when a Finalmouse, small size, dot skates, 8000hz user gets destroyed by a crusty gpx 1, stock skates 500hz user or maybe a fkin g502 user
@tyl3rb-fw6eeКүн бұрын
So many of these people don’t want to accept this reality. Lol
@baileyboys2292Күн бұрын
That’s me small Fm dot skates 8k hz but will have to switch to 4khz possibly
@AerobrakeКүн бұрын
me literally (G502 user)
@SoleftКүн бұрын
okay now give that final mouse to the other user lol. My final mouse legit helped me get from imo2 to 3. No going back to a 60g mouse.
@breakiesКүн бұрын
dont forget that the free thinker has 5000hours in koovaks and takes gamer supplements to perform his bist. (he is plat 1 in valo)
@ViscoseOCEКүн бұрын
Hi! I'm planning on adding to the list of Australians who have made a video about high hz and have been doing some testing for it, and from what I've done so far there is actually a visible difference in averages between 1k and 2k+hz in aimtrainers, and that difference was more noticeable on a 480hz monitor compared to 240hz. I was honestly a bit surprised to see any difference but still need to do more testing to get statistically significant findings in either direction and if those improvements in aimtrainers will mean anything in actual fps games is a completely different discussion haha. It certainly isn't game changing but I don't think 1k vs 2khz can be dismissed as entirely placebo. Another thing I think has gone a little overlooked is that there is a bit of research on the topic, there's a paper born from a twitter argument between a researcher and one of the blurbuster admins which was inconclusive but interesting to read through. What stood out to me was on page 7 there was a chart of temporal jitter sizes (which is how consistent cursor movements will look) for different combinations of polling rates and refresh rates and a 144hz monitor + 1000hz mouse actually sync up pretty well, having the same consistency of motion as 240hz 4khz. Some people are also more sensitive to temporal jitter than others which could explain why some people don't notice any difference while others say it's extremely visible. tldr: polling rate matters more at higher hz, imo 1k is fine for 144hz but I don't see a reason not to use 2k if your mouse supports it, and you don't lose fps bc of it heres the paper for anyone interested! dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3472749.3474783 I disagree with a few of it's findings but it was still an interesting read
@ivorybenzosКүн бұрын
yaaay my fav youtuber :3
@forbandyson8921Күн бұрын
thank you for bringing this up, it's nice to have at least something concrete and non anecdotal even if it may be a bit flawed
@PTNOPOTКүн бұрын
thanks for your input
@BrotherO4Күн бұрын
there was no visible difference comparing 1k to an 8k pulling rate on a 540hz monitor being recorded in super slow Mo capture at 1000 frames per second. for reference you can see lighting move at 500 frames per second. the difference between 1000 and 8k in terms of MS is just 0.75ms difference. the avg reaction time of a human is 150 to 200ms. the best are around 100- 120 ms. if you can see and feel a difference. you should not only quit your job right now because you will get paid massively to be tested on. you should go ahead and break records that will stand for all time. because you literally surpassed the best of the best of the best by a whole 119.75 in responsive. the whole thing is a placebo effect. that is before i even tell you, the mouse in question arent always pulling at 8k. you would need to be moving the mouse very quick or be using high senn for the mouse to even use 8k all the time.
@drainstar333Күн бұрын
@@BrotherO4 just say you cant tell the difference and move on bro
@vsnfudgeКүн бұрын
my kids gonna be playing on 32k polling or what
@IrrationalDelusionКүн бұрын
1ms or 0,012 ms, then 0,00001 stuff… Why…
@brzt4256Күн бұрын
bro thinks he's gonna have kids
@AlwaysToxicTankКүн бұрын
Doesn't exist
@voltex988518 сағат бұрын
@vsnfudge dude just called me his kid on 35 000 dpi 😂
@elojys3 сағат бұрын
@@brzt4256
@toquita3dКүн бұрын
I remember Coldzera hitting 30+ kills and being World Champion twice with a 500 Hz Zowie mouse.
@SlarkCSКүн бұрын
I remember Taz literally winning kato 14 with a microsoft 1900s mouse
@stefanpapdi5151Күн бұрын
The same year, his teammate Fer was top 3 hltv using 125hz on rival 300. Literally. Not because his mouse had issues but he just liked 125hz more because a game he played before could only use 125 lol
@notTerabyteКүн бұрын
@@SlarkCStaz was on an ec1 during kato14 iirc
@cloud_conductorКүн бұрын
yeah when sk/lg were winning majors they were all on 125hz or 500hz fer had the highest adr in pro league on 125hz lol
@stefanpapdi5151Күн бұрын
Also those ec2A za12A mice couldnt even get to 1000hz consistently going from 500-750-850 rarely 1000hz so most cs pro zowie users used 500hz since 1000hz wasnt stable…. Lmao..
@Terra101Күн бұрын
Polling rate is such a small variable. Sensor position is a huge one, but one cares, because you can't put a number on it and sell for a lot of money. Because no one cares, give us sensors with higher numbers, higher DPI, higher polling, higher version numbers. If it's new it's good.
@boardzyКүн бұрын
Sensor position is very subjective which makes it tough, and like you said not many people or companies care
@Terra101Күн бұрын
@@boardzy Which makes it even weirder that they are fixed. This very subjective issue, we are just gonna put a fixed random position on every mouse.
@Terra101Күн бұрын
@@Volsia I think it's because of me, ngl.
@stefanpapdi5151Күн бұрын
Idk the finemen has horrible sensor latency at 1000hz but at 4000hz it feels like my other mice like gpx2 on 8000 and viper v2 4000
@Terra101Күн бұрын
@@stefanpapdi5151 Sounds like a faulty mouse.
@JizzburnGigaqueerКүн бұрын
Trolling Rate
@richardhunter9779Күн бұрын
Underrated post.
@angrysocialjusticewarriorКүн бұрын
@@richardhunter9779 Underrated reply.
@denialz2 сағат бұрын
@@angrysocialjusticewarrior Underrated kindness.
@Xaero_ZRX-33Күн бұрын
8000hz 🤏😴... GXSPEED ON 🚬🗿 EGG GODLIKE
@bizzybapcrodieКүн бұрын
ants gif
@hexagonsunКүн бұрын
true and true
@OmarockКүн бұрын
I use 2k as well. Tried the other ones, at 4k (on a 9700k) I start noticing frame drops on cpu bound games that get really high fps like CS. 8k is downright unusable in a lot of games due to lack of support. I don't notice any performance hit on 2k so it seems like the sweet spot for now.
@RomanMlejnekКүн бұрын
exactly, when I got a new mouse I tried to use 4k but I noticed stutters in KF2, realized what's up and went to 2k and no issues since
@aquanosКүн бұрын
8khz is mostly unusable yeah but your CPU is ancient so it doesn't surprise me that you can't even use 4khz
@RomanMlejnekКүн бұрын
@aquanos 5800x3d isn't so ancient
@angrysocialjusticewarriorКүн бұрын
@@RomanMlejnek That cpu is old bro. Toss it in the trashcan and get a real cpu instead (9800x3d).
@K1NGJMZКүн бұрын
Use 2000hz I’m on 8700k and notice no issues
@saintyooКүн бұрын
It's sad that anyone can say x is better without showing any testing or proof.
@chy.0190Күн бұрын
Welcome to fps community. Full of placebo merchants. They have become like how the audiophile community became.
@aeroecarsКүн бұрын
@@chy.0190Yup. Easiest way to call out their BS on the polling rate debate is to make them do a blind A/B test. 100% of people will not be able to notice the difference between 1K and 2/4/8K in any game. This isn't an exaggeration. You can definitely notice the difference between 1K and 2K on the desktop, but never in game. Anyone who says they can are walking, breathing manifestations of the placebo effect. Companies love grifting those suckers.
@shapeshifter7676Күн бұрын
and what's your proof that your choice is better?
@saintyooКүн бұрын
@shapeshifter7676 what?
@Toxic-yt8peКүн бұрын
@@chy.0190 bro just welcome to the internet in general... anyone can say anything without any proof, evidence, or consequences. Always take everything with a grain of salt
@chy.0190Күн бұрын
Half of them CS pros using 8k and 4k polling rate, are using 400 dpi at the same time lol. So they are not really "gaining anything" from using a higher polling rate (not that it matters much anyway).
@shapeshifter7676Күн бұрын
They're gaining a ton of prize money from the tournaments. What are you gaining?
@QuaK3RRRКүн бұрын
why not ? u got lower buttonclick delay so what ?
@MrPayPay-Күн бұрын
@@shapeshifter7676 you gotta be fucking retarded so say this.
@lynxcs145Күн бұрын
it feels like more and more are switching to 800 nowadays since donk shat on the scene with 1.25@800
@JumbobКүн бұрын
cs pros really dont know anything about tech🤣so many of them swear that 400 dpi is better than 1600dpi but that literally makes no sense, it would be the same to say 60hz is better than 144hz.
@kesamek8537Күн бұрын
If you can't win at 250Hz or 500Hz you will still lose at 1k, 2k, 4k, 8k. The limiting factor is you.
@voltex9885Күн бұрын
8k mice are worth using on high end systems due to higher clocks and TSC timer frequency. Sync your components to the same, double, or half frequency for the best results, as 8k polling rate has actual impact only if components are in sync (similar to FPS and monitor refresh rates). To reduce stutters on Ryzen systems: 1 .Enable EHCI Traffic Handling (forces CPU to exit C-states when USB EHCI has traffic). 2. Disable XHCI interrupt moderation. This can save 15-50ms of latency on your usb controller, far more than any mouse upgrade. On modern systems, interrupt moderation thresholds are adjustable, unlike the fixed 1ms on Windows 7 so this one is no brainer.
@voltex9885Күн бұрын
While we are discussing frequencies, to my knowledge, phones and modems operate at 2400 Hz and 5000 Hz, so the closest polling rates are 2 kHz and 4 kHz. An 8 kHz polling rate is safe for now, but we must remember that higher frequency waves have lower range and are more prone to noise. Shielding your 8 kHz receiver with something like aluminum foil is definitely a good idea.
@Scheme-26 минут бұрын
Bugha won the World Cup in Fortnite with the finalmouse ninja air 58, having a max 500 hz polling rate.
@jtdrippКүн бұрын
entire peripheral market is built off mid rank players thinking 'on paper' stats will make them pro.
@laws1n874Күн бұрын
facts
@scotty_teee4226Күн бұрын
So is any enthusiast group 😂
@ArimaSenne1Күн бұрын
it works. all the mid rank players are demons in valorant now. its annoying actually but it's good practice. back in the day all you needed to be good was some basic crosshair placement and a microsoft intellimouse or razer deathadder, logitech mx518
@itsprod.472Күн бұрын
Exactly 😂
@laws1n874Күн бұрын
@@ArimaSenne1 valurant not bueno
@especialistaemmira3796Күн бұрын
An important thing I learned after more than a decade studying this stuff is: just because you can feel the difference-the micro-nuances between polling rates or DPI values-doesn't mean it's actually helping you more than placebo. I mean, less input lag is good, but in pratice, the curve of how much you benefit from it drops off hard after even 1k. Curiously, my findings kinda align with the settings most pro players use. Honestly, I feel like the future is more about custom-made shells than hardware improvements when comes to mouses for e-sports.
@JessicaFEREMКүн бұрын
also depends on the game a lot. some mice lagged my osu out so horribly (20 FPS) that I couldn't play so I was forced to play at a lower Hz. corsair mice are awful for this and I can only assume it gets worse the higher you go.
@LaszeredКүн бұрын
Switched to 500hz because 1k caused an issue in an old shooter I played. Kept it at that and genuinely forgot about it playing various other shooters at a very high level, and on a very good 240hz panel. What I can conclude is that there is absolutely no instance where that polling rate will make you ANY better. Just remember guys, you can schizo about a mouse setting, or you can play the game and actually get better. You will never find the secret setting lmao just get better there is someone out there with a g502 directly on their desk that will smoke you in your favourite game
@IrrationalDelusionКүн бұрын
I reached top 0,1% score in Kovaak’s task on G502 X :S
@kesamek8537Күн бұрын
Git gud is the mouse setting of champions.
@ayda2876Күн бұрын
exactly lmao its all pure cope, Donk uses 1k hz and hes pissing on everyone
@shinefake48Күн бұрын
in fact, higher polling rate can make you "worse". because higher polling rate means the mouse will replicate your mouse movement better as it updates more frequent. This means those tiny shakes in your mouse movements will also be reflected on screen.
@electrified0Күн бұрын
It'll potentially cause you to win in scenarios where you genuinely lost by milliseconds, but those occurrences are very infrequent and will not drastically change the percentage of kills you get in either direction. At best it'll help you get a few percentage points better, but do absolutely nothing noticable relative to another player with a remotely noticable gap.
@XafiaКүн бұрын
1:49 diminishing returns, jump from 500 to 1k is a lot more than 1k to 2k or 2k to 4k. I still personally believe that 2k would probably be the sweet spot though rn 1k is still the most balanced, honestly mouse manufacturers will make high polling rate more efficient on battery in the future anyway.
@aevidytКүн бұрын
Exactly this
@piskoooooКүн бұрын
i'm a 2k truther. it seems like it barely makes a difference in battery life on my ulx too
@stefanpapdi5151Күн бұрын
@@piskoooooUr ulx has better sensor latency on 1000hz (-0.7ms on techpowerup testing) than 95% of the markets 4000hz implementations so 2000hz on it is great
@ChromixxxxКүн бұрын
nah 1k to 4k is a major jump stop going in increments thats your issue
@stefanpapdi5151Күн бұрын
@Xafia also be careful since many 4000hz mice have horrible 1000hz implementations, like more than half of them are very slow on 1000hz
@motion2597Күн бұрын
1:13 Damn 144hz is the new 60hz 😂
@shusakudakeКүн бұрын
to be fair from 60hz to 144 is the big diff everything after feels like 10% diff but 60 to 144 is like 70% diffrent
@CR0WYTКүн бұрын
@@shusakudake this. Diminishing returns plays a role and it just varies between person to person. Going from 60hz to 144hz was an eye opener for me. Going into 240hz from 144hz wasn't nearly that impactful. I played at a LAN cafe when I was out of state with a 240hz monitor provided for a few weeks. I was able to go back to 144hz at home just fine. Meanwhile going back to 60hz makes my eyes bleed.
@2.5stingaКүн бұрын
Lol he gotta be trolling, 480hz with dsc is dogshit. Id rather play 144-240 hz natively at 2k.
@fnvfanMSPRКүн бұрын
I could already tell he knows nothing about monitors when he thinks 144Hz is the cause of ghosting and screen tearing
@vansoffthewall222Күн бұрын
@@fnvfanMSPRMy thoughts exactly 🤣
@willwunsche6940Күн бұрын
My friend I helped teach Overwatch eventually became a consistent longtime top 500 player and he is only on 1080p120hz screen. I agree with the videos conclusion and will rant about 480hz OLED being amazing and super fun for example but you don't need the best gear to be the best or anything. Just worth keeping in mind
@tyl3rb-fw6eeКүн бұрын
Selling something advertised as 8khz polling while acknowledging that it may have instability and recommending using a lower polling rate is all I need to know about these companies.
@HeyNaviКүн бұрын
Has nothing to do with the company, it’s about the games not supporting the high polling rate. Val/ow2 plays 8k very smooth
@lllhunterlll9644Күн бұрын
People don’t understand the advancement and cost of tech. 4K TV were over $20K when they came out. You can now buy a smart 4K at Walmart for like $300. The tech in the $250 Razer and Asus extreme mice will be standard in $50-$75 mice in a couple years. But you always ALWAYS have to have a top of the line leading edge tech product to push it forward.
@noahh698Күн бұрын
I really dont understand your narrative, the fact that 50% of cs pros still use 1000hz just further proves that polling rate barely matters? These guys are so unbelievable competitive and theres so much at stake, if there was and actual noticeable advantage to using 2k polling then they would all be using it. I genuinely cant tell if this video is satire or not in struggling man😂
@goochipoochieКүн бұрын
Cs officially supports aimbotting so mouse discussion is irrelevant
@tezzi7649Күн бұрын
First part is true, but the part about if there was a noticeable advantage they would switch isn't true. lots of csgo pros refuse to use any dpi higher than 400 even though it is undesputable that 1600 is advantageous, although again, it isn't insanely game changing just like hz
@omegaPhixКүн бұрын
@@goochipoochie You are delulu
@FrozokenКүн бұрын
No pros are notoriously slow in adopting new things
@churtchGКүн бұрын
LINK TO THE POLL?
@lucaschenJCКүн бұрын
5800x3d+4070 super+240hz monitor here, currently rocking 4k/8k with 0 issues. Those high polling rates do add additional smoothness in gun flicking scenarios
@cream_mc132Күн бұрын
mac mini (2012) + 60hz monitor here, currently rocking 1k with 0 issues. my mouse cant go higher than 1k.
@evmadicКүн бұрын
This! Flicking is when you notice the higher polling rate the most. Not sure if there is an aim labs scenario that trains this but if there was, you'd see a lot more players favoring higher polling rates to achieve the highest scores
@FriendNotFoeBandКүн бұрын
@evmadic also agreed. I noticed it with my wingman accuracy. I was able to track strafe better on 8k over everything else. Although the extra polling does bring out more tiny mistakes under pressure for me.
@athan1281Күн бұрын
Same setup but 4070 super and 280hz. I was a nonbeliever until i turned 4k on on a whim. Felt the difference on 800dpi.
@max10hoopКүн бұрын
@@cream_mc132 based
@ying2837Күн бұрын
Electrifying
@nawfyyКүн бұрын
truly
@ben9262Күн бұрын
Any polling rate above 2k causes stuttering issues for me in most games
@nakki889Күн бұрын
There is a video already made about this. You cannot physically detect differences after 1-2k polling rate. This is like saying "if the atoms of your skin would have been in correct position, you would have hit that shot".
@CR0WYTКүн бұрын
Back in 2023, ScreaM was dunking on pro players with an old Finalmouse Ergo running at 500hz.
@DreamingPhenomКүн бұрын
Got the OP1 8K last week and absolutely notice the difference between 1k and 8k hz, feels snappier on initial movement and hard stop
@VoltaReviewsКүн бұрын
Hey, that’s me at the start under your Tweet, truly shocking indeed 😮 2k all the way 🔥
@MrGiggles2196Күн бұрын
50+% of the CS Pros using 2k or higher polling, and not a single one of them is using a DPI high enough to saturate those polling rates lol.
@free_microwaveКүн бұрын
400 dpi still benefits. doesnt saturate as fully but still benefits from going over 1k
@EZEQUIEL2007.Күн бұрын
@@free_microwave Facts.
@defiantzzzКүн бұрын
EHHHHHHHHHH WRONG, sh1ro Niko Twist JL EliGE are 5 off the top of my head lol.
@FrozokenКүн бұрын
I mean for one the click latency always benefits. 2. someone on 2k at 800dpi is not gonna be getting 0 benefit
@maxzoRHDКүн бұрын
Open up a pooling rate test, move your mouse around , let me know what numbers you see . Most of the time mouse is working well bellow 1000 .
@stefanpapdi5151Күн бұрын
zowie used to not even go to much above 500hz much less 1000hz on their A-series and most pros used 500hz for stability…
@maxzoRHDКүн бұрын
@stefanpapdi5151 Yeah i mean if you were to move it around like you are playing ( Cs ) in my case, numbers are avg like 500 as you said , or even lower . Its only on constant moving in circles you can hit 1k or higer . And again as you mentioned keyword "stability" no1 wants to think about possible issues, expecialy in some scenarios like tournaments or any competitive game . By that logic, its simply not worth to experiment with, for such small difference . If a high end gear doesnt give you skill, nor will 1ms difference in latency . Its all about being consistent, in competitive gameplay .
@defiantzzzКүн бұрын
Average 4000.074 hz Median: 4001.601 hz 1 Percentile: 3660.322 hz
@cyberfunk3793Күн бұрын
Only way to really know the truth is do some randomised blinded trial where people are given the different poling rates in series without them knowing which one is which and then someone records if they notice the difference. Like 15min per random rate and after each timespan the person has to guess which rate it was.
@S4SK__1Күн бұрын
i was using 8k no problem on my 13900ks and 14900kf but after i switched to amd with the 9950x i had INSANE stuttering when moving the mouse, but sadly i didn't understand that it is caused by the 8k polling so i got myself a 9800x3d insanely overpriced and it was still skipping, after multiple games and multiple days of troubleshooting i found that the 8000hz polling was the problem. 8k is fucking insanely smooth but it just wont work on this rig
@boardzyКүн бұрын
I haven't had an intel cpu in a long time, but AMD is known to require more tweaking generally for high polling rates
@Venus1k00Күн бұрын
At least you have the best gaming cpu in your hands
@TheHandHistoryVaultКүн бұрын
Did you overclock your DRAM? If so, what to? I had the same problem using 8K on my 5950x. I had my memory out of sync, overclocked to 3800. Once I brought it down to 3600 1 to 1. The stuttering stop. Imo, AMD has a problem with overclock memory.
@QuaK3RRRКүн бұрын
fix ur bios...
@QuaK3RRRКүн бұрын
@@TheHandHistoryVault 5600x 8k in cs2 and valorant ZERO Problems!!!!
@hinchlikescake7592Күн бұрын
I play on a 240hz OLED and I just stick to 2K as well with 3200DPI. Don't notice that much (if any) difference any higher than that. Other than the battery life draining much faster. 1k is perfectly servicable though.
@heatnupКүн бұрын
Polling rate is tied to DPI. The higher your DPI the slower you have to move your mouse to saturate the polling rate.
@ultra_0119 сағат бұрын
so basically: is higher polling rate objectively better? yes do you need high polling rates to be good? no is upgrading peripherals/increasing polling rate to push skill ceiling worth it? yes will upgrading peripherals/increasing polling rates make you a pro? no is upgrading peripherals/increasing polling rates useful? only for good enough setups/games that can run it smoothly is upgrading peripherals/increasing polling rates affordable? yes therefore: higher polling rates is worth it
@JessicaFEREMКүн бұрын
CS2 players need to realize that 400DPI is a crap way to play the game
@shapeshifter7676Күн бұрын
When was the last time you won a CS major?
@stevens195_Күн бұрын
it only matters if you have a high polling rate mouse (as seen in the optimum video) you only benefit from playing at 800 dpi or 1600 dpi when your mouse is at 2k or 4k HZ otherwise its better to play at 400dpi on 1k HZ because of pixel skipping
@ctzn1337Күн бұрын
you need to realize that they became pros on CS using 400dpi
@zabi1185Күн бұрын
say that to s1mple or zywoo who is on 400dpi 1khz.
@Mrpremium9870Күн бұрын
What if we’re using OP1 8K purple frost which is stuck at 8khz pull rate and it’s the most responsive and accurate and lowest latency and fastest click response time mouse on market?
@boardzyКүн бұрын
Its not stuck at 8k polling what? If you have a good system+monitor it will feel great though
@chy.0190Күн бұрын
Its not stuck at 8K. And the benefits of that mouse are the same at 1k, its not like other mice.
@merrickxКүн бұрын
in my mind 4k+ refresh rates are taxing the CPU to the degree that the returns are negated and now some sort of negative is introduced. There's no basis for this though, I just choose to think it
@RJ-pb1qxКүн бұрын
The only viable ending for the 8k polling rate ‘debate’ is to say that it’s a gimmick, useless, no one can use it, no one needs it, and everyone knows it and it make makes mice more expensive that they should be.
@VitaminSea13Күн бұрын
I will never use anything above 2k polling until windows fixes the issue with dragging windows to my second monitor. The border of my monitor should not act as a solid wall.
@yvelmence7661Күн бұрын
might be the most fire thumbnail yet
@vlados44496 сағат бұрын
I have a QHD 144Hz monitor it makes no sense for me to use an 8000Hz mouse? Help
@UpgradeLemonadeКүн бұрын
having just got a 400hz monitor with dyac. I started to notice 2k/4k over 1k on windows... you can pinpoint the cursor smoothness and less spacing in trails, more defined. Idk how much that will translate in game. or will the new monitor be the thing to give credit to more. That said 8k vs 4k or 2k is not something I could really see any gain with.
@MorrTexКүн бұрын
Thxx Pollfessor Boardzy 🙏
@tolosonbergКүн бұрын
35000 dpi 8k pollinng rate with pointer speed all the way down and it feels like 800 dpi. Absolutely amazing
@CRAiCED.Күн бұрын
1000 is the old reliable and the standard, 2000 is the chad, 4000 is for ego and 8000 is for the delusional
@radofenixКүн бұрын
Dude, I have a 480Hz OLED monitor and a Viper V3 Pro. I keep the polling rate at 1k because I haven’t noticed any difference, but I’ll leave it at 2k.
@yxzzy300Күн бұрын
The only noticeable difference between 1k hz and 8k hz on my super light 2 is how fast the battery drains
@StaySic4Ever19 сағат бұрын
Thing is once increasing monitor refresh rate you want to increase mouse polling rate, to be number of times higher. We're finally getting monitors with clarity we had with good CRT monitors, be it strobed LCD or now finally OLED yey. So eventually 1000Hz OLED will come, then 8000Hz polling rate will make much more sense along with like 3200CPI that will be fun.
@defi71zhКүн бұрын
my pc struggles to even hit 165 fps personally on any of my games but i feel like people tend to go too extreme with their opinions. if i had the money and the setup, i would for sure try 2k, 4k, and 8k. i imagine for me (as an average or slightly above average gamer) its not gonna increase my skill at the game but i'd love to try it imo at the end of the day if gaming is your hobby and you're working, have a bit of extra funds and want to gift yourself, why not try something new y'know. no need to have your head explode about min maxing
@KamiKomplex504Күн бұрын
Bro never mind the 8k thing ... That monitor is insane, they really making these now? Man we've come a long ways.
@iqflash755Күн бұрын
Hey Boardzy! Hope you see this as well as some fellow viewers. I have been thinking about buying a new mouse recently. The first mouse I bought was the s2, and I loved its shape but it was heavy and wired. I then got the glorious model o minus. I hated it. I dont even know why I decided to cope with it for a year. Now I am thinking of getting a new mouse with a higher budget. The main mouse I have been thinking of buying is the s2dw. But it is $140 for what looks like the same build quality? Is it worth it? Is the Helios 2 pro just as good? Or better? I also thought about the U2 but have never used such a heavy hump. Also thought about op1we but heard it has some very heavy clicks. I prefer a claw grip that can change into relaxed during scenarios when needed. My hand size is 17x8.5 but it will probably grow to 18x9. Thanks!
@xblur17Күн бұрын
3200 dpi is the only way to fully saturate even 2000Hz. For 4000Hz you really need 3200 dpi minimum to saturate it the majority of the time with normal movements. Also 360hz+ is basically a must like you said. Most people don't understand that.
@Fatalvasectomy5 сағат бұрын
The only difference i feel is when i switch from 1k to 2k polling the 2k polling makes my sens a tad bit faster. Is this just me??
@feeblemindКүн бұрын
I find in testing normally a person will only saturate like 70% of their max polling rate with normal mouse movement in games. So at 4k hz I saturate like 2500-3500 on average. With 8k that goes up to about 5k average. I've never actually ever hit 8k limit or even gone past 5.7k peak in terms of my inputs. So yes 8k is in fact a placebo max should probably be around 6k hz but even then only fast paced games like fortnite or overwatch/marvel rivals or maybe cod would hit anywhere near that in general usage.
@sheeperleaper18 сағат бұрын
I got an attack shark x3 was that a good idea or no? My mom only buys from walmart anf amazon
@boardzy16 сағат бұрын
Not the best but not bad for the price
@Presnce16 сағат бұрын
Shoutout mom
@weirdodude117313 сағат бұрын
I use 2000Hz polling on a wired Death Adder V3. It seems good to me. The main reason I don't use 8K is because it seems like kind of a waste with increased CPU use. Thumbs up!
@BohmanderTCGКүн бұрын
high polling rate feels slower for me somehow... im fine with 500-1000
@jiehu1337Күн бұрын
no need to hype this up, donk use 1000hz, get top1 this year, zywoo switches to 4k this year, doesn't make him better, monesy using 2k from 1k, still top 3.
@lorens9092Күн бұрын
On kovaak's i do more frag on 4k, 8k ... and on 1k i do less .. i do the test some days and same result,but I found that playing on a 360 hertz with 4k/8k makes my game (cs2) more smoother than 1k .. it s placebo ?
@lavenderlolxdКүн бұрын
ENDING The Boardzy Baby Oil Debate (shocking)
@nbshftr10 сағат бұрын
2k polling should be the new standard. 1k is a little outdated and 4k has weird performance impact
@tunglinhvu3730Күн бұрын
How do you guys feel about keyboard having 8k polling rate?
@Kryptix0IIIКүн бұрын
I just shocked all over the screen
@spyder256Күн бұрын
I just got a Mchose A7 Ultra, using it at 4K Hz, and I can clearly see and feel the difference vs my old GPX Superlight and clearly aim better. Call me schizo or whatever but I'm confident that if these 2 mice felt exactly the same I could identify them in a blind test. Gameplay while using the Mchose looks and feels so much smoother.
@ChazMcClure20 сағат бұрын
I think saying to use 500hz for battery life is a bit silly. As most people know due to refresh rate on montiors, there is not a linear latency reduction in relation to frequency adjustment. So in English, going from a 60hz to 120hz is a much larger latency reduction than going from something like 120hz to 240hz. The same applies to polling rates on a mouse. The difference in latency is much larger between 500hz to 1000hz than the difference in latency between 1000-2000hz. This is despite the actual frequency jump being larger. I use 2000hz myself but tbh I just use it because my mouse can, not because i notice a difference. 1000hz is more than enough for 99% of people the only reason pros on CS2 use 2000hz or above is because they play professionally, so of course they’d take the lower latency no matter battery impact. They would take that trade even if it meant only a 0.001 percent gain in shots hit. They play for money these small differences could in theory make a difference in 1/10000 situations so why not use it? As for absolutely everyone else they orta use 1k. It’s easy, lasts forever, cheaper, and it’s easy to do well with it. I don’t play competitive anymore but when I did I hit immo on Val with a 1k mouse. It’s kinda a waste in money imo unless you’re a top competitor and have the setup to actually be able to see the difference.
@Gungrave123Күн бұрын
Zoomergroid brain. Higher number = better tech.
@shinefake48Күн бұрын
To be honest, more companies should implement 8k clicks just like endgame gear is doing(EGG claimed that their kalih gx switches are always at 8k with gx speed mode turn on, regardless of what the mouse polling rate is) since not much ppl gonna use 4K and above anyway, might as well add a independent switch polling rate option to use high polling on the clicks
@bug-qe1jzКүн бұрын
thank you i can now sleep well at night
@sergrojGrayFaceКүн бұрын
Copying settings of CS pros is almost the dumbest thing possible. Using pros settings to justify something is the dumbest.
@SDRaygonКүн бұрын
I love when "I am not a pro" becomes an excuse to be ignorant and intentionally not being optimal
@countercorpsКүн бұрын
I really need a guide on USB optimized placement. I have tried to use USB Tree and it just isnt clear cut for me.
@DonbinoКүн бұрын
can someone explain why i should disable c states on my 9800x3d
@adnopeКүн бұрын
1:48 I have to disagree at this part, 500hz to 1000hz is a big jump and even a non tryharding person like me can see the difference, but 1khz to 8khz doesn't give me that same impression, it doesn't even feel different at all tbh
@boardzyКүн бұрын
You’re just going with the grain. Calling 500 to 1k a big jump yet thinking improvements stop there is laughable
@adnopeКүн бұрын
@@boardzy the higher the polling rate is, the less you can feel the difference, if you really think 1k+ polling rate is that important, try to do a blind test to see if you can distinguish the polling rates consistently. Personally I value the 8k on my mouse because I know it reduced a bit of latency for me, but using 1k is just fine and won't hinder my performance
@boardzyКүн бұрын
@@adnope You said you aren't a tryhard and I doubt you have a great monitor. So it doesn't really matter for you, I would pass a blind test and people would say I cheated, no point. Nobody ever said 1k is bad
@KaleTornadoКүн бұрын
Problem with your twitter poll is that you're polling a large group of people, presumably, who do not have access to use anything higher than 1k
@oaktre3Күн бұрын
whats the website / app to check what polling rate your mouse is hitting?
@Creesl4 сағат бұрын
im really super suprised people actually see the difference between the polling rates i played on 4k for like 3 monhts and battery life sucked ass on my ulx switched to 1k still cant see a difference maybe im not good enough 360hz zowie monitor
@Rocket33rКүн бұрын
500 Hz is totally usable, but it usually doesn't make sense to lower to 500 Hz, because performance and battery life is good on 1000 Hz. The thing about 2000Hz is that it's not universally supported, meaning that not every mouse can do it out of the box, but every mouse can do 1000Hz. Also, a lot of people will also be on mice that can't even go up to 2000Hz, like the GPX 1.
@boardzyКүн бұрын
Yeah all true, my point is that if you have access to 2k and it runs fine, it makes sense to use it over 1k for the same reasons you use 1k instead of 500hz
@Rocket33rКүн бұрын
@@boardzy Yeah, I think I agree with that.
@laws1n874Күн бұрын
@@boardzy i bought the sword x, and i prefer to use it with 1k+ highspeed mode, it feels better imo
@jefflum4040Күн бұрын
I’m using 2k Hz. I don’t personally feel that big of a difference between 2k and 1k but it doesn’t really affect the battery life that much so I’ll probably just stick to that until I upgrade my 240hz monitor
@dlo3607Күн бұрын
whats the number for "waaaaay more latency than your opponents" at 1k vs 2 4 or 8k? how much more? 🤨
@boardzyКүн бұрын
If you couldn’t understand that was a joke ur ngmi
@dlo360721 сағат бұрын
@@boardzy i always trust a man with a pie chart, so it doesn't matter then Dr? 🥸
@dlo360720 сағат бұрын
@@boardzy I always trust a man talking over a pie chart. so it doesn't matter then? shocking stuff TY Dr. 🥸🎄
@3xplosiv0Күн бұрын
my main mice are battery-swapped to a 150mah so 1k for battery life but i also play on the same monitor as you (ow / rivals / valorant) and genuinely think the difference between 1k / 4k is just not really that big of a deal (mainly use ulx)
@bzdk.Күн бұрын
i cant understand players that has no goal for e sport or smthn else but they are going crazy for 4k-8k hz polling rates. guys wtf are u gonna do with 8khz if u are playing games for fun? u are paying extra dollars for nothing trust me. i have Endgame Gear Op1 8k and i want to be a professional valorant player one day. im using 2khz polling rate. and if u say me ''go play 1khz'' i can do it. its not a big deal for me. ''even'' for person who wants to be a e sport player its not a big difference. look at yourself guys. first think, and then buy.
@UnavengedКүн бұрын
I am on a DA V3 Pro at 1k (feels the best to me) and 1600 DPI. Mainly play COD, have an Asus 27" 240hz OLED monitor, 5800X, 32 gigs of ram and a 3080 all OC'ed to the max. 2K feels a little off and taxes the system a little more than I need. I seem to actually play better at 1k.
@NoName-st6zcКүн бұрын
This video left me confused. I'm playing on a WMO @ 500hz combined with a 60hz flatscreen. Am i missing out on something here?
@wesleyhanekamp6403Сағат бұрын
i use 8k on the superlight 2.. why? because i can. is it placebo? i think so, but it works for me
@patrikkordaКүн бұрын
Really not sure why people overcomplicate this. I don't use 8K because it isn't stable yet. I get stuttering in a number of games/programs. One day, 8K will be stable. One day, even 16K+ will be stable. When it is, I'll gladly use it.
@hainguyen-z1z6k7 сағат бұрын
8k polling rate feel like a marketing scam, i can't feel the difference between 8k and 1k except 8k drains the battery like hell, my mouse is atk z1u, 240hz monitor, seems like 2k is a sweet spot for me
@boardzy2 сағат бұрын
ATK 8k isnt really well implemented, I use 2k with their mice
@j1mmyeggКүн бұрын
Ok so I don’t have to change my dpi and polling rate. Perfect
@Falcon.7197 сағат бұрын
i use 4k on 240hz monitor for fortnite is that good? or do i go to 2k??
@doomsmithКүн бұрын
Yeah I am using a hub because I work from home and switch between devices while working. I was wondering why the polling tester sites were capping off and was so confused for a bit before I realized the reason. But thankfully it goes up to 2.5k still so, that's not the worst. I need to get a better one though so I can actually test 8k and keep my setup.
@Kevin_silvaaguiarКүн бұрын
The G Pro Superlight 1 has a 1k polling rate and is the most used mouse by professionals with an absurd reaction time. The 8k polling rate has already been proven to be marketing to sell products. 8k polling rate = 0.125ms 1k Polling rate = 1ms The fastest human movement, which is blinking an eye, takes more than 100ms, so thinking that you will play better or notice a difference from 1ms to 0.125ms is almost a joke 😅
@Cinnamon_47Күн бұрын
8k is better than 1k even though you can’t feel the difference. Just use the 8k polling rate if it doesn’t affect your game. 8k is available almost in new mice nowadays.
@anathar13Күн бұрын
6:00 set a high dpi and then use rawaccel and set the sens multiplier to match the dpi before, for example I use 800 dpi, I put 8000 and the use 0.1 as sens multiplier in rawaccel, then you get 800 dpi Edit: with this you saturate the mouse pulling rate at 8k
@SoleftКүн бұрын
it's the same thing, I literally asked the creator.
@zpariah14 сағат бұрын
as a 165 hz user, i really never understood anything more, theres barely a noticable difference. tho granted when i did try 240 it was at a store and i was just moving the mouse on the desktop, so maybe it benefits in game more than i realize?
@boardzyСағат бұрын
Nobody has ever swapped from 165hz to 360hz+ and gone back. It is a night and day difference
@zpariah59 минут бұрын
@ oh alright, maybe when I get a new pc I’ll pick up a 240, got any recommendations around $175?
@MayankJairaj6 сағат бұрын
My setup: Wired Mouse at 2k for normal usage, switches to 8k in game OLED monitor 120hz No USB hub straight to usb port blue one's can do an Amp so i use that.
@tallon-proКүн бұрын
Link to the infographic?
@otaviosakay3133Күн бұрын
thanks Boardzy, great pointers
@PaneledPearКүн бұрын
Why are CS pros using higher polling rates at 400-800 DPI?
@ninabluКүн бұрын
sponsored, most CS Teams have a mouse sponsor and the don't necessarily choose which mouse to use.
@stefanpapdi5151Күн бұрын
the op1 8k and fineman i have both reach 4000hz instantly and stay there even at 800dpi
@kayo29232Күн бұрын
@@ninablu ? lol
@saenstopieКүн бұрын
Yea, doesn't make sense, the cs pros argument is not really a factor in the discussion, they're taking placebo pills just for the fun of it(if there is any fun at all in taking pills)...
@chy.0190Күн бұрын
@@ninablu prosettings confirmed that MOST CS and Valorant pros are not forced to use a particular mice or from one manufacturer, even if they are sponsored. There is a minority that do have to.