Blue Origin New Glenn Seriously Damaged during Test! Starliner Final Decision...

Blue Origin New Glenn Seriously Damaged during Test! Starliner Final Decision...
===
00:00: Intro
00:36: Blue Origin New Glenn’s incidents
04:44: NASA’s updates on Starliner
07:41: Amazon expansion plan
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #starliner
===
Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: [e-mail]
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
www.patreon.co...
===
Blue Origin New Glenn Seriously Damaged during Test! Starliner Final Decision...
What a humiliation!
Just as Blue Origin was gearing up for its debut flight, two serious issues have surfaced with New Glenn’s hardware.
Is this game over?
Plus, this weekend, NASA will reveal its final decision on when and how Starliner will return.
Meanwhile, Amazon is stepping up its game by upgrading its systems to boost satellite launch operations.
Let’s dive into all of this on today’s episode of Great SpaceX.
Blue Origin New Glenn Seriously Damaged during Test! Starliner Final Decision...
Since the beginning of this year, Blue Origin has been intensifying its efforts to prepare New Glenn for its debut flight. Expectations for the first orbital launch are higher than ever. However, recent developments have dealt a significant blow to that momentum, with two consecutive failures reported by Bloomberg.
So, what happened?
The first failure occurred during the transportation of New Glenn’s upper portion to a storage hangar. During this process, the structure crumpled on its own. The cause has been attributed to worker error. Specifically, the rocket was exposed to varying environmental conditions-high temperatures and humidity outside in Florida, followed by sudden exposure to significantly cooler, air-conditioned conditions inside the storage hangar. This abrupt change in pressure within the upper portion was not adequately monitored or managed, leading to a hardware failure due to a lack of necessary decompression measures.
Blue Origin New Glenn Seriously Damaged during Test! Starliner Final Decision...
While the first incident happened during transport, the second occurred during testing. Another upper portion of New Glenn experienced an explosion, likely due to excessive pressure during stress testing.
It is important to note that these two incidents involve hardware intended for the second and third flights, not the upcoming debut mission. The second flight is currently scheduled for around August 2025, approximately 10 months after the initial launch.
Fortunately, no injuries have been reported. Blue Origin engineers are working diligently to resolve these issues. A company spokesperson expressed confidence, stating, "We’re constantly testing new hardware and configurations. Those tests, including ones with anomalies, allow us to make our future hardware and systems more robust. We are ramping up our production efforts across the board and looking forward to even more flights next year."
===
We use images and content in accordance with the KZbin Fair Use copyright guidelines: www.youtube.co...
Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: [e-mail]
To be resolved, thank you.

[@Logoseum]

Is Blue Origin even a space company? They seem to be able to take in billions in contracts without producing any results!

[@colonbina1]

Agree 👍

[@globin010252]

Bozo is just another WEF swamp creature

[@bojangles2492]

The Theranos of space.

[@sambyrd1581]

Heeey 5 minute suborbital flights count too!!!!!! 😢😢

[@Randyluck1]

Blue Origin is a lawsuit company.

[@tedjones-ho2zk]

If new glenn can't go from outside warm air to inside cool air, how will it be able to survive in outer space...

[@colonbina1]

Yes, this is a big problem

[@bio-techlarry9602]

To answer your question of "How", the huge tanks will be pressurized with propellent. They buckled inward because they're not designed to withstand a negative pressure on the inside. Someone failed to do their job of opening the valves to equalize the pressure inside the tanks.

[@DG-wo8fx]

That's what happens when SpaceX hires the best of the best engineers, and Blue Origin and Boeing fight over the leftovers.

[@tedjones-ho2zk]

@@bio-techlarry9602 I am aware of that having a pressurized tank or tanks to prevent this type of thing. But to go from somewhat warm location to a cooler one and it starts collapsing, they have serious issues. Lack of training, poor engineering, who knows at this point, but it's not something I would trust.

[@XCX237]

@@tedjones-ho2zk great question

[@GuyDeSmet]

And in the meantime, SpaceX happily chugs along....😁😆

[@BluhmGardens]

And that's what happens when one billionaire gets into the space-game for the sole purpose of being jealous of another billionaire who successfully got into the space-game and completely revolutionized it...

[@BigLuscious4Life]

Except Bezos has been at it two years LONGER than Musk.

[@BluhmGardens]

@@BigLuscious4Life While I stand corrected on the founding of each company, that particularly makes Bezos failures even more embarrassing. How many rockets has Blue Origin successfully launched into space compared to SpaceX, even though Blue Origin is two years older? Personally, I'd rather people think I was jealous than incompetent...

[@solinuului3964]

@@BigLuscious4Life you listen to fake news

[@BigLuscious4Life]

@@BluhmGardens Blue Origin has launched successfully just 25 times in the 24 years they have existed. Straight up and straight down, not to orbit, just barely over the Karman Line. Meanwhile SpaceX made it to orbit in just 6 1/2 years and has since launched over 370 rockets to orbit. SpaceX has launched over 6,800 of the 14,450 total satellites launched by mankind since Sputnik. Blue Origin has launched...checks notes...absolutely nothing to orbit. Now if you count launching lawsuits to try and slow SpaceX down...well there, Bezos is in the lead by a mile.

[@montedaestrada3563]

Common sense dictates that Starliner returns without astronauts.

[@Randyluck1]

I call bullsh!t on the outside then inside story. Sitting out on the pad and then introducing super chilled propellent would do alot more damage than a 30 degree change of temperature like they'te claiming as an issue.

[@colonbina1]

It will never reach orbit with this capabilities

[@earniemanley8013]

Exactly, whether in Texas or Florida or California

[@AmbientMorality]

The problem is that the air cooling down causes the pressure to drop, causing the tank to be under compression, which it's not designed for. When they're loading fuel the tank would be pressurized

[@mikejetzer4155]

Interestingly enough, NASA had two similar incidents in the Apollo days. The first happened when Apollo 10 was on the pad. Its first stage (the S-IC stage) was loaded with RP-1 fuel. During a scheduled power outage, RP-1 prevalves opened (since power was not applied to keep them closed) and some RP-1 drained out, leading to the crumpling of the S-IC's forward RP-1 bulkhead. After analysis, they decided it was safe to pop the bulkhead back by (essentially) slightly overfilling the RP-1 tank, and the stage successfully launched the mission. The other (more similar) incident happened after the Apollo program was over and NASA was putting its leftover hardware on display. From 1979 until last fall, a Saturn IB was vertically displayed at the I-65 Ardmore Welcome in northern Alabama. The second (S-IVB) stage was shipped from KSC to Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans and then, in September 1977, to Marshall Space Flight Center in preparation for this display. When the S-IVB was shipped from KSC, the propellant tanks were sealed, rather than the normal procedure of shipping and storing the stage with tanks vented to equalize pressure. One night in early 1978, it got down to 10 degrees Fahrenheit at MSFC, causing both the LH2 and LOX tanks to deflect inward several inches due to the negative internal tank pressure. The MSFC engineers applied a positive pressure of 0.31 psi on Feb 13 1978, causing the tank deflections to return to their original contour. They then permanently vented the tanks to preclude a recurrence. While the first stage of this Saturn IB was put on display at Ardmore, it was found that the S-IVB stage was too fragile to withstand the anticipated wind loads, so it is now on display at the US Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville.

[@mjh7609]

I used to think Blue Origin was following the 'Fake it Until You Make It' axiom, but I agree with another comment I just read here questioning if they are even a space company.

[@colonbina1]

They even cannot beat Rocket Lab

[@nv1493]

Consider the billions gone in smoke and mirrors between this and Boeing, let alone other contracts we hear nothing about....

[@jaywest4102]

It crumpled due to going from outdoors to an air conditioned room?

[@the80hdgaming]

Right? How hot was it outside and how good is that air conditioner?

[@colonbina1]

Exactly 👍

[@douginorlando6260]

The hot air inside contracted in volume as it cooled.

[@YK-fw8nt]

Global warming 😅

[@NAV-tv7xf]

NASA should switch to a Falcon Heavy for the Escapade Mars Mission.

[@colonbina1]

Yeah👍

[@edgonow]

@NAV-tv7xf I really do agree with you all. Elon really cares and he can make things happen

[@CarySimonds]

Uncertainty is the Key!

[@gregoryblajian8951]

If a component fails moving from ~100 degree heat to ~68 degree heat, a delta of only 32 degrees, then I would have LITTLE to NO confidence that the component would survive the rigors of space where the temperature fluctuates SIGNIFICANTLY more than 32 degrees. Yes you will be in microgravity, but that is little comfort. Their reason for this failure is INSANE!!!!

[@DLWELD]

It was just air pressure - the air inside the big sealed tank cooled, and contracted - and the inevitable happened - crushed by air pressure. It's a thing.

[@zachtews]

Same kind of thing happened to a Falcon 1 during a transportation flight to Kwajalein - on descent the thing started crumpling - workers drilled holes in it to balance the pressure. Still launched & made it to orbit. Crazy business…

[@paultinker1963]

A MASSIVE YES. It’s no match for anything SPACEX has.

[@roberthumphrey1304]

Seems like they didn't know that the Atlas rocket needed positive pressure 65 years ago. So much for learning from past experience.

[@rajacstrabo8981]

Maybe the management is not up to the challenges.

[@colonbina1]

Why you think so?

[@MrMarco7259]

FAA needs to investigate Blue!

[@colonbina1]

Exactly

[@Logoseum]

@@MrMarco7259 The FAA can't because Blue Origin never launches! 😆

[@dianafink3154]

Delay is inevitable as is a lawsuit to delay SpaceX

[@Chuck8541]

haha Called it! I know Blue Origin would fumble.

[@colonbina1]

Why?

[@ricknoe942]

I guess the astronauts don't get to decide what craft they return in. I would tell them return me on Dragon. You can fire me when I land.

[@edgallagher8675]

New Glen won't be ready for the Escapade mission this year. They'll miss the launch window. Nasa should've chose the falcon 9.

[@smokingfoxx]

Space is hard, SpaceX makes it look easy.. BO=BOO

[@colonbina1]

That set them apart from the rest

[@peterhall8572]

What's the odds on starliner retuning as a meteor shower

[@connordobbin-bh3nc]

high, lol

[@peterhall8572]

@@connordobbin-bh3nc nobody seems too keen to get back onboard and try it

[@geodkyt]

Honestly, it probably *would* return safely, even if crewed. *However* , that is NOT how one does risk evaluation with human life. They have an *unknown* failure source, and *unknown* condition of critical equipment, and *multiple* safer return options. The only justifications for doing a crewed return at this point are reputational loss (both at Boeing and NASA for failing with their crony contract award favoring Boeing) and contract loss for Boeing. Returning crewed would be a decision based on *political* and *profit* motives more so than any technical or scientific evaluation of the risk.

[@peterhall8572]

@@geodkyt would you get onto a plane that was probably going to land safely on arrival?

[@philippostiglione2011]

Starliner is an unsafe lemon 🍋

[@johnbrobston1334]

I note the mention that RocketLab has completed over 50 orbital flights but not that SpaceX has completed 7 times that many.

[@colonbina1]

Right👍

[@danielch6662]

There was a time when SpaceX did not complete a single space flight. If we listen to people like you, they never would have gotten started. But now that they are successful, pull up the ladder, and nobody gets the same chance?

[@nickv8816]

@@danielch6662how long has BO been in Business? Longer than spacex or rocket lab, yet they still have zero orbital launches. They have been given more than enough chances to prove themselves. Time to stop putting nasa funds in BO and give it to companies that will actually do something with that money besides sue spacex. Next time you make a stupid comment try researching the subject a little 🙄.

[@AmbientMorality]

@@nickv8816 Blue Origin wasn't trying for orbital launches initially, and wasn't really doing anything for the first few years so I don't think those count toward its life

[@johnbrobston1334]

@@danielch6662 Bozos has been trying longer than SpaceX and with equal or greater resources has not succeeded. Not my fault that the only thing he seems to be good at is moving boxes from one place to another.

[@richardzeiders5496]

I applaud all of the private space-faring enterprises that strive to make exploration beyond Earth economical & commonplace. However, uniformity in design is a must in crucial areas. Docking rings for the various spacecraft should always be universal, even for the Chinese. Space suit designs Or adaptors must also be universal for all spacecraft life support systems. Our future in space depends on each companies future success & viability. I hope to see Dream Chaser online sooner than later. Quick turnaround vehicles are a must for a vibrant space-faring economy.

[@We_the_People_2A]

So Blue Origin hasn’t reached orbit yet…….but they are launching the NASA ship to Mars in October …..Really ? 🤔

[@colonbina1]

Yes, they is planning to reach Mars at the first launch

[@jhosk]

Follow the money,

[@MrSamaro1139]

2 months to either repair or build a new rocket for an October Launch?? No Way, then a possible 2 year wait for the next window of opportunity. I REALLY have my doubts. Like it has been said Many Times, has BO achieved an orbital flight yet??

[@skunkworks1]

I know whT is that

[@AmbientMorality]

It's a NASA SIMPLEx mission. They're high risk missions that often launch on new vehicles, like LauncherOne or SLS.

[@joetri1970]

Good thing it happened on the ground considering in space the temperature varies by 100's of degrees constantly .

[@chip2373]

By the time it launches, "New" Glenn will be "old" obsolete Glenn.

[@jesseherndon3226]

Blue Origin New Glenn can’t even handle the atmosphere on Earth without falling apart. That’s the problem with a company building such a massive rocket when they haven’t even built something that reaches orbit. Also, maybe building something in such a controlled environment isn’t helpful in the long run. SpaceX out there building the largest rocket we’ve ever seen with open doors and no a/c with multiple test flights

[@WOFFY-qc9te]

14 lb per square inch should not be ignored, what a stupid error.

[@colonbina1]

They even can not beat Rocket Lab🤣

[@danielch6662]

How many rockets did SpaceX blew up? Every one of those, fan boys cheer saying they're actually successes, teaching them what not to do. Hypocrites don't apply the same standards to other companies though.

[@THEPOONPOONKILLER]

As for a crewed starliner return, it's a death sentence. There is no reason why Boeing shouldn't have done a few uncrewed tests shit that piece of junk starliner. That thing is a boat anchor.

[@bobberg835]

I don’t understand why NASA would put two expensive satellites on an untested rockets maiden flight?

[@AmbientMorality]

They aren't particularly expensive (very cheap for a planetary mission) and the launch was offered for a very low price. Some missions accept high risk and others don't

[@MrSamaro1139]

@@bobberg835 they probably have them Over insured and expect to make some Ca$h on an Insurance Claim

[@bobberg835]

@@AmbientMorality I hear you but Blue Origin has never got to orbit in its history. The first launch at any price has a very low chance of success.

[@AmbientMorality]

@@bobberg835 I should mention that it's pretty expected for NASA SIMPLEx missions. Previous missions under this program launched on the second flight of Virgin Orbit (whose first flight failed) and on the first launch of SLS. Both missions failed after launch due to spacecraft problems.

[@bobberg835]

@@AmbientMorality Why risk it. Blue Origin should prove their rocket works before tax payer money is risked on their first orbital launch. Remember we’re dealing with a company that has never gotten to orbit.

[@matthewakian2]

The game is certainly not over for Blue Origin

[@Noneya-bw5gm]

When you source your parts from Amazon...

[@offroaddreams4x4ed]

Slow Origin is the new name

[@Chuckt961]

Blue Origin sure is good at constructing buildings though, so if the rocket thing doesn't work out, you know, they can get into construction contracting.

[@NeptunesLagoon]

They could try to do a mass shipping company and leave space to others that are capable…? 😮

[@Chuckt961]

@@NeptunesLagoon Brilliant!

[@thomascharlton8545]

Well . . . BOs’ giant feather logo is really cool. Right?

[@darbmai]

The Forrest Gump of aerospace manufacturing.

[@TheRealAfroRick]

Yes. It is difficult to see how it wouldn't be delayed.

[@devinhallsworth5531]

Blue origin has achieved a game over despite never getting past the tutorial level

[@patrickdurham8393]

Someone didn't vent the tanks. Rocket fuel tanks are made to handle internal fuel pressure not vacuum implosion.

[@unclejunesgaming4325]

put Escapade on the Falcon. NASA need to bend the knee

[@111smd]

if they are having issues with 95 to 70 degrees then -200 to +200 would be even worse

[@AmbientMorality]

It was a compression failure. The tank won't be loaded in compression during the flight for obvious reasons.

[@DFSJR1203]

NO. ULA needs to step up with more launches. ULA also needs to find another engine provider in case Blue Origin has engine production problems.

[@L5Rick]

Based on NASA's past performance with get-there-itis, (Challenger, Columbia, Apollo 1) Starliner will fly with the crew.

[@lesgamester7356]

Thanks for this update.

[@colonbina1]

Thanks for your comment. Keep following and discussing on our channel ☺️

[@stonetrooper2]

I have to say they do have very cool looking computer generated launches. Very impressive.

[@David-t2s9u]

So it crushed in like a 50 degree swing, from outside temp to inside temp. Kiss this thing good bye with propellant and space.

[@AtTheBarn]

That is exactly what I thought!

[@AmbientMorality]

It crushed under compression, which is not how it's being loaded during a flight.

[@tomjewett5839]

It doesn't matter the United States is going to go belly up financially before any of this happens. The $100 bill you have in your pocket won't buy a candy bar thanks democrats

[@offroaddreams4x4ed]

Sounds like NASA should’ve gone with falcon heavy

[@chriswhite3692]

Hopefully they mitigate this. I'd like to see NG fly soon (not just the maiden flight in Oct)

[@neilalexander2662]

"Whu wu wu wu ... Hey Mo I broke it."

[@marvinellis1517]

Crushed like a Coke can ? Why INSULT Coke ? 😂❤

[@slotvalleyracing]

BLUE WHO?

[@barneyfyfe8313]

Blue Up

[@LivingPositive50]

The only thing I noticed about Blue Origin they sue and slow down progress in the space world, but mostly SpaceX. I watched Tim interview Bezo's Blue Origin and see their employees walking around with their hands in pockets. Their busiest employees are the Janitors. Wow, possible launch mid-2025, definitely way behind SPACEX Star Ship

[@colonbina1]

🤣🤣🤣

[@Logoseum]

@@LivingPositive50 really it doesn't matter if New Glenn is way behind Starship since Blue Origin's New Glenn is not in the same class as Starship. New Glenn's is racing to catch up to SpaceX Falcon Heavy as competition.

[@AdamArndt]

As a machinist making parts for Blue I can tell you I saw stuff like this coming. The engineering drawing of their parts are all over the place. This is the future of blue. They should team up with Boeing

[@crisromero6564]

I just hope and pray for safety in everything and also in health too. 🙏

[@Raptorman0909]

The Falcon 9 was being developed beginning in 2005 and by 2024, nearly 20 years, it is a mature and refined launch system. The Space Shuttle was retired in 2011 and NASA then tendered an offer for the development of launch capabilities to replace the Shuttle and several companies proposed new systems to meet NASA's requirements. Among the most crucial to NASA was redundancy and competition and to that end they selected two consortiums to build these launch systems. SpaceX had a huge advantage given the Falcon 9 was already flying. Starliner was 9 years later than SpaceX in getting a rocket into LEO and have been trying to catch up but Boeing being Boeing they can't seem to figure out the most basic things about spacecraft such as pressurization of the tube to prevent it from being crushed like a Coke can -- with huge changes in temperature they didn't apparently remember first year Chemistry: PV = nRT. At this point Boeing has screwed the pooch and they may never be able to fulfill the requirement they signed onto 15 years ago. If Boeing does fail and NASA has to start the process of finding another launch provider I think Boeing should be required to return every penny of the more than $4B NASA has given them and maybe a hefty fine on top. I think NASA will need some time to decide on the way forward both to give Boeing a chance, another chance, to make good on their contract, but also to see how Blue Origin works out as they might well be the only viable alternative to Boeing. One last point ... the SpaceX fan-bois that are demanding Boeing be eliminated and SpaceX given 100% of the job with no competition or redundancy -- YOU ARE NOT HELPING ANYONE BUT ELON!

[@colonbina1]

Great analysis 👍

[@SkeenCharles]

New Glen failiing... Yippee! Speaking for myself, I prefer Bezos leaves no legacy in Space history. For.... we have but a small window of opportunity and he is blocking competitors. I really hope anything Bezos space related fails.

[@gordonc.tibbittsiii1454]

SpaceX should take over the mars escapade mission

[@colonbina1]

Agree 👍

[@richardquasius4940]

Its been 24 years since Blue Origin was founded, and no orbit. Spacex achieved orbit 6 years after founding. I think Blue Orgin, needs to lay off lawyers, and hire more engineers.

[@colonbina1]

🤣🤣🤣

[@AngelLestat2]

This is what happens when a law firm sets out to design a rocket. Also.. 10 months for the second launch? This company is the biggest joke ever.

[@colonbina1]

What exactly happened with Jeff?

[@edthompson2099]

It's a good thing that a launch then orbit then re-entry doesn't involve cycles of extreme heat, then cold, then heat again.

[@GreenPatriot2024]

Blue Origin won't meet the October launch date and then they'll proceed to sue Mars for not being close to Earth for the following months.

[@colonbina1]

🤣🤣🤣 Bezostism

[@jessiejanson1528]

That is what Sue Origin is best at.

[@lummoxx8586]

Guess Bezos should have used stainless steel!

[@colonbina1]

Jeff should ask Elon for a advice

[@mikepetersen5024]

Let them SEND IT!

[@XCX237]

Great video Kevin

[@colonbina1]

Thanks for your comment ♥️

[@otterpossum9128]

Elon: "You can't sue your way to the moon".

[@murraygingrich9926]

Yes

[@sargonofakad]

Maybe they should sue themselves.

[@JackO024]

Looks like we're gonna need a new New Glenn. 🤣

[@MrSamaro1139]

@@JackO024 you mean a Newer Glen Rocket?

[@JackO024]

Or a Better Glenn ​@@MrSamaro1139

[@NeonVisual]

Don't go into space in an Amazon rocket or a Boeing capsule.

[@colonbina1]

A valuable experience

[@arthurlong442]

NASA’s endless delays on decision for Starliner shows that they keep looking for good news, but Boeing can only continue to disappoint.

[@earniemanley8013]

Uncrewed is the only way

[@colonbina1]

Hopefully

[@joesmith6972]

The conditions at sea level on Earth are much harsher than those found in outer space. Not worried. Send it!

[@chuckprahl170]

It can't handle the variation of temperature from outside to indoors but it's going to handle the rigors of launch. RIGHT

[@challenger2ultralightadventure]

Was Starliner named before liftoff? If so...was the name The Minnow, by any chance?

[@PhilThurston64]

At least SpaceX's RUDs are loud and proud, filmed at all angles and there for all to see. Success or failure, excitement is guaranteed!

[@colonbina1]

That's why BO will never beat SpaceX

[@benjaminmanthey1018]

Yes.

[@barneymiller4088]

I go pretty easy on the new space company failures. They are trying to learn from the ground up. The difference between Blue Origin and Spacex is their ability to recover from damage to the rockets. SpaceX is a manufacturing monster and can quickly build replacements. Blue Origin doesn’t have this ability.

[@mareefahrendorf2174]

New Glenn has gone the way of the dodo

[@nitejazz]

Yes, Blue Origin is in well over their capabilities.

[@paulperano9236]

So how do they expect to go from similar launch weather and within minutes space ? Did BO hire some ex-Boeing engineers ?

[@leonardodavinci303]

Yes to delay. The test explosion will need serious review.

[@justinmeighan9683]

It's NOT a humiliation! Building rockets is horrendously hard. Build re-useable rockets that land on ships is even harder. The team at Blue do great work and will bounce back stronger & better.

[@royb9524]

Jeff needs to stop getting his rocket parts from Temu, there lead time is to long

[@philsmith2346]

No, not 3 astronauts, but 4. One of which is a hairdresser.

[@colonbina1]

🤣🤣🤣

[@BeauLeMow]

Only Boeing is moving slower😂

[@clivecook3611]

Yes…. Blue Origin like many companies have problems designing rockets … but such a failure caused by temperature control you would have thought was basic when choosing materials in construction…. But a catastrophic failure is hard to believe …. Competition is good as all designs are tried and tested … leading to the. Best designs… Space X … learn and seem to implement changes as they need them.. and that is why they are leading in design of space rockets..

[@connordobbin-bh3nc]

i hope they chose a crew dragon to save the crew. Starliner has already proven highly unsafe

[@colonbina1]

Yeah

[@m.k.outlaw3198]

no delay but it will explode. when the sections for flight 2-3 still have problems comming from warm to cold, how in the world will they manage to make the section for flight 1 not implode when it touches the cold cold space XD

[@colonbina1]

Great question. But it's difficult for BO to answer

[@m.k.outlaw3198]

@@colonbina1 its more like an open question, not rly one i thought of getting an answer ^^

[@firstlast-ty4di]

KZbin content generators should learn that terms like "game changer", "transformational", and "disruptive" alert potential viewers that the video is just BS.

[@fiveleafcloverfpv4445]

Same for the title "humiliated" each time. Better come up with something new.

[@flightsimdev9021]

See Amazon parts are flawed!

[@ravencroftgraphics3d]

crumpled due to change in pressure and temperature... what do they think space is?

[@powderperson1949]

YES!

[@davidlee8551]

“Yes or No” ( ; ) Thank you for the report.

[@Agent77X]

Blue Origin is heavily lobbied so FAA is view Blue Origin as its daring!😊

[@properfunny]

Yes it will be delayed. It will be something else and not regulatory.

[@rickydgirardin82]

Apparently with all the issues they keep having to be safe it's going to be delayed a long time

[@truegret7778]

Let's be honest - there is no competitor to BO as no others have failed as often. They have yet to launch to LEO, AND to rub salt in an open wound, BO had to buy a ride on SpaceX to put Kuiper-sats in orbit.

[@ssshady08]

I heard the damaged parts were not for the first flight, that it was for the second and third. Who knows.. I wonder if the employee kept his job

[@colonbina1]

🤣🤣🤣