look around. The signs are everywhere. You've left it to somebody other than you, to be the one to care---
@BelfastManUtdTherapyReactions
@BelfastManUtdTherapyReactions 4 ай бұрын
hey man peace and love to you and everyone else. I actually disagree though, because whoever gets voted in, ALWAYS messes up and pursues selfish agendas. If people in society get f**ked over its the voters who are to blame for voting them in. Im Irish but it seems to me that USA politics is either democrat or republican, well off money-wise so its almost a no lose endeavor. America needs freshend up politically and I think someone who takes values of both sides need represented as a 'middle' party, i need a better word but you know what i mean, anyway just a thought :)
@shannaconda3434
@shannaconda3434 Жыл бұрын
The dynamic of this debate gets.more intense as it wears on and it almost seems like the podiums get closer in the process. I know that's not happening it's just amazing how the intensity of adversity makes it seem that way.
@klouse7643
@klouse7643 29 күн бұрын
I don’t understand how someone can grasp the concept of different species of finches coming from a common ancestor… but then forget about ALL of the evolution that happened before that
@dingers5days
@dingers5days 9 ай бұрын
1:49:52 Ham’s and Nye’s answers are a microcosm of the entire “religion vs science” debate
@noahc2078
@noahc2078 8 ай бұрын
The entirety of Bill Nye's answer was a strawman. For one, what creationist said the stars aren't far away? For two, as for the fossil that swam from one layer to another, that much water would have almost instantaneously crushed everything. For three, creationists do not deny that the universe is expanding, but judging by the rate at which, for instance, the moon spirals away from the earth... Let's see. The moon is 384,400 kilometers away from the earth, and spirals away at a rate of 3.7 centimeters per year. Evolutionists say that the moon came into existence 4.5 billion years ago, but judging by the rate at which the moon leaves us, it would have been 217,900 kilometers away from the earth at the time, not too much less than half it's distance today, meaning the speed at which it revolves today couldn't have possibly stopped it from falling onto the earth, and the moon wasn't going faster than it is now, because we know it wouldn't have slowed down, with there being no medium, and hence, no wind resistance in space. However, if we follow this rate backwards 6,000 years, the moon would have been 383,997.79 kilometers away from the Earth. Not much of anything will have changed.
@jehandesains8674
@jehandesains8674 8 ай бұрын
@@noahc2078 you forget about gravity. Gravity is the force that slowed both Earth and the Moon down, and the rate of our moon's spiralling is decreasing. What creationists did, is take a specific point of data that fitted their narrative and denied all other data that proves them wrong, because it didn't fit their narrative. Remember: you can prove anything and everything if you deny everything that goes against your story.
@billycool6237
@billycool6237 5 ай бұрын
@@noahc2078 finally someone with actual logic in the comments
@loverofhummus1029
@loverofhummus1029 2 ай бұрын
@@noahc2078wow. google would disprove EVERYTHING you just claimed. do some basic research on google scholar
@hicx8734
@hicx8734 10 ай бұрын
This turned out to be one of the most historic debates ever recorded😂
@Jay-ft3xh
@Jay-ft3xh 9 ай бұрын
For humor, yes. Most humans have transgressed such bigoted doctrines.
@SheepDog1974
@SheepDog1974 6 ай бұрын
Most won't get it
@jamespitts10
@jamespitts10 4 ай бұрын
@@Jay-ft3xh if you’re a naturalist/materialist at all, you don’t have a place to speak philosophically. Your worldview runs into so many philosophical absurdities it’s baffling.
@shivsticker9680
@shivsticker9680 3 ай бұрын
Recommend checking out the debate of Hitchens and Stephen Fry at the Vatican. "Is the Catholic Church a Force For Good"
@gageduke7652
@gageduke7652 2 ай бұрын
@@jamespitts10 Such as?
@domsnow6418
@domsnow6418 8 ай бұрын
If there were 14000 animals on that ship, what did they do with all the poop?
@mohamedfares4316
@mohamedfares4316 8 ай бұрын
threw it in the water? duh.
@ArtemisFowl_the_wise
@ArtemisFowl_the_wise 2 ай бұрын
@@mohamedfares4316and it became AnkhMorpork
@togo5606
@togo5606 25 күн бұрын
In most recent times how did they fit 600 slaves and 100 crew on small sailing vessels- some were 80 feet long while ark estimated 500 ft. How was that done. Think about how they sail a ship for 40-60 days in the ocean and feed, use bathrooms etc. unbelievable challenge that was and it was done for year after year. How did they make those pyramids, Stonehenge ? Some facts appear unfathomable when you consider the details- yet it still happened! Just like the details of a developing baby unfathomable, year after year- how does this sperm egg thing develop bones and flesh-explain that genesis. Still happens.
@ZK_SHREDR
@ZK_SHREDR 5 ай бұрын
For some reason I thought Bill nye had died. After watching this ,I had the shock of my life finding out he was still alive😂my own little Mandela effect. Good to hear him again tho. My vegan tiger wasn't happy tho
@BallersLife3
@BallersLife3 4 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@adamsech
@adamsech Ай бұрын
Nope, Bill Nye was in Denver Dec 6, 2023.
@dynamicchecklists127
@dynamicchecklists127 10 ай бұрын
"The battle is really about authority". Yes, indeed, it is.
@ruidacosta8432
@ruidacosta8432 9 ай бұрын
One shows his authority with humility and the other through arrogance.
@ishwarlxm6333
@ishwarlxm6333 Жыл бұрын
This video is awesome
@whoknow9688
@whoknow9688 5 ай бұрын
The more I know, the more I know that I am not know enough.
@wyattspangler2683
@wyattspangler2683 3 ай бұрын
It’s a rite of passage to watch this debate
@10Bones01
@10Bones01 Жыл бұрын
This is how gentlemen debate.
@bluskie605
@bluskie605 Жыл бұрын
The Bible's account of morality is something that stands for itself. Rather than believing in something that other people say, which you can or cannot prove to yourself. Morality is something that you can prove to yourself in your daily life, about what is true or not.
@cassie2025
@cassie2025 11 ай бұрын
Ah yes. Morality in the bible. Slavery isn't outlawed or condemned, women are ordered to marry their rapists, and kill your kid if the voices in your head (God) tell you too. I love how moral the Bible is and that is why I didn't fall away years ago and continue to practice the above in my everyday life /s
@GriffinK10
@GriffinK10 10 ай бұрын
@@cassie2025 yeah was blue skie arguing for or against the Bible lol
@ThyBountyHunter
@ThyBountyHunter 2 ай бұрын
@Tickbeat Instead of deleting a comment string where you made a mistake you could have just admitted you failed to read the description.
@harrisonhonda3745
@harrisonhonda3745 9 ай бұрын
I was a Christian until I read the Bible, and said hang on, read it again, and again, and again, wrote down my questions and went to my elder and got the classic: God works in mysterious ways
@MayLNg
@MayLNg 8 ай бұрын
It is called "mysterious" because nobody can provide any evidence for a god.
@harrisonhonda3745
@harrisonhonda3745 8 ай бұрын
@@MayLNg I know, because the evidence for a Christian god is zero, it doesn’t exist at all, the whole thing is stolen from every other religion. The holy bible can’t even keep its story straight before the next page says a different thing.
@bikesrcool_1958
@bikesrcool_1958 8 ай бұрын
@@MayLNgactually God is a perfectly normal and rational conclusion with sufficient evidence. Your house is 100 percent evidence of a builder. Your phone is 100 percent evidence of a designer. The irrational view actually, is no creator of any sort.
@MayLNg
@MayLNg 8 ай бұрын
@@bikesrcool_1958 You are employing false and deceptive logic. You do not have a single evidence for any "creation" or for any "creator". Can you list one (evidence) and how would we test that "evidence" to show creation or your god?.
@bikesrcool_1958
@bikesrcool_1958 8 ай бұрын
@@MayLNg deceptive logic? I’m using rational logic. Please tell me that your house had designers and builders
@davidtalkington7975
@davidtalkington7975 11 ай бұрын
I love the ice layer thing. If you go to Cleveland Ohio in the winter or anywhere else for that matter where snow falls, you will see that if you dig in an area untouched by anyone for about 1 month that there are about 15 to 20 layers, all separated by a thin layer of dirt and other particles carried by the wind that coats the top of the snow in between snowfalls. Each being crushed by the weight of the previous snowfall.
@3DGamer2B
@3DGamer2B 11 ай бұрын
How long do it take those layers to form?
@frogsnack7072
@frogsnack7072 10 ай бұрын
That's exactly what I was thinking. It reminded me of a recent 'discovery' of walking rocks in the Arizona desert, that actually turned out to be rocks getting scooted every winter on thin sheets of ice that melted quickly. If someone unaware of the time the ice was there assumed that each 'walk' of a rock (there were wavy patterns in it) was a year and not a single night, the 'date' of the rocks walking or whatever would be off astronomically. We don't know anything until we can actually observe it. The tree rings, too, made me wonder if there aren't extra rings from years that had hard refreezes, making it look like multiple years when cut.
@catherinerosner970
@catherinerosner970 10 ай бұрын
You are simplifying what layers means. It is not how many times it snows providing layers but rather yearly totals. Bill explains this to Ken on his ark tour.
@davidtalkington7975
@davidtalkington7975 10 ай бұрын
@@catherinerosner970 So are you saying that simple answers are not truth, and that only complicated one's are?
@frogsnack7072
@frogsnack7072 10 ай бұрын
@@catherinerosner970 It is ASSUMED yearly totals. Once again, there is assumptions that it is based on, not observations.
@isiahromero1353
@isiahromero1353 11 ай бұрын
Nice debate was entertaining. I learned a lot from both sides. Well done gentlemen👏
@dieterleonard2309
@dieterleonard2309 10 ай бұрын
What do you learned from Ken Ham's BS?
@andyhug90
@andyhug90 10 ай бұрын
@@dieterleonard2309 dude the people here saying this was a great debate infuriate me, he literally has no point except "the bible says so"
@ROFLVH
@ROFLVH 10 ай бұрын
⁠@@andyhug90 maybe when you grow up, debates that challenge your worldview won’t “infuriate” you.
@dieterleonard2309
@dieterleonard2309 10 ай бұрын
@@ROFLVH But the stupidity of Ken Hams “arguments” is hard to digest…
@ROFLVH
@ROFLVH 10 ай бұрын
@@dieterleonard2309 “the guy I liked won! The guy I didn’t like is stupid!”- Dieter Leonard
@GodKing804
@GodKing804 3 ай бұрын
Imagine needing so much drama for a long forum podcast
@ronswanson2345
@ronswanson2345 7 ай бұрын
The level of cognitive dissonance is truly remarkable
@basstheory9384
@basstheory9384 7 ай бұрын
Indeed
@Goujiki
@Goujiki 3 ай бұрын
Abiogenesis still has not been proven in a non-controlled environment (early earth) yet most scientists will deny this lack of evidence. The probability of life forming spontaneously would require billions of multi-verses.
@purelyrandom1230
@purelyrandom1230 2 ай бұрын
Bill indeed
@LuisRodriguez-yi1bu
@LuisRodriguez-yi1bu 2 ай бұрын
Indeed
@isiahromero1353
@isiahromero1353 Ай бұрын
​@@purelyrandom1230ken ham indeed, did you even watch the debate you goof.
@dogsandyoga1743
@dogsandyoga1743 10 ай бұрын
I'd love to see a debate between scientists, especially the creation scientists. Because as objective and open as I tried to be watching this, there was virtually nothing Mr. Ham said that was even remotely compelling.
@2fast2block
@2fast2block 10 ай бұрын
"especially the creation scientists" and "there was virtually nothing Mr. Ham said that was even remotely compelling." Ham believes we got CREATION by supernatural means and Nye by natural means. To your tiny brain though, Ham is wrong. So show that or admit you don't think much. Certainly you're aware of creationist don't believe in a natural creation. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally at some point yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.
@noahc2078
@noahc2078 9 ай бұрын
That's YOUR fault.
@dogsandyoga1743
@dogsandyoga1743 9 ай бұрын
@@noahc2078 Um...my fault for what? Not being impressed with terrible arguments? Clearly there ARE creation scientists, I'd love to see a debate with them.
@noahc2078
@noahc2078 9 ай бұрын
@@dogsandyoga1743 Bill Nye isn't even a scientist, and his arguments were pretty much a really long version of what's called the question begging epithet, where he basically gave is evidence immediately acted like it was indisputable, whereas Ken started by leveling the playing field with the assertion that creationists and evolutionists see the SAME evidence in different lights. Bill Nye basically excused it all. Ken's arguments were far more compelling.
@johnnkurunziza5012
@johnnkurunziza5012 8 ай бұрын
That’s perfectly fine
@HouseOfFaust
@HouseOfFaust Жыл бұрын
I know Im late to the party but most bears are omnivorous, not vegetarian. There is a massive difference. Sure the black bear is more into veggies than meat but they are definitely down for a steak my guy.
@theviolater9231
@theviolater9231 Жыл бұрын
Polars bears most of the time are straight up Carnivores
@HouseOfFaust
@HouseOfFaust Жыл бұрын
@@theviolater9231 tbf that's almost definitely just because of where they live. You can actually track polar bear eating habits based on how far away from their natural habitat they are but that's mostly true for all living things.
@theviolater9231
@theviolater9231 Жыл бұрын
@@HouseOfFaust of course it’s because of where they live but they’ve been living there such a long time you can clearly see that they have evolved to live in the Arctic and be predators there they have white fur to camouflage and have the size and strength to pull seals out from the water
@TylerShacklefordDurden
@TylerShacklefordDurden Жыл бұрын
It's like the people on tiktoc starving their "vegan" cats.
@curtisreimer4592
@curtisreimer4592 Жыл бұрын
If a carnivore eats a herbivore it consumes the nutrients the herbivore got from the plants when it ate. polar bears eat caribou in summer months so they still get the nutrients from plants that they need to be alive and if you let your house cat outside what does it do first it eats a little bit of grass maybe a paw's worth then it goes and hunts something. If you fed a cat raw meat and only raw meat, it would die young of malnutrition cat food has small amounts of grain and vegetables mixed in though is mostly meat
@user-dv5nz2ig7t
@user-dv5nz2ig7t 2 ай бұрын
Bill doing stand up comedy in the opening statement is the biggest flex
@kingster14444
@kingster14444 3 ай бұрын
Nye is really good at bringing up good arguments while sounding very casual
@purelyrandom1230
@purelyrandom1230 2 ай бұрын
No, he does not
@neobliviscarisa650
@neobliviscarisa650 Жыл бұрын
Primary credit (and the Nobel Prize) for MR imaging was awarded to Sir Peter Mansfield and Paul Lauterbur. However, Raymond Damadian must also be recognized for his innovation and construction of the first full-body human MR scanner.
@annikee5925
@annikee5925 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for pointing that out.
@davidmcgrath3510
@davidmcgrath3510 Жыл бұрын
They are using the accomplishments to say that they are not idiots therefore their views can be taken seriously.
@nateeaton7729
@nateeaton7729 Жыл бұрын
I don’t think someone’s theism or atheism really matters as long as it doesn’t influence their field of study. That guy didn’t sequence the human genome because he’s atheist, that other guy didn’t invent the MRI because he’s religious; the two are not mutually exclusive.
@FitzpatrickSD
@FitzpatrickSD Жыл бұрын
@@davidmcgrath3510 hahah I'm glad I wasn't the only one hearing that during the debate. Also, The point about how creationist beliefs are necessary to science was a real hoot.
@alphonsotate2982
@alphonsotate2982 Жыл бұрын
God bless them both
@felixxv22
@felixxv22 10 ай бұрын
This video should be taught in all schools. This is what science is and what an open mind looks like.
@googlespynetwork
@googlespynetwork 10 ай бұрын
This is a debate, not science. And Bill is NOT a freaking Scientist. He only has a degree in engineering. Even NASA didn't want to hire him .
@MrJack556
@MrJack556 9 ай бұрын
You're right. Ham did a great job against Bill Nye the buttstuff guy
@tbzwinch860
@tbzwinch860 9 ай бұрын
@@MrJack556how open minded of you
@MrJack556
@MrJack556 9 ай бұрын
@@tbzwinch860 if open minded means believing men can be woman and that there are 80 genders then nah I'm good
@heatherthomas518
@heatherthomas518 8 ай бұрын
@@MrJack556trans people living in your head rent free
@justusb.plorer8773
@justusb.plorer8773 21 күн бұрын
What I find interesting about these debates is that there are two huge factors that would have a massive impact on the nature of the discussion, but that are hardly ever brought up, those being non-christian religions and the possible existence of life on other planets.
@marcanthonymercado7690
@marcanthonymercado7690 Ай бұрын
Someone download this before its taken down!
@christinapatterson6382
@christinapatterson6382 Жыл бұрын
Question, Why does it matter if they used Earth rock or meteorite rock for radioactive dating? (Since Ken Ham believes in the literal 6 day creation, God made all matter in the same 6 days.)
@MrWWIIBuff
@MrWWIIBuff Жыл бұрын
Because after creation the meteor would be exposed more directly to the sun's radiation, whereas the Earth has Ozone and whatnot to change the rate of radiation.
@parallaxladder256
@parallaxladder256 Жыл бұрын
@@MrWWIIBuff That's not how radiation works. At all. Radiometric carbon dating relies on the degree to which a certain piece of matter has decayed, which is to say how the elements inside of said matter have changed over time. The amount of nuclear radiation received has nothing to do with it.
@lemyon8293
@lemyon8293 Жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter all that much, that was sort of an aside. From what I can tell he was just bringing up the irony of dating the earth without using substances on the earth, for whatever reason they do that.
@chucktedder9207
@chucktedder9207 Жыл бұрын
@@parallaxladder256 I never heard Nye try and correct his assumption that the wood dated forty-five thousand years old came to be encapsulated in the 45 million year old rock. Then again, can you?
@parallaxladder256
@parallaxladder256 Жыл бұрын
@@chucktedder9207 Did he say that? Honestly, I didn't watch the whole thing. I wouldn't say it's entirely implausible that that kind of thing happened. I suppose if the rock was broken open somehow... Yeah I don't know. I haven't heard of any geological processes that might allow for that kind of thing to happen. Could you give me the time in the video in which he said that?
Why is this number everywhere?
23:51
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Bill Nye Tours the Ark Encounter with Ken Ham
1:57:05
Answers in Genesis
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН
Я бы Не Прыгнул Туда и За 100 Миллионов 😭
00:20
Глеб Рандалайнен
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
مقلب الكأس الضخم للغاية 😅
00:15
One More Arabic
Рет қаралды 78 МЛН
Мектепте төбелес | Synyptas 3 | 2 серия
21:53
kak budto
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
The Real Story of Oppenheimer
32:52
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Bill Nye vs. Ken Ham - The Short Version
3:43
Mashable
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
Evolutionists Have Fooled MILLIONS About This
56:52
Answers in Genesis
Рет қаралды 514 М.
Norman Finkelstein and Chris Hedges discuss Israel, Gaza, Oct. 7 at Princeton
1:47:41
The Scientist Who Discovered the World's Most Beautiful Equation
14:58
Ken Ham Absolutely DISMANTLES Evolution in 25 Minutes
25:45
Ken Ham
Рет қаралды 126 М.
Most HEATED Moments From Bill Nye Debate with Ken Ham
22:03
Answers in Genesis
Рет қаралды 297 М.
Professor Dave Humiliates Flat Earther David Weiss (DITRH Debunked Live)
1:01:53
Professor Dave Explains
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
The Oldest Unsolved Problem in Math
31:33
Veritasium
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Technicians are testing this LED module. #leddisplay #ledwall #ledmodule #ledscreen #eagerled
0:18
Как исправить!? #tools #usa #энерголикбез #секрет
0:54
Александр Мальков
Рет қаралды 603 М.