3:57 I think you made a little misteak with the notation, because you put sin(0) instead sin(π)
@realgwenstacy3 жыл бұрын
it just so happens that sin(0)=sin(pi)
@weebtuku3 жыл бұрын
I think it's just sin(0) = sin(pi) = 0
@feuerwelle45623 жыл бұрын
Like i said just a mistake in the notation.
@gustavozola71673 жыл бұрын
Yeah.. I noticed that too
@bprpcalculusbasics3 жыл бұрын
Ah yes. Thanks.
@Sebastian-yi4kz2 жыл бұрын
i have a math mid-semester final exam around 8 hours from now and i watched this as a refresher since i wasn't able to practice solving IVPs as much as i would've wanted earlier today. your video helped me a lot! thank you!
@NemoTheGlover3 жыл бұрын
thanks 💪 can't wait for series in the next 2-3 weeks
@lesserknownfacts78493 жыл бұрын
Please make a video discussing the domains of the following pair of functions - 1) 1/tan(x) and cot(x) 2) 1/sin(x) and cosec(x) 3) 1/sec(x) and cos(x) It would be really interesting to watch the video in which you will explain why the above pairs of functions are equal or unequal.
@lesserknownfacts78493 жыл бұрын
@@aashsyed1277 Ik, but sec(x) is undefined at all odd integral multiples of pi/2.
@lesserknownfacts78493 жыл бұрын
@@aashsyed1277 If sec(x) is undefined then 1/sec(x) also has to be undefined.
@lesserknownfacts78493 жыл бұрын
@@aashsyed1277 The 2 things are different. The limit exists but the function is undefined.
@feuerwelle45623 жыл бұрын
@@lesserknownfacts7849 you can see 1/sec(x) in two ways. 1/sec(x) and 1/1/cos(x). Multiply top and bottom by cos(x) and you get just cos(x)
@AlgyCuber3 жыл бұрын
3:52 shouldn't it be sin(pi)?
@bprpcalculusbasics3 жыл бұрын
Ah yes. Thankfully sin(pi)=sin(0)=0
@sarmadmaqsood7273 жыл бұрын
loved this video even thought im in calc 1 this enlightened me nonetheless
@ethan85593 жыл бұрын
Good job samrad
@sarmadmaqsood7273 жыл бұрын
@@ethan8559 🦗
@sudhakarmathsacademy3 жыл бұрын
It is really great mathematician
@user-wu8yq1rb9t3 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@amanullahasif76473 жыл бұрын
At 16:00 why don't we take e^c3 as another constant C? If we did, it would be different answer i think..
@crosserr4043 жыл бұрын
We could do that, but the answer would be the same. y(x) = e^(c3*e^x) = (e^c3)^(e^x) = c^(e^x) So y(0) = π = c^(e^0) c = π Thus y(x) = π^(e^x)
@hugoslavia3670 Жыл бұрын
Cheers bro
@shannu_boi3 жыл бұрын
11:20 I'm confused. How is c3 a constant it can be +c2 or -c2? You used the positive one only and got the ans -2+2e^(1/2x^2+x-4) But if we used the negative one we get a different ans, namely -2-2e^(1/2x^2+x-4) Why do we only use the positive c?
@feuerwelle45623 жыл бұрын
We don't get a different result for the function. If we do it your way, we get 2 answers for C. If C is positive we get the answer C=2e^-4. If C is negative we get the solution C=-2e^-4. When we put these two into the original function we get 2e^(1/2x²+x-4)-2 and -(-e^(1/2x²+x-4))-2. As you can see, negative + negative = positive, so we actually get the same result.
@shannu_boi3 жыл бұрын
@@feuerwelle4562 Oh right. If we use negative c then the function is is different as well. Idk why I didn't see that. Thank you very much!!
@erikross-rnnow55173 жыл бұрын
I'm a little confused on the first one. I only get one answer which is: -1+(1/2*sin(x)+1)^2 and not the other one. I isolated the constant before isolating y, which I guess is the reason I only have one solution and two? The two solutions bprp get also seem to be overlapping, which I recall two solutions to a DE shouldnt? Honestly prolly just me being a goof and not knowing something vital, anyone wanna help?
@materiasacra3 жыл бұрын
You are correct, the video is wrong. There is only one (real) solution. The problem occurs at 2:56 when Lord BPRP squares both sides. This introduces a parasitic solution. If you try to substitute back the second claimed solution, you find that sqrt(y+1) is NOT equal to 1/2*sin(x)-1, which is negative for all real x, but -(1/2*sin(x)-1). Hence the second claimed solution does not solve the original equation.
@thenew3dworldfan7 ай бұрын
Wolfram alpha also gives 2 solutions. Which BPRP checks on wolframalpha and is correct. There is something called the existence and uniqueness theorem, that guarantees, whether or not a differential equation has multiple solutions or is guaranteed to have one solution.
@eganrabiee6272 ай бұрын
It's calculus...in algebra! It's Calcgebra!
@KUDIYARASAN-4 ай бұрын
Genius
@Mitalee15083 ай бұрын
I don't why I am focusing on the pokeball he's holding 😂