Mo Pinel Interview Part 2 | The Rant Episode 12! Layouts, 14lbs vs 15lbs, Strong Cores and more!

[@tnjrcfl1]

Re-watch.... damn miss his info... much love to the Pinel's and MO will never be forgotten. TNJR

[@300x2869]

Thank you Mo for what you have done for the technology of the sport. Mikey is incredibly smart and hopefully between him and Bryan Buckosh the technology has a bright future ahead. You will certainly be missed. RIP.

[@jcjufer2737]

Always loved listening to MO talk, was such a smart guy..!!

[@johnniec2861]

Love that just over Mo the Legend's shoulder is Dale E Sr, legend in Nascar,, SWEET !!

[@StevenA-fp3zj]

Great Interview Chris!! Mo Rules!!

[@michaelmann3636]

Excellent job guys❗️Thanks a bunch✌🏻

[@Clarkson350]

Great Video! See something very good has come from the shutdown

[@BowlersRant]

Thank you sir!

[@brandonferris8934]

I really want to know what Radical is about to release! You all know about the Radical Results, and Mo still just said his best one hasn't come out yet! I can't wait to see what it is.

[@garlandoverton727]

Beautiful interview Chris.... #ThatsRadical

[@kb1767]

Sad when he said I want to be here for a while. 😩

[@glevy17]

Yeah I felt that too, what a good guy. On a bowling note I still have my Morich weapon of mass bias. Best ball I ever had (succeeded my Hammer maxx 3d offset)

[@kb1767]

@@glevy17 badass!

[@FredSoDak]

In the strong core segment, Mo states that the Results is the first strong asym in the history of bowling, based on his 2 requirements of the definition of strong asym... I have a Slant Pearl in 14 lbs that meets his definition... the Slant was years before the Results... Mo seems to have forgotten something. I wish the Booster core would make a comeback.

[@nordattack]

The core only determines the ball motion when it is matched with a proper layout that brings out the abilities of the core. Take any good core design and put the wrong layout on it and you will have a dud. Additionally, a great layout on a ball with no core will enable that ball to respond as if it does have a core. The additional 3 oz of static weight allows coreless balls to have much greater dynamics than ever before.

[@loryli]

Great show Beans! Keep up the great work.

[@brianlevandowski3167]

With him now gone, I don’t think anyone is working as hard on advancement in core technology thinking out of the box shapes with purposes to them using layouts that put them in drive. It seems obvious that now people want the Same core that is good to stick around for years and years, or bringing remakes or special editions back with updates coverstocks. So do we need core advancement or just the A+ balls to stick around ?.

[@elijahalfaro2690]

22:00 manifested the spy bowling ball

[@bagger3002]

Great job with Mo. He's freaking awesome! Now go make yourself a pizza. :)

[@BowlersRant]

Only on the weekend!

[@Zardoz125]

What was the USBC’s reason for eliminating the balance hole?

[@vontazevonhunna8270]

Because usbc wants the player to actually have the ball drilled correctly and not just drill a side hole and call it a day...someone I forgot who he a youtuber too, says pro shops that drills the side whole dont know what they are doing and you should stop going to them.

[@byronfranek2706]

Pattern stability. But, unless the USBC begins to control oil patterns used for sanctioned play, the balance hole rule will not change anything at all.

[@michaellopour7409]

I think they were trying to control the amount of intermediate differential that is imparted to the ball AFTER drilling. If you can only have 2 or 3 holes you end up much closer to the "undrilled" specs. That's why Mo is trying to make really strong cores intermediate-differential-wise.

[@larryverble4476]

According to their "extensive study", extra holes, overall, can add up to 2 boards of total hook. The USBC has stated that it is not about trying to reduce the scoring pace, it is an effort to have the oil pattern hold up longer, so proprietors won't have to keep adding more oil (length and volume) to their patterns.

[@KennyGrinols]

I don't understand all this talk about the Results being a big deal, when Mo created the LevRG Core about 13 years ago, which had a higher Diff and higher Int diff.

[@FredSoDak]

I have a Slant Pearl in 14 lbs that also meets his 2 definition requirements of strong asym... the Results was not the "first".

[@coopergates9680]

24:14 From your very own gang a while back Mo, get a load of this RG.... 123bowl.com/bowling-balls/brunswick/fuze-navy-sparkle/

[@russellgilbert3453]

MoNoJoke!