Bradley Fighting Vehicle vs. M113 and Stryker What Sets Them Apart

Imagine a busy battlefield filled with armored vehicles. The Bradley, resembling an armored titan, unleashes its formidable 25mm Chain Gun, punctuating the air with fiery bursts. Alongside, the M113 stands robust and steadfast, carrying soldiers who are ready to jump out and secure important areas. Meanwhile, the Stryker, swift and agile, strikes like a modern-day cavalry with its 105mm gun. These armored giants bring their own set of strengths to the battlefield. But what sets them apart from one another? How do they measure up in terms of firepower, versatility, and battlefield prowess? Join us as we delve into these military marvels, uncovering the distinctive features that make them the stalwarts of modern armed forces.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

[@pieter7360]

The M113 (M1113 typo in the video name) does not protect against RPGs and is outclassed in every other way. It is old and shouldn't de compared to modern systems.

[@usun_politics1033]

They burn the same in minefields.

[@andreww1225]

Same as what? They definitely don’t burn as bad as Russian equipment

[@PpAirO5]

I like them all, but I see the Stryker as the most versatile and overall goodie of the 3.

[@duncasaur5074]

I would go with the Stryker there's like 10 versions including one with a 25mm chaingun im sure you can mount a TOW if you wanted then you'd have the exact same offensive capability as a Bradley except significantly faster & with APS standard & a RPG cage + the V bottom hull i honestly think the Stryker has a higher survivability than the Bradley like Ali said float like a butterfly sting like a bee now if was working alongside an Abrams I'd probably go with the Bradley but that would be the only reason I would go with a Bradley over a Styker Edit/PS: the Stryker is also much more quieter due to the wheels & stealth is a huge advantage as well as it being lighter thus more easily transported via helicopter negating the slight off road edge of tracks & the Bradley

[@JamesOMalley-hb4tf]

Aps isn't standard....

[@PpAirO5]

Agree.

[@dfmcgee42]

The 25mm chaingun stryker you're talking about is the ICV-D Dragoon, which actually has 30mm remote turret. Although I do agree that the Stryker compliments dismounted infantry well, I do not think it's a better fighting vehicle than the bradley. The one fault with Dragoon is that it doesn't have enough protection like the bradley, and having a tow would expose it for too long. Luckily the ICV-J variant has a javelin attachment which allows the crew to shoot faster and displace without having to stay in place with a tow. The Dragoons could in theory have a javelin attachment added to it, but a TTP my platoon used when I was a Stryker PL, was to just kick out a javelin team then pick then up rapidly.

[@duncasaur5074]

@@dfmcgee42 fair enough thank you for your insight tbh i have no military experience most of my knowledge comes from video games and history specifically im thinking about things like the Toyota wars when chad used hilux's with various rockets and missiles to outmaneuver and overwhelm libyan tanks to amazing success but im also aware those were soviet era tanks with slow analog turrets and even worse targeting systems but that's not the only historical conflict to support that mentality but at the end of the day i don't have any real world experience im just under the mindset that mobility is king id rather have wheels than tracks but i've seen countless evidence of what the javelin is capable of and yeah I think your right id rather have a javelin than the TOW that being said general dynamics have released promotional footage of the next gen strykers and they have a twin javelin system AND an option with what was either Maverick or Hellfire missiles i forgot which it was but both of those are highly effective so if those are actually what they say they are (especially the mine and IED resistance upgrades) i would 100% take those over a Bradley btw i still really like the Bradley i just prefer the mobility and surprise factor of the stryker

[@dfmcgee42]

@duncasaur5074 no problem brother! I was also in a Bradley unit when I was enlisted in the Guard before my active duty time, and i miss the bradley lol. I do agree, mobility is key in a vehicle fight.

[@perzival757]

Make a video on belgorod submarine

[@xylem2202]

How is a 105mm cannon not as powerful as a 25mm gun? Seems a little ridiculous to me.

[@WarWithIn]

Are you saying the stryker 😂has a 105 mm Canon and can carry 9 soldiers? Are you kidding me? And the stryker didn't come with trophy system as standard 🙄 wtf are you talking about?

[@AhmadM25]

??

[@WarWithIn]

@@AhmadM25 المدرعة الستريكر ١٠٥ مم مينفعش تشيل جنود، و هوا بيقول انه بتشيل ٩، و الAPS مكنش موجود على المدرعة من البداية بيتكلم على السلاح و هوا مش فاهم

[@dfmcgee42]

Yeah the MGS can barely hold a crew of 3 with a full load out. There's no way it can carry 9 more dismounts lol.

[@NoBodysGamer]

You are drunk, everything he said is correct, he never said that ALL Strykers come with 105mm canon, its an option, up to 105mm canon and UP TO 9 crew

[@kevinkant6817]

I want to buy one of each

[@ryanjones7]

Damn that alot of money

[@Gedeon_N]

When it comes to desing, the M113 definitely is my favorite! Can this vehicle be modernised and equipt with for example a 25mm gun and/or TOW/Stinger missile launcher?

[@paratrooper629]

When I was a young Captain attending IOAC at Ft Benning there was on display an M113 equipped with a LAV 25 turret. Took only 4 hours to install. That was in 1985. The Canadian Army looked at it but chose the LAV 25.

[@biaduy8760]

M2 = IFV M113 = APC Stryker = AFV

[@KilroyishereYT]

Bradley is a legendary vehicle which gave its name to a small region near Robotine in Ukraine. Seriously, why do they call this area like “BRADLEY SQUARE”???

[@KilroyishereYT]

To tell the truth... the total failure of the Bradleys in this area does not come from defects in this vehicle but from Washington's error which pushed the Ukrainians to attack the fortifications without having control of the sky, without having the means to clean the mines, without having qualified personnel to operate the war machines. Apart from its excessive height of 3.40 meters, the Bradley is a fairly good vehicle if used for its true function in a brigade.

[@ryanjones7]

Did you just reply to yourself

[@GavinAkers-mg4nd]

It’s called poor usage. The Ukrainians have no idea how to use their western tanks each timme they get a new one and a good bit get taken out and then they figure out how to use them in ukriane

[@squatchpnw2331]

The m113 is not a fighting vehicle and its armor won't stop anything bigger than ak47 Think of it more like a truck used to transport supplies to the front lines.

[@emgab1481]

The stryker does not have a 105mm gun that is a variant of the stryker which doesnt carry any troops

[@justsomejackmarstonwithint7248]

"The Stryker does not come with a 105 except for when it does but when it does I'll just ignore that because then I'm wrong"

[@emgab1481]

@@justsomejackmarstonwithint7248 the stryker mgs is the 105mm version but it can only hold a crew not infantry if we are measuring all vehicles i think we should only included the stats of the original model

[@risbolensky3921]

Nothing. Both are easily destroyed by FPV's and artillery without air support 😆

[@user-lh4te2ro1j]

Scrap America 100 Bradley 😂

[@ryanjones7]

What are u trying to say

[@thenewmorgan5662]

​@ryanjones7 From what i can tell from a few other vids on the stryker and this one, apparently the 90 or so Strykers that the U.S sent to Ukraine have all got dusted off, ive actually seen a lot of comments about it not just on this video.

[@knowledge-is-infinite]

To be frank all this so called game changer machines doesn't have a chance against Russian shovel. They will be good for burning to keep warm in winter.

[@warfootage7890]

I don't know about differences but i can say that they have one similarity that this western vehicle's poorly performed & didn't stand against Russia😂😂😂

[@jakekn7304]

The only one performing poorly is Russia. Imagine losing your best jets, bombers and air defenses to cardboard drones, and losing a submarine and flagship to a country without a navy 😂

[@JamesOMalley-hb4tf]

​@@jakekn7304your comment is aging badly....Russia has clearly won. You fell for the propaganda.... probably believe Arabs did 9/11 and believe that covid 19 vaccine is good too! 🤡

[@isaacseyi4160]

All have bitten the dust in Ukraine😊

[@PipesEnjoyer]

Meanwhile all of Russian no-analogy weaponry that have went extinct in Ukraine:

[@LordElmo420]

And your t-72's, s-300's, s-400's, SU-37's, etc. have all done so well. 5-10% of America's fighting capabilities are in Ukraine in terms of armaments, 50% of Russia's capability is destroyed. PLEASE keep talking.

[@isaacseyi4160]

@@LordElmo420 yh 5-10% from US + each European country donating 5-10%, shows how poorly the collective nato ism

[@LordElmo420]

@@isaacseyi4160 yes relatively small donations mixed with COLD WAR ERA tech and weapons, now what happened to your moskva?? How's that black sea fleet doin?? How are your tanks?? What happened with your merc group?? Wanna talk??

[@LordElmo420]

@@isaacseyi4160 you made it all the way to Kyiv in a couple days and then got pushed back to about 1/5 the country away from the border. Multiple friendly fire incidents. Your "great Russian bear" is a stuffed teddy bear at the bottom of a donation box in a goodwill. Shut. You know nothing about this war. Understand this.

[@JamesOMalley-hb4tf]

Hi guys, in a dummy and l know absolutely nothing about armoured vehicles but im going to make videos about them anyways!!! 😂😂