JUROR TELLS ALL! Amber was the Aggressor UK Barrister REACTION

[@ArtBrain]

I think trashing the jury shows extreme evil. They give up their life, they take an oath, they risk contempt charges for violating that oath. To demean and insult them that way is disgusting. It's on par with Amber's horrendous personality, but for Elaine to do that as well is particularly disgusting.

[@sds7870]

i felt sorry for a Elaine as i thought she was being bullied by Amber and was just doing her 'job' but that evaporated soon as she went to the media making accusations about the jury and other people.

[@loricawley54]

I’ve been a juror 3x and am also a survivor of DV and SA. I always took my oath as a juror very very seriously and obeyed all the instructions given by the judges in the cases I sat on. Knowing that victims/survivors r sitting in the courtroom hoping the jury can help find them justice is something as a fellow victim/survivor that I wanted to do my best on if the EVIDENCE supported doing so. I watched this trial from start to finish myself bc I didn’t want MSM’s bias to impact me, and I wanted to decide for myself. I found AH to be the liar and the abuser and JD to be the injured party. I don’t have Twitter, FB, or IG so I wasn’t on social media either. I decided purely on what was presented in court. Most jurors take their oaths very seriously and do not want to be the responsible party for a mistrial or an appeals process.

[@patagualianmostly7437]

@@loricawley54 I sincerely hope that jurors of the future have your same views on the subject. Thank you. (edited for typo....)

[@leahcasell1487]

This woman is very deranged. Watch out JD who knows what she is capable of

[@marthajohns4740]

Very true.

[@sarahlogan942]

I believe Johnny’s verbal abuse was actually reactive abuse to the abuse he was receiving from amber towards himself especially if you hear the hours of audio were she was going at him and trying to get a reaction from him whether that was from gaslighting taunting goading or hitting him Johnny’s reaction to ghat is called reactive abuse so yes they were both abusive but I believe having lived it myself I firmly believe it was reactive from Johnny to the abuse he was receiving

[@ArtBrain]

One sign you're dealing with a narcissist is they bring out the worst in you.

[@creinicke1000]

His verbal responses were in response to her nasty attacks.

[@kimchi_b]

I couldn't agree more. Like the kitchen incident. It wasn't pretty, but he didn't touch her and it would take a saint to not lose one's temper at her behaviour. Bashing a cupboard or defacing a mirror is completely understandable imo. I am just worried (as per my separate comment) that as this juror's saying they were both abusive is grounds to invalidate the decision. I do so hope not :(

[@miraheil5521]

Absolutely

[@dawndubsky4641]

I think as well that his actions were only reactive, including a push to get her away. She would consider this abuse.

[@andreacollins3204]

I grew up with a narcissist and I have bpd ptsd blah blah and I could tell from one look at how Johnny was shrunk in on himself, like a small child, that he was the victim.,as soon as he let go of the demons you could see that he looked like he was a foot taller. ❤️❤️

[@1ACL]

I think the trial process was very healing for him. He was gaslighted by her for so long, it probably helped to have The Truth, spelled out for all to hear, in such a trial.

[@matc6221]

Yes he did the right thing to live stream it as he knew everyone would see her for what she is. As he said its didn't matter who won he wanted people to understand what she truly is like.

[@sharonsobolewski3707]

YUP

[@rosesacks7430]

I tried to put myself in Depp's place during the trial and I found that listening to Turd accuse me of falsehoods made me angry. Don't know how he could stand it.

[@jessejordache1869]

I think being around his lawyers who he was comfortable with and who from all appearances believed him probably helped.

[@rosesacks7430]

@@jessejordache1869 good point 👍

[@toulamaccrue9906]

There was actually one time when she was "crying" she was supposed to be in this emotional state and she stops and poses for a picture. Stopping in the middle of an emotional testimony where she claims she was so abused to pose for this photograph was just so bizarre. She turning her fake emotions on and off were so disturbing

[@howareyou857]

That was proved to be the flash from a screen not camera

[@sharonsobolewski3707]

YUP

[@sharonsobolewski3707]

I HOPE THOSE PICS WIND UP ON THE CUTTING ROOM FLOOR LOL

[@jessejordache1869]

I remember that: suddenly she put the tissue to her face and held still for about four seconds and I was like "what is going on here?" and then I saw the flash, and was like "ah."

[@andychow5509]

The funny think about the donation question, is donations have nothing to do at all with the defamation case. It's purely about her character. Had she responded in court "no, I really wanted to donate that money, and I believe one day I will, but I just haven't been able to", she would have passed with flying color. Instead, she kept trying to weasel her way out of it. She could have even said she changed her mind because her career wasn't taking off, whatever. But her actual response just made her impossible to believe.

[@paulinalara4118]

I don’t think she could have because they also have her under oath telling a judge she had donated it all

[@latayjones3200]

EXACTLY!!!! perfectly said!!

[@markmathisen3908]

Problem is: if she could do that, to admit fault, her name would NOT be Amber Heard.

[@JustAnotherRandomGamer]

I disagree with this take. The next question would have been the same which is "Why were you unable to donate the money?". The result would be the same. She had claimed publicly that she had donated the money because she "wanted nothing". The donation issue was to establish that she is a liar. There was no getting any flying colors on that scenario.

[@jeninlight]

The funny thing about it is what she is effectively saying is “just because I lied repeatedly publicly, doesn’t mean people shouldn’t believe me”. Ya lied! That inherently makes you unbelievable in a rational world. Cognitive dissonance?

[@ma9x795]

I had never heard her name before all this started and from the little I saw, I was subsequently really quite surprised to find out that she is an actress. I found her very unconvincing.

[@kimchi_b]

I do like most of the Marvel films but some of the acting in that (Hulk after they turned him into a comedy character as just one example) is just as bad or worse imo. Before her surgery (whatever she's had done, botox, lips etc) she was extraordinarily beautiful, and whatever they say the 'casting couch' in Hollywood was how most of them made it at all...

[@TraveisaBlue]

When you consider how AH testified her entire demeanor indicated that she was much more inclined to histrionics and therefore much more likely to instigate violence as well. Her over the top audio rants and fake sobbing simply looked like a temper tantrum

[@alienonthestrip1125]

I love the term "crocodile tears". Crocodiles eyes tear up when attacking another animal.

[@redlady120]

She never shed a damn tear. Not a damn one. A famous cheating croc to be sure.

[@hazelhadley-britt6396]

Yet the expression is an old one which has a list of words that in the end mean fake.

[@Madonnalitta1]

That's great trivia, I didn't know where the saying came from. I love the root of sayings, like three square meals ect.

[@Puppydoer]

Yes..Fake tears are "crocodile tears"...fake smile is "crocodile smile".

[@MysteStorm]

Yet ... still, where WERE the actual tears?

[@sandrawhitehouse3998]

The Jury came back with the correct verdict on the EVIDENCE that was given. Amber was her own worst enemy throughout with her actions and false statements. A child could have recognised she was lying.

[@debraowen6723]

Sandra, spot on!

[@laurad324]

Incredibly fair jury and judge .

[@karenperkins6744]

in my household, a child DID recognise that ..... my 13yr old Granddaughter!

[@Blech-h9z]

She really is. I'd feel sorry for her if she didn't drag other people down.

[@Telcontar1962]

I try not to use bad language in my comments but that jury were absolutely fucking disgusting. Depp was a totally innocent man who has gone through hell at the hands of a patently obvious lying, scheming, theiving, spiteful trollop. His case was so cast iron he wouldn't have done too much better if he was Christ on the cross (I'm not religious). And for all that he has endured, much at the hands of the legal process it must be said, he got his OWN MONEY BACK AND THATS ALL. The award was in effect the return of his divorce settlement IF SHE PAYS UP.. That's it And to get that much he has had to spend $11m dollars at least in legal fees. Quite honestly the jury were feckless and cowardly. And the victory it handed Heard in court has only emboldened her. Yes it was her victory, because no man is going to have the strength of Depps case and such high priced legal representation. And yet he still lost. Getting your own money back at the cost of $11m in a trial which success is measured in dollars IS NOT A VICTORY FOR DEPP or any man looking to the courts for redress.

[@hazelangus]

I took her alleged conditions into account when I watched the trial. Dr Curry was very helpful to me. I took her changeable emotions into account, and Dr Curry said Amber also didn't tend to use "I feel" statements. So for me, I gave Amber Heard a heck of a lot more leeway than I normally would do. I allowed for the flowery language AND her changeable emotions. For me, she was still not credible.

[@MrsSeaHag]

I think the fact the JD was abused as a child and watched his father be abused and never fight back but just take it, is the reason he did the same thing. I also believe, that he went back to using the drugs and alcohol to basically check out. AH never owned up to doing drugs and apparently lots of alcohol. He said he didn’t want to fail her and that everything AH did was the same things he witnessed his mother doing. JD still took care of his mother until she died despite all the abuse. I have never seen anything either of them were in and didn’t follow the whole trial. But it was clear just by watching them in court, who the more aggressive one was and it wasn’t JD.

[@juliefisk8066]

The article that goes along with video is also very telling. Goes into far more detailing. Well worth the read. Thank you for you commentary and all your hard work!

[@louellamoyer5578]

You and the juror are on point! Love your videos! Common sense, etiquette, professionalism and realism go a long way. Thank you for your responses. Can't wait to see Johnny's appeal in the UK if there is one. Would love to be a fly on the wall for that one. Hope you do commentary on it!

[@wendyhardin5259]

A Herd’s gaslighting did nothing for the jury. She thought her over acting and overdramatizing was going to impress the jury. Instead it turned them off.

[@helpyourcattodrive]

My man, you need to get the deposition from 2016 and do a side-by-side and you can even add in some of the recordings do side by sides of her on the stand with this weeping and this bullshit phoniness compared with what she really is, the way she was before. These videos will be evergreen so when somebody clicks on it five years from now and can find the side-by-side, they can easily help to sum it up.

[@AnnieWarbux]

I wish someone would do that.. crazy copyright rules may apply. There's enough material to prove her lies and lack of integrity to make for a documentary SERIES!! I don't envy the person who pulls this off.

[@listenquitely2888]

She wanted to look like an Saint by saying she donated and wanted nothing but really wanted the money for herself.

[@nicpic1985]

She did not donate a thing, my recollection from the trial was that the $200,000 the charities got were from direct payments from Johnny, with her needing to pay the balance of $6.8 million. He probably knew she was full of 💩 and would never pay.

[@kimchi_b]

@@nicpic1985 Didn't Elon Musk make one payment on her behalf too?

[@nicpic1985]

@@kimchi_b Now that you say that I think so yes, which makes it even worse highlighting she was never gonna pay a dime.

[@Jester-Riddle]

@@nicpic1985 She made two separate payments of $250,000, one to each charity. 2 payments were each made by Depp and Musk ... Ask if you want the amounts.

[@nicpic1985]

@@Jester-Riddle that is still not her paying though. $100,000 each straight from JD to the charities at the end of the divorce (so $6.8million remaining). Then $500k in her name paid by Elon Musk is not her paying. Unless she is going to show her refunding the Musk.🤷

[@laurap2705]

I am very disappointed that this juror said he thought they were both abusive in the relationship....obvisously AH was the violent and abusive one, I think AH supporters will use this statement to diminish AH responsability

[@hazelhadley-britt6396]

Read the article that goes with the video. The video is click bait.

[@nicpic1985]

He said abusive not violent. He said "Johnny did not hit Amber". So it would cover verbal abuse (even in retaliation) and certainly not sexual violation with a bottle as she claimed.

[@hazelhadley-britt6396]

He said they saw it as a husband and wife arguing. So basically got ugly at times.

[@nicpic1985]

@@hazelhadley-britt6396 Yeah that is how I view it, I mean I reckon 99% of relationships will have at least one heated argument where the insults are hurled for maximum emotional damage and days of regret and shame by the insulter.

[@hazelhadley-britt6396]

@@nicpic1985 the video is click bait which is why we have said BBB should read the article with the video. It actually explains what heeant by that.

[@Batman-vr6jp]

That's what happens when you lie..... You cannot show real emotion... 😂

[@nfreal-mom]

Excellent commentary. Thank you.

[@urb9516]

Have you noticed that Amber's lawyer, Elaine, has gone missing. She suddenly cancelled interviews and we've heard no more. Perhaps she's been told off? Perhaps she's taken a leaf out of Mr Rottenborn's book and figured out that silence is the best career move?

[@christinewilson6295]

Her lawyer insults the justice system she works at. Denigrating a jury as she has done is so unethical. She should be disbarred.

[@sassfio9097]

A spokesperson wrote a piece for JD repying to her interview .they didn't mention her name just "The defendant" she has become nameless .love it

[@robertlavigne6560]

Thank you for your commentary. As an American, it's very interesting and informative to learn the diffences between our judicial systems.

[@janina8559]

When you sit on a jury you understand what your duties are! It is drummed into you what your responsibilities are and that you can be charged if you don’t follow the law!

[@jessdickson9465]

What ?!?? She just said he balled up his fist leaned back and HEAD BUTTED me in the nose !!! How does that make any sense

[@elizabethstafford5773]

Johnny was never abusive to her. He was reactive in that he would call her a bad name but it was she who was abusive and it kills me that she was still able to convince anyone that Johnny was abusive. He never hit her, the only time he accidentally touched her was ehen she had attacked him and he was teying to get away. Her foot getting scraped in the door, him ACCIDENTALLY hitting her head with his head. There was a mention that he kicked her but that was obvious he wasnt aware that he had and it was another occasion where he was teying to get away from her on a plane. When she would say "you just hit me" that is a statemymade when a person has accidentally hit you. Amber is Histrionic and will make any little thing into something big. Johnny was in hell with this crazy woman and I believe she wasnted him not to be alive. Can you imagine if this jad been a murder trial and she had claimed self defense and Johnny wasnt there to defend himself? She would have laughed all the way to the bank, been a poster child for DV and Johnnys name would have been ruined for eternity. The best thing to ever happen to Johnny was losing all the money because I believe it cooled her plans.

[@Philafxs]

One of the funniest things to me is that truly no one in that courtroom managed to figure out where the talkshow actually took place. Camille said Denmark, this jury member thinks the UK, but it was in the Netherlands.

[@samueljesse2179]

So what a juror said! Hahahahaha LMAO 😂😂😂 the absurdity of that statement is obvious

[@christy1482]

I enjoy your perspective and commentary. Thank you for sharing your views. I agree and I am so glad that the juror is speaking out.

[@gbasai2242]

I have BPD and the up and down emotion go with BPD. I don't believe her at all. She has gave a bad name to many people with BPD. We are not all like her.

[@steggopotamus]

Doctor ramani has a great video on BPD and classifies it. AH is clearly the aggressive form of bpd but there are other expressions that aren't as bad.

[@michelleanderson8370]

Thank you for your insight

[@MorDreadful]

As I commented on a video from TUG. She wants an appeal, but she won't get one why? 1: she is broke. 2: she blames the 19million+ ppl out there on social media in support of a correct verdict 3: she blames Judy the Rockstar stenographer. (how they came to this is beyond even God) 4 she blames the Judge. (see number 3) 5: she blames the Jury 6: in not so many words but in the interview, she blames her legal team, basically. 7: She blames all the REAL experts. 8: she blames all the other witnesses, including Kate Moss, basically. 9: she blames that the "REAL" evidence, no-one knows about or has seen EVER, not being allowed. 9: she hasn't blamed the Tooth fairy yet but I am waiting for it. Yeah, so there's EIGHT things and possibly a Ninth, though it is a loooong shot, that show her chances of getting an appeal are slim at 0.001% at best. Won't be long before she has bailiffs at her door to collect her things for auction, also chances are she wil owe more including her sister, Elaine, Eve, IO (such a dumb name) after they and other are taken for further defamation cases.

[@melaniescott1039]

She manipulates,as a woman, thinking the jurors would respond by feeling empathy.

[@williamevans9426]

I wonder at what point Ms Heard's team realised they were dealing with a liar, and a very poor one at that? Heard's performance on the stand will also not have done her reputation as an actress any good at all! (I think I could have done a better job with the sobbing!)

[@Dicyroller]

I came into this trial a person who has experienced SV, and DV. I was very pro Heard. I had a lot of misgivings for JD as he is or was, a friend of Marlin Manson, who is a DV perpetrator. I saw a woman lie so many times. She would be shown proof she was lying and say she was not lying. I can not go into the extremes she went to, but it made me feel sick. She spent time talking about a thing no one had heard before. Cut up underwire wrapping raw meat. That he supposedly did with a cut-off finger. I can not possibly go into her not-so-honest moments.

[@nifflofair6685]

The UK trial was JD vs The Sun for a statement that A reporter printed, not JD Vs AH. Was that trial only to prove that Dan Wooton wasn't defaming JD but repeating and reporting what AH had accused him of doing in his own words?

[@zoeingham]

Further to AH’s new accusations which now go back to 2011 when before she said the DV started later, is there any way the judge can stop her from talking, given the judgement, and given she has personally been accused of not letting a ‘binder’ of important evidence in to the trial? I feel that JD is being taunted now. It’s almost like AH is begging for him to sue her again.

[@sunnylittletina]

There is so much more that the juror said and they should have read the entire thing.

[@christinemareeyoung]

Thanks for your voice of reason

[@dillonpatterson4310]

5:50 to cover the donation problem its so simple I can't belive they went with this pledge vs donation crap. All she had to say is I have a financial manager who takes care of everything including my taxes and he broke the payments down into monthly or quarterly payments to help manage my assets and budget. Its easy and simple and makes sense. Just explain when she was getting the money from depp she didn't get it all at once so she set up this plan to manage her finances and continued doing so over the course of the year. The jury would have probably accepted that. On cross examinations she would just have to say on the show that she said she gave it to charity because that's just a turn of phrase and is much easier than saying I'm donating the money on a set schedule to help manage my finances. Just say the payments are automatically made and it was out of your mind you didn't think about it anymore and to you the money was gone. That might at least seem reasonable. Don't get me wrong im glad the jury found the way they did its just absurd to think of how stupid they must be to go yeah argue donate vs pledge that will make total sense.

[@DrKumkar]

The juror clarifies a lot of these things in the article that the GMA video just conveniently leaves out. The comment on "mutual abuse" is a speaking to how "normal husband-wife" arguments was perceived.

[@ghostdetectorsuk]

As much as they tried to discredit her DR Curry’s assessment was spot on …she re enforces this every time she opens her mouth

[@earth2becky]

My question is, are Amber and Elaine slandering the jury and the judge. How close is it to defamation again.

[@shaheenaloren6953]

You are a must go for information-objective and very interesting

[@rachelvanaardt1182]

Also check out the written article on the website, there is a lot of extra comments from the juror not in the video

[@yvonnereid1656]

She's a disgrace to ALL victims.

[@heathersmiliekiwi8528]

“Objection”. She heard “cut!”

[@KristiContemplates]

Thanks 3B

[@mercedezlucke-benedict1122]

Great job again I really appreciate what you’re doing on this subject great videos great work I’m a little calmer today about this I’m so glad the jury person spoke out

[@Ashplayz9]

I have watched this trial from the beginning ….. .She is so guilty and should go to jail . She is 100% an Narcissistic person and has no Self Awareness . Johnny Depp needed to be medicated to live with her as long as he did. In fact she made his addiction worse. I feel so sorry for him ……He really did get trapped by this venomous woman

[@jantoles7637]

Did you know that Amber said the ACLU actually wrote the op-ed? She had her input, but those attorneys wrote the article.

[@hibiscusrose6074]

There were no tears

[@Disinterested1]

more dramatic retelling years down the line than that recorded at the time is telling she has such a list of real evidence against her that runs her whole life yet STILL she has a voice!! I wonder why she isn't facing blackmail charges among many many others! thanks for still covering this best wishes

[@MargaritaOnTheRox]

Has anybody verified this is an actual juror? This isn't the first time a "juror" has come forward. Just because it's coming from a big name network doesn't mean it's true.

[@vickykirkland6629]

EMILY D BAKER Is a lawyer in America and has a channel on here . she did live streaming every day to help us law nerds understand what was going on . I'd love to see you both do a live stream together and discuss the UK vs US trials . RUNKLE OF THE BAILEY is another good one . He's from Canada and queue all night so he could sit in the court house, watching the jurors . ( sadly didn't find your channel til a few days ago and im quickly catching up . I work nights at mcdonald's and all 8 of us would listen to the trial , while working . When amber was on the stand and wailing . We was yelling at the screen . Totally didn't believe her . Being a victim of rape myself, a true victim wouldn't be able to flip from being emotional then be all icy cold the next moment sorry just my opinion .

[@elaineagvent5513]

The jury made the right verdict. The jury listened to testimonies and observed the witnesses then based the verdict on truth.

[@750ml]

Thanks for the video and reaction! You didn’t address the issue of provenance though - do we really know if this person was really on the jury, or simply claiming to be? Maybe ABC addressed this issue? But this seems important to me, to ensure false narratives aren’t created or seized upon by AH’s appeal team…

[@coalsoleluvr]

Amber's behavior was in line with the psychological evaluation in the beginning of the trial. Nobody has correlated this fact...

[@neciacorbett6311]

Read the GMA GOOD MORNING AMERICA ARTICLE

[@slushpuppie86]

I honestly think the jury are a special kind of person bc I know that I would have a hard time not commenting to AH like “you’re lying!”,”come off it!” ,”stfu!” etc 😂

[@thevintagepeacock6345]

I’m a DV/SA survivor. Nothing she said rang true.

[@reneelorraine]

Thank You!

[@chrissheppard5068]

I use lies as truth synonymously. This is the accurate statement she should have made.

[@Muffin21814]

Totally 👍!!!!

[@brandyhuber5323]

This is the first time I remember hearing Depp's KY twang. That was adorable! (Listen to the way he said head).

[@nothankyoumam1]

Has anyone noticed that she bites her lower lips a lot? In fact if you were to look at her lip you can see though the lipstick a small little something there that can be from all the biting. Remember she had turned in a pic stating that Johnny had hit her in the lip. but its so clear that she did that to herself...

[@mamac2150]

~~Can the Australian Law Arrest AH for GBH bottling offense, as 'new evidence surfaced' over JD losing the tip of his finger~~

[@Gerrygambone]

That juror has assassinated JH

[@reinux]

There isn't just a lack of evidence. There was clear evidence that she was _not_ physically abused.

[@louisebridger587]

You should read the article it goes into alot more detail .

[@JoeTheLion1]

I agree with the jury decision but surprised the juror didn't mention AH breaking her own TRO by meeting with JD alone in a hotel room - the premises of a TRO is the person who sought it fears the party its against. No mention of the brown surprise in JD's bed, didnt mention AH's previous arrest for DV or TMZ. Perhaps those items carried weight but I would have thought those items were more important than the knife...but, not discounting the knife.

[@jeanmkaufmann]

Recently comedian/actor Adam Sandler had an accident with his mobile phone. He ended up with a black eye and an abrasion. It was obvious he was injured, unlike Amber.

[@dillonpatterson4310]

When you watch her testimony you can almost hear the director yell cut. I'm surprised that hasn't been mashed into a tiktok video. Just her sudden change of expression and then cut lmao.

[@Ginger-Tom13]

I’m glad this juror was able to put their side. I feel AH and her legal team have wrongly criticised the jury and accused them of not taking their roles seriously. In fact her legal team almost imply the jury was ‘stupid’ to come to the conclusion they did. And no one seems to have rapped them over the knuckles for it. Maybe Elaine’s recent meeting, and her subsequent silence, is finally an intervention from the judge or other authority to shut them up!

[@strawberryredz1997]

She don't know how to act like a victim, because she's not. Head of lies. She wanted to destroy him.

[@LottieTotty1]

The fuller transcript of the anon juror on the TV station's website

[@randidolloff6035]

I thought this guy had come out and said it was fake, he wasn't really a juror.

[@angelb4232]

Based on the US verdict and all the evidence that the UK judge whom had a relative working for the Sun. Do they have enough to launch an appeal against the Sun?

[@missuptonogood3655]

Please also read on the entire commentary of the juror that’s on the GMA website. The juror also commented on the knife that AH gave, the photos and the drugs that AH took. Cheers!

[@janina8559]

The man that beats up furniture does it because he would never hit a woman! JD was at his wits end!

[@sakurakuro2417]

It wasn't a UK television show that she went on and said 'I gave it all away', it was on a Dutch talk show RTL Late Night in 2018.

[@BlackBeltBarrister]

I think they meant broadcast?

[@iainwhite3645]

Is the American justice system soft she’s made a mockery of the courts

[@julielevinge266]

Herds interview if taken on face value, she appears to choose to not understand the importance of the donation incident? Saying she shouldn’t have had to donate the money to be believed? This makes no sense?Of course she didn’t have to donate the money, but having clearly stated she had on numerous occasions,this puts into question her credibility? On top of numerous other similar incidents???

[@karlastewart4537]

Are jurors supposed to wait 21 days after the trial before speaking?

[@phoebe_centralperk]

I have a serious question to you as a lawyer. In another Video you said as a lawyer you dissect words & how people use them exactly. Now here is my question regarding what the Juror said about their use of Social Media. Before I try to explain what the Jurors words He used exactly mean, I want to say this is not my opinion, as I also believe the Jury Had other Things to do in their freetime... but here is what He said & what this means " Two ( or three) of us dont even have/Go on social Media & the Rest of us, Made it a Point Not to talk about it" I have my issues with the second part of this statement. Because: The Juror did NOT specificly say the Rest of them ( who have social Media) didnt go on it or Look at anything concerning Amber, Johnny or the Trial... he only Said they " Made a Point not to talk about it". That could indeed mean that one or more of them could have been on social Media but didnt discuss it in the Jury room or with Jury members, which is good. BUT since they were instructed Not to go Look at all, would that not give Elaine a loophole arguing that even If they didnt Talk about it they themselves could have been influenced? Could that not be enough doubt to at least have every Jury member declare unser oath they never looked? So If indeed one of them did Look, it might be enough to raise doubts whether the Jury was unbiased? And even If it' was Just one Juror, AS you have Said before, one Juror could totally influence the Outcome of the decision the Jury Made, right? So you get what I m trying to say? Only looking at the words & their meaning themselves. I would really Like to know your Take on that as a legal expert. The Second Point is the Juror saying they dismissed ALL witness statements from relatives, employees, Friends or anyone that wasnt a completely neutral source... which really only leaves a few witnesses for Johnnys Team to consider,none from AH Side... question: Are they allowed to Just dismiss any witnesses like that, as Long as they do it with both Parties? I know they can If the witness ist caught lying... but was that allowed ? Or did that also give AH or Elaine the Chance to get an Appeal easier? What ist your Point of View in this? Thank you so much. I Just recently came across your Account & nOw I m still catching Up on all the AH & JD Videos you uploaded. Many greetings from Germany. 💞

[@dave0sparky0matkin]

Great video

[@crazynanaailese]

Thanks

[@fromsurrey9538]

The paucity of evidence they had was so little to nonexistent, that they had to introduce ones that are just unimaginable bad, ergo (to borrow that weird Dr's word), presenting a dimmed version of the same photo.

[@ginahaydon8240]

AH would have had injuries that friends and family would have seen, had Johnny Depp punched her. He wears a number of quite chunky rings on both hands.

[@danzjewla]

When I watched mz heard. I kept seeing in my head those silent films from the twenties. The old Melodramas

[@jjee2555]

From the evidence, Johnny was really just reacting to her taunting and abuse.

[@oliviaagustin]

Maybe Amber think that time by looking at the Jury just to caught everybody's attention and be on her side of the story? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Eventhough she's telling LIES AND LIES! 🤥🤥🤥🤥

[@johannadavis7594]

Can someone please ask that juror what they thought of crazy Dr Speigel

[@shadow.banned]

Don't jurors only get like $30/day? In some states, even the progressive ones, employers don't have to offer paid time off. Jury duty can be government mandated quasi-slave labor.

[@kathrynrazinha4965]

While I agree they were both abusive, Johnny’s was verbal, not physical as Amber accused him. His verbal abuse was in response to hers and her torment as well as the physical abuse endured from Amber. He vented to friends and family and she tried to use it against him. I also agree he was believable while she was not. In the UK interview she paused before answering about the donation of funds and by her facial expression it’s clear she was lying to make herself look honorable. I’m glad the juror is confirming that the jury acted as they were directed, what I don’t agree with is that Amber should have received anything. I understand why they went with the Waldman statement though as it mentioned “collusion with friends, etc” and not directly Amber alone. The jury enacted a proper decision. Will Amber ever come to terms with the decision, it don’t believe so. It’s sad really because the only way she could possibly find redemption is acceptance, admission and yes, face the fall out. Eventually it will pass.

[@mangomum99]

I didn’t feel sorry for Elaine when she started to do interviews & saying what she did as she Is fully aware of the law. The one person I felt sorry for was the lawyer who sat on the other side of Amber he looked so uncomfortable & so confused about what she was pretend writing on that large notepad ??

[@thegreygrappler6280]

Question. What are you a black belt in? Great videos by the way

[@cazlovescakes]

Not a comment on the content of your video, but might you consider doing a podcast in the future? I think you’d be excellent, but also not sure how it would potentially fit in with everything else you’ve got going on.

[@lizziesimmi5646]

She is a narcissist therefore does not have any empathy or emotional feelings. This is why she uses learned behaviour and when not instantly reverts back to her empty self

[@r1tac324]

Check out the GMA article for more detailed juror comments. It's very revealing. :)