environmental benefits.....hahaha...every biochar process I have ever witnessed produces more co2 making the char than one could imagine....yup, to make a little sequestered carbon. And there is syn gas leaching and fine particulate pollution as well.... so, I wonder, what are you saying about ecosystem degradation?
@MYRRHfamily Жыл бұрын
that's incorrect. certification of carbon credits is very rigorous. see for example puro
@glen.simpson Жыл бұрын
@@MYRRHfamily what, fact is fact with most retort burn processes...period. Show me the scale and recovery technologies to render syn gas, voc, and co2 creation a non issue.
@MYRRHfamily Жыл бұрын
are you attempting to use full sentences? you're failing. @@glen.simpsonsee phoenix energy, or douglas forestry products as 2 examples or just browse the puro website. syngas can get burned with the energy going to the grid, while 50% of the carbon in the feedstock remains biochar for about 1000 years. so this takes the carbon cycle from 12 years to 0x.5+1000x.5. I get 500. you want it to capture 100% of the carbon in the feedstock, is that it?
@JoshHeath71 Жыл бұрын
@@glen.simpson The components you mention would have been released into the atmosphere via natural decomposition over the next few years anyways. So ya, in the very short run there is a rise-but then if you zoom our to a 5 year period a significant reduction... which lasts for a long long time :)