Bomarc and X-10 Intercept Test

  Рет қаралды 13,625

rocket.aero

rocket.aero

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 35
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 2 жыл бұрын
BOMARC's an elegant craft.
@jonathanhansen3709
@jonathanhansen3709 4 жыл бұрын
Remember seeing a Bomarc missile on static display at Keesler AFB in 1973 when I was attending tech school in the Air Force. Reminded me of a missile version of the SR71. Had about the same performance capability as I understand. I was an ACW Radar Repairman (AFC 30352). The search radar screen at my site on Mt Laguna AFS, California had a “Bomarc Indicator” switch that displayed the location of Bomarc Missiles in flight. Of course the Bomarc were all retired about 6 years before I got there.
@rrhone
@rrhone 6 жыл бұрын
This is very interesting. A one of a kind video. Thanks for providing it for us.
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman Жыл бұрын
Both the *_BOMARC_* and *_X-10_* look COOL.
@Sherwoody
@Sherwoody 4 жыл бұрын
Amazing designs of the slide rule era.
@africanelectron751
@africanelectron751 4 жыл бұрын
I'm 30 years old and I just bought a slide rule, pretty impressive bit of kit.
@Sherwoody
@Sherwoody 4 жыл бұрын
African Electron there were no calculators when I was in school, just slide rules.
@michaelslack5269
@michaelslack5269 4 жыл бұрын
Those great ole black and white Bomarc launches from the retractable buildings made me think for a sec that I was watching the Thunderbirds. Did Bomarc have an influence somehow in the formation of the show? Just thinking out loud...
@craigwall9536
@craigwall9536 5 жыл бұрын
Funny how much the Navaho reminds me of Eugen Sanger's Antipodal Bomber design...
@markhatch1267
@markhatch1267 4 жыл бұрын
That's just about the coolest aircraft I have ever seen. Might not quite edge out the XB-70 or X-15.
@orange70383
@orange70383 8 жыл бұрын
I realize film on this is rare but after all the effort, time and money put into these missiles you'd think they'd got someone that at least knew how to track them with the camera.
@lilee45
@lilee45 7 жыл бұрын
Damn right.
@cowboybob7093
@cowboybob7093 7 жыл бұрын
ONE job to do. And most likely a million dollar piece of equipment. _"Damnit my cigarette fell down. Where is that thing. I've only got half a pack left. OUCH, ow ow ow ow, there it is. OH CRAP the plane. Where is, oh there it, my cig"_
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman Жыл бұрын
I posted a separate comment about this myself...🙄
@ufoengines
@ufoengines 7 жыл бұрын
Fascinating! Was the FLODAC computer, patent 3190554 ever considered for these aircraft! I heard / read the BOMARK use a Thorium alloy in its structure and that it make the aircraft slightly radioactive. Thorium Nuclear Power! Energy Cheaper than Coal!
@bertrandviolette9008
@bertrandviolette9008 Жыл бұрын
6:00 : Gerry Anderson sequence starts here!
@hertzair1186
@hertzair1186 4 жыл бұрын
5:30 looks like they took off into a rain squall...
@jrdeckard3317
@jrdeckard3317 5 жыл бұрын
The take off only took 90,000 feet of runway.
@sonnyd.6777
@sonnyd.6777 2 ай бұрын
X10 looks like a Gerry Anderson craft
@Strike_Raid
@Strike_Raid 7 жыл бұрын
Not redstone, totally different engine (and predates Navajo).
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman
@Allan_aka_RocKITEman Жыл бұрын
At about 04:11 in this film/video: *_"Uh, HELLO, Mr Cameraman...PAN THE CAMERA!"_* 🙄
@jasons44
@jasons44 3 жыл бұрын
I see they Must have got the idea for a fighter jet engine side by side, looking much like a mack 2 jet ass end
@pistonssssss
@pistonssssss 9 жыл бұрын
They didn't shoot down the target???
@MrShobar
@MrShobar 8 жыл бұрын
+pistonssssss Most likely confirmed only by radar.
@jwenting
@jwenting 8 жыл бұрын
no, far too expensive. The missile is brought into close proximity of the target, then both are recovered and reconditioned to be used again. Actual shooting down only really happens in warhead tests, and even then it's rare as the warhead is thoroughly tested on the ground without a missile mated to it and only one or two full systems tests are needed.
@pistonssssss
@pistonssssss 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I just got confused by waisting of QF-16 drones... ;)
@MrShobar
@MrShobar 8 жыл бұрын
CaptainDuckman The BOMARC has no value, except as an expendable target.
@jwenting
@jwenting 8 жыл бұрын
MrShobar wrong. The BOMARC had a lot of value. It was a pretty expensive piece of kit. In current US dollars, each of them cost tens of millions of dollars. While seemingly pocket change, it isn't.
@petercavellini3232
@petercavellini3232 5 жыл бұрын
Still not sure what’s going on at Area 51?, well, this old footage might explain to some extent what are being or had been,and, that the latest jets we see are probably ten years behind, who says the Cold War ended?, still developing planes and Drones to be that one step ahead....they hope!😎
@levert.gomellewis.8306
@levert.gomellewis.8306 8 жыл бұрын
right then left
Guided Missiles Review 1950
18:50
rocket.aero
Рет қаралды 10 М.
НАШЛА ДЕНЬГИ🙀@VERONIKAborsch
00:38
МишАня
Рет қаралды 3 МЛН
Как не носить с собой вещи
00:31
Miracle
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
🕊️Valera🕊️
00:34
DO$HIK
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
Bomarc and QB-17 Target Testing
28:15
rocket.aero
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Biography of a Titan
19:35
Cape Canaveral Space Force Museum
Рет қаралды 22 М.
Computer History IBM SAGE Boeing BOMARC Missile Defense System 1950's Military MIT
25:37
Computer History Archives Project ("CHAP")
Рет қаралды 28 М.
Bomarc Annual Report 1953
15:55
rocket.aero
Рет қаралды 2,7 М.
Air Force Flight Test Projects of the Mid-1950s
30:22
airailimages
Рет қаралды 511 М.
Why Does SpaceX Use 33 Engines While NASA Used Just 5?
19:02
Curious Droid
Рет қаралды 999 М.
USAF Experimental Test Flights, late 1940s/early 1950s
8:38
rocket.aero
Рет қаралды 14 М.
Titan III Research And Development (1967)
13:34
AIRBOYD
Рет қаралды 47 М.