I often think some of the flak that Classic FM gets is a bit harsh.... then they play Einaudi...
@koolkdny6 ай бұрын
talk of boring music!
@dwftube6 ай бұрын
@@fungalbob Thanks - corrected.🙂
@karrotkake5 ай бұрын
classic FM is kinda... yeah i dont really like them
@ayethein76812 ай бұрын
A lot must depend on whether the piece is long. But more on the effort a person is willing to put in. and of course, bad music is going to struggle to be interesting. So not to be taken too seriously.
@krishlama61676 ай бұрын
The mention of Liszt's Sonata at 18:48 is most likely a quip referencing the notorious anecdote of Brahms dozing off during a recital of said piece.
@themusicprofessor6 ай бұрын
Yes - I seem to have been a bit slow there.
@ukdavepianoman6 ай бұрын
What is often missed out is that Brahms had been travelling for 24 hours or so to reach Liszt's and was dead tired!
@coulomb16 ай бұрын
“Gotta listen to the trombonist now…” lmaoo 5:50
@CloudCoderChap6 ай бұрын
Wasn’t ready for that shade being thrown there. 😮
@ftumschk6 ай бұрын
9:44 Shostakovich based the tune on the aria "Da geh' ich zu Maxim" from Lehár's _The Merry Widow._ Despite Lehár's Jewish connections - he had many Jewish friends and his wife was born a Jew - he was known to be one of Hitler's favourite composers, and _Merry Widow_ one of his favourite operettas. On that basis, some have suggested that Shostakovich chose this tune as a deliberate dig at Hitler.
@waygoblue47296 ай бұрын
Never noticed the similarities between "Bolero" and "Memories", but now I can't unsee it! Thank you for this interesting post.
@yeohi6 ай бұрын
Unhear it.
@waygoblue47296 ай бұрын
@@yeohi That too.
@frankwales6 ай бұрын
@@waygoblue4729 Wait until you spot 'I don't know how to love him' from Jesus Christ Superstar in the middle of Mendelssohn's violin concerto
@tommccanna70362 ай бұрын
Thanks for championing Mendelssohn's op.13 Quartet. An amateur string quartet I used to play in never got beyond op.59 in the Beethoven cycle, as we found the later ones too difficult to play. So we moved on to Mendelssohn and reading through op.13 was sheer delight!
@themusicprofessor2 ай бұрын
It's an amazing piece.
@andrewfortmusic6 ай бұрын
19:12 -- I just noticed that Schönberg's "Verklarte Nacht" sextet is based around the beginning of the Liszt B Minor sonata!
@themusicprofessor6 ай бұрын
Oh yes!
@DoctorJoelThomas6 ай бұрын
If people think these masterpieces are boring, there really isn’t any hope for my compositions. Good grief.
@ST52655Ай бұрын
💯
@darthlaurel6 ай бұрын
As a harpist I've played a lot of Pachelbel. I have to say that I really do not tire of it. It is a beautifully designed, and aesthetically pleasing piece to play and to listen to. I think it is a mistake, a very great mistake, for musicians to make the assumption that a piece is boring because they've had to play it a lot. Just because you have mistakenly drained the life out of a piece by much repetition does not mean that the listening public has. The public is still charmed by the Canon in D, and the familiarity of it gives them great pleasure. That great pleasure is the purpose of wonderful pieces of music. Musicians, do not scorn the public's taste. In that pathway lies unemployment.
@jesustovar25495 ай бұрын
Only problem might be that it has overshadowed the rest of Pachelbel's work, I once read an anecdote of a man who spoke to a priest, the priest said that Canon was the only piece he made.
@darthlaurel5 ай бұрын
@@jesustovar2549 That is sad but at least he knows that piece. It would be good if conductors played other works. It seems that the responsibility lies with musicians to promote other works of his.
@lindildeev57216 ай бұрын
Haydn, boring? He basically invented jumpscare (second movement of the 94th symphony) and found an original way to protest against his employer (last movement of the Farewell symphony).
@jemerlia6 ай бұрын
Haydn? Symphony 80 abounds with invention, its 2nd movement strikingly beautiful, its final movement modulations looking far into the future. Missa in Angustiis: the kyrie explodes into life (in interpretations courageous enough to realize the dynamics), the soprano writing radiating hysteria... Then there are the immensely inventive, often quirky piano sonatas.... Haydn's music always elicits interest, most of it engages the mind and the soul!
@sebastian-benedictflore5 ай бұрын
It took me so long to make the connection. I've been watching your videos for years at this point. I only just realised I was in your class at conservatoire (back in first and second term). 😅
@eugenetzigane6 ай бұрын
The Leningrad tune is actually from Franz Lehar, Hitler’s favourite composer next to Wagner. The tune was called “da get’ ich ins Maxim’s". The Germans were playing the tune constantly on the radio as an intimidation tactic against the citizens of Leningrad, and also to honour their Führer. Schostakovich brilliantly took the rather jolly tune and turned it into a terrifying musical juggernaut. In 1945, Bartók, not getting the allusion, made fun of Schostakovich, by parodying the parody in his Concerto for Orchestra, IV. Intermezzo interrotto. When everything goes off the rails, that’s the quotation. To be clear, I adore both works and composers. Lehar, not so much. He’s like a discount Strauß, in which nothing really works smoothly.
@jesustovar25495 ай бұрын
Reading your comment lately, I find Léhar to be the last vestige of Strauß Vienna, they even met at some point.
@ftumschk6 ай бұрын
17:32 Oddly enough, I dusted off my box set of Boulez' complete works on DG today, and I really enjoyed the first few discs; mostly the piano works, wonderfully played by Pierre-Laurent Aimard and Pollini. Fascinating stuff.
@davidtatro74576 ай бұрын
And btw, Professor King, have you ever thought about doing some kind of analysis video on Chavez? I know this is off topic for the current thread, but if you were ever to do an in depth analysis on his 2nd and/or 3rd Symphonies, or even his Ten Piano Preludes (Not really "even" because they are such a collective masterpiece) I would be your most devoted fan for life. And l also suspect that you would have an enormous amount of fun. And that is certainly more important.
@HappyG1lm0re6 ай бұрын
Reddit is such a depressing, toxic place to spend more than 5 seconds.
@cb4allstar26 ай бұрын
Depends on the sub, really. And the same could be said for any of the high profile social media sites.
@michaelpersil65736 ай бұрын
No - doesn’t depend on the sub. They are only circlejerking opinions - entire Reddit - and for some reason very insecure, which sprouts this certain type of unbearable toxicity.
@anthonymccarthy41646 ай бұрын
I tried it a few times and decided it was worse than a waste of time.
@rockstar-technology6 ай бұрын
@@cb4allstar2 The mythical "good subreddit" may well exist for all I know but I sure haven't seen it.
@cb4allstar26 ай бұрын
@@rockstar-technology Ex. malefashionadvice was** such a wonderful sub. Supportive of beginners while maintaining discussion for those interested in sartorial discussions for the sake of it. Supportive of nonbinay folks and non-masculine wear, active regulars who answered simple questions as well as facilitated bigger discussions. Mods that had basic rules against racism,sexism, etc, backed by a community that agreed with those rules. There are others but if your main stay with reddit are front page subs, well it's hit or miss but I honestly don't think any better or worse than ig, twitter, ytb, etc.
@MofosOfMetal6 ай бұрын
The answers to this question are usually absolutely ridiculous. YES Classical Music can indeed be boring - but the "mainstream repertoire" is by definition NOT boring - as it has gone through centuries of filtration. As someone who goes searching for "Hidden Gems" - the majority of music I hear is relatively "boring" - all of the lesser-known composers are, for the most part, lesser-known for a reason. Having said that - there are real treasures to be discovered! Composers like Raff, Kraus, Alkan, Medtner, Onslow... all great stuff! In fact - I think Onslow is a good example of this "boring" phenomenon. I think he is actually very good - but just a bit predictable and conservative. He was rather well known in his day but posterity has diminished his reputation over time. The composers that "survive" the mainstream repertoire are always exciting, trailblazing, and unpredictable somehow.
@hojowarf64886 ай бұрын
Speaking of "hidden gems" have you listened to Hans Rott?
@MofosOfMetal6 ай бұрын
@@hojowarf6488 Yeah his E major Symphony is great! It's hard to tell how much of a genius he would have been if he had lived longer. He's one of the most promising composers who died in their 20s - along with Alexei Stanchinsky (influenced by Scriabin) and Karl Tausig (influenced by Liszt).
@caterscarrots34076 ай бұрын
I will make a counterargument against your comment that "anything that's mainstream is by definition not boring" with a definitely mainstream piece that I find boring, Für Elise. Every time I listen to Beethoven's Für Elise, I just want to fall asleep cause it doesn't interest me at all. As a child, it was the only full Beethoven piece that I liked(I clarify full here, because I did like the Ode to Joy melody, but I hadn't listened to the full Ninth Symphony that it's part of at the time). I didn't like the Fifth Symphony as a child cause I didn't understand it. It wasn't until I actually looked at and analyzed the score of Beethoven's Fifth Symphony that I could understand and appreciate what was going on. Then one day, I was searching for a C minor piano concerto cause I was just in the mood for such a piece and I was expecting Mozart to be first in the search results cause I was a big Mozart fan at the time and I could search say "Bb major string quartet" and Mozart would be first in the search results. Didn't happen that way with the C minor concerto search, instead I got Beethoven as the first search result. I was like "Huh, okay, I'll listen to it." and was just blown away by the drama packed first movement, the move to E major, very distant key for the second movement, and the rondo third movement. Then a few days later, I listened to the Pathetique and Appassionata sonatas and was again blown away by the drama. That was the start of a major shift in listening for me. I went from Beethoven being my least favorite to my most favorite composer. The Fifth Symphony immediately shifted to being my all time favorite symphony above even Mozart 40, my previous favorite symphony. Beethoven's music opened many doors to other composers for me, such as Schubert and Liszt. But at the same time, Für Elise became my least favorite Beethoven piece to listen to. It went from "I like this piece" to "Ugh, so boring, I just want to fall asleep it's so boring."
@Sunkem1Not6Hacks6 ай бұрын
Would Jan Dismas Zelenka be considered lesser-known? If so, I doubt there is a bigger hidden gem than him. Also, I enjoy Paul Wranitzky, especially his 3rd Sextet in E flat major.
@MofosOfMetal6 ай бұрын
@@caterscarrots3407 I would very seldom choose to listen to Für Elise now - but it's a famous piece for a good reason. It has actually managed to GAIN popularity over centuries. The way you describe your adventure with music is the same as most deep fans of Classical - we start with the simpler stuff and gradually get into more complex music and then get bored of simplicity. But I promise you - if you forget about Für Elise and don't listen to it for many years, and then suddenly listen to a stunningly beautiful performance of it when you're in your 70s or 80s - you will be moved by it again and listen to it like a child once more. Of course we are all able to find pieces of music that we subjectively are bored by, but they are not "boring" pieces, because they are beloved by many other people. The same is true of popular music too but so much of the popularity within that is based on trends, hype, and personalities - so you can only really tell what's truly the "best" popular music by noticing which songs are still listened to regularly decades later.
@FougarouBe6 ай бұрын
I don't understand at all that list ! (Erich Wolfgang Korngold was an outstanding teenager composer as well, by the way. His maturity was very surprising). The phrase phrase in Ravel's bolero is amazingly long, which is a preformance in itself already and the way how the climax is brought and then collapsing is amazing. Haydn wrote a huge amount of marvellous music for pinao, string quartets, organ concertos ... Bartok's concerto for orchestra is really stunning. Mahler's first symphony is amazing too ! My favorite with the 9th (because of the "dying" Adagio). The canon in D is really a nice piece, but in its original version ! Brahms first piano concerto is soooo nice too. The first movement is really great and the second one is full of tenderness and beautiful melody. Liszt piano sonata is THE ABSOLUTE MASTERPIECE for piano of the 19th century if not more (but it must be played well) !!!
@rawvision67016 ай бұрын
@FougarouBe I've been listening to classical music for over 60 years and I know most of the mainstream repertoire and much of the not so well known pieces. Haydn is one of my favorite composers, but I was unaware that he wrote organ concertos. I was ready to correct you by saying that you meant Handel, but you're right. Now I have something new to be acquainted with. BTW, his brother, Michael wrote some wonderful pieces also.
@SRPM-yk9xw6 ай бұрын
Can you name a piece which shouldn't be played well?
@jesustovar25495 ай бұрын
Wow, I fully agree with you, yes I love Mahler 1, I think it is a great introduction to his symphony, being the first one and the shortest, Pachelbel's Canon in it's original version is beautiful, but people tend to forget the Gigue.
@jesustovar25495 ай бұрын
@@rawvision6701Wait, Haydn wrote organ concertos? I'm way younger than you but I didn't know that, I'm gonna check it out, that man could do everything.
@karrotkake5 ай бұрын
im not really sure how you could even classify shostakovich's 7th symphony as "boring". im assuming whoever said that hasn't listened to the full symphony but only the 1st movement where it sort of drags on for a while before the outbursts. i can understand if someone were to say that it were too harsh for them, or they didn't like it very much, but "boring" just doesn't really fit for this symphony
@JeffreyLByrd6 ай бұрын
Many of these are clearly conflating boring with “I don’t like this” and/or “I’m tired of playing this.” I love Bolero, but I used to play Bassoon/Contrabassoon in an orchestra and it is dreadful to play as a contrabassonist. I should add that most of my favorite pieces with cbssn parts, I’d much rather listen to the than play them. There are certainly notable exceptions, but it’s a whole lot of sitting around sometimes.
@Iceland8746 ай бұрын
Now we need a video on most adventurous and exciting music. Kurt Atterberg’s 6th symphony. Brahm’s Requiem, Richard Strauss tone poems, Vaughan Williams Sea Symphony… so many lovely works.
@raptor49166 ай бұрын
Martinu's P 41 is such a bright piece of music
@jesustovar25495 ай бұрын
I love Richard Strauss adventurous music, such adventurous music that probably inspired Korngold.
@Phenographic5 ай бұрын
As much as I love Strauss and his tone poems, Ein Heldenleben is a piece I would not be surprised to see on a list of boring pieces given how long the love theme goes on for!
@_Helm_5 ай бұрын
That was such a lovely time, Profession. Thank you very much.
@sthxdnn16 ай бұрын
I use reddit constantly. and i've found recently that reddit musicians are always so confidently incorrect and the hivemind show's harder than ever because none of them know what they're talking about. it is infuriating. i decided to just not interact with music subreddits ouitside of r/music because rarely is genre or skill ever discussed.
@Fanchen5 ай бұрын
They’re a bunch of pretentious philistines
@dabeamer422 ай бұрын
Thanks for the reference to that early Mendelssohn quartet -- I'm eager to give it a listen! You are talking about #2, Op. 13, no? (Since #1 is in E-flat, and you said a minor) Oh, and in reference to Bolero -- it has always been my opinion that music is virtually always more interesting to perform than to listen to. Bolero is the exception to that rule that leaps most quickly to mind. It's not interesting to listen to, but it has to be absolute to death to play -- esp. if you're in the percussion section. You've got a new sub here.
@themusicprofessor2 ай бұрын
Op. 13 no. 2 A minor. Astonishing masterpiece by an 18 year old!
@dabeamer422 ай бұрын
@@themusicprofessor Many thanks; I've added it to a couple of playlists.
@schubertuk6 ай бұрын
How anybody found Brahm's Piano Concerto 1 soporific I find difficult to fathom! I admit it took me more than one performance to fall in completely love with it, but it is far too dramatic to ever be called boring or sleep-inducing. Shostakovich's Leningrad Symphony is yet another fascinating claim for boring, which I reject. I think the Professor correctly identifies 'banal' as a key theme Dmitri was aiming at. But I am of the view that in conception this piece was originally conceived about what Stalin had done to Leningrad, more than what the Nazi's were doing. Dmitri could not safely admit this, and perhaps was happy for the piece to be appropriated for the siege. However it fits the view of a Dictator suppressing popular music (like the Tahiti Trot) and instead saying some dull artless 'overtly chirpy tune' shouod make the citizens happy why not all dance to that? Once I think of the piece in this light, the genius becomes clear, the critique becomes clear, and the musical journey of the symphony makes so much more sense.
@JeremyJeffes-m2g6 ай бұрын
18:47 - Is this not a reference to when Brahms fell asleep while Liszt himself performed the sonata? Rather than an actual statement against the sonata?
@themusicprofessor6 ай бұрын
Yes it is and I should have pointed that out because it's an interesting story.
@clavichord6 ай бұрын
John Cage's 4'33"
@clavichord6 ай бұрын
@@Ana_crusis Only the last ten seconds? 🤣
@peterney24026 ай бұрын
Tried playing that one, made a few mistakes, I think I went deaf in my left eye.
@CarterFelixOfficial5 ай бұрын
@@Ana_crusis Not a fan of the solo part 2 minutes in
@climate426 ай бұрын
Back to haydn: no one matched his string quartets. There are about 40 great ones.
@michaelfurbank35045 ай бұрын
The fact that you can replicate the sound of the offstage trumpets at the beginning of Mahler 1 on the piano from memory is the most impressive thing I've seen in a while.
@patrickhackett78816 ай бұрын
Haydn's 39th symphony possibly inspired Mozart's Little G Minor Symphony. It's worth a listen.
@climate426 ай бұрын
It's a better symphony than mozart's
@LoriKirkpatrick6 ай бұрын
I couldn't disagree more about Haydn...if you listen to him without all of the historical importance in mind, you will always be surprised by his music...listen to the Paris Symphonies without bias...fantastic!!!
@davidannderson97965 ай бұрын
Thank you for bringing the Mendelssohn viola sonata to my attention! That's about as boring as an evening in Yosemite! Simply gorgeous! Edit: at one point Mahler's first symphony was my favorite piece of music of all time, until I discovered Mahler's second and third- these three symphonies are still in my mind one of the biggest, most exciting high points in all music! Liszt's piano sonata too is one of the all-time high points in all music for me, in somewhat a similar way to Mahler's first three symphonies! I will say, though, that like many of Liszt's most exciting pieces, the sonata simply does not come off unless the performer is willing to go completely, sincerely over the top with it, especially with the gypsy dance feel in it. The performer needs to sincerely believe in the over the top elements, and not play them like a parody or anything, and the gypsy dance feel must be there where it is present, for this is often a unifying element in the feel and structure of the pieces that use it. Only then will the piece work, and then it becomes one of the most thrilling, exciting things that I have ever heard!
@schubertuk6 ай бұрын
I've thought more about the subject of this video - and whether there is wrong with finding, for instance, Pachabel's Canon boring or not? It is clearly a masterpiece, and I have adored it at points in my life, but it is seriously overexposed getting far too much airing on 'classical' radio stations, and as background for adverts, or even within films and TV series - and let us not mention the countless shopping centres that employ it. Overexposure can make even the greatest of music over time eventually boring. Even a great Bach fugue, or a late Beethoven String Quartet could be dulled by overplaying - and that is surely a modern indulgence of society since the invention of recording equipment, and the ability to constantly replay what none of the pre-20th century music masters would have ever imagined to be tasteful. So great music, I can argue can be boring by overexposure. But there is a second point, no piece of music can or should try to aim to please all. Such a piece I would argue would be necessarily bland - because it will also not be trying to displease, or shock anyone. As such I am perfectly comfortable with people telling me they find Beethoven' Hammerklavier Sonata boring. It is a valid opinion, I just don't happen to share it, and the musical world is immeasurably richer because of these varied opinions. I would argue there is NO single piece of music that everyone on the planet will agree is exciting and wonderful, and too often the term 'masterpiece' is used as a defence to any criticism, which I think is a mistake. In the end, if Reddit users wish to claim any masterpiece is 'boring' - so be it, it is a valid view - although I wish they would illuminate us on the reasoning more articulately. What would be more interesting is claiming which musical pieces they find the most exciting, and why - because that might introduce me to a new great piece of music and do us all a service.
@themusicprofessor6 ай бұрын
Wise comment. Thank you.
@SO-ym3zs6 ай бұрын
Why would you spend time on Reddit for anything? Particularly when you could be listening music.
@TheGloryofMusic6 ай бұрын
My idea of a party is to break open some kombucha and listen to Frescobaldi's Fiori Musicali.
@TimothyReeves6 ай бұрын
I *love* that you compared teenage Mendelssohn with teenage Stevie Wonder! Yes, both geniuses.
@patrickhackett78816 ай бұрын
The Leningrad symphony isn't Shostakovich's best symphony , but how can anyone dislike the climax the march reaches in the first movement, the outburst of rage in the slow movement, or the entire second movement?
@LeGrandJohnson4 ай бұрын
I love the ending of the fourth movement
@jaydenfung16 ай бұрын
I kid you not when I say my my eyebrows raised and eyes widened when someone put down all of Haydn. As the writer kept going, my jaw dropped, too. I was just shocked that anyone, at least someone with interest in classical music, could find Haydn boring!
@rawvision67016 ай бұрын
@jaydenfung1 Yes, if Haydn's Creation is boring, then all of classical music must be boring. If one listens to ALL of the 104 symphonies and is not struck by the ingenious variety of expression and innovation, there is no hope. The sonatas, the masses, and so many other pieces are the works of a true genius.
@MaggaraMarine6 ай бұрын
I have heard boring performances of Haydn. But when I heard the same exact piece performed by an actually good orchestra that knew what it was doing (conducted by Giovanni Antonini), the difference was night and day. Suddenly the boring and bland music became really interesting. Actually a really good example is that Stamitz performance shown in the video. It just sounds terrible. I'm bored after the first 10 seconds. I listened to another version of it that sounded so much better. Is it the most exciting music out there? Definitely not. But it still does its job. (And the nice thing is, it isn't too long.) All in all, older music tends to require performers that know what they are doing. The music itself isn't necessarily the most exciting thing out there - the performers need to make it exciting. A lot of baroque and early classical music can sound really boring if the musicians aren't experts of the style.
@jaydenfung16 ай бұрын
@@MaggaraMarine Like Matthew King said, context is important! You are right about all of this.
@anthonycook62136 ай бұрын
Stravinsky considered Haydn to be the most innovative of all composers. Haydn also has lots of hidden Easter-eggs for attentive listeners in many of his pieces.
@lovaaaa24516 ай бұрын
I love listening to you speak about the literature. Will you talk about the marvels of the Scriabin sonatas?
@themusicprofessor6 ай бұрын
I do admire Scriabin but actually I need to spend more time with his sonatas before I feel qualified to discuss them.
@myouatt59876 ай бұрын
'Boring' I think is a cliché and covers a range of meanings in this context - sure, there are pieces I like and pieces I like less, but there is also joy in seeing the progression from one composer to another (or another genre), so I find the fundamental Reddit argument a bit trite and there is always something to learn. Is 'boring' what one perceives personally or is it what one's exposed to (sometimes frequently again and again e.g. Zadok the Priest/Champions League)? Everything is part of a process and has its value. Much more impressed btw is by you playing Liszt's B minor sonata - congrats! I had to study that as part of my A-Level course a million years ago ... and when we get to the theme in the piano score around page 8 or so, shivers still go down my spine (and several times thereafter)! For me personally, that piece is not boring! (... at all imo!)
@adamguitar14986 ай бұрын
Fantastic polish on the upright piano! I like being able to see the view you get to have
@notmyworld446 ай бұрын
I must have played Ravel's Bolero 5 or 6 dozen times during my long career as a double-bass player. Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Are you tired of this yet? Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Let me know when you've had enough. Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). NO! It's not over yet!!! Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). Plunk, plunk, plunk, (rest). etc. ad infinitum
@ftumschk6 ай бұрын
I never knew that Boléro had lyrics ;)
@notmyworld446 ай бұрын
@@ftumschk You'd never understand unless you were a bass or 'cello player. 😏
@peterwimmer12596 ай бұрын
Double basses are often sentenced to play such parts, not only in the Bolero. That's due to their role in orchestra and possibly a necessity in the whole picture of the piece. But the pieces are not written to please double bass players, there is s.th. else at stake. So, this cannot be a criterion for judging a music piece as boring or not.
@notmyworld445 ай бұрын
@@peterwimmer1259 I like your comment, Peter, and I agree with you. The finale in Respighi's Pines of Rome is similar in that respect, but certainly not boring. I loved the building excitement while plunk-plunking toward to climax of the piece. Played it many times. Loved it! I wish my symphony experience had never ended, but nothing on this earth is forever.
@johncrwarner6 ай бұрын
Boring - is so personal. Something where I was bored or more accurately wishing it would end as I didn't want to hear anymore was Chopin's Piano Concerto no. 1 mostly because it was modelled on "not exciting" stuff (sorry Hummel) It is boring in comparison with other works he wrote I remember a BBC Radio programme about Ravel's Bolero where the piece was played through while they interviewed musicians. It was great radio and hearing a man who played the snare drum explaining his role and how he felt about it was interesting. I also remember as a student (of Chemistry) but interested in music going to a lecture on Schönberg's String Trio held in the University Music Venue (so seats for 500 people) There were eight of us if you include the lecturer and eleven if you include the players They played the piece once through, the lecturer gave his lecture with illustrations from the performers then they played it through again. Though it is not my favourite piece of Schönberg (I am a weird person and can and do "sing" parts of Pierrot Lunaire in the shower) it is a lot higher up because of that experience. I think experiences and location make up a lot of how we perceive music. A friend of mine who recorded every gig he went to went to a gig in Oxford to see two local bands the support band was "Ride" on their second gig ever and the headliners were "Satan Knew My Father" He rewound the tape of Ride and overwrote it with the headline band as Ride were too boring and infamously said they wouldn't amount to much. The next year Ride had their breakthrough and were pioneers in "shoegazer" music.
@davidtatro74576 ай бұрын
This video was great fun, and l agree with basically all of your rejoinders. Naturally, l had a hundred comments throughout, but have now pretty much forgotten them all. Looking forward to part 2! Oh, l do recall one comment l had, which is that l so agree with you that whenever Shosty was monotonous, it was done deliberately, and usually with great sense of irony. Also, the only piece of his that l really find uninspiring is the Festive Overture. But l recall that he might have written that in a single afternoon or some such?
@themusicprofessor6 ай бұрын
It's far from boring though!
@davidtatro74576 ай бұрын
@@themusicprofessor Oh, it isn't even remotely boring! It's just the least interesting popular piece he ever wrote. Haha
@BrentLeVasseur3 ай бұрын
Bartok’s concerto for orchestra and Ravel’s Daphnis and Chloe are the two ultimate pinnacles of orchestral writing. I’d even put Wagner and Stravinsky in there but down the list comparatively.
@Deanguilberry6 ай бұрын
That's funny. I've always wondered if people thought Beethoven went mad toward the end. I've read multiple bios and none talk about this. Some of his last works are so crazy. Thanks. I feel better now.
@VallaMusic6 ай бұрын
the problem is we have too much fantastic classical music that rarely or never sees the light of day in a live performance
@ralph01492 ай бұрын
You can go deeply into many pieces and find interest (unless it's Sorabji). I'm a big Stravinsky fan but in college The Rake's Progress was boring until I went deeper. I think the third listen was when it clicked. Likewise class assignments were a catalyst for discovering new things (under the threat of an F. Way back when we still had the old-school profs. No grade inflation there!).
@noglett6 ай бұрын
i'd love a video about the liszt sonata!
@MicheleAngeliniTenor6 ай бұрын
I have found that I harbored some prejudices from my youth that included works like the Liszt B minor sonata, the Franck Symphony in D (from having played it in a concert), Pelleas & Melisande, the Manfred Symphony, all of which I have since completely come around to and deeply love. For me, most minimalist music is inherently boring and uninteresting (Glass, Reich, Adams) although I can appreciate on the smallest level the inventiveness of the permutations, or, specific pieces, like Adams' "Short Ride in a Fast Machine". But if I had to really determine what music I now find truly boring, it would be Bruckner's orchestral anything (the Motets are like gems and so intensely beautiful), I still cannot find my way around the Goethe scene of Mahler 8 (and though I'm a devoted Mahlerian I always find any of the choral/vocal movements in the symphonies--except #4--to be the ones I am least drawn to), and Schubert's endless Piano Sonatas (which are full of beautiful things, they can be beautiful and still be boring totra listen to) and those damned interminable song cycles! I just won't have them and I have utterly no desire to sing them and have to spew out kilometers worth of stodgy and insipid text. No, thank you. What perhaps many would be shocked from me is that I find certain works like Le nozze di Figaro and L'elisir d'amore to be dreadful boring to sit through. There are, of course, specific arias and ensembles that are extraordinary, but I find that, even after 30 years of trying to listen and watch them, I lose interest far too quickly. They are both works of genius, and again, with many merits, but Nozze has, vocally and compositionally, almost nothing in comparison to Così fan tutte or Idomeneo or Entfuhrung, and of all of Donizetti's 78(+/-) operas, one sort of wishes L'elisir had been one of the forgotten ones and perhaps just "Una furtiva lagrima" remained as a staple repertoire piece, like so many other arias did of various operas which should never have fallen by the wayside. My other gripe about Nozze is that, other than the roles of Count and Countess, it is not so vocally demanding as other Mozartian roles...and as such, is able to accommodate a far larger range of singers of varying abilities and accomplishments to the point that they are more often than not sung quite poorly and with mediocre singers, students and small to regional theaters putting it on without expert artists, and this is the problem because to sing those roles truly well require people with great technical and theatrical accomplishment despite their apparent simplicity...it is the overly accessible nature of the piece (also, despite some extraordinary writing, the orchestration is not quite as complex, nor harmonically speaking, compared to his other operas) which has, in my opinion, devalued it tremendously. The same can be said of the Donizetti comedy...to really sing those parts well require artists of a certain level of accomplishment, but because it's a charming comedy, as is Nozze, directors run wild and are able to make a big theatrical splash with frequently basic and underwhelming vocalists. In general, I have found it's rarely the composer's fault that something is boring but it bores because of the performance/performers.
@themusicprofessor6 ай бұрын
As always, I'd say it boils down to performance. A great performance of Figaro can be electrifying! Interesting comment about the Goethe scene in Mahler 8: I think it's a strange and problematic thing in a way: Mahler attempting to write a spiritual opera and it feels a bit forced because he's trying so hard to make you realise how profound he is! I think Mahler's much more profound in his Rückert Lieder
@MicheleAngeliniTenor6 ай бұрын
@@themusicprofessor Max Rudolf used to say how people's reticence towards new music was really only about lack of familiarity; that any given work needs to be heard 3-4 times before a listener can determine anything concrete about it. Of course, we have a luxury of usually having multiple recordings to refer to, and as happens, if one has only ever heard one recording that might be on one's shelf and it's never quite moved one, it's useful to hear another or attend a live performance. Of course that goes for anything not just modern compositions. This was something my first bassoon teacher taught me: that it wasn't enough to just listen to a given work but that who was performing/conducting could often make all the difference. The Mahler movement really is problematic and I've yet to hear anyone really make it into something that doesn't feel totally static and dragging. I think so many conductors want to be indulgent to a point where it lacks forward propulsion of any sort. Oh, another composer who generally upset me is Hindemith! What wasted ink. Brilliant mind, so prolific, yet so very little that is truly inspired.
@themusicprofessor5 ай бұрын
Max Rudolf was right! And a really great performance can sometimes convince us that even pieces we don't like much are masterpieces!
@ShaunakDesaiPiano5 ай бұрын
6:41 thank you for not making me feel crazy for seeing the link between Bolero and Memory. The first time I heard Bolero I could have sworn I was listening to some orchestral version of Memory. Definitely a rip-off.
@johns.47086 ай бұрын
Pachelbel at the original _alla breve_ tempo moves right along, each variation topping the last. It is most always played at half tempo. The performance practice makes it less interesting, not the composition.
@HydroKestrel2 ай бұрын
The Musica Antiqua Köln performance actually plays it fast and it’s great
@ExtrackterYT2 ай бұрын
11:10 I've alwaus felt that theme to be one of the most _sardonic_ ones ever written... in that context.
@Tolstoy1116 ай бұрын
Haydn is absolutely wonderful. The symphonies all have their own unique character.
@LoriKirkpatrick6 ай бұрын
Yes, I agree...Haydn is always doing something surprising and brilliant...full of energy and taste...the Paris Symphonies are unbelievable in this way
@Xyriak6 ай бұрын
All 106 of them
@ThalesF75Ай бұрын
This guy's amazing! Love the Music Professor!
@themusicprofessorАй бұрын
Thanks so much!
@5ccir2555 ай бұрын
Can't believe the Chopin fugue has been memed so much its on first...
@anthony-s8l3dАй бұрын
I don't understand at all how anyone could find Shostakovitch's 7th boring. And I disagree with your opinion that the First Movement theme is banal. It is simple, and simple is not the same as banal. I also question your opinion that this theme represents the march of fascism. My interpretation is informed only by what the music tells me. It tells me of the growing resistance of the Russian people to Hitler's invasion, and the immense struggle to stop and reverse it. Shostakovitch himself tried to enlist in the Russian army, but was rejected due to poor eyesight. So whatever he may have later said about this work, at the time of writing he was as immersed as he could be in the war effort to defeat fascism. As the great composer he was, he could make the same theme reflect different emotions. When it returns at the end of the last movement, it sadly reflects on the aftermath of the conflict; the destruction and death inflicted on Leningrad's residents and soldiers.
@themusicprofessorАй бұрын
Thank you for that insight about the growing resistance of the Russian people. That does make sense.
@4stringed6 ай бұрын
It's funny how I almost feel like I can't agree to any comment. One about Einaudi is right, though
@LeGrandJohnson4 ай бұрын
Shostakovich 7, Brahms Piano Concerto 1, and The Lark Ascending are some of my favorite pieces
@Iceland8746 ай бұрын
I always thought some of Schumann was boring. Some of Jan Peeterzoon Sweelinck’s organ fantasias go on and on seemingly endlessly. They are like an author than rambles on and on and takes forever to actually say something. I played several this morning merely for the sight reading brain work. I have always thought Haydn’s symphonies are boring. Also I was never excited about learning Kabalevsky’s sonatinas. Thank you for this video. It reminded me of all the music I have found boring in my life.
@ukdavepianoman6 ай бұрын
Classical music CAN be boring...so can jazz, pop music, rap, country and western. I don't find Bolero particularly interesting, especially compared with Ravel's two Piano Concerti and his piano music. Leningrad Symphony, Bartok Concerto for Orchestra, Mahler 1, Brahms PC1 and Liszt Piano Sonata are wonderful, exciting masterpieces. For me, Einaudi is boring as his music is rather static rhymically and harmonically. Not a huge Haydn fan, but he did develop the symphony significantly and his English piano sonata is wonderful.
@seajaytea934021 күн бұрын
You mentioned Beethoven's Op 132 - so I had to stop what I was doing and listen to it. Wonderful! 😊
@themusicprofessor20 күн бұрын
There's a bit more about it here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eHO4p2uphcyEprssi=_4OJfstuhmAhyVe1&t=898
@RachManJohn6 ай бұрын
Oh, and at 17:28 did you really correct Amy Beach to Bach? I mean, I'm sure someone who calls themselves the Music Professor has at least heard of Beach, but it's a little sad to see that you didn't recognize the name immediately. Edit: ah, you immediately corrected it. My bad. But still, she is the person I'd have put in that series of composers instead of Bach, who I believe still has some pretty unfortunate works.
@webz35892 ай бұрын
Oh Andrew loyd webber ripped a lot of thing off. That famous organ part from phantom of the opera is a near enough note for not ripoff of pink floyds echoes.
@tommccanna70362 ай бұрын
It's also very similar to a passage in Vaughan Williams London Symphony.
@BsktImp6 ай бұрын
Ooh, I was expecting a barely penetrable video essay bursting with obscure references and dispirate connections, academic jargon and the most abstruse theories on value judgements eventually concluding Wagner's _Ring_ is more boring than a sine wave pure tone (perhaps).
@ftumschk6 ай бұрын
.... _Rhine_ wave, surely?
@shumandaniele6 ай бұрын
I've tried Bruckner several times and always found it boring. I just can't get it I suppose.
@SullenSecret6 ай бұрын
Orchestral music has some of the most fun combination of notes and sounds I've ever heard. Try out the music from the games, Stellaris or Skyrim. Beautiful. Meanwhile, popularized music is often lacking in variety of notes and creativity. How do people define boring? Lack of singing?
@wendelynmusic6 ай бұрын
All music can be boring if you hear it enough. I don't like a lot of classical music because you hear it everywhere. I also don't like hearing the Beatles for the same reason. But Stockhausen and Subotnik remain interesting because you don't hear them every day.
@jesustovar25495 ай бұрын
Curiously that's not my case.
@masajbeyrifat68956 ай бұрын
There are basically two types of music. Educational and entertaining. In the past centuries, those who wanted to listen to educational music might get bored with entertaining (time-passing) music. Similarly, people who intended entertaining music would find educational (prescriptive) music boring. Nowadays, with the spread of digital culture, I think the majority has shifted to educational music. The algorithm of everything is being solved and having fun and spending time is becoming a mindless behavior.
@pamplemoo5 ай бұрын
you mean it's shifted to entertaining music
@masajbeyrifat68955 ай бұрын
@@pamplemoo No. To educational music. Love from Turkey. >> kzbin.info/www/bejne/hnPNonZ_rbp2hNE
@edgarreitz70676 ай бұрын
When i think of Stamitz i first think of the father then of the Solo Concerts By the son (where Are certainly Great works among!) Maybe the similarity with haydn is the difference in quality. Some pieces sound Kind of odd (even if i Love haydn, yes, some of the 105 (?) Haydn Symphonies do too). But they have in common, that they share the experimental classical character especially with Form!
@BlablaBlabla-sl3pt6 ай бұрын
It should be a crime to say that Papa Haydn is boring, he is one of the most inventive, funniest composers and pieces like his creation or late sonatas can compete with anything Mozart ever composed
@qualitymusic1225 ай бұрын
Can we get an analysis of Tchaikovsky's Pathétique Symphony, please?
@themusicprofessor5 ай бұрын
Yes - that would be nice.
@clawtooth356 ай бұрын
I personally find Ravel's Bolero boring despite being a huge Ravel fan -- just because it is *so* long and is often only trotted out at concerts because of the Torville and Dean connection (at least in the UK). I feel similarly about the 1812 overture. The famous bit is just right at the end of course, but they played it at the Edinburgh Festival Fireworks one year and the crowd was listless. I also say this as someone who likes Tchaikovsky. I think my biggest one personally is Scarlatti Sonatas. I know that he was incredibly prolific in writing them but I find them to just be a little overly flowery and the subjects go on a little too long before the development starts. I suppose that might not be entirely the same thing as boring? I just find them a little eye-rolling.
@themusicprofessor6 ай бұрын
A good performance of Bolero might convince you how wonderful it really is: all Ravel's genius focussed on pure melodic unravelling and slow, incremental sonic change and expansion. Scarlatti's sonatas are things of wonder: they explote 18th century instrumental form and keyboard writing from almost every imaginable angle. kzbin.info/www/bejne/a5_IgoB_ea2VndUsi=8tDcuNJu4Y3NjdLc
@jesustovar25495 ай бұрын
Yeah Bolero can become pretty basic if you listen to the rest of Ravel, I love the 1812 Overture and hearing it with a chorus is even more EPIC, I have nothing negative to say about Tchaikovsky, but he surely did, he hated it, he wasn't convinced by some of his own works, sometimes I wonder if he regretted been a composer.
@themusicprofessor5 ай бұрын
Tchaikovsky knew he was good - no one could write the Pathetique Symphony and not know they were a great composer! But he had a lot of self doubt and was easily depressed (as all composers are) by bad performances. He also submitted all his scores to his friend Taneyev who was a really brutal critic!
@clawtooth355 ай бұрын
@@themusicprofessor Tchaikovsky's life has always fascinated me, particularly his relationship with his patroness, and his death.
@TenorCantusFirmus6 ай бұрын
"According to Reddit". Me: "Well, that's the sign we don't need to care about it..."
@climate426 ай бұрын
Bruckner's fifth symphony might be his best. There are a number of bad recordings, even by famous conductors
@jonnsmusich2 ай бұрын
"Boring" is a simple reflection of the subject's state of mind. Apparently not everyone knows this.
@peterwimmer12596 ай бұрын
All in all, the choice of the "boring" music pieces is quite on the surface. If those "music lovers" criticising the pieces cannot mention other works than those classics, it shows that they do not really know more than the basic repertoire everybody knows. And their judgment is most probably not a very understanding and deep one.
@onlykarlhenning6 ай бұрын
Good show!
@maclayyc6 ай бұрын
Please do a thing about Liszt sonata
@clecle96326 ай бұрын
Off-topic but how are you able to recall so many works from memory at the keyboard? Does it come from having studied the scores or does it have more to do with a well trained ear?
@adamguitar14986 ай бұрын
I can probably answer this. There are two types of musicians (generic statement, take with a grain of sugar) ones who learn to memorize and learn how to do it well, and those who while they can still memorize, are able to audiate the music very well. It's hard to describe, but if you can hear it accurately in your head, you can play it. It's almost like on the spot transcribing and performing of what you are hearing in your head. Also, don't underestimate how much time and experience they have under their belt, and how that might contribute
@themusicprofessor6 ай бұрын
@adamguitar1498 has already kindly answered this. Yes, I have good musical recall so I can essentially play things 'by ear' if I need to. I think the video demonstrates that I don't always do it elegantly (especially on an electric keyboard - we might try to do more of this kind of thing on the piano in future!) I don't necessarily have to have seen a score to reproduce it fairly accurately at the piano. These are mostly skills I developed as a teenager (a very long time ago!) I'm actually sorry that the 'spontaneity' of this video means that the playing/singing is extremely rough!
@robertmueller20236 ай бұрын
Concerto No. 1 in G minor? This is a damn cool piece, and damn hard to me. Chock full of bravura from the beginning. Why was my professor dismissive of Mendelssohn's piano works?
@themusicprofessor6 ай бұрын
There's a lot of strange snobbery around Mendelssohn - possibly a vestige of Wagner's antisemitic propaganda still hanging around.
@dosterix60346 ай бұрын
Saying Liszts sonata in b minor is boring is a crazyy take, it gotta be one of the top ten masterpieces from the solo piano repertoire
@octopuszombie87446 ай бұрын
Some non-musicians hate it because it's too complex for them and some musicians hate it because they just hate liszt and think he's just raw technique.
@dosterix60346 ай бұрын
@@octopuszombie8744 imo the sonata in b minor is a perfekt example for the Musical Genius side of Liszt
@Boccaccio18116 ай бұрын
I think it was a reference to Brahms falling asleep during a performance of that sonata
@mazeppa12316 ай бұрын
@@octopuszombie8744 It's still crazy to see that piece on there, nonetheless. Not only is it one of the most exciting pieces of solo piano, but it's a treasure trove to analyze, because you begin to understand the structure and what Liszt does in that piece. That said, most of Liszt's pieces are underrated, as he is so often misunderstood and dismissed as a composer who is "just raw technique". Most of his reminiscences and fantasies (e.g. Don Juan, Lucrezia Borgia, La Scala) are also fantastic to analyze for similar reasons to the sonata, and they are exciting as well. I can add Mephisto Waltz there too. The one problem that Liszt faces however, is that so many pianists don't give many of his pieces justice.. either due to their difficulty or their interpretations that aren't suited with what they are playing. One example is Jorge Bolet's grand galop chromatique, which is terrible, boring, and is not how the piece should be played when you compare that to the score!! Now, I'm certain that other composers face that similar problem (e.g. Gould's appassionata comes to mind).. but with Liszt, that problem seems to be magnified a lot more.
@Warstub2 ай бұрын
I love Mozart, but in general, I find his Adagios and Andantes pretty boring. There's only a few from the symphonies that I like (28, 29, 39...). The Flute Quartets (sonatas?) have their moments, but aren't particularly outstanding. Also, there's a piece he wrote for 4 string ensembles - I didn't know who it was when I was listening to it, but I found it quite stale and uninteresting and assumed it was Haydn. Turned out to be Mozart's experiment in surround sound by employing four separate ensembles or quartets and placing them in each corner of a room. At least, that's how it was explained on the radio.
@themusicprofessor2 ай бұрын
Mozart's Adagios and andantes in all his mature piano concertos and late symphonies and chamber works are some of the most beautiful music that exists. The piece you mention is the remarkable experimental Notturno for 4 orchestras in D major K. 286 in which 4 orchestras have to play in different parts of a large space and converse with each other. It's a piece that only really makes sense live and can hear the spatial effect: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y2LNc52DqN6Am9ksi=vaxXoMTxXRd0cG8p
@WarstubАй бұрын
@@themusicprofessor I do love the Larghetto from Piano Concerto 27 - that melodic figure is heartbreakingly beautiful.
@MaggaraMarine6 ай бұрын
To be fair, that Stamitz performance shown in the video is just terrible. Still not the most exciting music out there, but that performance doesn't do the music any justice.
@charlesenos14836 ай бұрын
I sat through an entire live performance of Cosi Fan Tutti with horn intonation no better than in the Stamitz example, I have suffered.
@federicoprice26876 ай бұрын
I got into the habit of switching Classic FM on every morning during the pandemic.... and.... aaargh! To put it simply, many months later, it had completely ruined my enjoyment of some of my hitherto favourite pieces. And by the time the 698th rendition of 'The Lark Ascending' had only reached the end of the third bar, The Radio Descended, like a brick, through my kitchen window. Sorry RVW, Classic FM cracked me!
@ScottPalmer-mp1we6 ай бұрын
Pardon me if I show ignorance (hope I don't), but I find rock/pop music to be boring. Within a given song, I perceive almost no variation in rhythm. volume or instrumental variety (except maybe Chicago with its horns), and little or no modulation. It is written for a low attention span crowd. That may be a reason why there are few if any rock concertos or symphonies. Many classical pieces, especially from the Romantic era and on have incredible variety and sweet melodies. This may also be true of the Classical period but maybe my ear and mind isn't trained well enough to perceive the excitement in such music. Even atonal music like the opera Wozzeck by Alan Berg can be fascinating.
@marknieuweboer80996 ай бұрын
Overall you're right - so it's fun to look for the exceptions. I suggest Gentle Giant and Emerson, Lake and Palmer's Tarkus. The remark about lack of instrumental variation is a bit off the point. The string quartet genre "suffers" from the same.
@ScottPalmer-mp1we6 ай бұрын
@@marknieuweboer8099 I was speaking in general. Nonetheless, I find there is an almost complete lack of rhythmic variety within most if not all pop songs.
@luke99475 ай бұрын
Yes, i agree that you show ignorance
@climate426 ай бұрын
Haydn is the most consistently interesting composer of the classical Era. The invention is just jaw-dropping. Mozart may be a greater composer but he is nowhere near as consistently good.
@juuus27645 ай бұрын
Listen to the late works by boulez! You will be amazed. (Sur incises, Notations pour orchestre...)
@themusicprofessor5 ай бұрын
I love these pieces.
@pocoapoco25 ай бұрын
There is no music that's boring, only boring performances.
@peterwimmer12596 ай бұрын
These "boring"-comments talk more about those persons' own limits and lack of insight rather than about the limits of the scolded music pieces. Some people don't realize how stupid their remarks are.
@Lawrence.BennettАй бұрын
Genius, and fantastic pianist!!!!
@samuelstephens61635 ай бұрын
Anyone wanting to genuinely move away from Canon in D should check out Pachelbel's Hexachordum Apollonis.
@brutusalwaysminded6 ай бұрын
Reddit is a refuge, seldom a place for discovery. Enjoyed your post, though! Thx. 🌝
@HA11EYS_COM3T6 ай бұрын
I dislike the assertion that there’s any one greatest person at anything creative.
@hashdankhog85785 ай бұрын
the Mendelssohn viola sonata is not boring at all, the second and third movements are really really really good
@willduffay22072 ай бұрын
My controversial choices are the first couple of movements of the Symphonie Fantastique, and ..... rather a lot of Bruckner. I'm sloooowly coming round to the latter now i'm well into my 6th decade but by god he's a frustrating composer. I find the lesser 18th century composers boring - it is remarkable that really only Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven did the classical style really well - and the endless violin sonatas by people like Leclair and Albinoni. I think Handel wasn't immune to some of that instrumental churning too, although 95% of Handel is wonderful. But I guess the point is it's a matter of opinion largely. And even more than that, about bad performances.
@Fanchen5 ай бұрын
Philip Glass? I just cannot connect with his music
@hashdankhog85785 ай бұрын
Same, I rather listen to schonberg than something like einstein on the beach
@ralph01492 ай бұрын
One of the biggest overhypes in music history. Paint-by-numbers elevated to Caravaggio.
@jamesoliver66256 ай бұрын
I get bored by 85% of the Mahler I've listened to, 90% of the Bruckner. Shostakovich 7th has the misfortune of falling between the 4th and the 8th and consequently will forever be passed by. The first mvt of the 7th was finished before the association with the Nazi conflict was appended to it I have read. Haydn's Violin Concerto in C is thee epitome of grace.
@jesustovar25495 ай бұрын
I like Mahler, Shostakovich and Bruckner, so sorry for you😂
@jamesoliver66255 ай бұрын
@@jesustovar2549 DS is my favorite composer, very closely followed by Richard Strauss although the portion of what they wrote that infects me is NOT the usual suspects. Having majored in Comp in the late 60 to 70s I'm also very partial to the mid 20th century moderists which hardly anyone listens to today, Carl Ruggles being my favorite (terrible man, shattering composer, intriguing artist). It's my opinion tha "classical" music is taking a step backward from the challenges of the mid 20th century, a period of recuperation before that music is "rediscovered" and made assimilable by wider performance.
@jesustovar25495 ай бұрын
@@jamesoliver6625Ha I love Richard Strauss too, so thank you.
@SittaCarolinensis2 ай бұрын
Bruckner's symphonies - one symphony repeated another eight (or nine) times!