Bradley Fighting Vehicle vs. M113 and Stryker What Sets Them Apart

[@MrKentaroMotoPI]

Stryker was the primary vehicle that overran Kursk defenses. The "Stryker Oblast".

[@PpAirO5]

I like them all, but I see the Stryker as the most versatile and overall goodie of the 3.

[@pieter7360]

The M113 (M1113 typo in the video name) does not protect against RPGs and is outclassed in every other way. It is old and shouldn't de compared to modern systems.

[@darkandgritty]

spoiler none of them protect against RPG's. You dont want to be in any of these vehicles being hit from any angle with an RPG-29 or anything modern

[@lordtomlluckrahthegreat9014]

I think he meant "RPG-7" specially, firing old PG-7V grenades. Whatever the case, this video mentioned that all Striker chassis come equipped with an integrated APS system to protect against AT rockets and missiles. I believe there are also some modernization packages for the M113 that give it an APS system as well. Then there's the Bradley, which is naturally better armoured than the other two; I've read stories of Bradleys surviving multiple strikes from RPG-7s, so it seems the design is itself somewhat protected from HEAT warheads without the immediate need for APS.

[@GUnit2214]

There are some impressive modernization projects for the M113 that greatly improves it's awareness and survival in the battlefield. So despite it's old age they won't let it die :).

[@duncasaur5074]

I would go with the Stryker there's like 10 versions including one with a 25mm chaingun im sure you can mount a TOW if you wanted then you'd have the exact same offensive capability as a Bradley except significantly faster & with APS standard & a RPG cage + the V bottom hull i honestly think the Stryker has a higher survivability than the Bradley like Ali said float like a butterfly sting like a bee now if was working alongside an Abrams I'd probably go with the Bradley but that would be the only reason I would go with a Bradley over a Styker Edit/PS: the Stryker is also much more quieter due to the wheels & stealth is a huge advantage as well as it being lighter thus more easily transported via helicopter negating the slight off road edge of tracks & the Bradley

[@JamesOMalley-hb4tf]

Aps isn't standard....

[@PpAirO5]

Agree.

[@dfmcgee42]

The 25mm chaingun stryker you're talking about is the ICV-D Dragoon, which actually has 30mm remote turret. Although I do agree that the Stryker compliments dismounted infantry well, I do not think it's a better fighting vehicle than the bradley. The one fault with Dragoon is that it doesn't have enough protection like the bradley, and having a tow would expose it for too long. Luckily the ICV-J variant has a javelin attachment which allows the crew to shoot faster and displace without having to stay in place with a tow. The Dragoons could in theory have a javelin attachment added to it, but a TTP my platoon used when I was a Stryker PL, was to just kick out a javelin team then pick then up rapidly.

[@duncasaur5074]

@@dfmcgee42 fair enough thank you for your insight tbh i have no military experience most of my knowledge comes from video games and history specifically im thinking about things like the Toyota wars when chad used hilux's with various rockets and missiles to outmaneuver and overwhelm libyan tanks to amazing success but im also aware those were soviet era tanks with slow analog turrets and even worse targeting systems but that's not the only historical conflict to support that mentality but at the end of the day i don't have any real world experience im just under the mindset that mobility is king id rather have wheels than tracks but i've seen countless evidence of what the javelin is capable of and yeah I think your right id rather have a javelin than the TOW that being said general dynamics have released promotional footage of the next gen strykers and they have a twin javelin system AND an option with what was either Maverick or Hellfire missiles i forgot which it was but both of those are highly effective so if those are actually what they say they are (especially the mine and IED resistance upgrades) i would 100% take those over a Bradley btw i still really like the Bradley i just prefer the mobility and surprise factor of the stryker

[@dfmcgee42]

@duncasaur5074 no problem brother! I was also in a Bradley unit when I was enlisted in the Guard before my active duty time, and i miss the bradley lol. I do agree, mobility is key in a vehicle fight.

[@darylturner2321]

My best friend died in a M113 in 1969 in VietNam. Think how old that design is, and that was 55 years ago. Time for a new & better design. I think the Bradley does that. As does the Stryker & the Stryker is fast, but maybe not as maneuverable cross country.

[@emgab1481]

The stryker does not have a 105mm gun that is a variant of the stryker which doesnt carry any troops

[@justjackmarstonwithinternet]

"The Stryker does not come with a 105 except for when it does but when it does I'll just ignore that because then I'm wrong"

[@emgab1481]

@@justjackmarstonwithinternet the stryker mgs is the 105mm version but it can only hold a crew not infantry if we are measuring all vehicles i think we should only included the stats of the original model

[@hotdog9262]

@@emgab1481 the 105 is discontinued is it not

[@JGPlunder]

How is the 105mm worse than the 25mm? Is it the rate of fire difference? Also you say the Stryker doesn't meet the Bradley's troop capasity bit it carries 9 passengers and the Bradley is 6

[@perzival757]

Make a video on belgorod submarine

[@KilroyishereYT]

Bradley is a legendary vehicle which gave its name to a small region near Robotine in Ukraine. Seriously, why do they call this area like “BRADLEY SQUARE”???

[@KilroyishereYT]

To tell the truth... the total failure of the Bradleys in this area does not come from defects in this vehicle but from Washington's error which pushed the Ukrainians to attack the fortifications without having control of the sky, without having the means to clean the mines, without having qualified personnel to operate the war machines. Apart from its excessive height of 3.40 meters, the Bradley is a fairly good vehicle if used for its true function in a brigade.

[@ryanjones7]

Did you just reply to yourself

[@GavinAkers-mg4nd]

It’s called poor usage. The Ukrainians have no idea how to use their western tanks each timme they get a new one and a good bit get taken out and then they figure out how to use them in ukriane

[@SoheilHashempour]

Terme condition wich one necessary for battlefield.

[@lordtomlluckrahthegreat9014]

6:51 "However, it's firepower falls short of (the) Bradley's 25mm chaingun and TOW missiles" How could a 105mm cannon fall short of anything? Seriously? How can one 25mm chaingun and two - count them - two wire-guided AT missiles be greater than a 105mm autoloader coupled with a .50BMG machine gun?

[@biaduy8760]

M2 = IFV M113 = APC Stryker = AFV

[@maruruku3158]

Bradley is more like a light tank at this point

[@UFO-Ark]

This show contradicts itself throughout the whole show. One moment it says the Bradley carrys the least soilders, then it says the Stryker carries less..?

[@jamalbaguan8386]

M113 trusted battle tested APC in late ww2 in vietname war in korean war in cuba offensive in gulf war in middle east iraq and syria civil war in ukraine in Palestine in lebanon in israel in marawi siege in 2001 all outvwar in mindanao all around in tge world. The M113 is old US APC design but capable in modern warfare.

[@kevinkant6817]

I want to buy one of each

[@ryanjones7]

Damn that alot of money

[@Gedeon_N]

When it comes to desing, the M113 definitely is my favorite! Can this vehicle be modernised and equipt with for example a 25mm gun and/or TOW/Stinger missile launcher?

[@paratrooper629]

When I was a young Captain attending IOAC at Ft Benning there was on display an M113 equipped with a LAV 25 turret. Took only 4 hours to install. That was in 1985. The Canadian Army looked at it but chose the LAV 25.

[@Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P]

'Stryker MGS' ( the one with the Large gun {105mm} ) was retired in 2022, due to costs and Maintenance!! [But still my favorite "Looking" vehicle]. 'Bradley' has been upgraded MANY times...latest version is a 'Fire Support Vehicle' that replaces the TOW for a target location equipment ( a big Eye ). M113............ well........ It's still around!! In many countries, and even in war with ruSSian-Ukraine and Hamas-Israeli wars!! Report Dec 2024.

[@xylem2202]

How is a 105mm cannon not as powerful as a 25mm gun? Seems a little ridiculous to me.

[@delichte101]

The Bradley does have APS

[@WarWithIn]

Are you saying the stryker 😂has a 105 mm Canon and can carry 9 soldiers? Are you kidding me? And the stryker didn't come with trophy system as standard 🙄 wtf are you talking about?

[@AhmadM25]

??

[@WarWithIn]

@@AhmadM25 المدرعة الستريكر ١٠٥ مم مينفعش تشيل جنود، و هوا بيقول انه بتشيل ٩، و الAPS مكنش موجود على المدرعة من البداية بيتكلم على السلاح و هوا مش فاهم

[@dfmcgee42]

Yeah the MGS can barely hold a crew of 3 with a full load out. There's no way it can carry 9 more dismounts lol.

[@NoBodysGamer]

You are drunk, everything he said is correct, he never said that ALL Strykers come with 105mm canon, its an option, up to 105mm canon and UP TO 9 crew

[@risbolensky3921]

Nothing. Both are easily destroyed by FPV's and artillery without air support 😆

[@usun_politics1033]

They burn the same in minefields.

[@andreww1225]

Same as what? They definitely don’t burn as bad as Russian equipment

[@noco7243]

Never seen a turret pop like a T-72

[@benquinneyiii7941]

Get on the right side of the trade off

[@كرار-ك8ز5ح]

Scrap America 100 Bradley 😂

[@ryanjones7]

What are u trying to say

[@thenewmorgan5662]

​@ryanjones7 From what i can tell from a few other vids on the stryker and this one, apparently the 90 or so Strykers that the U.S sent to Ukraine have all got dusted off, ive actually seen a lot of comments about it not just on this video.

[@squatchpnw2331]

The m113 is not a fighting vehicle and its armor won't stop anything bigger than ak47 Think of it more like a truck used to transport supplies to the front lines.

[@warfootage7890]

I don't know about differences but i can say that they have one similarity that this western vehicle's poorly performed & didn't stand against Russia😂😂😂

[@jakekn7304]

The only one performing poorly is Russia. Imagine losing your best jets, bombers and air defenses to cardboard drones, and losing a submarine and flagship to a country without a navy 😂

[@JamesOMalley-hb4tf]

​@@jakekn7304your comment is aging badly....Russia has clearly won. You fell for the propaganda.... probably believe Arabs did 9/11 and believe that covid 19 vaccine is good too! 🤡

[@knowledge-is-infinite]

To be frank all this so called game changer machines doesn't have a chance against Russian shovel. They will be good for burning to keep warm in winter.

[@JamesOMalley-hb4tf]

Hi guys, in a dummy and l know absolutely nothing about armoured vehicles but im going to make videos about them anyways!!! 😂😂