Follow us on Telegram and ask your Queries :- Telegram - t.me/successpl... Connect with us on Instagram : ... Follow us on Facebook :- m.facebook.com...
Пікірлер: 52
@amitkumarf49122 жыл бұрын
Absolutely excellent and Marvelous. "The great Chanyakya is the best thinker, educationist ,pchycologist and also in different fields",A lot of thanks, Sir!
@rajarora7035 Жыл бұрын
We in present times really need one more chana⭐
@bhavikagupta91302 жыл бұрын
he is still one of the best strategic thinkers india ever produced. sir u madea very good explanation
@TheBhartiyaa2 жыл бұрын
Perfect information 😍
@MrPawansharma0072 жыл бұрын
Great sir
@anandbhai5472 жыл бұрын
बहुत सुंदर प्रस्तुति।
@ajayyendhe8358 Жыл бұрын
Great chankya
@kuldeepSingh-vm6urАй бұрын
Biography mai thought/ quotation jarir discussion kri sir
@deepikachouhan95312 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir
@sandiplivingandlife2 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot..🙏🙏
@lovestory30292 жыл бұрын
30 minutes is not enough to explain about the legendary chanakya. make some more videos
@ManojKumar-eg7hg2 жыл бұрын
What a great man!! Thanks for this explanation
@indo.russia32842 жыл бұрын
@lavnya arya🌺🌼 lekin Buddha ki Astiya Delhi ke Museume rakhi hai chuitya.. Or changdra Gupta k Intna important person royal advisor hone k baujud Uske bareme na Chandra Gupta ne kahi mention kiya hai. Na Ashoka ne mention ikiya hai..iss ka mention sirf samudra Gupta period me Mudrarakshash mese charter likha gaya hai..koi jivit or historic perosn nahi tha. Fake knowledge
@analien91362 жыл бұрын
Pranam Guruji 🙏
@ajaykumargautam6570 Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@sushilsachanutube2 жыл бұрын
Please tell that 'Why description or existence of Chanakya is not given in Indica written by Megasthnese the then ambassador of Selukas Niketor".
@anahita9342 жыл бұрын
Ye batao ki indica me toh buddha ka bhi mention nahi hai toh buddha bhi fictional character hi hoga.
@indo.russia32842 жыл бұрын
@lavnya arya🌺🌼 lekin Buddha ki Astiya Delhi ke Museume rakhi hai chuitya.. Or changdra Gupta k Intna important person royal advisor hone k baujud Uske bareme na Chandra Gupta ne kahi mention kiya hai. Na Ashoka ne mention ikiya hai..iss ka mention sirf samudra Gupta period me Mudrarakshash mese charter likha gaya hai..koi jivit or historic perosn nahi tha. Fake knowledge
@anahita9342 жыл бұрын
@@indo.russia3284 are gajput kaha rakhi hai asthiyaan?? Kya Tumne dekhi?? Aur ASI bhi kehti hai ki unke pass buddha ka koi archaeological evidence nahi hai, ek daant toh srilanka me bhi rakha hai 4 inch ka aur kaha jata hai ki ye buddha ka hai toh kya sach me buddha ka 4 inch ka daant tha?? Kya uski dating huyi hai??Ashok se pehle buddhism ka kuch nahi milta aur greeks ko bhi yaha koi bald buddhist bhikshu nahi dikhte par brahmin yani ki hindu zarur dikhte hai..ashok ne toh apne inscription me bhi apne dada ka mention nahi kiya hai aur na maurya hi likha hai toh iska matlab chandragupta maurya bhi fictional hai??
@anahita9342 жыл бұрын
@@indo.russia3284 Spitzer manuscript me arthshaastra ke kuch section ka mention hai jo ki 1-3 ad ki hai.aur chandragupta ka kaun sa inscription mila hai?? Ashok se pehle yaha koi inscription nahi milte..
@anahita9342 жыл бұрын
@@aaryameena padi hai tabhi toh bola..
@chandra_himanshu2 жыл бұрын
Joh log chanakya ko imaginary batate hain woh religious aur mordern political ideology ke karan. Warna enough evidence hain chanakya ke support mein.
@shilparathore99492 жыл бұрын
Very good information
@indo.russia32842 жыл бұрын
@lavnya arya🌺🌼 lekin Buddha ki Astiya Delhi ke Museume rakhi hai chuitya.. Or changdra Gupta k Intna important person royal advisor hone k baujud Uske bareme na Chandra Gupta ne kahi mention kiya hai. Na Ashoka ne mention ikiya hai..iss ka mention sirf samudra Gupta period me Mudrarakshash mese charter likha gaya hai..koi jivit or historic perosn nahi tha. Fake knowledge
@MahendraKumar-ef9bd4 ай бұрын
Sir kisi bhi bahri yatri ke lekh me chankya ka naam kiu nhi aata chandragupt ke time me megasthneej aaya tha usne bhi nhi likha indika me
@taradigra64352 жыл бұрын
Magesthnese ki Indica mein Chankya ka zikar kyon nahi hai aur na hi shilalekh mein inn ka zikar hai
@anahita9342 жыл бұрын
Ashok ke shilaalekh me uske baap dada ka naam kyun nahi hai?? Yaha tak ki maurya bhi nahi likha hai aur indica me buddha ka mention kyun nahi hai??
@taradigra64352 жыл бұрын
@@anahita934 Aap nein kahan se pada ki Indica mein bhagwan Buddh ka naam nahi hai.
@anahita9342 жыл бұрын
@@taradigra6435 indica hi toh padi hai, tabhi toh bol rahi hu.. Indica kya Alexander toh usse pehle bhi aaya tha tab bhi unhe yaha koi boddh bhikshu nahi dikhe.
@adityasoniswarnika31932 жыл бұрын
There is no archaeological nor any written proof of Chanakya but our teachers are teaching their futures an imaginary character. Even in Indica , Megasthanes didn't mention any Brahmin minister named Chanakya or Kautilya. Sanskrit was not in existing language at that time. Then why this imaginary character is being taught ?
@anahita9342 жыл бұрын
Indica me buddha ka mention bhi nahi hai toh hume ek fictional character buddha ke bare me kyun padaya jata hai??
@indo.russia32842 жыл бұрын
@@anahita934 lekin Buddha ki Astiya Delhi ke Museume rakhi hai chuitya.. Or changdra Gupta k Intna important person royal advisor hone k baujud Uske bareme na Chandra Gupta ne kahi mention kiya hai. Na Ashoka ne mention ikiya hai..iss ka mention sirf samudra Gupta period me Mudrarakshash mese charter likha gaya hai..koi jivit or historic perosn nahi tha. Fake knowledge
@adityasoniswarnika31932 жыл бұрын
@@anahita934 Bhai Saheb..... Goutam Budhha koi fictional character nahi hai. Inki itni sari murtiyan dharti ke garva se nikalti hai. Yaha tak ki jaha bhi prachin mandir hai sabhi ke garbha griha me budhha se related praman milte hai. Aap swatantra hokar bichar kijiye to mujhe 100% viswash hai aap Bharat ke itihas ko samajh lenge. Mere sath bhi aisa hi samasya tha qk mai asliyat janne ki kabhi koshis nhi kiya
@anahita9342 жыл бұрын
@@adityasoniswarnika3193 mai neo buddhist ke propaganda ko achhi tarah se jaanti hu toh jhooth bolne ki zarurat nahi, sanatan samiksha channel tum nav buddhu ke har jhoothe claims ko with evidence exposed karta hai aur buddha ki murtiyaan kanishq kaal me banani satart huyi hai yani ki 1_2 ad ke baad, Ashok se pehle buddha ka b nahi milta aur dharti se maximum hinduon ki murtiyaan nikalti hai na ki buddh ki..
@anahita9342 жыл бұрын
@@indo.russia3284 tumhe answer de chuki hu mai dusre comment me, pad le ja..
@SURESHKUMAR-zp7fj Жыл бұрын
काल्पनिक पात्र बेचते रहें केवल चंद्रगुप्त के काल में ही पैदा होता है बाद में कोई भी चाणक्य पैदा नहीं होता। जब भारत एक के बाद एक विदेश आक्रमण हुए तब कोई तथाकथित कौटिल्य नहीं पैदा होता।
@deepak-ds6iw2 жыл бұрын
Sir koun pahle aaya tha.
@natureandbeauty70482 жыл бұрын
Itna buddhi Maan aadmi jalkar kabhi nahi marsakta.
@vaijinathgite5456 Жыл бұрын
सर चाणक्य यांनी प्रतिज्ञा करणे का कारण सिकंदर का आक्रमण था l
@lavnya arya🌺🌼 lekin Buddha ki Astiya Delhi ke Museume rakhi hai chuitya.. Or changdra Gupta k Intna important person royal advisor hone k baujud Uske bareme na Chandra Gupta ne kahi mention kiya hai. Na Ashoka ne mention ikiya hai..iss ka mention sirf samudra Gupta period me Mudrarakshash mese charter likha gaya hai..koi jivit or historic perosn nahi tha. Fake knowledge
@lavnya arya🌺🌼 lekin Buddha ki Astiya Delhi ke Museume rakhi hai chuitya.. Or changdra Gupta k Intna important person royal advisor hone k baujud Uske bareme na Chandra Gupta ne kahi mention kiya hai. Na Ashoka ne mention ikiya hai..iss ka mention sirf samudra Gupta period me Mudrarakshash mese charter likha gaya hai..koi jivit or historic perosn nahi tha. Fake knowledge