Bodmer Papyrus P75 Is Likely A Fraud - Biblical Studies

[@oldtimerlee8820]

Thank you for the reference: Turn out there's quite a bit of discussion on his book. Glad to learn of the discussion on P 75, as well. Seems that yet, another so called "oldest and best" is falling from its esteemed (by some) pedestal.

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Yes sir! Sure seems that way.

[@alexanderschick4607]

It's a shame for everyone working in the field, that such ridicolous videos are uploaded. Alexander Schick Bibleexihibiton Germany

[@ipaporod]

Now the NIV transl. of John 9:35 as "Son of Man" becomes so obvious and bias!.If Jesus claimed to be just a mere man "Son of Man" and the prophesied Messiah then Jesus is NOT God and can not forgive our sins.To the NIV translators the man that died in that cross and was called Jesus was just a mortal being and not the Alpha and Omega eternal being called Jehovah God!.

[@usingapseudonym2901]

The son of man title is a divine title itself. The son of man in the old testament is a divine God-Man. Jesus used this title for himself more than any other.

[@ipaporod]

@@usingapseudonym2901 :Sorry but the Pharisees heard Jesus calling himself the Son of Man many times and they NEVER refuted him or tried to stone him for blasphemy!.The Pharisees wanted to stone Jesus when Jesus told them that God and him were one and the same God. "I and the Father are one." 31 The Jews took up stones again to stone Him. 32 Jesus answered them, "I showed you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you stoning Me?" 33 The Jews answered Him, "For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy; and because You, being a man, make Yourself out to be God," (John 10:30-33). Claiming to be the Son of Man is not a claim of deity (we all are sons and daughters of man, we all come from Adam/Eve) but claiming to be the Son of God it is a claim of deity because God does not have a wife or a Son!!!!!.

[@walkingdead171]

One thing I know for sure, don’t trust anything online, not even this dude

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Aw man. I’m trying to be straight up truthful in everything.

[@walkingdead171]

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa lol makes sense actually if the Vatican owns it it’s probably fake? But then again you can’t readily find English translations so I guess imma learn Greek or whatever🙄

[@12steps2JESUS]

Then how do you know the Bible is reliable? I base myself on manuscripts

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

I base mine on a plethora of available evidences. I’ve got several videos on the channel on that subject.

[@12steps2JESUS]

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa can u pls link them? I can’t find them...

[@bradleymarc4233]

the bible is reliable because it was recorded by eye witness accounts. the chain of custody for the bible is also really impressive for the gospels. Not only is it an historical fact that Jesus rose from the dead we also have 22,000 manuscripts of the new testament , lets compare that to other popular written like the gallic war which only has 10 manuscripts found and we still believe the things recorded in that book. bible is an historical document that has proven to be accurate in history. It reliable and unchanged throughout the years and if you agree the ancient manuscripts are right there compare it to the bible we have today for yourself.

[@danwood4631]

Two knuckle cracks for this one !

[@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa]

Haha!

[@jclp81]

Soon as I had seen the documentary come on about this Papyrus, and The gospel according to Luke and John. I figured it was A Psyop. The Vatican is the Gateway to the Underworld.