BLOOD TESTING AT HOSPITAL FOR DUI

[@rtashpulatov]

what if the blood content comes with negative across the board and the charges are withdrawn, can the driver get the refund of towing, impound charges, costs associated with the restoration of the driver's license and the taxi or public transportation charges incurred to get to work? who should get sued to recover these costs?

[@andy4b767]

Good luck with that!

[@woodwalker6025]

I’ve had a look and can’t find one, but curious if you’ve done a video on party consent laws regarding video and Audio recording, photographs and the like in public and in private in Canada.

[@MrJamesmister17]

I believe so, he mentions it's sort of a gray area and it can backfire.

[@ti5826]

1 party consent afaik but 3rd party is a big no no. I’m sure there is a lot of gray area knowing our lovely laws

[@ryanhathaway563]

why would they ever waste time trying to get a warrant when they could just use the magic words "exigent circumstances"?

[@undercoloroflaw]

I'm one of 50,000 Circulating Nurses in the United States. We are a rare bunch. We work in the operating room. As you might imagine, legal consenting is a CRITICAL part of our role. That being the case, these laws are known by only a handful of people who NEED to know them. Let me tell you a story... I find you unconscious in need of assistance. But you are unconscious and cannot fend for self or give consent. This constitutes an EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCE which is the REQUIRED element to declare IMPLIED CONSENT. This means I can ASSUME you would, if you could give me consent to take actions that would either improve your condition or possibly save life or limb. Law enforcement blood draws for DUI/DWI alcohol evidence do NEITHER of these things. If a person is conscious, then consent from the person is REQUIRED in order to perform invasive procedures. There is no way around this. We take oaths too and we full well know a person has a right against self-incrimination. I have never, and I will NEVER draw blood to obtain an alcohol/drug sample to benefit anyone other than the person from which the blood came. PERIOD. I also understand some other laws that give me standing on my position. Only a qualified physician has the credentials and authority to order INVASIVE procedures on LIVING persons. A judge is NOT a doctor and has ZERO medical or legal authority to order invasive procedures on living persons. He DOES have legal and judicial authority to sign a warrant to order an officer to go in PERSUIT of a blood sample. And when he presents it to me, I'm going to politely decline to draw it. These are my unique skills and I will determine in what manner, time and place they will be executed. I sometimes refuse doctors orders if I see a potential for conflict. I don't just follow orders. I use my critical thinking skills. So when it comes to law enforcement, NEVER submit to answering their questions or testing. Let a KNOWLEDGEABLE attorney sort it out. KNOW AND USE YOUR RIGHTS. They cannot turn exercising rights into a CRIMINAL act. Neither can exercising rights be 'obstruction'. Think about it...